Conversion of liquid heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks to gaseous products

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8653149
  • Patent Number
    8,653,149
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 26, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 18, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to processes and apparatuses for generating light olefins, methane and other higher-value gaseous hydrocarbons from “liquid” heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to processes and apparatuses for generating light olefins, methane and other higher-value gaseous hydrocarbons from “liquid” heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Liquid heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks are viscous liquid or semi-solid materials that are flowable at ambient conditions or can be made flowable at elevated temperature conditions. These materials are typically the residue from the processing of hydrocarbon materials such as crude oil.


For example, the first step in the refining of crude oil is normally a distillation to separate the complex mixture of hydrocarbons into fractions of differing volatility. A typical first-step distillation requires heating at atmospheric pressure to vaporize as much of the hydrocarbon content as possible without exceeding an actual temperature of about 650° F., since higher temperatures may lead to thermal decomposition. The fraction which is not distilled at atmospheric pressure is commonly referred to as “atmospheric petroleum residue”. The fraction may be further distilled under vacuum, such that an actual temperature of up to about 650° F. can vaporize even more material. The remaining undistillable liquid is referred to as “vacuum petroleum residue”. Both atmospheric petroleum residue and vacuum petroleum residue are considered liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials for the purposes of the present invention.


Liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials are in a relative sense low value materials, for example, as a fuel because of their high viscosity and low volatility, and increased concentration of impurities such as sulfur. For example, sulfur concentration in vacuum petroleum residue is typically at least about 2.5 times the concentration of sulfur in crude oil.


In the case of petroleum residues, the residue fraction typically constitutes more than 20% by mass of the starting crude oil, and in some cases more than 50% of the mass of the starting crude oil in the case of heavy crude oils, so there is high incentive to convert the residue to higher-value products such as, for example, lighter hydrocarbon liquids and gases.


Liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials may be subjected to destructive thermal decomposition to yield cracked liquid and gas, and still lower-value solid petroleum coke. The reactors for thermal decomposition are called cokers, and they may be fluidized bed reactors or stationary drums. Even though the resulting liquid products are higher-value, they still require much upgrading by reaction with hydrogen to be blended with other petroleum products.


Other outlets for liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials include blending with lower viscosity distillates to make residual fuel oil, or use as paving or roofing asphalts, which are also considered low-value uses.


Liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials may also be converted to low and medium BTU gases (syngas and methane-enriched synthesis gas) via catalytic and non-catalytic (thermal) gasification processes. The catalytic gasification (hydromethanation) of such materials in the presence of a catalyst source, hydrogen, carbon monoxide and steam at elevated temperatures and pressures to produce methane and other value-added gases is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,955,695, US2010/0071262A1, US2010/0076235A1, WO2010/033848A2 and WO2010/048493A2.


A need, however, remains for processes that can produce even higher value products, such as light olefins along with methane and other higher-value gaseous hydrocarbons, from liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials.


One such process is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,898,299, in which an atmospheric petroleum residue is first hydrogenated, then vacuum distilled into a liquid phase and a vacuum residue phase. The resulting lighter liquid phase is then thermally cracked (non-catalytically pyrolyzed) in the presence of steam to generate olefins. This process, however, only seems to utilize the lighter portions of the atmospheric petroleum residue, leaving significant amounts of additional residue material.


A catalytic process for upgrading liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,816,298, but the disclosed process is focused on intermediate molecular weight liquid products and not lower molecular weight gaseous products. Specifically, the disclosed process converts a liquid heavy hydrocarbon material into a sulfur-reduced “normally liquid hydrocarbon product” (having an atmospheric boiling point of greater than 70° F.) and a hydrogen-containing gas by contacting the material with hydrogen and a carbon oxide-containing gas, at a pressure above 150 psig and a temperature between about 700° F. and 1100° F., in a first reaction zone containing a supported alkali metal catalyst. A solid material (coke) is also produced, which deposits on the supported alkali metal catalyst. A portion of the supported alkali metal catalyst is then fed to a second reaction zone where is it contacted with steam and optionally oxygen at a pressure above 150 psig and a temperature above 1200° F. to consume the deposited carbon, thereby regenerating the supported catalyst and producing hydrogen, carbon oxide-containing gas and heat energy for the first reaction zone. The hot regenerated support is also fed back into the first reaction zone. The first reaction zone of this process is thus essentially a coker unit, and the second reaction zone is essentially a gasification unit. The desired liquid products from this process include, for example, gasoline, heating oil and gas oil cuts. While there appear to be unsaturated compounds in the liquid product, it is actually a stated benefit of the disclosed process to reduce unsaturated components as they are detrimental, for example, in gasoline products. There is also no disclosure of the production of light olefins such as ethylene and propylene.


Several references also disclose the production of olefins from various residue feedstocks including, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,181, U.S. Pat. No. 4,980,053, U.S. Pat. No. 6,179,993, U.S. Pat. No. 6,303,842, WO2007/149917A1 and other disclosures cited therein. Generally, in these disclosures, the petroleum reside feedstock is contacted with a fluidized bed of heated solids and optionally a catalyst component (which may be the same or a separate component from the heated solids) at elevated temperatures and short contact times. A vapor phase is produced with light olefins and other light hydrocarbons, and coke is deposited on the heated particles. The coke-coated particles are regenerated and heated typically by burning off the coke. Catalysts are typically acidic components such as refractory metal oxides and aluminates, zeolites and spent fluid catalytic cracking catalysts, vanadium rich flue fines, spent bauxite and mixtures.


Notwithstanding the existing processes, a need still remains for additional processes for converting lower-value liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials into higher-value gaseous product mixes including light olefins and alkanes.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one aspect, the invention provides a process for generating a gaseous raw product stream from a liquid heavy hydrocarbon material, the process comprising the steps of:


(a) dispersing the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material in a gaseous carrier to produce a dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed;


(b) introducing a superheated gas feed stream comprising heat energy and steam, and optionally carbon monoxide and hydrogen, into a reactor containing a bed of an alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier;


(c) optionally introducing an oxygen-rich stream into the reactor to generate heat energy and, optionally, carbon monoxide and hydrogen in situ;


(d) contacting the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed with steam, carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the presence of the bed of the alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier, at an elevated pressure and at a temperature of from about 1100° F. to about 1400° F., to generate a raw gaseous mixture comprising methane, one or both of ethylene and propylene, and one or both of ethane and propane; and


(e) withdrawing a stream of the raw gaseous mixture from the reactor as the gaseous raw product stream,


wherein the reaction in step (d) has a syngas demand, and the syngas demand is at least substantially satisfied by carbon monoxide and hydrogen that may be present in the superheated gas feed stream, and by carbon monoxide and hydrogen that may be generated in step (c).


The process in accordance with the present invention is useful, for example, for producing higher-value gaseous products from lower-value liquid heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks.


These and other embodiments, features and advantages of the present invention will be more readily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art from a reading of the following detailed description.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a diagram of a first embodiment of a process in accordance with the present invention whereby a gaseous raw product stream containing lower alkanes and lower olefins is produced from a liquid heavy hydrocarbon material in a vertical fluidized bed reactor.



FIG. 2 is a diagram of a second embodiment of a process in accordance with the present invention whereby a gaseous raw product stream containing lower alkanes and lower olefins is produced from a liquid heavy hydrocarbon material in a horizontal moving bed reactor.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention relates to processes for converting a liquid heavy hydrocarbon material ultimately into a gaseous product stream containing significant amounts light olefins and light alkanes. Further details are provided below.


In the context of the present description, all publications, patent applications, patents and other references mentioned herein, if not otherwise indicated, are explicitly incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth.


Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control.


Except where expressly noted, trademarks are shown in upper case.


Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure, suitable methods and materials are described herein.


Unless stated otherwise, all percentages, parts, ratios, etc., are by weight.


Unless stated otherwise, pressures expressed in psi units are gauge, and pressures expressed in kPa units are absolute.


When an amount, concentration, or other value or parameter is given as a range, or a list of upper and lower values, this is to be understood as specifically disclosing all ranges formed from any pair of any upper and lower range limits, regardless of whether ranges are separately disclosed. Where a range of numerical values is recited herein, unless otherwise stated, the range is intended to include the endpoints thereof, and all integers and fractions within the range. It is not intended that the scope of the present disclosure be limited to the specific values recited when defining a range.


When the term “about” is used in describing a value or an end-point of a range, the disclosure should be understood to include the specific value or end-point referred to.


As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but can include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).


The use of “a” or “an” to describe the various elements and components herein is merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the disclosure. This description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obvious that it is meant otherwise.


The term “substantial portion”, as used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, means that greater than about 90% of the referenced material, preferably greater than about 95% of the referenced material, and more preferably greater than about 97% of the referenced material. The percent is on a molar basis when reference is made to a molecule (such as methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide), and otherwise is on a weight basis.


The term “predominant portion”, as used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, means that greater than about 50% of the referenced material. The percent is on a molar basis when reference is made to a molecule (such as hydrogen, methane, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide), and otherwise is on a weight basis.


The term “depleted” is synonymous with reduced. For example, removing a substantial portion of a material from a stream would produce a material-depleted stream that is substantially depleted of that material.


The term “carbonaceous” as used herein is synonymous with hydrocarbon.


The term “carbonaceous material” as used herein is a material containing organic hydrocarbon content. Carbonaceous materials can be classified as biomass or non-biomass materials as defined herein.


The term “biomass” as used herein refers to carbonaceous materials derived from recently (for example, within the past 100 years) living organisms, including plant-based biomass and animal-based biomass. For clarification, biomass does not include fossil-based carbonaceous materials, such as coal. For example, see US2009/0217575A1 and US2009/0217587A1.


The term “plant-based biomass” as used herein means materials derived from green plants, crops, algae, and trees, such as, but not limited to, sweet sorghum, bagasse, sugarcane, bamboo, hybrid poplar, hybrid willow, albizia trees, eucalyptus, alfalfa, clover, oil palm, switchgrass, sudangrass, millet, jatropha, and miscanthus (e.g., Miscanthus×giganteus). Biomass further include wastes from agricultural cultivation, processing, and/or degradation such as corn cobs and husks, corn stover, straw, nut shells, vegetable oils, canola oil, rapeseed oil, biodiesels, tree bark, wood chips, sawdust, and yard wastes.


The term “animal-based biomass” as used herein means wastes generated from animal cultivation and/or utilization. For example, biomass includes, but is not limited to, wastes from livestock cultivation and processing such as animal manure, guano, poultry litter, animal fats, and municipal solid wastes (e.g., sewage).


The term “non-biomass”, as used herein, means those carbonaceous materials which are not encompassed by the term “biomass” as defined herein. For example, non-biomass include, but is not limited to, anthracite, bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, lignite, petroleum coke, asphaltenes, liquid petroleum residues or mixtures thereof. For example, see US2009/0166588A1, US2009/0165379A1, US2009/0165380A1, US2009/0165361A1, US2009/0217590A1 and US2009/0217586A1.


The terms “petroleum coke” and “petcoke” as used here include both (i) the solid thermal decomposition product of high-boiling hydrocarbon fractions obtained in petroleum processing (heavy residues—“resid petcoke”); and (ii) the solid thermal decomposition product of processing tar sands (bituminous sands or oil sands—“tar sands petcoke”). Such carbonization products include, for example, green, calcined, needle and fluidized bed petcoke.


Resid petcoke can also be derived from a crude oil, for example, by coking processes used for upgrading heavy-gravity residual crude oil (such as a liquid petroleum residue), which petcoke contains ash as a minor component, typically about 1.0 wt % or less, and more typically about 0.5 wt % of less, based on the weight of the coke. Typically, the ash in such lower-ash cokes comprises metals such as nickel and vanadium.


Tar sands petcoke can be derived from an oil sand, for example, by coking processes used for upgrading oil sand. Tar sands petcoke contains ash as a minor component, typically in the range of about 2 wt % to about 12 wt %, and more typically in the range of about 4 wt % to about 12 wt %, based on the overall weight of the tar sands petcoke. Typically, the ash in such higher-ash cokes comprises materials such as silica and/or alumina.


Petroleum coke has an inherently low moisture content, typically, in the range of from about 0.2 to about 2 wt % (based on total petroleum coke weight).


The petroleum coke can comprise at least about 70 wt % carbon, at least about 80 wt % carbon, or at least about 90 wt % carbon, based on the total weight of the petroleum coke. Typically, the petroleum coke comprises less than about 20 wt % inorganic compounds, based on the weight of the petroleum coke.


The term “asphaltene” as used herein is an aromatic carbonaceous solid at room temperature, and can be derived, for example, from the processing of crude oil and crude oil tar sands.


The term “coal” as used herein means peat, lignite, sub-bituminous coal, bituminous coal, anthracite, or mixtures thereof. In certain embodiments, the coal has a carbon content of less than about 85%, or less than about 80%, or less than about 75%, or less than about 70%, or less than about 65%, or less than about 60%, or less than about 55%, or less than about 50% by weight, based on the total coal weight. In other embodiments, the coal has a carbon content ranging up to about 85%, or up to about 80%, or up to about 75% by weight, based on the total coal weight. Examples of useful coal include, but are not limited to, Illinois #6, Pittsburgh #8, Beulah (ND), Utah Blind Canyon, and Powder River Basin (PRB) coals. Anthracite, bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, and lignite coal may contain about 10 wt %, from about 5 to about 7 wt %, from about 4 to about 8 wt %, and from about 9 to about 11 wt %, ash by total weight of the coal on a dry basis, respectively. However, the ash content of any particular coal source will depend on the rank and source of the coal, as is familiar to those skilled in the art. See, for example, “Coal Data: A Reference”, Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels, U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-0064(93), February 1995.


The ash produced from combustion of a coal typically comprises both a fly ash and a bottom ash, as are familiar to those skilled in the art. The fly ash from a bituminous coal can comprise from about 20 to about 60 wt % silica and from about 5 to about 35 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the fly ash. The fly ash from a sub-bituminous coal can comprise from about 40 to about 60 wt % silica and from about 20 to about 30 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the fly ash. The fly ash from a lignite coal can comprise from about 15 to about 45 wt % silica and from about 20 to about 25 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the fly ash. See, for example, Meyers, et al. “Fly Ash. A Highway Construction Material,” Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-IP-76-16, Washington, D.C., 1976.


The bottom ash from a bituminous coal can comprise from about 40 to about 60 wt % silica and from about 20 to about 30 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the bottom ash. The bottom ash from a sub-bituminous coal can comprise from about 40 to about 50 wt % silica and from about 15 to about 25 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the bottom ash. The bottom ash from a lignite coal can comprise from about 30 to about 80 wt % silica and from about 10 to about 20 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the bottom ash. See, for example, Moulton, Lyle K. “Bottom Ash and Boiler Slag,” Proceedings of the Third International Ash Utilization Symposium, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Information Circular No. 8640, Washington, D.C., 1973.


A material such as methane can be biomass or non-biomass under the above definitions depending on its source of origin.


A “non-gaseous” material is substantially a liquid, semi-solid, solid or mixture at ambient conditions. For example, coal, petcoke, asphaltene and liquid petroleum residue are non-gaseous materials, while methane and natural gas are gaseous materials.


The term “unit” refers to a unit operation. When more than one “unit” is described as being present, those units are operated in a parallel fashion. A single “unit”, however, may comprise more than one of the units in series, or in parallel, depending on the context. For example, an acid gas removal unit may comprise a hydrogen sulfide removal unit followed in series by a carbon dioxide removal unit. As another example, a contaminant removal unit may comprise a first removal unit for a first contaminant followed in series by a second removal unit for a second contaminant. As yet another example, a compressor may comprise a first compressor to compress a stream to a first pressure, followed in series by a second compressor to further compress the stream to a second (higher) pressure.


The term “syngas demand” refers to the maintenance of a substantially steady-state syngas balance in the reactor. In the overall desirable steady-state reaction, it appears that hydrogen and carbon monoxide are generated and consumed in relative balance, and both hydrogen and carbon monoxide are typically withdrawn as part of the gaseous products. Hydrogen and carbon monoxide, therefore, must be added to (and/or optionally separately generated in situ via a combustion/oxidation reaction with supplied oxygen as discussed below) the reactor in an amount at least required to substantially maintain this reaction balance. For the purposes of the present invention, the amount of hydrogen and carbon monoxide that must be “added” (fed to the reactor and generated in situ) for the reaction is the “syngas demand”.


The term “steam demand” refers to the amount of steam that must be added to the reactor. Steam can be added, for example, via steam in the superheated gas feed stream, the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon stream, the optional oxygen-rich stream and/or as a separate steam stream. The amount of steam to be added (and the source) is discussed in further detail below. Steam generated in situ from vaporization of any moisture content of the feedstock or replacement catalyst feed can assist in satisfying the steam demand; however, it should be noted that any steam generated in situ or fed into the reactor at a temperature lower than the reactor operating temperature will have an impact on the “heat demand” for the reaction.


The term “heat demand” refers to the amount of heat energy that must be added to the reactor to keep the reaction of step (d) in substantial thermal balance, as further detailed below.


The materials, methods, and examples herein are illustrative only and, except as specifically stated, are not intended to be limiting.


Liquid Heavy Hydrocarbon Materials


The present invention concerns the processing of “liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials” which, in accordance with the present invention, are viscous liquid or semi-solid carbonaceous materials that are flowable liquids at ambient conditions, or can be made flowable liquids at the elevated temperature conditions utilized as the feed conditions for the present process (discussed in further detail below), such that the materials can be dispersed in a gaseous carrier for use in the process of the present invention.


Non-limiting examples of liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials include vacuum resids; atmospheric resids; heavy and reduced petroleum crude oils; pitch, asphalt and bitumen (naturally occurring as well as resulting from petroleum refining processes); tar sand oil; shale oil; bottoms from catalytic cracking processes; coal liquefaction bottoms; and other hydrocarbon feedstreams containing significant amounts of heavy or viscous materials such as petroleum wax fractions.


The liquid heavy hydrocarbon materials may inherently contain minor amounts of solid carbonaceous materials, such as petroleum coke and/or solid asphaltenes, that are generally dispersed within the liquid heavy hydrocarbon matrix, and that remain solid at the elevated temperature conditions utilized as the feed conditions for the present process.


In addition, minor amounts of solid carbonaceous materials may be added to the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material for use in the present invention. Non-limiting examples of such solid carbonaceous materials include petroleum coke, solid asphaltenes, coal and biomass. Recycle/replacement alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier may also be a solid carbonaceous material added to the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material. Typically, the solid carbonaceous materials should be of a particle size suitable for dispersion within the liquid heavy hydrocarbon matrix, but may also be partially utilized in a particulate form coated with liquid heavy hydrocarbon material, so long as the resulting material is dispersible in the gaseous carrier utilized to prepare the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed.


The carbonaceous content of the dispersed liquid heavy hydrocarbon feed should predominantly comprise the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material.


General Process Information


In embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, a liquid heavy hydrocarbon material stream (10) is combined with a gaseous carrier stream (15) in a mixing vessel or device. (120), where the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material is dispersed in the gaseous carrier to generate a dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed stream (20). In one embodiment, the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material is atomized in the gaseous carrier to generate an atomized heavy hydrocarbon feed stream.


Dispersion can take place via conventional means, for example, in an online mixer with static mixers to mix the feed stream flowing at a specific rate with appropriate amount of steam injected to create a steam-rich dispersion of feed, or the dispersion can be created via injection nozzles as part of feed inlet (116) to reactor (100/200).


Suitable gaseous carriers include, for example, steam, carbon dioxide, syngas (mixtures containing carbon monoxide and hydrogen), inert gases such as nitrogen, and mixtures of the above. Typically, the gaseous carrier will be steam, or mixtures of a predominant or substantial portion of steam with, optionally, minor amounts of one or more of the other gases mentioned above. In one embodiment, the gaseous carrier stream is steam mixed with carbon dioxide, desirably under such conditions that the carbon dioxide is supercritical.


Gaseous carrier stream (15) will typically be superheated, and liquid heavy hydrocarbon material stream (10) will be heated, to temperatures such that, after combination, the resulting dispersed heavy hydrocarbon stream (20) will be at an elevated temperature suitable for feeding into the reactor (100/200) without additional heating, but additional heating via conventional means may be utilized if needed. The temperature of dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed stream (20) will typically be about 900° F. (about 482° C.) or less, or about 850° F. (about 454° C.) or less, at the feed point (116) of dispersed heavy hydrocarbon stream into the reactor (100/200), to assist in minimizing premature coke formation and potential blockage of the feed point (116).


The pressure of the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed stream (20) should also be higher than at the feed point (116) of dispersed heavy hydrocarbon stream into the reactor (100/200). If necessary, dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed stream (20) may be compressed subsequent to mixing vessel (120) by conventional means as necessary prior to feeding into reactor (100/200).


Desirably, as indicated above, when carbon dioxide is used as, or as a component of, gaseous carrier stream (15), the temperature and pressure conditions of dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed stream (20) are such that the carbon dioxide is in a supercritical state.


Supplemental or make-up catalyst may also be included as part of dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed stream (20).


Reactor (100) from FIG. 1 contains a vertical bed (110) of an alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier into which the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed stream (20) is fed. Reactor (200) from FIG. 2 contains a horizontal bed (210) of the alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier onto which the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed stream (20) is fed.


The alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier is a carbon support containing an alkali metal catalyst and, optionally, one or more co-catalyst materials. Examples of suitable alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carriers include, for example, those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,958,957 and US2010/0121125A1. Further details are provided below.


A superheated gas stream (25) comprising steam and, optionally, hydrogen and carbon monoxide, is also fed into reactor (100/200). In one embodiment, superheated gas stream (25) comprises hydrogen and carbon monoxide. The hydrogen and carbon monoxide content of superheated gas stream (25) can be generated in a syngas generator, which can also be used for superheating superheated gas stream (25) or other process streams such as gaseous carrier stream (15) and/or dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed stream (20), as discussed below.


