I. Field
This invention generally concerns with communications, more particularly, it relates to exchanging and processing of information in a communication session with a plurality of session components.
II. Background
Advances in telecommunications allow multimedia sessions to be carried over the Internet via different network accesses. It is not unusual, for example, within one communication session, a plurality of session components are conducted through a single network access. For instance, in a communication session, a number of video and audio session components can be carried out simultaneously through a single network access. These multimedia session components are quite often data intensive. Occasionally, some session components need to be transferred to another network for various reasons. The reason can be due to, for instance, costs, availability of support, and network loading, etc.
Heretofore, transfers of session components among different networks have be problematic, if at all possible.
Accordingly, there is a need to provide an efficient scheme for the transfer of communication session components reliably so as to maintain continuity of communication sessions.
In a multimedia communication session with multiple media components, one or more media components can be transferred from one access network to another access network and yet maintain the continuity of the overall communication session. Each session is first identified and thereafter the media component intended to be transferred is also identified. The identities of the identified session and component are sent to one or more entities within the communication network for executing the media component transfer.
These and other features and advantages will be apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, taken together with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention. Details are set forth in the following description for purpose of explanation. It should be appreciated that one of ordinary skill in the art would realize that the invention may be practiced without the use of these specific details. In other instances, well known structures and processes are not elaborated in order not to obscure the description of the invention with unnecessary details. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited by the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded with the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
Furthermore, in the following description, for reasons of conciseness and clarity, terminology associated with the Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA) standards, as promulgated under the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is used. It should be emphasized that the invention is also applicable to other technologies, such as technologies and the associated standards related to Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA), Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA), Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA), Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) and so forth. Terminologies associated with different technologies can vary. For example, depending on the technology considered, a User Equipment (UE) used in the WCDMA standards can sometimes be called an Access Terminal (AT), a user terminal, a Mobile Station (MS), a subscriber unit, a User Equipment (UE), etc., to name just a few. Likewise, a Access Network (AN) used in the WCDMA standards can sometimes be called an access point, an Access Node (AN), a Node B, a Base Station (BS) and so forth. It should here be noted that different terminologies apply to different technologies when applicable.
Reference is directed to
In
In this example, the AN 12 is a Long Term Evolution (LTE) communication network capable of providing Internet Protocol (IP) connectivity to multimedia services offered by a IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) 30. The AN 12 comprises different network entities such as the Mobility Manager Entity (MME) 32, a Node B 34, a Serving Gateway (SGW) 36, and a PDN Gateway (PGW) 38. A user entity, such as the UE 22 which in a mobile device in this example, communicates with the Node B 34 wirelessly at the radio link level.
The AN 14 is a WLAN network, for example, a network operating under the IEEE 802.11 standards and other wireless local area network technologies. The AN 14 comprises, among other things, an Access Point (AP) 27. Another user entity, such as another UE 26 can communicate with the AP 27 wirelessly for access of a backbone network 20, for example.
The AN 16 is yet another network, for instance, a CDMA2000 network. The AN 16 includes, among other things, a Packet Data Service Node (PDSN) 29, and Access Node (AS) 31 and a Serving Radio Network Controller (SRNC) 33. As yet another user entity, such as another UE 25, can communicate with the AN 31 wirelessly for access of the backbone network 20, for instance.
In
In
It should be noted that the types of ANs as described above are merely exemplary. Connections to the IMS core network 30 by other types of ANs are clearly possible.
In the following description, terminology and protocols associated with signaling and data exchanges according to the IMS standards are used. The fundamentals of the IMS standards can be found in a publication, entitled “Internet Protocol (IP) multimedia call control protocol based on Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) and Session Description Protocol (SDP),” 3GPP TS 24.229, published by the 3GPP.
Suppose initially, there is the UE 22 which corresponds with another UE 25 via the IMS core network 30. The UE 22 gains access to the IMS core network 30 through the AN 12. Likewise, the UE 25 gains access to the IMS core network 30 via the AN 16.
In the IMS core network 30, it includes a Proxy Call Session Control Function (P-CSCF) server 40, a Serving Call Session Control Function (C-CSCF) server 42, an Session Continuity (SC) Server (AS) 46 and other IMS entities 44. The Session Continuity (SC) server 46 is one type of application server within the IMS core network 30 that provides functionalities to allow seamless session transfer of communication sessions between different accesses. In this example, to maintain IMS session continuity, all the IMS sessions are anchored at the SC server 46.
In this exemplary embodiment, suppose initially the UE 22 is having an IMS session with the UE 25 with multiple multimedia components. In this specification and the appended claims, the term “multi” or “multiple” means more than one. As previously mentioned, the IMS session is anchored at the SC server 46. An example of such a session can be the UE 22 is conducting a video conference with the UE 25 having multiple voice and video streams. For purposes of description, suppose there are three session components, namely, voice #1, video #2, and video #3, in the communication session. For instance, video #2 can be a face-to-face video of the users of the UEs 22 and 25, and video #3 can be a product demonstration video of a product.
Hereinbelow, the terms “session component,” “media component,” communication component,” “multimedia component,” and sometimes simply “component” are used interchangeably.
Suppose in this example, the UE 22 is mobile and capable of accessing multiple ANs, such as the ANs 12, 14 and 16. When the UE 22 is roaming among the different ANs, it is highly desirable for the UE 22 to be able to transfer an IMS communication session, or any component of the session, from one AN to another AN.
For purposes of illustration, suppose in the example, the UE 22 initially communicates with the UE 25 via the LTE AN 12 with the aforementioned three media components, voice #1, video #2 and video #3. When the UE 22 can gain access to the WLAN AN 14, the UE 22 can have the option of transferring the media component video #3 to the WLAN AN 14 but maintain the other media components voice #1 and video #2 with the LTE AN 12, as an example.
Described below are schemes for facilitating session and session component transfers from one AN to another AN via the SC server 46.
An IMS user entity, such as the UE 22, is allowed to establish multiple multimedia sessions with multiple correspondents as mentioned above. For instance, the UE 22 may have the above-mentioned IMS session with the UE 25, while at the same time, the UE 22 may also have another IMS session with the UE 26. To enable session transfer, all the multimedia sessions are anchored at the IMS SC server 46, which facilitates session transfer for the UE 22 in its home IMS network. When the UE 22 requests the SC server 46 to transfer some of the media components within the session currently in process with the UE 25 to one or more other ANs, the UE 22 needs to clearly identify and indicate that the session with the media components for the transfer as the intended session and not any other session. In this example, the intended session is the session the UE 22 communicating with the UE 25 with the three media components, voice #1, video #2 and video #3, as aforementioned. It is not any other session, if any, the UE 22 may also communicate with the UE 26, for instance.
In order to distinguish the different sessions, the IMS SC server 46 assigns a unique ID (Identity) to each session the UE 22 is conducting with a particular remote end user entity. This unique ID which is called a STI (Session Transfer Identifier) in this exemplary embodiment can take the following format: a URI (User Resource Identification) such as SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) URI, a telephone URI, a SIP dialog ID (Identifier) of the SIP dialog, and so forth. Describe below are schemes for transferring this identity information STI between the SC server 46 and the IMS UE 22.
Reference is now directed to
Suppose initially, the UE 22 starts the multimedia IMS session as mentioned above by sending a SIP INVITE message to the IMS core network 30 via the AN 12, as shown by the message path 48 shown in
If the UE 25 accepts the multi-component video conference session initiated by the UE 22, the UE 25 sends a 200 OK message back to the SC server 46, via the message path 54.
