1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates in general to the field of electronics, and more specifically to a method and system for controlling energy dissipation in a switching power converter.
2. Description of the Related Art
Switching power converters convert power received from a power source, such as a voltage supply, into power suitable for a load. The power received from the voltage supply is referred to as “POWER IN”, and the power provided to the load is referred to as “POWER OUT”. All switching power converters have some inherent power losses due to, for example, non-ideal component characteristics. Such inherent power losses tend to be minimized so as to increase the efficiency of the switching power converters. Inherent power losses are represented herein by “PINH”. In some contexts the amount of power supplied to the switching power converter can exceed the amount of power provided by the switching power converter to a load, i.e. POWER IN>POWER OUT+PINH. When the POWER IN is greater than the POWER OUT+PINH, the switching power converter passively dissipates the excess energy using passive resistors.
A dimmable lighting system that includes a low power lamp, such as one or more light emitting diodes (LEDs), represents one context when the POWER IN to the switching power converter can be greater than the POWER OUT PINH of the switching power converter. In this exemplary context, the switching power converter receives current through a triode for alternating current (“triac”) based dimmer. Once a triac-based dimmer begins conducting during a cycle of an alternating current (“AC”) supply voltage to prevent the triac from disadvantageously, prematurely disconnecting during mid-cycle of the supply voltage, the switching power converter draws a minimum current referred to as a “hold current”. As long as an input current to the switching power converter is greater than or equal to the hold current, the triac-based dimmer should not prematurely disconnect. For a leading edge dimmer, a premature disconnect occurs when the dimmer begins conducting and stops conducting prior to reaching a zero crossing of the supply voltage. Premature disconnects can cause problems with the lighting system, such as flicker and instability.
Thus, to prevent premature disconnection of the triac-based dimmer, the minimum POWER IN to the switching power converter equals the hold current (“iHOLD”) times an input voltage “VIN” to the switching power converter. Conventional triac-based dimmers were designed to provide power to incandescent light bulbs. For desired dimming levels, an incandescent light bulb generally draws a current at least equal to the hold current for all usable dimming levels. However, other lamps, such as LEDs are more efficient than incandescent light bulbs in terms of power versus light output and, thus, provide equivalent light output while using less power than an incandescent light bulb. Thus, lighting systems with LEDs typically utilize less power and less current than incandescent bulbs. To balance the power when the lighting system draws more POWER IN than the lighting system inherently dissipates and provides as POWER OUT to the lamp, the lighting system utilizes one or more passive resistors to internally dissipate excess power.
The input signal voltage Vφ
The phase cut dimmer 102 supplies the input voltage Vφ
The switching power converter 108 is a boost-type converter, and, thus, the link voltage VLINK is greater than the rectified input voltage VφR
Referring to
The switching power converter 108 includes a power dissipation resistor 128 so that the dimmer current iDIM does not fall below the hold current value and prematurely disconnect during a cycle of the rectified input voltage VφR
Because of component non-idealities, the switching power converter 108 includes inherent power losses Inherent power losses include conductor resistances and switching losses in switch 112. However, circuits are generally designed to minimize inherent power losses, and these inherent power losses are often negligible and, thus, insufficient to dissipate enough power to compensate for the difference between the POWER IN and the POWER OUT+PINH at some POWER OUT levels. To increase the power loss of switching power converter so that the dimmer current iDIM remains above a hold current value even at lower power demand by the lamp 122, switching power converter 108 includes the resistor 128 to create a passive power loss when switch 112 conducts the inductor current iL. For negligible inherent power losses, the resistance value of the resistor 128 is selected so that when the switching power converter is providing a minimum link current iLINK, the POWER IN=POWER OUT+PINH+PASSIVE POWER DISSIPATE.
Resistor 128 is relatively cheap to implement as part of switching power converter 108. However, when the link current iLINK is sufficiently high such that POWER IN equals POWER OUT+PINH, the dimmer input current iDIM could be maintained above the hold current value without dissipating power through resistor 128. However, since the dimmer input current iDIM always flows through the resistor 128 when the switch 108 is conducts, the resistor 128 still passively dissipates power regardless of whether the POWER IN is equal to the POWER OUT+PINH, which decreases the efficiency of lighting system 100.
In one embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus includes a controller configured to control a boost switch in a switching power converter of a phase cut compatible, dimmable lighting system. The controller is configured to control a power dissipation circuit to control dissipation of excess energy by at least the boost switch during a controlled power dissipation phase. The controlled power dissipation phase occurs after a charging phase begins and before an end of a subsequent flyback phase of the switching power converter.
In another embodiment of the present invention, an apparatus includes a controller configured to control a boost switch in a switching power converter of a phase cut compatible, dimmable lighting system. The controller is configured to control the boost switch in an efficient mode and a power dissipation mode. In the efficient mode, the controller is configured to operate the boost switch to minimize power dissipation in the boost switch. In the power dissipation mode the controller is configured to operate the boost switch to increase dissipation of energy in the boost switch relative to any power dissipation in the boost switch during operation in the efficient mode.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, a method includes controlling a boost switch in a switching power converter of a phase cut compatible, dimmable lighting system during a power dissipation phase to dissipate excess energy by at least a power dissipation circuit that includes the boost switch. The controlled power dissipation phase occurs after a charging phase begins and before an end of a subsequent flyback phase of the switching power converter.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a method includes controlling a boost switch in a switching power converter of a phase cut compatible, dimmable lighting system in an efficient mode and in a power dissipation mode. Controlling the boost switch in the efficient mode includes operating the boost switch to minimize power dissipation in the boost switch. Controlling the boost switch in the power dissipation mode includes operating the boost switch to increase dissipation of energy in the boost switch relative to any power dissipation in the boost switch during operation in the efficient mode.
The present invention may be better understood, and its numerous objects, features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings. The use of the same reference number throughout the several figures designates a like or similar element.
A lighting system includes one or more methods and systems to control dissipation of excess power in the lighting system when the power into a switching power converter from a leading edge, phase-cut dimmer is greater than the power out of the switching power converter. In at least one embodiment, the lighting system includes a controller that controls dissipation of excess energy in the lighting system to prevent a premature disconnection of the phase-cut dimmer. In at least one embodiment, the controller actively controls power dissipation by generating one or more signals to actively and selectively control power dissipation in the lighting system. By actively and selectively controlling power dissipation in the lighting system, the controller intentionally dissipates power when the power into the lighting system should be greater than the power out to a lamp of the lighting system. However, when the ‘power in’ can equal the ‘power out’ plus any inherent power losses without causing the phase-cut dimmer to prematurely disconnect, the controller causes the lighting system to operate more efficiently by reducing or eliminating intentional power dissipation in the lighting system.
To control dissipation of the excess energy, the controller controls one or more power dissipation circuits during one or more controlled power dissipation phases. In at least one embodiment, the controller creates one or more intermixed and/or interspersed power dissipation phases with one or more switching power converter charging and/or flyback phases. “Intermixed” refers to mixing one or more power dissipation phases with one or more charging and/or flyback phases. “Interspersed” refers to inserting one or more power dissipation phases between one or more charging and/or flyback phases. The controlled power dissipation phase occurs after a charging phase begins and before an end of a subsequent flyback phase of the switching power converter. In at least one embodiment, for a boost switching power converter, the charging phase is a phase when an inductor current of the switching power converter is increasing and charging a boost inductor of the switching power converter. The flyback phase is when the inductor current decreases and boosts a link voltage of the switching power converter.
In at least one embodiment, the lighting system includes one, some, or all of a switch path, link path, and flyback path power dissipation circuits to actively and selectively control power dissipation of excess energy in a switching power converter of the lighting system. The switch path power dissipation circuit dissipates power through a switch path in the switching power converter of the lighting system. In at least one embodiment, a controller is configured to control a boost switch in a switching power converter of a phase cut compatible, dimmable lighting system. The controller is configured to control the boost switch in an efficient mode and a power dissipation mode. In the efficient mode, the controller is configured to operate the boost switch to minimize power dissipation in the boost switch, and in the power dissipation mode the controller is configured to operate the boost switch to increase dissipation of energy in the boost switch relative to any power dissipation in the boost switch during operation in the efficient mode. In at least one embodiment, the switch path includes a current source to limit an inductor current through the boost switch. Limiting the inductor current through the boost switch causes the current source and/or the boost switch to dissipate power.
In at least one embodiment, the lighting system controls one or more of the timing, sequencing, and/or magnitude of the current through the boost switch, or any combination thereof, to control power dissipation by the lighting system. In at least one embodiment, controlling the timing of the current refers to a duration of time in which the current is limited or restricted. In at least one embodiment, controlling the sequencing of the current through the boost switch refers to selecting which charging and flyback phase time frames andor cycles of an input voltage to a switching power converter to control power dissipation in the lighting system. In at least one embodiment, each charging and flyback time frame occurs between when a first charging phase following an immediately preceding flyback phase begins and a flyback phase immediately preceding a next charging phase ends. In at least one embodiment, the sequence of cycles is a consecutive series of cycles, and, in at least one embodiment, the sequence of time frames or cycles is a non-consecutive series of time frames or cycles. In at least one embodiment, controlling the magnitude of the current includes controlling the internal resistance of the boost switch and/or controlling one or more current limits on the current through the boost switch.
The flyback path power dissipation circuit dissipates power through a flyback path of the switching power converter. In at least one embodiment, the lighting system controls power dissipation through a flyback path by controlling a transformer primary current in the flyback path and, for example, limiting the primary current with a current source and dissipating power in the current source. In at least one embodiment, the flyback path power dissipation circuit includes a flyback switch to limit the flyback current in the flyback switch. In at least one embodiment, the flyback path includes a current source to limit the flyback current. Limiting the flyback current through the flyback switch causes the current source and/or the flyback switch to dissipate power. In at least one embodiment, the lighting system controls one or more of the timing, sequencing, and/or magnitude of the current through the flyback switch, or any combination thereof, to control power dissipation by the lighting system.
The link path power dissipation circuit dissipates power through a link path of the switching power converter by controlling a link current of the switching power converter. In at least one embodiment, the controller controls the link path power dissipation circuit to limit the link current with a current source and dissipating power in the current source. In at least one embodiment, the link path power dissipation circuit includes an output switch to limit the link current by controlling an internal resistance of the switch. In at least one embodiment, the link path includes a current source to limit the link current. Limiting the link current through the output switch causes the current source and/or the output switch to dissipate power. In at least one embodiment, the lighting system controls one or more of the timing, sequencing, and/or magnitude of the current through the output switch, or any combination thereof, to control power dissipation by the lighting system.
As previously described, the phase-cut dimmer 102 can phase cut an input voltage VIN supplied by voltage supply 104. The full-bridge diode rectifier 106 rectifies the phase cut input voltage Vφ
Controller 408 generates one or more respective control signals for each of the dissipation circuits 402, 404, and 406 that are included in the lighting system 400. Control signals CS, CO, and CF respectively control power dissipation in the switch path power dissipation circuit 402, link path power dissipation circuit 404, and flyback path power dissipation circuit 406. The switch path power dissipation circuit 402 dissipates power through a switch path 412 in the switching power converter 410 of the lighting system 400 in accordance with the control signal CS. The link path power dissipation circuit 404 dissipates power through a link path 414 in the switching power converter 410 in accordance with the control signal CO. The flyback path power dissipation circuit 406 dissipates power through a flyback path 416 in the switching power converter 410 in accordance with the control signal CF. The particular method and circuit(s) used to implement the power dissipation circuits 402, 404, and 406 and control dissipation of power through the switch path 412 is a matter of design choice. Additionally, controlling the timing, sequencing, and/or magnitude of power dissipation in the power dissipation circuits 402, 404, and 406 is a matter of design choice. Exemplary embodiments of the power dissipation circuits 402, 404, and 406 are subsequently described. The power dissipation circuits 402, 404, and 406 are depicted in
