This disclosure relates to controlling an internal combustion system through MAP and estimated MAF control.
When controlling an internal combustion engine, an accurate air flow and/or pressure of air going into the engine is determined to accurately calculate the fuel needed for a target air-fuel ratio (AFR). In some instances, engines are designed to run with an AFR being at a stoichiometric AFR, a lean AFR (excess air), or rich AFR (excess fuel). Common ways to determine such air flow and/or pressure include using a mass airflow sensor (MAF), a manifold absolute pressure sensor (MAP), or a combination of the two. Accurately adding fuel to achieve a target AFR is useful for reducing NOx emissions.
This disclosure describes technologies relating to controlling an internal combustion system.
An example implementation of the subject matter described within this disclosure is a method of controlling an internal combustion engine system. The method includes the following features. A first pressure upstream of a throttle is received. A temperature upstream of the throttle is received. A second pressure within an intake manifold is received. An engine speed is received. An air flow is estimated based on the received first pressure, the received temperature, the received second pressure, and the received engine speed. Estimating the air flow includes determining one or more models to use for calculating air flow based on the received first pressure and the received second pressure. The models include a throttle flow model, a port flow model, or both.
An aspect of the example method, which can be combined with example method alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. Determining the one or more models includes determining a pressure drop across the throttle using the received first pressure and the received second pressure. The pressure drop across the throttle is determined to be greater than a specified threshold. an air flow is calculated based on the throttle flow model using the received first pressure, the received temperature, and the received second pressure.
An aspect of the example method, which can be combined with example method alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. Determining the one or more models includes determining a pressure drop across the throttle using the received first pressure and the received second pressure. The pressure drop across the throttle is determined to be less than a specified threshold. An air flow based on the port flow model is calculated using the received second pressure, the received temperature, the received engine speed, and a volumetric efficiency table.
An aspect of the example method, which can be combined with example method alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. Determining the one or more models includes determining a ratio of a throttle flow model to a port flow model based in part on a pressure drop across the throttle.
An aspect of the example method, which can be combined with example method alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. Determining the ratio includes determining that the pressure drop across the throttle is greater than a first specified threshold and determining that the pressure drop across the throttle is less than a second specified threshold. The second specified threshold is greater than the first specified threshold.
An aspect of the example method, which can be combined with example method alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. Estimating the air flow includes calculating an air flow based on the throttle flow model using the received first pressure, the received temperature, and the received second pressure. An air flow is calculate based on the port flow model using the received second pressure, the received temperature, the received engine speed, and a volumetric efficiency table. the calculated air flows of the throttle flow model and the port flow model are blended based on the determined ratio. An estimated air flow is determined based on the blended calculated air flows.
An aspect of the example method, which can be combined with example method alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. An amount of fuel is admitted into an intake fluid stream. The amount of fuel is based on the estimated air flow and a target air-fuel ratio.
An example of the subject matter within this disclosure is an engine system with the following features. An intake manifold is configured to receive a combustible mixture configured to be combusted within a combustion chamber. A throttle is upstream of the intake manifold. The throttle is configured to at least partially regulate an air flow into the intake manifold. A controller configured to receive a first pressure stream from a first pressure sensor at a first pressure port. The first pressure stream corresponds to a first pressure upstream of a throttle. The controller is configured to receive a temperature stream from a temperature sensor at the first pressure port. The temperature stream corresponds to a temperature upstream of the throttle. The controller is configured to receive an engine speed stream from an engine speed sensor. The engine speed stream corresponds to an engine speed. The controller is configured to receive a second pressure stream from a second pressure sensor at a second pressure port. The second pressure stream corresponds to a second pressure within the intake manifold. The controller is configured to estimate an air flow based on the first pressure stream, the temperature stream, the engine speed stream, and the second pressure stream.
An aspect of the example engine system, which can be combined with example engine system alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. The controller is further configured to estimate the air flow with the following steps. A blending ratio of a throttle flow model to a port flow model is determined by the controller based on a pressure drop across the throttle. An air flow is calculated by the controller based on the throttle flow model using the first pressure stream, the temperature stream, and the second pressure stream. An air flow is calculated by the controller based on the port flow model using the second pressure stream, the temperature stream, an engine speed stream, and a volumetric efficiency table. The calculated air flows of the throttle flow model and port flow model are blended by the controller based on the determined blending ratio. An estimated airflow is determined by the controller based on the blended calculated air flows.
An aspect of the example engine system, which can be combined with example engine system alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. The controller is further configured to determine the blending ratio with the following steps. The pressure drop across the throttle is determined by the controller to be greater than a first specified threshold. The pressure drop across the throttle is determined by the controller to be less than a second specified threshold. The second specified threshold is greater than the first specified threshold.
An aspect of the example engine system, which can be combined with example engine system alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. The controller is further configured to send a signal to a fuel source. The signal corresponds to an amount of fuel to inject into an intake fluid stream. The amount of fuel is at least partially based on the estimated air flow and a target air-fuel ratio.
An example implementation of the subject matter described within this disclosure is an engine system controller configured to perform the following steps. A first pressure stream, corresponding to a first pressure upstream of a throttle, is received by the controller. A temperature stream, corresponding to a temperature upstream of the throttle, is received by the controller. An engine speed stream from an engine speed sensor is received by the controller. The engine speed stream corresponds to an engine speed. A second pressure stream, corresponding to a second pressure within an intake manifold, is received by the controller. One or more models to use for calculating air flow is determined by the controller based on the received first pressure and the received second pressure. The models include a throttle flow model, a port flow model, or both. An air flow is estimated by the controller based on the one or more determined models.
An aspect of the example engine system controller, which can be combined with example engine system controller alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. Determining the one or more models to use for calculating air flow includes the controller being further configured to determine a pressure drop across the throttle using the received first pressure and the received second pressure. The controller is further configured to determine if the pressure drop across the throttle is greater than a specified threshold, and if so, calculate an air flow based on the throttle flow model using the received first pressure, the received temperature, and the received second pressure.
An aspect of the example engine system controller, which can be combined with example engine system controller alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. Determining the one or more models to use for calculating air flow includes the controller being further configured to determine a pressure drop across the throttle using the received first pressure and the received second pressure. The controller is further configured to determine the if pressure drop across the throttle is less than a specified threshold, and, if so, calculate an air flow based on the port flow model using the received second pressure, the received temperature, the received engine speed, and a volumetric efficiency table.
An aspect of the example engine system controller, which can be combined with example engine system controller alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. Determining the one or more models to use for calculating air flow includes the controller being further configured to determine a blending ratio of a throttle flow model to a port flow model based on a pressure drop across the throttle. The controller if further configured to calculate an air flow based on a throttle flow model using the first pressure stream, the temperature stream, and the second pressure stream. The controller is further configured to calculate an air flow based on the port flow model using the second pressure stream, the temperature stream, an engine speed stream, and a volumetric efficiency table. The controller is further configured to blend the calculated air flows of the throttle flow model and the port flow model based on the determined ratio. The controller is further configured to determine an estimated airflow based on the blended calculated air flows.
An aspect of the example engine system controller, which can be combined with example engine system controller alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. The controller is further configured to determine the blending ratio with the following steps. The pressure drop across the throttle is determined by the controller to be greater than a first specified threshold. the pressure drop across the throttle is determined by the controller to be less than a second specified threshold. The second specified threshold is greater than the first specified threshold.
An aspect of the example engine system controller, which can be combined with example engine system controller alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. The controller is further configured to send a signal to a fuel source. The signal corresponds to an amount of fuel to inject into an intake fluid stream. The amount of fuel is based on the estimated air flow and a target air-fuel ratio.
An aspect of the example engine system controller, which can be combined with example engine system controller alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. The controller is further configured to calculate a differential pressure across the throttle based on the first pressure stream and the second pressure stream.
An aspect of the example engine system controller, which can be combined with example engine system controller alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. The throttle flow model estimates air flow through the throttle based on the first pressure stream, the temperature stream, and the second pressure stream.
An aspect of the example engine system controller, which can be combined with example engine system controller alone or in combination with other aspects, includes the following. The port flow model estimates air flow through ports between the intake manifold and a combustion chamber defined by an engine block and an engine head. The air flow is estimated based on the engine speed stream, the second pressure stream, and a volumetric efficiency table.
The details of one or more implementations of the subject matter are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the subject matter will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
During transient engine operation, it is difficult to accurately control the air-fuel ratio (AFR) that is going into the engine. Controlling the engine's AFR affects engine performance and emissions during all operating conditions. For example, in a typical solution, the throttle flow is estimated with engine port flow by using the standard speed-density equation with a transient compensation table. Such a method does not utilize the correct physical models, which results in higher associated engineering cost and a solution that is not as robust to transient conditions. The method of finding throttle flow by using isentropic flow (e.g., with orifice mass flow equation or an elliptical approximation of this equation) is also sometimes used; however, this solution is known to be less accurate when the delta pressure (dP) across the air intake throttle valve is low. In some instances, such issues are caused by pressure sensor inaccuracies. Alternatively or in addition, such an isentropic flow model can result in inaccuracies when the throttle valve is operated near the closed position (e.g., when the throttle is in the closed to 10% open range). In some instances, such issues are caused by a large change of effective area for a small change in position combined with position sensor inaccuracies, part-to-part variations and leakage paths when the valve is near a closed position, pressure sensor inaccuracies, or any combination of these discrepancies.
