Conversion of carbon to hydrocarbons

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8409419
  • Patent Number
    8,409,419
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 18, 2009
    15 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 2, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Wong; Edna
    Agents
    • Sheridan Ross P.C.
Abstract
The invention provides methods of forming lower alkyls and alcohols from carbon sources thermally and/or electrolytically.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to the electrolytic production of useful hydrocarbons from micron scale carbon sources.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The recent emphasis on recycling and recovery of valuable components in industrial as well as residential and environmental waste streams has spawned a growing pool of raw carbon resources. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,425,315 entitled “Method To Recapture Energy From Organic Waste,” and incorporated herein by reference, teaches methods of recovering carbon from organics-containing waste streams, and the special properties that the recovered carbon possesses. As described in that disclosure, organic waste covers a very broad range of materials, such as auto shredder residue (produced at a level of at least 4 million tons per year and containing potentially 1.4 million tons of carbon) and municipal waste (256 million tons per year potentially producing 90 million tons of carbon). These resources are of interest due to the high level of metallic values in the waste, including, in the case of municipal waste, about one half the used aluminum beverage cans sold in the U.S. per year.


Another source of carbon, lacking any metallic values, is the large amount of waste wood generated in the clean up of forest and Bureau of Land Management property. There have been numerous proposals to use the waste wood for the generation of energy. At an estimated 80 tons of waste wood per acre of land, millions of tons of carbon would be recovered in these energy extraction methods. Similarly, carbon will be recovered from the large supplies of chicken litter and bovine and hog excrement that are starting to be diverted into energy production technologies. Each of these carbon sources represent an undesirable environmental problem that could become a major energy source.


Another potential carbon source includes the wastes from coal processing. “Gob Piles” and “Black Ponds” containing 38 million tons per year represent 5 million tons of carbon. Oil sand residue, oil shale and heavy crude oil, which are not now recoverable, augment a very large total.


The carbon produced in many of these recovery processes, and particularly in the process described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,425,315, entitled “Method To Recapture Energy From Organic Waste” no longer resembles the organic waste from which it originated. For example, the organic waste from auto shredder residue, which includes plastics, rubber, urethane, and cellulosics such as cloth and wood, becomes carbon. The carbon is in chains and cross-linked, but very fine. It has been shown to range from about 2 to about 20 microns in diameter, which is not nano-scaled, but micron-scaled. The result is a very high surface area carbon product that is also very porous to gases and liquids. It is, therefore, ideal for processing into valuable products. While the carbon produced will have an inherent energy value, dependent upon the source and purity of the product, its value, as a combustion product is probably comparable to coal at approximately $40-$60 per ton. It is recognized that the economic conversion of this carbon to hydrocarbons such as methane, methanol, ethanol, and propane would greatly enhance the value of its production. This added value would greatly enhance the environmental benefits foreseen in utilizing the waste recycling and carbon recovery processes described above.







DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is drawn to a process that can efficiently transform raw carbon sources into desirable hydrocarbon products. The current interest in energy production, and the carbon-carbon dioxide cycle in nature, has resulted in a great deal of useful research that is related to the thermodynamics of the processes of the present invention. A study of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide producing a number of hydrocarbons, but emphasizing ethylene, is described in K. Ogure, et al, “Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene at a Three Phase Interface Effects of Electrode Substrate and Catalytic Coating” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 152(12):D213-D219 (2005). The effects of certain catalysts on specificity in this research are noteworthy. Also of interest is a study of the thermodynamic relationships of hydrocarbons, such as methane, methanol, ethanol and propane, when used in fuel cells, as a function of temperature as described in “Equilibria in Fuel Cell Gases” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 150(7):A878-A884 (2003). Another publication of interest is Brisard, “An Electroanalytical Approach for Investigating the Reaction Pathway of Molecules at Surfaces” The Electrochemical Society-Interface 16(2):23-25 (2007). This research shows pathways on certain catalytic surfaces for the conversion of CO2 and CO down to certain hydrocarbons. The processes of the present invention show that reactions proceeding in the opposite direction, from carbon up to hydrocarbons, are both catalytically and thermodynamically feasible and the hydrocarbons reliably and reproducibly produced are useful as fuel sources.


Given the particular properties of the carbon produced in the recovery of precious components from carbon-containing waste streams, and particularly the carbon produced via the processes described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,425,315, as described above to be a cross-linked, but very fine carbon of about 2 to about 20 microns in diameter, and having a very high surface area that is also very porous to gases and liquids, and is useful in the production of hydrogen ions and electrons. A first reaction occurring at the anode:

C+2H2O custom characterCO2+4H++4e  (Reaction 1)


Reaction 1 has a small positive Gibbs free energy and is therefore driven by reactions occurring at the cathode. It has been shown that certain electrolyte salts, such as magnesium chloride, strontium chloride, and zinc chloride, retain water at temperatures as high as 200° C. This water is tightly bound to chloride salt under certain temperature conditions and has limited activity. Under other temperature conditions, the water is free and of normal activity. This can play an important role in hydrocarbon preparation.


A second building block is carbon monoxide, prepared from the carbon, which can play an important role at a cell cathode. The carbon monoxide can be prepared thermally:

2C+O2custom character2CO   (Reaction 2)
or electrochemically:
C+H2Ocustom characterCO+2H++2e  (Reaction 3)


The hydrogen and electrons are reacted at an anode, preferably a silver-plated anode, with oxygen (air) to give water. This provides the needed voltage. The advantage of the electrochemical preparation is the purity of the product, which can be a real benefit in later operations.


Methane Production


Methane may be prepared using two carbons in the anodic Reaction 1 above, to provide 8 electrons and 8 hydrogens (2C+4H2Ocustom character2CO2+8H++8e). At one cathode, 4 hydrogens and electrons react with cathodic carbon to produce methane:

4H++4e+Ccustom characterCH4   (Reaction 4)


The 4 additional hydrogen ions are reacted with oxygen (air) at the two part cathode to produce water:

4H++4e+O2custom character2H2O   (Reaction 5)


These three reactions (Reaction 1, 4 and 5) combine for an overall reaction in the cell:

3C+2H2O+O2custom character2CO2+CH4   (Reaction 6)

Methane production in this cell will require 2.2 pounds of carbon per pound of methane.


Alternatively, a copper cathode may be used to produce methane and water from carbon monoxide and hydrogen ions:

CO+6H+custom characterCH4+H2O   (Reaction 7)


If the salt electrolyte at this cathode is at the proper temperature to have water fully complexed, this water will join the salt and help drive the reaction. In instances when such copper cathodes are used, the other electrons and hydrogen ions are reacted with oxygen at a split of the cathode, producing water:

2H++2e+½O2custom characterH2O   (Reaction 8)


These three reactions (Reaction 3, 7 and 8) combine for an overall reaction in the cell:

2C+2H2O+CO+½O2custom character2CO2+CH4  (Reaction 9)


Methane production in this cell will require 3 pounds of carbon per pound of methane.


In both cases, these cathodic reactions (Reaction 5 and Reaction 8, above) provide the voltage to drive the other two reactions (anodic, Reaction 1 and cathodic methane production, Reaction 4 and Reaction 6).


Methanol Production


Methanol is another product that can be produced from the special carbon recovered from the waste carbon sources as described above, particularly the carbon recovered via the processes described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,425,318. Again utilizing Reaction 1 of water and carbon at the anode, just as described above for methane production, four hydrogen ions and four electrons are created. At a carbon cathode, water and two of the hydrogen ions and electrons are added producing methanol:

C+H2O+2H++2ecustom characterCH3OH   (Reaction 10)

This reaction at the carbon cathode (Reaction 10) is enhanced by the presence of copper or cuprous chloride. At a part of the split cathode, hydrogen ions are reacted with oxygen (air) to produce water as in Reaction 8 above, and the resulting voltage drives the first two Reactions 1 and 10. The overall reaction in these cells is therefore:

2C+½O2+2H2Ocustom characterCO2+CH3OH   (Reaction 11)

In this case, 0.75 pounds of carbon is required to produce a pound of methanol.


In this cell and in the production of methane described above, the cathode can be changed to a copper plate and carbon monoxide can be used at the first cathode:

O2+2C+2H2O+COcustom character2CO2+CH3OH   (Reaction 12)

This requires two carbons and four waters at the anode, to produce eight hydrogen ions and electrons for these reactions. In this second case using a copper cathode, 1.12 pounds of carbon will per pound of methanol.


Ethanol Production


Ethanol is another hydrocarbon currently in demand, that may be produced electrochemically from the carbon sources described above. The reaction requires two carbons at the anode reacting with water to produce eight hydrogen ions and electrons, as in Reaction 1 above. At a first cathode, two carbons and water and four hydrogen ions and electrons produce ethanol:

2C+H2O+4H++4ecustom characterCH3CH2OH   (Reaction 13)

This reaction is preferably catalyzed by the presence of copper, cuprous chloride and other metals.


At the split cathode, the remaining 4 hydrogen ions and electrons react with oxygen (air) to produce 2 water molecules, as in Reaction 8 above. Therefore the overall reaction in this cell is:

4C+3H2O+O2custom character2CO2+CH3CH2OH   (Reaction 14)


In this reaction 1.042 pounds of carbon produce a pound of ethanol.


Propane Production


Another hydrocarbon of interest that may be produced electrochemically from carbon is propane. It is a widely useful fuel of high value that is recovered from natural gas. It has a low free energy at room temperature and is unstable at temperatures above 200° C.


Beginning with the carbon sources described above, and particularly via the processes described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,425,315, two carbons are reacted with four waters at the anode to produce eight hydrogen ions and electrons, as in Reaction 1. At one cathode, four hydrogen ions and electrons are reacted with two moles of methanol and carbon to produce propane and two water molecules:

C+2CH3OH+4H++4ecustom characterCH3CH2CH3+2H2O   (Reaction 15)

This first cathodic Reaction 15 is aided by a salt electrolyte, which absorbs and binds water.


The other four hydrogens react with oxygen (air) at a second cathode, as in Reaction 8 above. The overall reaction in this cell is:

3C+2CH3OH+O2custom character2CO2+CH3CH2CH3   (Reaction 16)


Using this electrolytic production means, 1.63 pounds of carbon react to produce a pound of propane.


Add three Carbons to provide twelve hydrogen ions in reaction with 4+3CO2 and at the two zone cathode 2CO+CH4+8H++8e gives C3H8+2H2O and on the other part of the cathode 4H++4e+O2→2H2O. The cell has 0.364 volts to overcome OV end reaction.


At the anode, 1.5C gives 6H+and 6e+1.5CO2. The two part cathode is CH4+CH3OH+CO+4H++4e→C3H8+2H2O (the first part of the cathode) and 2H2O+½O2→H2O (the second part of the cathode). The cell has 0.475 volts to overcome OV end reaction.


Production Cells


A “traditional” electrolysis cell concept useful for the production of hydrocarbons using the methods of the present invention consists of a two-sided electrode having, on one facing side, an anode, and on the opposite facing side, a cathode. At the cathode, hydrogen ions and electrons react with oxygen to produce water and volts, which drive the reaction at the anode, and which can be externally connected to a second cathode on the other side. This second cathode produces the hydrocarbon, and can enhance that production. Preferably, the hydrogen ions at the cathode pass through a proton-conducting membrane to react with the oxygen and electrons and voltage is required to overcome the resistance in the proton-conducting membrane electrolytes and the overvoltage of the various electrodes. If the voltage is higher than that, it can be used with the amps produced at the anode to provide an external electric load. It may, however, be advantageous to utilize excess voltage in added hydrocarbon production.


In another cell design, two facing electrodes, one an anode and the other a cathode, are divided into two or more segments by barriers extending to a proton-transferring membrane that isolates cathodic electrolytes and gas additions (for instance, carbon monoxide and oxygen or air). This allows the single electrical conducting cathode to have catalytic surfaces that change in each segment, to maximize the reaction desired on that segment. This eliminates the outside cathode connection and permits the other side of the anode to be a part of a second cell.


