The present invention generally relates to elevator systems, and more particularly to elevator security systems within elevator systems.
Typical elevator systems work to transport passengers from one floor to another within a building. A passenger call is generated, indicating the floor on which the passenger wishes to be picked up by the elevator, and an elevator responds. The passenger usually indicates a desired destination floor either when the call is generated or upon entering the elevator which responds. The elevator then transports the passenger to the desired destination floor.
Some elevator systems serve buildings in which access to some or all floors of a building is regulated, and authorization is required for persons who wish to access these floors via elevator. When only certain persons are allowed access to these floors, there are a variety of methods used to grant or deny access to certain desired destination floors. Some of these methods include using an identification system in which the elevator recognizes whether the passenger is a person who is authorized to access that particular floor from the elevator. In some systems, an identification card is used or a security code may be entered which allows the passenger access to the regulated floor. In other systems, elevators may transport passengers to all floors, and upon arriving at a regulated floor, the passenger will encounter another type of security system to grant or deny the passenger access. Some systems may even designate certain elevators to only access unregulated floors, and have another set of elevators which can access the regulated floors for authorized passengers.
A method of controlling access to floors within a building via elevator includes receiving a passenger input indicating a desired destination floor that a passenger seeks to travel to in an elevator, accessing a stored database containing data about which floors passengers are allowed to access via elevator when coming from the floor of the passenger input, determining if access is allowed based upon the desired destination floor and the data, and controlling operation of the elevator to deliver the passenger to the desired destination floor if access is allowed.
An embodiment of the present invention relates to an elevator security system. The system includes an elevator for transporting a passenger from one floor to another floor within a building, an input device through which a passenger can input a desired destination floor, and a system for controlling access to floors by the passenger in the elevator. Desired destination floor access is allowed or not allowed based on accessing a stored database containing data about which floors elevators are allowed to access via elevator when coming from the floor of the passenger input.
The present invention provides a method of controlling access to floors within a building via elevator. Typically, when access is regulated to certain floors in an elevator system, security is destination based. Access via elevator to a passenger's desired destination floor is granted or denied based on one or more authorization methods, including passenger recognition, identification cards, and/or entering security codes to be authorized to enter the desired destination. The method of the current invention grants or denies access to a desired destination floor within a building via elevator based on stored data showing which floors a passenger is granted access to based on which floor the passenger is coming from.
Desired destination input devices 30 are connected to group controller 20 through communications lines 22. Input devices 30 can also be wireless (and would then not require communications lines 22). Group controller 20 is connected to car controllers 16a-16c through communications loop 18. Car controller 16a is connected to car 14a, car controller 16b is connected to car 14b, and car controller 16c is connected to car 14c.
Desired destination input devices 30 are located next to the elevators on each floor and are used by passengers to indicate a desired destination floor which the passenger seeks to travel to. Group controller 20 receives and processes this information delivered via communications lines 22. Group controller 20 then provides car controllers 16a-16c with elevator control information based on the destination input information received and data from a stored database (not shown) containing information about which floors passengers are allowed to access via elevator when coming from the floor on which the desired destination input originated. Car controllers 16a-16c control elevators 14a-14c, respectively, based on elevator control information received from group controller 20. If controller 20 determines access is allowed to the desired destination floor when coming from the floor on which the desired destination input originated (based on the stored data), controller 20 will send control information to one of car controllers 16a-16c to control operation of the elevator to transport the passenger to the desired destination floor. If access is not allowed, controller 20 will send information to one of car controllers 16a-16c to control operation of the elevator to not transport the passenger to the desired destination floor (this may include: controlling the elevator to not respond to the call or controlling the elevator to not move between floors and to leave the elevator car doors open on the floor which passenger entered the elevator). While in this embodiment, accessing the stored database and determining if access is granted to the desired destination floor is done by group controller 20, it could be done by a different system, such as a security system, which interfaces with group controller 20.
The desired destination input 30 may be a device which the passenger enters the desired destination floor into or it may simply be conventional up and down hall call buttons, which the passenger uses to signal the direction of the desired destination floor. If the desired destination input is conventional up and down hall call buttons, the determination of whether access is granted to a desired destination floor will be made when the passenger enters an elevator and presses a button to indicate a desired destination floor.
In the invention of the second embodiment, after a passenger input indicating a desired destination floor has been received, a stored database is accessed to determine whether the passenger is allowed to access the desired destination floor via elevator. This stored database contains data relating to two pieces of information: whether an elevator can transport passengers from the floor on which the input originated to the desired destination floor and whether a particular passenger is authorized to access the desired destination floor. The information can also be stored in separate databases. This information is illustrated in
By accessing this stored database, the elevator system controls access to desired destination floors based on the floor on which the call originated (as well as authorization). This can be useful in a number of applications relating to security and different access levels, including a bank, a hospital, an office building, a multi-function building and a university building.
