Patent Grant
9474023
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a wireless sensor unit system providing bi-directional communication between a sensor (e.g., smoke sensor, fire sensor, temperature sensor, water, etc.) and a repeater or base unit in a building protection system.
2. Description of the Related Art
Maintaining and protecting a building or complex is difficult and costly. Some conditions, such as fires, gas leaks, etc. are a danger to the occupants and the structure. Other malfunctions, such as water leaks in roofs, plumbing, etc. are not necessarily dangerous for the occupants, but can nevertheless cause considerable damage. In many cases, an adverse ambient condition such as water leakage, fire, etc. is not detected in the early stages when the damage and/or danger is relatively small. Sensors can be used to detect such adverse ambient conditions, but sensors present their own set of problems. For example, adding sensors, such as, for example, smoke detectors, water sensors, and the like in an existing structure can be prohibitively expensive due to the cost of installing wiring between the remote sensors and a centralized monitoring device used to monitor the sensors. Adding wiring to provide power to the sensors further increases the cost. Moreover, with regard to fire sensors, most fire departments will not allow automatic notification of the fire department based on the data from a smoke detector alone. Most fire departments require that a specific temperature rate-of-rise be detected before an automatic fire alarm system can notify the fire department. Unfortunately, detecting fire by temperature rate-of-rise generally means that the fire is not detected until it is too late to prevent major damage.
The present invention solves these and other problems by providing a relatively low cost, robust, wireless sensor system that provides an extended period of operability without maintenance. The system includes one or more intelligent sensor units and a base unit that can communicate with the sensor units. When one or more of the sensor units detects an anomalous condition (e.g., smoke, fire, water, etc.) the sensor unit communicates with the base unit and provides data regarding the anomalous condition. The base unit can contact a supervisor or other responsible person by a plurality of techniques, such as, telephone, pager, cellular telephone, Internet (and/or local area network), etc. In one embodiment, one or more wireless repeaters are used between the sensor units and the base unit to extend the range of the system and to allow the base unit to communicate with a larger number of sensors.
In one embodiment, the sensor system includes a number of sensor units located throughout a building that sense conditions and report anomalous results back to a central reporting station. The sensor units measure conditions that might indicate a fire, water leak, etc. The sensor units report the measured data to the base unit whenever the sensor unit determines that the measured data is sufficiently anomalous to be reported. The base unit can notify a responsible person such as, for example a building manager, building owner, private security service, etc. In one embodiment, the sensor units do not send an alarm signal to the central location. Rather, the sensors send quantitative measured data (e.g., smoke density, temperature rate of rise, etc.) to the central reporting station.
In one embodiment, the sensor system includes a battery-operated sensor unit that detects a condition, such as, for example, smoke, temperature, humidity, moisture, water, water temperature, carbon monoxide, natural gas, propane gas, other flammable gases, radon, poison gasses, etc. The sensor unit is placed in a building, apartment, office, residence, etc. In order to conserve battery power, the sensor is normally placed in a low-power mode. In one embodiment, while in the low power mode, the sensor unit takes regular sensor readings and evaluates the readings to determine if an anomalous condition exists. If an anomalous condition is detected, then the sensor unit “wakes up” and begins communicating with the base unit or with a repeater. At programmed intervals, the sensor also “wakes up” and sends status information to the base unit (or repeater) and then listens for commands for a period of time.
In one embodiment, the sensor unit is bi-directional and configured to receive instructions from the central reporting station (or repeater). Thus, for example, the central reporting station can instruct the sensor to: perform additional measurements; go to a standby mode; wake up; report battery status; change wake-up interval; run self-diagnostics and report results; etc. In one embodiment, the sensor unit also includes a tamper switch. When tampering with the sensor is detected, the sensor reports such tampering to the base unit. In one embodiment, the sensor reports its general health and status to the central reporting station on a regular basis (e.g., results of self-diagnostics, battery health, etc.).
In one embodiment, the sensor unit provides two wake-up modes, a first wake-up mode for taking measurements (and reporting such measurements if deemed necessary), and a second wake-up mode for listening for commands from the central reporting station. The two wake-up modes, or combinations thereof, can occur at different intervals.
In one embodiment, the sensor units use spread-spectrum techniques to communicate with the base unit and/or the repeater units. In one embodiment, the sensor units use frequency-hopping spread-spectrum. In one embodiment, each sensor unit has an Identification code (ID) and the sensor units attaches its ID to outgoing communication packets. In one embodiment, when receiving wireless data, each sensor unit ignores data that is addressed to other sensor units.
The repeater unit is configured to relay communications traffic between a number of sensor units and the base unit. The repeater units typically operate in an environment with several other repeater units and thus each repeater unit contains a database (e.g., a lookup table) of sensor IDs. During normal operation, the repeater only communicates with designated wireless sensor units whose IDs appears in the repeater's database. In one embodiment, the repeater is battery-operated and conserves power by maintaining an internal schedule of when its designated sensors are expected to transmit and going to a low-power mode when none of its designated sensor units is scheduled to transmit. In one embodiment, the repeater uses spread-spectrum to communicate with the base unit and the sensor units. In one embodiment, the repeater uses frequency-hopping spread-spectrum to communicate with the base unit and the sensor units. In one embodiment, each repeater unit has an ID and the repeater unit attaches its ID to outgoing communication packets that originate in the repeater unit. In one embodiment, each repeater unit ignores data that is addressed to other repeater units or to sensor units not serviced by the repeater.
In one embodiment, the repeater is configured to provide bi-directional communication between one or more sensors and a base unit. In one embodiment, the repeater is configured to receive instructions from the central reporting station (or repeater). Thus, for example, the central reporting station can instruct the repeater to: send commands to one or more sensors; go to standby mode; “wake up”; report battery status; change wake-up interval; run self-diagnostics and report results; etc.
The base unit is configured to receive measured sensor data from a number of sensor units. In one embodiment, the sensor information is relayed through the repeater units. The base unit also sends commands to the repeater units and/or sensor units. In one embodiment, the base unit includes a diskless PC that runs off of a CD-ROM, flash memory, DVD, or other read-only device, etc. When the base unit receives data from a wireless sensor indicating that there may be an emergency condition (e.g., a fire or excess smoke, temperature, water, flammable gas, etc.) the base unit will attempt to notify a responsible party (e.g., a building manager) by several communication channels (e.g., telephone, Internet, pager, cell phone, etc.). In one embodiment, the base unit sends instructions to place the wireless sensor in an alert mode (inhibiting the wireless sensor's low-power mode). In one embodiment, the base unit sends instructions to activate one or more additional sensors near the first sensor.
In one embodiment, the base unit maintains a database of the health, battery status, signal strength, and current operating status of all of the sensor units and repeater units in the wireless sensor system. In one embodiment, the base unit automatically performs routine maintenance by sending commands to each sensor to run a self-diagnostic and report the results. The bases unit collects such diagnostic results. In one embodiment, the base unit sends instructions to each sensor telling the sensor how long to wait between “wakeup” intervals. In one embodiment, the base unit schedules different wakeup intervals to different sensors based on the sensor's health, battery health, location, etc. In one embodiment, the base unit sends instructions to repeaters to route sensor information around a failed repeater.
