Most commercial fertilizers, such as urea, dissolve quickly in water. When applied to lawns or agricultural crops, most of the fertilizer dissolves rapidly in the moisture in the soil. Often, such fertilizers dissolve at a rate that exceeds the rate at which it can be used by plants. This can cause a number of significant problems. First, the excess fertilizer can leach into the groundwater, where it can cause potentially serious environmental damage. In addition, excessive concentration of fertilizer in the vicinity of a plant may result in “burning” of the plant roots.
Because of these problems, it is often necessary to apply these fertilizers in several light doses throughout the growing season, rather than in a single heavy application. However, the need for repeat applications increases labor costs. Worse, repeat applications may cause physical damage to the growing plants because the fertilizer spreading equipment must pass over the plants several times.
In order to avoid the need for repeat applications, various slow or controlled release fertilizers have been developed. For examples, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,042,366, 5,147,443, 5,435,821, and 6,231,633. These fertilizers can be applied at the beginning of the growing season and provide an initial high release of fertilizer followed by a slower, gradual release throughout the growing season. Slow or controlled release fertilizers are widely used on home lawns, public lawns, golf courses, home gardens, plant nurseries, and on horticultural crops.
Polymer coated fertilizers are the most technically advanced controlled release fertilizers. Different methods of manufacturing are utilized to produce polymer coated fertilizers. For examples, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,019,890, 4,369,055, 5,176,734, 5,211,985, 5,374,292, 5,858,094, and 6,338,746. Polymer coated controlled release fertilizers are typically produced by coating water insoluble semi-permeable polymer layer onto the fertilizer granules. Over time the fertilizer is released into the soil through diffusion from this semi-permeable coating. One of the disadvantages in existing methods is that uniform polymer coating thickness is difficult to achieve. Another disadvantage is that it is hard to control the thickness of the polymer that is applied the fertilizer. Yet another disadvantage is that most of these manufacturing processes are batch type processes which are expensive. Yet another disadvantage with existing processes is that they require multiple applications of polymer to increase the thickness of the polymer coating around the fertilizer.
A method of manufacturing a controlled release fertilizer wherein the fertilizer is deposited onto a first polymer film and then covered by a second polymer film to encapsulate the fertilizer between the first polymer film and the second polymer film.
The invention provides a method of manufacturing a controlled release fertilizer 14 wherein the fertilizer 14 is deposited onto a first polymer film and then covered by a second polymer film to encapsulate the fertilizer 14 between the first polymer film and the second polymer film. The preferred polymer film is any suitable polymer. The fertilizer 14 may be any suitable fertilizer, including urea.
The fertilizer 14 is deposited onto the film 10 at the fertilizer deposition station 16, which may be any suitable device capable of depositing fertilizer 14 onto the film 10. Examples of fertilizer deposition stations 16 are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,398,989 and 5,395,560. The preferred embodiment deposits molten (liquid) fertilizer 14 onto the film 10, however, in other embodiments, solid granules of fertilizer may be deposited onto the polymer film 10. The preferred deposition station 16 is a Rotoformer (developed by Sandvik Corporation). This fertilizer deposition station 16 deposits the drops of fertilizer 14 at approximately equal distances from each other onto the film 10.
In the embodiment where the deposited fertilizer 14 is in its molten state, the fertilizer 14 is shaped like a hemisphere after being deposited on the film 10. This hemispherical shape is seen best in
As shown in
After the fertilizer 14 droplets have hardened, the second polymer film is deposited onto the top of the fertilizer 14. In the embodiment shown in
In an alternate embodiment show in
In an alternate embodiment shown in
As shown in
The heat is transferred through the conveyor belt 20 to the fertilizer 14 droplets while the water drains into a holding take for reuse. A heat exchanger 28 or some similar means may be used to heat the water. Other heating devices such as radiant heaters can be used.
As shown in
As shown in
The final step of the process is to separate the individually encapsulated fertilizer 14 droplets so that the individual pellets may be spread onto the ground. This cutting step may be performed by any suitable cutting device, including a laser or a punching machine. In one embodiment, the cutting device is a standard cutting machine like those used in processes to cut labels, paper, or packaging cartons.
The release rate of the fertilizer 14 in the controlled release fertilizer pellets can be controlled by varying the composition and thickness of the polymer films. The present invention allows a high degree of control related to the type and quantity of the polymer used and thus allows the release rate of the final product to be specifically tailored to fit many different growing situations. The ability to use a wide range of polymers with tight control over coating thickness provides a very precise and predictable fertilizer release rate.
One reason the invention allows a high degree of release rate control is because many different types of polymer compositions may be used in the present invention. This is beneficial because different polymers may have different moisture barrier properties which can result in varying fertilizer 14 release rates. For example, the following polymer films may all be used: virgin/recycled polyethylene, biopolymers, polypropylene, polystyrene, high impact polystyrene, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polyethylene terephthalate, polyester, polyamides, polyvinyl chloride, polyurethanes, polycarbonate, polyvinylidene chloride, polylactic acid, starch based polymers, and aminoplastic resin. One reason a wide variety of polymers may be used with this invention is because polymer film formation onto the fertilizer 14 surface is not required to bind the polymers to the fertilizer Further, for all embodiments described above, the first polymer film (bottom layer of polymer 10) may be made of a different composition than the second polymer film (top layer of polymer 12, 30, 40).
Another reason the invention allows a high degree of release rate control is because the lamination (
Yet another reason why invention allows a high degree of release rate control is because top polymer film 12, 30, 40 and bottom polymer film 10 may be made of multiple layers of different polymers and these layers may have different thickness. For example the top layer 12, 30, 40 and bottom layer 10 may have two or more layers of polymers each and these layers may have different thicknesses.
Yet another reason why the invention allows a high degree of release rate control is because the first and second polymer films may be made of different thicknesses. The first and second polymer films may be pre-manufactured using cast/blown film extrusion or co-extrusion process. These processes are well known commercially and are commonly used to manufacture polymeric films of very precise thickness. Another advantage of this process is the ability to make films of multiple layers. For example a film containing seven or more layers of different polymers of different thicknesses can be made at high speed using cast film co-extrusion process.
Yet another reason the invention provides a high degree of fertilizer release rate control is that various additives may be added into the polymer films during manufacturing for customizing the film properties. For example hydrophilic additives may be added into the polymer during the manufacturing to increase the fertilizer release or biodegradation additive may be added for customizing the polymer rate of degradation in soil.
Having thus described the invention in connection with the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that various revisions can be made to the preferred embodiments described herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is my intention, however, that all such revisions and modifications that are evident to those skilled in the art will be included with in the scope of the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/191,422, filed Aug. 14, 2008, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/935,464 filed Aug. 14, 2007, U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/994,247 filed Sep. 17, 2007, and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/994,245 filed Sep. 17, 2007, the complete disclosures of which are hereby expressly incorporated by this reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3001228 | Nack | Sep 1961 | A |
4004870 | Guttinger et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4019890 | Fujita et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4042366 | Fersch et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4369055 | Fujita et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
5147443 | Diehr et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5176734 | Fujita et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5211985 | Shirley, Jr. et al. | May 1993 | A |
5374292 | Detrick et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5395560 | Schwager | Mar 1995 | A |
5435821 | Duvdevani et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5858094 | Detrick et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6231633 | Hirano et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6338746 | Detrick et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6398989 | Bergstrom | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6510941 | Schermutzki et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6716498 | Curro et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6749659 | Yu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6818087 | Roreger et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7452399 | Whittington | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7572525 | McDonald | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7931729 | Santosh | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20030176853 | Brines et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040067305 | Nageli et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050163714 | Sukhishvili et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060024480 | Lyons et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060275335 | McKernan et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110214466 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60935464 | Aug 2007 | US | |
60994247 | Sep 2007 | US | |
60994245 | Sep 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12191422 | Aug 2008 | US |
Child | 13092754 | US |