Cell Variations:


For each of the hydrocarbon products cited, alternate production means are contemplated. Alternative production means each have advantages and disadvantages. For example, CO is a useful building block. An alternate scheme to those already suggested is to produce carbon dioxide from carbon, and react it at a cathode to carbon monoxide and water. A separate cathode or segmented cathode can be used to produce water. With a water-adsorbing electrolyte, the reactions are driven to completion as water is sequestered by the electrolyte.


In a traditional electrolytic cell, three carbons produce twelve hydrogen ions and electrons. Six of these are used to produce water and six to produce methane and water from CO. In a segmented cell, the same anodic reaction can be used to produce 3 hydrogen ions for water and nine for one and one half moles of methane and water. Thus, a pound of methane only requires 2.245 pounds of carbon instead of three pounds of carbon. Instead of using the external CO, carbon dioxide from the anode can be used. This results in a still further decrease in the amount of carbon from external sources needed for the reaction, but the reactions are more complex.


Methanol can be produced directly from CO or CO2 using added water. The use of CO is preferred.


Ethanol similarly can be made directly from a single CO, two CO or CO2. The use of two CO molecules is preferred.


Propane can also be prepared directly from a single molecule of CO, two molecules of CO, methanol, methanol and CO, ethanol, and ethanol and CO.


Additional objects, advantages, and novel features of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the examples described on the following pages.


The foregoing description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. Furthermore, the description is not intended to limit the invention to the form disclosed herein. Consequently, variations and modifications commensurate with the above teachings, and the skill or knowledge of the relevant art, are within the scope of the present invention. The embodiment described hereinabove is further intended to explain the best mode known for practicing the invention and to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention in such, or other, embodiments and with various modifications required by the particular applications or uses of the present invention. It is intended that the appended claims be construed to include alternative embodiments to the extent permitted by the prior art.

Claims
  • 1. A method of producing a hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of: methane, and methanol comprising: charging an electrolytic cell with a carbon source, oxygen and an aqueous electrolyte, said cell comprising: an anode; anda cathode divided into two or more segments separated by barriers that isolate cathodic electrolytes and at least one gas addition,wherein the carbon source is a carbon in fine, cross-linked chains having a particle size in the range of 2 microns to 20 microns in diameter; andproducing said hydrocarbon through an electrochemical process within said cell.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the hydrocarbon produced is methane, wherein the at least one gas addition is carbon monoxide, said method further comprising: charging said electrolytic cell with the carbon monoxide; andproducing carbon dioxide and the methane through the electrochemical process within said cell.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the carbon monoxide is thermally produced from carbon and oxygen.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the carbon monoxide is electrochemically produced from carbon and water, and wherein the anode of said cell is a silver-plated anode.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the hydrocarbon produced is methanol, and the cathode is a carbon cathode, said method further comprising: producing carbon dioxide and the methanol through the electrochemical process within said cell.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the hydrocarbon produced is methanol, wherein the at least one gas addition is carbon monoxide, wherein said cathode is a copper plate cathode, said method further comprising: charging said electrolytic cell with the carbon monoxide; andproducing carbon dioxide and the methanol through the electrochemical process within said cell.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the cathode is a copper cathode.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the aqueous electrolyte comprises cuprous chloride.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the cathodic electrolytes comprises a catalyst selected from the group consisting of copper and cuprous chloride.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the hydrocarbon produced is methane, said method further comprising: producing carbon dioxide and the methane through the electrochemical process within said cell.
  • 11. A method of producing a hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of: ethanol, and propane comprising: charging an electrolytic cell with a carbon source, oxygen and an aqueous electrolyte, said cell comprising: an anode; anda cathode divided into two or more segments separated by barriers that isolate cathodic electrolytes,wherein the carbon source is a carbon in fine, cross-linked chains having a particle size in the range of 2 microns to 20 microns in diameter; andproducing said hydrocarbon through an electrochemical process within said cell.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the hydrocarbon produced is ethanol, said method further comprising: producing carbon dioxide and the ethanol through the electrochemical process within said cell.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the hydrocarbon produced is propane, said method further comprising: charging said electrolytic cell with methanol; andproducing carbon dioxide and the propane through the electrochemical process within said cell.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the cathode is a copper cathode.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the aqueous electrolyte comprises cuprous chloride.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/055,140, filed May 21, 2008, entitled “CONVERSION OF CARBON TO HYDROCARBONS”, which is incorporated herein by this reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (65)
Number Name Date Kind
2198673 Loevenstein Apr 1940 A
2964551 Woolcock Dec 1960 A
3755099 Haupin Aug 1973 A
3765851 White Oct 1973 A
3843457 Grannen et al. Oct 1974 A
3870611 Vestal Mar 1975 A
3958957 Koh et al. May 1976 A
3959096 Langer May 1976 A
4010098 Fassell Mar 1977 A
4021298 Jones May 1977 A
4039433 Peterson Aug 1977 A
4092129 Goudal May 1978 A
4118292 Fray et al. Oct 1978 A
4148710 Burton, III Apr 1979 A
4148752 Burger et al. Apr 1979 A
4158637 Jones Jun 1979 A
4166786 Duraiswamy et al. Sep 1979 A
4219415 Nassef et al. Aug 1980 A
4246255 Grantham Jan 1981 A
4259414 Williams Mar 1981 A
4268363 Coughlin May 1981 A
4279710 Coughlin Jul 1981 A
4389288 Vaughan Jun 1983 A
4435374 Helm, Jr. Mar 1984 A
4447262 Gay et al. May 1984 A
4515659 Wingfield, Jr. et al. May 1985 A
4670113 Lewis Jun 1987 A
4721656 Vance et al. Jan 1988 A
4752364 Dhooge Jun 1988 A
4793904 Mazanec et al. Dec 1988 A
4874485 Steele Oct 1989 A
4897167 Cook Jan 1990 A
4904356 Fray Feb 1990 A
4906290 Worner Mar 1990 A
4962264 Forester Oct 1990 A
4988417 DeYoung Jan 1991 A
5064733 Krist et al. Nov 1991 A
5084140 Holland Jan 1992 A
5090999 Iwase Feb 1992 A
5314171 Friedrichs et al. May 1994 A
5330623 Holland Jul 1994 A
5364821 Holland Nov 1994 A
5387321 Holland Feb 1995 A
5441990 Robin et al. Aug 1995 A
5470380 Jiang et al. Nov 1995 A
5678762 Wood et al. Oct 1997 A
5788739 Margulis Aug 1998 A
5821395 Price et al. Oct 1998 A
5853687 Morlec et al. Dec 1998 A
5948398 Hanamoto et al. Sep 1999 A
6184427 Klepfer et al. Feb 2001 B1
6294068 Petrovic et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299994 Towler et al. Oct 2001 B1
6409974 Towler et al. Jun 2002 B1
6451094 Chang et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458478 Wang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6548197 Chandran et al. Apr 2003 B1
6929752 Cansell Aug 2005 B2
7008463 Furuya Mar 2006 B2
7425315 Kruesi Sep 2008 B2
20030106806 Bandlish et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040216698 Zilka et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050137078 Anderson et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050139484 Brooks et al. Jun 2005 A1
20090084225 Kruesi Apr 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
624369 Jun 1992 AU
867005 Feb 1953 DE
0272803 Jun 1988 EP
0780457 Jun 1997 EP
2322115 Mar 1977 FR
2256435 Apr 1995 GB
59-059846 Apr 1984 JP
WO 9105735 May 1991 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (28)
Entry
Fukunaka et al., “Mass-Transfer Rate on a Plane Vertical Cathode With Hydrogen Gas Evolution”, J. Electrochem. Soc. (Apr. 1989), vol. 136, No. 4, pp. 1002-1009.
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 09160828-1, dated Oct. 15, 2009.
Appell, et al., “Converting Organic Wastes to Oil, A Replenishable Energy Source”, Report of Investigations 7560, 1971, pp. 1-20, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines.
Author Unknown, “A way to turn driftwood into charcoal, vinegar and gas”, Chemical Engineering, Apr. 2003, p. 19.
Berkley, “Considerations regarding the definition of remotely located integrated congeneration plants. Part 1”, CIM Bulletin, Feb. 2003, pp. 59-63, vol. 96, No. 1068.
Boley, et al., “Entrainment Drying and Carbonization of Wood Waster”, Report of Investigation 7282, Aug. 1969, pp. 1-15, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines.
Brisard, “An Electroanalytical Approach for Investigating the Reaction Pathway of Molecules at Surfaces”, The Electrochemical Society-Interface, Summer 2007, pp. 23-25, vol. 16, No. 2.
Chase, “Microwave Pyroysis for Waster Minimisation: Recovery of Aluminium & Hydrocarbons from Packaging Laminates”, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cambridge, at least as early as 2001, pp. 1-4.
Chemat, et al., “Microwave assisted pyrolysis of urea supported on graphite under solvent-free conditions”, Tetrahedron Letters, 2001, pp. 3693-3695, vol. 42.
Cox, et al., “Separation of Mg and Mn from Beverage Can Scrap using a Recessed-Channel Cell”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2003, pp. D200-D208, vol. 150(12), The Electrochemical Society, Inc.
Cleland, et al., “Refining of aluminium bismuth and zinc alloys”, Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Sep. 1979, pp. 1-6.
El Harfi, et al., “Pyrolysis of the Moroccan (Tarfaya) oil shales under microwave irradiation”, Fuel, 2000, pp. 733-742, vol. 79.
Huang, et al., “Activation of methane in microwave plasmas at high pressure”, Research on Chemical Intermediates, 2001, vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 643-658.
Kato, “Organic Wastes as BioMass Energy Resources and Carbon Dioxide Fixation From Brewery Processing Water”, Brewery Association, 2001, pp. 758-762, vol. 96, No. 11, (Translated by the McElroy Translation Company, pp. 1-10).
Kobler, et al., “Plastics from Shredder Residue: Pilot Plant Experiences and Data”, SME Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, 2001, pp. 1-6.
Lee, et al., “Verifying Predictions of Water and Current Distributions in a Serpentine Flow Field Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2003, pp. A341-A348, vol. 150, No. 3.
Lu, et al., “SOFCs for Direct Oxidation of Hydrocarbon Fuels with Samaria-Doped Ceria Electrolyte”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2003, pp. A354-A358, vol. 150, No. 3.
Menéndez, et al., “Microwave-induced pyrolysis of sewage sludge”, Water Research, 2002, pp. 3261-3264, vol. 36.
Monsef-Mirzai, et al., “Rapid Microwave pyrolysis of coal”, Fuel, 1995, pp. 20-27, vol. 74, No. 1.
Nicks, et al., “Catalytic Activity of Rare-Earth Oxides for the Oxidation of Hydrogen”, Reno Metallurgy Research Center; Report of Investigation 7841, date unknown, pp. 1-9, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Reno, NV.
Ogura, et al., “Reduction of CO2 to Ethylene at Three-Phase Interface Effects of Electrode Substrate and Catalytic Coating”, Jourrial of The Electrochemical Society, 2005, vol. 152, No. 12, pp. D213-D219.
Parry, et al., “Drying and Carbonizing Fine Coal in Entrained and Fluidized State”, Report of Investigations 4954, Apr. 1953, pp. 1-43, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines.
Perry, et al., “Energy Utilization, Conversion, and Resource Conservation”, Perry Chemical Engineering Handbook, Sixth Edition, Section 9-4, 1984.
Perry, et al., “Solid Fuels”, Perry Chemical Engineering Handbook, Sixth Edition, Section 9-7, 1984.
Sasaki, et al., “Equilibria in Fuel Cell Gases: I Equilibrium Compositions and Reforming Conditions”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2003, pp. A878-A884, vol. 150, No. 7.
Venkataraman, et al., “Development of new CO Tolerant Ternary Anode Catalysts for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells”, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2003, pp. A278-A284, vol. 150, No. 3.
Wolfson, et al., “Destructive Distillation of Scrap Tires”, Report of Investigations 7302, Sep. 1969, pp. 1-19, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines.
Partial European Search Report for European Application No. 09160828.1, dated Jul. 22, 2009.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100276298 A1 Nov 2010 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61055140 May 2008 US