This disclosure relates generally to equipment utilized and operations performed in conjunction with a subterranean well and, in an example described below, more particularly provides for controlling well operations based on monitored parameters of cement in a well.
In the past, failure of cement in a well has typically been reacted to, rather than proactively prevented. In general, the greatest measure of failure prevention occurs during the planning and installation of the cement. If failure subsequently occurs, it is dealt with then, typically with expensive and time consuming repair operations, and even including abandonment of the well.
It will, therefore, be appreciated that significant benefits could be achieved by actively monitoring parameters of the cement and modifying well operations if needed to prevent, or at least mitigate, damage to the cement.
In the disclosure below, a well monitoring system and associated method are provided which bring improvements to the art of preventing or mitigating damage to cement in a well. One example is described below in which an optical waveguide is used to monitor strain and other parameters of the cement. Another example is described below in which well equipment is controlled based on the monitored parameters of the cement.
In one aspect, the disclosure provides to the art a method of controlling a well operation. The method can include monitoring at least one parameter of cement lining a wellbore, with the monitoring being performed via at least one optical waveguide. The well operation may be modified in response to the parameter being outside of a predetermined acceptable range.
In another aspect, a well monitoring system is provided which can include at least one optical waveguide which is used to sense at least one parameter of cement lining a wellbore, an optical interrogation system optically connected to the optical waveguide, and a control system which controls operation of well equipment in response to information received from the optical interrogation system.
These and other features, advantages and benefits will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon careful consideration of the detailed description of representative examples below and the accompanying drawings, in which similar elements are indicated in the various figures using the same reference numbers.
Representatively illustrated in
As used herein, the term “cement” is used to indicate a hardenable material which is used to seal off an annular space in a well, such as the annulus 14. Cement is not necessarily cementitious, since other types of materials (e.g., polymers, such as epoxies, etc.) can be used in place of, or in addition to, a Portland type of cement. Cement can harden by hydrating, by passage of time, by application of heat, by cross-linking, and/or by any other technique.
As used herein, the term “casing” is used to indicate a generally tubular string which forms a protective wellbore lining. Casing may include any of the types of materials known to those skilled in the art as casing, liner or tubing. Casing may be segmented or continuous, and may be supplied ready for installation, or may be formed in situ.
In the system 10 of
For example, the cement 12 can be stressed beyond its load limit and/or fatigue limit, leading to cracks in the cement. Cracks in the cement 12 can allow fluid to leak through or past the cement, thereby allowing fluid communication between zones which should be isolated from each other, allowing fluids to leak to the surface, etc. Loadings from compaction and subsidence can cause similar situations to develop.
The result of such failure can be lost production, as desirable well products flow to other zones or injected fluids flow to non-target zones, or undesired well effluents enter a production flow stream. This can cause the operator to initiate costly remedial actions to attempt to reestablish the annular seal, or in the worst case abandon a well that still has hydrocarbon reserves, or would otherwise be useful.
It is possible to determine the desirable mechanical properties of a hardened cement sheath that are needed to withstand predicted well stress events under a given set of well conditions. However, the future is uncertain, and the actual operational conditions of the well may not be predictable with a high level of accuracy.
As described below, the present disclosure provides a method of monitoring the actual distributed in situ static and dynamic strain to which a hardened cement sheath is subjected in real time during the life of a well. The onset of undesirable strain or other parameter at any stage is detected, and well operations are modified as needed to ameliorate the undesirable situation. This can prevent the load limitations of the cement 12 being exceeded, thereby preserving the well integrity and avoiding costly well failure.
For example, in a hydrocarbon well, the flow rate of fluids from the formation 20 into the wellbore 18 can be changed to reduce heat transfer to the annulus 14, and thereby reduce strain in the cement 12 due to excessive temperature increase. In an injection well, the rate of flow of fluid into the formation 20 can be changed to reduce strain due to pressure in the cement 12. If the cement 12 is being strained due to subsidence or compaction, production rates can be adjusted as needed to reduce the subsidence or compaction.
One or more optical waveguides 22 are preferably installed in the well, so that they are operative to sense certain parameters of the cement 12. As depicted in
The optical waveguides 22 are preferably strapped, clamped or otherwise secured to an exterior of the casing 16, but other means of installing the optical waveguides may be used in other examples. The optical waveguides 22 may also be included in an overall optical waveguide assembly 30, as depicted in
The optical waveguides 22 may comprise optical fibers, optical ribbons or any other type of optical waveguides. The optical waveguides 22 may comprise single mode or multi-mode waveguides, or any combination thereof.
An optical interrogation system 24 is optically connected to the optical waveguides 22 at a remote location, such as the earth's surface, a sea floor or subsea facility, etc. The optical interrogation system 24 is used to launch pulses of light into the optical waveguides 22, and to detect optical reflections and backscatter indicative of parameters of the cement 12. The optical interrogation system 24 can comprise one or more lasers, interferometers, photodetectors, optical time domain reflectometers (OTDR's) and/or other conventional optical equipment well known to those skilled in the art.
A control system 26 receives information from the optical interrogation system 24 indicative of the sensed parameters of the cement 12. The control system 26 compares this real time information to predetermined acceptable ranges for the parameters and, if a sensed parameter is outside of its acceptable range, the control system will cause a change to be made in at least one item of well equipment 28.
For example, if excessive strain is detected in the cement 12 due to high temperature fluids being produced into the wellbore 18 from the formation 20, the rate of production can be decreased until the strain is again within the acceptable range. In an injection operation, the rate of injection could be reduced as needed to maintain the strain in the cement 12 within the acceptable range.
The optical waveguides 22 can in some embodiments sense acoustic vibrations in the cement 12 due, for example, to fluid flowing through or past the cement, to the cement cracking, etc. Well operations can be changed as needed in response to the sensing of acoustic vibrations in the cement 12.
Other sensors 30 can be included in the system 10 for monitoring various parameters of the cement 12. Depicted in
The acoustic signals from the sensors 30 are detected by the optical waveguides 22. In this manner, the hydration of the cement 12 at various distributed locations along the annulus 14 can be monitored.
Referring additionally now to
The configuration of wells depicted in
The control system 26 for the injection well is depicted in
The control system 26 for the production well is depicted in
The well monitoring system 10 preferably uses a combination of two or more distributed optical sensing techniques. These techniques can include detection of Brillouin backscatter and/or coherent Rayleigh backscatter resulting from transmission of light through the optical waveguides 22. Raman backscatter may also be detected and, if used in conjunction with detection of Brillouin backscatter, may be used for thermally calibrating the Brillouin backscatter detection data in situations where accurate strain measurements are desired.
The optical sensing techniques can be used to detect static strain, dynamic strain, acoustic vibration and/or temperature. These optical sensing techniques may be combined with any other optical sensing techniques, such as hydrogen sensing, stress sensing, etc.
Brillouin backscatter detection is preferably used to monitor static strain, with data collected at time intervals of a few seconds to hours. Most preferably Brillouin backscatter gain is detected as an indication of strain in the cement 12.
To ensure that one of the optical waveguides 22 experiences the same strain as the cement 12, the optical waveguide is preferably mechanically coupled to the cement. In this way, strain in the cement 12 is imparted to the optical waveguide.
The optical waveguides 22 could include one or more waveguides for Brillouin backscatter detection, depending on the Brillouin method used (e.g., linear spontaneous or non-linear stimulated). The Brillouin backscattering detection technique measures the natural acoustic velocity via corresponding scattered photon frequency shift in a waveguide at a given location along the waveguide.
The frequency shift is induced by changes in density of the waveguide. The density, and thus acoustic velocity, can be affected primarily by two parameters: strain and temperature.
In long term monitoring, it is expected that the temperature will remain fairly stable. If the temperature is stable, any changes monitored with a Brillouin backscattering detection technique would most likely be due to changes in strain in the cement 12. Thus, static strain measurements may be used to monitor deformation of the cement 12 over long periods of time.
In the event of sudden cement 12 failure, a sudden change in strain should be detected at the location of the failure. If self-healing cement is used, the stress in the cement should be seen changing as the healing takes place.
Preferably, however, accuracy will be improved by independently measuring strain and/or temperature, in order to calibrate the Brillouin backscatter measurements. An optical waveguide which is mechanically decoupled from the cement 12 and any other sources of strain may be used as an effective source of temperature calibration for the Brillouin backscatter strain measurements made using another mechanically coupled optical waveguide.
Coherent Rayleigh backscatter detection techniques can be used with either mechanically coupled or decoupled waveguides. Coherent Rayleigh backscatter is preferably used to monitor dynamic strain (e.g., acoustic pressure and vibration) in the cement 12.
The coherent Rayleigh backscatter detection techniques can detect stress failure events (such as cracking of the cement 12), flow noise in the annulus 14, lack of flow noise (e.g., due to healed cement or successful remedial operations to seal a previous leak).
Raman backscatter detection techniques are preferably used for monitoring distributed temperature in the cement 12. Such techniques are known to those skilled in the art as distributed temperature sensing (DTS).
Raman backscatter is relatively insensitive to distributed strain, although localized bending in a waveguide can be detected. Temperature measurements obtained using Raman backscatter detection techniques can, therefore, be used for temperature calibration of Brillouin backscatter measurements.
Distributed temperature measured using Raman backscatter detection techniques can be used to monitor the temperature of the cement 12 itself. In addition, the temperature measurements can be used to detect fluid flow through or past the cement 12 (for example, through cracks in the cement, or between the cement and the casing 16 or formation 20).
Raman light scattering is caused by thermally influenced molecular vibrations. Consequently, the backscattered light carries the local temperature information at the point where the scattering occurred.
The amplitude of an Anti-Stokes component is strongly temperature dependent, whereas the amplitude of a Stokes component of the backscattered light is not. Raman backscatter sensing requires some optical-domain filtering to isolate the relevant optical frequency (or optical wavelength) components, and is based on the recording and computation of the ratio between Anti-Stokes and Stokes amplitude, which contains the temperature information.
Since the magnitude of the spontaneous Raman backscattered light is quite low (e.g., 10 dB less than Brillouin backscattering), high numerical aperture (high NA) multi-mode optical waveguides are typically used, in order to maximize the guided intensity of the backscattered light. However, the relatively high attenuation characteristics of highly doped, high NA, graded index multi-mode waveguides, in particular, limit the range of Raman-based systems to approximately 10 km.
Brillouin light scattering occurs as a result of interaction between the propagating optical signal and thermally excited acoustic waves (e.g., within the GHz range) present in silica optical material. This gives rise to frequency shifted components in the optical domain, and can be seen as the diffraction of light on a dynamic in situ “virtual” optical grating generated by an acoustic wave within the optical media. Note that an acoustic wave is actually a pressure wave which introduces a modulation of the index of refraction via the elasto-optic effect.
The diffracted light experiences a Doppler shift, since the grating propagates at the acoustic velocity in the optical media. The acoustic velocity is directly related to the silica media density, which is temperature and strain dependent. As a result, the so-called Brillouin frequency shift carries with it information about the local temperature and strain of the optical media.
Note that Raman and Brillouin scattering effects are associated with different dynamic non-homogeneities in silica optical media and, therefore, have completely different spectral characteristics.
Coherent Rayleigh light scattering is also caused by fluctuations or non-homogeneities in silica optical media density, but this form of scattering is purely “elastic.” In contrast, both Raman and Brillouin scattering effects are “inelastic,” in that “new” light or photons are generated from the propagation of the laser probe light through the media.
In the case of coherent Rayleigh light scattering, temperature or strain changes are identical to an optical source (e.g., very coherent laser) wavelength change. Unlike conventional Rayleigh backscatter detection techniques (using common optical time domain reflectometers), because of the extremely narrow spectral width of the laser source (with associated long coherence length and time), coherent Rayleigh (or phase Rayleigh) backscatter signals experience optical phase sensitivity resulting from coherent addition of amplitudes of the light backscattered from different parts of the optical media which arrive simultaneously at a photodetector.
Referring additionally now to
As representatively illustrated in
The waveguide 22a is preferably used for distributed hydrogen sensing, waveguide 22b is preferably used for distributed acoustic sensing, and waveguide 22c is preferably used for distributed temperature sensing. Since in this example it is not desired for any of the waveguides 22a-c to have strain in the cement 12 imparted to the waveguide, the waveguides are loosely contained in the assembly 30, so that an outer enclosure 36 of the assembly can experience strain, without that strain being transmitted to the waveguides. Thus, the waveguides 22a-c are mechanically decoupled from strain in the assembly 30.
The waveguides 22d-f are preferably used for distributed strain sensing. Since in this example it is desired for the waveguides 22d-f to have strain in the cement 12 imparted to the waveguides, they are secured in the assembly 30 in a manner which transmits strain to the waveguides. For example, the waveguides 22d-f may be encapsulated in epoxy or another bonding agent 38, molded within the enclosure 36 if the tube 34 is not used, etc. Thus, the waveguides 22d-f are mechanically coupled to strain in the assembly 30.
Referring additionally now to
In step 42 of the method 40, a well operation is commenced. The well operation may be any type of well operation, such as an injection, stimulation, production, completion, testing, cementing or other type of operation. At this point, the optical waveguides 22 are preferably already installed in the wellbore 18 (for example, in the annulus 14 between the casing 16 and the formation 20).
In step 44, parameters of the cement 12 are monitored using the optical waveguides 22 and the optical interrogation system 24. As discussed above, the parameters can include any of dynamic strain, static strain, stress, temperature, acoustic vibrations, hydration, etc. Various optical techniques described above may be used for monitoring the parameters of the cement 12, and any one or combination of those techniques may be used in the method 40 in keeping with the principles of this disclosure.
In step 46 an evaluation is made whether any parameter monitored in step 44 is outside of an acceptable range. This evaluation may be made by the control system 26, and can involve a comparison between each real time measured parameter and a respective acceptable range for that parameter (for example, as input by an operator). The acceptable range may comprise a maximum or minimum threshold, in which case the acceptable range would be respectively below or above such threshold.
If a parameter is outside of its acceptable range, then the control system 26 provides a warning in step 48. This warning could take any form, such as an alert on a display screen, a warning message sent to a remote location, an alarm, etc.
In step 50, the well operation is modified in order to bring the parameter back into the acceptable range, or at least to prevent any damage (or further damage) to the cement 12. As described above, the control system 26 can make adjustments to certain well equipment 28 in order to accomplish this objective. Preferably, this modification of the well operation is automatic, but some human intervention may be used, if desired.
After the well operation has been modified in step 50, or if the parameters are found to be within their acceptable ranges in step 46, the method 40 returns to the step 44 of monitoring the cement parameters. Thus, it will be appreciated that the cement parameters are continually, or at least periodically, monitored to ensure that the parameters are maintained within their acceptable ranges, or that, if a parameter has been detected outside of its acceptable range, the modification to the well operation in step 50 has been successful.
Importantly, the method 40 is closed loop, in that it responds continually, or at least periodically, to changes in the parameters and modifies the well operation as needed to maintain the parameters within their respective acceptable ranges. Thus, damage to the cement 12 can be avoided (or at least minimized) by proactive modification of the well operation as needed.
Referring additionally now to
In
In
In
In
In
In
In
In each of the configurations described above, the optical waveguides 22 may be included in an assembly 30, such as that depicted in
Although only a few specific well operations which can benefit from the principles of this disclosure have been described in detail above, it will be appreciated that a wide variety of well operations not described above could also benefit from those principles. Additional well operations are discussed briefly below, but it should be clearly understood that the principles of this disclosure are not limited to only the specific well operations described herein.
The principles of this disclosure may be used to monitor and minimize cement sheath damage during well completion operations. Often, significant loads are exerted upon the casing 16 and the set cement 12 that surrounds it during well completion operations.
These loads may occur, for example, when displacing a heavy weight drilling fluid from inside the casing 16 that was used for well control purposes, with a lighter weight completion fluid. Any density difference between these two fluids will reduce the pressure differential on the casing 16 and cement 12 by Ph, where Ph in psi=0.05195×(higher−lower density in pounds per gallon)×height of fluid column. If strain in the cement 12 is above an acceptable range, then the completion fluid density can be modified to prevent damage to the cement.
In another example, a well may be treated with high pressure fracture stimulation during completion operations. The pressures used in stimulation operations can potentially be significant. These pressures have been documented as causes of cement 12 stress failure.
The principles of this disclosure provide for the health of the cement 12 to be monitored during these operations, and for the well completion operations to be altered as necessary before failure of the cement sheath may occur. For example, the well equipment 28 can include a pump used to pump stimulation fluids into the well, and the pump rate can be modified during the stimulation operation (if the strain in the cement is above an acceptable range) to maintain the stress on the cement 12 below a predetermined level.
The principles of this disclosure can be used to monitor and minimize cement 12 damage during thermal well cycling operations. When operating thermal wells, such as those producing geothermal energy, or those into which steam is injected for heavy oil recovery, it is often necessary to subject the wells to thermal cycles.
The nature of cement is that often it can only withstand a certain number of cycles, before an initially competent cement sheath may fail. The principles of this disclosure permit the health of the cement 12 to be monitored during thermal well cycling operations, and for the well operations to be altered as necessary before failure of the cement occurs. For example, when the onset of cement 12 stress failure is detected it may be possible to start operating the well at steady state conditions instead of thermally cycling the well.
The principles of this disclosure may be used to monitor the annular cement sheath integrity of storage and disposal wells for assurance purposes. It is critical to maintain an annular seal in gas storage and disposal wells. CO2 injection wells are also another class of well where long term cement sheath integrity is an important issue.
The principles described herein provide for the health of the cement 12 in these wells to be monitored in real time, and for well operators to take remedial action in the event that the onset of failure is noted, prior to that failure occurring. For example, it may be possible to cease active use of such wells to reduce the stress prior to damage occurring to the cement 12.
The principles of this disclosure provide for monitoring the cement 12 to detect an impending collision during template well construction operations, and to modify drilling operations in order to avoid such collisions. Often operators will construct a number of wells from the same surface template or with the conductor casings placed close together. In these cases, during the initial portion of well construction, especially if other wells in the template or area are actively being produced, the potential for the drill bit to accidently collide with an existing producing well exists.
Such a collision could prove hazardous to health, safety and the environment if it was to occur. The present disclosure provides for the health of the cement 12 in existing wells to be monitored as a new well is being drilled, and for any impending collision with a monitored cement sheath to be detected in real time and any necessary remedial action taken by those drilling the new wellbore.
This disclosure also provides for monitoring a cement sheath set through massive salt formations for detection of the onset of point loading. When constructing a well through massive salt sections such as those found in the North Sea, Brazil and the Gulf of Mexico, operators can be presented with the potential hazard of flowing salts. If an irregularly shaped wellbore 18 is drilled and the annulus 14 between this irregular wellbore and casing 16 is not completely filled with a cement 12 that develops compressive strength in a timely manner, then a potential exists for the flowing salt to point load the casing and collapse it.
The present disclosure provides for the health of the cement 12 in such wells to be monitored, and the onset of such point loading to be detected in real time and for remedial action to be taken. Such remedial action may include, for example, the running and cementing of a heavy wall scab liner over the affected section.
The principles of this disclosure also provide for monitoring the annulus 14 of subsea wells for annular pressure build up. With subsea wells, the build up of pressure caused by the heating of trapped fluid in the annulus 14 of these wells, can sometimes prove to be catastrophic.
The build up of pressure can be enough to exceed casing 16 collapse or burst limits. The principles described herein allow for the health of the cement 12 in such wells to be monitored, and for the onset of such annular pressure build up to be detected prior to failure limits being reached, so that remedial measures can be timely taken.
It may now be fully appreciated that the above disclosure provides several advancements to the art of controlling well operations and mitigating damage to cement in a well. The system 10 and associated method 40 provide for monitoring parameters of the cement 12 and modifying a well operation when a parameter is outside an acceptable range for the parameter.
In particular, the above disclosure describes a method 40 of controlling a well operation. The method 40 can include monitoring at least one parameter of cement 12 lining a wellbore 18, with the monitoring being performed via at least one optical waveguide 22. The well operation is modified in response to the parameter being outside of a predetermined acceptable range.
An optical interrogation system 24 may detect Brillouin backscatter gain and/or coherent Rayleigh backscatter resulting from light transmitted through the optical waveguide 22.
The at least one optical waveguide 22 may comprise at least first and second optical waveguides 22d,c. Strain in the cement 12 is imparted to the first optical waveguide 22d, and the second optical waveguide 22c is isolated from the strain in the cement 12. The second optical waveguide 22c may sense temperature of the cement 12.
The optical interrogation system 24 may detect Brillouin backscatter gain resulting from light transmitted through the first optical waveguide 22d, and the optical interrogation system 24 may detect Raman backscatter resulting from light transmitted through the second optical waveguide 22c.
The optical interrogation system 24 may detect coherent Rayleigh backscatter resulting from light transmitted through the first optical waveguide 22d, and the optical interrogation system 24 may detect Raman backscatter resulting from light transmitted through the second optical waveguide 22c.
The step of modifying the well operation can include changing a rate of production into the wellbore 18, changing a rate of fluid flow into a formation 20 surrounding the wellbore 18, modifying a density of a fluid circulated into the wellbore 18, modifying a pump rate of a stimulation fluid, modifying a thermal cycling operation, modifying a drilling operation (thereby avoiding a collision with the wellbore 18), and/or relieving pressure build up in an annulus 14.
The step of monitoring the at least one parameter can include detecting at least one of strain, stress and temperature, detecting hydration of the cement 12, detecting acoustic vibrations in the cement 12, detecting compression of the cement 12 and/or detecting point loading of casing 16.
Also described by the above disclosure is a well monitoring system 10. The system 10 can include at least one optical waveguide 22 which is used to sense at least one parameter of cement 12 lining a wellbore 18. An optical interrogation system 24 is optically connected to the at least one optical waveguide 22. A control system 26 controls operation of at least one item of well equipment 28 in response to information received from the optical interrogation system 24.
Operation of the well equipment 28 may be changed by the control system 26 in response to the parameter being outside of a predetermined acceptable range.
The well equipment 28 may regulate a rate of production into the wellbore 18, and/or a rate of fluid flow into a formation 20 surrounding the wellbore 18.
It is to be understood that the various examples described above may be utilized in various orientations, such as inclined, inverted, horizontal, vertical, etc., and in various configurations, without departing from the principles of the present disclosure. The embodiments illustrated in the drawings are depicted and described merely as examples of useful applications of the principles of the disclosure, which are not limited to any specific details of these embodiments.
In the above description of the representative examples of the disclosure, directional terms, such as “above,” “below,” “upper,” “lower,” etc., are used only for convenience in referring to the accompanying drawings.
Of course, a person skilled in the art would, upon a careful consideration of the above description of representative embodiments, readily appreciate that many modifications, additions, substitutions, deletions, and other changes may be made to these specific embodiments, and such changes are within the scope of the principles of the present disclosure. Accordingly, the foregoing detailed description is to be clearly understood as being given by way of illustration and example only, the spirit and scope of the present invention being limited solely by the appended claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2210417 | Kinley | Aug 1940 | A |
2242161 | Athy et al. | May 1941 | A |
2739475 | Nowak | Mar 1956 | A |
2803526 | Nowak | Aug 1957 | A |
3480079 | Guinn et al, | Nov 1969 | A |
3854323 | Hearn et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3864969 | Smith, Jr. | Feb 1975 | A |
4046220 | Glenn, Jr. | Sep 1977 | A |
4120166 | Brooks, Jr. | Oct 1978 | A |
4191250 | Messenger | Mar 1980 | A |
4208906 | Roberts, Jr. | Jun 1980 | A |
4330037 | Richardson et al. | May 1982 | A |
4410041 | Davies et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4520666 | Coblentz et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4575260 | Young | Mar 1986 | A |
4641028 | Taylor et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4703175 | Salour et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4714342 | Jackson et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4832121 | Anderson | May 1989 | A |
4927232 | Griffiths | May 1990 | A |
4976142 | Perales | Dec 1990 | A |
5026141 | Griffiths | Jun 1991 | A |
5163321 | Perales | Nov 1992 | A |
5182779 | D'Agostino et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5194847 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5249251 | Egalon et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5271675 | Fagan et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5326969 | Fagan et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5377160 | Tello et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5380995 | Udd et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5451772 | Narendran | Sep 1995 | A |
5488224 | Fagan et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5509474 | Cooke, Jr. | Apr 1996 | A |
5557406 | Taylor et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5641956 | Vengsarkar et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5862273 | Pelletier | Jan 1999 | A |
5892860 | Maron et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6004639 | Quigley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6041860 | Nazzal et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6082454 | Tubel | Jul 2000 | A |
6125935 | Shahin, Jr. | Oct 2000 | A |
6233374 | Ogle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6233746 | Skinner | May 2001 | B1 |
6268911 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279392 | Shahin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281489 | Tubel et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6354147 | Gysling et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6380534 | Farhadiroushan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6408943 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422084 | Fernald et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6437326 | Yamate et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6531694 | Tubel et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6555807 | Clayton et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6557630 | Harkins et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6588266 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6590647 | Stephenson | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6618677 | Brown | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6751556 | Schroeder et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6789621 | Wetzel et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6828547 | Tubel et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6834233 | Economides et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6847034 | Shah et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6913079 | Tubel | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6913083 | Smith | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919079 | Fishman et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6920395 | Brown | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6945095 | Johansen | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6957574 | Ogle | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6977367 | Tubel et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978832 | Gardner et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6981549 | Morales et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6992048 | Reddy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6997256 | Williams et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7000696 | Harkins | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7006918 | Economides et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7021146 | Nash et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7040390 | Tubel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055604 | Jee et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066284 | Wylie et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7086484 | Smith, Jr. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7140435 | Defretin et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7140437 | McMechan et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7159468 | Skinner et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7163055 | Coon et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168311 | Zisk, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7182134 | Wetzel et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7219729 | Bostick, III et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7219730 | Tilton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7245791 | Rambow et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7255173 | Hosie et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7282697 | Thomas et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7328624 | Gysling et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7345953 | Crickmore et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7357021 | Blacklaw | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7398680 | Glasbergen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409858 | Dria et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7430903 | Ramos | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7441605 | Coronado et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7458273 | Skinner et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7511823 | Schultz et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7529434 | Taverner et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7730774 | Glasbergen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7779683 | Glasbergen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7997340 | Bostick et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20020040963 | Clayton et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020060070 | Ramos et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020064331 | Davis et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020179301 | Schultz et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030094281 | Tubel | May 2003 | A1 |
20030166470 | Fripp et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030205083 | Tubel et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236626 | Schroeder et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040040707 | Dusterhoft et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040084180 | Shah et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109228 | Aronstam | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040113104 | Maida, Jr. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050120796 | Nash et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149264 | Tarvin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060010973 | Brown | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060109746 | Crickmore et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060133203 | James et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070120051 | DiFoggio et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070234786 | Tarvin | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234788 | Glasbergen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070234789 | Glasbergen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080068586 | Kishida et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080088846 | Hayward et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080134775 | Pipchuk et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080181554 | Taverner et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080236836 | Weng | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273852 | Parker et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090114386 | Hartog et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20110030467 | Bakulin | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110088462 | Samson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110090496 | Samson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120013893 | Maida et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120018167 | Konopczynski et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120132417 | Dria et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2320394 | Apr 2001 | CA |
2626596 | Apr 2009 | CA |
1464204 | Dec 2002 | EP |
0910725 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1355166 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1355169 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1357401 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1468258 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1464204 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1563323 | Mar 2007 | EP |
1466138 | Apr 2009 | EP |
1468258 | Apr 2010 | EP |
2230086 | Oct 1990 | GB |
2354782 | Apr 2001 | GB |
2362462 | Nov 2001 | GB |
2364380 | Jan 2002 | GB |
2364381 | Jan 2002 | GB |
2364384 | Jan 2002 | GB |
2367890 | Apr 2002 | GB |
2384108 | Jul 2003 | GB |
2384313 | Jul 2003 | GB |
2384644 | Jul 2003 | GB |
2386625 | Sep 2003 | GB |
2386687 | Sep 2003 | GB |
2397648 | Jul 2004 | GB |
2408327 | May 2005 | GB |
2408328 | May 2005 | GB |
2408329 | May 2005 | GB |
2408531 | Jun 2005 | GB |
1294985 | Mar 1987 | SU |
03021301 | Mar 2003 | WO |
03059009 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03062750 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03062772 | Jul 2003 | WO |
03081186 | Oct 2003 | WO |
03062772 | Dec 2003 | WO |
03081186 | Dec 2003 | WO |
03106940 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004001356 | Dec 2003 | WO |
2004020789 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004020790 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2004042425 | May 2004 | WO |
2004042425 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004076815 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004081509 | Sep 2004 | WO |
2004085795 | Oct 2004 | WO |
2004094961 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2004114487 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005035943 | Apr 2005 | WO |
2005064117 | Jul 2005 | WO |
2005116388 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2008098380 | Aug 2008 | WO |
2008119951 | Oct 2008 | WO |
2008119951 | Nov 2009 | WO |
2010020781 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010020795 | Feb 2010 | WO |
2010020796 | Feb 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Partial Search Report issued Apr. 7, 2011 for International application No. PCT/GB2010/001949, 5 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued Aug. 19, 2010, for International Patent Application No. PCT/10/024100, 14 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Jul. 4, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/GB2010/001949, 15 pages. |
Carnahan, B.D.; Clanton, R.W.; Koehler, K.D.; Harkins, G.O.; and Williams, G.R.; Fiber Optic Temperature Monitoring Technology, SPE 54599; May 26-28, 1999; Anchorage, AK, US. |
Saputelli, L.; Mendoza, H.; Finol, J.; Rojas, L.; Lopez, E.; Bravo, H.; and Buitriago, S.; Monitoring Steamflood Performance through Fiber Optic Temperature Sensing, SPE 54104; Mar. 17-19, 1999; Bakersfield, CA, US. |
Karaman, O.; Kutlik, R.; and Kluth, E.; A Field Trial to Test Fiber Optic Sensors for Downhole Temperature and Measurements, West Coalinga Field, California, SPE 35685; May 22-24, 1996; Anchorage, AK, US. |
Botto, G.; Maggioni, B.; and Schenato, A.; Electronic, Fiber-Optic Technology: Future Options for Permanent Reservoir Monitoring, SPE 28484; Sep. 25-28, 1994; New Orleans, LA, US. |
Bjornstad, B.; Kvisteroy, T.; and Eriksrud, M.; Fibre Optic Well Monitoring System, SPE 23147; Sep. 3-6, 1991; pp. 425-432; Aberdeen, UK. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Aug. 19, 2010, for US Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US10/024100, 14 pages. |
Office Action issued Dec. 10, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,503, 8 pages. |
Office Action issued Nov. 29, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,483, 20 pages. |
Office Communication issued Dec. 10, 2007, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,483, 3 pages. |
Office Action issued Sep. 26, 2008, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,503, 23 pages. |
Office Action issued Apr. 14, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,503, 9 pages. |
Office Action issued Jan. 12, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/167,884, 16 pages. |
Office Action issued Jan. 13, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/167,910, 16 pages. |
Naotsugu Ikeda, “Fractured Reservoir Management by Fiber Optic Distributed Temperature Measurement,” Sep. 27-28, 2000, 6 pages. |
John Fagley, H.S. Fogler, C.B. Davenport, and R.S. Millhone, “An Improved Simulation for Interpreting Temperature Logs in Water Injection Wells,” SPE 10081, Oct. 1982, 10 pages. |
R.N. Home, J.L. Perrick, and J. Barua, “The Use of Microcomputers in Well Test Data Acquisition and Analysis,” SPE 15308, Jun. 18-20, 1986, SilverCreek, CO, 9 pages. |
M.Y. Soliman, “Technique for Considering Fluid Compressibility and Temperature Changes in Mini-Frac Analysis,” SPE 15370, Oct. 5-8, 1986, New Orleans, LA, 11 pages. |
W.S. Lee, “Study of the Effects of Fluid Rheology on Minifrac Analysis,” SPE 16916, Sep. 27-30, 1987, Dallas, TX, 10 pages. |
B. Bjornstad, T. Kvisteroy, and M. Eriksrud, “Fibre Optic Well Monitoring System,” SPE 23147, Sep. 3-6, 1991, Aberdeen, 8 pages. |
M.P. Cleary, D.E. Johnson, H.H. Kogsboll, K.A. Owens, K.F. Perry, C.J. de Pater, A. Stachel, H. Schmidt, and M. Tambini, “Field Implementation of Proppant Slugs to Avoid Premature Screen-Out of Hydraulic Fractures with Adequate Proppant Concentration,” SPE 25892, Apr. 12-14, 1993, Denver, CO, 16 pages. |
G. Botto, B. Maggioni and A. Schenato, “Electronic, Fiber-Optic Technology: Future Options for Permanenet Reservoir Monitoring,” SPE 28484, Sep. 25-28, 1994, New Orleans, LA, 10 pages. |
O.S. Karaman, R.L. Kutlik, and E.L. Kluth, “A Field Trial to Test Fiber Optic Sensors for Downhole Temperature and Pressure Measurements, West Coalinga Field, California,” SPE 35685, May 22-24, 1996, Anchorage, AK, 7 pages. |
L. Saputelli, H. Mendoza, J. Finol, L. Rojas, E. Lopez, H. Bravo, and S. Buitriago, “Monitoring Steamflood Performance through Fiber Optic Temperature Sensing,” SPE 54104, Mar. 17-19, 1999, Bakersfield, CA, 7 pages. |
B.D. Carnahan, R.W. Clanton, K.D. Koehler, G.O. Harkins, and G.R. Williams, “Fiber Optic Temperature Monitoring Technology,” SPE 54599, May 26-28, 1999, Anchorage, AK, 10 pages. |
Klas Eriksson, “Fiber Optic Sensing—Case of ‘Solutions Looking for Problems’,” SPE 71829, Aberdeen, Scotland, Sep. 4-7, 2001, 5 pages. |
D. Callison, J. Jones, B. Shelley, and R. Lockman, “Integrated Modeling of a Field of Wells—An Evaluation of Western Shallow Oil Zone Completion Practices in the Elk Hills Field, Kern County, California,” SPE 76724, Anchorage, AK, May 20-22, 2002, 10 pages. |
G. Corbett, E. Fagervik, S. Christie, B. Smith, and K. Falcon, “Fiber Optic Monitoring in Openhole Gravel Pack Completions,” SPE 77682, San Antonio, TX, Sep. 29-Oct. 2, 2002, 14 pages. |
G.A. Brown, and A. Hartog, “Optical Fiber Sensors in Upstream Oil & Gas,” SPE 79080, 2002, 3 pages. |
G. Brown, D. Storer, K. McAllister, M. al-Asimi, and K. Raghavan, “Monitoring Horizontal Producers and Injectors During Cleanup and Production Using Fiber-Optic-Distributed Temperature Measurements,” SPE 84379, Oct. 5-8, 2003, Denver, CO, 6 pages. |
D.O. Johnson, R. Sugianto, P.H. Mock, and C.H. Jones, “Identification of Steam-Breakthrough Intervals with DTS Technology,” SPE 87631, Feb. 2004, 8 pages. |
H. Foucault, D. Poilleux, A. Djurisic, M. Slikas, J. Strand, and R. Silva, “A Successful Experience for Fiber Optic and Water Shut Off on Horizontal Wells With Slotted Liner Completion in an Extra Heavy Oil Field,” SPE 89405, Apr. 17-21, 2004, Tulsa, OK, 6 pages. |
B. Hasebe, A. Hall, B. Smith, J. Brady, and P. Mehdizadeh, “Field Qualification of Four Multiphase Flowmeters on North Slope, Alaska,” SPE 90037, Sep. 26-29, 2004, Houston, TX, 13 pages. |
A. Bond, C. Blount, T. Kragas, and S. Mathias, “Use of a Fiber Optic Pressure/Temperature Gauge in an Exploration Well to Minimize Formation Damage Potential and Reduce Costs During Production Testing,” SPE 90130, Sep. 26-29, 2004, Houston, TX, 10 pages. |
L.B. Ouyang, and D. Belanger, “Flow Profiling via Distributed Temperature Sensor (DTS) System—Expectation and Reality,” SPE 90541, Sep. 26-29, 2004, Houston, TX, 14 pages. |
D. K. Nath, “Fiber Optics Used to Support Reservoir Remperature Surveillance in Duri Steamflood,” SPE 93240, Apr. 5-7, 2005, Jakarta, Indonesia, 9 pages. |
G. Glasbergen, D. van Batenburg, M. van Domelen, and R. Gdanski, “Field Validation of Acidizing Wormhole Models,” SPE 94695, May 25-27, 2005, Scheveningen, The Netherlands, 11 pages. |
G. Brown, V. Carvalho, A. Wray, A. Sanchez, and G. Gutierrez, “Slickline With Fiber-Optic Distributed Temperature Monitoring for Water-Injection and Gas Lift Systems Optimization in Mexico,” SPE 94989, Jun. 20-23, 2005, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 10 pages. |
K. Yoshioka, D. Zhu, A.D. Hill, P. Dawkrajai, and L.W. Lake, “A Comprehensive Model of Temperature Behavior in a Horizontal Well,” SPE 95656, Oct. 9-12, 2005, Dallas, TX, 15 pages. |
G. Gao, and Y. Jalali, “Interpretation of Distributed Temperature Data During Injection Period in Horizontal Wells,” SPE 96260, Oct. 9-12, 2005, Dallas, TX, 8 pages. |
V. Pimenov, G. Brown, V. Tertychnyi, A. Shandrygin, and Y. Popov, “Injectivity Profiling in Horizontal Wells Through Distributed Temperature Monitoring,” SPE 97023, Oct. 9-12, 2005, Dallas, TX, 8 pages. |
D.K. Nath, R. Sugianto, and D. Finley, “Fiber-Optic Distributed Temperature Sensing Technology Used for Reservoir Monitoring in an Indonesia Steam Flood,” SPE 97912, Nov. 1-3, 2005, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 10 pages. |
R.W. Clanton, J.A. Haney, R. Pruett, C.L. Wahl, J.J. Goiffon, and D. Gualtieri, “Real-Time Monitoring of Acid Stimulation Using a Fiber-Optic DTS System,” SPE 100617, May 8-10, 2006, Anchorage, AK, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Aug. 25, 2011 for International Patent Application No. PCT/ US10/024100, 8 pages. |
Kading, Horace, and Hutchins, John S., “Temperature Surveys; The Art of Interpretation,” American Petroleum Institute Division of Production, Mar. 12-14, 1969, 20 pages, Paper No. 906-14-N, Lubbock, Texas. |
Sakaguchi, Keiichi, and Matsushima, Nobuo, “Temperature Profile Monitoring in Geothermal Wells by Distributed Temperature Sensing Technique,” Geothermal Resources Council Transactions, Oct. 1995, 4 pages, vol. 19, Geological Survey of Japan, Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. |
Henninges, J., Zimmermann, G., Buttner, G., Schrotter, J., Erbas, K, and Huenges, E.,“Fibre-Optic Temperature Measurements in Boreholes,” FKPE-Workshop, Oct. 23-24, 2003, 9 pages, Hannover, Germany. |
Johnson, David O., and Van Domelen, Mary, “StimWatch Stimulation Monitoring Service,” Halliburton 2006 Special Meritorious Award for Engineering Innovation, 2006, 4 pages, Houston, Texas. |
Knott, Terry, “Wytch Farm Sees the Light,” Offshore Engineer, Dec. 1, 2000, 7 pages, oilonline.com. |
Kading, Horace, “Shut-in Temperature Profiles Tell Where the Water Went,” The Oil and Gas Journal, May 13, 1968, pp. 77-79. |
Schlumberger, Oilfield Glossary, Term “Joule-Thomson,” 2006, 1 page. |
Halliburton Reservoir Performance Monitoring, 2005, 2 pages. |
Nowak, T.J., “The Estimation of Water Injection Profiles from Temperature Surveys,” Petroleum Transactions, AIME, 1953, pp. 203-212, vol. 198. |
Sakaguchi, Keiichi, and Matsushima, Nobuo, “Temperature Logging by the Distributed Temperature Sensing Technique During Injection Tests,” Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, May 28-Jun. 10, 2000, pp. 1657-1661, Kyushu—Tohoku, Japan. |
Grobwig, St., Graupner, A. Hurtig, E., Kuhn, K., and Trostel, A., “Distributed Fibre Optical Temperature Sensing Technique—A Variable Tool for Monitoring Tasks,” 8th International Symposium on Temperature and Thermal Measurements in Industry and Science, Jun. 19-21, 2001, pp. 9-17. |
Hurtig, E., Ache, B., Grobwig, S., and Hanel, K., “Fibre Optic Temperature Measurements: A New Approach to Determine the Dynamic Behaviour of the Heat Exchanging Medium Inside a Borehole Heat Exchanger,” Terrastock 2000, 8th International Conference on Thermal Energy Storage, Aug. 28-Sep. 1, 2000, Stuttgart, Germany. |
Ikeda, N., Uogata,K., Kawazoe, S., and Haruguchi, K., “Delineation of Fractured Reservoir by Transient Temperature Analysis Using Fiber Optic Sensor,” Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, May 28-Jun. 10, 2000, pp. 2617-2621, Kyushu—Tohoku, Japan. |
Halliburton, “The Impact of Wellbore Phenomena on Fluid Placement and Zonal Coverage”, Gerard Glasbergen, Nov. 1-3, 2005, 9 pages. |
Oxy Elk Hills, “Using Fiber Optics to Divert Acid on the Fly in the Monterey Shale”, Ray Clanton, May 8-10, 2006, 46 pages. |
Pruett Industries, “Fiber Optic Distributed Temperature Sensor ‘DTS’ ”, dated at least as early as 2001, 51 pages. |
Office Action issued Mar. 29, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/603,334, 53 pages. |
Office Action issued Jan. 28, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/603,299, 44 pages. |
Baker Hughes Press Release; Shell and Baker Hughes Pioneer Real-time Compaction Imaging System; Jun. 26, 2009; 2 pages; Houston, Texas. |
Choi, K.N., Juarez, J.C., Taylor, H.F.; Distributed Fiber-Optic Pressure/Seismic Sensor for Low-Cost Monitoring of Long Perimeters; SPIE vol. 5090, E.M. Carapezza, ed. pp. 134-141; Apr. 2003; 10 pages; Orlando, Florida. |
Photonics.com; Fiber Optic Intrusion Sensor Protects Perimeters; Photonics.com Feature Articles; Jan. 28, 2005; 2 pages; Laurin Publishing; Pittsfield, Massachusetts. |
Thevenaz, Luc; Review & Progress in Distributed Fiber Sensing; Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Laboratory of Nanophotonics & Metrology; undated; 28 pages; Lausanne, Switzerland. |
Nikles, Marc; Fibre Optic Distributed Scattering Sensing System: Perspectives and Challenges for High Performance Applications; [Reprinted from the proceedings of] SPIE publication vol. 6619, Third European Workshop on Optical Fibre Sensors; Jul. 4-6, 2007; 8 pages; Napoli, Italy. |
Lobo Ribeiro, A. B., Eira, N., Sousa, J. M., Guerreiro, P. T. and Salcedo, A.R.; Multi-Point Fibre Optic Hot-Spot Network Integrated Into a High Power Transformer; SPIE vol. 6619, 66193V; 2007; 4 pages; Third European Workshop on Optical Fibre Sensors; Portugal. |
Halliburton, Pinnacle Reservoir Monitoring; StimWatch® Stimulation Monitoring Service; H04481; Jun. 2010; 4 pages. |
International Search Report with Written Opinion issued Nov. 8, 2012 for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/GB11/000907, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110308788 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |