Claims
- 1. A process for obtaining desired product yield, product quality, or both, of a fluid catalytic cracking unit, wherein a hydrocarbonaceous feed is introduced into a reaction zone, by atomizing said feed first mixing it with an atomizing vapor, the feeding said mixture through two or more feed injectors which are comprised of a nozzle having an internal throat section in fluid communication with the reaction zone ad the source of the feed, wherein the cross-sectional flow area of said throat section is variable by moving a throat insert member therein, wherein the atomization of said feed is effectively varied by varying the pressure drop across the two or more feed injectors by varying the cross-sectional flow area of the one or more feed injectors by causing the throat insert member to be moved, in real time, in response to a signal based on the difference between a measured product yield, measured product quality, or both, of the reaction zone and a predetermined set point of product yield, product quality, or both.
- 2. The process of claim 1, wherein said plurality of feed injectors is at least three feed injectors.
- 3. The process of claim 1, wherein the atomization is adjusted to change the measured naphtha liquid yield or selectivity.
- 4. The process of claim 1, wherein the atomization is adjusted to control the naphtha research clear number in an onstream mogas blending operation.
- 5. The process of claim 1, wherein the unit product yield and/or quality is cascaded to a feed injector pressure controller.
- 6. The process of claim 1, wherein said pressure drop .DELTA.P is monitored by a pressure controller.
- 7. The process of claim 6, wherein the pressure controller sends a signal to an actuator for varying the cross-sectional flow area of the nozzle, thereby varying the pressure drop.
- 8. The process of claim 1, wherein the atomization is adjusted based on measurements of feedstock chemistry wherein at least one measured component in the field is a precursor for a target reactor yield and/or quality.
- 9. The process of claim 1, wherein a pressure drop set point is selected based on unit response trends relating product yield or quality to pressure drop .DELTA.P.
- 10. The process of claim 9, wherein the pressure drop set point is selected based on field calibration data constructed for each feed injector to define the relationship between nozzle pressure drop .DELTA.P and position of a means for controlling the cross-sectional flow area of said nozzle portion of said feed injector.
- 11. The process of claim 10, wherein the field calibration data is incorporated into an application program that will send a signal to an actuator for varying the position of a body within the throat of said feed injector.
Parent Case Info
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 485,701, filed Feb. 27, 1990 now abandoned.
US Referenced Citations (30)
Continuations (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
485701 |
Feb 1990 |
|