The sensor units 102-106 include sensors to measure conditions, such as, for example, smoke, temperature, moisture, water, water temperature, humidity, carbon monoxide, natural gas, propane gas, security alarms, intrusion alarms (e.g., open doors, broken windows, open windows, and the like), other flammable gases, radon, poison gasses, etc. Different sensor units can be configured with different sensors or with combinations of sensors. Thus, for example, in one installation the sensor units 102 and 104 could be configured with smoke and/or temperature sensors while the sensor unit 103 could be configured with a humidity sensor.
The discussion that follows generally refers to the sensor unit 102 as an example of a sensor unit, with the understanding that the description of the sensor unit 102 can be applied to many sensor units. Similarly, the discussion generally refers to the repeater 110 by way of example, and not limitation. It will also be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that repeaters are useful for extending the range of the sensor units 102-106 but are not required in all embodiments. Thus, for example in one embodiment, one or more of the sensor units 102-106 can communicate directly with the base unit 112 without going through a repeater. It will also be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that
When the sensor unit 102 detects an anomalous condition (e.g., smoke, fire, water, etc.) the sensor unit communicates with the appropriate repeater unit 110 and provides data regarding the anomalous condition. The repeater unit 110 forwards the data to the base unit 112, and the base unit 112 forwards the information to the computer 113. The computer 113 evaluates the data and takes appropriate action. If the computer 113 determines that the condition is an emergency (e.g., fire, smoke, large quantities of water), then the computer 113 contacts the appropriate personnel 120. If the computer 113 determines that the situation warrants reporting, but is not an emergency, then the computer 113 logs the data for later reporting. In this way, the sensor system 100 can monitor the conditions in and around the building 101.
In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 has an internal power source (e.g., battery, solar cell, fuel cell, etc.). In order to conserve power, the sensor unit 102 is normally placed in a low-power mode. In one embodiment, using sensors that require relatively little power, while in the low power mode the sensor unit 102 takes regular sensor readings and evaluates the readings to determine if an anomalous condition exists. In one embodiment, using sensors that require relatively more power, while in the low power mode the sensor unit 102 takes and evaluates sensor readings at periodic intervals. If an anomalous condition is detected, then the sensor unit 102 “wakes up” and begins communicating with the base unit 112 through the repeater 110. At programmed intervals, the sensor unit 102 also “wakes up” and sends status information (e.g., power levels, self diagnostic information, etc.) to the base unit (or repeater) and then listens for commands for a period of time. In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 also includes a tamper detector. When tampering with the sensor unit 102 is detected, the sensor unit 102 reports such tampering to the base unit 112.
In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 provides bi-directional communication and is configured to receive data and/or instructions from the base unit 112. Thus, for example, the base unit 112 can instruct the sensor unit 102 to perform additional measurements, to go to a standby mode, to wake up, to report battery status, to change wake-up interval, to run self-diagnostics and report results, etc. In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 reports its general health and status on a regular basis (e.g., results of self-diagnostics, battery health, etc.).
In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 provides two wake-up modes, a first wake-up mode for taking measurements (and reporting such measurements if deemed necessary), and a second wake-up mode for listening for commands from the central reporting station. The two wake-up modes, or combinations thereof, can occur at different intervals.
In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 use spread-spectrum techniques to communicate with the repeater unit 110. In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 use frequency-hopping spread-spectrum. In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 has an address or identification (ID) code that distinguishes the sensor unit 102 from the other sensor units. The sensor unit 102 attaches its ID to outgoing communication packets so that transmissions from the sensor unit 102 can be identified by the repeater 110. The repeater 110 attaches the ID of the sensor unit 102 to data and/or instructions that are transmitted to the sensor unit 102. In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 ignores data and/or instructions that are addressed to other sensor units.
In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 includes a reset function. In one embodiment, the reset function is activated by the reset switch 208. In one embodiment, the reset function is active for a prescribed interval of time. During the reset interval, the transceiver 203 is in a receiving mode and can receive the identification code from an external programmer. In one embodiment, the external programmer wirelessly transmits a desired identification code. In one embodiment, the identification code is programmed by an external programmer that is connected to the sensor unit 102 through an electrical connector. In one embodiment, the electrical connection to the sensor unit 102 is provided by sending modulated control signals (power line carrier signals) through a connector used to connect the power source 206. In one embodiment, the external programmer provides power and control signals. In one embodiment, the external programmer also programs the type of sensor(s) installed in the sensor unit. In one embodiment, the identification code includes an area code (e.g., apartment number, zone number, floor number, etc.) and a unit number (e.g., unit 1, 2, 3, etc.).
In one embodiment, the sensor communicates with the repeater on the 900 MHz band. This band provides good transmission through walls and other obstacles normally found in and around a building structure. In one embodiment, the sensor communicates with the repeater on bands above and/or below the 900 MHz band. In one embodiment, the sensor, repeater, and/or base unit listen to a radio frequency channel before transmitting on that channel or before beginning transmission. If the channel is in use, (e.g., by another devise such as another repeater, a cordless telephone, etc.) then the sensor, repeater, and/or base unit changes to a different channel. In one embodiment, the sensor, repeater, and/or base unit coordinate frequency hopping by listening to radio frequency channels for interference and using an algorithm to select a next channel for transmission that avoids the interference. Thus, for example, in one embodiment, if a sensor senses a dangerous condition and goes into a continuous transmission mode, the sensor will test (e.g., listen to) the channel before transmission to avoid channels that are blocked, in use, or jammed. In one embodiment, the sensor continues to transmit data until it receives an acknowledgement from the base unit that the message has been received. In one embodiment, the sensor transmits data having a normal priority (e.g., status information) and does not look for an acknowledgement, and the sensor transmits data having elevated priority (e.g., excess smoke, temperature, etc.) until an acknowledgement is received.
The repeater unit 110 is configured to relay communications traffic between the sensor 102 (and, similarly, the sensor units 103-104) and the base unit 112. The repeater unit 110 typically operates in an environment with several other repeater units (such as the repeater unit 111 in
In one embodiment, the base unit 112 communicates with the sensor unit 102 by transmitting a communication packet addressed to the sensor unit 102. The repeaters 110 and 111 both receive the communication packet addressed to the sensor unit 102. The repeater unit 111 ignores the communication packet addressed to the sensor unit 102. The repeater unit 110 transmits the communication packet addressed to the sensor unit 102 to the sensor unit 102. In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102, the repeater unit 110, and the base unit 112 communicate using Frequency-Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS), also known as channel-hopping.
Frequency-hopping wireless systems offer the advantage of avoiding other interfering signals and avoiding collisions. Moreover, there are regulatory advantages given to systems that do not transmit continuously at one frequency. Channel-hopping transmitters change frequencies after a period of continuous transmission, or when interference is encountered. These systems may have higher transmit power and relaxed limitations on in-band spurs. FCC regulations limit transmission time on one channel to 400 milliseconds (averaged over 10-20 seconds depending on channel bandwidth) before the transmitter must change frequency. There is a minimum frequency step when changing channels to resume transmission. If there are 25 to 49 frequency channels, regulations allow effective radiated power of 24 dBm, spurs must be −20 dBc, and harmonics must be −41.2 dBc. With 50 or more channels, regulations allow effective radiated power to be up to 30 dBm.
In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102, the repeater unit 110, and the base unit 112 communicate using FHSS wherein the frequency hopping of the sensor unit 102, the repeater unit 110, and the base unit 112 are not synchronized such that at any given moment, the sensor unit 102 and the repeater unit 110 are on different channels. In such a system, the base unit 112 communicates with the sensor unit 102 using the hop frequencies synchronized to the repeater unit 110 rather than the sensor unit 102. The repeater unit 110 then forwards the data to the sensor unit using hop frequencies synchronized to the sensor unit 102. Such a system largely avoids collisions between the transmissions by the base unit 112 and the repeater unit 110.
In one embodiment, the sensor units 102-106 all use FHSS and the sensor units 102-106 are not synchronized. Thus, at any given moment, it is unlikely that any two or more of the sensor units 102-106 will transmit on the same frequency. In this manner, collisions are largely avoided. In one embodiment, collisions are not detected but are tolerated by the system 100. If a collisions does occur, data lost due to the collision is effectively re-transmitted the next time the sensor units transmit sensor data. When the sensor units 102-106 and repeater units 110-111 operate in asynchronous mode, then a second collision is highly unlikely because the units causing the collisions have hopped to different channels. In one embodiment, the sensor units 102-106, repeater units 110-110, and the base unit 112 use the same hop rate. In one embodiment, the sensor units 102-106, repeater units 110-110, and the base unit 112 use the same pseudo-random algorithm to control channel hopping, but with different starting seeds. In one embodiment, the starting seed for the hop algorithm is calculated from the ID of the sensor units 102-106, repeater units 110-110, or the base unit 112.
In an alternative embodiment, the base unit communicates with the sensor unit 102 by sending a communication packet addressed to the repeater unit 110, where the packet sent to the repeater unit 110 includes the address of the sensor unit 102. The repeater unit 102 extracts the address of the sensor unit 102 from the packet and creates and transmits a packet addressed to the sensor unit 102.
In one embodiment, the repeater unit 110 is configured to provide bi-directional communication between its sensors and the base unit 112. In one embodiment, the repeater 110 is configured to receive instructions from the base unit 110. Thus, for example, the base unit 112 can instruct the repeater to: send commands to one or more sensors; go to standby mode; “wake up”; report battery status; change wake-up interval; run self-diagnostics and report results; etc.
The base unit 112 is configured to receive measured sensor data from a number of sensor units either directly, or through the repeaters 110-111. The base unit 112 also sends commands to the repeater units 110-111 and/or to the sensor units 110-111. In one embodiment, the base unit 112 communicates with a diskless computer 113 that runs off of a CD-ROM. When the base unit 112 receives data from a sensor unit 102-111 indicating that there may be an emergency condition (e.g., a fire or excess smoke, temperature, water, etc.) the computer 113 will attempt to notify the responsible party 120.
In one embodiment, the computer 112 maintains a database of the health, power status (e.g., battery charge), and current operating status of all of the sensor units 102-106 and the repeater units 110-111. In one embodiment, the computer 113 automatically performs routine maintenance by sending commands to each sensor unit 102-106 to run a self-diagnostic and report the results. The computer 113 collects and logs such diagnostic results. In one embodiment, the computer 113 sends instructions to each sensor unit 102-106 telling the sensor how long to wait between “wakeup” intervals. In one embodiment, the computer 113 schedules different wakeup intervals to different sensor unit 102-106 based on the sensor unit's health, power status, location, etc. In one embodiment, the computer 113 schedules different wakeup intervals to different sensor unit 102-106 based on the type of data and urgency of the data collected by the sensor unit (e.g., sensor units that have smoke and/or temperature sensors produce data that should be checked relatively more often than sensor units that have humidity or moisture sensors). In one embodiment, the base unit sends instructions to repeaters to route sensor information around a failed repeater.
In one embodiment, the computer 113 produces a display that tells maintenance personnel which sensor units 102-106 need repair or maintenance. In one embodiment, the computer 113 maintains a list showing the status and/or location of each sensor according to the ID of each sensor.
In one embodiment, the sensor units 102-106 and/or the repeater units 110-111 measure the signal strength of the wireless signals received (e.g., the sensor unit 102 measures the signal strength of the signals received from the repeater unit 110, the repeater unit 110 measures the signal strength received from the sensor unit 102 and/or the base unit 112). The sensor units 102-106 and/or the repeater units 110-111 report such signal strength measurement back to the computer 113. The computer 113 evaluates the signal strength measurements to ascertain the health and robustness of the sensor system 100. In one embodiment, the computer 113 uses the signal strength information to re-route wireless communications traffic in the sensor system 100. Thus, for example, if the repeater unit 110 goes offline or is having difficulty communicating with the sensor unit 102, the computer 113 can send instructions to the repeater unit 111 to add the ID of the sensor unit 102 to the database of the repeater unit 111 (and similarly, send instructions to the repeater unit 110 to remove the ID of the sensor unit 102), thereby routing the traffic for the sensor unit 102 through the router unit 111 instead of the router unit 110.
In one embodiment, the transceiver 203 is based on a TRF 6901 transceiver chip from Texas Instruments, Inc. In one embodiment, the controller 202 is a conventional programmable microcontroller. In one embodiment, the controller 202 is based on a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), such as, for example, provided by Xilinx Corp. In one embodiment, the sensor 201 includes an optoelectric smoke sensor with a smoke chamber. In one embodiment, the sensor 201 includes a thermistor. In one embodiment, the sensor 201 includes a humidity sensor. In one embodiment, the sensor 201 includes an sensor, such as, for example, a water level sensor, a water temperature sensor, a carbon monoxide sensor, a moisture sensor, a water flow sensor, natural gas sensor, propane sensor, etc.
The controller 202 receives sensor data from the sensor(s) 201. Some sensors 201 produce digital data. However, for many types of sensors 201, the sensor data is analog data. Analog sensor data is converted to digital format by the controller 202. In one embodiment, the controller evaluates the data received from the sensor(s) 201 and determines whether the data is to be transmitted to the base unit 112. The sensor unit 102 generally conserves power by not transmitting data that falls within a normal range. In one embodiment, the controller 202 evaluates the sensor data by comparing the data value to a threshold value (e.g., a high threshold, a low threshold, or a high-low threshold). If the data is outside the threshold (e.g., above a high threshold, below a low threshold, outside an inner range threshold, or inside an outer range threshold), then the data is deemed to be anomalous and is transmitted to the base unit 112. In one embodiment, the data threshold is programmed into the controller 202. In one embodiment, the data threshold is programmed by the base unit 112 by sending instructions to the controller 202. In one embodiment, the controller 202 obtains sensor data and transmits the data when commanded by the computer 113.
In one embodiment, the tamper sensor 205 is configured as a switch that detects removal of or tampering with the sensor unit 102.
When relaying sensor data to the base unit 112, the controller 303 receives data from the first transceiver 303 and provides the data to the second transceiver 304. When relaying instructions from the base unit 112 to a sensor unit, the controller 303 receives data from the second transceiver 304 and provides the data to the first transceiver 302. In one embodiment, the controller 303 conserves power by powering-down the transceivers 302, 304 during periods when the controller 303 is not expecting data. The controller 303 also monitors the power source 306 and provides status information, such as, for example, self-diagnostic information and/or information about the health of the power source 306, to the base unit 112. In one embodiment, the controller 303 sends status information to the base unit 112 at regular intervals. In one embodiment, the controller 303 sends status information to the base unit 112 when requested by the base unit 112. In one embodiment, the controller 303 sends status information to the base unit 112 when a fault condition (e.g., battery low) is detected.
In one embodiment, the controller 303 includes a table or list of identification codes for wireless sensor units 102. The repeater 303 forwards packets received from, or sent to, sensor units 102 in the list. In one embodiment, the repeater 110 receives entries for the list of sensor units from the computer 113. In one embodiment, the controller 303 determines when a transmission is expected from the sensor units 102 in the table of sensor units and places the repeater 110 (e.g., the transceivers 302, 304) in a low-power mode when no transmissions are expected from the transceivers on the list. In one embodiment, the controller 303 recalculates the times for low-power operation when a command to change reporting interval is forwarded to one of the sensor units 102 in the list (table) of sensor units or when a new sensor unit is added to the list (table) of sensor units.
In one embodiment, the data packets that travel between the sensor unit 102, the repeater unit 111, and the base unit 112 are encrypted. In one embodiment, the data packets that travel between the sensor unit 102, the repeater unit 111, and the base unit 112 are encrypted and an authentication code is provided in the data packet so that the sensor unit 102, the repeater unit, and/or the base unit 112 can verify the authenticity of the packet.
In one embodiment the address portion 502 includes a first code and a second code. In one embodiment, the repeater 111 only examines the first code to determine if the packet should be forwarded. Thus, for example, the first code can be interpreted as a building (or building complex) code and the second code interpreted as a subcode (e.g., an apartment code, area code, etc.). A repeater that uses the first code for forwarding thus forwards packets having a specified first code (e.g., corresponding to the repeater's building or building complex). Thus alleviates the need to program a list of sensor units 102 into a repeater, since a group of sensors in a building will typically all have the same first code but different second codes. A repeater so configured, only needs to know the first code to forward packets for any repeater in the building or building complex. This does, however, raise the possibility that two repeaters in the same building could try to forward packets for the same sensor unit 102. In one embodiment, each repeater waits for a programmed delay period before forwarding a packet. Thus reducing the chance of packet collisions at the base unit (in the case of sensor unit to base unit packets) and reducing the chance of packet collisions at the sensor unit (in the case of base unit to sensor unit packets). In one embodiment, a delay period is programmed into each repeater. In one embodiment, delay periods are pre-programmed onto the repeater units at the factory or during installation. In one embodiment, a delay period is programmed into each repeater by the base unit 112. In one embodiment, a repeater randomly chooses a delay period. In one embodiment, a repeater randomly chooses a delay period for each forwarded packet. In one embodiment, the first code is at least 6 digits. In one embodiment, the second code is at least 5 digits.
In one embodiment, the first code and the second code are programmed into each sensor unit at the factory. In one embodiment, the first code and the second code are programmed when the sensor unit is installed. In one embodiment, the base unit 112 can re-program the first code and/or the second code in a sensor unit.
In one embodiment, collisions are further avoided by configuring each repeater unit 111 to begin transmission on a different frequency channel. Thus, if two repeaters attempt to begin transmission at the same time, the repeaters will not interfere with each other because the transmissions will begin on different channels (frequencies).
Relatively continuous monitoring, such as shown in
In one embodiment, the sensor unit transmits sensor data until a handshaking-type acknowledgement is received. Thus, rather than sleep if no instructions or acknowledgements are received after transmission (e.g., after the decision block 613 or 709) the sensor unit 102 retransmits its data and waits for an acknowledgement. The sensor unit 102 continues to transmit data and wait for an acknowledgement until an acknowledgement is received. In one embodiment, the sensor unit accepts an acknowledgement from a repeater unit 111 and it then becomes the responsibility of the repeater unit 111 to make sure that the data is forwarded to the base unit 112. In one embodiment, the repeater unit 111 does not generate the acknowledgement, but rather forwards an acknowledgement from the base unit 112 to the sensor unit 102. The two-way communication ability of the sensor unit 102 provides the capability for the base unit 112 to control the operation of the sensor unit 102 and also provides the capability for robust handshaking-type communication between the sensor unit 102 and the base unit 112.
Regardless of the normal operating mode of the sensor unit 102 (e.g., using the Flowcharts of
In one embodiment, a remote shutoff valve 810 is provided, so that the monitoring system 100 can shutoff the water supply to the water heater when a leak is detected. In one embodiment, the shutoff valve is controlled by the sensor unit 102. In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 receives instructions from the base unit 112 to shut off the water supply to the heater 801. In one embodiment, the responsible party 120 sends instructions to the monitoring computer 113 instructing the monitoring computer 113 to send water shut off instructions to the sensor unit 102. Similarly, in one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 controls a gas shutoff valve 811 to shut off the gas supply to the water heater 801 and/or to a furnace (not shown) when dangerous conditions (such as, for example, gas leaks, carbon monoxide, etc.) are detected. In one embodiment, a gas detector 812 is provided to the sensor unit 102. In one embodiment, the gas detector 812 measures carbon monoxide. In one embodiment, the gas detector 812 measures flammable gas, such as, for example, natural gas or propane.
In one embodiment, an optional temperature sensor 818 is provided to measure stack temperature. Using data from the temperature sensor 818, the sensor unit 102 reports conditions, such as, for example, excess stack temperature. Excess stack temperature is often indicative of poor heat transfer (and thus poor efficiency) in the water heater 818.
In one embodiment, an optional temperature sensor 819 is provided to measure temperature of water in the water heater 810. Using data from the temperature sensor 819, the sensor unit 102 reports conditions, such as, for example, over-temperature or under-temperature of the water in the water heater.
In one embodiment, an optional current probe 821 is provided to measure electric current provided to a heating element 820 in an electric water heater. Using data from the current probe 821, the sensor unit 102 reports conditions, such as, for example, no current (indicating a burned-out heating element 820). An over-current condition often indicates that the heating element 820 is encrusted with mineral deposits and needs to be replaced or cleaned. By measuring the current provided to the water heater, the monitoring system can measure the amount of energy provided to the water heater and thus the cost of hot water, and the efficiency of the water heater.
In one embodiment, the sensor 803 includes a moisture sensor. Using data from the moisture sensor, the sensor unit 102 reports moisture conditions, such as, for example, excess moisture that would indicate a water leak, excess condensation, etc.
In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 is provided to a moisture sensor (such as the sensor 803) located near an air conditioning unit. Using data from the moisture sensor, the sensor unit 102 reports moisture conditions, such as, for example, excess moisture that would indicate a water leak, excess condensation, etc.
In one embodiment, the sensor 201 includes a moisture sensor. The moisture sensor can be place under a sink or a toilet (to detect plumbing leaks) or in an attic space (to detect roof leaks).
Excess humidity in a structure can cause sever problems such as rotting, growth of molds, mildew, and fungus, etc. (hereinafter referred to generically as fungus). In one embodiment, the sensor 201 includes a humidity sensor. The humidity sensor can be place under a sink, in an attic space, etc. to detect excess humidity (due to leaks, condensation, etc.). In one embodiment, the monitoring computer 113 compares humidity measurements taken from different sensor units in order to detect areas that have excess humidity. Thus for example, the monitoring computer 113 can compare the humidity readings from a first sensor unit 102 in a first attic area, to a humidity reading from a second sensor unit 102 in a second area. For example, the monitoring computer can take humidity readings from a number of attic areas to establish a baseline humidity reading and then compare the specific humidity readings from various sensor units to determine if one or more of the units are measuring excess humidity. The monitoring computer 113 would flag areas of excess humidity for further investigation by maintenance personnel. In one embodiment, the monitoring computer 113 maintains a history of humidity readings for various sensor units and flags areas that show an unexpected increase in humidity for investigation by maintenance personnel.
In one embodiment, the monitoring system 100 detects conditions favorable for fungus (e.g., mold, mildew, fungus, etc.) growth by using a first humidity sensor located in a first building area to produce first humidity data and a second humidity sensor located in a second building area to produce second humidity data. The building areas can be, for example, areas near a sink drain, plumbing fixture, plumbing, attic areas, outer walls, a bilge area in a boat, etc.
The monitoring station 113 collects humidity readings from the first humidity sensor and the second humidity sensor and indicates conditions favorable for fungus growth by comparing the first humidity data and the second humidity data. In one embodiment, the monitoring station 113 establishes a baseline humidity by comparing humidity readings from a plurality of humidity sensors and indicates possible fungus growth conditions in the first building area when at least a portion of the first humidity data exceeds the baseline humidity by a specified amount. In one embodiment, the monitoring station 113 establishes a baseline humidity by comparing humidity readings from a plurality of humidity sensors and indicates possible fungus growth conditions in the first building area when at least a portion of the first humidity data exceeds the baseline humidity by a specified percentage.
In one embodiment, the monitoring station 113 establishes a baseline humidity history by comparing humidity readings from a plurality of humidity sensors and indicates possible fungus growth conditions in the first building area when at least a portion of the first humidity data exceeds the baseline humidity history by a specified amount over a specified period of time. In one embodiment, the monitoring station 113 establishes a baseline humidity history by comparing humidity readings from a plurality of humidity sensors over a period of time and indicates possible fungus growth conditions in the first building area when at least a portion of the first humidity data exceeds the baseline humidity by a specified percentage of a specified period of time.
In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 transmits humidity data when it determines that the humidity data fails a threshold test. In one embodiment, the humidity threshold for the threshold test is provided to the sensor unit 102 by the monitoring station 113. In one embodiment, the humidity threshold for the threshold test is computed by the monitoring station from a baseline humidity established in the monitoring station. In one embodiment, the baseline humidity is computed at least in part as an average of humidity readings from a number of humidity sensors. In one embodiment, the baseline humidity is computed at least in part as a time average of humidity readings from a number of humidity sensors. In one embodiment, the baseline humidity is computed at least in part as a time average of humidity readings from a humidity sensor. In one embodiment, the baseline humidity is computed at least in part as the lesser of a maximum humidity reading an average of a number of humidity readings.
In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 reports humidity readings in response to a query by the monitoring station 113. In one embodiment, the sensor unit 102 reports humidity readings at regular intervals. In one embodiment, a humidity interval is provided to the sensor unit 102 by the monitoring station 113.
In one embodiment, the calculation of conditions for fungus growth is comparing humidity readings from one or more humidity sensors to the baseline (or reference) humidity. In one embodiment, the comparison is based on comparing the humidity readings to a percentage (e.g., typically a percentage greater than 100%) of the baseline value. In one embodiment, the comparison is based on comparing the humidity readings to a specified delta value above the reference humidity. In one embodiment, the calculation of likelihood of conditions for fungus growth is based on a time history of humidity readings, such that the longer the favorable conditions exist, the greater the likelihood of fungus growth. In one embodiment, relatively high humidity readings over a period of time indicate a higher likelihood of fungus growth than relatively high humidity readings for short periods of time. In one embodiment, a relatively sudden increase in humidity as compared to a baseline or reference humidity is reported by the monitoring station 113 as a possibility of a water leak. If the relatively high humidity reading continues over time then the relatively high humidity is reported by the monitoring station 113 as possibly being a water leak and/or an area likely to have fungus growth or water damage.
Temperatures relatively more favorable to fungus growth increase the likelihood of fungus growth. In one embodiment, temperature measurements from the building areas are also used in the fungus grown-likelihood calculations. In one embodiment, a threshold value for likelihood of fungus growth is computed at least in part as a function of temperature, such that temperatures relatively more favorable to fungus growth result in a relatively lower threshold than temperatures relatively less favorable for fungus growth. In one embodiment, the calculation of a likelihood of fungus growth depends at least in part on temperature such that temperatures relatively more favorable to fungus growth indicate a relatively higher likelihood of fungus growth than temperatures relatively less favorable for fungus growth. Thus, in one embodiment, a maximum humidity and/or minimum threshold above a reference humidity is relatively lower for temperature more favorable to fungus growth than the maximum humidity and/or minimum threshold above a reference humidity for temperatures relatively less favorable to fungus growth.
In one embodiment, a water flow sensor is provided to the sensor unit 102. The sensor unit 102 obtains water flow data from the water flow sensor and provides the water flow data to the monitoring computer 113. The monitoring computer 113 can then calculate water usage. Additionally, the monitoring computer can watch for water leaks, by, for example, looking for water flow when there should be little or no flow. Thus, for example, if the monitoring computer detects water usage throughout the night, the monitoring computer can raise an alert indicating that a possible water leak has occurred.
In one embodiment, the sensor 201 includes a water flow sensor is provided to the sensor unit 102. The sensor unit 102 obtains water flow data from the water flow sensor and provides the water flow data to the monitoring computer 113. The monitoring computer 113 can then calculate water usage. Additionally, the monitoring computer can watch for water leaks, by, for example, looking for water flow when there should be little or no flow. Thus, for example, if the monitoring computer detects water usage throughout the night, the monitoring computer can raise an alert indicating that a possible water leak has occurred.
In one embodiment, the sensor 201 includes a fire-extinguisher tamper sensor is provided to the sensor unit 102. The fire-extinguisher tamper sensor reports tampering with or use of a fire-extinguisher. In one embodiment the fire-extinguisher tamper sensor reports that the fire extinguisher has been removed from its mounting, that a fire extinguisher compartment has been opened, and/or that a safety lock on the fire extinguisher has been removed.
It will be evident to those skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the details of the foregoing illustrated embodiments and that the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributed thereof; furthermore, various omissions, substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the spirit of the inventions. For example, although specific embodiments are described in terms of the 900 MHz frequency band, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that frequency bands above and below 900 MHz can be used as well. The wireless system can be configured to operate on one or more frequency bands, such as, for example, the HF band, the VHF band, the UHF band, the Microwave band, the Millimeter wave band, etc. One of ordinary skill in the art will further recognize that techniques other than spread spectrum can also be used and/or can be use instead spread spectrum. The modulation uses is not limited to any particular modulation method, such that modulation scheme used can be, for example, frequency modulation, phase modulation, amplitude modulation, combinations thereof, etc. The foregoing description of the embodiments is therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, with the scope of the invention being delineated by the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/875,488, filed Oct. 5, 2015, and entitled “CONTROLLED POWER-EFFICIENT OPERATION OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/298,371, filed Jun. 6, 2014, and entitled “CONTROLLED POWER-EFFICIENT OPERATION OF WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICES,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,183,733 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/168,876, filed Jan. 30, 2014, and entitled “WIRELESS TRANSCEIVER,” now U.S. Pat. No. 9,357,490 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/905,248, filed Oct. 15, 2010, and entitled, “WIRELESS TRANSCEIVER,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/182,079, filed Jul. 29, 2008, and entitled “WIRELESS TRANSCEIVER,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,817,031, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/562,313, filed Nov. 21, 2006, and entitled “WIRELESS TRANSCEIVER,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,411,494, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/856,231, filed May 27, 2004, and entitled “WIRELESS TRANSCEIVER,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,142,107. The entire disclosures of the above applications are hereby incorporated by reference, for all purposes, as if fully set forth herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2101637 | Davis | Dec 1937 | A |
| 2233297 | Polin et al. | Feb 1941 | A |
| 4056780 | Faulkner | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4061442 | Clark et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4099168 | Kedjierski et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
| 4136823 | Kullberg | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4226533 | Snowman | Oct 1980 | A |
| 4266220 | Malinowski | May 1981 | A |
| 4400694 | Wong et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4420746 | Malinowski | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4437336 | Abe | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4455553 | Johnson | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4514720 | Oberstein et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4535450 | Tan | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4543570 | Bressett et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4556873 | Yamada et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4652859 | Van Wienen | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4661804 | Abel | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4670739 | Kelly | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4675661 | Ishii | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4692742 | Raizen et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4692750 | Murakami et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4727359 | Yuchi et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4772876 | Laud | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4801856 | Wajima | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4801865 | Miller et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4811011 | Sollinger | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4817131 | Thornborough et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4827244 | Bellavia et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4857895 | Kaprelian | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4862514 | Kedjierski | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4871999 | Ishii et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4901316 | Igarashi et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4916432 | Tice et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4939504 | Miller | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4951029 | Severson | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4977527 | Shaw et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4996518 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5107446 | Shaw et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5134644 | Garton et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5138562 | Shaw et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5151683 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5159315 | Schultz et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5168262 | Okayama | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5188143 | Krebs | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5201061 | Goldberg et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5224648 | Simon et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5229750 | Welch et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5240022 | Franklin | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5260687 | Yamauchi et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5267180 | Okayama | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5281951 | Okayama | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5315291 | Furr | May 1994 | A |
| 5319698 | Glidewell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5335186 | Tarrant | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5345224 | Brown | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5357241 | Welch | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5400246 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5408223 | Guillemot | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5430433 | Shima | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5432500 | Scripps | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5530433 | Morita | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5564626 | Kettler et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5565852 | Peltier et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5568121 | Lamensdorf | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5574435 | Mochizuki | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5627515 | Anderson | May 1997 | A |
| 5655561 | Wendel et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5719556 | Albin et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5723848 | Bilenko et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5736928 | Tice et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5748092 | Arsenault et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5854994 | Canada et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5859536 | Stockton | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5881951 | Carpenter | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5889468 | Banga | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892758 | Argyroudis | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5898374 | Schepka | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5907491 | Canada et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5914656 | Ojala et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5923102 | Koenig et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5949332 | Kim | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959529 | Kail, IV | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5966079 | Tanguay | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5973603 | Judy | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6023476 | Lo | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6025788 | Diduck | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6031455 | Grube et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6049273 | Hess | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6060994 | Chen | May 2000 | A |
| 6072784 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6075451 | Lebowitz et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078050 | Castleman | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078269 | Markwell et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6084522 | Addy | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6097288 | Koeppe | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6108614 | Lincoln et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6111511 | Sivathanu et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6124806 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6157307 | Hardin | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6175310 | Gott | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6208247 | Agre et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6215404 | Morales | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6281840 | Miyoshi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6313646 | Davis et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6320501 | Tice et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6366217 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6369714 | Walter | Apr 2002 | B2 |
| 6377181 | Kroll et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6380860 | Goetz | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6388399 | Eckel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6420973 | Acevedo | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6421539 | Jeong | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421731 | Ciotti et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6437692 | Petite et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6441731 | Hess | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6445292 | Jen et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6452493 | Ma et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453687 | Sharood et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6489895 | Apelman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6515283 | Castleman et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6519509 | Nierlich et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6526807 | Doumit et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6535110 | Arora et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6552647 | Thiesen et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6553336 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6583720 | Quigley | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6601016 | Brown | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6615658 | Snelling | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6619055 | Addy | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6624750 | Marman | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6639517 | Chapman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6666086 | Colman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6679400 | Goodman | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6690657 | Lau et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6704681 | Nassof et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6714977 | Fowler et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6731215 | Harms et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6735630 | Gelvin et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6748804 | Lisec et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6759956 | Menard et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6789220 | Lovejoy | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6789739 | Rosen | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6796187 | Srinivasan et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6798220 | Flanigan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6798341 | Eckel et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6803728 | Balasubramaniam et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6825758 | Laitsaari | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6825777 | Vock et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6826948 | Bhatti et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
