Example embodiments of the present invention generally relate to paper, sheet and box manufacturing systems and, more particularly to, pre-print paper, sheet and box manufacturing systems.
Corrugated sheet and box manufacturing includes, in some cases, using a corrugator to glue together layers of board web with a flute medium positioned in between. Depending on the desired characteristics of the corrugated board web, different layers/arrangements can be combined. Once formed, the corrugated board web (e.g., top layer, flute medium, and bottom layer) may then be cut into appropriate sheet or box structures, and later scored, cut, glued etc. to form the knocked down box (that is then folded and manipulated to form the box, such as by the customer).
Depending on the desired sheet or box for the customer, one or more printers may be used to print images (e.g., symbols, marketing indicia, product information, etc.) thereon. Such printing may occur after formation of the layered corrugate (called “post-print”) or prior to formation of the layered corrugate, such as on the top layer (called “pre-print”).
Embodiments of the present invention provide systems for providing efficient manufacturing of sheet or box structures for corrugate. However, some embodiments of the present invention are contemplated for extension into other product manufacturing, including other paper based product manufacturing, such as folded carton, beverage, labels, flexible paper, industrial bags, plates, cups, décor, and many others.
Using digital print processes, enhanced image quality and variability can be achieved for images on the corrugated sheet or box (or other products). In particular, the digital printing may occur prior to formation of the layered corrugate (“pre-print”) to avoid printing difficulties and reliability for printing on the multi-layered corrugated structure.
In order to increase efficiency of manufacturing, some embodiments of the present invention contemplate various methods for control of the corrugator, enabling avoidance of significant product waste. To explain, one difficulty of printing during the pre-print phase is that each sheet or box structure on the corrugated board web still needs to be cut. However, it is important for the cut to be accurate since the printed images are already on the corrugated board web (e.g., you don't want to cut through an image or have an off center image for the sheet or box structure). In some embodiments, one or more corrugator plans and/or associated reel maps may be used to determine where to position and/or perform cuts with various knives of the corrugator for each sheet or box structure. However, manual checking of a corrugator plan and/or associated reel map and/or adjustment of the corrugator (such as the placement of the knives, slitters, or scorers) wastes time and product (e.g., when the corrugator is still running). In this regard, the present invention contemplates using various methods to achieve simplified automated control of the corrugator.
For example, in some embodiments, one or more colored markings may be used to indicate an order change section between two order sections. The colored markings may be detected as the corrugator runs and once detected, a controller may determine a next set of order instructions—e.g., changing order instructions to match the upcoming order. In such a regard, an order change may occur, thereby enabling automated control of the corrugator based on the new order instructions in order to cut new sheet or box structures during the upcoming order section. In some embodiments, the colored markings may be in the form of a standard cut-to-mark marking, but with a distinguishable color. In such a regard, the colored cut-to-mark marking may enable both detection of the order change section and cause initiation of one or more cuts to the corrugated board web. Another benefit of the proposed colored markings is the simplicity of the solution to enable a “blind” order change without requiring checking of the corrugator plan. This enables quick, easy and automated changing of the order instructions without utilizing computer “readable” markings.
In an example embodiment, a system for making corrugated box structures using a corrugator is provided. The system comprises a corrugated board web comprising at least a first order section and a second order section. The first order section includes at least one standard cut-to-mark marking that is used to signal an initiation of a cut of the corrugated board web to help form at least one first box structure. The second order section includes at least one standard cut-to-mark marking that is used to signal an initiation of a cut of the corrugated board web to help form at least one second box structure. The first order section is different than the second order section. The corrugated board web further comprises an order change section positioned between the first order section and the second order section. The order change section includes at least one colored cut-to-mark marking that is used to signal an initiation of a cut of the corrugated board web. The at least one colored cut-to-mark marking defines a color that is different than the standard cut-to-mark markings. The system further includes a cutting arrangement comprising at least one knife, wherein the knife is configured to cut the corrugated board web. The system further includes at least one detector that is configured to detect a color of one or more cut-to-mark markings on the corrugated board web. The at least one detector is positioned upstream of the at least one knife. The system further includes a controller configured to operate one or more components of the corrugator according to a first set of order instructions corresponding to the first order section, wherein the first set of order instructions are obtained from a corrugator plan. The controller is further configured to determine, based on data received from the at least one detector, the occurrence of at least one colored cut-to-mark marking. The occurrence of at least one colored cut-to-mark marking is determined by the at least one detector detecting the at least one colored cut-to-mark marking of the order change section. The order change section of the corrugated board web followed the first order section of the corrugated board web as the corrugated board web passes through the corrugator. The controller is further configured to determine, in response to determining the occurrence of the colored cut-to-mark marking, a next set of order instructions for a next order in the corrugator plan. The next set of order instructions is a second set of order instructions corresponding to instructions for operating one or more components of the corrugator for the second order section. The controller is further configured to determine, based on the second set of order instructions, one or more instructions for operating the at least one knife. The controller is further configured to cause operation of the at least one knife according to the one or more instructions.
In some embodiments, the at least one knife is a slitter and the controller is further configured to determine, based on the second set of order instructions, a cross-direction position along the corrugated board web for the slitter to initiate a cut. The controller is further configured to cause the slitter to initiate the cut of the corrugated board web at the cross-direction position to separate the corrugated board web into two or more web structure lanes.
In some embodiments, the controller is further configured to determine, based on the second set of order instructions, a distance between cuts for the knife for one or more sheet structures in the second order section. The controller is further configured to cause the knife to initiate the cuts of the corrugated board web based on the distance.
In some embodiments, the cutting arrangement comprises a slitter and a scorer and the controller is further configured to determine, based on the second set of order instructions, one or more positions to apply one of the slitter or scorer to the corrugated board web and cause the slitter or scorer to be applied at the one or more positions on the corrugated board web.
In some embodiments, the order change section comprises an order change line.
In some embodiments, the order change section comprises a shear waste section. Additionally, in some embodiments, system further comprises at least one shearing knife and the controller is further configured to cause the at least one shearing knife to initiate a cut of the corrugated board web along a width of the corrugated board web in the cross-direction upon detection of the colored cut-to-mark marking to separate the shear waste section from an adjacent order section of the corrugated board web. The cut is initiated at a position along the corrugated board web corresponding to the position of the colored cut-to-mark marking such that the colored cut-to-mark marking triggers initiation of both a change in order instructions and a cut to separate the shear waste section from an adjacent order section of the corrugated board web.
In some embodiments, the controller is configured to determine the occurrence of the at least one colored cut-to-mark marking in an instance in which a color value of the color of the cut-to-mark marking detected by the at least one detector is within a predetermined color value range. The predetermined color value range corresponds to a predetermined color for the at least one colored cut-to-mark marking of the shear waste section.
In some embodiments, the controller is configured to determine the occurrence of the at least one colored cut-to-mark marking by determining the occurrence of a predetermined number of colored cut-to-mark markings.
In some embodiments, the controller is configured to determine the occurrence of the at least one colored cut-to-mark marking by determining the occurrence of at least two colored cut-to-mark markings, wherein each set of adjacent colored cut-to-mark markings are separated by at least a predetermined distance.
In some embodiments, the controller is configured to determine, in response to determining the occurrence of the colored cut-to-mark marking, the next set of order instructions for the next order in the corrugator plan without confirming the position of the corrugated board web with respect to the corrugator plan.
In another example embodiment, a web of printed material used for forming corrugated board web is provided. The web comprises a first order section that includes at least one cut-to-mark marking that is used to signal an initiation of a cut of the web to help form at least one first box structure. The web further comprises a second order section that includes at least one cut-to-mark marking that is used to signal an initiation of a cut of the web to help form at least one second box structure. The first order section is different than the second order section. The web further comprises an order change section positioned between the first order section and the second order section. The web further comprises at least one colored cut-to-mark marking included within at least one of the first order section, the second order section, or the order change section. The at least one colored cut-to-mark marking, when read by a mark detector, is configured to trigger a change in order instructions for a corrugator.
Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments, a computer-readable marking on the top layer may be “read” during the manufacturing process to enable various control abilities during the manufacturing process. For example, by “reading” the marker and querying the corrugator plan and/or associated reel map, the corrugator controller can determine the actual position of the corrugated board web in the corrugator. This can be checked against the intended (e.g., scheduled or theoretical) position of the corrugated board web in the corrugator. Such information may, in some cases, be displayed to an operator for making a determination as to whether to stop (e.g., through an emergency stop) and/or change operation of the corrugator. In some embodiments, the actual position and the theoretical position may be displayed side-by-side as a visual representation for the operator to make a comparison. In some embodiments, automated comparisons could be performed and one or more indications could be provided to the operator. Similarly, an automated stop or change in operation of the corrugator could be implemented if there is a difference between the actual position and the theoretical position. The present invention contemplates many different types of “readable” markers (e.g., QR codes, bar codes, etc.).
In an example embodiment, a system for making corrugated box structures using a corrugator is provided. The system comprises a corrugated board web comprising at least a first order section and a second order section. The first order section includes at least one cut-to-mark marking that is used to signal an initiation of a cut of the corrugated board web to help form at least one first box structure. The second order section includes at least one cut-to-mark marking that is used to signal an initiation of a cut of the corrugated board web to help form at least one second box structure. The first order section is different than the second order section. The corrugated board web further comprises an order change section positioned between the first order section and the second order section. At least one of the first order section, the second order section, or the order change section includes at least one readable marking. The system further includes at least one readable mark detector that is configured to read data from one or more readable markings on the corrugated board web. The system further includes a display and a controller configured to operate one or more components of the corrugator according to a set of current order instructions corresponding an order section of the corrugated board web, wherein the set of current order instructions are obtained from a corrugator plan. The controller is further configured to determine a detected current position of the corrugated board web in the corrugator based on data read by the at least one readable mark detector from the one or more readable markings on the corrugated board web. The controller is further configured to determine a theoretical current position of the corrugated board web based on at least the current set of order instructions from the corrugator plan that are being utilized in operation of the corrugator. The controller is further configured to cause display of both a representation of the detected current position of the corrugated board web and a representation of the theoretical current position of the corrugated board web to enable an operator to compare the detected current position of the corrugated board web and the theoretical current position of the corrugated board web.
In some embodiments, the controller is configured to receive user input directing the corrugator to perform an emergency stop and cause, in response to receiving the user input, the corrugator to cease operation.
In some embodiments, the controller is configured to compare the detected current position of the corrugated board web and the theoretical current position of the corrugated board web and provide an indication to a user in an instance in which the detected current position of the corrugated board web is different than the theoretical current position of the corrugated board web.
In some embodiments, the representation of the detected current position of the corrugated board web is presented in the form of a set of order instructions for one or more components of the corrugator and the representation of the theoretical current position of the corrugated board web is presented in the form of a set of order instructions for one or more components of the corrugator.
In some embodiments, the representation of the detected current position of the corrugated board web is presented in the form of a visualization of the corrugated board web with one or more box structure outlines and the representation of the theoretical current position of the corrugated board web is presented in the form of a visualization of the corrugated board web with one or more box structure outlines.
In addition to the above noted features, some embodiments of the present invention contemplate other features that can be used to form efficient manufacturing processes. In some embodiments, a designed platform with various modules can be formed to create an efficient process flow, such as for aggregation of orders printed onto reels and efficient tracking thereof. For example, the present invention contemplates on-the-fly arrangement and improvements of the process flow for which sheets or boxes are to be manufactured. In some cases, the manufacturing improvements could occur through a digitally printed marker that is read during sheet or box manufacturing.
Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
Some example embodiments now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all example embodiments are shown. Indeed, the examples described and pictured herein should not be construed as being limiting as to the scope, applicability or configuration of the present disclosure. Rather, these example embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
Corrugated sheet and box manufacturing is an example paper, sheet, and/or box manufacturing system. In some such manufacturing, a corrugator is used to glue together layers of board web with a flute medium positioned in between. Depending on the desired characteristics of the corrugate board web, different layers/arrangements can be combined. Once formed, the corrugate board web (e.g., top layer, flute medium, and bottom layer) may then be cut into appropriate sheet or box structures, and later scored, cut, glued etc. to form the broken down box (that is then folded and manipulated to form the box, such as by the customer). Although the following description provides detailed examples of “corrugators”, some example embodiments of the present invention contemplate the term “corrugator” to mean a board-making device, such as a high speed laminator.
In the ordering phase 12, a customer may supply an order that includes desired characteristics for the end product. For example, the customer may provide a number of desired sheet or box structures, sheet or box shape requirements, one or more images/designs for printing on the sheet or box, color specifications, among many others. In some embodiments, the customer 12 may input such an order through a web interface. The web interface may enable the customer 12 to easily input the desired characteristics of the order electronically. The web interface may also enable the customer to perform many related tasks, including, for example, updating orders, tracking orders, handling payment, requesting assistance, setting up automated ordering (e.g., recurring ordering), viewing and approving example images (“soft proofing”), viewing example end products, etc.
In addition to providing increased efficiency of process for the customer, the web interface may also directly interact with and provide information for automated processes useful in the remainder of the manufacturing process 10. For example, the information from the web interface may be fed directly into a corrugator plan controller (such as the controller 90) and utilized accordingly. For example, as described herein, the information from the web interface may be used to form a corrugator plan and/or associated reel map or print plan of the corrugated sheet or box structure making process. Additionally, however, the information from the web interface may be used to provide on-the-fly updates or adjustments to the manufacturing process. Further, feedback (e.g., from the controller 90) may be provided back to the web interface for the customer, such as tracking information, images of the completed sheet or box structures, among other things.
In some embodiments, a corrugator plan controller may be configured to perform various functionality useful in the manufacturing process 10 (e.g., the various modules/phases described herein). For example, the corrugator plan controller (such as during the planning phase 14) may be configured to form or determine a corrugator plan (which may include an associated reel map), such as may be used in conjunction with the corrugator 50 (e.g., during the board making phase 40 and/or cutting phase 60). In some embodiments, such as with respect to illustrated in
As used herein, in some embodiments, an associated reel map may be an example of a corrugator plan. In this regard, other example corrugator plans (e.g., a print plan) can be used, formed, etc. Further, in some embodiments, a corrugator plan may be an example or a portion of a reel map. Additionally or alternatively, the corrugator plan controller may be configured to form a print plan that is used in the printing phase 30 (such as described herein). Likewise, the corrugator plan controller may be used with the ordering phase 12, such as to receive order information, the finishing phase 70, and/or the tracking/logistics phase 80. An example corrugator plan controller is described herein as controller 90 (which is shown and described with respect to
In some embodiments, a corrugator plan and/or associated reel map may provide a layout of the order and arrangement of the sheet or box structures that are to be printed on, formed, and cut during the manufacturing process. For example, a reel map for the section of layered corrugated board web 20 shown in
In some embodiments, a corrugator plan and/or associated reel map may be an electronic-based map that is reference-able for determining how the corrugator should operate. In some embodiments, the reel map may be representable in a visual form that shows a layout of the board web (such as shown in
In the past, pre-print orders and the corrugator plan and/or associated reel maps for pre-print were created far in advance of the manufacturing process with fixed graphics and structures across and down the web. To explain, limited flexibility existed in order minimum run length, graphic and structure variability, and ability to change parameters later on. With digital print processes, orders, graphics and structures can easily vary even within a reel, both across and down the web. In some cases, the order or sheet/box structure change may not be automatically detected and, thus, force manual detection to enable necessary corrections to the corrugator (e.g., the knives, slitters, and scorers). This can potentially lead to significant increased waste due to a large amount of empty or unused corrugated board web or “scrap” sheet or box structures being generated while the corrugator makes necessary corrections.
In some embodiments, the planning and/or updating of the process flow may be performed electronically and automatically updated. In this regard, the planning and updating of the reel may occur in real time, providing for the best chance to increase efficient operation of the corrugator, such as to avoid waste.
Additionally or alternatively, by enabling such electronic process flow updating, expedited orders may be inputted easily, enabling quicker response to customer needs. Likewise, changes in orders can be easily addressed without leading to unnecessary waste.
In some embodiments, sections of the process flow can be shifted from plant to plant or device to device due to various external circumstances. For example, repair of certain parts of the corrugator, replacing certain printer inks, etc., may cause only certain customer sheet or box structures to be able to be manufactured. In this regard, in some embodiments, certain portions of the process flow may be shifted, such as being jumped in line, moved to another facility, etc., in order to maintain efficient up time of operation of the printer(s) and corrugator(s).
The manufacturing process 10 may also including the printing phase 30, a reel editor phase 40, and a board making/cutting phase 60. In some embodiments, the printing phase 30, reel editor phase 40, and board making/cutting phase 60 may be performed using a corrugator 50 (such as shown in
With reference to
As described herein, in some embodiments, a corrugator plan driven process flow (e.g., reel map, control plan, etc.) may be used to help maintain efficient operation of the corrugator and avoid waste during making of the sheet or box structures. In this regard, a certain arrangement of sheet or box structures may progress through the corrugator 50. Such operation and tracking may occur, such as through use of the controller 90.
As described in more detail herein, the controller 90 provides logic and control functionality used during operation of the corrugator 50 and, in some embodiments, the entire manufacturing process 10. In some embodiments, the functionality of the controller 90 may be distributed to several controllers that each provide more limited functionality to discrete portions of the operation of manufacturing process 10.
The controller 90 may comprise one or more suitable electronic device(s)/server(s) capable of executing described functionality via hardware and/or software control. In some embodiments, the controller 90 may include one or more user interfaces (not shown), such as for displaying information and/or accepting instructions. The controller 90 can be, but is not limited to, a microprocessor, microcomputer, a minicomputer, an optical computer, a board computer, a complex instruction set computer, an ASIC (application specific integrated circuit), a reduced instruction set computer, an analog computer, a digital computer, a molecular computer, a quantum computer, a cellular computer, a solid-state computer, a single-board computer, a buffered computer, a computer network, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA) or a hybrid of any of the foregoing.
The controller 90 may be operably coupled with one or more components of the manufacturing process 10, including for example, the roll 21 of the top layer 22 of corrugated board web, a medium holder (e.g., roll) 28 of medium 29, the roll 23 of the bottom layer 24 of corrugated board web, various components of the printing phase 30, various components of the reel editor phase 40, various components of the board making/cutting phase 60, conveyance means of the corrugator, various components of phases for the manufacturing process, and other components (such as described herein). For example, depending on the components, the controller 90 may be operably coupled such as through use of solid-core wiring, twisted pair wiring, coaxial cable, fiber optic cable, mechanical, wireless, radio, infrared, etc. In this regard, depending on the components, the operable coupling may be through one or more intermediate controllers or mechanical coupling, such as used for controlling some components (e.g., controlling operation and/or feeding of the roll 21 of the corrugated board web). In some embodiments, the controller 90 may be configured to provide one or more operating signals to these components and to receive data from these components.
As noted above, the controller 90 (e.g., the corrugator plan controller) may be split into more than one controller, such as multiple controllers that exchange information, data, instructions, etc. For example, the controller 90 may be split into a corrugator planning software controller, a corrugator machine user interface controller, a corrugator system controls, press 30 operations and graphics workflow software and/or specific functional controls (e.g., a separate vision system such as described herein).
In some embodiments, such as described in greater detail herein, the controller 90 may be operably coupled to one or more vision systems, such as for detecting markers and/or defects/errors during the manufacturing process. Depending on the feedback from the vision systems, the controller 90 may control the corrugator 50 and/or manufacturing process 10 accordingly.
The controller 90 may include one or more processors coupled to a memory device. Controller 90 may optionally be connected to one or more input/output (I/O) controllers or data interface devices (not shown). The memory may be any suitable form of memory such as an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) chip, a flash memory chip, a disk drive, or the like. As such, the memory may store various data, protocols, instructions, computer program code, operational parameters, etc. In this regard, controller may include operation control methods embodied in application code. These methods are embodied in computer instructions written to be executed by one or more processors, typically in the form of software. The software can be encoded in any suitable language, including, but not limited to, machine language, assembly language, VHDL (Verilog Hardware Description Language), VHSIC HDL (Very High Speed IC Hardware Description Language), Fortran (formula translation), C, C++, Visual C++, Java, ALGOL (algorithmic language), BASIC (beginners all-purpose symbolic instruction code), visual BASIC, ActiveX, HTML (HyperText Markup Language), and any combination or derivative of at least one of the foregoing. Additionally, an operator can use an existing software application such as a spreadsheet or database and correlate various cells with the variables enumerated in the algorithms. Furthermore, the software can be independent of other software or dependent upon other software, such as in the form of integrated software. In this regard, in some embodiments, the controller 90 may be configured to execute computer program code instructions to perform aspects of various embodiments of the present invention described herein.
Depending on the configuration of the corrugator, the printing phase 30 may occur prior to combining the layers of corrugated board web 21, 23 and flute medium 28 (e.g., “pre-print”) or after combining two or more layers (e.g., “post-print”). In some embodiments, printing may occur to other layers (e.g., the bottom layer 23), such as in alternative to or in addition to the top layer 21.
Using digital print processes, enhanced image quality can be achieved for images on the corrugated board web (or other products). However, digital printing may have difficulties or less desirable quality if it occurs after formation of the layers. In this regard, printing may be difficult based on many corrugated board attributes including, but not limited to, dust, burnishing, fluting, warp, etc. In this regard, some embodiments of the present invention contemplate printing prior to formation of the layers of corrugate and/or flute medium. This enables increased print reliability and better image quality.
During the printing phase 30, the controller 90 may direct the press digital front end (DFE) and raster image processor (RIP), etc., to print one or more images at specific locations on the top layer 22 of the paper web. Depending on the configuration of the corrugator 50 and/or manufacturing process 10, the controller 90 may utilize a process flow (e.g., reel map) to determine where on the paper web to print the images and/or markers. For example, an image selected by the customer (such as a bottle), may be printed in the center (or other section) of a sheet or box structure—such as may ultimately be visible for marketing or other purposes once the box is formed. Any image (including, words, instructions, etc.) are contemplated by various embodiments of the present invention. Example markers that can be printed, include any marker that may be used by various components of the manufacturing process 10, such as for tracking, cutting, printing, etc. Further description regarding possible markers and their utilization is provided in greater detail herein. In this regard, the controller 90 may be connected to one or more vision systems (e.g., detectors) that are used to read or detect color, defects, and/or various markers for controlling and/or updating operation of the corrugator 50.
During the reel editor phase 40, the controller 90 may be configured to perform functions described herein related to editing or determining whether to edit the printed top layer of board web. Although shown in-line, in some example embodiments, the reel editor 40 may be out of line or near-line such that the roll of web product may be transferred to the reel editor 40 for processing. In some embodiments, the corrugator may have one or more functions/features that enable editing of the roll of web product (such as removing waste). In some such example embodiments, the reel editor 40 may form part of the corrugator.
During the board making phase 45, the controller 90 may be configured to cause combining of one or more layers and/or flute medium to form the corrugated board web for the boxes. For example, the controller 90 may be configured to cause fluted medium 29 to be fed into contact with one or more layers of corrugated board web, such as between a top layer 22 (such as from the roll 21) and a bottom layer 24 (such as from the roll 23). In this regard, in some embodiments, the fluted medium 29 may be fed into contact with the top layer 22 prior to the combined fluted medium 29 and top layer 22 coming into contact with the bottom layer 24. The controller 90 may cause formation of the combined layers into a layered corrugated board web 20, such as through use of glue or other adhesive.
During a corrugator editing phase 49, the controller 90 may be configured to edit the corrugated board web, such as by chopping out waste or undesirable corrugated board web. Such waste can be removed from the corrugator 50.
During the cutting phase 60, the controller 90 may be configured to cut out the sheet or box structures. In this regard, the controller 90 may be operably coupled to the various knives to control operation during the cutting phase 60. In some embodiments, the controller 90 may be configured to utilize the process flow (e.g., reel map) to determine how to operate the various knives (e.g., move the knives, cause a cut to occur, etc.).
As the layered corrugated board web 20 passes through the cutting phase, a slitter 64 may be configured to split the layered corrugated board web 20 to cause it to split into different sections that travel on different paths (such as the top section 26 that travels along the top path and the bottom section 27 that travels along the bottom path). In some embodiments, a first sheet or box structure may form the top section 26 and a second sheet or box structure may form the bottom section 27—thereby creating two different paths that separate the two types of sheet or box structures (e.g., sheet or box structure A, 91 is formed in the top section 26 and sheet or box structure B, 92 is formed in the bottom section 27). The location 65 in which the slitter 64 performs the cut is important because sheet or box structures may vary as the layered corrugated board web 20 travels through the corrugator. For example,
Once separated into different paths, the various sections of layered corrugated board web 26, 27 may pass through respective knives 66, 67. In some embodiments, the knives 66, 67 may be configured (such as based on instruction from the controller 90) to cut the sheet or box structures in the lateral (cross) direction in order to form the desired sheet or box structures. For example, knife 66 cut the top section 26 to form the sheet or box structures A, 96. Likewise, knife 67 cut the bottom section 27 to form the sheet or box structures B, 97.
In some embodiments, other knives may be utilized for cuts, such as side slitters for cutting scrap along the edges. Likewise, other components may be utilized, such as scorers for pre-creasing sheet or box structures. Such other knives and/or components may be formed as part of the above described systems.
Referring back to
The manufacturing process 10 may also include a tracking/logistics phase 80 that includes tracking the finished sheet or box structures and preparing/delivering them to the customer. In some embodiments, one or more tracking or counting systems can be implemented upstream in the manufacturing process 10, such as to enable tracking/logistic planning (including separating orders throughout the manufacturing process 10.
In some embodiments, the present invention contemplates using one or more color markings to indicate an order change in the corrugator plan (e.g., corrugator schedule). The colored markings may be detected as the corrugator runs and, once detected, a controller may determine a next set of order instructions—e.g., changing order instructions to know how to operate the corrugator (and the various components) to produce the upcoming order. In such a regard, an order change may occur and be detected, thereby enabling automated control of the corrugator based on the new order instructions in order to cut new sheet or box structures during the upcoming order section.
In some embodiments, the colored markings may be in the form of a standard cut-to-mark marking, but with a distinguishable color. In such a regard, the colored cut-to-mark marking may enable both detection of the order change section and cause initiation of one or more cuts to the corrugated board web. Another benefit of the proposed colored markings is the simplicity of the solution to enable a “blind” order change without requiring checking of the corrugator plan. This enables quick, easy and automated changing of the order instructions without utilizing computer “readable” markings.
In the depicted embodiment, a controller (CPU) 310 is connected to a sensor 305. The sensor 305 is configured to detect one or more color markings. In such a regard, the order change section 331 includes color markings 350. As the web runs through the corrugator, the sensor 305 detects the color markings 350. Upon such detection, the controller 310 is configured to determine an order change (e.g., changing from order section A 321 to order section B 322). Accordingly, the controller 310 uses the corrugator plan to pull in or load up the next set of order instructions (e.g., move from orders A to orders B). In some embodiments, the switch to new orders is “blind” such that there is no “confirmation”. Such an embodiment may save costs and processing power. Then, the controller 310 may begin instructing the corrugator using the new order instructions—such that the corrugator and its various components (e.g., the knives, slitters, scorers, etc.) operate to cut out the appropriate box structures (e.g., box structure outline B).
In some embodiments, such as in the depicted embodiment of
Though shown in
Some embodiments of the present invention contemplate many different ways to detect an order change using one or more colored markings. For example, detection of a single colored marking may indicate an order change. In some embodiments, detection of two or more colored markings may be needed to indicate an order change (e.g., at the beginning and end of the order change section). In some embodiments, there may need to be a predetermined distance between the two or more colored markings (e.g., a predetermined distance of at least 14 feet, between 13 feet and 15 feet, less than 10 feet, etc.). In some embodiments, a certain number of colored markings (e.g., 6 markings) may need to be detected to indicate an order change.
In some embodiments, the sensor may detect an intensity or color value of the colored markings and may check the detected color value against a predetermined color value threshold to determine if the detected colored marking is an intended color marking. For example, a number value may be assigned to colors on a spectrum (e.g., black has a color value of 0, cyan has a color value of 5, etc.). Upon detection of a colored marking, a color value could be determined (e.g., 4.5). That color value could be checked against a predetermined color value threshold, such as a color value range of 4-6. If the color value falls within the range, that may indicate the occurrence (or detection) of a colored marking indicative of an order change. Such example embodiments may be useful in distinguishing standard black cut-to-mark markings. Though the above example uses a range of color values, other threshold functions may be utilized by embodiments of the present invention.
In some embodiments, the number of colored markings, the color of the colored marking, and/or distances associated with multiple colored markings may indicate the exact position in the corrugator plan. For example, two consecutive markings may indicate that the corrugator plan is transitioning to the second set of order instructions. Such example embodiments may enable knowledge of the exact position of the corrugator plan.
In the depicted embodiment, a controller (CPU) 410 is connected to a sensor 405. The sensor 405 is configured to detect one or more color markings. In such a regard, the order change section 431 includes color markings 450. As the web runs through the corrugator, the sensor 405 detects the color markings 450. Upon such detection, the controller 410 is configured to determine an order change (e.g., changing from order section A 421 to order section B 422). Accordingly, the controller 410 uses the corrugator plan to pull in or load up the next set of order instructions (e.g., move from orders A to orders B). In some embodiments, the switch to new orders is “blind” such that there is no “confirmation”. Such an embodiment may save costs and processing power. Then, the controller 410 may begin instructing the corrugator using the new order instructions—such that the corrugator and its various components (e.g., the knives, slitters, scorers, etc.) operate to cut out the appropriate box structures (e.g., box structure outlines B and D).
In some embodiments, readable markers may be present on, at least, some of the web (e.g., on the sheet or box structures). Such readable markers (e.g., bar codes, QR codes, etc.) may, in some embodiments, be configured to enable confirmation of the position of the corrugator plan. Additionally, in some embodiments, the readable markers may enable tracking of the orders. Additionally or alternatively, the readable markers may supplement the color markers and enable some control of the corrugator upon being read and/or may be utilized for downstream processes after the corrugator (e.g., for tracking and other logistics).
In some embodiments, by “reading” the marker and querying the corrugator plan and/or associated reel map, the corrugator controller can determine the actual position of the board web in the corrugator. This can be checked against the intended (e.g., scheduled or theoretical) position of the board web in the corrugator. Such information may, in some cases, be displayed to an operator for making a determination as to whether to stop (e.g., through an emergency stop) and/or change operation of the corrugator. In some embodiments, the actual position and the theoretical position may be displayed side-by-side as a visual representation for the operator to make a comparison. In some embodiments, automated comparisons may be performed and one or more indications could be provided to the operator. Similarly, an automated stop or change in operation of the corrugator could be implemented if there is a difference between the actual position and the theoretical position.
