The invention relates to a controller for a fuel injector and a method of operating a fuel injector. More specifically, the invention relates to a method of operating a piezoelectrically actuated fuel injector in order to improve the consistency of pilot fuel injection events.
In the context of an internal combustion engine, it is known to deliver fuel into the cylinders of the engine by means of a fuel injector. One such type of fuel injector that permits precise metering of fuel delivery is a so-called ‘piezoelectric injector’.
With reference to
The piezoelectric injector is controlled by an injector control unit (ICU) 20 that forms an integral part of an engine control unit (ECU) 22. The ECU continuously monitors a plurality of engine parameters 24 and feeds an engine power requirement signal to the ICU 20. The ICU 20 calculates (using processor 21) a required injection event sequence to provide the required power for the engine and outputs a voltage pulse profile 25 to an injector drive circuit 26. In turn, the injector drive circuit 26 applies the voltage drive profile 25 to the injector via a high side voltage signal VHI and a low side voltage signal VLO.
In order to initiate an injection, the drive circuit 26 causes the differential voltage between VHI and VLO to transition from a high voltage (typically 250V) at which no fuel delivery occurs, to a relatively low voltage (typically 50 V), which initiates fuel delivery. An injector responsive to this drive waveform is referred to as a ‘de-energise to inject’ injector.
Such a fuel injector is operable to deliver one or more injections of fuel within a single injection event. For example, the injection event may include one or more so-called ‘pre’ or ‘pilot’ injections, a main injection, and one or more ‘post’ injections. In general, several such injections within a single injection event are preferred to increase combustion efficiency of the engine.
A typical injector drive voltage profile applied to the injector during an injection event is shown in
The injector drive voltage profile comprises first and second pilot discharge pulses P1 and P2 and a single main injection discharge pulse PMAIN. The magnitude and duration of each of the pilot discharge pulse P1, P2 are substantially equal. Accordingly, the delivery rate for each pilot injection P1, P2 is substantially equal and, thus, the volume of fuel delivered (the area under the curve) is consistent between pilot injections.
It has been observed, however, that the actual delivery quantity between pilot injections for the same voltage discharge profile varies considerably. For example,
The purpose of a pilot injection is to deliver a precise amount of fuel into the combustion chamber prior to the main injection in order to initiate the combustion process gradually. Therefore, a variation in fuel delivery between pilot injections is undesirable since it reduces the controllability of the combustion process. Therefore, a method of regulating the volume of fuel delivered between pilot injections is required.
Against this background, according to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a controller for controlling the operation of a fuel injector having a piezoelectric actuator, the actuator being operable by the application of a voltage drive profile across the actuator, the controller comprising: inputs for receiving data relating to one or more engine parameters; a processor for determining a voltage drive profile for controlling the actuator in dependence upon the one or more engine parameters, the voltage drive profile being arranged to comprise an activating voltage component to initiate an injection event and a deactivating voltage component to terminate the injection event, the activating and deactivating voltage components being separated by a time interval TON; outputs for outputting the voltage drive profile as determined by the processor to the actuator wherein the processor is arranged to set the time interval TON greater than or equal to a predetermined pressure wave time period (TP) of a pressure wave cycle within the injector.
The present invention provides the advantage of improving the fuel delivery consistency between injection events by compensating for pressure wave effects within the injector. It has been noted that by increasing the injector “on” time (the time interval between start of discharge and start of charge) such that it is greater than or equal to the time it takes a pressure wave (caused by the disengagement and re-engagement of a valve needle during an injector event) to travel up the fuel passages within the injector and then return back down to the injector tip, the effects of the pressure wave on the subsequent injection even can be reduced.
Conveniently, the injector on period is greater than the pressure wave period. Preferably, the injector on period is chosen such that it is a multiple of the pressure wave time period.
As a consequence of increasing the injector on time there will be an increase in the fuel injected by the injector. Conveniently, if it is desired to maintain fuelling levels then the controller can reduce the peak voltage levels of the voltage drive profile sent to the actuator in order to maintain a constant amount of injected fuel at any given engine operating condition.
Conveniently, the controller maintains a stored record or pressure wave time periods in dependence on various engine operating conditions.
Preferably, the controller comprises a function map of the pressure wave time period in dependence on engine operating parameters and refers to the function map when setting the value for the injector on time. The function map may conveniently be stored in a data store within or associated with the controller.
The controller of the first aspect of the present invention may conveniently be incorporated within a vehicle's engine control unit.
According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of operating a fuel injector having a piezoelectric actuator operable by applying an activating voltage level across the actuator to initiate an injection event and a deactivating voltage across the actuator to terminate an injection event, the method comprising: applying an activating voltage to the actuator so as to initiate an injection event, and, after a predetermined time interval (TON); applying a deactivating voltage to the actuator so as to terminate injection; wherein the predetermined time interval is selected to be greater than or equal to a predetermined pressure wave time period (TP) of a pressure wave cycle within the injector.
The predetermined pressure wave time period may be determined in one of two ways. The time period can physically be measured on a test rig prior to normal engine usage and the measured values stored (e.g. in a function map) for later use. Alternatively, the time period can be calculated based on the known dimensions and geometry of the fuel delivery system.
Preferred features of the first aspect of the invention may also be applied to the second aspect of the invention.
Reference has already been made to
Referring to
The Applicant has identified that it is possible to compensate for the pressure wave effects in the injector 2 and guard against substantial variation between pilot injections by modifying the pilot injection voltage discharge waveform.
The proposed solution is to minimise the delivery volume variation to control two aspects of the discharge profile:
The above aspects are shown in
As a result of the above steps, during the second pilot injection P2, the valve needle opening duration is approximately equal to the time period for a single pressure oscillation. Thus, the fuel pressure at the nozzle outlets increases to a relatively high pressure and a relatively low pressure during the same pilot delivery period. The result is that the area under the second pilot injection delivery profile (Area B) is substantially equal to the area under the first pilot injection delivery profile (Area A). Put another way, the total delivery volume is substantially unaffected by the standing wave set up in the injector nozzle and the pilot injection separation.
The above voltage discharge waveform is applicable to a ‘de-energise to inject’ injector. However, it should be appreciated that the invention is also applicable to a so-called ‘energise to inject’ injector. In such an injector, an injection event is initiated by applying a voltage charge pulse to the actuator rather than a voltage discharge pulse.
In other words, in the “de energise to inject” case the “activating voltage component” of the voltage drive profile is a voltage discharge pulse and the “deactivating voltage component” is a voltage charge pulse. In the “energise to inject case” the “activating voltage component” of the voltage drive profile is a voltage charge pulse and the “deactivating voltage component” is a voltage discharge pulse
It is to be appreciated that that the injector on time TON need not be selected to be equal to the pressure wave time period. In another embodiment, the injector on time TON may be selected to be greater than the pressure wave time period.
It is noted that the effect of the present invention will be to reduce the delivery error as depicted in
The pressure wave time period may be calculated with reference to the geometry and dimensions of the fuel injection system or alternatively can be measured on a test rig. In either case, the pressure wave time period for a given engine operating parameter may conveniently be stored in a function map 30 within the controller 20 (as indicated in
It will be understood that the embodiments described above are given by way of example only and are not intended to limit the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims. It will also be understood that the embodiments described may be used individually or in combination.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0610230.5 | May 2006 | GB | national |
0621156.9 | Oct 2006 | GB | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4784102 | Igashira et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
5235954 | Sverdlin | Aug 1993 | A |
6213098 | Kato et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6311669 | Przymusinski et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6364221 | Czimmek | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6792921 | Forck et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6907864 | Takemoto | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6986339 | Joos et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7034437 | Fukagawa et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7089914 | Joos et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7124741 | Cagnoni et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7140353 | Rauznitz et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7318417 | Lang et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20060152879 | Rueger et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
11-159372 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2006-503533 | Jan 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070273247 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |