The invention relates to shipping support structure for large machinery and, more particularly, to a shipping support structure that allows for large machinery such as a turbine or the like to meet at least one shipping criteria that would not otherwise be feasible using a standard shipping support.
Advances in turbine technology have pushed turbine sizes larger. Turbine and other large machinery manufacturers ship product all over the world using every means of transport. Existing infrastructure, however, is not easily modified to accommodate the larger sized machines, resulting in difficulties in delivering product to final destinations. As such, when shipping large machinery such as heavy duty gas turbines, challenges arise to accommodate normal global shipping limits including height, width and weight limitations.
Currently, to enable shipment of these products to challenging locations, special and time-consuming circuitous routes or costly work-arounds are required. Often, the route is limited by one obstacle that presents the challenge, for example a low bridge or narrow passage. Existing methods for overcoming shipping envelope limits include adjustable rail cars or road vehicles that move laterally and vertically. Alternative route planning is also available to avoid constraining obstacles. These options, however, are not preferable because there are not many options for adjustable vessels, and these vessels also have limits. These options are also expensive to utilize. A single configuration shipping support could be designed to meet the most challenging obstacle on a route without being configurable; however, this solution would compromise other requirements or be higher in cost.
It would be desirable to overcome these drawbacks and enable heavy machinery to be shipped in the most economical route with minimal delay.
In an exemplary embodiment, a shipping stand for large machinery includes a primary support structure with first components that are configured to support the large machinery during a shipping operation, and a secondary support structure attachable to the large machinery and cooperative with the primary support structure. The secondary support structure includes second components that are configured to support the large machinery during the shipping operation. The shipping stand is selectively configurable between a full support configuration using both the primary support structure and the secondary support structure and a discrete support configuration using only the secondary support structure. At least one physical characteristic of the shipping stand is varied between the full support configuration and the discrete support configuration.
In another exemplary embodiment, a progressive shipping stand includes a stage one assembly, and a stage two assembly, where the stage one assembly and the stage two assembly together define a first profile, and where the stage two assembly alone defines a second profile, smaller than the first profile. The stage two assembly is attachable directly to a load. The stage two assembly is operable independently in a discrete support configuration and is selectively cooperable with the stage one assembly in a full support configuration.
In yet another exemplary embodiment, a method of shipping large machinery using a shipping stand includes the steps of positioning the large machinery and the secondary support structure on the primary support structure; and before or during shipping, modifying at least one physical characteristic of the shipping stand by removing the primary support structure such that the large machinery is supported only on the secondary support structure.
With reference to the drawings, embodiments of the invention relate to a shipping support structure comprised of at least two configurations, where a primary support structure is used for a majority of shipping transport modes, while a secondary support structure is selectively used in a restricted or challenging mode or segment. In some embodiments, the primary support structure and the secondary support structure are used together in a full support configuration. The primary support structure can be removed, leaving the secondary support structure to support the machinery in a discrete support configuration. The discrete support configuration can reduce the overall shipping height by several inches, enabling passage under a height constraint obstacle. In other embodiments, special configurations could temporarily reduce the width or weight of the overall shipment as well.
The primary support structure may be referred to as a stage one assembly, and the secondary support structure may be referred to as a stage two assembly. The stage one assembly and the stage two assembly together define a first profile, and the stage two assembly alone defines a second profile, smaller than the first profile. In some embodiments, the stage two assembly is attachable directly to a load and is operable independently in the discrete support configuration. The stage two assembly is selectively cooperable with the stage one assembly in the full support configuration.
With reference to
In some embodiments, the primary support structure 12 includes a front end base member 16, a rear end base member 18, and supporting rails 20 disposed between the front end base 16 and the rear end base 18. The rear end base 18 is shown in
The stand may additionally include a pair of stand legs 26 (one shown in
With reference to
The progressive shipping stand of the described embodiments enables heavy machinery to be shipped through challenging routes and frees continued technology development for size increases without shipping limitations. The shipping stand enables shorter and quicker shipments for heavy machinery, thereby reducing shipping costs. The stand allows for more options for shipping routes and enables more destinations to be achieved economically.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4660796 | Garrec | Apr 1987 | A |
4735310 | Lemery et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
5816367 | Lilja | Oct 1998 | A |
6000903 | Hatch et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6170141 | Rossway | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6793458 | Kawai et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7311338 | Osterloh | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7810799 | McGloghlon | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7963542 | Doll et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8876448 | Hess et al. | Nov 2014 | B1 |
20090072564 | Teeple | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20120224944 | Boulanger et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140013768 | Laing | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20150176751 | Spratt | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2015022350 | Feb 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with corresponding EP Application No. 17172572.4 dated Oct. 24, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170349368 A1 | Dec 2017 | US |