| 6851621 | Wacker et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6891470 | Bohinc | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6891838 | Petite et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
| 6892751 | Sanders | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6909921 | Bilger | Jun 2005 | B1 |
| 6930596 | Kulesz et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6935570 | Acker | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6940403 | Kail | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6965314 | Bohinc | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6995676 | Amacher | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7042352 | Kates | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7055759 | Wacker et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7063667 | Ben-Oren et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7102504 | Kates | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7102505 | Kates | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7109879 | Stults et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7135965 | Chapman et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7142107 | Kates | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7142123 | Kates | Nov 2006 | B1 |
| 7218237 | Kates | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7221260 | Berezowski | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7228726 | Kates | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7230528 | Kates | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7256505 | Arms et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7289761 | Mazar | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7336168 | Kates | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7348875 | Hughes et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7411494 | Kates | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7412876 | Kates | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7434742 | Mueller et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7460690 | Cohen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7469550 | Chapman et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7528711 | Kates | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7561057 | Kates | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7571865 | Nicodem et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7579945 | Richter et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
| 7583198 | Kates | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7623028 | Kates | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7626508 | Kosuge et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7703694 | Mueller et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| D614976 | Skafdrup et al. | May 2010 | S |
| 7735118 | Brok et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7817031 | Kates | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7837958 | Crapser et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7904209 | Podgorny et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7975292 | Corella | Jul 2011 | B2 |
| 7994928 | Richmond | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8016205 | Drew | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8037022 | Rahman et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8098166 | Lang | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8228183 | Glenn et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8234694 | Youn et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
| 8255090 | Frader-Thompson et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8589174 | Nelson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 9183733 | Kates | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9286787 | Kates | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9286788 | Kates | Mar 2016 | B2 |
| 9318015 | Kates | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9357490 | Kates | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9412260 | Kates | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 20020005707 | Kerai et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020011570 | Castleman | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020011923 | Cunningham | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020030592 | Hakanen et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020033759 | Morello | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020075145 | Hardman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020084414 | Baker et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020102979 | Curley et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020124169 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020126005 | Hardman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020130771 | Osborne et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020158775 | Wallace | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020186141 | Jen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030011428 | Yamakawa et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030011482 | Harms et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030025612 | Holmes et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030037125 | Luman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030043763 | Grayson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030058093 | Dohi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030114898 | Von Ark et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030122677 | Kail | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030146833 | Johnston et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030151513 | Herrmann et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030162504 | Sabongi et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030167391 | Al-Ali | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030189948 | Sashihara | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030199247 | Striemer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030214400 | Mizutani et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030220075 | Baker et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030228846 | Berliner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20030231001 | Bruning | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040007264 | Bootka | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040017291 | Hardman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040019783 | Hawkes | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040023629 | Klank | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040050429 | Aylward | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040062224 | Brownrigg et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040066271 | Leck | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040090329 | Hitt | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040090924 | Giaimo et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102864 | Stack et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137959 | Salzhauer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040150516 | Faetanini | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040164238 | Xu et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040176028 | Dibernardo | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181693 | Milliot et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040193876 | Donley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040217858 | Ingley et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040222884 | Costa et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224631 | Davis et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040233855 | Gutierrez et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040233874 | Baker | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263340 | Pearson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050012601 | Matsubara et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050030175 | Wolfe | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050035877 | Kim | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043907 | Eckel et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050046563 | Whitney | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050053063 | Madhavan | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050062605 | Sutphin | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050088299 | Bandy | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050105841 | Luo et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050116667 | Mueller et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050125083 | Kiko | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050128067 | Zakrewski | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131652 | Corwin et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050187867 | Sokolic et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050194456 | Tessier et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050200475 | Chen | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228991 | Schmit | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050246408 | Chung | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050258974 | Mahowald | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262923 | Kates | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050270151 | Winick | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275527 | Kates | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275528 | Kates | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275529 | Kates | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275530 | Kates | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050275547 | Kates | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060007008 | Kates | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060032379 | Kates | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060041680 | Proctor et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060059977 | Kates | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060063484 | Proctor et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060068832 | Islam | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060098592 | Proctor et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147003 | Archacki et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060164257 | Giubbini | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206273 | Reichel et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060208099 | Chapman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060256756 | Wakabayashi | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060267756 | Kates | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060273896 | Kates | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070001854 | Chung et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070038787 | Harris et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070040673 | Bohine | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043478 | Ehlers et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070063833 | Kates | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070090946 | Kates | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070114295 | Jenkens | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070115902 | Shamoon et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070139183 | Kates | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070211076 | Kates | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070229237 | Kates | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070234784 | Kates | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070266575 | Nash | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080015742 | Kulyk et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080099568 | Nicodem et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080141754 | Kates | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221737 | Josephson et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080228904 | Crespo-Dubie | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080278310 | Kates | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080278315 | Kates | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080278316 | Kates | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080278342 | Kates | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080284590 | Kates | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080302172 | Kates | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080303654 | Kates | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090057427 | Geadelmann et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090143918 | Amundson et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090153336 | Kates | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090194601 | Flohr | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20100058450 | Fein et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100156608 | Bae et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100163633 | Barrett et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100168924 | Tessier et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100199086 | Kuang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100238036 | Holcombe | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110001812 | Kang et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110025501 | Kates | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110078675 | Van Camp et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110119747 | Lambiase | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151837 | Winbush | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110282937 | Deshpande et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20140203943 | Kates | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140285336 | Kates | Sep 2014 | A1 |
| 20140333423 | Kates | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20140333434 | Kates | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150061868 | Kates | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150061892 | Kates | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150070192 | Kates | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150172887 | Petite | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20160029315 | Kates | Jan 2016 | A1 |
| 20160247382 | Kates | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2388660 | Jul 2000 | CN |
| 3415786 | Nov 1984 | DE |
| 0070449 | Jan 1983 | EP |
| 0093463 | Nov 1983 | EP |
| 0346152 | Dec 1989 | EP |
| 0346152 | Oct 1990 | EP |
| 0580298 | Jan 1997 | EP |
| 0930492 | Jul 1999 | EP |
| 0441999 | Aug 1999 | EP |
| 231458 | Jan 1926 | GB |
| 2278471 | Nov 1994 | GB |
| 9298780 | Nov 1997 | JP |
| 10258189 | Sep 1998 | JP |
| WO-9810393 | Mar 1998 | WO |
| WO-0021047 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO-0055825 | Sep 2000 | WO |
| WO-03009631 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO-2004010398 | Jan 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004073326 | Aug 2004 | WO |
| WO-2004100763 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| WO-2005010837 | Feb 2005 | WO |
| WO-2008054938 | May 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| “Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/168,876, Jun. 10, 2015, 3 pages. |
| “Advisory Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/536,108, Sep. 3, 2015, 4 pages. |
| “Best Way to Contra/Indoor Molds, Dust Mites, and other Microorganisms: Measuring and Controlling Indoor Humidity [Brochure]”, Indoor Health Products, Inc. (2001-2002). Layton, Utah: Indoor Health Products, Inc. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.relativehumidity-sensor.com> on Jun. 18, 2004, 3 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,395, Apr. 13, 2006, 8 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,395, Oct. 30, 2006, 10 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/314,807, Apr. 1, 2008, 5 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/314,807, Jul. 16, 2007, 5 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,352, Aug. 21, 2008, 14 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/036,915, Jul. 8, 2009, 5 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/168,876, Mar. 18, 2015, 10 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/298,371, Mar. 6, 2015, 17 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/338,592, May 29, 2015, 22 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,234, Aug. 20, 2015, 12 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/534,848, Nov. 23, 2015, 13 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/536,108, May 26, 2015, 18 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/536,108, Jun. 13, 2016, 16 pages. |
| “Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/548,137, Sep. 1, 2015, 13 pages. |
| “First Action Interview Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/338,592, Mar. 24, 2015, 4 pages. |
| “First Action Interview Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,234, Mar. 24, 2015, 8 pages. |
| “First Alert—User's Manual Smoke and Fire Alarm: Battery Powered Photoelectric Smoke Alarm with Silence and Escape Light: Model SA720 [Brochure]”, Mexico: First Alert, 2007, 6 pages. |
| “G-Cap 2 Relative Humidity Sensor [Brochure]”, GE General Eastern Instruments—GlobalSpec.com—Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.globalspec.com/FeaturedProducts/Detaii?ExhibitiD=1454> on Jun. 18, 2004, 2 pages. |
| “Impedance Moisture Sensor Technology [Brochure].”, Michell Instruments L To. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.sensorland.com/HowPage029.html> on Jun. 18, 2004, 2 pages. |
| “Mechanical Data Sheet: PT(S-PQFP-G48) Plastic Quad Flatpack, [Brochure].”, Texas Instruments, Inc. (1996). Dallas, Texas: Texas Instruments, Inc., 1996, 2 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,231, Apr. 5, 2006, 4 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,231, Dec. 21, 2005, 8 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,387, Dec. 14, 2005, 9 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,390, Dec. 15, 2005, 8 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,395, Oct. 3, 2005, 6 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,717, May 31, 2006, 7 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,717, Dec. 14, 2005, 7 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,628, Sep. 8, 2006, 14 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,880, Mar. 1, 2007, 4 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,880, Apr. 27, 2006, 4 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/216,225, Mar. 4, 2008, 10 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/216,225, Jul. 10, 2008, 6 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/231,321, Jul. 24, 2006, 8 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/233,931, Jul. 10, 2006, 9 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/314,807, Jan. 18, 2007, 5 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/494,988, Mar. 5, 2009, 7 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,313, Sep. 5, 2007, 5 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,352, Jan. 14, 2008, 5 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/748,388, Dec. 17, 2008, 5 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/761,760, Jan. 16, 2008, 15 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/036,915, Oct. 8, 2008, 6 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,079, Feb. 26, 2010, 7 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/905,248, Aug. 30, 2013, 20 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/168,876, Sep. 15, 2014, 9 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/298,371, Sep. 9, 2014, 9 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/338,592, Mar. 2, 2015, 12 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/534,848, Jun. 1, 2015, 19 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/536,108, Dec. 3, 2015, 17 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/875,488, Dec. 18, 2015, 6 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/090,973, Jun. 15, 2016, 10 pages. |
| “Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/161,880, Jul. 12, 2016, 10 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,170, Dec. 13, 2005, 7 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,231, Jun. 28, 2006, 4 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,387, Jun. 23, 2006, 6 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,390, Jun. 27, 2006, 7 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/856,717, Mar. 13, 2007, 6 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,628, Apr. 9, 2007, 6 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,628, May 3, 2007, 2 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,880, Jul. 5, 2007, 6 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,880, Sep. 21, 2007, 4 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/216,225, Mar. 10, 2009, 8 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/231,321, Mar. 21, 2007, 4 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/233,931, Aug. 10, 2006, 8 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/314,807, Dec. 24, 2008, 4 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/494,988, Jul. 17, 2009, 6 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,313, May 23, 2008, 6 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/748,388, May 19, 2009, 12 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/761,760, Jul. 1, 2008, 6 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/182,079, Jun. 23, 2010, 6 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/168,876, Feb. 12, 2016, 5 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/298,371, Jul. 2, 2015, 5 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,234, Oct. 27, 2015, 9 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/548,137, Dec. 10, 2015, 5 pages. |
| “Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/875,488, Apr. 8, 2016, 5 pages. |
| “Preinterview First Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/338,592, Oct. 31, 2014, 4 pages. |
| “Preinterview First Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/339,234, Nov. 19, 2014, 5 pages. |
| “Relative Humidity Information [Brochure]”, Indoor Health Products, Inc. (2002) Layton, Utah: Indoor Health Products, Inc. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.relativehumidity-sensor.com/relative-humidity.html> on Jun. 18, 2004, 6 pages. |
| “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,628, Apr. 20, 2006, 7 pages. |
| “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 10/948,628, Dec. 30, 2005, 6 pages. |
| “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/562,313, Feb. 22, 2008, 5 pages. |
| “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/761,760, Oct. 11, 2007, 6 pages. |
| “Restriction Requirement”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/193,641, Apr. 3, 2009, 7 pages. |
| “Supplemental Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 11/145,880, Dec. 10, 2007, 2 pages. |
| “TRF6901 Single-Chip RF Transceiver Product Catalog [Brochure].”, Texas Instruments, Inc. (2001-2003). Dallas, Texas: Texas Instruments, Inc., 27 pages. |
| “Waterbug: Electronic water detection at its best! [Brochure].”, Winland Electronics, Inc. (2011). Mankato, Minnesota: Winland Electronics Inc. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:www.winland.com>, 2011, 1 page. |
| “Ways to Prevent Mold Problems [Brochure].”, Toxic Black Mold Information Center. (2002). Layton, Utah: Toxic Black Mold Information Center. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.toxic-black-mold-info.com/prevent.html> on Jun. 18, 2004, 12 pages. |
| Bourke,“Server Load Balancing”, Sebastopol, California: O'Reilly Associates, 2001, 182 pages. |
| GIRA,“Gira Dua/NdS smoke alarm: Double safety by measuring heat and scattered light. [Brochure]”, Radevormwald, Germany: GIRA. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.gira.de/gebaeudetechniklprodukte/sicherheit/rauchmelder/rauchwarnmelderdualvds.html> on Apr. 18, 2013,, 7 pages. |
| GIRA,“Gira Dua/VdS smoke alarm: Double safety by measuring heat and scattered light [Brochure]”, Radevormwald, Germany: GIRA. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.gira.de/gebaeudetechniklprodukte/sicherheit/rauchmelder/rauchwarnmelderdualvds.html> on Apr. 18, 2013,, 14 pages. |
| GIRA,“Installation and user manual: Smoke alarm device Dua/VdS [Brochure]”, Radevormwald, Germany: GIRA. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://download.gira.de/data2/2330121 O.pdf> on Apr. 18, 2013., 20 pages. |
| Kidde,“Battery Operated Smoke Alarm with Hush: Model i9060 [Brochure].”, Mebane, North Carolina: Kidde, 2009, 2 pages. |
| White,“A Conceptual Model for Simulation Load Balancing”, , Proc. 1998 Spring Simulation interoperability Workshop, 1998, 7 pages. |
| Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/534,848, Aug. 11, 2016, 12 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11562313 | Nov 2006 | US |
| Child | 12182079 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 14875488 | Oct 2015 | US |
| Child | 15179350 | US | |
| Parent | 14298371 | Jun 2014 | US |
| Child | 14875488 | US | |
| Parent | 14168876 | Jan 2014 | US |
| Child | 14298371 | US | |
| Parent | 12905248 | Oct 2010 | US |
| Child | 14168876 | US | |
| Parent | 12182079 | Jul 2008 | US |
| Child | 12905248 | US | |
| Parent | 10856231 | May 2004 | US |
| Child | 11562313 | US |