This disclosure relates to controlling an internal combustion engine system. A pressure and temperate are detected upstream of a throttle valve. In addition, an engine speed and a manifold pressure are detected. Based on these measurements, an estimated pressure drop across the throttle, in certain instances, is calculated using a throttle model specific to the throttle. Downstream of the throttle is an intake manifold of the engine. A pressure within the intake manifold is measured by the manifold absolute pressure (MAP) sensor. Based on the pressure and temperature detected upstream of the throttle valve, the detected MAP, and an engine speed, an air flow can be estimated with great accuracy, including during transient conditions. This is done by determining one or more models to use for calculating air flow based on the throttle position. The selected models, in certain instances, include a throttle flow model, a port flow model, or both. In instances where both models are used, they are weighted based on the pressure differential between the first pressure and the second pressure. In some instances, a compensation table or equation is used to correct for any errors.
A throttle valve 112 is positioned upstream of the intake manifold 104. The throttle 112 is configured to regulate air flow into the intake manifold 104 from the ambient environment 116, for example, by changing a cross-sectional area of a flow passage going through the throttle 112. While illustrated as a single throttle valve 112, some implementations may include multiple throttle valves, for example, one throttle valve for each cylinder bank or one throttle valve for each cylinder. In some implementations, the throttle 112 includes a butterfly valve or a disc valve. Reducing the cross-sectional area of the flow passage through the throttle 112 reduces the flowrate of air flowing through the throttle 112 towards the intake manifold 104. A combination temperature and pressure sensor 132 is positioned just upstream of the throttle 112. This combination temperature and pressure sensor 132 detects the pressure and temperature of the air flow upstream of the throttle 112 and produces a temperature stream and a pressure stream corresponding to the respective detected pressure and temperature stream. A stream in the context of this disclosure is an analog, pneumatic, hydraulic, or digital signal that can be received and interpreted by an engine system controller 130. While primarily described throughout this disclosure as a combined sensor, separate, discrete sensors, in some implementations, are used in lieu of the combination temperature and pressure sensor 132. An engine speed sensor 134 is configured to detect a rotational speed of the engine's crank shaft and produces an engine speed stream corresponding to the detected engine speed. Such a sensor can include a Hall Effect sensor, dynamometer, an optical sensor, or any other sensor adequate for the service.
An exhaust manifold 106 is typically coupled to the engine head and is configured to receive combustion products (exhaust) from a combustion chamber defined by the engine block and engine head. That is, the exhaust manifold 106 is fluidically coupled to an outlet of the combustion chamber. In some implementations, the engine system 100 includes a compressor 118 upstream of the throttle 112. In an engine with a compressor 118 but no throttle 112, such as an unthrottled diesel engine, the throttle 112 is not needed. In some implementations, the compressor 118 includes a centrifugal compressor, a positive displacement compressor, or another type of compressor for increasing a pressure within the intake manifold 104 during engine operation. In some implementations, the engine system 100 includes an intercooler 120 that is configured to cool the compressed air prior to the air entering the intake manifold 104. In the illustrated implementation, the compressor 118 is part of a turbocharger. That is, a turbine 122 is located downstream of the exhaust manifold 106 and rotates as the exhaust gas expands through the turbine 122. The turbine 122 is coupled to the compressor 118, for example, via a shaft 124 and imparts rotation on the compressor 118. While the illustrated implementation utilizes a turbocharger to increase the intake manifold pressure, other methods of compression, in certain instances, are used, for example an electric or engine powered compressor (e.g., supercharger). Alternatively, engine systems lacking forced induction are also within the scope of this disclosure. In some implementations, additional components and subsystems can be included, for example, an exhaust gas recirculation subsystem and associated components. In some implementations, a separate controller 130 or engine control unit (ECU) is used to control and detect various aspects of the system operation. For example, the controller 130 can adjust air-fuel ratios, spark timing, and EGR flow rates based on current operating conditions and parameters sensed by various sensors.
A second pressure port 352 is positioned within the intake manifold 204. The second pressure port 352 provides a location for the MAP sensor 136 to sense a pressure within the intake manifold 204, which is downstream of the throttle 112, by allowing fluid communication between the interior flow passage 202 and the MAP sensor 136. Based on information, or streams, provided by sensors 132 and 136, an estimated pressure drop across the throttle 112 can be determined. In instances where the pressure drop is above a certain threshold (e.g., when the throttle is in the closed to 10% open range), a detailed model of air flow through the throttle 112 can be used to determine an estimated mass air flow (MAF) based on the calculated pressure drop and the temperature stream.
In instances where the pressure drop is below a certain threshold, a port flow model utilizing a volumetric efficiency table and the speed density equation is used in lieu of or in addition to MAF calculation. A port flow model attempts to calculate a flow into the cylinders through ports in the intake manifold. The speed density equation uses engine speed and MAP to calculate airflow requirements by referring to a preprogrammed lookup table that includes values that equates to the engine's volumetric efficiency under varying conditions of throttle position and engine speed. Since air density changes with air temperature, an intake manifold-mounted sensor is also used. An operational example of such an instance includes when the throttle 112 is in the open or nearly opened position (e.g., when the throttle is in the open to 60% open range).
Fuel injectors 206 are located at an intake port of each cylinder. As illustrated, there are six ports for the intake manifold 204 that are meant to feed six cylinders. In some implementations, greater of fewer ports and cylinders are used, for example, four cylinders and four ports, or 8 cylinders and 8 ports can be used without departing from this disclosure. While the fuel injectors 206 are illustrated as arranged in a port injection arrangement, other injection arrangements or fuel sources can be used to admit fuel without departing from this disclosure. For example, in some implementations, a single point injection, a gas mixer, or a direct injection arrangement is used.
In addition to the MAF or speed equation calculations previously described, in certain implementations, an air-fuel-exhaust mass flow rate is determined by comparing the pressure sensed by additional pressure sensors. A difference between the mass air-flow rate and the air-fuel-exhaust flow rate, in some instances, is used to calculate an EGR mass flow rate. In certain instances, such a calculation, in some instances, is performed by the controller 130 (
To determine which model to use for calculating mass air flow, the controller 130 determines a ratio of a throttle flow model to a port flow model based on the throttle position stream. For example, if the throttle 112 is in a closed or near-closed position, then the throttle flow model will be more heavily weighted than the port flow model. In other words, when the controller 130 determines that the pressure drop across the throttle 112 is greater than a specified threshold, then the throttle flow model is used. Conversely, if the throttle 112 is in an open or near-open position, then the port nozzle flow model will be more heavily weighted than the throttle flow model. In other words, if the pressure drop across the throttle 112 is below a second specified threshold that is lower than the first threshold, then the port flow model is used. If the pressure drop across the throttle 112 is between the first threshold and the second threshold, then a blend of the two models is used. Based on the throttle flow model, the air flow is calculated using the first pressure stream, the temperature stream, and the second pressure stream. In other words, a differential pressure across the throttle 112 is calculated by the controller 130 based on the first pressure stream, the temperature stream, and the second pressure stream. Based on the port flow model, the air flow is calculated using the second pressure stream, the temperature stream, the engine speed stream, and a volumetric efficiency table. Once the controller 130 has calculated the airflow based on both of the flow models, the controller 130 blends the calculated air flows of both the throttle flow model and the port flow model based on the determined blending ratio. The controller 130 then determines an estimated airflow based on the blended calculated air flows.
In certain instances, the controller 130 can control many aspects of the internal combustion engine system 100 (
While this disclosure contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular implementations of particular subject matters. Certain features that are described in this disclosure in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or variation of a subcombination.
Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the implementations described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single product or packaged into multiple products.
A number of implementations of the subject matter have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2354179 | Blanc | Jul 1944 | A |
3680534 | Chavant | Aug 1972 | A |
4069797 | Nohira et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4174027 | Nakazumi | Nov 1979 | A |
4183333 | Aoyama | Jan 1980 | A |
4203400 | Yorioka | May 1980 | A |
4249503 | Noguchi et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4271795 | Nakagawa et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
5611203 | Henderson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611204 | Radovanovic et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5974802 | Blake | Nov 1999 | A |
6003316 | Baert et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6216458 | Alger et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6267106 | Feucht | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6343594 | Koeslin et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6408833 | Faletti | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425382 | Marthaler et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6470864 | Kim et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6609373 | Coleman et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6609374 | Feucht et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6640542 | Coleman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6659092 | Coleman et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6729133 | Sorter et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732524 | Sponton | May 2004 | B2 |
6776146 | Ricart-Ugaz et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6810725 | Henderson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6880535 | Sorter et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886544 | Bui | May 2005 | B1 |
6983645 | Webb et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7032578 | Liu et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040305 | Sponton | May 2006 | B2 |
7140874 | Ingalls, Jr. et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7175422 | Webb et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178492 | Coleman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191743 | Weber et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7212926 | Ingalls, Jr. et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7252077 | Berggren | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7261096 | Berggren et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7277801 | Webb et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7281530 | Usei | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7299137 | Bartley et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7311090 | Lyons | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7322193 | Bering et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7347086 | Webb et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7389770 | Bertilsson et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7412335 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7426923 | Berggren | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7550126 | Webb et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7552722 | Shieh | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7578179 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7597016 | Timmons et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7669411 | Mallampalli et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712314 | Barnes et al. | May 2010 | B1 |
7748976 | Burrahm et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7833301 | Schindler et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854118 | Vetrovec | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7886727 | Ulrey | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7934492 | Gerum | May 2011 | B2 |
8047185 | Ulrey et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8056340 | Vaught et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8061120 | Hwang | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8425224 | Webb et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8589053 | Keiner | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8821349 | Cunningham et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9051900 | Regner | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9074540 | Subramanian | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9228519 | Hagari | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9239034 | Cunningham et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9303557 | Ulrey et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9309837 | Ulrey et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9448091 | Woodsend | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9488098 | Sponsky | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9546591 | Ge | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9651004 | Zhang | May 2017 | B2 |
9695785 | Roth et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9759150 | Ohori | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9816466 | Roth et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9863371 | El Gammal et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10036353 | Shuto et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10316803 | Hampson | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10465637 | Beyer | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10634099 | Hampson | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10731580 | Surnilla | Aug 2020 | B2 |
20030111065 | Blum | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040173192 | Sorter et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050247284 | Weber et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060021346 | Whelan et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060124116 | Bui | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168958 | Vetrovec | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070039321 | Sheidler | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20100300413 | Ulrey et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110265772 | Teng | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120180478 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197550 | Cianflone | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130276766 | Rajkumar | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130319381 | Piaz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140224232 | Hotta | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140238364 | Beyer et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150047317 | Ulrey et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150047618 | Ulrey et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150059713 | Forshier | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150083085 | Ravenhill et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150267650 | Siuchta et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150285192 | Roth et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150369126 | Knopfel et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160319778 | Shuto et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170022941 | Mallard | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170030305 | Sugiyama | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170058839 | El Gammal et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170306899 | Sanami | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20190093604 | Hampson | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190257274 | Hampson | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20200256266 | Mastbergen | Aug 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202125377 | Jan 2012 | CN |
103306858 | Sep 2013 | CN |
103397959 | Nov 2013 | CN |
203335295 | Dec 2013 | CN |
203499859 | Mar 2014 | CN |
204386776 | Jun 2015 | CN |
207920739 | Sep 2018 | CN |
181618 | Mar 1907 | DE |
19587578 | Jun 1999 | DE |
10054264 | May 2002 | DE |
0653559 | May 1995 | EP |
0732490 | Sep 1996 | EP |
1020632 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1859128 | Jul 2008 | EP |
2562397 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2902466 | Dec 2007 | FR |
2893988 | Jan 2008 | FR |
2313623 | Dec 1997 | GB |
2356223 | May 2001 | GB |
2421543 | Jun 2006 | GB |
2438360 | Nov 2007 | GB |
H 09195860 | Jul 1997 | JP |
H 10131742 | May 1998 | JP |
H 11324812 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000097111 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000230460 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2002221103 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2004100508 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005147010 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005147011 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005147030 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005147049 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2006132373 | May 2006 | JP |
2007092592 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2009299591 | Dec 2009 | JP |
2010101191 | May 2010 | JP |
2013087720 | May 2013 | JP |
2013113097 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2013170539 | Sep 2013 | JP |
5530267 | Jun 2014 | JP |
5916335 | May 2016 | JP |
5935975 | Jun 2016 | JP |
5938974 | Jun 2016 | JP |
6035987 | Nov 2016 | JP |
6051881 | Dec 2016 | JP |
WO2015069330 | May 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chinese Office Action in CN Appln. No. 201721556484.3, dated May 14, 2018, 3 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2018/052637, dated Dec. 21, 2018, 6 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2020/017155, dated May 27, 2020, 14 pages. |