The present invention relates to envelopes that are sent as a first size envelope and returned as a second smaller size envelopes making the returned envelope more compatible for remittance machines. The present invention also provides envelopes having a security tab and/or bridge structure formed by removing a tear strip on the front of the envelope allowing access into the envelope.
Envelopes of conventional sizes, such as, a 9″×12″ or a 6″×9″ or 4.5″×9.25″ are typically not used for sending transactional mail to a lock box or remittance center when a customer sends a payment or a direct mail solicitation reply by mail. For statement mail used by phone companies or energy companies who send several statement pages to each customer, a smaller businesses size envelope is not large enough and a larger size envelope referred to as a flat or half flat size envelope is typically used. Included in a mailing such as described, a separate reply envelope for the customer to return their payment to complete the transaction is included in the mailing. The main reason a reply envelope is added is because the larger envelopes are not the appropriate size for most high-speed remittance equipment. The reply envelope is only needed for remittance and adds costs because it is a separate envelope that needs to be manufactured, printed, shipped, stored, and inserted. Generally when a customer sends a payment for a bill or invoice by mail they send a payment coupon with their check in the reply envelope. A larger envelope that can carry multiple pages on the outgoing mailing is not required for the return when a single check and coupon are returned. For this purpose a smaller envelope is sufficient. In addition, a smaller reply envelope fits the optimal size requirements for remittance equipment, allowing the most efficiencies and cost savings for returned mail. A majority of mail that is returned for paying a bill or responding to a solicitation is what is referred to as a No. 9 envelope or reply envelope and is a standard size of approximately 8.625×3.875 inches. Because there is a general conformity for this size envelope as the standard reply envelope size, companies responsible for collecting and process the return mail optimize their machines to this standard size for speed, accuracy and reporting. Sizes outside the standard size can slow the process down, costing companies extra money in processing and delaying payment from the customer. Thus a larger envelope for the outgoing is not optimal for remittance and a smaller reply size helps to ensure on time banking and payment.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a larger size envelope for sending the mail and a smaller size envelope for remittance that are functionally combined into one envelope. A larger envelope is used to send multiple page documents and a smaller envelope is used to return the remittance statement and the payment. Thus, according to the present invention a large envelope is uniquely converted down to a smaller remittance size envelope for the return.
According to the present invention, only one envelope instead of two envelopes is required for both sending and returning, instead of one large envelope and one smaller envelope provided within the large envelope. This unique design can be applied to all sizes of envelopes and is not limited to any particular size of envelope. Converting a larger envelope to a smaller return envelope in accordance with the present invention saves money, natural resources, and is a unique way to send statements and direct mail that require a return mailing.
Additionally, conversion envelopes in accordance with the present invention include a simple method for removing barcodes commonly sprayed on the front lower right corner and the back lower left corner of letter size mail. By removing an opening strip on the front and by removing the lower portion of the envelope, both the front and the back barcodes can be removed at the same time. Envelopes and related methods of managing removal and/or obscuring of such barcodes are also described in Applicant's copending non-provisional patent application publication No. 2008/0041928, having Ser. No. 11/893,562, entitled Reusable Envelope Structures and Methods, filed on Feb. 24, 2005, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this disclosure, illustrate several aspects of the present invention and together with description of the exemplary embodiments serve to explain the principles of the present invention.
The exemplary embodiments of the present invention described herein are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the precise forms disclosed in the following detailed description. Rather the exemplary embodiments described herein are chosen and described so those skilled in the art can appreciate and understand the principles and practices of the present invention.
The present invention provides a unique way to convert a first mailing envelope such as a 6″×9″ size envelope 10 to a smaller reply envelope 80 that is compatible with remittance processing for managing reply mail for statement mail and direct mail. Unique in this approach is the removal of a section of both left 11 and right 12 side seams to form part of the reply envelope seal flap 61. When a recipient receives envelope 10, the recipient lifts a tab 13 and tears a section 14 of the front panel 15 along parallel perforations 16, 17 to open the envelope. The perforated opening strip 14 is connected to a section of the side seam 32 when the opening strip is pulled off. After perforated strip 14 has been pulled off a bridge portion 18 and the bottom edge with a lip 19 is created. The bridge portion 18 and bottom edge lip 19 are part of the lower portion 20 of front panel 15 of the envelope. The original seal flap 30 is attached to the lower portion 21 of the back panel 51 on the bottom.
In accordance with the present invention the bridge 18 and lip 19 function uniquely to keep the contents of envelope 10 from falling out if opening strip 14 is accidentally removed in the mail processing or delivery. The bridge portion 18 is also connected to a section of side seam 11 opposite from the section of the side seam 12 removed by opening strip 14. After envelope 10 is opened and the contents 40 are lifted out, smaller reply envelope 80 is created from the original larger envelope 10 by tearing the lower portion 20 of envelope 10 along a perforation 50 in the back panel 51 visible from the inside when contents 40 are removed. Removing the lower portion 20 by tearing along the perforation 50 in back panel 51 removes bottom edge lip 19, bridge portion 18 and the side seam section 35 connected to bridge portion 18, as well as the original seal flap 30 attached to the lower portion 21 of back panel 51. Removing both sections of the side seams 32, 35 forms the edges of the reply envelope seal flap 61. Removing the lower portion 20 of the original envelope 10 forms the edge of seal flap 61 for sealing the reply envelope 80 for the return trip.
When the lower portion 20 is released from envelope 10, what remains is the smaller reply envelope 80 with a seal flap 61 on the bottom, the original window 4, and the upper section 63 of the original pocket 31 of the envelope 10. To resend the new converted reply envelope 80, seal flap 61 is folded up and attached to front panel 15. In addition, by removing the lower portion 20 of the envelope, barcodes 70 the USPS may spray on the envelope are uniquely removed both on the front lower portion 20 and the back lower portion 21 of the envelope, preventing the newly created reply envelope 80 from looping.
Generally when a customer sends a payment for a bill or invoice by mail they send a payment coupon with their check in a reply envelope included with the statement. A larger envelope such as a 6×9 or 9×12 that can carry multiple statement pages is often used for statement mail. In this case, a larger outgoing envelope is too large to return only a coupon and check and the larger size does not fit most remittance technology. For remittance of a coupon and payment a smaller reply envelope is an optimal size requirements for remittance equipment, allowing the highest efficiencies and cost savings for processing reply mail.
Most mail that is returned for paying a bill or responding to a solicitation generally uses a No. 9 size reply envelope for which the standard size is approximately 9×4⅛″ inches. Because there is a general conformity for this size envelope as the standard reply envelope size, companies responsible for collecting and processing the return mail optimize their machines to a standard size for speed, accuracy, and reporting of payments collected. Sizes outside a standard size slow the process down, costing companies extra money in processing and sometimes delaying payment from the customer. Thus, a larger envelope for the outgoing envelope is not optimal for remittance and a smaller reply size is desirable to ensure on-time banking and payment.
In accordance with the present invention, a larger size envelope for sending mail such as statements and the like and a smaller size envelope for remittance are combined into one envelope. In this way only one reusable conversion envelope instead of two envelopes is needed. Converting a larger envelope to a smaller return envelope saves money, natural resources, and is a unique way to send statements and direct mail that require a return mailing. In addition, the present reusable conversion envelope does not disrupt mailing processes because, when the envelope is converted, it fits the specifications for remittance technology.
Conventionally, whenever a large envelope is sent through the mail with a portion or all the contents to be returned, a second envelope is placed in the originating envelope and used for returning a payment or other contents as prescribed. The method of sending and returning contents of mail is common. Also common is a reply envelope included with mail for customers to return a portion or all of the contents of the original mailing. Statement mail has an outer envelope and a reply envelope and is an example of this type of mailing. It is also known that sending a separate reply envelope prevents mail from looping back to the sender if the USPS sprays barcodes on the front and back of the originating envelope.
Reply envelopes typically used for sending return mail such as statement coupons are designed to be a certain size to fit inside a carrier envelope and to run efficiently on remittance machines such as OPEX 1500 machines. Conforming to a specific size for reply mail for large statement mailers or direct mailers allows the process of acceptance of return mail to be uninterrupted, saving time and resources for receiving and banking payments or payment for fulfillment of an order. When statement mailers mail multiple page statements, a larger size envelope is required. For remittance in such a case a smaller envelope is added at an extra cost to the mailer. Having the correct size envelope for remittance keeps the remittance process—a time sensitive process—efficient and keeps cost down. This is an important consideration for companies to determine revenue and record the customer payment. For this reason, envelopes compatible with current remittance technology and reducing costs are critical. A conversion envelope that originates as a larger envelope for outgoing mail that converts to a smaller reply envelope for the return that is compatible with remittance technology and saves the cost of a reply envelope is desirable because such envelopes saves time, money, and reduces the amount of paper needed to send transactional mail.
Conventional envelope manufacturing die cuts an envelope shape from sheets or webs of paper. The cut out envelope shape is referred to as the flat. The flat is folded to create a pocket with a closure device. Generally there is a front panel, back panel, two side seams, generally one on the right and one on the left, and a remoistened or adhesive seal flap that extends from either the front or the back panel that folds over the opening and attaches to the opposite panel to close the envelope. To create an envelope, the back panel and front panel are folded together, the side seams are folded and glued to the back panel to create the pocket and the seal flap extends beyond the opening attaching either the front or the back panel.
Envelopes in accordance with the present invention include a front panel 15 and a back panel 51. Extensions of front panel 15 include side seams on the right 12 and the left 11 and a seal flap 30 extending from the bottom of the front panel 15. Preferably, envelopes of the present invention have the opening 31 of the envelope at the bottom. In accordance with the present invention, side seams 11, 12 are glued to back panel 51 with the exception of a section that is defined by parallel perforations 33, 36 on both the right and left side seams 11, 12. The unglued section of side seams 32, 35 are in the same location on the left and right sides. As described below, when the unglued sections 33, 36 of the side seams sections on both sides of the envelope are removed, the reply envelope seal strip 61 left and right sides are defined. All other sections of the side seams 11, 12 on the left and right are glued to back panel 50 to create the pocket 31 of the envelope.
In accordance with the present invention, the side seam sections 32,35 that are removed could have been die cut during the stage when the envelope shape is cut out during manufacturing. In high speed inserting it is critical there are no opportunities for materials to get caught on edges or openings resulting in jams or slow downs. By leaving the unglued sections in the two side seams the possibility of materials getting caught in the edges of the side seam when the envelope is inserted is eliminated. If the side seam sections were cut out, edges from the cuts could catch inserted materials, causing a jam on high speed inserting equipment. Having the side seam function as one continuous side seam keeps the design within acceptable specification for high speed inserting. The sections that are not glued 32, 35 and are perforated 33, 36 do not interfere with the inserting process and are uniquely designed to be easily removed in the process of opening the envelope and when the lower portion of the envelope is removed forming the reply envelope as described in this patent. Having the side seam function as one continuous side seam is a very important feature for high speed inserting because it reduces the possibility of materials getting caught when inserted. In addition, removing the side seam sections is an important feature for converting a larger envelope to a smaller reply envelope as described herein.
Most conventional envelopes have the opening to the pocket of the envelope at the top. The seal flap folds from the front panel over the opening at the top and attaches on the back panel of the envelope. In accordance with the present invention the opening to pocket 31 is on the bottom and seal flap 30 also on the bottom folds over the opening and attaches to the lower portion of back panel 51. The front of the envelope is similar to other reusable envelopes and has a window 4, FIM 28 (Facing Identification Mark allowed by the USPS on outgoing presorted mail for reusable envelopes. SEE Postal Bulletin February 2007). The window shows the address 22 block with a barcode 23 and postage indicia 24 printed on the insert 40. The USPS allows postage included in the address block for outgoing presort mail using a barcode address. No postage is printed or applied to the originating envelope when the postage is in the address block. Having the postage in the address block showing through the window leaves the postage area (upper right corner) 25 on the envelope available for postage when the envelope is mailed a second time. These methods are conventional for reusable envelopes and are approved by the USPS.
On the back panel 51 of the current invention, unlike other reusable envelopes, are a score line 52 and a perforation 50 parallel to each other that extend the length of envelope 10. Score line 52 defines the height of reply envelope 80 after envelope 80 is converted from original envelope 10. The height of reply envelope 80 is measured from the score line to the parallel edge 53 of the envelope. The perforation 50 on the back panel will become the edge of the reply envelope seal flap 61 as described below. The back panel perforation 50 will be used to tear the upper 63 and lower portions 20, 21 of the envelope apart from each other to create smaller reply envelope 80 from original larger envelope 10. The distance between score line 52 and perforation 50 on back panel 51 determines the height of seal flap 61 for resealing envelope 80 when sent as a reply envelope. For example, if the distance between score line 52 and perforation 50 is ⅝″, then seal flap 61 is ⅝″ high. Score line 52 will be the fold line for the seal flap 61 of reply envelope 80. Score line 52 is positioned to define the height of a conventional reply envelope for remittance machines, approximately 4⅛″ high. The lower portion 20, 21 of envelope 10 is removed by tearing along back panel perforation 50 and includes the lower portion 20 of the front of the envelope and the lower portion of back 21 of the envelope. The lower portion 20 of the front of envelope 10 includes the security bridge 18 portion on front panel 15 connecting the upper portion 63 and the lower portion 20, 21, including a bottom lip 19 of envelope 10 that securely holds the contents 40 in place until intentionally removed by the recipient. The lower portion of the back 21 of the envelope includes the original seal flap 30. When the lower portion 20, 21 of the envelope is torn along the back panel perforation 50 it removes the original seal flap 30 on back panel 51.
In accordance with the present invention, front panel 15 has a tab 13 that is used for lifting a strip 14 with parallel-perforated lines 16,17 that opens the envelope. The perforated opening strip 14 on front panel 15, when removed, removes a section 32 of side seam 12 that is not glued as described above. The section of side seam 12 removed is defined by two parallel lines of perforations 33, 16 in the side seam and is an extension of the perforated opening strip 14 from front panel 15. For purpose of illustration, section 32 of side seam 12 is removed with the perforated opening strip 14 on the right side, but can be located and removed from either the right or the left side. This section 32 is not glued to back pane 51 and has parallel perforations 33 allowing section 32 to be easily removed. The size of section 32 removed is directly related to the size of the second seal flap 61 for sealing reply envelope 80. For example, if the second seal strip is ⅝″ wide then the section 32 of the side seam removed is ⅝″ wide. Perforated opening strip 14 for opening the envelope can be larger or smaller than the section of the side seam that is removed but in all cases the perforated opening strip 14 and the side seam 32 are considered one piece originating as part of the front panel 15. In addition, removing perforated opening strip 14 on front panel 15 defines the security bridge portion 18 on front panel 15 and a lip 19 along the bottom edge.
Security of personal information is very important to the public. When sending statements companies take extra measures to protect personal information. Often there is a security tint printed on the inside of the envelope for this purpose.
A unique feature of the present invention is the described security bridge portion 18 and bottom lip 19 created when the perforated opening strip 14 for opening the envelope is removed. The bridge portion 18 and the lip 19 prevent contents 40 of the envelope from prematurely falling out if the opening is accidentally removed in mail processing or mail delivery. For purposes of illustration, bridge 18 will be described on the left side but can be on either the right side or the left, top or bottom. Bottom lip 19 for purposes of illustration will be on the bottom but can be on any side of the envelope.
Bridge section 18 connects to the upper portion 63 of envelope 10 having window 4 and pocket 31 formed by front 15 and back 53 panel and glued side seams 11, 12. The bottom edge of envelope 10 is what remains along the bottom edge when perforated opening strip 14 is removed from front panel 15. Both bridge portion 18 and bottom edge or lip 19 are parts of the lower portion 20 of envelope 10.
As an example, an extension of perforation 27 at the top of the perforated opening strip 14 extends to the top of bridge section 18 continuing to approximately ¼″ from the edge of the envelope. In this exemplary embodiment, perforation 27 extends to ¼″ from the left edge of the envelope.
Having perforation 27 along the top of bridge 18 terminating some distance from the left edge of the envelope prevents a weakened edge at that point along the side of the envelope that can possibly cause premature tearing in mail processing. The perforation 27 at the top of bridge section 18 extends into side seam 11 becoming the top perforation for the section 35 of side seam 11 that is removed. The bridge portion 18, like perforation opening strip 14, is connected to section 35 of side seam 11 only on the left side, but could be on either side. Like perforated opening strip 14, bridge portion 18 and side seam 35 are considered one piece originating as part of the front panel. Bridge portion 18 also connects the lower portion 20 of the envelope remaining after the perforated opening strip 14 is removed. Perforation 27 at the top of bridge 18 divides the upper portion 63 and lower portions 20, 21 of the envelope. Above perforation 27 is the upper portion 63. Below the perforation 27 including the bridge 18 is part of the lower portion 21 of the back of the envelope. The lower portion 21 of the back of the envelope has the original seal strip 30 attached to it. The lower portion 21 of the back 51 of envelope 10 is defined by a perforation 50 that extends the width of the envelope. Parallel to the perforation on the back panel 50 is a score line 52 also extending the width of the envelope. The perforation 50 and score line 52 form the top edge (perforation) and the fold line (score) for the second seal flap 61 when the envelope has been converted to send as a reply envelope 80. The perforation 50 also functions to separate upper portion 63, including front 15 and back 51, from the lower portion 20 front 15 and back 51 of the envelope to create the smaller reply envelope 80. When the lower portion 20 of the envelope is removed, the perforation 27 at the top of bridge portion 18 is torn, releasing bridge portion 18 from front panel 15 and thereby allowing lower portion 20 to be completely separated from envelope 10.
As illustrated, on back panel 51 is a score line 52 and a perforated line 50 parallel to each other extending across the width of the envelope. After the envelope is open by the perforated opening strip 14 on the front panel 15, the recipient can remove contents 40. When the contents are removed, the score line 52 and perforated line 50 on back panel 51 are visible from the inside of the envelope. Now visible between score line 52 and perforated line 50 on the inside is a glue strip 61 used for resealing the envelope a second time when the smaller reply envelope is returned. Glue strip 61 will remain part of the envelope body when the lower portion of the envelope 21 is removed. Glue strip 61 will function to seal the envelope to send the envelope a second time.
Removing perforated opening strip 14 reveals a portion of the contents 40 of the envelope. In some instances a marketing message 41 could be positioned in the opening that promotes a special offer or delivers an important message to the customer in an impactful manner. When the envelope is opened in the manner described, the inserted contents 40 can be removed by lifting over lip 19 on the bottom edge. Because lip 19 is at the bottom and the inserted material does not slide out, the present invention requires the material be lifted out over lip 19 at the bottom edge through the opening created by perforated opening strip 14. When the contents are lifted out of the envelope the second seal strip 61 is visible in the back panel 51 as described above.
To manifest the reply envelope the lower portion 20,21 of the envelope is torn along perforation 50 in back panel 51. Tearing the lower portion 20,21 is accomplished by grasping the corner of the front bottom edge and tearing along the back panel perforation 50. Tearing off the lower portion 20, 21 removes the bridge portion 18 along perforation 27 at the top of the bridge. Removing the bridge portion 18 removes the left section of side seam 35 and completely separates the lower portion 20, 21 from the upper envelope body 63. What remains is the newly formed reply envelope 80 with the second seal strip 61 on the bottom and the upper portion of the original envelope 63. The upper portion 63 has the original window 4, a pocket 81 formed by the remaining front panel 15 and back panel 51 and has the right and left side seams 11,12 forming the pocket 81.
Lifting tab 13 and tearing opening strip 14 off, which removes the right side seam section 32, opens the envelope creating the opening to lift the contents from the envelope. The lower portion 20 is released along the perforation on the back panel 51 and along perforation 27 at the top of the bridge portion. When bridge portion 18 is separated it removes the side seam section 35 on the left side. When the lower portion 20, 21 is removed it also removes the original seal flap 30 attached to the lower portion 21 of back panel 51. The smaller reply envelope 80 is configured when the lower portion 20, 21 of the envelope which includes the bridge portion 18 is completely torn away leaving the upper portion 63 of the envelope.
When the lower portion 20, 21 of the envelope is removed it removes barcodes 70 the USPS might spray on the envelope to deliver the mail piece. The USPS sprays barcodes 70 to correctly identify the delivery address enabling the mail pieces to be sorted to the correct carrier route for delivering the mail. The USPS only sprays the barcodes 70 if the address for some reason is unreadable by postal process equipment. On the front lower right corner the USPS will spray a POSTNET barcode if the address or the barcode in the address block is not readable by the mail reading and sorting technology. On the back lower left side of the envelope a fluorescent ID TAG may also be sprayed on the mail piece routing the piece to the correct location for delivery. Both of the sprayed barcodes must be obscured or removed from the original mail piece to resend the envelope a second time. Both of these barcodes are priority codes; meaning the mail processing and sorting technology will read these barcodes before reading the address block. If the sprayed barcodes remain on the envelope when the envelope is sent as a reply envelope the address has little significance and the mail will be routed to the address described in the sprayed barcode on the envelope. If these barcodes are the original address to the recipient and remain on the envelope when the recipient tries to resend the envelope with a new address, the sprayed barcode will route the mail back to the original address creating a looping of the mail. Looping can cause delays in payments, delayed reply for special offers, and other inconveniences. By removing the lower portion of the described envelope, both the POSTNET and the ID TAG barcodes are removed eliminating any opportunity for the mail to loop back to the recipient.
Other unique characteristics are:
Envelopes and a related methods are also described in the Applicant's co-pending Non-Provisional patent application publication No. 2008/0041928, having Ser. No. 11/893,562, entitled Reusable Envelope Structures and Methods, filed on Feb. 24, 2005, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
Reusable envelopes features and methods may be used in accordance with the present invention as are disclosed in the Applicant's co-pending Non-Provisional U.S. patent Application filed on Jul. 31, 2003 having Ser. No. 10/632,489 and entitled “Environmentally Friendly Reusable Envelope Structures,” and Applicant's co-pending Non-Provisional U.S. patent application filed on Feb. 24, 2005 having Ser. No. 11/064,791 and entitled “Reusable Envelope Structures and Methods,” the disclosure of each are fully incorporated by reference herein for all purposes.
The present invention has now been described with reference to several exemplary embodiments thereof. The entire disclosure of any patent or patent application identified herein is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. The foregoing disclosure has been provided for clarity of understanding by those skilled in the art. No unnecessary limitations should be taken from the foregoing disclosure. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that changes can be made in the exemplary embodiments described herein without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional application No. 61/208,011, filed Feb. 19, 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
192522 | Marshall | Jun 1877 | A |
460472 | Hitt | Sep 1891 | A |
759382 | Klugh | May 1904 | A |
886449 | West | May 1908 | A |
932715 | Morrison | Aug 1909 | A |
1145935 | Steinke | Jul 1915 | A |
1173869 | Rougeux | Feb 1916 | A |
1187258 | Carr et al. | Jun 1916 | A |
1245447 | Felenchak | Nov 1917 | A |
1438122 | McCoy | Dec 1922 | A |
1953192 | Rossiter | Apr 1934 | A |
1957704 | Drachman | May 1934 | A |
1960054 | Johnson | May 1934 | A |
1988908 | MacKinnon | Jan 1935 | A |
2007625 | Walters, V | Jul 1935 | A |
2129705 | Reineman | Sep 1938 | A |
2201538 | Holden | May 1940 | A |
2310371 | Lines et al. | Feb 1943 | A |
2340700 | Sawdon | Feb 1944 | A |
2350100 | Deutschmeister et al. | May 1944 | A |
2363957 | Goff | Nov 1944 | A |
2400406 | Godoy | May 1946 | A |
2417982 | Histed | Mar 1947 | A |
2835512 | Whitman | May 1958 | A |
2928583 | Law | Mar 1960 | A |
2941711 | Biek | Jun 1960 | A |
2954154 | Stuart | Sep 1960 | A |
3011691 | Mcglynn et al. | Dec 1961 | A |
3062431 | Rabanold | Nov 1962 | A |
3073509 | Ray | Jan 1963 | A |
3086695 | Lillibridge | Apr 1963 | A |
3111257 | Peach | Nov 1963 | A |
3111336 | Schumacher | Nov 1963 | A |
3113716 | Howard | Dec 1963 | A |
3152751 | Hiersteiner | Oct 1964 | A |
3167243 | Casey | Jan 1965 | A |
3184150 | Hubbard | May 1965 | A |
3227360 | Krueger | Jan 1966 | A |
3259304 | Tichnor | Jul 1966 | A |
3261623 | Kiedrowski | Jul 1966 | A |
3276669 | Vilutis | Oct 1966 | A |
3278015 | Bernstein | Oct 1966 | A |
3330581 | Ivarsson-Wallerstrom | Jul 1967 | A |
3374940 | Allison | Mar 1968 | A |
3380648 | deLyra | Apr 1968 | A |
3411699 | Pine et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3426961 | Allison | Feb 1969 | A |
3472444 | Aliff et al. | Oct 1969 | A |
3498528 | Klein | Mar 1970 | A |
3507444 | Werby | Apr 1970 | A |
3525469 | Sawdon | Aug 1970 | A |
3531046 | Carrigan | Sep 1970 | A |
3537637 | Hiersteiner | Nov 1970 | A |
3545669 | Kinkade et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3652007 | Macdougall | Mar 1972 | A |
3653585 | Kazaros | Apr 1972 | A |
3693869 | Eaves, Jr. | Sep 1972 | A |
3718277 | Volkert | Feb 1973 | A |
3747837 | Wilson | Jul 1973 | A |
3802618 | Wiessner | Apr 1974 | A |
3822492 | Crawley | Jul 1974 | A |
3874582 | Wang | Apr 1975 | A |
3899127 | Melander | Aug 1975 | A |
3910410 | Shaw | Oct 1975 | A |
3941309 | Gendron | Mar 1976 | A |
3946938 | Kranz | Mar 1976 | A |
3979051 | Close | Sep 1976 | A |
3982689 | Retrum | Sep 1976 | A |
4072264 | Kranz | Feb 1978 | A |
4084694 | Lainez et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4157759 | Dicker | Jun 1979 | A |
4159129 | Lockhart | Jun 1979 | A |
4180168 | Hiersteiner | Dec 1979 | A |
4190161 | Gendron | Feb 1980 | A |
4190162 | Buescher | Feb 1980 | A |
4194631 | Rangan | Mar 1980 | A |
4245775 | Conn | Jan 1981 | A |
4288028 | Diaz | Sep 1981 | A |
4308987 | Solomon | Jan 1982 | A |
4332346 | Kronman | Jun 1982 | A |
4334618 | Buescher | Jun 1982 | A |
4354631 | Stevenson | Oct 1982 | A |
4379573 | Lomeli et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4382539 | Kronman | May 1983 | A |
4384670 | Dicker | May 1983 | A |
4403696 | Newell | Sep 1983 | A |
4436202 | Berkley | Mar 1984 | A |
4445635 | Barr | May 1984 | A |
4487360 | Fisher et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4538833 | Trikilis | Sep 1985 | A |
4549658 | Sfikas | Oct 1985 | A |
4565317 | Kranz | Jan 1986 | A |
4586611 | Scalzo | May 1986 | A |
4602736 | Barr | Jul 1986 | A |
4613157 | Drabish | Sep 1986 | A |
4620630 | Moss | Nov 1986 | A |
4640030 | Wood et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4651920 | Stenner | Mar 1987 | A |
4653639 | Traynor | Mar 1987 | A |
4688715 | Barr | Aug 1987 | A |
4690322 | Burns | Sep 1987 | A |
4706878 | Lubotta et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4715531 | Stewart et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4775095 | Emmott | Oct 1988 | A |
4778100 | McGuire et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4778101 | Paquin | Oct 1988 | A |
4815654 | Buescher | Mar 1989 | A |
4821439 | Wilck | Apr 1989 | A |
4878613 | Badger et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4896823 | Taylor | Jan 1990 | A |
4899926 | Spaulding | Feb 1990 | A |
4917287 | Watson | Apr 1990 | A |
4927072 | Jenkins et al. | May 1990 | A |
4934536 | Mills | Jun 1990 | A |
4944449 | Schmidt | Jul 1990 | A |
4945218 | Talbott | Jul 1990 | A |
4960237 | Bendel | Oct 1990 | A |
4981251 | Jenkins et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4993624 | Schlich | Feb 1991 | A |
5024374 | Ashby | Jun 1991 | A |
5025980 | Blackman | Jun 1991 | A |
5039000 | Ashby | Aug 1991 | A |
5040720 | Pennock | Aug 1991 | A |
5052613 | Lin | Oct 1991 | A |
5071167 | O'Brien | Dec 1991 | A |
5071399 | Ashby | Dec 1991 | A |
5104036 | Rutkowski et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5110043 | Ashby | May 1992 | A |
5118030 | McNamara et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5118031 | Tighe | Jun 1992 | A |
5125562 | Bendel | Jun 1992 | A |
5163612 | Ashby | Nov 1992 | A |
5197663 | Stude | Mar 1993 | A |
5201464 | File | Apr 1993 | A |
5209698 | Dolan | May 1993 | A |
5213258 | Kim | May 1993 | A |
5224647 | Yanow | Jul 1993 | A |
5232150 | Solomons | Aug 1993 | A |
5248032 | Sheu et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5251810 | Kim | Oct 1993 | A |
5253803 | Chess | Oct 1993 | A |
5267687 | Sherman | Dec 1993 | A |
5271553 | Kim | Dec 1993 | A |
5277362 | Wilson | Jan 1994 | A |
5282568 | File | Feb 1994 | A |
5288014 | Meyers et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5292062 | Chess | Mar 1994 | A |
5299979 | Ballard | Apr 1994 | A |
5307989 | Dyer | May 1994 | A |
5318222 | Bartlett | Jun 1994 | A |
5324927 | Williams | Jun 1994 | A |
5333909 | Hedge, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
5383686 | Laurash | Jan 1995 | A |
5400957 | Stude | Mar 1995 | A |
5415341 | Diamond | May 1995 | A |
5431337 | Bell | Jul 1995 | A |
5458273 | Schubert et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5487566 | Hedge, Jr. | Jan 1996 | A |
5487826 | Back et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5501393 | Walz | Mar 1996 | A |
5503328 | Roccaforte et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5510608 | Williams | Apr 1996 | A |
5514863 | Williams | May 1996 | A |
5516040 | Lin | May 1996 | A |
5520990 | Rotermund | May 1996 | A |
5547227 | Laurash et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553774 | Goodno | Sep 1996 | A |
5570835 | Sung et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5626286 | Petkovsek | May 1997 | A |
5626370 | Petkovsek | May 1997 | A |
5662420 | Sinda et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5683029 | Lyons | Nov 1997 | A |
5687904 | Potter | Nov 1997 | A |
5690220 | Swan | Nov 1997 | A |
5697496 | Bauer | Dec 1997 | A |
5704543 | Pollanen | Jan 1998 | A |
5713511 | Diamond | Feb 1998 | A |
5722538 | Neely et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5738274 | Stude | Apr 1998 | A |
5752647 | Schubert et al. | May 1998 | A |
5823423 | Murray | Oct 1998 | A |
5826787 | Turner | Oct 1998 | A |
5862978 | Forrest | Jan 1999 | A |
5875964 | Pham | Mar 1999 | A |
5887780 | Popat et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887904 | Petkovsek | Mar 1999 | A |
5901843 | Gambardella et al. | May 1999 | A |
5901844 | Gambardella et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909805 | Neely | Jun 1999 | A |
5929415 | Berson | Jul 1999 | A |
5950916 | Santangelo | Sep 1999 | A |
5967403 | Kranz | Oct 1999 | A |
6053855 | Stenner | Apr 2000 | A |
6059316 | Whittington | May 2000 | A |
6070792 | Foushee | Jun 2000 | A |
6129269 | Tait | Oct 2000 | A |
6129389 | Younger | Oct 2000 | A |
6155481 | Rawlings | Dec 2000 | A |
6170879 | Rawlings | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173888 | Fabel | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179202 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6196447 | Purcell et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220504 | Flynn et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223977 | Hill | May 2001 | B1 |
6237844 | Purcell | May 2001 | B1 |
6254138 | Rawlings et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6296179 | Wortman | Oct 2001 | B1 |
D451131 | Okah Chegwe-Akigbe | Nov 2001 | S |
6343736 | Kim | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361077 | Petkovsek | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6402022 | Fabel | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409075 | Mehta et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6435404 | Feick | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6481754 | Fabel | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6491213 | Purcell | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6612484 | Rawlings et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6725587 | Collins | Apr 2004 | B2 |
D510383 | Potter et al. | Oct 2005 | S |
6966484 | Calonje et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983875 | Emmott | Jan 2006 | B2 |
D536375 | Potter et al. | Feb 2007 | S |
7178713 | Stude | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7201305 | Correa | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7350689 | Campbell | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7438213 | Ackley et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7467747 | Haas et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469816 | Rosenkranz et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7549571 | DeLaVergne | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7568613 | Dillon et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7644004 | Guyett et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7726548 | DeLaVergne | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7775420 | Emmott | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7815099 | DeLaVergne | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7866467 | Rosenkranz | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8191763 | DeLaVergne | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20020008135 | Kim | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023948 | Gillespie, IV | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020030093 | Kim | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020130169 | Purcell | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030015581 | Purcell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040050918 | DeLaVergne | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040112946 | Smythe | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040217156 | Purcell | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050045707 | Stude | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050184140 | DeLaVergne | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060113367 | Emmott | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060208053 | Emmott | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060219769 | DeLaVergne | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060266808 | DeLaVergne | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20080041928 | DeLaVergne | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090302099 | DeLaVergne | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100038414 | DeLaVergne | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100219233 | Rosen et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2075214 | Dec 1993 | CA |
2138361 | Aug 1999 | CA |
680124 | Jun 1992 | CH |
0230796 | Aug 1987 | EP |
0611056 | Aug 1994 | EP |
6-72446 | Mar 1994 | JP |
2000313449 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-122287 | May 2001 | JP |
WO 9319991 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 9621598 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 0010885 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 2004076296 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2007001193 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007080395 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61208011 | Feb 2009 | US |