1. Field of the Invention
This invention resides in the field of systems and methods for the analysis of exhaled breath.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Analyses of exhaled breath from human subjects are of value in many applications, including the diagnosis and management of several physiological conditions. A change in the nitric oxide (NO) concentration in the exhaled breath of a person suffering from asthma, for example, can indicate a change in the level of inflammation in the airway of the person, which in turn can indicate an increase in the likelihood of an asthma attack. Another component of exhaled breath whose concentration can be correlated with a physiological abnormality is carbon monoxide, a rise in which can be an early indication of the onset of hemolytic jaundice. A still further example is hydrogen, whose rise can indicate malabsorption of carbohydrate. These gases are typically present in trace amounts, notably at concentrations in the parts per billion (ppb) range, and concentration changes that are still within trace amounts can indicate abnormalities before they can be detected at the parts per million range.
The utility and reliability of an analyzer for exhaled breath are limited by fluctuations in temperature, humidity, and breath flow, any of which can interfere with and influence the analytical result. Interference due to these factors is especially acute when the analyzer is used for measuring trace amounts of the analyte. Thus, any device that seeks to quantify analytes in trace amounts in exhaled breath must minimize the effect of these factors or compensate for their presence.
Among these factors, the one that is the most difficult to control in most cases is the flow rate of the exhaled breath of the subject through the analytical device. A crude method in the prior art for controlling the breath flow rate is a verbal instruction from the clinician performing the analysis to the subject, calling for the subject to breathe out faster or slower to correct deviations from the design rate for the analyzer. This method is limited by the subject's ability to adjust the flow rate, particularly when the subject is a child, and is generally impractical for trace gas analyses over a wide range of concentration. An alternative is to include a variable flow resistance in the analyzer and altering the resistance to correct for the deviations. A device that incorporates this capability is disclosed in Moilanen, E., et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,733,463 B1, issued May 11, 2004. The device in the Moilanen et al. patent contains a mechanical, electrically controlled throttle that is controlled by a signal from a mass flow meter inside the device. Unfortunately, the Moilanen et al. device is complex, requiring multiple components under feedback control.
The present invention resides in apparatus for exhaled breath analysis that includes a housing constructed to receive exhaled breath directly from a subject, a flow-through passage within the housing for the travel of the exhaled breath, an analyte sensing element in the flow-through passage, and a pump or pump system to control the rate at which the subject exhales into the housing and to cause the exhaled breath to flow through the passage at a controlled rate. The invention can be used for the analysis of a variety of gaseous analytes, including those in trace amounts, and is of particular interest the quantification of NO.
While the invention is susceptible to a variety of constructions, the features defining the invention and its novelty are best understood by a detailed review of specific embodiments. Three such embodiments are shown in the Figures and described below.
An optional component in the flow path of the breath through the device is a flow resistor 14 which in this embodiment is positioned downstream of the pressure sensor 12 and upstream of the pump 13. In certain embodiments of the invention, a second flow resistor 15 is included in the flow path as well, downstream of the first resistor 14 but still upstream of the pump 13. The flow resistor or resistors will assist in limiting the flow to a desired flow rate, which may for example be 50 cm3/s, and in increasing the pressure in the user's mouth, throat, or air passages. One example of a flow resistor is a fixed orifice in the form of a round aperture having a diameter of approximately 0.11 cm. Flow resistors of other types will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art and can be used in place of an orifice. Flow resistors can serve to tune the system to the specifications of the pump 13.
The first resistor offers a resistance which will be designated herein by the symbol Ri. The flow path downstream of the first resistor 14 in this embodiment is divided into two streams—a main stream 16 and a side stream 17. These streams will also be referred to herein as a primary stream and a secondary stream, respectively. The second resistor 15 resides in the main stream 16 and offers a resistance which will be designated here by the symbol Rp, which can be variable or fixed. Examples of variable resistors are motor-controlled needle valves, solenoid-controlled needle valves, manual needle valves, and pinch-tube valves, all of which also offer resistance to the flow. An example of a fixed resistor is a non-variable orifice. Included in the side stream 17 is a side stream valve 18, which is preferably a shut-off, i.e., open/close, valve and a resistor 19 to allow flow into or prevent flow from entering the side stream, and to thereby control the flow distribution between the two streams. An example of a shut-off valve suitable for this application is a solenoid valve; other examples will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. After a selected period of time from the start of the exhale, the side stream valve 18 can be opened to allow breath flow to occur in parallel through the main and side streams. The valve may for example be set to open at 7 seconds after the start of exhalation flow into the device, and to remain open until 10 seconds after the start of exhalation flow. Under this protocol, all exhaled breath will pass through the main stream 16 for the first seven seconds of the test, then through both the main and side streams 16, 17 for the next three seconds.
The side stream 17 contains an analyte sensor 21 that detects the level of the analyte (NO or otherwise) in the exhaled breath passing through the side stream. The analyte sensor 21 may also offer flow resistance and eliminate the need for a separate side stream resistor 19. In the representation of such an embodiment in
A constant flow rate of exhaled breath through the device 10 can be maintained in any of several ways. One way is to use a main stream resistor 15 whose resistance Rp is variable while the side stream resistor 19 has a non-variable resistance Rs. The main stream resistor may have a value of Rp1 when the side stream valve 18 is closed, and be programmed or set to change to a value of Rp2 when the side stream valve 18 is open. The values of Rp1 and Rp2 can be chosen so that the sum of the flow rates through the main stream 16 and the side stream 17 when the side stream valve 18 is open will equal the flow rate through the main stream 16 when the side stream valve 18 is closed. The choice of resistance levels for Rp1 and Rp2 may be influenced in part by the resistance from other components in the flow stream, such as the other resistors, valves, and sensors, as well as the voltage and capacity of the pump.
In the embodiment shown in
One example of a set of values for the pump pressure drop, the flow rate through the device as a whole, and the various resistances for a flow rate of 50 cm3/s through the device is listed in Table I below. In this example, the resistance in the main stream Rp is variable while the remaining resistances Ri and Rs are constant. The symbols used in Table I and the succeeding tables are as follows:
In the example above, the two values of Rp (Rp1 and Rp2) are chosen to maintain a constant flow rate of 50 cm3/s throughout the test, with a flow rate of 8 cm3/s through the analyte sensor 21, i.e., a main stream to side stream flow ratio of 42:8, when the side stream valve is open. To achieve this flow ratio, the ratio of Rp2 to Rs will be 8/42=0.29, and to assure that the same flow rate will occur when the side stream valve is closed, the ratio of Rp1 to Rp2 is 42/50=0.84. Thus, when the side stream 17 is open during the final three seconds of exhalation, breath will flow through the side stream at a rate of 8 cm3/s, while the remainder will flow at 42 cm3/s through the main stream 16.
In a second example, the resistance from all resistors remains constant while the pump flow rate is varied. This configuration utilizes a variation in the pressure drop across the pump to compensate for the change in the overall flow path resistance that occurs when the side stream is opened. The ratio of the resistance Rp at the main resistor 15 and the resistance Rs at the side stream resistor 19 is again 8/42=0.29, as in Example 1.
As in the single-pump embodiment of
The use of a side stream as shown in each of the Figures herein (element 17 of
With the inclusion of the side stream shut-off valve, a separate side stream pump, or both, the side stream allows the system to be operated in a mode that can be termed a “stopped-flow operation.” Stopping the flow allows the system to create a stable testing environment that can be maintained for a much longer period than is possible in a flowing system. As noted above, a one-minute static exposure time is illustrative, although much longer or shorter exposure times can be used as well.
The system and configurations described herein can be used for the analysis of many different analytes in exhaled breath, including gases that are present only in trace quantities, such as NO. For purposes of this specification and the appended claims, the expression “trace gas” denotes gases whose concentrations are below 1 part per million (on a volume basis), and preferably, depending on the significance of the analyte and the range within which variations can indicate a particular physiological condition or the onset of such a condition, below 300 parts per billion, below 200 parts per billion, or below 100 parts per billion. All concentrations herein, unless otherwise noted, are by volume. The invention is of particular interest in conjunction with a sensor consisting of cytochrome c in a sol-gel xerogel to measure NO. Sensors of this type and related technology are disclosed in the following pending U.S. patent applications, published U.S. patent applications, and issued U.S. patents: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/053,046, filed Feb. 7, 2005; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/053,253, filed Feb. 5, 2005; U.S. 2004-0017570 A1, published Jan. 29, 2004 (application Ser. No. 10/334,625, filed Dec. 30, 2002); U.S. 2005-0053549 A1, published Mar. 10, 2005 (application Ser. No. 10/659,408, filed Sep. 10, 2003); U.S. 2005-0083527 A1, published Apr. 21, 2005 (application Ser. No. 10/767,709, filed Jan. 28, 2004); U.S. Pat. No. 5,795,187, issued Aug. 18, 1998; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,010,459, issued Jan. 4, 2000. The disclosures of all patents and patent applications cited in this specification are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The foregoing is offered primarily for purposes of illustration, and variations can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. The locations of the pumps, for example, can vary. When a single pump is used, the pump can be placed upstream of the juncture where the flow passage is divided into two streams, and when using either one pump or two, the pump(s) can be placed upstream of the sensor. Further variations and embodiments of the invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.
This is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/053,047, filed Feb. 7, 2005, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4202352 | Osborn | May 1980 | A |
4248245 | Kempin | Feb 1981 | A |
4297871 | Wright et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4476708 | Baker et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
5092326 | Winn et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5129401 | Corenman et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5321972 | Stock | Jun 1994 | A |
5739412 | Stock et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5795187 | Sipe | Aug 1998 | A |
5873361 | Hakala | Feb 1999 | A |
6010459 | Silkoff et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6041777 | Faithfull et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067983 | Stenzler | May 2000 | A |
6616896 | Apperson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6733463 | Moilanen et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6815211 | Blazewicz et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7435225 | Hietala | Oct 2008 | B2 |
20030050567 | Baghdassarian | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040017570 | Parikh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050053549 | Parikh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050083527 | Flaherty et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060241507 | Carlson et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19545794 | Jun 1997 | DE |
19619763 | Nov 1997 | DE |
1505389 | Feb 2005 | EP |
WO 02091921 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 2004010120 | Jan 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060195040 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11053047 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11348943 | US |