When a passenger input indicating a desired destination floor to which a passenger seeks to travel via elevator is received, this data matrix (stored in a database) is accessed. The matrix is used to determine if access to the desired destination floor is allowed. The floor on which the passenger input originated is located on the vertical “From” side of the matrix. The desired destination floor is located on the horizontal “To” side of the matrix. The square in which the “From” floor crosses paths with the “To” floor in the matrix, determines if access is granted to the desired destination floor from the input origination floor via elevator. If the square contains an “O” access is allowed, and the elevator is controlled to transport the passenger from the input origination floor to the desired destination floor. If the square contains “N,” access is not granted and the elevator is controlled to not transport the passenger from the input origination floor to the desired destination floor. If the square contains an “AA,” proper authorization must be accepted before elevator is controlled to transport passenger from the input origination floor to the desired destination floor.
The determination of whether access to a floor via elevator is granted (done by accessing data in the stored database) can be performed directly by the elevator controller. It could also be performed by another system, such as a security system, which interfaces with the elevator controller. The data stored in the database is able to be modified, enabling the system to easily adapt to different needs of a particular building concerning granting access to different floors based on the origination floor.
As can be seen in the matrix, when a person is desiring to travel from F2, the clean floor, to F4, the surgery floor, the matrix would show an “AA.” This means that the person is allowed to travel from F2 to F4 if they have the proper authorization. Travel (with the proper authorization) from F2 to F4 is allowed, as the clean floor has sterile materials and only sterile materials are allowed on surgery floor F4. However, a person desiring to travel from F2 to F6, the dirty floor, would encounter an “N” in the matrix. This means that travel from F2 to F6 is not allowed. This is to keep the sterile materials on F2 from going to F6 and possibly becoming contaminated. Conversely, a passenger would not be able to travel to clean floor F2 or surgery floor F4 from dirty floor F6. This is to prevent contamination of clean floor F2 and surgery floor F4 from the contaminants on dirty floor F6. Travel via elevator from surgery floor F4 to F2 is also allowed if authorized.
As can be seen in the matrix, executive “E” is able to travel via elevator from the garage F1 or the lobby F2 only to security floor F3 (or between garage F1 and lobby F2, as these moves contain an “O”). Executive E is not able to travel directly to her office on floor F20 from the garage F1 or lobby F2, because although she has authorization to enter F20 travel via elevator from garage F1 or lobby F2 to F20 is not allowed (N). She must first go through security on floor F3, and then may travel to her office on floor F20. This enables a more secure office, first making persons entering the building (through the lobby or garage) check in with security before proceeding to other floors.
B1 on F2-F5 grants access to any of F2-F5 when the input originates from lobby F1, fitness center on F10, hotel lobby on F11 or restaurant on F20. B1 could represent a retail business of some sort which would allow open access to all desiring to come to B1.
B2 on F6-F9 is a more secure business. Access to B2 via elevator (from a floor not within B2) is allowed only when coming from the lobby to F6. F6 may contain some kind of reception desk or security to ensure only those who work at B2 are allowed to access the other floors of B2 (F7-F9). However, when the passenger input originates from a floor already within B2, open access is allowed to any other floor within B2 (F6-F9).
F10 holds a fitness center which is open to public membership. Therefore, access is open to F10 when the passenger call originates on any other floor. The hotel lobby on F11, and the restaurant on F20 is much the same, allowing access to these floors via elevator from any other floor.
The hotel on F11-F19 includes the hotel lobby on F11, guest rooms on F12-F18 and the hotel pool on F19. Guests must first enter the hotel at the hotel lobby on F11, as access to all other hotel floors is not allowed when coming from any floor not in the hotel (F1-F10 and F20). Once in the hotel lobby, access to the hotel pool via elevators is open. Access to floors containing guest rooms (F12-F18) requires some sort of authorization, indicating the guest is staying at a room on that floor.
This embodiment demonstrates how the elevator system of the present invention can efficiently and effectively service a multi-function building by controlling access to floors within that building via elevators. The system controls access to different floors in a building by accessing stored data to determine which floors passengers are allowed to access when coming from the floor on which the passenger input originated. The data matrix is easily modifiable as the needs of the building and building tenants change. The system of the current invention can also serve to eliminate the need to install multiple sets of elevators, where each business has its own set of elevators for security reasons.
As can be seen in the matrix, coming from the lobby via elevator, access is open to the lecture halls (F2-F3), lab (F4) and first floor of the library (F8). These are all destinations likely frequented by students, and therefore need to be easily accessible to them via elevator. To access faculty offices (F5-F7) from any other floors (F1-F4 and F8), authorization is required. This ensures that only those with proper authorization are allowed to travel to F5-F7 from any other floor, but also allows faculty (or others) already on F5-F7 to easily travel via elevator between F5-F7 without the need for showing authorization every time.
Because libraries are concerned with the security of books, there is frequently one entrance and exit to a library so that anyone leaving with a book properly checks out that book. This system allows for a secure library entrance and exit on F8. Access to travel to F8 (the library entrance) via elevator is open when coming from any floor. To travel to the other floors of the library, one must first stop at F8. Access to travel directly to F9 or F10 is not allowed. Once on F8, access to F9 and F10 is open. When desiring to exit the library, persons must first travel to F8, presumably exit the secure library exit (checking out any books), and then those persons are allowed access to other floors via elevators. Access to any floor below F8 when entering the elevator on F9 or F10 is not allowed.
This system allows for an origination floor based method to control access to floors within a university building via elevators. University buildings tend to have unique needs for elevator systems, as they must efficiently handle a large number of persons and provide access to an ever-changing student body to certain areas while keeping other areas secure. This origination floor based method of controlling access to floors facilitates allowing access via elevators to areas which students frequent without having to grant access individually to each student in the always-changing student body. This system also provides a simple solution for the unique security needs of individual areas such as faculty offices and the library.
These examples above (a bank building, a hospital, an office building, a multi-function building, and a university building) show different embodiments of the method of controlling access to floors within a building via elevator, as well as the elevator security system of the current invention. The system of the current invention (which grants access to certain floors via elevator based on stored data and the floor which a passenger is coming from) could be useful in many other situations, including in a stadium where athletes and team personnel are granted different levels of access and come from different origination floors than fans, and in a church where the congregation and different church personnel would be granted access to different areas based on where the passenger input originated. The ability to easily modify the stored data (which is accessed to determine whether access is granted to a desired destination floor) means that the current invention allows more flexibility in building use. A building that was once used for low security offices, could be turned into a multi-purpose building, even housing higher-security tenants without the need to add additional elevators or security systems to accommodate the higher-security tenants.
While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/067899 | 12/14/2009 | WO | 00 | 5/17/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/075115 | 6/23/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4979594 | Begle et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5200583 | Kupersmith et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5689094 | Friedli et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5749443 | Romao | May 1998 | A |
6062346 | Friedli et al. | May 2000 | A |
6315083 | Schuster et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6707374 | Zaharia | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6772862 | Friedli | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7025180 | Wyss et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7190256 | Pieper | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7581622 | Amano | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7936249 | Friedli | May 2011 | B2 |
8061485 | Finschi | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8464840 | Flynn et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8770350 | Wilke et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20120228065 | Tokura | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120228066 | Mitsuda et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130048435 | Finschi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130068569 | Nakashima | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140054116 | Wu | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1715166 | Jan 2006 | CN |
101287666 | Oct 2008 | CN |
0699617 | Mar 1996 | EP |
1666398 | Jun 2006 | EP |
H07237837 | Sep 1995 | JP |
2004123330 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2006-096505 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2006096505 | Apr 2006 | JP |
2007084179 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2008050066 | Mar 2008 | JP |
20-0417893 | Jun 2006 | KR |
10-20060081041 | Jul 2006 | KR |
10-0643125 | Nov 2006 | KR |
2007014477 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007036057 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2006059983 | Jun 2008 | WO |
2011075115 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Article by Paul Friedli and Kilian Schuster entitled The Evolution of the Passenger Interface with the Elevator:, TUE, vol. 37 (1996), No. 10 (October), pp. 17-20. |
Article by Dr-lng-Joris Schroder entitled “Advanced Dispatching”, Schindler Management AG, Ebikon/Lucerne, Switzerland. |
International Search Report, mailed Aug. 10, 2010. |
English Translation of Japanese Office Action, mailed Dec. 3, 2013. |
Canadian Office Action, dated Oct. 17, 2013. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal from KR Patent Application Serial No. 10-2012-7016481, dated Jul. 31, 2013, 10 pages. |
Translation of Chinese Office Action for application CN200980162887.1, mailed Dec. 13, 2013, 9 pages. |
Translation of Chinese Search Report for application CN2009801629887.1, Dec. 3, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120241259 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |