This invention is in the field of processing signals in or for hearing instruments. It more particularly relates to a method of controlling a gain setting in a hearing instrument, and to a hearing instrument.
Binaural loudness summation is known in the field of audiology. Binaural loudness summation is the effect that the loudness of sound is greater when it is presented to both ears simultaneously than when it is presented to one ear alone. The magnitude of this effect varies between individuals. Usually, the increase in loudness is approximately 3 dB when the intensity level is near the person's hearing threshold. The effect increases at suprathreshold level.
Binaural loudness summation is one of the advantages of binaural amplification. For persons with bilateral hearing loss who are equipped with two hearing instruments, the applied gain may be reduced. Due to the reduced gain, the chance of feedback is decreased, and larger vents may be used.
Since the optimal gain is different between monaural and binaural fittings, the loss of binaural loudness summation accounts for a non-ideal gain fitting if a user, who usually wears two hearing instruments, occasionally only uses one hearing instrument. This may happen if the user deliberately only wears one hearing instrument or if one of the hearing instruments is not available.
It is an object of this invention to provide a method of controlling a gain in a hearing instrument which allows to provide optimal gain characteristics in both, situations when the user wears two hearing instruments and situations when the user only wears one hearing instrument.
According to a first aspect of the invention, in a hearing instrument being operable to determine an output audio signal from at least one input signal and to supply said output audio signal to one ear of a user, the hearing instrument comprising a communication interface operable to establish a communication link to a further hearing instrument, a method of controlling a gain setting of a hearing instrument comprises the steps of determining, using the communication interface, whether a further hearing instrument for the other ear of the user is active, of adopting a first gain setting if a further hearing instrument for the other ear of the user is active, and of adopting a second gain setting different from the first gain setting if no further hearing instrument is active.
Preferably, therefore, it is once or repeatedly checked whether a second hearing instrument is present and active. If a second hearing instrument is active on the contralateral side, a first gain setting is adopted. If, however, no further hearing instrument is found to be active, a second gain setting is chosen. The gain generated by the hearing instrument with the first gain setting may correspond to the gain for binaural fitting, whereas the gain of the second gain setting is increased in comparison. The second gain may simply correspond to the first gain increased by a certain dB value. It may as an alternative be a specifically adapted gain characteristic of a monaural fitting for the user.
According to a second aspect, in a hearing instrument system comprising a first and a second hearing instrument, the first and the second hearing instrument adapted to supply, upon incidence of an input signal, a first and a second output audio signal to a first and a second ear of a user, respectively, a method of setting hearing instrument parameters, the method comprises the steps of, by at least one of said first and said second hearing instruments, polling a status information from the other one of said first and second hearing instruments, and of setting, by said one hearing instrument, a hearing instrument parameter depending on the status of said other hearing instrument.
According to a third aspect, in a hearing instrument system comprising a first and a second hearing instrument, the first and the second hearing instrument adapted to supply, upon incidence of an input signal, a first and a second output audio signal to a first and a second ear of a user, respectively, a method of setting a hearing instrument parameter, the method comprises the steps of proactively sending, by at least one of said first and second hearing instruments, repeatedly and/or in case of imminent instrument failure, a status signal to the other one of said first and second hearing instruments, and of setting, by said other hearing a hearing instrument parameter depending on the status signal received.
In the second and third aspect, the hearing instrument parameter may be a gain setting, wherein a first gain setting is adopted if the other hearing instrument is found to be in a normal operational state, and a second gain setting different from the first gain setting is adopted if said other hearing instrument is found not to be in the normal operational state. As an alternative or in addition thereto, a set parameter may include a status parameter of a signaling unit operable to display or have resound a system status to a user.
The invention also concerns a hearing instrument comprising a signal processing unit operable to generate an output signal from at least one input signal and an electric-to-acoustic converter, an input of which is operatively connected to an output of the signal processing unit and which is operable to supply an acoustic output signal to one ear of a user, the hearing instrument further comprising a communication interface operable to exchange information with a further hearing instrument, the hearing instrument being programmed so as to be operable to detect, using the communication interface, whether a further hearing instrument associated with the other ear of the user is active, and to apply a first gain to the input signal if a further hearing instrument is found to be active, or to apply a second gain to the input signal if no further hearing instrument is found to be active.
“Gain” is usually defined as the ratio between an input signal and an output signal. This ratio may be time-dependent and/or may be frequency dependent. In addition, the gain may be situation dependent (i.e. different gain settings for different hearing programs, which are associated to different acoustic situations).
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, there exists some wireless or wired communication channel between the hearing instruments, across which there is a continuous or repeated communication between the hearing instruments.
A wireless communication channel may be a radio signal transmission or an inductive signal transmission (i.e., using magnetically coupled coils as antennas) or any other suitable wireless communication channel. The signal used may be any signal transmitting any information. In a most simple example, the signal may just be a characteristic regularly repeated presence signal (e.g. a radio frequency carrier signal).
A wired communication channel may for example comprise a physical wire or may comprise the frame of a user's glasses.
Since the only information that has to be transmitted is whether or not a second hearing instrument is active, the communication channel does not have to have a large bandwidth. Compared to prior art communication channels between two hearing instruments, the communication channel may therefore consume comparatively little power.
One of the often encountered reasons for a situation where only one hearing instrument of a binaural system is available is if the battery is empty. For this case, the remaining hearing instrument may, according to a special embodiment of the invention, initiate a signal informing the user of the battery failure of the unavailable hearing instrument and reminding the user to replace the battery of said hearing instrument. Such a signal may be a beep signal, a voice message (like for example “left hearing aid not available” or “change battery of left hearing aid” etc.), a message displayed on a display unit of a remote control etc. According to the prior art, it was possible to produce a warning signal when the battery in a hearing instrument was not yet empty but found to be low. However, it is a well-known fact that the battery charge level in a hearing aid is a quantity that is difficult to measure, at least without extra hardware, so that the “battery-low” warning signals are often unreliable.
A warning signal of this kind is, of course, not produced upon every check but for example only once when the other hearing instrument is found to be unavailable for the first time. The occurrence of such a signal may but does not have to depend on a manually set switch value. For example, the user may switch to a monaural mode in which he deliberately uses one hearing instrument only, in which case a signal will not be output.
The term “hearing instrument” or “hearing device”, as understood here, denotes on the one hand hearing aid devices that are therapeutic devices improving the hearing ability of individuals, primarily according to diagnostic results. Such hearing aid devices may be Behind-The-Ear hearing aid devices or In-The-Ear hearing aid devices (including the so called In-The-Canal and Completely-In-The-Canal hearing aid devices, as well as partially and fully implanted hearing aid devices). On the other hand, the term stands for devices which may improve the hearing of individuals with normal hearing e.g. in specific acoustical situations as in a very noisy environment or in concert halls, or which may even be used in the context of remote communication or of audio listening, for instance as provided by headphones.
The hearing devices addressed by the present invention are so-called active hearing devices which comprise at the input side at least one acoustical to electrical converter, such as a microphone, at the output side at least one electrical to acoustical converter, such as a loudspeaker (often also termed “receiver”), and which further comprise a signal processing unit for processing signals according to the output signals of the acoustical to electrical converter and for generating output signals to the electrical input of the electrical to mechanical output converter. In general, the signal processing circuit may be an analog, digital or hybrid analog-digital circuit, and may be implemented with discrete electronic components, integrated circuits, or a combination of both.
In the following, embodiments of the invention are described with reference to drawings. The drawings are all schematical and show:
The hearing instrument system of
An embodiment of the method according to the invention—as implemented in at least one, preferably in both of the hearing instruments—is illustrated in
The second gain (corresponding to the second gain setting) is higher compared to the first gain. In case the gain is frequency dependent, this means that an average of the gain the audible part of the sound spectrum is higher. The second gain may be specifically adapted to monaural hearing and to the characteristic hearing ability of the ear to which the remaining hearing instrument is associated. In other words, the second gain and possibly also the first gain need not be identical for both hearing instruments of a hearing instrument system. An example of a gain increase in case of a frequency dependent gain is illustrated very schematically in
The step of checking whether both hearing instruments are functional is preferably repeated regularly. Also, the step of determining whether a further hearing instrument is active can be carried out repeatedly at regular or random time intervals.
Once the temporarily unavailable hearing instrument becomes available again—for example since the battery has been replaced or since the instrument is functional again—this will be detected, and the gain re-set to “binaural” (i.e. to the first gain setting).
As an alternative to the repeated checking of the status of the other hearing instrument (“polling”) a further possibility exists. According to an alternative, a status information of a hearing instrument is transmitted to the other hearing instrument proactively, at regular intervals or on special occasions, such as in case of imminent failure (for example before the battery is empty). Once such a proactively sent status information is received, a status information tag (or the like) in a memory of the receiving hearing instrument may be set to “not active” (referring to the other hearing instrument). The step of determining whether the other hearing instrument is active then includes internally checking the status information tag. The status information tag is re-set to “active”—for example manually or by a status information transmission by the other hearing instrument when it is switched on—when the other hearing instrument is activated again.
The hearing instrument may optionally once or repeatedly produce a signal 15 when the check reveals that the other hearing instrument is not active. The signal may for example be acoustical or may be a warning message displayed on a display field of a remote control (not shown). By the signal, the user may for example be reminded by the still functioning hearing aid to replace the battery of the other hearing instrument.
If the signal is acoustical, preferably the hearing instrument may manually be set to a mode where the signal does not appear so that the user is not disturbed by the signal in situations where he deliberately only uses only one hearing instrument.
A second embodiment of the method according to the invention is shown in
The embodiment of
A process of the kind shown in
A hearing instrument according to the invention comprises means for carrying out any embodiment of the above described method. A hearing instrument system comprises two hearing instruments, shaped and adapted to be placed behind or in the left and right ear of the user, respectively. In the case of wireless communication, the communication interfaces of the two hearing instruments are for example adjusted to each other so that only signals of the corresponding hearing instruments of the hearing instrument system may be detected or that signals of hearing instruments of other hearing instrument systems—for example of hearing instruments worn by other persons nearby—may be distinguished. As an alternative, universal interfaces may be used, so that upon replacement of one hearing instrument no adaptation has to be done.
Various other embodiments may be envisaged without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6415185 | Maltan | Jul 2002 | B1 |
7171272 | Blamey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
20040190734 | Kates | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20060227976 | Csermak et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 941 014 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1 379 102 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1 465 454 | Oct 2004 | EP |
2004110099 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2004114722 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060233385 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |