Conversion of fine catalyst into coke-like material

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7737068
  • Patent Number
    7,737,068
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 20, 2007
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 15, 2010
    13 years ago
Abstract
A process for recovering catalytic metals from fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil comprises pyrolizing fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil to provide one or more lighter oil products and a coke-like material and recovering catalytic metals from the coke-like material.
Description
BACKGROUND

Traditional light oil reserves are being depleted due to high oil production. Oil fields are requiring substantial new investment in secondary and tertiary oil recovery technology. On the other hand, the cost of producing and refining heavy crude has decreased due to new production and refining technologies. Most of the heavy crude reserves all over the world have not yet been exploited. Considering the continuously increasing demand in oil and the large difference in price between light oil and heavy crude, heavy crude reserves are emerging as a very attractive source of energy.


Heavy crude contains 40-70% high boiling range material that boils over 1000° F. (i.e., vacuum resid) and very low amounts of fuels in high demand such as, for example, gasoline and diesel. Therefore, in order to convert vacuum resid to valuable light products, new and more cost effective technologies are needed. Heavy crude can be converted into lighter products via conventional processes such as coking (e.g., delayed coking and/or fluid coking) and hydroconversion (e.g., LC Fining and H-OIL). However, such conventional processes produce large amounts of undesirable byproducts such as, for example, coke or fuel oil and also are very sensitive to the contaminants such as, for example, V, Ni, and S.


Most hydroconversion technologies utilize novel catalysts composed predominantly of metals of Group VA, VIA, VIIA, or VIII metal sulfides especially compounds such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) and nickel sulfide (NiS). Such metals are highly active in hydroconversion of heavy crudes but also are very expensive. In order to minimize the amount of catalyst required, and minimize the diffusion effects, catalyst is often unsupported.


In hydroconversion of vacuum resid and related feedstocks, the remaining portion of unconverted material, which may range from 0 to 10% of fresh feed, shows low API gravity (−10 to 29), high remaining microcarbon residue (MCR) (0 to 60%), very high viscosity and asphaltenes content, and likely also contains catalyst. Therefore, the separation scheme utilized to recover valuable active metals such as, for example, MoS2 and NiS is a critical step in making the process economically attractive. Catalyst remaining in the unconverted slurry bleed oil (USBO) is to be removed and sent for reprocessing to recover the metals and also to recover the unconverted portion of the residue in order to be recycled or further processed.


Expensive spent catalyst contained in the USBO is coated with USBO and is not leachable by conventional technologies of metals extraction that basically are effective for water-based slurries. Therefore, without additional processing, the valuable metals cannot be recovered. Technologies employing microfiltration, ultrafiltration, or nanofiltration; gravity based separation, such as centrifugation or hydrocycloning; and chemical recovery, which may be effective for water-based slurries, similarly do not provide acceptable results for catalyst coated with USBO.


SUMMARY

Provided is a process for recovering catalytic metals from fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil. The process comprises pyrolizing fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil to provide one or more lighter oil products and a coke-like material. Catalytic metals are recovered from the coke-like material.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As used herein, “heavy oil” refers to an oil characterized by low hydrogen to carbon ratios and high carbon residues, asphaltenes, nitrogen, sulfur and metal contents. Examples include atmospheric gas oils, vacuum gas oils, deasphalted oils, olefins, oils derived from tar sands or bitumen, oils derived from coal, heavy crude oils, synthetic oils from Fischer-Tropsch processes, and oils derived from recycled oil wastes and polymers. The heavy oil can comprise microcarbon residue (MCR) in the range of about 15 to 30 weight % and (C7) asphaltenes in the range of about 5 to 20 weight %.


The presently claimed process for recovering catalytic metals from fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil comprises pyrolizing fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil to provide one or more lighter oil products and a coke-like material and recovering catalytic metals from the coke-like material.


