The present technology relates generally to monitoring neuromodulation and associated systems and methods. In particular, several embodiments are directed to endovascular monitoring systems and associated systems and methods.
The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) is a primarily involuntary bodily control system typically associated with stress responses. SNS fibers that innervate tissue are present in almost every organ system of the human body and can affect characteristics such as pupil diameter, gut motility, and urinary output. Such regulation can have adaptive utility in maintaining homeostasis or preparing the body for rapid response to environmental factors. Chronic activation of the SNS, however, is a common maladaptive response that can drive the progression of many disease states. Excessive activation of the renal SNS in particular has been identified experimentally and in humans as a likely contributor to the complex pathophysiology of hypertension, states of volume overload (such as heart failure), and progressive renal disease. For example, radiotracer dilution has demonstrated increased renal norepinephrine (“NE”) spillover rates in patients with essential hypertension.
Cardio-renal sympathetic nerve hyperactivity can be particularly pronounced in patients with heart failure. For example, an exaggerated NE overflow from the heart and kidneys is often found in these patients. Heightened SNS activation commonly characterizes both chronic and end stage renal disease. In patients with end stage renal disease, NE plasma levels above the median have been demonstrated to be predictive of cardiovascular diseases and several causes of death. This is also true for patients suffering from diabetic or contrast nephropathy. Evidence suggests that sensory afferent signals originating from diseased kidneys are major contributors to initiating and sustaining elevated central sympathetic outflow.
Sympathetic nerves innervating the kidneys terminate in the blood vessels, the juxtaglomerular apparatus, and the renal tubules. Stimulation of the renal sympathetic nerves can cause increased renin release, increased sodium (Na+) reabsorption, and a reduction of renal blood flow. These neural regulation components of renal function are considerably stimulated in disease states characterized by heightened sympathetic tone and likely contribute to increased blood pressure in hypertensive patients. The reduction of renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate that result from renal sympathetic efferent stimulation are likely a cornerstone of the loss of renal function in cardio-renal syndrome (i.e., renal dysfunction as a progressive complication of chronic heart failure). Pharmacologic strategies to thwart the consequences of renal efferent sympathetic stimulation include centrally acting sympatholytic drugs, beta blockers (intended to reduce renin release), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and receptor blockers (intended to block the action of angiotensin II and aldosterone activation consequent to renin release), and diuretics (intended to counter the renal sympathetic mediated sodium and water retention). These pharmacologic strategies, however, have significant limitations including limited efficacy, compliance issues, side effects, and others. Recently, intravascular devices that reduce sympathetic nerve activity by applying an energy field to a target site in the renal artery (e.g., via radiofrequency ablation) have been shown to reduce blood pressure in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension.
Many aspects of the present disclosure can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale. Instead, emphasis is placed on illustrating clearly the principles of the present disclosure. Furthermore, components can be shown as transparent in certain views for clarity of illustration only and not to indicate that the illustrated component is necessarily transparent.
Specific details of several embodiments of the present technology are described herein with reference to
Renal neuromodulation is the partial or complete incapacitation or other effective disruption of nerves innervating the kidneys (e.g., rendering neural fibers inert or inactive or otherwise completely or partially reduced in function). For example, renal neuromodulation can include inhibiting, reducing, and/or blocking neural communication along neural fibers (i.e., efferent and/or afferent nerve fibers) innervating the kidneys. Such incapacitation can be long-term (e.g., permanent or for periods of months, years, or decades) or short-term (e.g., for periods of minutes, hours, days, or weeks). Renal neuromodulation is expected to efficaciously treat several clinical conditions characterized by increased overall sympathetic activity, and, in particular, conditions associated with central sympathetic overstimulation such as hypertension, heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic and end stage renal disease, inappropriate fluid retention in heart failure, cardio-renal syndrome, osteoporosis, and sudden death, among others. The reduction of afferent neural signals typically contributes to the systemic reduction of sympathetic tone/drive, and renal neuromodulation is expected to be useful in treating several conditions associated with systemic sympathetic overactivity or hyperactivity. Renal neuromodulation can potentially benefit a variety of organs and bodily structures innervated by sympathetic nerves. For example, a reduction in central sympathetic drive may reduce insulin resistance that afflicts patients with metabolic syndrome and Type II diabetics.
Thermal heating effects described herein can include both thermal ablation and non-ablative thermal alteration or damage (e.g., via sustained heating and/or resistive heating). Desired thermal heating effects may include raising the temperature of target neural fibers above a desired threshold temperature to achieve non-ablative thermal alteration, or above a higher threshold temperature to achieve ablative thermal alteration.
Various techniques can be used to partially or completely incapacitate neural pathways, such as those innervating the kidneys. The purposeful application of energy (e.g., radiofrequency energy, mechanical energy, acoustic energy, electrical energy, thermal energy, light, etc.) to tissue and/or the purposeful removal of energy (e.g., thermal energy) from tissue can induce one or more desired thermal heating and/or cooling effects on localized regions of the tissue. The tissue, for example, can be tissue of the renal artery and adjacent regions of the renal plexus (RP), which lay intimately within or adjacent to the adventitia of the renal artery. For example, the purposeful application and/or removal of energy can be used to achieve therapeutically effective neuromodulation along all or a portion of the renal plexus (RP).
In the era of evidence-based medicine, evaluating the efficacy of an ablation treatment, such as neuromodulation, can be important in gauging whether a treated patient may need additional neuromodulation treatment and/or alternative treatment. Neuromodulation efficacy is currently assessed by measuring and analyzing various physiological parameters (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure, etc.). However, statistically meaningful changes in such physiological parameters may not be observed until at least two weeks (and in most cases, months) after completion of the treatment. In the absence of real-time or at least relatively contemporaneous feedback, nerves that are under ablated, over ablated, or missed altogether may go undetected, rendering the treatment unsuccessful. As a result, an unsuccessful treatment may not be clinically addressed until weeks or months after the initial treatment. Even then, the treatment will be categorized as “successful” or “not successful” but the cause of the non-success will remain unknown. To address this need, the present technology provides several embodiments of devices, systems, and methods that facilitate relatively rapid analysis of neuromodulation efficacy by using return energy of diagnostic ultrasound and/or electromagnetic energy, such as optical energy, emissions to characterize neuromodulated nerve and tissue as well as provide positional feedback to facilitate positioning of the device.
The console 106 can be configured to control, monitor, supply, or otherwise support operation of the treatment device 102. For example, the console 106 can include an energy generator configured to generate a selected form and magnitude of therapeutic, neuromodulation energy (e.g., radiofrequency energy (“RF”), pulsed energy, microwave energy, optical energy, ultrasound energy (e.g., high intensity focused ultrasound energy or non-focused ultrasound energy), direct heat energy or another suitable type of energy) for delivery to the target treatment site via the neuromodulation element 140. In some embodiments, neuromodulation may be achieved by a chemical treatment including delivering one or more chemicals (e.g., guanethidine, ethanol, phenol, a neurotoxin (e.g., vincristine)), or another suitable agent selected to alter, damage, or disrupt nerves. In some embodiments, the console 106 can store cooling fluid that can be transferred to the treatment device 102 (via the connector 108) for cryotherapeutic neuromodulation.
The console 106 can further be configured to generate a selected form and magnitude of diagnostic energy and/or a signal that causes the transducer 142 to produce diagnostic energy for emission and reflection and/or absorption at a treatment site. Suitable diagnostic energies include diagnostic ultrasound (e.g., acoustic) and electromagnetic radiation (e.g., optical energy). Diagnostic energy provided for emission/detection purposes differs from therapeutic ultrasound and/or electromagnetic energy used to cause neuromodulation. In some embodiments, the console 106 can be configured to generate and transmit (via the connector 108) the neuromodulation energy and a signal that causes the transducer 142 to produce diagnostic energy to the treatment assembly 114. For example, the system 100 can include a synchronization algorithm (
The console 106 can be electrically coupled to the treatment device 102 via the connector 108 (e.g., a cable). One or more supply wires (not shown) can pass along the elongated shaft 116 or through a lumen in the elongated shaft 116 to the neuromodulation element 140 and/or the transducer 142 to transmit the required energy to the neuromodulation element 140 and/or the signals to the transducer 142. A control mechanism, such as foot pedal 136, may be connected (e.g., pneumatically connected or electrically connected) to the console 106 to allow the operator to initiate, terminate and, optionally, adjust various operational characteristics of the console 106, including, but not limited to, power delivery.
The console 106 can also be configured to deliver the neuromodulation energy via an automated control algorithm 132 and/or under the control of a clinician. In addition, one or more diagnostic algorithms 134 may be executed on a processor (not shown) of the system 100. Such diagnostic algorithms 134 can provide feedback to the clinician, such as via an indicator 126 (e.g., a display, a user interface, one or more LEDs, etc.) associated with the console 106 and/or system 100. For example, the console 106 may include an optional user interface that can receive user input and/or provide information to the user and/or processing circuitry for monitoring one or more optional sensors (e.g., pressure, temperature, impedance, flow, chemical, ultrasound, electromagnetic, etc.) of the treatment assembly 114 and/or treatment device 102. The feedback from the diagnostic information may allow a clinician to better position the device at the treatment site and/or determine the effectiveness of the applied energy during the treatment and/or shortly thereafter (e.g., while the patient is still catheterized). Likewise, while the patient is still catheterized, a clinician may decide to repeat a treatment based on feedback from the diagnostic information. Accordingly, this feedback may be useful in helping the clinician increase the likelihood of success of the current or subsequent treatments. Further details regarding suitable control algorithms 132 and diagnostic algorithms 134 are described below with reference to
The system 100 can further include a controller 138 having, for example, memory (not shown), storage devices (e.g., disk drives), one or more output devices (e.g., a display), one or more input devices (e.g., a keyboard, a touchscreen, etc.) and processing circuitry (not shown). The output devices may be configured to communicate with the treatment device 102 (e.g., via the connector 108) to control power to the neuromodulation element 140 and/or transducer 142. In some embodiments the output devices can further be configured to obtain signals from the neuromodulation element 140, the transducer 142, and/or any associated sensors. Display devices may be configured to provide indications of power levels or sensor data, such as audio, visual or other indications, and/or the display devices may be configured to communicate the information to another device.