As shown in the depicted embodiment, one or more detectors 210 may be positioned along the pathway through the corrugator. In this regard, the one or more detectors 210 may be configured to “read” or detect the marker and provide that information to the controller 290.
In some embodiments, an emergency stop feature 578 may be present to enable the operator to effect an emergency stop of the corrugator—such as in response to determining a difference between the actual position and the theoretical position. Additionally or alternatively, the operator may cause a change in the corrugator operation based on the observed difference between the actual position of the corrugator plan and the theoretical position of the corrugator plan. For example, the operator may select the appropriate set of order instructions for the corrugator to be using based on the actual position that is observed.
Although a visual representation of the corrugator plan is shown in
In some embodiments, the controller may be configured to compare the actual position of the corrugator plan with the theoretical position of the corrugator plan and provide one or more indications/instructions to a user of the display 570. For example, the controller may highlight one or more portions of the representation of the actual and/or theoretical corrugator plan to highlight a possible difference to the user. As another example, the controller may provide a message that indicates that there is a difference between the actual position and the theoretical position. Additionally or alternatively, the controller may be configured to determine one or more remedies that may be implemented (e.g., by the operator and/or automatically) to correct the position of the web and/or operation of the corrugator.
Though some of the above described embodiments incorporate a user, in some embodiments, in addition to or in the alternative of a user, the controller may be configured to automatically cause the corrugator to stop operation and/or change operation in response to detecting a difference between the actual position of the corrugator plan and the theoretical position of the corrugator plan.
The platform 100 includes a number of platform modules that interact with each other to form an integrated platform that provides efficient manufacturing processes. In the depicted embodiment, the platform 100 includes a web interface module 105, a structure module 110, a graphics file workflow module 115, a graphics file management module 120, a management information systems (MIS) module 125, an imposition engine module 130, a variable data engine module 135, a press module 140, a color management module 148, a press vision system module 145, a reel manifest module 150, a customer insights module 152, a reel editor module 155, a corrugator controls module 160, and an enterprise resource planning (ERP)/corrugator planning module 165. As described herein, the various modules each contain features that are designed to work together to provide an integrated, efficient platform 100 for manufacturing corrugated sheet or box structures for customers. In some embodiments, the controller 90 may be configured to communicate with and/or control operation of many of the various modules. While the depicted embodiment shows various particular modules, some embodiments of the present invention contemplate many variations, including additional modules and combinations in whole or part of shown modules to form a platform.
The web interface module 105 may be configured to provide for interaction between customers, users, and the platform 100. For example, the web interface module 105 may be configured to provide an interface for a customer to provide information to the platform 100, such as orders, changes to orders, payments, etc. The web interface module may also enable additional features, such as enabling a customer to print samples, upload their own art/images, track orders, among other things. Additionally, however, the web interface module 105 may be helpful for internal use, such as for tracking sales. The internal web interface may display pertinent information to the company, such as trends, etc. The web interface module 105 may communicate, for example, with the structure module 110, the workflow module 115, the management information systems module 125, and/or the ERP/corrugator planning module 165.
The structure module 110 may be configured to enable selection and design of the sheet or box structures planned for manufacture. For example, the structure module 110 may enable selection of the types of boxes (e.g., the material, number of layers, flute medium, etc.). Additionally, the size and shape of the sheet or box structure may be configured using the structure module 110. In some embodiments, preferred sheet or box structure specifications may be stored by the structure module 110. Further, rules or other constraints may be communicated to the customer and/or utilized in determination of the sheet or box structure specifications. The structure module 110 may communicate, for example, with the web interface module 105, the workflow module 115, and/or the graphics file management module 120.
The workflow module 115 may be configured to help process the flow of graphics orders and facilitate input of the orders into the structure module 110 and the graphics file management module 120. In this regard, the workflow module 115 may communicate with the web interface module 105, the structure module 110, and/or the graphics file management module 120.
The graphics file management module 120 may be configured to help process the graphics files for use in designing and printing on the sheet or box structures. For example, the graphics file management module 120 may include a repository of available images. Likewise, the graphics file management module 120 may store new images uploaded by the customer. Further, the graphics file management module 120 may include rules or other feature constraints that can be communicated to the customer and/or implemented when forming the orders. The graphics file management module 120 may communicate, for example, with the structure module 110, the workflow module 115, the management information system module 125, the color management module 148, and/or the imposition engine 130.
The management information system module 125 may be configured to store, process, and organize the information for the platform 100. For example, the management information systems module 125 is configured to receive and organize the orders, other customer requests, and internal information from the web interface module 105. Further, the data from the graphics file management module 120, imposition engine module 130, and ERP/corrugator planning module 165 may be stored and organized using the management information systems module 125. The management information systems module 125 may communicate, for example, with the web interface module 105, the graphics file management module 120, the imposition engine 130, and/or the ERP/corrugator planning module 165.
The enterprise resource planning (ERP)/corrugator planning module 165 may be configured to facilitate planning and implementation of the manufacturing process. In this regard, the ERP/corrugator planning module 165 may receive data from various features of the platform 100 and process the information to plan out efficient manufacturing processes across the entire platform. For example, the ERP/corrugator planning module 165 may receive data from the web interface module 105, the management information systems module 125, the press module 140, the vision system module 145, the corrugator controls module 160, and reel editor module 155 to inform planning for future jobs. As an example, the management information systems module 125 may provide order information to the ERP/corrugator planning module 165, which can be utilized to form job tickets for the imposition engine module 130. The ERP/corrugator planning module 165 may also be configured to enable printing of schedules for jobs etc.—which may be used for tracking or other purposes. Such information, for example, may be used to provide information back to the customer, such as through the web interface module 105. The ERP/corrugator planning module 165 may communicate, for example, with the web interface module 105, the management information systems module 125, the imposition engine module 130, the press module 140, the vision system module 145, the reel editor module 155, and/or the corrugator controls module 160.
The imposition engine module 130 may be configured to plan out imposition of print objects (e.g., images or markers) and other variable data on the corrugated board web (e.g., roll of web product). For example, the imposition engine module 130 may gather ready job tickets (e.g., customer orders), such as from the management information systems module 125 and/or ERP/corrugator planning module 165, for imposition across rolls of corrugated board web. Using the job tickets, the imposition engine module 130 may determine layouts for the corrugated board webs that minimize waste and improve processes. In order to plan out and finalize impositions, the imposition engine module 130 may receive information from various other modules, such as the graphics file management module 120, the variable data engine module 135, and the reel manifest module 150.
In some embodiments, the imposition engine module 130 may provide the ability to test roll layouts and finalize acceptable roll layouts. In this regard, formation of the layouts may be optimized based on many different factors, including, for example, roll/sheet/finished box requirements, press limitations, downstream corrugation, die-cut optimization, among other things. After finalization, the imposition engine module 130 may be configured to pass the imposed layout to the press module 140 for printing.
The imposition engine module 130 may communicate, for example, with the graphics file management module 120, the management information systems module 125, the ERP/corrugator planning module 165, the variable data engine module 135, the reel manifest module 155, and the press module 140.
The variable data engine module 135 may be configured to manage markers and other variable data through the manufacturing process. As described herein, some embodiments of the present invention contemplate use of markers for automated control during the manufacturing process, such for automated control/operation of the corrugator. Depending on the configuration of the manufacturing process, different markers or other variable data may be utilized to achieve automated control. The variable data engine module 135 may be configured to track, organize, determine, and report on such markers or other variable data.
In some embodiments, the variable data engine module 135 may be a web-based back-office function that assigns/allocates, references, and/or reports on variable data/marker information utilization. Such a module may enable generation and allocation of group (multi-use) individual barcodes, quick response (QR) codes, watermarks, color markers, and general variable data. In some embodiments, the variable data engine module 135 may assign/allocate variable data/markers by various entities, such as brand, product type, printer type, converter type, corrugator, logistics supply chain, or other factors.
In some embodiments, the variable data engine module 135 may transfer such information to the imposition engine module 130 for imposing on the board or web layout. In some embodiments, downstream information can be provided back to and utilized by the variable data engine module 135, such as information from the vision system module 145, reel editor module 155, corrugator, finishing equipment, logistics control, retailer, brand, and/or customer. Likewise, status updates can be provided to and from the variable data engine module 135.
In some embodiments, the data generated by the variable data engine module 135 may be tracked and utilized for reporting and determination of optimized processes. Further analytics and usage reporting may be generated. Along these lines, such information and learnings may be applicable to manufacturing of other products, such as also contemplated herein.
The variable data engine module 135 may communicate, for example, with the graphics file management module 120, the imposition engine module 130, the customer insights module 152, and the press module 140.
The press module 140 may be configured to print objects (e.g., images and markers) on the corrugated board or web, such as during the printing phase 30 described herein. Depending on capabilities of the press, different image qualities and efficiencies may be achieved. The press module 140 may be configured to communicate with, for example, the imposition engine module 130, the variable data engine module 135, the reel manifest module 150, the vision system module 145, and the color profiles module 148.
The color management module 148 may be configured to store and provide color profile information for the press module 140. In this regard, the color profiles module 148 may manage specific color profiles for customers, presses, substrates, or other requirements, that are then used by the press during printing. The color management module 148 may be configured to communicate with, for example, the graphics file management module 120 and the press module 140.
The vision system module 145 may be configured to perform many different types of vision (e.g., detection) related functions during the manufacturing process 10. In this regard, the vision system module 145 may be configured for use during the printing process and/or during use of the corrugator or other components of the manufacturing process. In describing such an example vision system module 145, some embodiments of the present invention contemplate separating described functions of the vision system module. For example, a portion of the vision system module 145 may be used during the printing process, while another portion of the vision system module 145 may be used in conjunction with operation of the corrugator. Likewise, there may be separate functions performed by separate vision system related components (e.g., a visual inspection system may inspect the sheet or box structures for accuracy and a detector may detect one or more markers). As such, though described as one module, the following description is not meant to limit the structure of the modules of the platform 10, as there may be separate vision related modules as appropriate.
The vision system module 145 may be configured to detect information during the manufacturing process, such as during use of the printing process. In some embodiments, the vision system module 145 may be configured to detect possible defects and/or confirm accuracy of print jobs. In such a regard, high quality can be maintained (e.g., confirming color consistency on orders). For example, the vision system module 145 may detect defects, such as serious banding, print registration color-to-color, spit-on-page issues, bar/QR code scanability, over-print varnish issues.
In some embodiments, the vision system module 145 may be configured to detect information during the manufacturing process 10, including during the printing phase 30, the reel editor phase 40, and/or during use of the corrugator 50. For example, the vision system module 145 may detect any defects or issues with the cuts or other functions of the corrugator. Additionally, the vision system module 145 may communicate potential issues in real time to the controller 90 to adjust operation of the corrugator to address any issues. By detecting and communicating such issues, the controller 90 may adapt operation to avoid unnecessary waste. Along these lines, in some embodiments, the controller 90 may work with the various modules of the platform 100 to switch production, such as to a different portion of a corrugator plan and/or associated reel map to avoid down time. In this regard, the vision system module 145 provides for the ability for on-the-fly adjustments during the manufacturing process.
In some embodiments, the vision system module 145 may be configured to detect various markers as the board web is passed through various phases of the manufacturing process. Based on the detected markers, the vision system module 145 may provide information to the controller 90 for operation/control accordingly. Further, such information can be used for tracking orders and status.
In some embodiments, photographs (e.g., digital images) can be taken and stored for evidence or additional learning. In some embodiments, the photographs could be automatically provided to the customer for verification and auditing purposes.
In some embodiments, the vision system module 145 is configured to update the graphics file management module 120 to store and/or access golden reference images for print quality comparison.
The vision system module 145 may be configured to communicate, for example, with the press module 140, the customer insights module 152, the reel manifest module 150, and/or the ERP/corrugator planning module 165.
The customer insights module 152 may be configured to determine insights that may be useful for obtaining efficiencies, such as for a customer. The insights may be related to, for example, trends for customers, trends that the customer may find desirable, suggestions for the customer for future orders, etc. Additionally or alternatively, the insights may be related to achieving efficiencies for preparing product for specific customers. For example, the customer may indicate that certain “defects” are not important or not really defects as recognized by the vision system module 145.
In some embodiments, the customer insights module 152 may track and utilize non-customer specific information, such as for determining general efficiencies of process. For example, the module may track variable data/marker usage, reel map trends and usages, printer data, print head usage, paper waste, etc., such as to help form insights to increase efficient manufacturing processes.
The customer insights module 152 may be configured to communicate with, for example, the variable data engine 135, the vision system module 145, and/or the reel manifest module 150.
The reel manifest module 150 may be configured to store and/or track the process flow (e.g., reel map) for the manufacturing process. The reel manifest module 150 works with the imposition engine module 130 to store the job layouts for operation of the corrugator. The reel manifest 150 may be checked, such as by the controller 90 and/or corrugator controls module 160, to help determine the current position on a reel map—such as in response to receiving a detection (e.g., a marker or a defect) from the vision system module 145. Further, the corresponding information needed to operate the corrugator according to the reel map may be stored at the reel manifest module 150 and provided to the controller 90/corrugator controls module 160 so that the controller 90/corrugator controls module 160 may operate the corrugator accordingly. The reel manifest module 150 may work with the reel editor module 155 to edit the reel map in real time, such as described herein. The reel manifest module 150 may be configured to communicate with, for example, the customer insights module 152, the imposition engine module 130, the press module 140, the vision system module 145, the corrugator controls module 160, and/or the reel editor module 155.
The reel editor module 155 may be configured to enable editing of the process flow, such as the reel map. In this regard, in some embodiments, the reel editor module 155 interacts with the reel manifest module 150 to update the stored reel map. In some embodiments, the reel editor module 155 may work with the vision system module 145 to identify unnecessary waste, which can be edited from the reel map, such as based on instructions for the controller 90. Such example information can also be provided to the ERP/corrugator planning module 165 to update the reel map and/or for consideration in future jobs. The reel editor module 155 may be configured to communicate, for example, with the reel manifest module 150, the vision system module 145, and the ERP/corrugator planning module 165.
The corrugator controls module 160 may be configured to control operation of the corrugator, such as described herein. In some embodiments, the corrugator controls module 160 may work with one or more cameras/detectors to detect information (e.g., markers or defects) that can be used to control/adjust operation of the corrugator. For example, the cameras/detectors may detect a marker and the corrugator controls module 160 may determine how to operate the corrugator based on the detected marker (and/or the corresponding position of the reel map). Then, based on the determined desired operations, the corrugator controls module 160 may cause operation of the corrugator. For example, the corrugator controls module 160 may cause one or more knives to change position and/or perform a cut. Additional information regarding contemplated control through detection of markers is provided in greater detail herein. The corrugator controls module 160 may be configured to communicate with, for example, the reel manifest module 150, the vision system module 145, and the ERP/corrugator planning module 165.
In some embodiments, other components/machines and their corresponding controls may replace the corrugator, such as components/machines geared toward manufacturing other products.
As noted herein, some embodiments contemplate systems for controlling manufacturing of various products, such as various paper-based products, including corrugated boxes, folded carton, labels, flexible paper, industrial bags, plates, cups, décor, and many others.
In some embodiments, like the manufacturing process 10 described with respect to
In some embodiments, the folded carton manufacturing process 710 may include one or more unique devices, such as a folding/gluing device 775 that may form part of the finishing phase 770 (or the sheet formation/processing phase 760). The folding/gluing device 775, such as using one or more folding arms or other hardware and/or various software, may be configured to perform one or more folds of various sheets to form the desired folded carton. In some embodiments, the folding device 775 may be configured to apply glue separately or in addition to performing the one or more folds.
In some embodiments, like the manufacturing process 10 described with respect to
In some embodiments, the industrial bag manufacturing process 810 may include one or more unique devices, such as a tuber device 872 and/or bottom device 874 that may form part of the finishing phase 870 (or the sheet formation/processing phase 860). The tuber device 872, such as using various hardware and/or software, may be configured to form one or more sheets into one or more tubes. The bottom device 874, such as using various hardware and/or software, may be configured to form a bottom on each of the tubes to form the industrial bag.
In some embodiments, like the manufacturing process 10 described with respect to
In some embodiments, the cup manufacturing process 910 may include one or more unique devices, such as a cup former 977 that may form part of the finishing phase 970 (or the sheet formation/processing phase 960). The cup former 977, such as using various hardware and/or software, may be configured to form one or more sheets (or structures) into a cup with a desired shape (e.g., the cup former 977 may employ a die-cutter that cuts the sheet into a desired shape and a cup formation device that forms the cylindrical cup shape with a bottom and glues the cup together).
In some embodiments, like the manufacturing process 10 described with respect to
In some embodiments, the paper plate manufacturing process 1010 may include one or more unique devices, such as a plate former 1078 that may form part of the finishing phase 1070 (or the sheet formation/processing phase 1060). The plate former 1078, such as using various hardware and/or software, may be configured to form one or more sheets (or structures) into a plate with a desired shape (e.g., the plate former 1078 may have a stamping device that stamps the sheet into a desired shape).
Although the above description notes one or more distinctions between the various manufacturing processes 710, 810, 910, 1010 and the manufacturing process 10, other distinctions are contemplated by some embodiments of the present invention. For example, the tracking/logistics phase for each manufacturing process may be different or employ different techniques that allow for efficient manufacturing of the end product. Whether the same or different, various tracking/marking/detecting techniques described herein may be employed with manufacturing of such example products to provide for an efficient manufacturing process.
Embodiments of the present invention provide methods, apparatuses and computer program products for controlling and operating the corrugator for manufacturing sheet or box structures according to various embodiments described herein. Various examples of the operations performed in accordance with embodiments of the present invention will now be provided with reference to
The method 600 may include creating and/or determining a corrugator plan/reel map at operation 602. At operation 604, the method comprises operating the corrugator (and its various components) according to a first set of order instructions in the corrugator plan. Upon detecting a color marker (or other marking indicating an order change, such as a QR code, bar code, etc.) at operation 606, the method comprises, at operation 608, determining whether an order change occurred. Then, at operation 610, the method comprises obtaining a second set of order instructions from the corrugator plan in an instance in which an order change is determined to have occurred. At operation 612, the method comprises operating the corrugator according to the second set of order instructions.
The method 650 may include, at operation 652, detecting a current position of a corrugator plan/reel map by detecting one or more readable markers and referencing the position using the corrugator plan/reel map. At operation 654, the theoretical position of the corrugator plan/reel map is determined, where the theoretical position is the scheduled position that the corrugator is currently operating at. At operation 656, a representation of the current position and a representation of the theoretical position are displayed for comparison by an operator. In some embodiments, at operation 658, the controller may determine one or more differences between the current position and the theoretical position. At operation 660, in some embodiments, one or more indications of the differences may be provided to an operator, such as by highlighting the differences. At operation 662, in some embodiments, a remedy may be applied, such as through use of an emergency stop and/or through changing operational control of the corrugator.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein may come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these inventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the embodiments of the invention are not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the invention. Moreover, although the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings describe example embodiments in the context of certain example combinations of elements and/or functions, it should be appreciated that different combinations of elements and/or functions may be provided by alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. In this regard, for example, different combinations of elements and/or functions than those explicitly described above are also contemplated within the scope of the invention. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/597,005, entitled “Controls for Paper, Sheet, and Box Manufacturing Systems”, filed Dec. 11, 2017; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/583,853, entitled “Controls for Paper, Sheet, and Box Manufacturing Systems”, filed Nov. 9, 2017; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/532,483, entitled “Digital Pre-Print Paper, Sheet, and Box Manufacturing Systems”, filed Jul. 14, 2017, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2318937 | Goldney et al. | May 1943 | A |
3058869 | Cohen et al. | Oct 1962 | A |
3667252 | Nelson | Jun 1972 | A |
3667353 | Ward, Jr. et al. | Jun 1972 | A |
3667354 | Steinmetz | Jun 1972 | A |
4086120 | Cosby et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4287797 | Seragnoli | Sep 1981 | A |
4387614 | Evans | Jun 1983 | A |
4415978 | Craemer | Nov 1983 | A |
4545780 | Martin | Oct 1985 | A |
4576663 | Bory | Mar 1986 | A |
4604083 | Barny et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4737904 | Ominato | Apr 1988 | A |
4847775 | Roch | Jul 1989 | A |
5117610 | Hartman et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5325306 | Adachi et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5458062 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5705020 | Chiari | Jan 1998 | A |
5727748 | Prittie | Mar 1998 | A |
5802974 | McNeil | Sep 1998 | A |
5816994 | Hil et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822208 | Bory | Oct 1998 | A |
5899128 | Smithe | May 1999 | A |
5918519 | Schnabel et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926825 | Shirakawa | Jul 1999 | A |
6070396 | Rinaldi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6112658 | Gunther et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125374 | Terry et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6149565 | Meyer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6170881 | Salmon et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188490 | Miyake | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6207242 | Hoffman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6234943 | Copin | May 2001 | B1 |
6299730 | Broek et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6352497 | Hensley et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378862 | Rebeaud | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6450381 | Ernst et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473760 | Klatt et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6481709 | Gombau et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6496219 | Porret et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6499397 | Stern | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6606947 | Frossard et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6650433 | Keane et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6725123 | Denuell | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6771384 | Laverty et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6791707 | Laverty et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6821038 | Izawa | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6893520 | Cummings | May 2005 | B2 |
6934046 | Nishikawa et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6976798 | Keane et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6992794 | Keane et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7009723 | Bartholet et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7073444 | Alonso et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7093540 | Giancaterino et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114444 | Hutchinson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133149 | Keane et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145670 | Keane et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7154627 | Nishikawa et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7182007 | Berge et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187465 | Keane et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7187472 | Friedman et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7187995 | Floeder et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7242463 | Pilloud et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7297969 | Wolinsky et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7307749 | Nishikawa et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7398733 | De Vries et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7469872 | Compagnone et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7495796 | Keane et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7542155 | Paskalev et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7726899 | Clement | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7832441 | Titz | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7855799 | Shah | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7871479 | Garland | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7949566 | Fogelson | May 2011 | B2 |
8009308 | Field | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8030013 | Llovet et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8045147 | Toma et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8059290 | Kuroshima | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8060234 | Hellstrom et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8175739 | Floeder et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8241454 | Kraus et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8270007 | Pandit et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8310696 | Gustafson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8390872 | Abe et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8418614 | Whitelaw et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8464638 | Whiltelaw et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8482766 | Greene et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8488144 | Fujimori et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8520254 | Rai | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8531721 | Minagawa | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8534194 | Whitelaw et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8630013 | Minagawa | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634089 | Keane et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634731 | Has et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8732003 | Keane et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8733222 | Borel et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8757479 | Clark et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8783144 | Compagnone et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8817324 | Giannetti et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8834334 | Palm et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8842313 | Harrington | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8887637 | Huber et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8891126 | Tufano | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8931410 | Noy | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9056515 | Wingkono et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9073720 | Beguin et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9108382 | Gnan et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9132599 | Bober | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9152362 | Keane et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9278555 | Torihara et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9298404 | Niblett, Jr. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9298706 | Magnell | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9325860 | Lachajewski et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9327421 | Beguin | May 2016 | B2 |
9327485 | Mann et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9340007 | D'Annunzio et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9361550 | Barros et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9481537 | Beguin et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9518362 | Bomstad et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9539828 | Yasinover et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9645774 | Keane et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9663261 | Azad et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9898232 | Has et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9904494 | Ujike | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10576650 | Bayer et al. | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20020014577 | Ulrich | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020062751 | Bardet et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020078847 | Bardet et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020083857 | Bardet et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020197091 | Otsuki | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030149747 | Rai et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040041991 | Obertegger | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040042022 | Friedman et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040150856 | Asai | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040182503 | Stadele | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182504 | Stadele et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211330 | Clark et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211510 | Joseph, Sr. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050000842 | Timmerman et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050044550 | Perdu | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050085362 | Hutchinson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050141760 | Floeder et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050209075 | Kocherga et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050247173 | Alsten et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060027303 | Hunter | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060090319 | Howe | May 2006 | A1 |
20060148631 | Protocsnak et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060222429 | Kurashina | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060257014 | Oi | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070120357 | Kapadi et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070162326 | Weel et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070175350 | Crum | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070289460 | Tang | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080075488 | Moriyama et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080239381 | Oshima | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080273224 | Maulsby et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080308215 | Kraus et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080308251 | Weyer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090025002 | Rai | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090080022 | Tsutsumi | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090120563 | Titz | May 2009 | A1 |
20090217835 | Rozenblum | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090218380 | Prittie | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090243204 | Breunig et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090262159 | Lang | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110122212 | Pettersson et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110149337 | Goetz et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120019866 | Kuroshima | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120053039 | Compagnone et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120148326 | Ipponyari et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120250047 | Prati | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130029825 | Rich | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130094033 | Giannetti et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130139959 | Wang | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130141763 | Giannetti et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130184133 | Sugimoto et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130184134 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130203579 | Vermunt | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130209750 | Van Berlo | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130286410 | Yasinover et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140000785 | Gnan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140067104 | Osterhout | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140162862 | Shimura et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140182470 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140251170 | Chiari et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274643 | Clark et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140293297 | Nagahara | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140297357 | Zeng et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140376043 | Tsujita | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150022845 | Roscoe et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150090140 | Rancourt | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150101740 | Morales Garcia de la Vega et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150115976 | Adams et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150221077 | Kawabata et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150291382 | Moh | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150292155 | Bomstad et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160004249 | Cummings et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160008998 | Denisse et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160016324 | Bapst et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160121572 | Giancaterino | May 2016 | A1 |
20160231966 | Ujike | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160286064 | Numao et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160306595 | Has et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160318297 | Whitelaw et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160361886 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170043570 | Bastici et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170057771 | Clement | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170087793 | Mark et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170087794 | Bayer et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170087879 | Mark | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170180598 | Nagahara | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170308335 | Keane et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170344316 | Keane et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180000842 | Dhuppad et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180009616 | Kodama et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180037037 | Takagi et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180200906 | Senoco | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180215061 | Bayer et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180250971 | Singla et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180253263 | Hower et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180345619 | Lang et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190016551 | Seay et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190018628 | Sloan et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190018629 | Seay et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190024315 | Bomstad et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190084266 | Grünwald et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190193368 | Eder et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20200114668 | Havive et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1215568 | Dec 1986 | CA |
2152003 | Dec 1995 | CA |
2398171 | Aug 2001 | CA |
101124528 | Feb 2008 | CN |
201030576 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101219723 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101977777 | Feb 2011 | CN |
102173162 | Sep 2011 | CN |
103286812 | Sep 2013 | CN |
203307684 | Nov 2013 | CN |
103465509 | Dec 2013 | CN |
103879026 | Jun 2014 | CN |
203919153 | Nov 2014 | CN |
106363962 | Feb 2017 | CN |
0875482 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0972639 | Jan 2000 | EP |
0983853 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1132203 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1243414 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1 459 878 BI | Sep 2004 | EP |
1459878 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1593502 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1 655 116 | May 2006 | EP |
1916102 | Apr 2008 | EP |
1956456 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2100732 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2227396 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2250019 | Nov 2010 | EP |
2298552 | Mar 2011 | EP |
2428360 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2429781 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2429782 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2551117 | Jan 2013 | EP |
2611614 | Aug 2014 | EP |
2928651 | Oct 2015 | EP |
2964436 | Jan 2016 | EP |
3010717 | Feb 2017 | EP |
2102769 | Feb 1983 | GB |
2542569 | Mar 2017 | GB |
2542645 | Mar 2017 | GB |
S62-290527 | Dec 1987 | JP |
H07137720 | May 1995 | JP |
H1165814 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2000118797 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000153802 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2002113971 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002233990 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-273800 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002304426 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-245894 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-82279 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2007-245257 | Sep 2007 | JP |
2009154229 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2010158902 | Jul 2010 | JP |
4718981 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2012139952 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2015157375 | Sep 2015 | JP |
2015217535 | Dec 2015 | JP |
2016154008 | Aug 2016 | JP |
2017-035755 | Feb 2017 | JP |
2010-0138218 | Dec 2010 | KR |
10-1102628 | Jan 2012 | KR |
10-1518219 | May 2015 | KR |
M271837 | Aug 2005 | TW |
2009014818 | Jan 2009 | WO |
WO 2012065689 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2014023487 | Feb 2014 | WO |
WO 2014206496 | Dec 2014 | WO |
WO 2016087053 | Jun 2016 | WO |
WO 2016165774 | Oct 2016 | WO |
WO 2017026135 | Feb 2017 | WO |
WO 2017051146 | Mar 2017 | WO |
WO 2017131720 | Aug 2017 | WO |
WO 2017178228 | Oct 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2018/041988, dated Nov. 7, 2018, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2018/041990, dated Nov. 7, 2018, 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2018/041992, dated Jan. 21, 2019, 20 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2018/042000, dated Nov. 7, 2018, 10 pages. |
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees and, Where Applicable, Protest Fee, PCT/US2018/041992, dated Nov. 28, 2018, 15 pages. |
BHS Corrugator 4.0 Presentation (ICCA, Apr. 2015) 13 pages. |
Chang et al., Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, “Simulation-Based Scheduling Dynamic Discrete Manufacturing”, retrieved from <https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chin_Chong/publication/4053706_Dynamic_scheduling_I_simulation-based_scheduling_for_dynamic_discrete_manufacturing/links/0deec52a5c1c8a0a56000000/Dynamic-scheduling-I-simulation-based-scheduling-for-dynamic-discrete-manufacturing.pdf> 10 pages. |
Lehtonen et al., Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, “Simulation-Based Finite Scheduling at Albany International”, retrieved from <https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/71ab/4037976abb74e3874a158892e24254044970.pdf> 7 pages. |
HP Development Company; “Reinventing End-to-end Solutions with HP and Our Partners”, Product Brochure, Published 2016, 24 pages. |
Office Action received for CN Application No. 201880037361.X. dated Feb. 26, 2021, 33 Pages. (19 Pages of English Translation and 14 Pages of Official Notification). |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal received for JP application No. 2020-500729, dated Jun. 7, 2022, 8 pages. (4 pages of english translation and 4 pages of official copy). |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal received for JP application No. 2020-500840, dated Jun. 14, 2022, 12 pages. (6 pages of english translation and 6 pages of official copy). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190016081 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62597005 | Dec 2017 | US | |
62583853 | Nov 2017 | US | |
62532483 | Jul 2017 | US |