The particular implementation of controller 408 is a matter of design choice. For example, controller 408 can be (i) implemented as an integrated circuit including, for example, a processor to execute software or firmware instructions stored in a memory, (ii) implemented using discrete components, or (iii) implemented using any combination of the foregoing. In at least one embodiment, controller 408 generally regulates the link voltage as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/967,269, entitled “Power Control System Using a Nonlinear Delta-Sigma Modulator With Nonlinear Power Conversion Process Modeling”, filed on Dec. 31, 2007, inventor John L. Melanson (referred to herein as “Melanson I”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/967,275, entitled “Programmable Power Control System”, filed on Dec. 31, 2007, and inventor John L. Melanson (referred to herein as “Melanson II”), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/495,457, entitled “Cascode Configured Switching Using at Least One Low Breakdown Voltage Internal, Integrated Circuit Switch to Control At Least One High Breakdown Voltage External Switch”, filed on Jun. 30, 2009 (“referred to herein as “Melanson III”), and inventor John L. Melanson, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/174,404, entitled “Constant Current Controller With Selectable Gain”, filing date Jun. 30, 2011, and inventors John L. Melanson, Rahul Singh, and Siddharth Maru, which are all incorporated by reference in their entireties. The switching power converter 410 can be any type of switching power converter, such as a boost, buck, boost-buck, or Cúk switching power converter. Switching power converter 410 includes other components, such as an EMI capacitor, inductor, and link capacitor, which, for clarity of
The manner of determining whether the POWER IN is greater than the PINH+POWER OUT is a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, the controller 408 includes the power monitor circuit 422. When power demand by the lamp 418 increases, the link voltage VLINK decreases, which indicates an increase in the POWER OUT. Conversely, when power demand by the lamp 418 declines, the link voltage VLINK increases, which indicates a decrease in the POWER OUT. The comparator 424 of the power monitor circuit 422, thus, compares the link voltage VLINK with a reference link voltage VLINK
When the POWER IN is greater than the PINH+POWER OUT to the load 518, the controller 506 controls the switch path power dissipation circuit 502 to control dissipation of the excess energy by at least the boost switch 504. Load 518 includes one or more LEDs. In at least one embodiment, a gate voltage VG biases a gate of boost switch 504 so that controller 506 controls conductivity of the boost switch 504 using a source control signal CS1 as, for example, generally described in Melanson III. In other embodiments, controller 506 controls the gate voltage VG of boost switch 504 to control conductivity of the boost switch 504 as, for example, generally described in Melanson I and Melanson II. Controller 506 represents one embodiment of controller 408. In at least one embodiment, the control signal CS1 controls the value of the inductor current iL, as depicted by the exemplary, variable inductor current waveform 510.
The inductor current waveform 510 represents an exemplary inductor current iL waveform during controlled dissipation of energy through the boost switch 504. During a charging phase TC, the controller 506 generates the control signal CS1 to cause the boost switch 504 to conduct. When the boost switch 504 conducts, the inductor current iL increases. When POWER IN is greater than POWER OUT+PINH, rather than minimizing power loss, the controller 506 intentionally limits the inductor current iL, which causes dissipation of excess energy by at least the boost switch 504 during a power dissipation phase TPD. Assuming that inherent losses in the switching power converter 508 are negligible, the “excess energy” equals the POWER IN minus the (POWER OUT+PINH). Limiting the inductor current iL during the power dissipation phase TPD causes the change in the inductor current diL/dt to move toward 0. Since the voltage VL across the inductor 116 equals L·diL/dt, the voltage VL is directly proportional to the rate of change of the inductor current diL/dt. “L” is the inductance of inductor 116. Thus, as the rate of change of the inductor current diL/dt moves toward 0, the rate of energy storage by the inductor 116 decreases toward 0 and more power is dissipated by the boost switch power dissipation circuit 502.
Referring to the control signal CS1 waveform 513, in at least one embodiment, the controller 506 is configured to control the boost switch 504 in an efficient mode and a power dissipation mode. In the efficient mode, the controller 506 generates a two-state control signal CS1, such as the two-states of control signal CS0 (
For example, in at least one embodiment, the rate of change of the inductor current diL/dt is driven by the controller 506 to approximately 0. When the change diL/dt in the inductor current iL is 0, the inductor current iL holds at a constant value, and the voltage VL across inductor 116 is approximately 0. During a charging phase, the inductor current iL increases. To dissipate power during a charging phase TC, the rate of change of the inductor current diL/dt is decreased, which reduces the voltage VL across the inductor 116. As the inductor voltage VL decreases, the proportion of power dissipated by the switch path power dissipation circuit 502 increases. During a flyback phase, the rate of change of the inductor current diL/dt and the inductor voltage VL are negative. Thus, to dissipate power during a flyback phase, the rate of change of the inductor current diL/dt is increased towards 0, which increases the inductor voltage VL toward 0 and increases the proportion of power dissipated by the switch path power dissipation circuit 502.
In at least one embodiment, the current source 509 limits the inductor current to an inductor current limit value iLIM. Thus, when a value of the inductor current iL through the boost switch 504 reaches the inductor current limit value iLIM, diL/dt decreases with 0 or to a smaller value that a value that would otherwise occur without a power dissipation phase TPD. The power dissipation phase TPD occurs after the charging phase TC and before the subsequent flyback phase TFB In at least one embodiment, the controller 506 intersperses the power dissipation phase TPD between the charging phase TC and the flyback phase TFB and causes the switch path power dissipation circuit 502 to dissipate energy until the flyback period TFB begins when the boost switch 504 is turned OFF.
In at least one embodiment, the inductor current limit value iLIM is controllable by the controller 506 to adjust a duration of the power dissipation period TPD. In at least one embodiment, the source control signal CS1 controls when the charging phase TC and the flyback phase TFB begin for each cycle of the rectified input voltage VφR
The controller 506 controls interspersing and/or intermixing of one or more power dissipation phases with one or more charging and/or flyback phases. In at least one embodiment, the controller 506 intersperses a power dissipation phase TPD between charging phases or a flyback phase by reducing the change in the inductor current iL over time, i.e. diL/dt, by reducing diL/dt to zero. When diL/dt is reduced to zero, power dissipation occurs through the boost switch 504. In at least one embodiment, the controller intermixes a power dissipation phase TPD with a charging phase To or a flyback phase TFB by reducing diL/dt to a non-zero value. When diL/dt is reduced to a non-zero value, the charging phase TC or flyback phase TFB continues in combination with power dissipation by the switch path power dissipation circuit 502 through the boost switch 504.
When controller 506 causes the source control signal CS1 to become a logical 0, the boost switch 504 turns ON, and the inductor current iL begins to ramp up at the beginning of charging period TC
When the boost switch 504 turns OFF, the power dissipation phase TPD
The duration of the power dissipation phases TPD
Additionally, in at least one embodiment, current source 608 can vary the value of the reference current iREF in accordance with an optional current reference control signal CiREF generated by controller 506. Varying the value of the reference current iREF also varies the inductor limit current iLIM in accordance with the scaling factor Z. By varying the reference current iREF and, thus, the inductor limit current iLIM during a single cycle of the rectified input voltage VφR
Additionally, in at least one embodiment, current source 608 can vary the value of the scaling factor Z in accordance with an optional scaling factor control signal CSCALE generated by controller 506. Varying the scaling factor Z also varies the inductor limit current iLIM in accordance with the scaling factor Z. By varying the scaling factor Z and, thus, the inductor limit current iLIM during a single cycle of the rectified input voltage VφR
In at least one embodiment, the controller 506 modulates the control signal CS1 to control current through switch 504 using at least four (4) states. States 1 and 2 are efficient states when the controller 506 operates the boost switch 504 in an efficient mode and, thus, minimizes power dissipation by the boost switch 504. States 3 and 4 are inefficient states when the controller 506 operates the boost switch 504 in a power dissipation mode. During states 3 and 4 in the power dissipation mode, the controller 506 intentionally and actively causes the boost switch 504 to dissipate power.
Referring to the waveforms 800 and the switch path power dissipation circuit 600, during the charging phase TC
At the beginning of the third charging phase TC
During power dissipation phase TPD
The lighting system 1000 also includes a controller 506 that controls the flyback path power dissipation circuit 1002 and generates control signal CS2 to control switching power converter 1008. In at least one embodiment, switching power converter 1008 is a boost-type switching power converter, such as switching power converter 108 (
In at least one embodiment, the flyback path power dissipation circuit 1002 modulates the primary current iP to energize the primary-side coil 1010 of transformer 1012. Transformer 1012 transfers energy from the primary-side coil 1010 to the secondary-side coil 1014 to cause a secondary current iS to flow through diode 1016 and charge load voltage capacitor 1018 to the load voltage VLD. The load voltage VLD provides a voltage across lamp 1020.
When the POWER IN is greater than the POWER OUT+PINH, controller 506 operates the flyback path power dissipation circuit 1002 to dissipate excess energy. The particular implementation and operation of the flyback path power dissipation circuit 1002 to dissipate the excess energy is a matter of design choice.
Referring to waveforms 1304, when controller 506 actively controls power dissipation in the flyback path power dissipation circuit 1200, in at least one embodiment, the current source 1202 generates the primary-side limit current iLIM
The implementation of the logic 1808 and current source 1810 is a matter of design choice. In at least one embodiment, the current source 1810 is identical to the current source 602 (
Referring to
Thus, a lighting system includes one or more methods and systems to control dissipation of excess power in the lighting system when the power into a switching power converter from a leading edge, phase-cut dimmer is greater than the power out of the switching power converter. In at least one embodiment, to control dissipation of the excess energy, the controller controls one or more power dissipation circuits during one or more controlled power dissipation phases. In at least one embodiment, the controller creates one or more intermixed and/or interspersed power dissipation phases with one or more switching power converter charging and/or flyback phases.
Although embodiments have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) and 37 C.F.R. §1.78 of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/410,168, filed on Nov. 4, 2010, and is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4523128 | Stamm et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
5055746 | Hu et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5179324 | Audbert | Jan 1993 | A |
5319301 | Callahan et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5321350 | Haas | Jun 1994 | A |
5430635 | Liu | Jul 1995 | A |
5691605 | Xia et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5770928 | Chansky et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
6043635 | Downey | Mar 2000 | A |
6046550 | Ference et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6091205 | Newman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6211624 | Holzer | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6380692 | Newman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407514 | Glaser et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6510995 | Muthu et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6713974 | Patcharnik et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6819538 | Blaauw et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6858995 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6900599 | Ribarich | May 2005 | B2 |
7102902 | Brown et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7180250 | Gannon | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7184937 | Su et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7656103 | Shteynberg et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7719246 | Melanson | May 2010 | B2 |
7728530 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7733678 | Notohamiprodjo et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7759881 | Melanson | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7872427 | Scianna | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8102167 | Irissou et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8115419 | Given et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8169154 | Thompson et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8212491 | Kost | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8212492 | Lam et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8222832 | Zheng et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8482220 | Melanson | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8487546 | Melanson | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8508147 | Shen | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8536794 | Melanson et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8536799 | Grisamore et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8547034 | Melanson et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8569972 | Melanson | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8610364 | Melanson et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8610365 | King et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8664885 | Koolen et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8716957 | Melanson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8749173 | Melanson et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8847515 | King et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020140371 | Chou et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040105283 | Schie et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040212321 | Lys | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060022648 | Ben-Yaakov et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060208669 | Huynh et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070182338 | Shteynberg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182347 | Shteynberg | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080018261 | Kastner | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080037303 | Mishimagi | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080101098 | Disney | May 2008 | A1 |
20080143266 | Langer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080192509 | Dhuyvetter et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205103 | Sutardja et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080224629 | Melanson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224633 | Melanson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080224636 | Melanson | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090134817 | Jurngwirth et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135632 | Sohma | May 2009 | A1 |