In some embodiments, the controller 138 can be part of the console 106, as shown in
The neuromodulation element 140 of the treatment assembly 114 can be configured to modulate one or more renal nerves within tissue at or at least proximate to a wall of the renal vessel or lumen. The neuromodulation element 140 can include one or more energy delivery elements (e.g., electrodes) (not shown). For example, in some embodiments, the neuromodulation element 140 can be a single energy delivery element located at a distal portion 118 of the treatment assembly 114. In other embodiments, the neuromodulation element 140 can include two or more energy delivery elements. The energy delivery elements can be separate band electrodes spaced apart from each other along a portion of the length of the shaft 116. The electrodes can be adhesively bonded to a support structure at different positions along the length of the shaft 116. In some embodiments, the energy delivery elements can be formed from a suitable electrically conductive material (e.g., a metal, such as gold, platinum, alloys of platinum and iridium, etc.). The number, arrangement, shape (e.g., spiral and/or coil electrodes) and/or composition of the energy delivery elements may vary. The individual energy delivery elements of the neuromodulation element 140 can be electrically connected to the handle assembly 112 and/or the console 106 by a conductor or bifilar wire extending through a lumen of the shaft 116.
In embodiments where the neuromodulation element 140 includes multiple energy delivery elements, the energy delivery elements may deliver power independently (e.g., may be used in a monopolar fashion), either simultaneously, selectively, or sequentially, and/or may deliver power between any desired combination of the elements (e.g., may be used in a bipolar fashion). Furthermore, the clinician optionally may be permitted to choose which energy delivery element(s) are used for power delivery in order to form highly customized lesion(s) within the vessel (e.g., the renal artery) or other body lumens (e.g., the ureter), as desired. In some embodiments, the system 100 may be configured to provide delivery of a monopolar electric field via the neuromodulation element 140. In such embodiments, a neutral or dispersive electrode 130 may be electrically connected to the console 106 and attached to the exterior of the patient (as shown in
The transducer 142 can include an emitter 144 (
Additionally or alternatively, the transducer 142 can be an electromagnetic transducer (not shown). The electromagnetic transducer 142 can emit electromagnetic energy (e.g., infrared, near infrared, visible, ultraviolet radiation, etc.) toward tissue at least proximate a wall of a renal vessel, or artery or another body lumen (e.g., the renal artery). Return energy, however, is measured by how much radiation is absorbed by the tissue and how much energy is reflected by the tissue back to the transducer 142 and/or detector 146. For example, at least a portion of the electromagnetic energy emitted by the emitter 144 of the electromagnetic transducer 142 can be absorbed by the vessel wall. The detector 146 then measures the return energy as the quantity of light not absorbed. As discussed in greater detail below, the return energy (e.g., ultrasound reflections and/or the amount of electromagnetic energy absorbed/not absorbed) may have varying parameters depending on type of tissue contacted by the emitted diagnostic energy. For example, neural tissue, smooth muscle tissue of the vessel wall, fat tissue, lymph node tissue, damaged tissue, and other local tissue individually exhibit different responses to diagnostic ultrasound and/or electromagnetic energy.
After detecting the return energy, the detector 146 and/or transducer 142 then convert the reflected energy to a signal, and transmits that signal to the controller 138 (
Non-exhaustive examples of the one or more parameters of return energy the controller 138 and/or diagnostic algorithms 134 may include an amplitude of the return energy, an average amplitude of the return energy, a minimum amplitude of the return energy, a maximum amplitude of the return energy, rate of change of amplitude, an amplitude at a predetermined or calculated time relative to a predetermined or calculated amplitude, a frequency of the return energy, an average frequency of the return energy, a minimum frequency of the return energy, a maximum frequency of the return energy, rate of change of frequency, a frequency at a predetermined or calculated time relative to a predetermined or calculated frequency, a change in time between the emission of energy and the detection of a return energy (referred to herein as a “detection time”), a detection time at a predetermined or calculated time relative to a predetermined or calculated detection time, change(s) in temperature over a specified time, a maximum temperature, a maximum average temperature, a minimum temperature, a temperature at a predetermined or calculated time relative to a predetermined or calculated temperature, an average temperature over a specified time, and other suitable measurements and/or derived statistics thereof.
Referring to
Once the treatment assembly 114 is positioned at a treatment location, the guidewire can be at least partially introduced (e.g., inserted) into or removed (e.g., withdrawn) from the treatment assembly 114 to transform or otherwise move the treatment assembly 114 to a deployed state. In cases where a guide sheath is used, the guide sheath can be at least partially removed (e.g., withdrawn) to transform the treatment assembly 114 into the deployed state (e.g., expanded, bent, deflected, helical and/or spiral, balloon, zig-zag, star-shaped, Malecot, etc.). For example, at least a portion of the treatment assembly 114 can have a shape memory corresponding to a deployed state and the sheath and/or guidewire can prevent the treatment assembly 114 from deploying in response to the shape memory before reaching the treatment location. In some embodiments, the treatment assembly 114 can be converted (e.g., placed or transformed) between the delivery and deployed states via remote actuation, e.g., using an actuator 122 (
In the deployed state, the treatment assembly 114 can be configured to contact an inner wall of the vessel (e.g., the renal artery) and to cause a fully-circumferential lesion without the need for repositioning. For example, the treatment assembly 114 can be configured to form a lesion or series of lesions (e.g., a helical/spiral lesion or a discontinuous lesion) that is fully-circumferential overall, but generally non-circumferential at longitudinal segments of the treatment location. This can facilitate precise and efficient treatment with a low possibility of vessel stenosis. In other embodiments, the treatment assembly 114 can be configured to form a partially-circumferential lesion or a fully-circumferential lesion at a single longitudinal segment of the treatment location. During treatment, the treatment assembly 114 can be configured to partially or fully occlude the vessel (e.g., the renal artery). Partial occlusion can be useful, for example, to reduce renal ischemia, and full occlusion can be useful, for example, to reduce interference (e.g., warming or cooling) caused by blood flow through the treatment location. In some embodiments, the treatment assembly 114 can be configured to cause therapeutically-effective neuromodulation (e.g., using ultrasound energy) without contacting a vessel wall.
Examples of other suitable neuromodulation delivery configurations, deployment configurations and/or deployment mechanisms can be found in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/910,631, filed Oct. 22, 2010, entitled “APPARATUS, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR ACHIEVING INTRAVASCULAR, THERMALLY-INDUCED RENAL NEUROMODULATION,” U.S. application Ser. No. 13/281,361, filed Oct. 25, 2011, entitled “CATHETER APPARATUSES HAVING MULTI-ELECTRODE ARRAYS FOR RENAL NEUROMODULATION AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS,” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/646,218, filed May 5, 2012, entitled “MULTI-ELECTRODE CATHETER ASSEMBLIES FOR RENAL NEUROMODULATION AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS,” which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
A. Power Delivery
As mentioned above, the console 106 can be configured to deliver the neuromodulation energy (e.g., RF energy) via an automated control algorithm 132 and/or under the control of a clinician.
Furthermore, the control algorithm 132 includes monitoring one or more of the temperature, time, impedance, power, flow velocity, volumetric flow rate, blood pressure, heart rate, parameters of return energy, or other operating parameters. The operating parameters may be monitored continuously or periodically. The control algorithm 132 checks the monitored parameters against predetermined parameter profiles to determine whether the parameters individually or in combination fall within the ranges set by the predetermined parameter profiles. If the monitored parameters fall within the ranges set by the predetermined parameter profiles, then treatment may continue at the commanded power output. If monitored parameters fall outside the ranges set by the predetermined parameter profiles, the control algorithm 132 adjusts the commanded power output accordingly. For example, if a measured temperature threshold (e.g., 65° C.) is achieved, then power delivery is kept constant until the total treatment time (e.g., 120 seconds) has expired. If a first temperature threshold (e.g., 70° C.) is achieved or exceeded, then power is reduced in predetermined increments (e.g., 0.5 watts, 1.0 watts, etc.) until the measured temperature drops below the first temperature threshold. If a second temperature threshold (e.g., 85° C.) is achieved or exceeded, thereby indicating an undesirable condition, then power delivery may be terminated. The system may be equipped with various audible and visual alarms to alert the operator of certain conditions.
B. Synchronization of Sensing and Power Delivery
At one or more timepoints during and/or after delivering the therapeutic energy, the transducer 142 can be activated to provide feedback as to the efficacy of the ongoing or completed therapeutic energy delivery. The transducer 142 can be activated automatically by the controller 138 or manually by the clinician. The transducer 142 can emit energy and detect a return energy continuously, at set intervals, and/or at one or more discrete timepoints that are selected automatically or by the clinician. When RF energy is used to modulate the nerves, the console 106 and/or controller 138 can run a synchronizing algorithm 400 that avoids interference between the RF signals to the neuromodulation element 140 (e.g., ≥100 KHz) and the signals to the transducer 142 (e.g., 20-40 MHz). As shown in
With the treatments disclosed herein for delivering therapeutic energy to target tissue, it may be beneficial to evaluate a relative position of at least a portion of the treatment assembly 114 before delivering the therapeutic energy. Contact between the energy delivery element and the tissue, nerve alignment, and nerve proximity are all factors that can affect the efficacy of the neuromodulation. Accordingly, one or more transducers 142 carried by the treatment assembly 114 can be configured to emit energy towards the vessel wall and send information regarding a detected return energy of the emission to the controller 138. As discussed in greater detail below, the controller 138 can execute one or more diagnostic algorithms 134 that can inform a clinician of a position of at least a portion of the treatment assembly 114 relative to a vessel wall and/or a nerve (e.g., a renal nerve).
A. Feedback Related to Tissue Contact
The quality and/or success of the purposeful application of energy depends at least in part on having good contact between the energy delivery element and the tissue at a desired target site. If the contact between the energy delivery element and the tissue is insufficient, the energy delivery is more likely to be therapeutically ineffective. For example, insufficient contact can cause under-ablation, over-ablation, inadequate lesion formation, premature high impedance shut-off, etc. Accordingly, it is often important to determine whether there is adequate tissue contact before delivering energy. Many clinicians currently use a combination of tactile feedback, imaging devices, and/or other qualitative measures to assess tissue contact, but these measures often do not accurately determine electrode-tissue contact. For example, intracardiac echocardiography provides a real-time image of the anatomy surrounding the distal portion of an ablation catheter, but it does not give an objective assessment of electrode-tissue contact, nor does it have sufficient contrast to visualize the formation of created lesions (e.g., 2D images of a 3D surface).
The method can continue by determining the proximity of the treatment assembly 114 to the vessel wall which can be determined based on the detected return energy (block 506).
Determining the relative position of the energy delivery element 148 to the vessel wall (VW) based on the return energy detected by the transducer 142 is possible so long as the transducer 142 and the corresponding energy delivery element 148 are fixedly positioned on the treatment assembly 114 relative to each other. In other words, the diagnostic algorithms 134 discussed herein can take into account the relative position of the transducer(s) 142 and energy delivery elements 148 and normalize the resulting proximity determinations accordingly.
Referring to
Depending on the result of decision block 602, the controller 138 can cause an indicator to notify the clinician whether to reposition the treatment assembly 114 (block 604) or begin energy delivery (block 606). For example, if the detection time within a desired range, the contact between the energy delivery element 148 and the vessel wall (W) is sufficient for treatment (see
If the detection time is not in the desired range, the controller can cause the indicator to display insufficient electrode-tissue contact and the clinician can reposition the treatment assembly 114. Indications of insufficient electrode-tissue contact can include messages on the display 126 of the console 106 such as “Insufficient Contact,” “Reposition Catheter,” a red light, or other notifications. If the treatment assembly 114 is repositioned, stages 502-506 (
The detection time may be greater than the baseline detection time due to chronic instability of at least a portion of the treatment assembly 114 instead of inadequate positioning of the treatment assembly 114 or energy delivery element 148. In these and other embodiments, the controller may further include an algorithm configured to assess such chronic instabilities in conjunction with one or more of the control and/or diagnostic algorithms disclosed herein. Such suitable algorithms are disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 13/281,269, filed Oct. 25, 2011, entitled “DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR EVALUATION AND FEEDBACK OF NEUROMODULATION TREATMENT,” and U.S. application [Reference No. C3171.USU1], entitled “DEVICES, SYSTEMS, AND METHODS FOR EVALUATION AND FEEDBACK OF NEUROMODULATION TREATMENT,” filed Mar. 15, 2013, are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
B. Feedback Related to Positioning
Several aspects of the present technology that are directed to determining the proximity of at least a portion of the treatment assembly 114 to the renal nerve (RN) can also be used to enhance the efficacy of treatment. For example, the neuromodulation element 140 of the treatment assembly 114 can be more accurately aligned with renal nerve(s) (RN) such that the energy is more consistently delivered to the renal nerves (RN) instead of smooth muscle tissue of the vessel where there is little or no neural tissue. This may provide for more consistent ablation or other neuromodulation of the renal nerves (RN), reduce or otherwise modify the power delivery, and/or enhance control of other parameters of the control algorithm 132.
Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the amplitude and frequency of the detected return energy can depend in part on the types of tissue through which the diagnostic energy propagates. For example, referring to
In some embodiments, if the parameter of return energy (e.g., amplitude or frequency) is outside of a predetermined range, the controller 138 can cause the indicator to indicate the radial proximity (RPN) and automatically adjust and/or modify the power-control algorithm 132. The predetermined range can have a selected minimum or maximum threshold value that set a floor or ceiling, a minimum a non-zero lower limit and a maximum upper limit that set a floor and a ceiling, or a mid-point and an acceptable margin around the midpoint. In one embodiment, the indicator can provide a message that the nerve is closer than expected when the radial proximity (RPN) value is low or that the nerve is deeper than expected when the radial proximity (RPN) value is high. In some embodiments, the clinician can manually adjust the power-control algorithm. If the parameter of return energy is within a predetermined threshold, the controller 138 can cause the indicator to indicate the radial proximity (RPN) is suitable (e.g., the nerve is within a desired distance and alignment with the energy delivery element 148). At this point, the clinician can begin neuromodulation, or alternatively, the clinician can continue to check other relative positions of the treatment assembly 114.
In some embodiments, if the parameter of return energy (e.g., amplitude or frequency) is outside of a predetermined range the controller 138 can cause the indicator to indicate the circumferential proximity (CPN) and automatically adjust and/or modify the power control algorithm 132. The predetermined range can have a selected minimum or maximum threshold value that set a floor or ceiling, a minimum a non-zero lower limit and a maximum upper limit that set a floor and a ceiling, or a mid-point and an acceptable margin around the midpoint. In one embodiment, the indicator can provide a message that the energy delivery element(s) 148 of the treatment assembly 114 are not adequately circumferentially aligned with the renal nerve when the circumferential proximity (CPN) value is high. The indicator can further instruct the clinician to reposition the treatment assembly 114. In some embodiments, the controller 138 can automatically cause a motorized transducer to rotate the energy delivery element(s) 148 so as to be in proper alignment. If the parameter of return energy is within a predetermined threshold, the controller 138 can cause the indicator to indicate alignment. At this point, the clinician can begin neuromodulation, or alternatively, the clinician can continue to check other relative positions of the treatment assembly 114.
A. Feedback Related to Tissue Characterization
Similar to the disclosure with reference to
Accordingly, disclosed herein are one or more diagnostic algorithms that can use the raw signal corresponding to the detected return energy to characterize tissue at or at least proximate to a wall of a vessel (e.g., a renal artery). The diagnostic algorithm can characterize tissue based on one or more parameters of return energy to provide meaningful, real-time or relatively contemporaneous feedback to the clinician regarding the efficacy of the ongoing and/or completed energy delivery while the patient is still catheterized.
B. Feedback Related to Vessel Wall Temperature
As mentioned above, it is believed that the reflected energy associated with a diagnostic ultrasound energy emission can vary depending on the properties of the reflecting surface (e.g., tissue). During a neuromodulation treatment, the temperature of the tissue at the vessel wall increases as energy is delivered to the tissue. This increase in temperature alters and/or affects the reflective properties of the tissue such as the ability of the tissue to conduct sound. For example, as the temperature of the tissue is increases, the speed of sound propagating through the tissue can increase. As a result, the time it takes to detect a reflection of emitted diagnostic ultrasound energy decreases as the temperature of the tissue increases. Accordingly, disclosed herein are one or more diagnostic algorithms that can use the raw signal corresponding to the detected reflection of a diagnostic ultrasound emission to determine the temperature of the vessel wall tissue (e.g. a renal artery) at a treatment site.
For example,
Using the difference in detection time between one or more sets of sequential time points, the diagnostic algorithm 1100 can determine a vessel wall temperature gradient in the direction of energy delivery (block 1108). For example, the temperature gradient may show different temperature values as the depth of the wall increases radially. In some embodiments, the diagnostic algorithm 1100 can correlate the detection time data to other parameters of return energy, such as amplitude and/or frequency, to enhance the accuracy and/or interpretation of the temperature gradient. Furthermore, the tissue temperature of the vessel wall at increasing radial depths can also inform a clinician of the degree of tissue damage and/or lesion depth. Current neuromodulation systems measure temperature through a temperature sensor (e.g., thermocouple, thermistor, etc.) positioned in or near the energy delivery element and thus are unable to gauge temperature across a vessel wall since. Such sensors are limited to temperature measurements at or near the interior surface of the vessel wall and can be inaccurate due to variations in blood flow and the degree of contact between the energy delivery element and the vessel wall.
The following discussion provides further details regarding pertinent patient anatomy and physiology. This section is intended to supplement and expand upon the previous discussion regarding the relevant anatomy and physiology, and to provide additional context regarding the disclosed technology and the therapeutic benefits associated with renal denervation. For example, as mentioned previously, several properties of the renal vasculature may inform the design of treatment devices and associated methods for achieving renal neuromodulation via intravascular access, and impose specific design requirements for such devices. Specific design requirements may include accessing the renal artery, facilitating stable contact between the energy delivery elements of such devices and a luminal surface or wall of the renal artery, and/or effectively modulating the renal nerves with the neuromodulatory apparatus.
A. The Sympathetic Nervous System
The Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) is a branch of the autonomic nervous system along with the enteric nervous system and parasympathetic nervous system. It is always active at a basal level (called sympathetic tone) and becomes more active during times of stress. Like other parts of the nervous system, the sympathetic nervous system operates through a series of interconnected neurons. Sympathetic neurons are frequently considered part of the peripheral nervous system (PNS), although many lie within the central nervous system (CNS). Sympathetic neurons of the spinal cord (which is part of the CNS) communicate with peripheral sympathetic neurons via a series of sympathetic ganglia. Within the ganglia, spinal cord sympathetic neurons join peripheral sympathetic neurons through synapses. Spinal cord sympathetic neurons are therefore called presynaptic (or preganglionic) neurons, while peripheral sympathetic neurons are called postsynaptic (or postganglionic) neurons.
At synapses within the sympathetic ganglia, preganglionic sympathetic neurons release acetylcholine, a chemical messenger that binds and activates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors on postganglionic neurons. In response to this stimulus, postganglionic neurons principally release noradrenaline (norepinephrine). Prolonged activation may elicit the release of adrenaline from the adrenal medulla.
Once released, norepinephrine and epinephrine bind adrenergic receptors on peripheral tissues. Binding to adrenergic receptors causes a neuronal and hormonal response. The physiologic manifestations include pupil dilation, increased heart rate, occasional vomiting, and increased blood pressure. Increased sweating is also seen due to binding of cholinergic receptors of the sweat glands.
The sympathetic nervous system is responsible for up- and down-regulating many homeostatic mechanisms in living organisms. Fibers from the SNS innervate tissues in almost every organ system, providing at least some regulatory function to things as diverse as pupil diameter, gut motility, and urinary output. This response is also known as sympatho-adrenal response of the body, as the preganglionic sympathetic fibers that end in the adrenal medulla (but also all other sympathetic fibers) secrete acetylcholine, which activates the secretion of adrenaline (epinephrine) and to a lesser extent noradrenaline (norepinephrine). Therefore, this response that acts primarily on the cardiovascular system is mediated directly via impulses transmitted through the sympathetic nervous system and indirectly via catecholamines secreted from the adrenal medulla.
Science typically looks at the SNS as an automatic regulation system, that is, one that operates without the intervention of conscious thought. Some evolutionary theorists suggest that the sympathetic nervous system operated in early organisms to maintain survival as the sympathetic nervous system is responsible for priming the body for action. One example of this priming is in the moments before waking, in which sympathetic outflow spontaneously increases in preparation for action.
1. The Sympathetic Chain
As shown in
In order to reach the target organs and glands, the axons should travel long distances in the body, and, to accomplish this, many axons relay their message to a second cell through synaptic transmission. The ends of the axons link across a space, the synapse, to the dendrites of the second cell. The first cell (the presynaptic cell) sends a neurotransmitter across the synaptic cleft where it activates the second cell (the postsynaptic cell). The message is then carried to the final destination.
In the SNS and other components of the peripheral nervous system, these synapses are made at sites called ganglia. The cell that sends its fiber is called a preganglionic cell, while the cell whose fiber leaves the ganglion is called a postganglionic cell. As mentioned previously, the preganglionic cells of the SNS are located between the first thoracic (T1) segment and third lumbar (L3) segments of the spinal cord. Postganglionic cells have their cell bodies in the ganglia and send their axons to target organs or glands.
The ganglia include not just the sympathetic trunks but also the cervical ganglia (superior, middle and inferior), which sends sympathetic nerve fibers to the head and thorax organs, and the celiac and mesenteric ganglia (which send sympathetic fibers to the gut).
2. Innervation of the Kidneys
As shown in
Preganglionic neuronal cell bodies are located in the intermediolateral cell column of the spinal cord. Preganglionic axons pass through the paravertebral ganglia (they do not synapse) to become the lesser splanchnic nerve, the least splanchnic nerve, first lumbar splanchnic nerve, second lumbar splanchnic nerve, and travel to the celiac ganglion, the superior mesenteric ganglion, and the aorticorenal ganglion. Postganglionic neuronal cell bodies exit the celiac ganglion, the superior mesenteric ganglion, and the aorticorenal ganglion to the renal plexus (RP) and are distributed to the renal vasculature.
3. Renal Sympathetic Neural Activity
Messages travel through the SNS in a bidirectional flow. Efferent messages may trigger changes in different parts of the body simultaneously. For example, the sympathetic nervous system may accelerate heart rate; widen bronchial passages; decrease motility (movement) of the large intestine; constrict blood vessels; increase peristalsis in the esophagus; cause pupil dilation, piloerection (goose bumps) and perspiration (sweating); and raise blood pressure. Afferent messages carry signals from various organs and sensory receptors in the body to other organs and, particularly, the brain.
Hypertension, heart failure and chronic kidney disease are a few of many disease states that result from chronic activation of the SNS, especially the renal sympathetic nervous system. Chronic activation of the SNS is a maladaptive response that drives the progression of these disease states. Pharmaceutical management of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) has been a longstanding, but somewhat ineffective, approach for reducing over-activity of the SNS.
As mentioned above, the renal sympathetic nervous system has been identified as a major contributor to the complex pathophysiology of hypertension, states of volume overload (such as heart failure), and progressive renal disease, both experimentally and in humans. Studies employing radiotracer dilution methodology to measure overflow of norepinephrine from the kidneys to plasma revealed increased renal norepinephrine (NE) spillover rates in patients with essential hypertension, particularly so in young hypertensive subjects, which in concert with increased NE spillover from the heart, is consistent with the hemodynamic profile typically seen in early hypertension and characterized by an increased heart rate, cardiac output, and renovascular resistance. It is now known that essential hypertension is commonly neurogenic, often accompanied by pronounced sympathetic nervous system overactivity.
Activation of cardiorenal sympathetic nerve activity is even more pronounced in heart failure, as demonstrated by an exaggerated increase of NE overflow from the heart and the kidneys to plasma in this patient group. In line with this notion is the recent demonstration of a strong negative predictive value of renal sympathetic activation on all-cause mortality and heart transplantation in patients with congestive heart failure, which is independent of overall sympathetic activity, glomerular filtration rate, and left ventricular ejection fraction. These findings support the notion that treatment regimens that are designed to reduce renal sympathetic stimulation have the potential to improve survival in patients with heart failure.
Both chronic and end stage renal disease are characterized by heightened sympathetic nervous activation. In patients with end stage renal disease, plasma levels of norepinephrine above the median have been demonstrated to be predictive for both all-cause death and death from cardiovascular disease. This is also true for patients suffering from diabetic or contrast nephropathy. There is compelling evidence suggesting that sensory afferent signals originating from the diseased kidneys are major contributors to initiating and sustaining elevated central sympathetic outflow in this patient group; this facilitates the occurrence of the well-known adverse consequences of chronic sympathetic over activity, such as hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, insulin resistance, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome.
(i) Renal Sympathetic Efferent Activity
Sympathetic nerves to the kidneys terminate in the blood vessels, the juxtaglomerular apparatus and the renal tubules. Stimulation of the renal sympathetic nerves causes increased renin release, increased sodium (Na+) reabsorption, and a reduction of renal blood flow. These components of the neural regulation of renal function are considerably stimulated in disease states characterized by heightened sympathetic tone and clearly contribute to the rise in blood pressure in hypertensive patients. The reduction of renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate as a result of renal sympathetic efferent stimulation is likely a cornerstone of the loss of renal function in cardio-renal syndrome, which is renal dysfunction as a progressive complication of chronic heart failure, with a clinical course that typically fluctuates with the patient's clinical status and treatment. Pharmacologic strategies to thwart the consequences of renal efferent sympathetic stimulation include centrally acting sympatholytic drugs, beta blockers (intended to reduce renin release), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and receptor blockers (intended to block the action of angiotensin II and aldosterone activation consequent to renin release) and diuretics (intended to counter the renal sympathetic mediated sodium and water retention). However, the current pharmacologic strategies have significant limitations including limited efficacy, compliance issues, side effects and others.
(ii) Renal Sensory Afferent Nerve Activity
The kidneys communicate with integral structures in the central nervous system via renal sensory afferent nerves. Several forms of “renal injury” may induce activation of sensory afferent signals. For example, renal ischemia, reduction in stroke volume or renal blood flow, or an abundance of adenosine enzyme may trigger activation of afferent neural communication. As shown in
The physiology therefore suggests that (i) modulation of tissue with efferent sympathetic nerves will reduce inappropriate renin release, salt retention, and reduction of renal blood flow, and that (ii) modulation of tissue with afferent sensory nerves will reduce the systemic contribution to hypertension and other disease states associated with increased central sympathetic tone through its direct effect on the posterior hypothalamus as well as the contralateral kidney. In addition to the central hypotensive effects of afferent renal denervation, a desirable reduction of central sympathetic outflow to various other sympathetically innervated organs such as the heart and the vasculature is anticipated.
B. Additional Clinical Benefits of Renal Denervation
As provided above, renal denervation is likely to be valuable in the treatment of several clinical conditions characterized by increased overall and particularly renal sympathetic activity such as hypertension, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic end stage renal disease, inappropriate fluid retention in heart failure, cardio-renal syndrome, and sudden death. Since the reduction of afferent neural signals contributes to the systemic reduction of sympathetic tone/drive, renal denervation might also be useful in treating other conditions associated with systemic sympathetic hyperactivity. Accordingly, renal denervation may also benefit other organs and bodily structures innervated by sympathetic nerves, including those identified in
C. Achieving Intravascular Access to the Renal Artery
In accordance with the present technology, neuromodulation of a left and/or right renal plexus (RP), which is intimately associated with a left and/or right renal artery, may be achieved through intravascular access. As
As
As will be described in greater detail later, the femoral artery may be accessed and cannulated at the base of the femoral triangle just inferior to the midpoint of the inguinal ligament. A catheter may be inserted percutaneously into the femoral artery through this access site, passed through the iliac artery and aorta, and placed into either the left or right renal artery. This comprises an intravascular path that offers minimally invasive access to a respective renal artery and/or other renal blood vessels.
The wrist, upper arm, and shoulder region provide other locations for introduction of catheters into the arterial system. For example, catheterization of either the radial, brachial, or axillary artery may be utilized in select cases. Catheters introduced via these access points may be passed through the subclavian artery on the left side (or via the subclavian and brachiocephalic arteries on the right side), through the aortic arch, down the descending aorta and into the renal arteries using standard angiographic technique.
D. Properties and Characteristics of the Renal Vasculature
Since neuromodulation of a left and/or right renal plexus (RP) may be achieved in accordance with the present technology through intravascular access, properties and characteristics of the renal vasculature may impose constraints upon and/or inform the design of apparatus, systems, and methods for achieving such renal neuromodulation. Some of these properties and characteristics may vary across the patient population and/or within a specific patient across time, as well as in response to disease states, such as hypertension, chronic kidney disease, vascular disease, end-stage renal disease, insulin resistance, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, etc. These properties and characteristics, as explained herein, may have bearing on the efficacy of the procedure and the specific design of the intravascular device. Properties of interest may include, for example, material/mechanical, spatial, fluid dynamic/hemodynamic and/or thermodynamic properties.
As discussed previously, a catheter may be advanced percutaneously into either the left or right renal artery via a minimally invasive intravascular path. However, minimally invasive renal arterial access may be challenging, for example, because as compared to some other arteries that are routinely accessed using catheters, the renal arteries are often extremely tortuous, may be of relatively small diameter, and/or may be of relatively short length. Furthermore, renal arterial atherosclerosis is common in many patients, particularly those with cardiovascular disease. Renal arterial anatomy also may vary significantly from patient to patient, which further complicates minimally invasive access. Significant inter-patient variation may be seen, for example, in relative tortuosity, diameter, length, and/or atherosclerotic plaque burden, as well as in the take-off angle at which a renal artery branches from the aorta. Apparatus, systems and methods for achieving renal neuromodulation via intravascular access should account for these and other aspects of renal arterial anatomy and its variation across the patient population when minimally invasively accessing a renal artery.
In addition to complicating renal arterial access, specifics of the renal anatomy also complicate establishment of stable contact between neuromodulatory apparatus and a luminal surface or wall of a renal artery. When the neuromodulatory apparatus includes an energy delivery element, such as an electrode, consistent positioning and appropriate contact force applied by the energy delivery element to the vessel wall are important for predictability. However, navigation is impeded by the tight space within a renal artery, as well as tortuosity of the artery. Furthermore, establishing consistent contact is complicated by patient movement, respiration, and/or the cardiac cycle because these factors may cause significant movement of the renal artery relative to the aorta, and the cardiac cycle may transiently distend the renal artery (i.e., cause the wall of the artery to pulse).
Even after accessing a renal artery and facilitating stable contact between neuromodulatory apparatus and a luminal surface of the artery, nerves in and around the adventia of the artery should be safely modulated via the neuromodulatory apparatus. Effectively applying thermal treatment from within a renal artery is non-trivial given the potential clinical complications associated with such treatment. For example, the intima and media of the renal artery are highly vulnerable to thermal injury. As discussed in greater detail below, the intima-media thickness separating the vessel lumen from its adventitia means that target renal nerves may be multiple millimeters distant from the luminal surface of the artery. Sufficient energy should be delivered to or heat removed from the target renal nerves to modulate the target renal nerves without excessively cooling or heating the vessel wall to the extent that the wall is frozen, desiccated, or otherwise potentially affected to an undesirable extent. A potential clinical complication associated with excessive heating is thrombus formation from coagulating blood flowing through the artery. Given that this thrombus may cause a kidney infarct, thereby causing irreversible damage to the kidney, thermal treatment from within the renal artery should be applied carefully. Accordingly, the complex fluid mechanics and thermodynamic conditions present in the renal artery during treatment, particularly those that may impact heat transfer dynamics at the treatment site, may be important in applying energy (e.g., heating thermal energy) and/or removing heat from the tissue (e.g., cooling thermal conditions) from within the renal artery.
The neuromodulatory apparatus should also be configured to allow for adjustable positioning and repositioning of the energy delivery element within the renal artery since location of treatment may also impact clinical efficacy. For example, it may be tempting to apply a full circumferential treatment from within the renal artery given that the renal nerves may be spaced circumferentially around a renal artery. In some situations, full-circle lesions likely resulting from a continuous circumferential treatment may be potentially related to renal artery stenosis. Therefore, the formation of more complex lesions along a longitudinal dimension of the renal artery via the mesh structures described herein and/or repositioning of the neuromodulatory apparatus to multiple treatment locations may be desirable. It should be noted, however, that a benefit of creating a circumferential ablation may outweigh the potential of renal artery stenosis or the risk may be mitigated with certain embodiments or in certain patients and creating a circumferential ablation could be a goal. Additionally, variable positioning and repositioning of the neuromodulatory apparatus may prove to be useful in circumstances where the renal artery is particularly tortuous or where there are proximal branch vessels off the renal artery main vessel, making treatment in certain locations challenging. Manipulation of a device in a renal artery should also consider mechanical injury imposed by the device on the renal artery. Motion of a device in an artery, for example by inserting, manipulating, negotiating bends and so forth, may contribute to dissection, perforation, denuding intima, or disrupting the interior elastic lamina.
Blood flow through a renal artery may be temporarily occluded for a short time with minimal or no complications. However, occlusion for a significant amount of time should be avoided to prevent injury to the kidney such as ischemia. It could be beneficial to avoid occlusion all together or, if occlusion is beneficial to the embodiment, to limit the duration of occlusion, for example to 2-5 minutes.
Based on the above described challenges of (1) renal artery intervention, (2) consistent and stable placement of the treatment element against the vessel wall, (3) effective application of treatment across the vessel wall, (4) positioning and potentially repositioning the treatment apparatus to allow for multiple treatment locations, and (5) avoiding or limiting duration of blood flow occlusion, various independent and dependent properties of the renal vasculature that may be of interest include, for example, (a) vessel diameter, vessel length, intima-media thickness, coefficient of friction, and tortuosity; (b) distensibility, stiffness and modulus of elasticity of the vessel wall; (c) peak systolic, end-diastolic blood flow velocity, as well as the mean systolic-diastolic peak blood flow velocity, and mean/max volumetric blood flow rate; (d) specific heat capacity of blood and/or of the vessel wall, thermal conductivity of blood and/or of the vessel wall, and/or thermal convectivity of blood flow past a vessel wall treatment site and/or radiative heat transfer; (e) renal artery motion relative to the aorta induced by respiration, patient movement, and/or blood flow pulsatility; and (f) the take-off angle of a renal artery relative to the aorta. These properties will be discussed in greater detail with respect to the renal arteries. However, dependent on the apparatus, systems and methods utilized to achieve renal neuromodulation, such properties of the renal arteries, also may guide and/or constrain design characteristics.
As noted above, an apparatus positioned within a renal artery should conform to the geometry of the artery. Renal artery vessel diameter, DRA, typically is in a range of about 2-10 mm, with most of the patient population having a DRA of about 4 mm to about 8 mm and an average of about 6 mm. Renal artery vessel length, LRA, between its ostium at the aorta/renal artery juncture and its distal branchings, generally is in a range of about 5-70 mm, and a significant portion of the patient population is in a range of about 20-50 mm. Since the target renal plexus is embedded within the adventitia of the renal artery, the composite Intima-Media Thickness, IMT, (i.e., the radial outward distance from the artery's luminal surface to the adventitia containing target neural structures) also is notable and generally is in a range of about 0.5-2.5 mm, with an average of about 1.5 mm. Although a certain depth of treatment is important to reach the target neural fibers, the treatment should not be too deep (e.g., >5 mm from inner wall of the renal artery) to avoid non-target tissue and anatomical structures such as the renal vein.
An additional property of the renal artery that may be of interest is the degree of renal motion relative to the aorta, induced by respiration and/or blood flow pulsatility. A patient's kidney, which located at the distal end of the renal artery, may move as much as 4″ cranially with respiratory excursion. This may impart significant motion to the renal artery connecting the aorta and the kidney, thereby requiring from the neuromodulatory apparatus a unique balance of stiffness and flexibility to maintain contact between the thermal treatment element and the vessel wall during cycles of respiration. Furthermore, the take-off angle between the renal artery and the aorta may vary significantly between patients, and also may vary dynamically within a patient, e.g., due to kidney motion. The take-off angle generally may be in a range of about 30°-135°.
The above detailed descriptions of embodiments of the technology are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the technology to the precise form disclosed above. Although specific embodiments of, and examples for, the technology are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the technology, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, while steps are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform steps in a different order. The various embodiments described herein may also be combined to provide further embodiments.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the technology have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but well-known structures and functions have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the embodiments of the technology. Where the context permits, singular or plural terms may also include the plural or singular term, respectively.
Certain aspects of the present technology may take the form of computer-executable instructions, including routines executed by a controller or other data processor. In some embodiments, a controller or other data processor is specifically programmed, configured, and/or constructed to perform one or more of these computer-executable instructions. Furthermore, some aspects of the present technology may take the form of data (e.g., non-transitory data) stored or distributed on computer-readable media, including magnetic or optically readable and/or removable computer discs as well as media distributed electronically over networks. Accordingly, data structures and transmissions of data particular to aspects of the present technology are encompassed within the scope of the present technology. The present technology also encompasses methods of both programming computer-readable media to perform particular steps and executing the steps.
Moreover, unless the word “or” is expressly limited to mean only a single item exclusive from the other items in reference to a list of two or more items, then the use of “or” in such a list is to be interpreted as including (a) any single item in the list, (b) all of the items in the list, or (c) any combination of the items in the list. Additionally, the term “comprising” is used throughout to mean including at least the recited feature(s) such that any greater number of the same feature and/or additional types of other features are not precluded. It will also be appreciated that specific embodiments have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the technology. Further, while advantages associated with certain embodiments of the technology have been described in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments may also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages to fall within the scope of the technology. Accordingly, the disclosure and associated technology can encompass other embodiments not expressly shown or described herein.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/801,091, filed Mar. 15, 2013, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4602624 | Naples et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4649936 | Ungar et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4709698 | Johnston et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4764504 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4770653 | Shturman | Sep 1988 | A |
4887605 | Angelsen et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4890623 | Cook et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4976711 | Parins et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5109859 | Jenkins | May 1992 | A |
5284153 | Raymond et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5295484 | Marcus et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300068 | Rosar et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5301683 | Durkan | Apr 1994 | A |
5304115 | Pflueger et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5358514 | Schulman et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5365172 | Hrovat et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368558 | Nita | Nov 1994 | A |
5368591 | Lennox et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372138 | Crowley et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5409000 | Imran | Apr 1995 | A |
5423744 | Gencheff et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425364 | Imran | Jun 1995 | A |
5484400 | Edwards et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5531520 | Grimson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5571147 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5573531 | Gregory | Nov 1996 | A |
5588964 | Imran et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599345 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601526 | Chapelon et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5626576 | Janssen | May 1997 | A |
5630837 | Crowley | May 1997 | A |
5672174 | Gough et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
RE35656 | Feinberg | Nov 1997 | E |
5688266 | Edwards et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700282 | Zabara | Dec 1997 | A |
5707400 | Terry, Jr. et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715819 | Svenson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5748347 | Erickson | May 1998 | A |
5772590 | Webster, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5797849 | Vesely et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5827203 | Nita | Oct 1998 | A |
5848969 | Panescu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860974 | Abele | Jan 1999 | A |
5865787 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5893885 | Webster et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904651 | Swanson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5944710 | Dev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954719 | Chen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957941 | Ream | Sep 1999 | A |
5967984 | Chu et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983141 | Sluijter et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6004269 | Crowley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009877 | Edwards | Jan 2000 | A |
6013033 | Berger et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6024740 | Lesh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033357 | Ciezki et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6036687 | Laufer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6066096 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066134 | Eggers et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079414 | Roth | Jun 2000 | A |
6083159 | Driscoll, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091995 | Ingle et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099524 | Lipson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117101 | Diederich et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120516 | Selmon et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6121775 | Pearlman | Sep 2000 | A |
6135999 | Fanton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142991 | Schatzberger | Nov 2000 | A |
6142993 | Whayne et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149620 | Baker et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161048 | Sluijter et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6191862 | Swanson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6200266 | Shokrollahi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219577 | Brown, III et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224592 | Eggers et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228076 | Winston et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238389 | Paddock et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246912 | Sluijter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273886 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283951 | Flaherty et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292695 | Webster, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296619 | Brisken et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309379 | Willard et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6314325 | Fitz | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322558 | Taylor et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6322559 | Daulton et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6346074 | Roth | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6364840 | Crowley | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389311 | Whayne et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394956 | Chandrasekaran et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6398780 | Farley et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405732 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6413255 | Stern | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421559 | Pearlman | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425867 | Vaezy et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6445939 | Swanson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447505 | McGovern et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6488679 | Swanson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506189 | Rittman, III et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514226 | Levin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517534 | McGovern et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522913 | Swanson et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6522926 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527765 | Kelman et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6542781 | Koblish et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546272 | MacKinnon et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549800 | Atalar et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6552796 | Magnin et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6562034 | Edwards et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6570659 | Schmitt | May 2003 | B2 |
6572551 | Smith et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6579311 | Makower | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6592526 | Lenker | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6616624 | Kieval | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622731 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6635054 | Fjield et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640120 | Swanson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6651672 | Roth | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6684098 | Oshio et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685648 | Flaherty et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6711429 | Gilboa et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711444 | Koblish | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716184 | Vaezy et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6736835 | Pellegrino et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6746401 | Panescu | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752805 | Maguire et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763261 | Casscells, III et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6770070 | Balbierz | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6797960 | Spartiotis et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6802857 | Walsh et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6823205 | Jara | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6845267 | Harrison et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6849075 | Bertolero et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6850801 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6869431 | Maguire et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885888 | Rezai | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6893436 | Woodard et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6895077 | Karellas et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898454 | Atalar et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6911026 | Hall et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6917834 | Koblish et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923808 | Taimisto | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939346 | Kannenberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949097 | Stewart et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6955175 | Stevens et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6986739 | Warren et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7041098 | Farley et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7087051 | Bourne et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100614 | Stevens et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112196 | Brosch et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7149574 | Yun et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7155271 | Halperin et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160296 | Pearson et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7162303 | Levin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7197354 | Sobe | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7201749 | Govari et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7221979 | Zhou et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238184 | Megerman et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7247141 | Makin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7280863 | Shachar | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7310150 | Guillermo et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7313430 | Urquhart et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7343195 | Strommer et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7381200 | Katoh et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7390894 | Weinshilboum et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7426409 | Casscells, III et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447453 | Kim et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7473224 | Makin | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7473890 | Grier et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7486805 | Krattiger | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7495439 | Wiggins | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7499745 | Littrup et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7507233 | Littrup et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7511494 | Wedeen | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7569052 | Phan et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7591996 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599730 | Hunter et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7603166 | Casscells, III et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7617005 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620451 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7646544 | Batchko et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7647115 | Levin et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7653438 | Deem et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7662114 | Seip et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7678106 | Lee | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7706882 | Francischelli et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7717853 | Nita | May 2010 | B2 |
7717948 | Demarais et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7722539 | Carter et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7725157 | Dumoulin et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7736317 | Stephens et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7758520 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766833 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7766878 | Tremaglio, Jr. et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7767844 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7769427 | Shachar | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7777486 | Hargreaves et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778703 | Gross et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7780660 | Bourne et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7789876 | Zikorus et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7792568 | Zhong et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7806871 | Li et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7811265 | Hering et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822460 | Halperin et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7857756 | Warren et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863897 | Slocum, Jr. et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7869854 | Shachar et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7956613 | Wald | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7962854 | Vance et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7983751 | Zdeblick et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8031927 | Karl et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043218 | Chapelon et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052604 | Lau et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8052636 | Moll et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8131371 | Demarais et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8131372 | Levin et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8133222 | Ormsby | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140170 | Rezai et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8145317 | Demarais et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8150518 | Levin et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150519 | Demarais et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8150520 | Demarais et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8172757 | Jaffe et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8175711 | Demarais et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190238 | Moll et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8192053 | Owen et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8197409 | Foley et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8198611 | LaFontaine et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8221407 | Phan et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241217 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260397 | Ruff et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277379 | Lau et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295912 | Gertner | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8317776 | Ferren et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8364237 | Stone et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8403881 | Ferren et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409172 | Moll et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8485992 | Griffin et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8585601 | Sverdlik | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8628473 | Sliwa | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8702619 | Wang | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8768470 | Deem et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8909316 | Ng | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8977359 | Rossing | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8986231 | Gertner | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9002446 | Wenzel et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9014809 | Wenzel et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9014821 | Wang | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9022948 | Wang | May 2015 | B2 |
9314300 | Nabutovsky et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9375154 | Wang | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9554850 | Lee et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9579030 | Scheuermann et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
20010007940 | Tu et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010051774 | Littrup et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020087208 | Koblish et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095197 | Lardo et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020107515 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020139379 | Edwards et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020165532 | Hill et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183682 | Darvish et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030028114 | Casscells et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050635 | Truckai et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050681 | Pianca et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060858 | Kieval et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069619 | Fenn et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074039 | Puskas | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030092995 | Thompson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125790 | Fastovsky et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030181897 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030199747 | Michlitsch et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199863 | Swanson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216792 | Levin et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229340 | Sherry et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233099 | Danaek et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040010289 | Biggs et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040111016 | Casscells et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040215186 | Cornelius et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040220556 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050080409 | Young et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096647 | Steinke et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050148842 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154277 | Tang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187579 | Danek et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203410 | Jenkins | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050228286 | Messerly et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228460 | Levin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050256398 | Hastings et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060083194 | Dhrimaj et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085054 | Zikorus et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095029 | Young et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060095096 | DeBenedictis et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060100618 | Chan et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122508 | Slayton et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149166 | Zvuloni | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167106 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171895 | Bucay-Couto | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206150 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239921 | Mangat et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060271111 | Demarais et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070027390 | Maschke et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049924 | Rahn | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073151 | Lee | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070093710 | Maschke | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100405 | Thompson et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106247 | Burnett et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112327 | Yun et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129720 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070197891 | Shachar et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208256 | Marilla | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070208301 | Evard et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239062 | Chopra et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070265687 | Deem et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070278103 | Hoerr et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080039746 | Hissong et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080039830 | Munger et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080071269 | Hilario et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082109 | Moll et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091104 | Abraham | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080091193 | Kauphusman et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080108867 | Zhou | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125772 | Stone | May 2008 | A1 |
20080161662 | Golijanin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080221448 | Khuri-Yakub et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080294037 | Richter | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080312673 | Viswanathan et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319513 | Pu et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090030312 | Hadjicostis | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036948 | Levin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069671 | Anderson | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090118620 | Tgavalekos et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125099 | Weber et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131789 | Fehre et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131798 | Minar et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090143640 | Saadat et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156988 | Ferren et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090157057 | Ferren et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090198223 | Thilwind et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090203962 | Miller et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090203993 | Mangat et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090240249 | Chan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090270850 | Zhou et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100030061 | Canfield et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100087782 | Ghaffari et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100106005 | Karczmar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100130836 | Malchano et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137860 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137952 | Demarais et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100168624 | Sliwa | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100191112 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217162 | Hissong et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100222851 | Deem et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100222854 | Demarais et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249604 | Hastings et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110009750 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110021976 | Li et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110071400 | Hastings et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071401 | Hastings et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110087100 | Grossman | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110112400 | Emery et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110144479 | Hastings et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110146673 | Keast et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110178403 | Weng et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110257523 | Hastings et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257641 | Hastings et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110257642 | Griggs, III | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110270120 | McFarlin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110306851 | Wang | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120029504 | Afonso et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120059241 | Hastings et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065506 | Smith | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120095335 | Sverdlik et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120123400 | Francischelli et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130289 | Demarais et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130345 | Levin et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120143097 | Pike, Jr. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172837 | Demarais et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120172870 | Jenson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120184850 | Gutierrez et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191079 | Moll et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120209261 | Mayse | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120296232 | Ng | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296329 | Ng | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130023865 | Steinke et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130066316 | Steinke et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085489 | Fain et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130123778 | Richardson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130165764 | Scheuermann et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172878 | Smith | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130218029 | Cholette et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130274614 | Shimada et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130282001 | Hezi-Yamit et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140012133 | Sverdlik et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025069 | Willard | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140066803 | Choi | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140073903 | Weber et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074089 | Nishii | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140128865 | Gross | May 2014 | A1 |
20140135715 | Lambert et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163360 | Stevens-Wright et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140163372 | Deladi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140165764 | Moon et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180077 | Huennekens et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180197 | Sverdlik et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140180273 | Nair | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140188103 | Millett | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140194866 | Wang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140213873 | Wang | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140221805 | Wang | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140246465 | Peterson et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140249524 | Kocur | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140266235 | Mathur | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140275924 | Min et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276124 | Cholette et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276733 | VanScoy et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276742 | Nabutovsky et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276746 | Nabutovsky et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276755 | Cao et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276762 | Parsonage | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276766 | Brotz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276767 | Brotz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276773 | Brotz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140316400 | Blix et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316496 | Masson et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140330267 | Harrington | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140336637 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150005764 | Hanson et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150025524 | Nabutovsky | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150112329 | Ng | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119674 | Fischell et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150173673 | Toth et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150201997 | Osypka | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150216590 | Wang et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150223877 | Behar et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150224326 | Toth et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150289770 | Wang | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150289929 | Toth et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150366609 | Richardson et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160000345 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160029960 | Toth et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160038028 | Buelna et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160081744 | Wang | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160324572 | Gross et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160331451 | Nabutovsky et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160331453 | Fain et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160374568 | Wang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10038737 | Feb 2002 | DE |
102005041601 | Apr 2007 | DE |
1169976 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1181895 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1579889 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1634542 | Mar 2006 | EP |
1906853 | Apr 2008 | EP |
2197533 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2316371 | May 2011 | EP |
2320821 | May 2011 | EP |
2378956 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2460486 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2594193 | May 2013 | EP |
2613704 | Jul 2013 | EP |
2747691 | Jul 2014 | EP |
2797535 | Nov 2014 | EP |
2852339 | Apr 2015 | EP |
2866645 | May 2015 | EP |
2887900 | Jul 2015 | EP |
2907464 | Aug 2015 | EP |
2914334 | Sep 2015 | EP |
2967383 | Jan 2016 | EP |
2978372 | Feb 2016 | EP |
3178428 | Jun 2017 | EP |
3178432 | Jun 2017 | EP |
H08504531 | May 1996 | JP |
H1071037 | Mar 1998 | JP |
2001518808 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2005278739 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2008515544 | May 2008 | JP |
2009539565 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010162163 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2010533513 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2011505929 | Mar 2011 | JP |
WO-2014091328 | Jul 1989 | WO |
WO-199407446 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO-9501751 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO-1995025472 | Sep 1995 | WO |
WO-9531142 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO-1997036548 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 1998042403 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO-9858588 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-199900060 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO-9900060 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO-9916370 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-0059394 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO-2001022897 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-2001070114 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-02089686 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO-2003022167 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO-03026525 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO-2003082080 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO-2004110258 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO-2005030072 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO-2005041748 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2005110528 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO-2006041881 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006105121 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2006116256 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2006116198 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007008954 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007078997 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2008003058 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008049084 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO-2008102363 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO-2009036471 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO-2009137819 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO-2010009452 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2010011763 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO-2010042653 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO-2010078175 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2010102310 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO-2011089935 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO-2012033974 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012068471 | May 2012 | WO |
WO-2012103108 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO-2012158864 | Nov 2012 | WO |
WO-2013009977 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013030738 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013030743 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013074813 | May 2013 | WO |
WO-2013101485 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO-2013112844 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2014012282 | Jan 2014 | WO |
WO-2014029355 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO-2014059165 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO-2014068577 | May 2014 | WO |
WO-2014089380 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2014091401 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2014100226 | Jun 2014 | WO |
WO-2014149552 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014149553 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014149690 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014149550 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014150425 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014150432 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014150441 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014150455 | Sep 2014 | WO |
WO-2014158713 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO-2014158708 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO-2014163990 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO-2014179768 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO-2014182946 | Nov 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Beale et al., “Minimally Invasive Treatment for Varicose Veins: A Review of Endovenous Laser Treatment and Radiofrequency Ablation”. Lower Extremity Wounds 3(4), 2004, 10 pages. |
Miller, Reed, “Finding a Future for Renal Denervation With Better Controlled Trials.” Pharma & Medtech Business Intelligence, Article # 01141006003, Oct. 6, 2014, 4 pages. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios, “Renal Denervation and Symplicity HTN-3: “Dubium Sapientiae Initium” (Doubt is the Beginning of Wisdom)”, Circulation Research, 2014; 115: 211-214. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: How Did We Get Here, Present Status, and Future Directions.” Circulation. 2014; 129: 1440-1450. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: 12-Month Results of the EnligHTN I First-in-Human Study Using a Multielectrode Ablation System.” Hypertension. 2014; 64: 565-572. |
Doumas, Michael et al., “Renal Nerve Ablation for Resistant Hypertension: The Dust Has Not Yet Settled.” The Journal of Clinical Hypertension. 2014; vol. 16, No. 6, 2 pages. |
Messerli, Franz H. et al. “Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: Dead or Alive?” Healio: Cardiology today's Intervention, May/Jun. 2014, 2 pages. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 13159256, dated Oct. 17, 2013, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/029860, dated May 26, 2014, 13 pages. |
Chinushi et al., “Blood Pressure and Autonomic Responses to Electrical Stimulation of the Renal Arterial Nerves Before and After Ablation of the Renal Artery.” Hypertension, 2013, 61, pp. 450-456. |
Pokushalov et al., “A Randomized Comparison of Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Versus Without Concomitant Renal Artery Denervation in Patients With Refractory Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation and Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012, 8 pages. |
“2011 Edison Award Winners.” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2011, 6 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/BestNewProduct_2011.php>. |
“2012 top 10 advances in heart disease and stroke research: American Heart Association/America Stroke Association Top 10 Research Report.” American Heart Association, Dec. 17, 2012, 5 pages, <http://newsroom.heart.org/news/2012-top-10-advances-in-heart-241901>. |
“Ardian(R) Receives 2010 EuroPCR Innovation Award and Demonstrates Further Durability of Renal Denervation Treatment for Hypertension.” PR Newswire, Jun. 3, 2010, 2 pages, <http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ardianr-receives-2010-europer-innovation-award-and-demonstrates-further-durability-of-renal-denervation-treatment-for-hypertension-95545014.html>. |
“Boston Scientific to Acquire Vessix Vascular, Inc.: Company to Strengthen Hypertension Program with Acquisition of Renal Denervation Technology.” Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life-Investor Relations, Nov. 8, 2012, 2 pages, <http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=62272&p=irol-newsArticle&id=1756108>. |
“Cleveland Clinic Unveils Top 10 Medical Innovations for 2012: Experts Predict Ten Emerging Technologies that will Shape Health Care Next Year.” Cleveland Clinic, Oct. 6, 2011, 2 pages. <http://my.clevelandclinic.org/media_relations/library/2011/2011-10-6-cleveland-clinic-unveils-top-10-medical-innovations-for-2012.aspx>. |
“Does renal denervation represent a new treatment option for resistant hypertension?” Interventional News, Aug. 3, 2010, 2 pages. <http://www.cxvascular.com/in-latest-news/interventional-news---latest-news/does-renal-denervation-represent-a-new-treatment-option-for-resistant-hypertension>. |
“Iberis—Renal Sympathetic Denervation System: Turning innovation into quality care.” [Brochure], Terumo Europe N.V., 2013, Europe, 3 pages. |
“Neurotech Reports Announces Winners of Gold Electrode Awards.” Neurotech business report, 2009. 1 page. <http://www.neurotechreports.com/pages/goldelectrodes09.html>. |
“Quick. Consistent. Controlled. OneShot renal Denervation System” [Brochure], Covidien: positive results for life, 2013, (n.l.), 4 pages. |
“Renal Denervation Technology of Vessix Vascular, Inc. been acquired by Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) to pay up to $425 Million.” Vessix Vascular Pharmaceutical Intelligence: A blog specializing in Pharmaceutical Intelligence and Analytics, Nov. 8, 2012, 21 pages, <http://pharmaceuticalintelligence.com/tag/vessix-vascular/>. |
“The Edison Awards™” Edison Awards: Honoring Innovations & Innovators, 2013, 2 pages, <http://www.edisonawards.com/Awards.php>. |
“The Future of Renal denervation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension.” St. Jude Medical, Inc., 2012, 12 pages. |
“Vessix Renal Denervation System: So Advanced It's Simple.” [Brochure], Boston Scientific: Advancing science for life, 2013, 6 pages. |
Asbell, Penny, “Conductive Keratoplasty for the Correction of Hyperopia.” Tr Am Ophth Soc, 2001, vol. 99, 10 pages. |
Badoer, Emilio, “Cardiac afferents play the dominant role in renal nerve inhibition elicited by volume expansion in the rabbit.” Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, vol. 274, 1998, 7 pages. |
Bengel, Frank, “Serial Assessment of Sympathetic Reinnervation After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: A longitudinal Study Using PET and C-11 Hydroxyephedrine.” Circulation, vol. 99, 1999,7 pages. |
Benito, F., et al. “Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways in infants.” Heart, 78:160-162 (1997). |
Bettmann, Michael, Carotid Stenting and Angioplasty: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Stroke, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association, Circulation, vol. 97, 1998, 4 pages. |
Bohm, Michael et al., “Rationale and design of a large registry on renal denervation: the Global Symplicity registry.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Brosky, John, “EuroPCR 2013: CE-approved devices line up for renal denervation approval.” Medical Device Daily, May 28, 2013, 3 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines_article&forceid=83002>. |
Davis, Mark et al., “Effectiveness of Renal Denervation Therapy for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 62, No. 3, 2013, 11 pages. |
Dibona, G.F. “Sympathetic nervous system and kidney in hypertension.” Nephrol and Hypertension, 11: 197-200 (2002). |
Dubuc, M., et al., “Feasibility of cardiac cryoablation using a transvenous steerable electrode catheter.” J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol, 2:285-292 (1998). |
Final Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 12/827,700; dated Feb. 5, 2013, 61 pages. |
Geisler, Benjamin et al., “Cost-Effectiveness and Clinical Effectiveness of Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, col. 60, No. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
Gelfand, M., et al., “Treatment of renal failure and hypertension.” U.S. Appl. No. 60/442,970, filed Jan. 29, 2003, 23 pages. |
Gertner, Jon, “Meet the Tech Duo That's Revitalizing the Medical Device Industry.” Fast Company, Apr. 15, 2013, 6:00 am, 17 pages, <http://www.fastcompany.com/3007845/meet-tech-duo-thats-revitalizing-medical-device-industry>. |
Golwyn, D. H., Jr., et al. “Percutaneous Transcatheter Renal Ablation with Absolute Ethanol for Uncontrolled Hypertension or Nephrotic Syndrome: Results in 11 Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.” JVIR, 8: 527-533 (1997). |
Hall, W. H., et al. “Combined embolization and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of a solid renal tumor.” Am. J. Roentgenol,174: 1592-1594 (2000). |
Han, Y.-M, et al., “Renal artery ebolization with diluted hot contrast medium: An experimental study.” J Vasc Interv Radiol, 12: 862-868 (2001). |
Hansen, J. M., et al. “The transplanted human kidney does not achieve functional reinnervation.” Clin. Sci, 87: 13-19 (1994). |
Hendee, W. R. et al. “Use of Animals in Biomedical Research The Challenge and Response.” American Medical Association White Paper (1988) 39 pages. |
Hering, Dagmara et al., “Chronic kidney disease: role of sympathetic nervous system activation and potential benefits of renal denervation.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Huang et al., “Renal denervation prevents and reverses hyperinsulinemia-induced hypertension in rats.” Hypertension 32 (1998) pp. 249-254. |
Imimdtanz, “Medtronic awarded industry's highest honour for renal denervation system.” The official blog of Medtronic Australasia, Nov. 12, 2012, 2 pages, <http://97waterlooroad.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/medtronic-awarded-industrys-highest-honour-for-renal-denervation-system/>. |
Kaiser, Chris, AHA Lists Year's Big Advances in CV Research, medpage Today, Dec. 18, 2012, 4 pages, <http://www.medpagetoday.com/Cardiology/PCI/36509>. |
Kompanowska, E., et al., “Early Effects of renal denervation in the anaesthetised rat: Natriuresis and increased cortical blood flow.” J Physiol, 531. 2:527-534 (2001). |
Lee, S.J., et al. “Ultrasonic energy in endoscopic surgery.” Yonsei Med J, 40:545-549 (1999). |
Linz, Dominik et al., “Renal denervation suppresses ventricular arrhythmias during acute ventricular ischemia in pigs.” Heart Rhythm, vol. 0, No. 0, 2013, 6 pages. |
Lustgarten, D.L.,et al., “Cryothermal ablation: Mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias.” Progr Cardiovasc Dis, 41:481-498 (1999). |
Mabin, Tom et al., “First experience with endovascular ultrasound renal denervation for the treatment of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2012, 5 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Ambulatory Blood Pressure Changes after Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Circulation, 2013, 25 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Expert consensus document from the European Society of Cardiology on catheter-based renal denervation.” European Heart Journal, 2013, 9 pages. |
Mahfoud, Felix et al., “Renal Hemodynamics and Renal Function After Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients With Resistant Hypertension.” Hypertension, 2012, 6 pages. |
Medical-Dictionary.com, Definition of “Animal Model,” http://medical-dictionary.com (search “Animal Model”), 2005, 1 page. |
Medtronic, Inc., Annual Report (Form 10-K) (Jun. 28, 2011) 44 pages. |
Millard, F. C., et al, “Renal Embolization for ablation of function in renal failure and hypertension.” Postgraduate Medical Journal, 65, 729-734, (1989). |
Oliveira, V., et al., “Renal denervation normalizes pressure and baroreceptor reflex in high renin hypertension in conscious rats.” Hypertension, 19:II-17-II-21 (1992). |
Ong, K. L., et al. “Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension Among United States Adults 1999-2004.” Hypertension, 49: 69-75 (2007) (originally published online Dec. 11, 2006). |
Ormiston, John et al., “First-in-human use of the OneShot™ renal denervation system from Covidien.” EuroIntervention, vol. 8, 2013, 4 pages. |
Ormiston, John et al., “Renal denervation for resistant hypertension using an irrigated radiofrequency balloon: 12-month results from the Renal Hypertension Ablation System (RHAS) trial.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 5 pages. |
Pedersen, Amanda, “TCT 2012: Renal denervation device makers play show and tell.” Medical Device Daily, Oct. 26, 2012, 2 pages, <http://www.medicaldevicedaily.com/servlet/com.accumedia.web.Dispatcher?next=bioWorldHeadlines_article&forceid=80880>. |
Peet, M., “Hypertension and its Surgical Treatment by bilateral supradiaphragmatic splanchnicectomy” Am J Surgery (1948) pp. 48-68. |
Renal Denervation (RDN), Symplicity RDN System Common Q&A (2011), 4 pages, http://www.medtronic.com/rdn/mediakit/RDN%20FAQ.pdf. |
Schauerte, P., et al. “Catheter ablation of cardiac autonomic nerves for prevention of vagal atrial fibrillation.” Circulation, 102:2774-2780 (2000). |
Schlaich, Markus et al., “Renal Denervation in Human Hypertension: Mechanisms, Current Findings, and Future Prospects.” Curr Hypertens Rep, vol. 14, 2012, 7 pages. |
Schmid, Axel et al., “Does Renal Artery Supply Indicate Treatment Success of Renal Denervation.” Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, vol. 36, 2013, 5 pages. |
Schmieder, Roland E. et al., “Updated ESH position paper on interventional therapy of resistant hypertension.” EuroIntervention, vol. 9, 2013, 9 pages. |
Sievert, Horst, “Novelty Award EuroPCR 2010.” Euro PCR, 2010, 15 pages. |
Solis-Herruzo et al., “Effects of lumbar sympathetic block on kidney function in cirrhotic patients with hepatorenal syndrome,” J. Hepatol. 5 (1987), pp. 167-173. |
Stella, A., et al., “Effects of reversible renal deneravation on haemodynamic and excretory functions on the ipsilateral and contralateral kidney in the cat.” Hypertension, 4:181-188 (1986). |
Stouffer, G. A. et al., Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 62, 2013, 6 pages. |
Swartz, J.F., et al., “Radiofrequency endocardial catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathway atrial insertion sites.” Circulation, 87: 487-499 (1993). |
Uchida, F., et al., “Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on parasympathetic denervation: A comparison of three different ablation sites.” PACE, 21:2517-2521 (1998). |
Verloop, W. L. et al., “Renal denervation: a new treatment option in resistant arterial hypertension.” Neth Heart J., Nov. 30, 2012, 6 pages, <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3547427/>. |
Weinstock, M., et al., “Renal denervation prevents sodium rentention and hypertension in salt sensitive rabbits with genetic baroreflex impairment.” Clinical Science, 90:287-293 (1996). |
Wilcox, Josiah N., Scientific Basis Behind Renal Denervation for the Control of Hypertension, ICI 2012, Dec. 5-6, 2012. 38 pages. |
Worthley, Stephen et al., “Safety and efficacy of a multi-electrode renal sympathetic denervation system in resistant hypertension: the EnligHTN I trial.” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, 2013, 9 pages. |
Worthley, Stephen, “The St. Jude Renal Denervation System Technology and Clinical Review.” The University of Adelaide Australia, 2012, 24 pages. |
Zuern, Christine S., “Impaired Cardiac Baroflex Sensitivity Predicts Response to Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Resistant Hypertension.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.046, 24 pages. |
Ahmed, Humera et al., Renal Sympathetic Denervation Using an Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter for the Management of Drug-Resistant Hypertension, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 5, No. 7, 2012, pp. 758-765. |
Avitall et al., “The creation of linear contiguous lesions in the atria with an expandable loop catheter,”Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999; 33; pp. 972-984. |
Blessing, Erwin et al., Cardiac Ablation and Renal Denervation Systems Have Distinct Purposes and Different Technical Requirements, JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, No. 3, 2013, 1 page. |
ClinicalTrials.gov, Renal Denervation in Patients with uncontrolled Hypertension in Chinese (2011), 6pages. www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01390831. |
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's EPT-1000 XP Cardiac Ablation Controller & Accessories, Version of Apr. 2003, (6 pages). |
Excerpt of Operator's Manual of Boston Scientific's Maestro 30000 Cardiac Ablation System, Version of Oct. 17, 2005 , (4 pages). |
Holmes et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Spectrum and Interventional Considerations, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2: 4, 2009, 10 pages. |
Kandarpa, Krishna et al., “Handbook of Interventional Radiologic Procedures”, Third Edition, pp. 194-210 (2002). |
Mount Sinai School of Medicine clinical trial for Impact of Renal Sympathetic Denervation of Chronic Hypertension, Mar. 2013, 11 pages. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01628198. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP1802370, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 20 pages. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2037840, Granted Dec. 7, 2011, Date of Opposition Sep. 7, 2012, 25 pages. |
Opposition to European Patent No. EP2092957, Granted Jan. 5, 2011, Date of Opposition Oct. 5, 2011, 26 pages. |
Oz, Mehmet, Pressure Relief, Time, Jan. 9, 2012, 2 pages. <www.time.come/time/printout/0,8816,2103278,00.html>. |
Papademetriou, Vasilios, Renal Sympathetic Denervation for the Treatment of Difficult-to-Control or Resistant Hypertension, Int. Journal of Hypertension, 2011, 8 pages. |
Prochnau, Dirk et al., Catheter-based renal denervation for drug-resistant hypertension by using a standard electrophysiology catheter; Euro Intervention 2012, vol. 7, pp. 1077-1080. |
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Incidence, Management, and Outcome in Significant Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Complicating Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation, Am. J. Cardiol , 93, Jun. 1, 2004, 4 pages. |
Purerfellner, Helmut et al., Pulmonary Vein Stenosis Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Curr. Opin. Cardio. 20 :484-490, 2005. |
Schneider, Peter A., “Endovascular Skills—Guidewire and Catheter Skills for Endovascular Surgery,” Second Edition Revised and Expanded, 10 pages, (2003). |
ThermoCool Irrigated Catheter and Integrated Ablation System, Biosense Webster (2006), 6 pages. |
Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Evaluation of Pulmonary Vein Stenosis after Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Electrophysiology Review, 6, 2002, 4 pages. |
Wittkampf et al., “Control of radiofrequency lesion size by power regulation,” Journal of the American Heart Associate, 1989, 80: pp. 962-968. |
Zheng et al., “Comparison of the temperature profile and pathological effect at unipolar, bipolar and phased radiofrequency current configurations,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2001, pp. 401-410. |
Allen, E.V., Sympathectomy for essential hypertension, Circulation, 1952, 6:131-140. |
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Acute Unilateral Renal Denervation in the Rat,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 56, Jul. 1975, pp. 208-217. |
Bello-Reuss, E. et al., “Effects of Renal Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation on Proximal Water and Sodium Reabsorption,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 57, Apr. 1976, pp. 1104-1107. |
Bhandari, A. and Ellias, M., “Loin Pain Hemaluria Syndrome: Pain Control with RFA to the Splanchanic Plexus,” The Pain Clinc, 2000, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 323-327. |
Curtis, John J. et al., “Surgical Therapy for Persistent Hypertension After Renal Transplantation” Transplantation, 31:125-128 (1981). |
Dibona, Gerald F. et al., “Neural Control of Renal Function,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 77, No. 1, Jan. 1997, The American Physiological Society 1997, pp. 75-197. |
Dibona, Gerald F., “Neural Control of the Kidney—Past, Present and Future,” Nov. 4, 2002, Novartis Lecture, Hypertension 2003, 41 part 2, 2002 American Heart Association, Inc., pp. 621-624. |
Janssen, Ben J.A. et al., “Effects of Complete Renal Denervation and Selective Afferent Renal Denervation on the Hypertension Induced by Intrenal Norepinephrine Infusion in Conscious Rats”, Journal of Hypertension 1989, 7: 447-455. |
Katholi, Richard E., “Renal Nerves in the Pathogenesis of Hypertension in Experimental Animals and Humans,” Am J. Physiol. vol. 245, 1983, the American Physiological Society 1983, pp. F1-F14. |
Krum, Henry et al., “Catheter-Based Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: A Mulitcentre Safety and Proof-of Principle Cohort Study,” Lancet 2009; 373:1275-81. |
Krum, et al., “Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension.” New England Journal of Med, Aug. 2009, 361;9. |
Luippold, Gerd et al., “Chronic Renal Denervation Prevents Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Diabetic Rats”, Nephrol Dial Transplant, vol. 19, No. 2, 2004, pp. 342-347. |
Mahfoud et al. “Treatment strategies for resistant arterial hypertension” Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011;108:725-731. |
Osborn, et al., “Effect of Renal Nerve Stimulation on Renal Blood Flow Autoregulation and Antinatriuresis During Reductions in Renal Perfusion Pressure,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimentla Biology and Medicine, vol. 168, 77-81, 1981. |
Page, I.H. et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on Patients Suffering From Nephritis,” Feb. 27, 1935;443-458. |
Page, I.H. et al., “The Effect of Renal Denervation on the Level of Arterial Blood Pressure and Renal Function in Essential Hypertension,” J. Clin Invest. 1934;14:27-30. |
Rocha-Singh, “Catheter-Based Sympathetic Renal Denervation,” Endovascular Today, Aug. 2009. |
Schlaich, M.P. et al., “Renal Denervation as a Therapeutic Approach for Hypertension: Novel Implictions for an Old Concept,” Hypertension, 2009; 54:1195-1201. |
Schlaich, M.P. et al., “Renal Sympathetic-Nerve Ablation for Uncontrolled Hypertension,” N Engl J Med 2009; 361(9): 932-934. |
Smithwick, R.H. et al., “Splanchnicectomy for Essential Hypertension,” Journal Am Med Assn, 1953; 152:1501-1504. |
Symplicity HTN-1 Investigators; Krum H, Barman N, Schlaich M, et al. Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: durability of blood pressure reduction out to 24 months. Hypertension. 2011 ;57(5):911-917. |
Symplicity HTN-2 Investigators, “Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension (The Symplicity HTN-2 Trial): A Randomised Controlled Trial”; Lancet, Dec. 4, 2010, vol. 376, pp. 1903-1909. |
United States Renal Data System, USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, 2003, 593 pages. |
Valente, John F. et al., “Laparoscopic Renal Denervation for Intractable ADPKD-Related Pain”, Nephrol Dial Transplant (2001) 16:160. |
Wagner, C.D. et al., “Very Low Frequency Oscillations in Arterial Blood Pressure After Autonomic Blockade in Conscious Dogs,” Feb. 5, 1997, Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 1997, vol. 272, 1997 the American Physiological Society, pp. 2034-2039. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/029860, dated May 26, 2014 12 pages. |
Dodge, et al., “Lumen Diameter of Normal Human Coronary Arteries Influence of Age, Sex, Anatomic Variation, and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy or Dilation”, Circulation, 1992, vol. 86 (1), 232-246 pp. |
Opposition to European U.S. Pat. No. 2,465,470, Granted Oct. 28, 2015, Date of Opposition Jul. 27, 2016, 34 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,867, filed Feb. 27, 2006, 70 pp. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/813,589, filed Dec. 29, 2005, 62 pp. |
Ureter, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ureter, Jun. 2016, 6 pp. |
Pieper et al., “Design and Implementation of a New Computerized System for Intraoperative Cardiac Mapping.” Journal of Applied Physiology, 1991, vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 1529-1539. |
Remo, Benjamin F. et al., “Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation as a Novel Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia Storm in Patients with Cardiomyopathy.” Heart Rhythm, 2014, 11(4), 541-6. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/852,787, filed Oct. 18, 2006, 112 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140316402 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61801091 | Mar 2013 | US |