In reactor (100/200), the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon carbon feed is contacted with steam, hydrogen and carbon monoxide, and with bed (110/210) (in the presence of the alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier), where it is believed that a number of chemical and physical processes take place.


The result is the generation of a raw gaseous mixture comprising methane, one or both of ethylene and propylene (typically a mixture of both), and one or both of ethane and propane (typically a mixture of both), as well as minor amounts of additional hydrocarbon materials (saturated and/or unsaturated) of increasing molecular weight, and other optional components and contaminants as discussed below.


The temperature in reactor (100/200) will be from about 1100° F. (about 593° C.), or from about 1200° F. (about 649° C.), of from about 1250° F. (about 677° C.), to about 1400° F. (about 760° C.), or to about 1350° F. (about 732° C.).


The pressure in reactor (100/200) will be elevated (superatmospheric), typically from about 50 psig (about 446 kPa), or from about 100 psig (about 791 kPa), or from about 250 psig (about 1825 kPa), or from about 450 psig (about 3204 kPa), to about 1000 psig (about 6996 kPa), or to about 600 psig (about 4238 kPa), or to about 550 psig (about 3894 kPa).


The temperature and pressure conditions in reactor (100/200) appear to have a significant impact on the ultimate product mix (ethylene versus propylene, ethane versus propane); therefore, the desired product mix will be a significant factor in determining operating temperature and pressure conditions for reactor (100/200).


In addition to the generation of the raw gaseous mixture, a portion of the carbon content of the feed appears to deposit on the carbonaceous carrier as a solid, for example, as a coke. Again, temperature and pressure conditions in reactor (100/200) appear to have a significant impact on the amount of coke formation (versus conversion into the raw gaseous mixture), which again affects the ultimate raw gaseous mixture.


Also, depending on the conditions in reactor (100/200), a portion of the carbon content from the carbonaceous carrier material (original or deposited coke), as well as the heavy hydrocarbon feed, appears to gasify into a syngas mixture (carbon monoxide and hydrogen) or hydromethanates into a methane-enriched synthesis gas (methane, carbon monoxide and hydrogen), which may be further methanated or otherwise converted in reactor (100/200) as part of the raw gaseous mixture. Gasification/hydromethanation can be promoted in reactor (100/200), for example, in a portion of bed (110/210) (not depicted) or a separate section of reactor (100/200) (not depicted), or in a separate reactor (not depicted), as discussed below.


Desirably, the reactions in reactor (100/200) are balanced in that the amount of carbon material depositing on the carbonaceous carrier material is substantially balanced with the amount of material being removed from carbonaceous carrier material. In practice, however, alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier material will be periodically removed from reactor (100/200), for example via bleed stream (35), and fresh and/or regenerated alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier material will be fed into reactor (100/200), for example via catalyst feed line (40). Regeneration of alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier material can take place, for example, in a separate gasification/hydromethanation reactor as discussed below.


Without being bound to any particular theory, it is believe that all of these mechanisms (including optional partial oxidation mentioned below, and possibly others) contribute to the final raw gaseous mixture composition which, in addition to the hydrocarbon components, will typically also contain unconverted steam, as well as other optional components such as hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, depending on reaction conditions as well as the compositions of liquid heavy hydrocarbon material and the carbonaceous carrier.


The conversion of the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material in reactor (100/200) is overall endothermic. Additionally, there will be process heat losses, including those due to any required in situ heating of any feeds that may be provided to reactor (100/200) at a temperature lower than the operating temperature of reactor (100/200). Consequently, heat energy must be added to reactor (100/200) and/or generated in situ to maintain thermal balance. As defined above, the amount of heat energy that must be added to reactor (100/200) to maintain thermal balance is the heat demand of the reaction.


Optionally, an oxygen-rich stream (30) may also be fed into reactor (100/200), for example, to assist in temperature control, and/or to provide additional hydrogen and carbon monoxide in situ, as discussed below.


The resulting gaseous raw product stream (50) will typically be subject to one or more downstream processing steps including, for example, cooling/quenching and heat recovery, entrained solids separation, component separation (for example, to recover the olefins content, ammonia and hydrogen removal), component upgrading (for example, acid gas removal, desulfurization, shift and/or methanation) and component consumption (for example, combustion for power/steam/heat generation, and/or partial oxidation for syngas/heat/steam generation).


Additional details and embodiments are provided below.


Reactor (100/200)


Any of several types of gasification reactors can be utilized for reactor (100/200). Suitable reactors include those having a reaction chamber which is a counter-current fixed bed, a co-current fixed bed, a fluidized bed, or an entrained flow or moving bed reaction chamber.


Reactor (100) from FIG. 1 is in a vertical configuration, and is typically a fluidized-bed reactor. Reactor (100) can, for example, be a “flow down” countercurrent configuration (as specifically depicted in FIG. 1), where the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed (20) is introduced at a higher point so that there is some flow down of heavier components through bed (110), the gases (such as superheated gas feed stream (25)) flow in an upward direction and are removed at a removal point (118) above the fluidized bed, and heavier components (such as “spent” catalyst particles) are removed from a point near or below bed (110) (such as bleed line (35)). Alternatively, reactor (100) can be a “flow up” co-current configuration, where the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed (20) is fed at a lower point so that the flow is up bed (110), along with the gases (such as superheated gas feed stream (25)).


In both types of configurations for reactor (100), there will typically be a collection zone (112) at the bottom of reactor (100) for larger particles that are not fluidized, and a disengagement zone (114) at the top of reactor (100) to assist in disengagement of particulate matter from the raw gaseous mixture as it is withdrawn from reactor (100).


Reactor (200) from FIG. 2 is a horizontal configuration with a bed (120) that is a moving bed. Typically in such a configuration, the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feedstream (20), the superheated gas feed stream (25) and the catalyst feed line (40) are fed at a one end of reactor (200), and gaseous raw product stream (50) and catalyst bleed stream (35) are withdrawn at the other end of reactor (200).


Since reactor (100/200) is operated at elevated pressures and temperatures, catalyst bed removal and replenishment requires introduction and withdrawal of the appropriate carbonaceous carrier to and from a reaction chamber of reactor (100/200) under pressure. Those skilled in the art are familiar with feed inlets and outlets to supply and withdraw the carbonaceous carrier into and from reaction chambers having high pressure and/or temperature environments, including star feeders, screw feeders, rotary pistons and lock-hoppers. It should be understood that the inlets and outlets can include two or more pressure-balanced elements, such as lock hoppers, which would be used alternately. In some instances, the carbonaceous carrier can be prepared or regenerated at pressure conditions above the operating pressure of reactor (100/200) and, hence, the carbonaceous carrier can be directly passed into and removed from reactor (100/200) without further pressurization/depressurization. Gas for pressurization can be an inert gas such as nitrogen, or more typically a stream of superheated steam and/or carbon dioxide.


Gas flow velocities in reactor (100/200) are such to achieve a desired residence time in the reactor, which can vary widely.


In certain embodiments, the gas flow velocity in reactor (100/200), the feed point (116) of dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed (20) into reactor (100/200), and the removal point (118) of gaseous raw product stream (50) from reactor (100/200), is such that residence time of the vapor phase from any feed point (116) to any removal point (118) is of a short duration, such as less than about 2 seconds, or about 1.5 seconds or less, or about 1 second or less, or about 0.5 seconds or less. To achieve such short residence times, gas flow velocity will typically be about 50 ft/sec (about 15.2 m/sec) or higher, or about 60 ft/sec (about 18.3 m/sec) or higher.


In certain embodiments, longer residence times may be utilized, and typical gas flow velocities in reactor (100/200) can be from about 0.1 ft/sec (about 0.03 m/sec), or from about 0.5 ft/sec (about 0.15 m/sec), or from about 1 ft/sec (about 0.3 m/sec), to about 2.0 ft/sec (about 0.6 m/sec), or to about 1.5 ft/sec (about 0.45 m/sec).


In another embodiment, there are a plurality of feed points for the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed, wherein the residence time of the vapor phase from at least one feed point to any removal point is of a short duration, such as less than about 2 seconds, or about 1.5 seconds or less, or about 1 second or less, or about 0.5 seconds or less.


When an oxygen-rich gas stream (30) is also fed into reactor (100/200), a portion of the carbon content from the carbonaceous carrier and potentially the heavy hydrocarbon feedstock can also be consumed in an oxidation/combustion reaction, generating supplemental heat energy as well as carbon monoxide and hydrogen. The variation of the amount of oxygen supplied to reactor (100/200) can provide an advantageous process control. Increasing the amount of oxygen will increase the oxidation/combustion, and therefore increase in situ heat and syngas generation. Decreasing the amount of oxygen will conversely decrease the in situ heat and syngas generation.


When utilized, the oxygen-rich gas stream (30) can be fed into reactor (100/200) by any suitable means such as direct injection of purified oxygen, oxygen-air mixtures, oxygen-steam mixtures, or oxygen-inert gas mixtures into the reactor. See, for instance, U.S. Pat. No. 4,315,753 and Chiaramonte et al., Hydrocarbon Processing, September 1982, pp. 255-257.


The oxygen-rich gas stream (30) is typically generated via standard air-separation technologies, and may be fed as a high-purity oxygen stream (about 95% or greater volume percent oxygen, dry basis). Typically, however, the oxygen-rich gas stream will be provided as a mixture with steam, and introduced at a temperature of from about 400° F. (about 204° C.), or from about 450° F. (about 232° C.), or from about 500° F. (about 260° C.), to about 750° F. (about 399° C.), or to about 700° F. (about 371° C.), or to about 650° F. (about 343° C.), and at a pressure at least slightly higher than present in reactor (100/200).


When provided to a vertical fluid-bed reactor such as reactor (100), the oxygen-rich gas stream (30) is typically introduced at a point below bed (110) in order to avoid formation of hot spots in the reactor, and to avoid combustion of the gaseous products. The oxygen-rich gas stream (30) can, for example, advantageously be introduced into a collection zone (112) of reactor (100), where non-fluidized particles collect, typically in the bottom of the reactor (for example, below a grid or plate (not depicted) at the bottom of reactor (100)), so that carbon in the non-fluidized particles is preferentially consumed as opposed to carbon in a different zone of reactor (100).


When provided to reactor (200), the oxygen-rich gas stream (30) is typically introduced at the bottom bed (210) at a point with good particle flow in order to avoid formation of hot spots in reactor (200).


Without being bound by any particular theory of operation, under the operating conditions utilized in connection with the present invention, some level of hydromethanation/gasification also appears to occur in reactor (100/200). Hydromethanation/gasification can involve several different reactions including, for example:

Steam carbon: C+H2O→CO+H2  (I)
Water-gas shift: CO+H2O→H2+CO2  (II)
CO Methanation: CO+3H2→CH4+H2O  (III)
Hydro-gasification: 2H2+C→CH4  (IV)


In the hydromethanation reaction, the first three reactions (I-III) predominate to result in the following overall reaction:

2C+2H2O→CH4+CO2  (V).


In hydromethanation, carbon monoxide and hydrogen are generated and consumed in relative balance, so a hydromethanation reaction in and of itself will generate a methane-enriched synthesis gas.


In a standard steam gasification reaction, reaction (I) predominates. If oxygen is available, partial combustion/oxidation may also occur.


Hydromethanation is a catalytic process and, as indicated above, appears to occur to some extent in the presence of the alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier. Standard gasification is a typically non-catalytic (thermal process), but reaction (I) can be promoted by the presence of an alkali metal catalyst.


At the temperature and pressure conditions in reactor (100/200), hydromethanation will generally predominate over conventional gasification in bed (110/210). Hydromethanation conditions are generally disclosed in various references as incorporated in the “Catalyst Bed Recycle/Regeneration” section below.


Desirably, conditions in reactor (100/200) are such that at least a portion of carbon content of the alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier (either original carbon content or, more desirably, coke deposited on the carrier) hydromethanates to increase the methane content of the raw gaseous mixture and, ultimately, the gaseous raw product stream (50) withdrawn from reactor (100/200).


In certain embodiments, it is desirable that the reaction conditions are such that the deposition of carbon material on, and consumption (via gasification, hydromethanation, combustion and/or partial oxidation) of carbon from, the alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier is in substantial balance.


In other embodiments, it is desirable that the reaction conditions are such that the deposition of carbon material on the alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier is greater than the consumption of carbon from the alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier. In such a case, alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier can be removed from reactor (100/200) via bleed line (35) where it can be regenerated, for example, via gasification, hydromethanation, combustion and/or partial oxidation of carbon from the alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier in a separate reactor (not depicted), such as in separate a hydromethantion reactor as disclosed in various references as incorporated in the “Catalyst Bed Recycle/Regeneration” section below.


As indicated above, the reactions that take place in reactor (100/200) have a syngas demand, a steam demand and a heat demand. These conditions in combination are important factors in determining the operating conditions for reactor (100/200) as well as the other parts of the process.


Typically, the overall weight ratio of steam:liquid heavy hydrocarbon feed supplied to reactor (100/200) is about 0.5 or greater, or about 0.75 or greater, or about 1 or greater, or about 1.5 (or greater), to about 6 (or less), or to about 5 (or less), or to about 4 (or less), or to about 3 (or less), or to about 2 (or less). The steam demand should be satisfied by steam in the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon stream (20), superheated gas feed stream (25) and (if present) oxygen-rich stream (30); however, if needed, additional steam may also be added to reactor (100/200) apart from these streams.


Advantageously, steam for the process is generated from other process operations through process heat capture (such as generated in a waste heat boiler, generally referred to as “process steam” or “process-generated steam”) and, in some embodiments, is solely supplied as process-generated steam. For example, process steam streams generated by a heat exchanger unit or waste heat boiler, and/or from other downstream gas processing steps such as shifting and/or methanating syngas content that may be present in gaseous raw product stream (50), can ultimately be fed to reactor (100/200).


In certain embodiments, the overall process described herein is at least substantially steam neutral, such that steam demand (pressure and amount) for the reaction can be satisfied via heat exchange with process heat at the different stages therein, or steam positive, such that excess steam is produced and can be used, for example, for power generation. Desirably, process-generated steam accounts for greater than about 95 wt %, or greater than about 97 wt %, or greater than about 99 wt %, or about 100 wt % or greater, of the steam demand of the hydromethanation reaction.


As also indicated above, heat must be added to reactor (100/200), as the reaction in reactor (100/200) is endothermic, plus there will be process heat losses. The addition of the superheated feed gas stream (25) and dispersed heavy hydrocarbon stream (20), plus the optional partial in situ combustion/oxidation of carbon in the presence of the oxygen introduced into reactor (100/200) from oxygen-rich gas stream (30) (if present), should be sufficient to substantially satisfy the heat demand of the reaction.


The temperature in reactor (100/200) can be controlled, for example, by controlling the amount and temperature of the superheated feed gas stream (25), as well as the amount of optional oxygen or separately-supplied superheated steam (as discussed above), supplied to reactor (100/200).


The result of the overall process is a raw product, which is withdrawn from reactor (100/200) as gaseous raw product stream (50) typically comprising more than trace amounts of methane, ethane, propane, ethylene and propylene, as well as unreacted steam, entrained fines and, optionally, other components and contaminants such as hydrogen, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, depending on the nature of the carbonaceous material utilized for the feedstock and carbonaceous carrier.


The gaseous raw product stream (50), upon exiting the reactor (100/200), will typically comprise at least about 30 mol % (dry basis) of lower alkanes (methane+ethane+propane), and/or at least about 8 mol % lower olefins (ethylene+propylene).


Alkali Metal-Impregnated Carbonaceous Material and Bed (110/210)


The alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous material used in bed (110/210) is a particulate carbonaceous carrier material, such as particulate biomass and/or non-biomass, that contains an amount of alkali metal effective to catalyze the reactions that take place in reactor (100/200) such that the methane, ethane, propane, ethylene and propylene are the predominant hydrocarbon gaseous products resulting from the reactions.


The carbonaceous carrier can be prepared via crushing and/or grinding one or more carbonaceous materials, either separately or together, according to any methods known in the art, such as impact crushing and wet or dry grinding to yield one or more carbonaceous particulates. Depending on the method utilized for crushing and/or grinding of the carbonaceous material sources, the resulting carbonaceous particulates may be sized (i.e., separated according to size) to provide the an appropriate carbonaceous carrier for use in reactor (100/200).


Any method known to those skilled in the art can be used to size the particulates. For example, sizing can be performed by screening or passing the particulates through a screen or number of screens. Screening equipment can include grizzlies, bar screens, and wire mesh screens. Screens can be static or incorporate mechanisms to shake or vibrate the screen. Alternatively, classification can be used to separate the carbonaceous particulates. Classification equipment can include ore sorters, gas cyclones, hydrocyclones, rake classifiers, rotating trommels or fluidized classifiers. The carbonaceous materials can be also sized or classified prior to grinding and/or crushing.


Typically, the carbonaceous carrier is supplied as a fine particulate having an average particle size of from about 25 microns, or from about 45 microns, up to about 2500 microns, or up to about 500 microns. One skilled in the art can readily determine the appropriate particle size for the carbonaceous particulates. For example, when a fluidized bed reactor is used, such carbonaceous particulates can have an average particle size which enables incipient fluidization of the carbonaceous materials at the gas velocity used in the fluidized bed reactor.


Desirable particle size ranges for bed (110) are in the Geldart A and Geldart B ranges (including overlap between the two), depending on fluidization conditions, typically with limited amounts of fine (below about 25 microns) and coarse (greater than about 250 microns) material.


Desirable particle size ranges for bed (210) range from about 40 microns, or from about 200 microns, or from about 400 microns, up to about 2000 microns, or up to about 1000 microns, or up to about 800 microns, typically with limited amounts of fine and coarse material.


The alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous material can also, for example, be a hydromethanation char by-product, such as resulting from the various hydromethanation processes disclosed in the previously incorporated references. See, for example, previously incorporated US2010/0121125A1.


When a fresh carbon particulate (such as, for example, an activated carbon support) is utilized, catalyst may be loaded onto that materials as disclosed, for example, in previously incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 3,958,957, or as described for the preparation of particulate carbonaceous materials for hydromethanation processes. See, for example, US2009/0048476A1, US2010/0168495A1 and US2010/0168494A1.


Typically, the alkali metal, it is present in the catalyzed particulate in an amount sufficient to provide a ratio of alkali metal atoms to carbon atoms in the catalyzed particulate ranging from about 0.01, or from about 0.05, or from about 0.1, or from about 0.2, to about 1, or to about 0.8, or to about 0.6, or to about 0.5.


Suitable alkali metals are lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, and mixtures thereof. Particularly useful are potassium sources. Suitable alkali metal compounds include alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, formates, oxalates, amides, hydroxides, acetates, or similar compounds. For example, the catalyst can comprise one or more of sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, rubidium carbonate, lithium carbonate, cesium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, rubidium hydroxide or cesium hydroxide, and particularly, potassium carbonate and/or potassium hydroxide.


Optional co-catalysts or other catalyst additives may be utilized, such as those disclosed in the hydromethanation references incorporated below in the “Catalyst Bed Recycle/Regeneration” section.


Catalyst Bed Recycle/Regeneration


In fluidized bed reactor such as reactor (100), a portion of the bed (110) will typically need to be removed and replaced from time to time as buildup of contaminants occurs. The amount and frequency of bed turnover will predominantly be a factor of how much coke deposits and remains on the carbonaceous carrier. Other factors include, for example, the amount of ash and other contaminant content of the liquid heavy hydrocarbon feed that may deposit on the carrier particles or otherwise “tie-up” the catalyst component.


In a moving bed reactor such as reactor (200), a portion of bed (210) will be removed and recirculated. Again, the amount and frequency of bed turnover will predominantly be a factor of how much coke deposits and remains on the carbonaceous carrier.


The carbonaceous carrier can be periodically or continuously withdrawn from the reactor (100/200) through an outlet such as a lock hopper system, although other methods are known to those skilled in the art.


As indicated above, one method of removing coke deposits from the alkali-metal carbonaceous carrier is to hydromethanate carbon from the carrier particles to a methane-enriched synthesis gas and a char by-product. The char by-product can be removed from a hydromethanation reactor (not depicted) and recycled back to the reactor (100/200) via catalyst feed line (40).


Catalytic gasification/hydromethanation processes and conditions are disclosed, for example, in, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,828,474, U.S. Pat. No. 3,998,607, U.S. Pat. No. 4,057,512, U.S. Pat. No. 4,092,125, U.S. Pat. No. 4,094,650, U.S. Pat. No. 4,204,843, U.S. Pat. No. 4,468,231, U.S. Pat. No. 4,500,323, U.S. Pat. No. 4,541,841, U.S. Pat. No. 4,551,155, U.S. Pat. No. 4,558,027, U.S. Pat. No. 4,606,105, U.S. Pat. No. 4,617,027, U.S. Pat. No. 4,609,456, U.S. Pat. No. 5,017,282, U.S. Pat. No. 5,055,181, U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,465, U.S. Pat. No. 6,790,430, U.S. Pat. No. 6,894,183, U.S. Pat. No. 6,955,695, US2003/0167961A1, US2006/0265953A1, US2007/0000177A1, US2007/0083072A1, US2007/0277437A1, US2009/0048476A1, US2009/0090056A1, US2009/0090055A1, US2009/0165383A1, US2009/0166588A1, US2009/0165379A1, US2009/0170968A1, US2009/0165380A1, US2009/0165381A1, US2009/0165361A1, US2009/0165382A1, US2009/0169449A1, US2009/0169448A1, US2009/0165376A1, US2009/0165384A1, US2009/0217582A1, US2009/0220406A1, US2009/0217590A1, US2009/0217586A1, US2009/0217588A1, US2009/0218424A1, US2009/0217589A1, US2009/0217575A1, US2009/0229182A1, US2009/0217587A1, US2009/0246120A1, US2009/0259080A1, US2009/0260287A1, US2009/0324458A1, US2009/0324459A1, US2009/0324460A1, US2009/0324461A1, US2009/0324462A1, US2010/0121125A1, US2010/0120926A1, US2010/0071262A1, US2010/0168495A1, US2010/0168494A1, US2010/0292350A1, US2010/0287836A1, US2010/0287835A1, US2011/0031439A1, US2011/0062012A1, US2011/0062722A1, US2011/0064648A1, US2011/0088896A1, US2011/0088897A1, WO2010/048493A2 and GB1599932; U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/970,105 (entitled INTEGRATED ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PROCESS) and 12/970,111 (entitled INTEGRATED ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PROCESS), each of which was filed 16 Dec. 2010; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/031,486 (entitled INTEGRATED HYDROMETHANATION FUEL CELL POWER GENERATION), filed 21 Feb. 2011; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/039,995 (entitled INTEGRATED HYDROMETHANATION FUEL CELL POWER GENERATION), filed 3 Mar. 2011; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/094,438 (entitled HYDROMETHANATION OF A CARBONACEOUS FEEDSTOCK WITH VANADIUM RECOVERY), filed 26 Apr. 2011.


The methane-enriched synthesis gas after processing can be used, for example, as a feed for a syngas generator as described below, or can be otherwise purified/treated/utilized as described in the above-incorporated hydromethanation references.


The coke deposits can also be removed from the alkali-metal carbonaceous carrier via thermal gasification, such as disclosed in previously incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 3,816,298.


The solids resulting from both hydromethanation and thermal gasification will be hot, and can be recirculated back to the reactor (100/200) as hot solids. Doing so will reduce the heat demand of the reactions in the reactor (100/200).


Gas Processing


The gaseous raw product stream (50) exiting the reactor (100/200) will be at the approximate operating temperature and pressure of the reactor (100/200).


Typically, the gaseous raw product stream (50) will first be quenched to a temperature to stop reactions that might consume olefins, such as less than about 1100° F. (about 593° C.), and then subject to solids separation to removed entrained solids. The quenching and solids removal can take place in any fashion known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art such as, for example, in a fines remover unit (not pictured) incorporated into and/or external of reactor (100/200). Quenching can occur via heat exchange, and solids removal can occur via contact, with an aqueous (steam or water) and/or organic medium (such as a pyrolysis oil or addition resid feedstock) in, for example, a single or multistage cyclone, with the resulting quenched gaseous raw product stream be sent on for further processing, and the quenching medium and separated solids being return to the reactor (100/200) for further processing.


Additional stages of fines removal subsequent to quench can occur, for example, in additional cyclone separators optionally followed by Venturi scrubbers.


Additional heat energy can be removed from the quenched gaseous raw product stream via one or more heat exchanger units, and the recovered heat energy can be used to generate steam for use elsewhere in the process.


Depending on the desired end product, the quenched gaseous raw product stream can be subject to additional processing steps generally known to those of ordinary skill in the art, for example, olefin separation, desulfurization, acid gas removal, water/gas shift and methanation.


In one embodiment, the olefins and acid gases are removed from the quenched gaseous raw product stream, and at least a portion of the resulting sweetened gas stream is fed to a syngas generator, such as a partial oxidation reactor, to reform/partially oxidize hydrocarbon content to additional hydrogen and carbon monoxide content, and heat energy, that can be used to generate superheated gas feed stream (25). A portion of the resulting sweetened gas stream can also be used for generating heat energy (for example, via combustion or external methanation) for superheating and/or steam generation.


In one embodiment, the syngas generator utilizes a gas-fed partial oxidation/reforming process, such as non-catalytic gaseous partial oxidation, catalytic autothermal reforming or catalytic stream-methane reforming process. These processes are generally well-known in the relevant art. See, for example, Rice and Mann, “Autothermal Reforming of Natural Gas to Synthesis Gas, Reference: KBR Paper #2031,” Sandia National Laboratory Publication No. SAND2007-2331 (2007); and Bogdan, “Reactor Modeling and Process Analysis for Partial Oxidation of Natural Gas”, printed by Febodruk, B. V., ISBN: 90-365-2100-9 (2004).


Technologies and reactors potentially suitable for use in conjunction with the present invention are commercially available from Royal Dutch Shell plc, Siemens AG, General Electric Company, Lurgi AG, Haldor Topsoe A/S, Uhde AG, KBR Inc. and others.


In non-catalytic gaseous partial oxidation and autothermal reforming, an oxygen-rich gas stream is fed into the syngas generator along with gas feed stream. Optionally, steam may also be fed into the syngas generator. In steam-methane reforming, steam is fed into the reactor along with gas feed stream. In some cases, minor amounts of other gases such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen and/or nitrogen may also be fed into the syngas generator.


Reaction and other operating conditions, and equipment and configurations, of the various reactors and technologies are in a general sense known to those of ordinary skill in the relevant art, and are not critical to the present invention in its broadest sense.


In addition to generating syngas, the reaction in the syngas generator will also generate heat energy. As indicated above, a portion of this heat energy may optionally be recovered and used, for example, to generate process steam from boiler feed water, or alternatively heat/superheat other process streams.


Multi-Train Processes


In the processes of the invention, each process may be performed in one or more processing units. For example, one or more reactors may be supplied with the feedstock from one or more feedstock preparation unit operations. Similarly, the raw product gas streams generated by one or more reactors may be processed or purified separately or via their combination in one or more gas processing units.


In certain embodiments, the processes utilize two or more reactors (e.g., 2-4 reactors). In such embodiments, the processes may contain divergent processing units (i.e., less than the total number of reactors) or convergent processing units (i.e., less than the total number of reactors) prior to the reactors for ultimately providing the feedstock and superheated gas stream to the plurality of reactors; and/or divergent or convergent processing units following the reactors for processing the raw gaseous product streams generated by the plurality of reactors.


When the systems contain convergent processing units, each of the convergent processing units can be selected to have a capacity to accept greater than a 1/n portion of the total feed stream to the convergent processing units, where n is the number of convergent processing units. Similarly, when the systems contain divergent processing units, each of the divergent processing units can be selected to have a capacity to accept greater than a 1/m portion of the total feed stream supplying the convergent processing units, where m is the number of divergent processing units.


Examples of Specific Embodiments

A specific embodiment of the process is one in which the process is a continuous process, in which steps (a), (b), (d) and (e) are operated in a continuous manner.


Another specific embodiment is one in which the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material is fed into the reactor at one or more feed points, the gaseous raw product stream is withdrawn from the reactor at one or more withdrawal points, and there is a vapor residence time from a feed point to a withdrawal point of less than about 2 seconds.


Another specific embodiment is one in which the gaseous carrier predominantly comprises, or substantially comprises, superheated steam, or a mixture of superheated steam with carbon dioxide.


In another specific embodiment, the superheated gas stream comprises carbon monoxide and hydrogen from a gas-based syngas generator, for example, one that utilizes a non-catalytic partial oxidation process or an autothermal reforming process, wherein an oxygen-rich gas stream is fed into the syngas generator along with a methane-containing feed. In one embodiment, the methane-containing feed comprises methane from the gaseous raw product stream. In another embodiment, the gaseous raw product stream is processed to remove a substantial portion of the olefin content to generate an olefin-depleted product stream, and at least a portion of the olefin-depleted product stream is fed to the syngas generator as the methane-containing feed.


Another specific embodiment is one in which an oxygen-rich gas stream is supplied periodically or continuously to the reactor, and the amount of oxygen provided is varied as a process control, for example, to assist control of the temperature in reactor. As oxygen is supplied to the reactor, carbon is partially oxidized/combusted to generate heat energy (as well as typically some amounts of carbon monoxide and hydrogen). The amount of oxygen supplied to the reactor can be increased or decreased to increase the amount of carbon being consumed and, consequently, the amount of heat energy being generated, in situ in the reactor. In such a case, this heat energy generated in situ reduces the heat demand of the reaction, and thus the amount of heat energy supplied in the superheated gas feed stream.


Another specific embodiment is one in which at least a portion of the heat energy is recovered from the gaseous raw product stream, and at least a portion of the recovered heat energy is used to generate steam for use in the process.


Another specific embodiment is one in which a bleed stream of the bed is withdrawn from the reactor, the bleed stream is hydromethanated to generate a methane-enriched synthesis gas stream and a by-product char. In one embodiment, at least a portion of the methane-enriched synthesis gas is used as a methane-containing feed for a syngas generator. In another embodiment, at least a portion of the by-product char is return to the reactor as recycle catalyst bed.


Another specific embodiment is one in which a bleed stream of the bed is withdrawn from the reactor, and the bleed stream is gasified to generate a syngas stream comprising hydrogen, carbon monoxide and heat energy. In one embodiment, the superheated gas feed stream comprises at least a portion of the syngas stream.


EXAMPLES

A 2 inch ID, 4 foot tall column was filled with a carbon char (900 g) impregnated with a potassium catalyst. The char was derived from a powder river basin (PRB) coal, and contained a K/C content of about 0.29. One run was also made with uncatalyzed activated carbon as the bed material.


A petroleum residue having the following approximate composition was utilized: C=89.3%; H=8.6%; S=1.8%; N=0.4%; V=80 ppm.


The carbon char was fluidized in the bed by flowing a superheated gas mixture of steam, hydrogen, carbon monoxide and nitrogen into the bottom of the column.


The petroleum residue was atomized by mixing with superheated steam, and fed into the column at 1300° F.


The temperature in the reactor was about 1300° F., and gas velocity was about 0.4-1.25 foot/sec, resulting in a residence time of about 1 sec for the atomized residue feed.


Each run lasted about 2 hours due to plugging of the feed injection port due to coke formation.


After each run, the captured gases were analyzed for hydrocarbon species using an infrared spectroscopy (IR) and a gas chromatography (GC). A carbon balance was also performed on the recovered gas and bed material. Typically, a carbon balance of >90% was achieved.


Example 1

A first run was made at 1300° F. and 150 psig to compare the effects of a catalyzed bed versus an uncatalyzed bed. Table 1 provides the results.











TABLE 1






Uncatalyzed Bed Yield
Catalyzed Bed Yield


Component
(scf/lb residue feed)
(scf/lb residue feed)

















CH4
6.5
12.4


C2H4
Trace
 0.8


C2H6
0.9
 2.2


C3H6
Trace
 0.4


C3H8
Trace
 0.5


C4+
Trace
 0.1









As can be seen from the results, the presence of the catalyst in the bed material had a significant effect on the conversion of the feedstock to lower olefins and alkanes.


Example 2

Four runs were made with the catalyzed bed at the conditions mentioned above, but at varying pressures—50 psig, 150 psig, 295 psig and 500 psig.


The results are provided in Tables 2 and 3.















TABLE 2








Fraction
Fraction
Fraction
Fraction




(mol %)
(mol %)
(mol %)
(mol %)



Component
50 psig
150 psig
295 psig
500 psig






















CH4
19
24
33
39



C2H4
13
8
2
1



C2H6
10
23
27
38



C3H6
3
7
8
12



C3H8
10
8
2
1



C4+
1
3
2
3



Coke (deposited
43
27
26
5



on bed)





















TABLE 3






Yield
Yield
Yield
Yield



(scf/lb feed)
(scf/lb feed)
(scf/lb feed)
(scf/lb feed)


Component
50 psig
150 psig
295 psig
500 psig



















CH4
5.61
7.06
9.66
10.55


C2H4
1.95
1.23
0.33
0.20


C2H6
1.53
3.31
3.97
5.14


C3H6
0.28
0.68
0.76
1.06


C3H8
0.94
0.76
0.17
0.10


C4+
0.10
0.23
0.15
0.21









As can be seen from the results, pressure has a significant impact on product distribution. Advantageously, higher pressures appear to lead to reduced coke formation and, consequently, higher overall desirable product yield per unit of feed (light alkanes and olefins).

Claims
  • 1. A process for generating a gaseous raw product stream from a liquid heavy hydrocarbon material, the process comprising the steps of: (a) dispersing the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material in a gaseous carrier to produce a dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed;(b) introducing a superheated gas feed stream comprising heat energy and steam, and optionally carbon monoxide and hydrogen, into a reactor containing a bed of an alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier;(c) optionally introducing an oxygen-rich stream into the reactor to generate heat energy and, optionally, carbon monoxide and hydrogen in situ;(d) contacting the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed with steam, carbon monoxide and hydrogen in the presence of the bed of the alkali metal-impregnated carbonaceous carrier, at an elevated pressure and at a temperature of from about 1100° F. to about 1400° F., to generate a raw gaseous mixture comprising methane, one or both of ethylene and propylene, and one or both of ethane and propane; and(e) withdrawing a stream of the raw gaseous mixture from the reactor as the gaseous raw product stream,wherein the reaction in step (d) has a syngas demand, and the syngas demand is at least substantially satisfied by carbon monoxide and hydrogen that may be present in the superheated gas feed stream, and by carbon monoxide and hydrogen that may be generated in step (c).
  • 2. The process of claim 1, wherein the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material is fed into the reactor at one or more feed points, the gaseous raw product stream is withdrawn from the reactor at one or more withdrawal points, and there is a vapor residence time from a feed point to a withdrawal point of less than about 2 seconds.
  • 3. The process of claim 1, wherein the raw gaseous product stream comprises at least about 30 mol % methane+ethane+propane (dry basis).
  • 4. The process of claim 1, wherein the raw gaseous product stream comprises at least about 8 mol % ethylene+propylene (dry basis).
  • 5. The process of claim 1, wherein the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material is atomized in the gaseous carrier to produce the dispersed heavy hydrocarbon feed.
  • 6. The process of claim 1, wherein the gaseous carrier predominantly comprises superheated steam.
  • 7. The process of claim 1, wherein the elevated pressure is up to about 1000 psig.
  • 8. The process of claim 1, wherein the elevated pressure is up to about 600 psig.
  • 9. The process of claim 1, wherein an oxygen-rich gas stream is fed into the reactor.
  • 10. The process of claim 9, wherein the amount of oxygen provided is varied as a process control to assist control of the temperature in the reactor.
  • 11. The process of claim 1, wherein the reactor comprises a collection zone in the bottom of the reactor, and an oxygen-rich gas stream is fed into the collection zone.
  • 12. The process of claim 1, wherein the superheated gas stream comprises carbon monoxide and hydrogen from a gas-based syngas generator.
  • 13. The process of claim 1, wherein a gas-based syngas generator is used to generate the superheated gas stream.
  • 14. The process of claim 12, wherein the syngas generator utilizes a non-catalytic gaseous partial oxidation process or an autothermal reforming process.
  • 15. The process of claim 13, wherein the syngas generator utilizes a non-catalytic gaseous partial oxidation process or an autothermal reforming process.
  • 16. The process of claim 1, wherein heat energy is recovered from the gaseous raw product stream, and at least a portion of the recovered heat energy is used to generate steam for use in the process.
  • 17. The process of claim 1, wherein a bleed stream of the bed is withdrawn from the reactor, and the bleed stream is hydromethanated to generate a methane-enriched synthesis gas stream and a by-product char.
  • 18. The process of claim 17, wherein at least a portion of the by-product char is returned to the reactor as recycle catalyst bed.
  • 19. The process of claim 1, wherein a bleed stream of the bed is withdrawn from the reactor, and the bleed stream is gasified to generate a syngas stream comprising hydrogen, carbon monoxide and heat energy.
  • 20. The process of claim 1, wherein the liquid heavy hydrocarbon material comprises a material selected form the group consisting of vacuum resids; atmospheric resids; heavy and reduced petroleum crude oils; pitch, asphalt and bitumen; tar sand oil; shale oil; bottoms from catalytic cracking processes; and coal liquefaction bottoms.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/349,462 (filed 28 May 2010), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein for all purposes as if fully set forth.

US Referenced Citations (375)
Number Name Date Kind
2605215 Coghlan Jul 1952 A
2694623 Welty, Jr. et al. Nov 1954 A
2791549 Jahnig May 1957 A
2813126 Tierney Nov 1957 A
2860959 Pettyjohn et al. Nov 1958 A
2886405 Benson et al. May 1959 A
3034848 King May 1962 A
3114930 Oldham et al. Dec 1963 A
3150716 Strelzoff et al. Sep 1964 A
3164330 Neidl Jan 1965 A
3351563 Negra et al. Nov 1967 A
3435590 Smith Apr 1969 A
3531917 Grunewald et al. Oct 1970 A
3544291 Schlinger et al. Dec 1970 A
3594985 Ameen et al. Jul 1971 A
3615300 Holm et al. Oct 1971 A
3689240 Aldridge et al. Sep 1972 A
3740193 Aldridge et al. Jun 1973 A
3746522 Donath Jul 1973 A
3759036 White Sep 1973 A
3779725 Hegarty et al. Dec 1973 A
3814725 Zimmerman et al. Jun 1974 A
3817725 Sieg et al. Jun 1974 A
3828474 Quartulli Aug 1974 A
3833327 Pitzer et al. Sep 1974 A
3847567 Kalina et al. Nov 1974 A
3876393 Kasai et al. Apr 1975 A
3904386 Graboski et al. Sep 1975 A
3915670 Lacey et al. Oct 1975 A
3920229 Piggott Nov 1975 A
3929431 Koh et al. Dec 1975 A
3958957 Koh et al. May 1976 A
3966875 Bratzler et al. Jun 1976 A
3969089 Moss et al. Jul 1976 A
3971639 Matthews Jul 1976 A
3972693 Wiesner et al. Aug 1976 A
3975168 Gorbaty Aug 1976 A
3985519 Kalina et al. Oct 1976 A
3989811 Hill Nov 1976 A
3996014 Muller et al. Dec 1976 A
3998607 Wesswlhoft et al. Dec 1976 A
3999607 Pennington et al. Dec 1976 A
4005996 Hausberger et al. Feb 1977 A
4011066 Bratzler et al. Mar 1977 A
4017272 Anwer et al. Apr 1977 A
4021370 Harris et al. May 1977 A
4025423 Stonner et al. May 1977 A
4044098 Miller et al. Aug 1977 A
4046523 Kalina et al. Sep 1977 A
4052176 Child et al. Oct 1977 A
4053554 Reed et al. Oct 1977 A
4057512 Vadovic et al. Nov 1977 A
4069304 Starkovish et al. Jan 1978 A
4077778 Nahas et al. Mar 1978 A
4091073 Winkler May 1978 A
4092125 Stambaugh et al. May 1978 A
4094650 Koh et al. Jun 1978 A
4100256 Bozzelli et al. Jul 1978 A
4101449 Noda et al. Jul 1978 A
4104201 Banks et al. Aug 1978 A
4113615 Gorbaty Sep 1978 A
4116996 Huang Sep 1978 A
4118204 Eakman et al. Oct 1978 A
4152119 Schulz May 1979 A
4157246 Eakman et al. Jun 1979 A
4159195 Clavenna Jun 1979 A
4162902 Wiesner et al. Jul 1979 A
4173465 Meissner et al. Nov 1979 A
4189307 Marion Feb 1980 A
4193771 Sharp et al. Mar 1980 A
4193772 Sharp Mar 1980 A
4200439 Lang Apr 1980 A
4204843 Neavel May 1980 A
4211538 Eakman et al. Jul 1980 A
4211669 Eakman et al. Jul 1980 A
4219338 Wolfs et al. Aug 1980 A
4223728 Pegg Sep 1980 A
4225457 Schulz Sep 1980 A
4235044 Cheung Nov 1980 A
4243639 Haas et al. Jan 1981 A
4249471 Gunnerman Feb 1981 A
4252771 Lagana et al. Feb 1981 A
4260421 Brown et al. Apr 1981 A
4265868 Kamody May 1981 A
4270937 Adler et al. Jun 1981 A
4284416 Nahas Aug 1981 A
4292048 Wesselhoft et al. Sep 1981 A
4298584 Makrides Nov 1981 A
4315753 Bruckenstein et al. Feb 1982 A
4315758 Patel et al. Feb 1982 A
4318712 Lang et al. Mar 1982 A
4322222 Sass Mar 1982 A
4330305 Kuessner et al. May 1982 A
4331451 Isogaya et al. May 1982 A
4334893 Lang Jun 1982 A
4336034 Lang et al. Jun 1982 A
4336233 Appl et al. Jun 1982 A
4341531 Duranleau et al. Jul 1982 A
4344486 Parrish Aug 1982 A
4347063 Sherwood et al. Aug 1982 A
4348486 Calvin et al. Sep 1982 A
4348487 Goldstein et al. Sep 1982 A
4353713 Cheng Oct 1982 A
4365975 Williams et al. Dec 1982 A
4372755 Tolman et al. Feb 1983 A
4375362 Moss Mar 1983 A
4385905 Tucker May 1983 A
4397656 Ketkar Aug 1983 A
4400182 Davies et al. Aug 1983 A
4407206 Bartok et al. Oct 1983 A
4428535 Venetucci Jan 1984 A
4432773 Euker, Jr. et al. Feb 1984 A
4433065 Van Der Burgt et al. Feb 1984 A
4436028 Wilder Mar 1984 A
4436531 Estabrook et al. Mar 1984 A
4439210 Lancet Mar 1984 A
4443415 Queneau et al. Apr 1984 A
4444568 Beisswenger et al. Apr 1984 A
4459138 Soung Jul 1984 A
4462814 Holmes et al. Jul 1984 A
4466828 Tamai et al. Aug 1984 A
4468231 Bartok et al. Aug 1984 A
4478425 Benko Oct 1984 A
4478725 Velling et al. Oct 1984 A
4482529 Chen et al. Nov 1984 A
4491609 Degel et al. Jan 1985 A
4497784 Diaz Feb 1985 A
4500323 Siegfried et al. Feb 1985 A
4505881 Diaz Mar 1985 A
4508544 Moss Apr 1985 A
4508693 Diaz Apr 1985 A
4515604 Eisenlohr et al. May 1985 A
4515764 Diaz May 1985 A
4524050 Chen et al. Jun 1985 A
4540681 Kustes et al. Sep 1985 A
4541841 Reinhardt Sep 1985 A
4551155 Wood et al. Nov 1985 A
4558027 McKee et al. Dec 1985 A
4572826 Moore Feb 1986 A
4594140 Cheng Jun 1986 A
4597775 Billimoria et al. Jul 1986 A
4597776 Ullman et al. Jul 1986 A
4604105 Aquino et al. Aug 1986 A
4609388 Adler et al. Sep 1986 A
4609456 Deschamps et al. Sep 1986 A
4617027 Lang Oct 1986 A
4619864 Hendrix et al. Oct 1986 A
4620421 Brown et al. Nov 1986 A
4661237 Kimura et al. Apr 1987 A
4668428 Najjar May 1987 A
4668429 Najjar May 1987 A
4675035 Apffel Jun 1987 A
4678480 Heinrich et al. Jul 1987 A
4682986 Lee et al. Jul 1987 A
4690814 Velenyi et al. Sep 1987 A
4696678 Koyama et al. Sep 1987 A
4699632 Babu et al. Oct 1987 A
4704136 Weston et al. Nov 1987 A
4720289 Vaugh et al. Jan 1988 A
4747938 Khan May 1988 A
4781731 Schlinger Nov 1988 A
4803061 Najjar et al. Feb 1989 A
4808194 Najjar et al. Feb 1989 A
4810475 Chu et al. Mar 1989 A
4822935 Scott Apr 1989 A
4848983 Tomita et al. Jul 1989 A
4854944 Strong Aug 1989 A
4861346 Najjar et al. Aug 1989 A
4861360 Apffel Aug 1989 A
4872886 Henley et al. Oct 1989 A
4876080 Paulson Oct 1989 A
4892567 Yan Jan 1990 A
4960450 Schwarz et al. Oct 1990 A
4995193 Soga et al. Feb 1991 A
5017282 Delbianco et al. May 1991 A
5055181 Maa et al. Oct 1991 A
5057294 Sheth et al. Oct 1991 A
5059406 Sheth et al. Oct 1991 A
5074357 Haines Dec 1991 A
5093094 Van Kleeck et al. Mar 1992 A
5094737 Bearden, Jr. et al. Mar 1992 A
5132007 Meyer et al. Jul 1992 A
5223173 Jeffrey Jun 1993 A
5225044 Breu Jul 1993 A
5236557 Muller et al. Aug 1993 A
5250083 Wolfenbarger et al. Oct 1993 A
5277884 Shinnar et al. Jan 1994 A
5388645 Puri et al. Feb 1995 A
5388650 Michael Feb 1995 A
5435940 Doering et al. Jul 1995 A
5536893 Gudmundsson Jul 1996 A
5566755 Seidle et al. Oct 1996 A
5616154 Elliott et al. Apr 1997 A
5630854 Sealock, Jr. et al. May 1997 A
5641327 Leas Jun 1997 A
5660807 Forg et al. Aug 1997 A
5669960 Couche Sep 1997 A
5670122 Zamansky et al. Sep 1997 A
5720785 Baker Feb 1998 A
5733515 Doughty et al. Mar 1998 A
5769165 Bross et al. Jun 1998 A
5776212 Leas Jul 1998 A
5788724 Carugati et al. Aug 1998 A
5855631 Leas Jan 1999 A
5865898 Holtzapple et al. Feb 1999 A
5968465 Koveal et al. Oct 1999 A
6013158 Wootten Jan 2000 A
6015104 Rich, Jr. Jan 2000 A
6028234 Heinemann et al. Feb 2000 A
6032737 Brady et al. Mar 2000 A
6090356 Jahnke et al. Jul 2000 A
6119778 Seidle et al. Sep 2000 A
6132478 Tsurui et al. Oct 2000 A
6180843 Heinemann et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187465 Galloway Feb 2001 B1
6379645 Bucci et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389820 Rogers et al. May 2002 B1
6419888 Wyckoff Jul 2002 B1
6506349 Khanmamedov Jan 2003 B1
6506361 Machado et al. Jan 2003 B1
6602326 Lee et al. Aug 2003 B2
6641625 Clawson et al. Nov 2003 B1
6653516 Yoshikawa et al. Nov 2003 B1
6692711 Alexion et al. Feb 2004 B1
6790430 Lackner et al. Sep 2004 B1
6797253 Lyon Sep 2004 B2
6808543 Paisley Oct 2004 B2
6830597 Green Dec 2004 B1
6855852 Jackson et al. Feb 2005 B1
6878358 Vosteen et al. Apr 2005 B2
6894183 Choudhary et al. May 2005 B2
6955595 Kim Oct 2005 B2
6955695 Nahas Oct 2005 B2
6969494 Herbst Nov 2005 B2
7074373 Warren et al. Jul 2006 B1
7077202 Shaw et al. Jul 2006 B2
7100692 Parsley et al. Sep 2006 B2
7118720 Mendelsohn et al. Oct 2006 B1
7132183 Galloway Nov 2006 B2
7168488 Olsvik et al. Jan 2007 B2
7205448 Gajda et al. Apr 2007 B2
7220502 Galloway May 2007 B2
7299868 Zapadinski Nov 2007 B2
7309383 Beech, Jr. et al. Dec 2007 B2
7481275 Olsvik et al. Jan 2009 B2
7666383 Green Feb 2010 B2
7677309 Shaw et al. Mar 2010 B2
7758663 Rabovitser et al. Jul 2010 B2
7897126 Rappas et al. Mar 2011 B2
7901644 Rappas et al. Mar 2011 B2
7922782 Sheth Apr 2011 B2
7926750 Hauserman Apr 2011 B2
7976593 Graham Jul 2011 B2
8114176 Nahas Feb 2012 B2
8114177 Hippo et al. Feb 2012 B2
8123827 Robinson Feb 2012 B2
8163048 Rappas et al. Apr 2012 B2
8192716 Raman et al. Jun 2012 B2
8202913 Robinson et al. Jun 2012 B2
8268899 Robinson et al. Sep 2012 B2
8286901 Rappas et al. Oct 2012 B2
8297542 Rappas et al. Oct 2012 B2
8328890 Reiling et al. Dec 2012 B2
8349037 Steiner et al. Jan 2013 B2
8349039 Robinson Jan 2013 B2
8361428 Raman et al. Jan 2013 B2
8366795 Raman et al. Feb 2013 B2
8479833 Raman Jul 2013 B2
8479834 Preston Jul 2013 B2
8502007 Hippo et al. Aug 2013 B2
20020036086 Minkkinen et al. Mar 2002 A1
20030070808 Allison Apr 2003 A1
20030131582 Anderson et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030167691 Nahas Sep 2003 A1
20040020123 Kimura et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040023086 Su et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040123601 Fan Jul 2004 A1
20040180971 Inoue et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040256116 Olsvik et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050107648 Kimura et al. May 2005 A1
20050137442 Gajda et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050192362 Rodriguez et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050287056 Baker et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050288537 Maund et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060149423 Barnicki et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060228290 Green Oct 2006 A1
20060231252 Shaw et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060265953 Hobbs Nov 2006 A1
20060272813 Olsvik et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070000177 Hippo et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070051043 Schingnitz Mar 2007 A1
20070083072 Nahas Apr 2007 A1
20070180990 Downs et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070186472 Rabovister et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070220810 Leveson et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070227729 Zubrin et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070237696 Payton Oct 2007 A1
20070277437 Sheth Dec 2007 A1
20070282018 Jenkins Dec 2007 A1
20080141591 Kohl Jun 2008 A1
20080289822 Betzer Tsilevich Nov 2008 A1
20090012188 Rojey et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090048476 Rappas et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090090055 Ohtsuka Apr 2009 A1
20090090056 Ohtsuka Apr 2009 A1
20090165361 Rappas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090165376 Lau et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090165379 Rappas Jul 2009 A1
20090165380 Lau et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090165381 Robinson Jul 2009 A1
20090165382 Rappas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090165383 Rappas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090165384 Lau et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090166588 Spitz et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090169448 Rappas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090169449 Rappas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090170968 Nahas et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090173079 Wallace et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090217575 Raman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217582 May et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217584 Raman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217585 Raman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217586 Rappas et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217587 Raman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217588 Hippo et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090217589 Robinson Sep 2009 A1
20090217590 Rappas et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090218424 Hauserman Sep 2009 A1
20090220406 Rahman Sep 2009 A1
20090229182 Raman et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090235585 Neels et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090236093 Zubrin et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090246120 Raman et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090259080 Raman et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090260287 Lau Oct 2009 A1
20090305093 Biollaz et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324458 Robinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324459 Robinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324460 Robinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324461 Robinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324462 Robinson et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100018113 Bohlig et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100050654 Chiu et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100071235 Pan et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100071262 Robinson et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100076235 Reiling et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100120926 Robinson et al. May 2010 A1
20100121125 Hippo et al. May 2010 A1
20100159352 Gelin et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100168494 Rappas et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100168495 Rappas et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100179232 Robinson et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100287835 Reiling et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287836 Robinson et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100292350 Robinson et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110031439 Sirdeshpande et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110062012 Robinson Mar 2011 A1
20110062721 Sirdeshpande et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110062722 Sirdeshpande et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110064648 Preston et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110088896 Preston Apr 2011 A1
20110088897 Raman Apr 2011 A1
20110146978 Perlman Jun 2011 A1
20110146979 Wallace Jun 2011 A1
20110207002 Powell et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110217602 Sirdeshpande Sep 2011 A1
20110262323 Rappas et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110294905 Robinson et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120046510 Sirdeshpande Feb 2012 A1
20120060417 Raman et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120102836 Raman et al. May 2012 A1
20120102837 Raman et al. May 2012 A1
20130042824 Sirdeshpande Feb 2013 A1
20130046124 Sirdeshpande Feb 2013 A1
20130172640 Robinson et al. Jul 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (162)
Number Date Country
966660 Apr 1975 CA
1003217 Jan 1977 CA
1041553 Oct 1978 CA
1106178 Aug 1981 CA
1 125 026 Jun 1982 CA
1187702 Jun 1985 CA
1282243 Apr 1991 CA
1299589 Apr 1992 CA
1332108 Sep 1994 CA
2673121 Jun 2008 CA
2713642 Jul 2009 CA
1477090 Feb 2004 CN
101555420 Oct 2009 CN
2 210 891 Mar 1972 DE
2210891 Sep 1972 DE
2852710 Jun 1980 DE
3422202 Dec 1985 DE
100610607 Jun 2002 DE
819 Apr 2000 EA
0024792 Mar 1981 EP
0 067 580 Dec 1982 EP
102828 Mar 1984 EP
0 138 463 Apr 1985 EP
0 225 146 Jun 1987 EP
0 259 927 Mar 1988 EP
0473153 Mar 1992 EP
0 723 930 Jul 1996 EP
1 001 002 May 2000 EP
1004746 May 2000 EP
1136542 Sep 2001 EP
1 207 132 May 2002 EP
1 741 673 Jun 2006 EP
1768207 Mar 2007 EP
2058471 May 2009 EP
797 089 Apr 1936 FR
2 478 615 Sep 1981 FR
2906879 Apr 2008 FR
593910 Oct 1947 GB
640907 Aug 1950 GB
676615 Jul 1952 GB
701 131 Dec 1953 GB
760627 Nov 1956 GB
798741 Jul 1958 GB
820 257 Sep 1959 GB
996327 Jun 1965 GB
1033764 Jun 1966 GB
1448562 Sep 1976 GB
1453081 Oct 1976 GB
1467219 Mar 1977 GB
1467995 Mar 1977 GB
1 599 932 Jul 1977 GB
1560873 Feb 1980 GB
2078251 Jan 1982 GB
2154600 Sep 1985 GB
2455864 Jun 2009 GB
53-94305 Aug 1978 JP
53-111302 Sep 1978 JP
54020003 Feb 1979 JP
54-150402 Nov 1979 JP
55-12181 Jan 1980 JP
56-145982 Nov 1981 JP
56157493 Dec 1981 JP
60-35092 Feb 1985 JP
60-77938 May 1985 JP
62241991 Oct 1987 JP
62 257985 Nov 1987 JP
03-115491 May 1991 JP
2000290659 Oct 2000 JP
2000290670 Oct 2000 JP
2002105467 Apr 2002 JP
2004292200 Oct 2004 JP
2004298818 Oct 2004 JP
2006 169476 Jun 2006 JP
0018681 Apr 2000 WO
WO 0043468 Jul 2000 WO
WO 0240768 May 2002 WO
WO 02079355 Oct 2002 WO
02103157 Dec 2002 WO
03018958 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03033624 Apr 2003 WO
2004055323 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004072210 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2006031011 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2007005284 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007047210 Apr 2007 WO
2007068682 Jun 2007 WO
2007077137 Jul 2007 WO
2007077138 Jul 2007 WO
2007083072 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007076363 Jul 2007 WO
WO 2007128370 Nov 2007 WO
2007143376 Dec 2007 WO
WO 2007143376 Dec 2007 WO
2008058636 May 2008 WO
WO 2008073889 Jun 2008 WO
2008087154 Jul 2008 WO
2009018053 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009018053 Feb 2009 WO
WO 2009048723 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009048724 Apr 2009 WO
WO 2009086361 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086362 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086363 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086366 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086367 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086370 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086372 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086374 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086377 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086383 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086407 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009086408 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009111330 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2009111331 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2009111332 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2009111335 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2009111342 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2009111345 Sep 2009 WO
WO 2009124017 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2009124019 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2009158576 Dec 2009 WO
WO 2009158579 Dec 2009 WO
WO 2009158580 Dec 2009 WO
WO 2009158582 Dec 2009 WO
WO 2009158583 Dec 2009 WO
WO 2010033846 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010033848 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010033850 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010033852 Mar 2010 WO
WO 2010048493 Apr 2010 WO
WO 2010078297 Jul 2010 WO
WO 2010078298 Jul 2010 WO
2010132549 Nov 2010 WO
WO 2010132551 Nov 2010 WO
2011017630 Feb 2011 WO
2011029278 Mar 2011 WO
2011029282 Mar 2011 WO
2011029283 Mar 2011 WO
2011029284 Mar 2011 WO
2011029285 Mar 2011 WO
2011034888 Mar 2011 WO
2011034889 Mar 2011 WO
2011034891 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011034890 Mar 2011 WO
2011049858 Apr 2011 WO
2011049861 Apr 2011 WO
2011063608 Jun 2011 WO
2011084580 Jul 2011 WO
2011084581 Jul 2011 WO
2011106285 Sep 2011 WO
2011139694 Nov 2011 WO
2011150217 Dec 2011 WO
WO 2012024369 Feb 2012 WO
2012033997 Mar 2012 WO
2012061235 May 2012 WO
2012061238 May 2012 WO
2012116003 Aug 2012 WO
2012145497 Oct 2012 WO
2012166879 Dec 2012 WO
2013025808 Feb 2013 WO
2013025812 Feb 2013 WO
2013052553 Apr 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (46)
Entry
A.G. Collot et al., “Co-pyrolysis and co-gasification of coal and biomass in bench-scale fixed-bed and fluidized bed reactors”, (1999) Fuel 78, pp. 667-679.
Wenkui Zhu et al., “Catalytic gasification of char from co-pyrolysis of coal and biomass”, (2008) Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 89, pp. 890-896.
Chiesa P. et al., “Co-Production of hydrogen, electricity and C02 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions”, (2005) International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 30, No. 7, pp. 747-767.
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From a Thermally Ballasted Gasifier”, DOE Hydrogen Program Contractors' Review meeting, May 18-21, 2003, Center for Sustainable Environmental Technologies Iowa State University.
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From A thermally Ballasted Gasifier”, Final Technical Report, Iowa State University, Aug. 2005.
Chiaramonte et al, “Upgrade Coke by Gasification”, (1982) Hydrocarbon Processing, vol. 61 (9), pp. 255-257 (Abstract only).
Gerdes, Kristin, et al., “Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Performance and Cost Assessment,” National Energy Technology Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Mar. 27, 2009, pp. 1-26.
Ghosh, S., et al., “Energy Analysis of a Cogeneration Plant Using Coal Gasification and Solid Oxide Fuel Cell,” Energy, 2006, vol. 31, No. 2-3, pp. 345-363.
Jeon, S.K., et al., “Characteristics of Steam Hydrogasification of Wood Using A Micro-Batch Reactor,” Fuel, 2007, vol. 86, pp. 2817-2823.
Li, Mu, et al., “Design of Highly Efficient Coal-Based Integrated Gasification Fuel Cell Power Plants,” Journal of Power Sources, 2010, vol. 195, pp. 5707-5718.
Prins, M.J., et al., “Exergetic Optimisation of a Production Process of Fischer-Tropsch Fuels from Biomass,” Fuel Processing Technology, 2005, vol. 86, No. 4, pp. 375-389.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/484,918, filed May 31, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/402,022, filed Feb. 22, 2012.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/450,995, filed Apr. 19, 2012.
Asami, K., et al., “Highly Active Iron Catalysts from Ferric Chloride or the Steam Gasification of Brown Coal,” ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 32, No. 8, 1993, pp. 1631-1636.
Berger, R., et al., “High Temperature CO2-Absorption: A Process Offering New Prospects in Fuel Chemistry,” The Fifth International Symposium on Coal Combustion, Nov. 2003, Nanjing, China, pp. 547-549.
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From A Thermally Ballasted Gasifier,” Aug. 2005.
Brown et al., “Biomass-Derived Hydrogen From A Thermally Ballasted Gasifier,” DOE Hydrogen Program Contractors' Review Metting, Center for Sustainable Environmental Technologies, Iowa State University, May 21, 2003.
Cohen, S.J., Project Manager, “Large Pilot Plant Alternatives for Scaleup of the Catalytic Coal Gasification Process,” FE-2480-20, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No. EX-76-C-01-2480, 1979.
Euker, Jr., C.A., Reitz, R.A., Program Managers, “Exxon Catalytic Coal-Gasification-Process Development Program,” Exxon Research & Engineering Company, FE-2777-31, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No. ET-78-C-01-2777, 1981.
Kalina, T., Nahas, N.C., Project Managers, “Exxon Catalaytic Coal Gasification Process Predevelopment Program,” Exxon Research & Engineering Company, FE-2369-24, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Contract No. E(49-18)-2369, 1978.
Nahas, N.C., “Exxon Catalytic Coal Gasification Process—Fundamentals to Flowsheets,” Fuel, vol. 62, No. 2, 1983, pp. 239-241.
Ohtsuka, Y. et al., “Highly Active Catalysts from Inexpensive Raw Materials for Coal Gasification,” Catalysis Today, vol. 39, 1997, pp. 111-125.
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al, “Steam Gasification of Low-Rank Coals with a Chlorine-Free Iron Catalyst from Ferric Chloride,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 30, No. 8, 1991, pp. 1921-1926.
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al., “Calcium Catalysed Steam Gasification of Yalourn Brown Coal,” Fuel, vol. 65, 1986, pp. 1653-1657.
Ohtsuka, Yasuo, et al, “Iron-Catalyzed Gasification of Brown Coal at Low Temperatures,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 1, No. 1, 1987, pp. 32-36.
Ohtsuka, Yasuo, et al., “Ion-Exchanged Calcium From Calcium Carbonate and Low-Rank Coals: High Catalytic Activity in Steam Gasification,” Energy & Fuels 1996, 10, pp. 431-435.
Ohtsuka, Yasuo et al., “Steam Gasification of Coals with Calcium Hydroxide,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 9, No. 6, 1995, pp. 1038-1042.
Pereira, P., et al., “Catalytic Steam Gasification of Coals,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 6, No. 4, 1992, pp. 407-410.
Ruan Xiang-Quan, et al., “Effects of Catalysis on Gasification of Tatong Coal Char,” Fuel, vol. 66, Apr. 1987, pp. 568-571.
Tandon, D., “Low Temperature and Elevated Pressure Steam Gasification of Illinois Coal,” College of Engineering in the Graduate School, Southern Illinois university at Carbondale, Jun. 1996.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,538, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,548, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/778,552, filed May 12, 2010, Robinson, et al.
Coal Data: A Reference, Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric, and Alternate Fuels U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-0064(93), Feb. 1995.
Deepak Tandon, Dissertation Approval, “Low Temperature and Elevated Pressure Steam Gasification of Illinois Coal”, Jun. 13, 1996.
Demibras, “Demineralization of Agricultural Residues by Water Leaching”, Energy Sources, vol. 25, pp. 679-687, (2003).
Gallagher Jr., et al., “Catalytic Coal Gasification for SNG Manufacture”, Energy Research, vol. 4, pp. 137-147, (1980).
Heinemann, et al., “Fundamental and Exploratory Studies of Catalytic Steam Gasification of Carbonaceous Materials”, Final Report Fiscal Years 1985-1994.
Jensen, et al. Removal of K and C1 by leaching of straw char, Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 20, pp. 447-457, (2001).
Meyers, et al. Fly Ash as A Construction Material for Highways, A Manual. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-IP-76-16, Washington, DC, 1976.
Natural Gas Processing: The Crucial Link Between Natural Gas Production and Its Transportation to Market. Energy Information Administration, Office of Oil and Gas; pp. 1-11, (2006).
Prins, et al., “Exergetic optimisation of a production process of Fischer-Tropsch fuels from biomass”, Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 86, pp. 375-389, (2004).
Moulton, Lyle K. “Bottom Ash and Boiler Slag”, Proceedings of the Third International Ash Utilization Symposium, U.S. Bureau of Mines, Information Circular No. 8640, Washington, DC, 1973.
Hydromethanation Process, GreatPoint Energy, Inc., from World Wide Web <http://greatpointenergy.com/ourtechnology.php.> accessed Sep. 5, 2013.
Sigma-Aldrich “Particle Size Conversion Table” (2004); from World Wide Web <http:/www.sigmaaldrich.com/chemistry/learning-center/technical-library/particle-size-conversion.printerview.html>.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110294905 A1 Dec 2011 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61349462 May 2010 US