20090195186 | Guest et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090284182 | Cencur | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100002480 | Huynh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013405 | Thompson | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100013409 | Quek et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100164406 | Kost et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100213859 | Shteynberg et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100231136 | Reisenbauer et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244726 | Melanson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110043133 | Van Laanen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110080110 | Nuhfer et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110084622 | Barrow et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110084623 | Barrow | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110115395 | Barrow et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121754 | Shteynberg | May 2011 | A1 |
20110148318 | Shackle et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110204797 | Lin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110204803 | Grotkowski et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110234115 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110266968 | Bordin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291583 | Shen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309759 | Shteynberg et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120049752 | King et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120068626 | Lekatsas et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120098454 | Grotkowski et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133291 | Kitagawa et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120286686 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130015768 | Roberts et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130154495 | He | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140009082 | King et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1421986 | Jun 2003 | CN |
1459216 | Nov 2004 | CN |
1748446 | Mar 2006 | CN |
1843061 | Oct 2006 | CN |
101193474 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101505568 | Aug 2009 | CN |
101707874 | May 2010 | CN |
101790269 | Jul 2010 | CN |
101835314 | Sep 2010 | CN |
101926222 | Dec 2010 | CN |
1164819 | Dec 2001 | EP |
2232949 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2257124 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2008053181 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2009170240 | Jul 2009 | JP |
9917591 | Apr 1999 | WO |
02096162 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2006079937 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2008029108 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008112822 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2010011971 | Jan 2010 | WO |
WO2010011971 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010027493 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010035155 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2011008635 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011050453 | May 2011 | WO |
2011056068 | May 2011 | WO |
2012016197 | Feb 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Azoteq, IQS17 Family, IQ Switch—ProxSense Series, Touch Sensor, Load Control and User Interface, IQS17 Datasheet V2.00.doc, Jan. 2007, pp. 1-51, Azoteq (Pty) Ltd., Paarl, Western Cape, Republic of South Africa. |
Chan, Samuel, et al, Design and Implementation of Dimmable Electronic Ballast Based on Integrated Inductor, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 291-300, Dept. of Electron. Eng., City Univ. of Hong Kong. |
Rand, Dustin, et al, Issues, Models and Solutions for Triac Modulated Phase Dimming of LED Lamps, Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 2007. PESC 2007. IEEE, Jun. 17-21, 2007, pp. 1398-1404, Boston, MA, USA. |
Gonthier, Laurent, et al, EN55015 Compliant 500W Dimmer with Low-Losses Symmetrical Switches, ST Microelectronics, Power Electronics and Applications, 2005 European Conference, pp. 1-9, Aug. 7, 2006, Dresden. |
Green, Peter, A Ballast That Can Be Dimmed from a Domestic (Phase Cut) Dimmer, International Rectifier, IRPLCFL3 rev.b, pp. 1-12, Aug. 15, 2003, El Segundo, California, USA. |
Hausman, Don, Real-Time Illumination Stability Systems for Trailing-Edge (Reverse Phase Control) Dimmers, Lutron RTISS, Lutron Electronics Co, Dec. 2004, pp. 1-4, Coopersburg, PA, USA. |
Lee, Stephen, et al, A Novel Electrode Power Profiler for Dimmable Ballasts Using DC Link Voltage and Switching Frequency Controls, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 19, No. 3, May 2004, pp. 847-833, City University of Hong Kong. |
Engdahl, Tomi, Light Dimmer Circuits, 1997-2000, www.epanorama.net. |
O'Rourke, Conan, et al, Dimming Electronic Ballasts, National Lighting Product Information Program, Specifier Reports, vol. 7, No. 3, Oct. 1999, pp. 1-24, Troy, NY, USA. |
Supertex Inc, 56W Off-line LED Driver, 120VAC with PFC, 160V, 350mA Load, Dimmer Switch Compatible, DN-H05, pp. 1-20, Jun. 17, 2008, Sunnyvale, California, USA. |
Why Different Dimming Ranges, http://www.lutron.com/TechnicalDocumentLibrary/LutronBallastpg3.pdf. |
Wu, Tsai-Fu, et al, Single-Stage Electronic Ballast with Dimming Feature and Unity Power Factor, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 13, No. 3, May 1998, pp. 586-597. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in the corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/059438 on May 16, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in the corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/059438 and mailed on Aug. 29, 2012. |
Supertex, Inc., HV9931 Unity Power Factor LED Lamp Driver, pp. 1-7, 2005, Sunnyvale, California, USA. |
Amanci, et al, “Synchronization System with Zero-Crossing Peak Detection Algorithm for Power System Applications”, The 2010 International Power Electronics Conference, pp. 2984-2991, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. |
Patterson, James, “Efficient Method for Interfacing Triac Dimmers and LEDs”, National Semiconductor Corp., pp. 29-32, Jun. 23, 2011, USA. |
Vainio, Olli, “Digital Filtering for Robust 50/60 Hz Zero-Crossing Detectors”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 426-430, Apr. 1996, University of Santa Barbara, California, USA. |
First Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2015, mailed in Application No. 2011800534821, The State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, pp. 1-6. |
Search Report dated Feb. 13, 2015, mailed in Application No. 2011800534821, the State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, pp. 1-2. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120286684 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61410168 | Nov 2010 | US |