Heavy Oil Upgrading


Suitable feeds to a process for upgrading heavy oils using a slurry catalyst composition, include, for example, atmospheric residuum, vacuum residuum, tar from a solvent deasphlating unit, atmospheric gas oils, vacuum gas oils, deasphalted oils, olefins, oils derived from tar sands or bitumen, oils derived from coal, heavy crude oils, synthetic oils from Fischer-Tropsch processes, and oils derived from recycled oil wastes and polymers. The feed is supplied to a reactor, wherein the feed is reacted with a catalyst slurry described in further detail below and preferably hydrogen. In an embodiment, the reactor is a liquid recirculating reactor, although other types of upflow reactors may be employed. The catalyst slurry can be useful for, but not limited to, hydrogenation upgrading processes such as thermal hydrocracking, hydrotreating, hydrodesulphurization, hydrodenitrification, and hydrodemetalization. Effluent streams from the reactor, perhaps following downstream processing, such as, for example, separation(s), can include one or more valuable light products as well as a stream containing unsupported catalyst in unconverted feed.


Processing of an effluent steam containing unsupported catalyst in unconverted feed is described herein. In particular, the cost of the catalyst, and more specifically the expensive metal(s) that comprise the catalyst, may necessitate the recovery of catalyst from unconverted feed to ensure an economical heavy oil upgrading process. Additionally, the recovery of catalyst from unconverted feed may allow for 90-100% conversion of heavy oil, as described in further detail, below. However, the high molecular weight of the unconverted heavy oil feed makes it difficult to separate unsupported catalyst therefrom. Further, conventional filtration processes may not be suitable to separate catalyst from unconverted feed, as the unsupported fine catalyst may cause plugging or fouling of filters.


Catalyst Slurry


The presently described method utilizes catalysts in the conversion (in particular, hydroconversion) of heavy oil (i.e., reaction of a slurry comprising unsupported fine catalyst in heavy oil) into one or more light oil products. In an embodiment, the catalysts are composed predominantly of compounds such as a Group VI and/or Group VIII metal compound sulfide, for example, molybdenum sulfide (MoS2) and nickel sulfide (NiS), as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,484,755 and U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2006/0054534 A1, 2006/0054535 A1, 2006/0058174 A1, and 2006/0058175 A1, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties. The highly active, unsupported catalysts typically exhibit particle size distributions in the range of about 1-8 microns, with some smaller and larger particles existing on either end of the range. In particular, the catalyst particles can have a size distribution in the range of about 0.2-20 microns, and a mean particle size of about 4-5 micron, with the mode being about 6-7 micron.


In particular, the feedstock to the deep catalyst cracking can be the catalyst bleed stream from a vacuum resid unit, which is primarily made-up of spent finely divided unsupported slurry catalyst, carbon fines, and metal fines in unconverted resid hydrocarbon oil. The solids content of the feedstock can be in the range of about 5-40 weight %, for example about 15-30 weight % or about 20-25 weight %.


Coking


When the MCR or asphaltenes in the heavy oil are exposed to extreme temperatures, ranging from 700 to 1000+° F., the petroleum molecules are “thermally cracked” in such a way as to produce some portion of lighter oil product and some portion of condensed asphaltenes and heavy molecules as petroleum coke. The coke-like matrix preferably is leachable, such that valuable metals (e.g., Mo, Ni, and V) can be recovered therefrom.


The coking unit can be, for example, a standard delayed coking unit, a modified delayed coking unit, a screw reactor type of pyrolyzer, a screw coker, a rotary kiln, or a rotary calciner. In the coking reaction, cracked liquid and gas products as well as coke are produced. The coke contains slurry catalyst.


A large amount of coke deposited onto the catalyst can block access to the nickel and molybdenum that are desired to be leached. The amount of coke generated in the coking step can be many times (e.g., about 3 to about 6 times) greater than the amount of coke present on the used catalyst as it exits heavy oil upgrading. Nevertheless, according to the present process the coke deposited in the coking step does not encapsulate the metals.


Grinding


Thus, prior to metals recovery, the coke-like material can be ground, and the ground particles retain enough porosity to be leachable. For example, the coke-like material can be ground to a particle size ranging from about greater than 1 to less than 50 microns.


Metals Recovery


The process of recovering metals, specifically molybdenum, nickel, and deposited vanadium, from coked, ground catalyst comprises the steps of autoclave-based ammoniacal metals leach, vanadium metal recovery, nickel metal solvent extraction, and molybdenum metal solvent extraction. Coked ground catalyst, containing MOS2 and slurried in water, enters an autoclave, along with ammonia and enriched air containing additional oxygen. Leaching reactions occur in the autoclave, producing ammonium molybdate and nickel ammonium sulfate, which remain in solution and pass to a leach residue filter press. The ammonium metavanadate precipitates out as a solid in the leach slurry. Solid/liquid separation occurs in the leach residue filter press.


More specifically, a stream of coked, ground catalyst slurried with water is pumped to an ammoniacal pressure leaching autoclave. This autoclave is a multi-chambered, agitated vessel, in which both ammonia and oxygen are supplied to induce leaching reactions. These reactions can occur at various temperatures, for example, in the range from about 20° C. through about 315° C., in the range from about 35° C. through about 250° C., or in the range from about 90° C. through about 200° C. Autoclave vessel pressure ranges can be, for example, in the range from about 0 psig through about 1200 psig, in the range from about 100 psig through about 900 psig, or in the range from about 300 psig through about 700 psig, sufficient to suppress flashing in the vessel. Process pH values range from about 7 through about 12, for example, from about 8 through about 11 or from about 9 through about 10. Leaching reactions occur as specified in the equations below.

MoS2+4.5O2+6NH3+3H2O→(NH4)2MoO4−+2(NH4)2SO4
V2S3+7O2+8NH3+4H2O→2NH4VO3+3(NH4)2SO4
NiS+2O2+6NH3→Ni(NH3)6SO4


Further details of metals recovery, for example, vanadium extraction, nickel extraction, and molybdenum removal, can be found in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0025899, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


The following examples are intended to be illustrative and are not meant to be limiting in any way.


EXAMPLE

Vacuum residue containing spent catalyst was processed in a microcoker unit and exposed to coking conditions fro 850 to 950° F. Products from the microcoker unit included a cracked gas stream, a coker liquid product stream, and a solid coke product. The coker liquid product stream was analyzed for metals, specifically molybdenum, nickel, and vanadium. None were found. The solid coke product was similarly analyzed, and it was determined that the solid coke product contained appreciable quantities of molybdenum, nickel, and vanadium. The solid coke product was milled to 100% passing 325 mesh (44 μm) in a ceramic ball mill, and the milled sample was then was subjected to pressure leach testing under conditions taught in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0025899 A1, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Extraction of molybdenum was reported at 99.4%, extraction of nickel was reported at 86.3%, and extraction of vanadium was reported at 68.9%.


Many modifications of the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein will readily occur to those of skill in the art. Accordingly, the present disclosure is to be construed as including all structure and methods that fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A process for recovering metals from spent fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil, the process comprising: pyrolizing the spent fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil by thermal cracking to provide one or more lighter oil products and a coke-like material comprising metals; andrecovering metals from the coke-like material,wherein the spent fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil comprises a Group VI metal sulfide and/or a Group VIII metal sulfide.
  • 2. The process of claim 1, wherein pyrolizing is conducted in a reactor selected from the group consisting of standard delayed coking unit, a modified delayed coking unit, a screw reactor type of pyrolyzer, a screw coker, a rotary kiln, and a rotary calciner.
  • 3. The process of claim 1, wherein pyrolizing comprises heating to a temperature of greater than 700° F.
  • 4. The process of claim 1, wherein pyrolizing comprises heating for greater than 0.5 hours.
  • 5. The process of claim 1, wherein the coke-like material has sufficient porosity to allow leaching of metals in the fine catalyst.
  • 6. The process of claim 1, wherein the fine catalyst is partially or completely spent.
  • 7. The process of claim 1, wherein the fine catalyst comprises particles having a size of less than 10 microns.
  • 8. The process of claim 1, further comprising grinding the coke-like material.
  • 9. The process of claim 1, further comprising grinding the coke-like material to a particle size ranging from about greater than 1 to less than 50 microns.
  • 10. The process of claim 1, further comprising slurrying the coke-like material with water.
  • 11. The process of claim 1, wherein recovering metals from the coke-like material comprises subjecting the coke-like material to leaching reactions.
  • 12. The process of claim 11, wherein the leaching reactions occur in an autoclave, wherein the coke-line material comprises molybdenum, nick, and vanadium.
  • 13. The process of claim 12, wherein ammonia and oxygen are supplied to an ammoniacal pressure leaching autoclave to induce leaching reactions.
  • 14. The process of claim 12, wherein the leaching reactions produce ammonium molybdate and nickel ammonium sulfate.
  • 15. The process of claim 13, further comprising filtering ammonium molybdate as a solid in a leach slurry from nickel ammonium sulfate in a solution.
  • 16. The process of claim 1, wherein the fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil comprises particles having a mean particle size of about 4-5 micron.
  • 17. The process of claim 1, wherein the fine catalyst slurried in heavy oil is from a catalyst bleed stream from a vacuum resid unit.
  • 18. The process of claim 17, wherein the catalyst bleed stream comprises unsupported slurry catalyst, carbon fines, and metal finds in unconverted resid hydrocarbon oil.
  • 19. The process of claim 18, wherein the catalyst bleed stream comprises 5-40 wt. % solids.
  • 20. The process of claim 19, wherein the catalyst bleed stream comprises 15-30 wt. % solids.
US Referenced Citations (147)
Number Name Date Kind
2487867 Griffin, Jr. Nov 1949 A
2515062 Smith Jul 1950 A
2774742 Stover et al. Dec 1956 A
2787599 Belden Apr 1957 A
2983671 Fogle May 1961 A
3072560 Paterson et al. Jan 1963 A
3193486 Payne Jul 1965 A
3250819 Cabbage May 1966 A
3416882 Whigham Dec 1968 A
3429805 Karbosky Feb 1969 A
3567433 Gutnikov Mar 1971 A
3707461 Gatsis et al. Dec 1972 A
3923643 Lewis et al. Dec 1975 A
4040958 Rammler Aug 1977 A
4049765 Yamazaki Sep 1977 A
4105731 Yamazaki Aug 1978 A
4120698 Atchinson et al. Oct 1978 A
4169506 Berry Oct 1979 A
4172782 Masuko et al. Oct 1979 A
4211816 Booker et al. Jul 1980 A
4224135 Gidaspow Sep 1980 A
4248686 Gidaspow Feb 1981 A
4277731 Pomgracz Jul 1981 A
4305463 Zakiewicz Dec 1981 A
4353418 Hoekstra et al. Oct 1982 A
4382068 Rokukawa May 1983 A
4395315 Zambrano Jul 1983 A
4407707 Merchant, Jr. et al. Oct 1983 A
4415541 Melin Nov 1983 A
4416754 Merchant, Jr. et al. Nov 1983 A
4436636 Carnicom Mar 1984 A
4482766 Stonner Nov 1984 A
4500495 Hubred et al. Feb 1985 A
4514368 Hubred Apr 1985 A
4525267 Inooka Jun 1985 A
4544479 Yan Oct 1985 A
4579637 Jaisinghani et al. Apr 1986 A
4581112 Mintz Apr 1986 A
4584140 Blewett et al. Apr 1986 A
4622118 Chimenti Nov 1986 A
4636317 Lewis Jan 1987 A
4648964 Leto et al. Mar 1987 A
4655927 Ford Apr 1987 A
4657745 Hyatt Apr 1987 A
4661265 Olsen et al. Apr 1987 A
4662669 Erickson et al. May 1987 A
4666685 Wiewiorowski May 1987 A
4668379 Rosensweig et al. May 1987 A
4732664 Martini et al. Mar 1988 A
4769127 Erickson et al. Sep 1988 A
4790941 Taylor Dec 1988 A
4844804 Taylor Jul 1989 A
4846976 Ford Jul 1989 A
4850498 Taylor Jul 1989 A
4888104 de Aqudelo Dec 1989 A
4927794 Marcantonio et al. May 1990 A
4937218 de Aqudelo Jun 1990 A
4940529 Beaton et al. Jul 1990 A
4946068 Erickson et al. Aug 1990 A
4954240 Eidt, Jr. et al. Sep 1990 A
4990241 Buttke et al. Feb 1991 A
5006264 Acuna Apr 1991 A
5008001 Kitamura et al. Apr 1991 A
5013427 Mosby May 1991 A
5013533 Howard et al. May 1991 A
5021160 Wolpert Jun 1991 A
5046856 McIntire Sep 1991 A
5053118 Houser Oct 1991 A
5059331 Goyal Oct 1991 A
5070064 Hsu et al. Dec 1991 A
5080721 Flanigan et al. Jan 1992 A
5124025 Kolstad et al. Jun 1992 A
5124026 Taylor et al. Jun 1992 A
5124027 Beaton et al. Jun 1992 A
5149433 Lien Sep 1992 A
5169968 Rice Dec 1992 A
5183572 Benn Feb 1993 A
5194154 Moyer et al. Mar 1993 A
5198007 Moyer Mar 1993 A
5209840 Sherwood, Jr. et al. May 1993 A
5228978 Taylor et al. Jul 1993 A
5230791 Sherwood, Jr. Jul 1993 A
5230804 Leupold et al. Jul 1993 A
5242578 Taylor et al. Sep 1993 A
5254513 Sherwood, Jr. et al. Oct 1993 A
5258117 Kolstad et al. Nov 1993 A
5269934 Dubrovsky et al. Dec 1993 A
5290959 Rice Mar 1994 A
5370788 Dai et al. Dec 1994 A
5372722 Schwering et al. Dec 1994 A
5445728 Sherwood, Jr. et al. Aug 1995 A
5474668 Ackerson et al. Dec 1995 A
5480553 Yamamori et al. Jan 1996 A
5484755 Lopez Jan 1996 A
5512084 Mauterer Apr 1996 A
5525235 Chen et al. Jun 1996 A
5527473 Ackerman Jun 1996 A
5599463 Hedrick Feb 1997 A
5620588 Ackerson et al. Apr 1997 A
5683916 Gaffe et al. Nov 1997 A
5698101 Kopp et al. Dec 1997 A
5750026 Gadkaree et al. May 1998 A
5770078 Hedrick Jun 1998 A
5845993 Shirtum et al. Dec 1998 A
5853564 Ackerson et al. Dec 1998 A
5885422 Kurukchi et al. Mar 1999 A
5900159 Engel et al. May 1999 A
5916440 Garcera et al. Jun 1999 A
5922201 Yamamori et al. Jul 1999 A
5944998 Rolchigo et al. Aug 1999 A
6017022 Shirtum Jan 2000 A
6024862 Ackerson et al. Feb 2000 A
6036865 Miller et al. Mar 2000 A
6045703 Miller Apr 2000 A
6068760 Benham et al. May 2000 A
6110390 Potter et al. Aug 2000 A
6129839 Maing, Jr. Oct 2000 A
6180072 Veal et al. Jan 2001 B1
6224765 Watanabe et al. May 2001 B1
6281405 Davis et al. Aug 2001 B1
6375843 Potter et al. Apr 2002 B1
6380452 Davis et al. Apr 2002 B1
6390304 Wilson et al. May 2002 B1
6454932 Baldassari et al. Sep 2002 B1
6491822 Alper Dec 2002 B2
6517725 Spearman et al. Feb 2003 B2
6518441 Grosch et al. Feb 2003 B2
6548197 Chandran et al. Apr 2003 B1
6656342 Smith et al. Dec 2003 B2
6683783 Smalley et al. Jan 2004 B1
6726832 Baldassari et al. Apr 2004 B1
6762209 Neathery et al. Jul 2004 B1
6764598 Yu et al. Jul 2004 B2
6790934 Johnson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6841062 Reynolds Jan 2005 B2
6887390 Mohedas et al. May 2005 B2
7214309 Chen et al. May 2007 B2
20020190005 Branning Dec 2002 A1
20050067194 Pena et al. Mar 2005 A1
20060054534 Chen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060054535 Chen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058174 Chen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060058175 Chen et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060135631 Kopponen et al. Jun 2006 A1
20070025899 Marcantonio Feb 2007 A1
20070138055 Farshid et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070138057 Farshid et al. Jun 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
WO 9958732 Nov 1999 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090163352 A1 Jun 2009 US