Upon receipt of the SIP INVITE message via the path 30 or 200 OK message via the path 54, the SC server 46 assigns a STI for the video conference session. The process is signified by the reference numeral 55 in
In this embodiment, the STI once assigned by the SC server 46 is conveyed to the UE 22 via a SIP response message, such as the 200 OK message sent to the UE 22 through the IMS core network 30 via the AN 12, over the message paths 56 and 58, respectively, as shown in
It should be noted that if the STI is in the form of the SIP dialog ID, there is no need to have any explicit header such as the “P-STI” header to send the STI to the UE 22 via the SIP message, such as the SIP 200 OK message sent via the paths 56 and 58, since the existent SIP message, such as the SIP 200 OK message, already supports the inclusion of the STI implicitly in different headers.
With the receipt of the STI, the UE 22 can use the STI to request for session transfer later and as will be further described below. Upon receipt of the 200 OK message, the UE 22 can send an acknowledgement message to the SC server 46 via the IMS core network 30 via the message paths 57 and 59, respectively.
It here should be noted that the messages and their flows described in all the embodiments can have variations and further can assume different names. For instances, it is possible for a called UE, e.g., the UE 25 in this case, to send an intermediate message, such as a 18× message, before sending the final 200 OK message.
Reference is now returned to
Suppose after receipt of the 200 OK message via the message paths 58 and 56, the UE 22 carries out the video conference with the UE 25. In essence, three media components are established. The three media components are denoted by the reference numerals 65, 67 and 69 for the session components voice #1, video #2 and video #3, respectively, as shown in
Suppose at a certain time in the midst of the video conference, the UE 22 decides to transfer a communication session component from the AN 12 to the AN 14. There may be many reasons for such a transfer. Exemplary reasons for the transfer may be based on factors such as, loading of the networks, costs, specific policies set by the networks, capabilities of the networks, preference of the UE user, to name just a few.
To initiate the session component transfer, the UE 22 sends a SIP INVITE message to the SC server 26 via the target AN 14 to the core IMS network 30 through the message paths 70 and 68, respectively, as shown in
If the STI, i.e., the STI with the content value as ABC as shown in
The SC server 46, upon receipt of the SIP INVITE message which includes the STI, can correlate the session transfer request received via the AN 14 with the original session established through the AN 12 in
If the STI is in the form of, for example, a SIP dialog ID rather than the straightforward SIP URI or telephone URI, several other schemes for conveying the STI to the SC server 46 are possible.
First, in the SIP INVITE message sent via the paths 68 and 70 as shown in
In another scheme, if the SIP dialog ID is used as the STI, then the SIP Replaces header can be used to carry the STI in the session transfer request. In addition, the Replaces header in the header of the SIP INVITE message can be added with a new header parameter. Normally, the Replaces header indicates that the identified session is to be replaced by the session transfer. However, the content of the new header parameter field can carry the information that this SIP request is a request for session transfer (e.g. only transfer part of the media components) instead of replacing. An example is as shown in
The IMS multimedia session may contain multiple media components as described in the above example. When performing session transfer, the IMS UE may choose to transfer only part of the session to the new access (e.g. video #3 out of the existing voice #1 and video #2). Described below are schemes for the IMS UE to indicate which media components to transfer.
Reference is now returned to
The UE 22 can identify the component to be transferred and inform the SC server 46. Again, there are several possible schemes.
First, included in body part of every SIP INVITE message (e.g., via the path 52) and the 200 OK message (e.g., via the path 54) in
In a first scheme for session component transfer, the media components in
The designated or index values can also be implicitly assigned. The designated values may not be explicitly carried within the SDP body itself during SIP offer/answer exchanges. However, the SDP bodies of the subsequent SIP messages always maintain the same order of listing of the media components. Each relevant entity, such as the SC Server 46 or the UEs 22 or 25, involved with the multi-component session can derive the designated values from the consistent order of listing of the media components in the subsequent SIP messages, which order of listing is the same as that of the initiating SIP message. For example, as shown in
Reference is returned to the first scheme of session component transfer. With the index or designated value either explicitly or implicitly assigned, when the UE 22 requests the transfer of one component, the video #3 in this example, the UE 22 can make the SC server 46 aware of such a request by sending the SC server 46 a message which includes the assigned designated value of the component (i.e., #3) within the original session via a new SDP attribute, in this example, “orig-mid,” as graphically and exemplarily shown in
As for the SC server 46, comparing the media descriptions of the previous and newly received SIP INVITE messages and scrutinizing the new attribute of each assigned index of the messages, the server 46 is aware of which component is to be transferred. The SC server 46 then takes action by transferring the indicated component to the new access while maintaining the remaining components on the original access.
In another scheme, instead of the methodology as described above, the UE 22 makes the SC server 46 aware of the components to be transferred by sending the SC server 46 a message without any explicit or implicit index value or any new SDP attribute. Instead, the UE 22 includes in the SDP body description for session transfer in a manner different from the previously described scheme.
Assuming initially the media components are specified in the body of the original SIP INVITE messages sent by the UE 22 via the message paths 48, 50 and 52 (
In this scheme, all the media components in the original session are included in the session transfer request sent via the paths 68 and 70 in the same order as they appear in the SDP agreed upon in the original session. For components that need not be transferred, the UE 22 assigned a predetermined value, e.g. “0”, to the port number corresponding to the media components. On the other hand, for components that need to be transferred, the UE 22 assigns the port number as in normal SDP offer/answer handling. Again, the UE 22 can convey such information in the SIP INVITE message, such as the message sent via the paths 68 and 70 shown in
Again, for the SC server 46, comparing the media descriptions of the previous and newly received SIP INVITE messages, because the new SIP INVITE requests for session transfer and indicates the predetermined value of 0 for the media components audio #1 and video #2, the SC server 46 understands that these two media components will not be transferred. The SC server 46 then only transfers the video component #3 to the new access, where this media component is assigned a port number “2008.”
The apparatus 90 comprises a central data bus 92 linking several circuits together. The circuits include a CPU (Central Processing Unit) or a controller 94, a receive circuit 96, a transmit circuit 98, and a memory unit 100.
If the apparatus 90 is part of a wireless device, the receive and transmit circuits 96 and 98 can be connected to a RF (Radio Frequency) circuit but is not shown in the drawing. The receive circuit 96 processes and buffers received signals before sending out to the data bus 92. On the other hand, the transmit circuit 98 processes and buffers the data from the data bus 92 before sending out of the device 90. The CPU/controller 94 performs the function of data management of the data bus 292 and further the function of general data processing, including executing the instructional contents of the memory unit 100.
The memory unit 100 includes a set of modules and/or instructions generally signified by the reference numeral 102. In this embodiment, the modules/instructions include, among other things, a section component management function 108 which carries out the schemes and processes as described above. The function 108 includes computer instructions or code for executing the process steps as shown and described in
In this embodiment, the memory unit 100 is a RAM (Random Access Memory) circuit. The exemplary functions, such as the handoff functions 108 and 110, are software routines, modules and/or data sets. The memory unit 100 can be tied to another memory circuit (not shown) which can either be of the volatile or nonvolatile type. As an alternative, the memory unit 300 can be made of other circuit types, such as an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Electrical Programmable Read Only Memory), a ROM (Read Only Memory), a magnetic disk, an optical disk, and others well known in the art.
Furthermore, the memory unit 100 can be an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). That is, the instructions or codes in the function 108 can be hard-wired or implemented by hardware, or a combination of hardware and software thereof.
In addition, the memory unit 100 can be a combination of ASIC and memory circuitry built of the volatile type and/or non-volatile type.
It should be further be noted that the inventive processes as described can also be coded as computer-readable instructions carried on any computer-readable medium known in the art. In this disclosure, the term “computer-readable medium” refers to any medium that participates in providing instructions to any processor, such as the CPU/controller 94 shown and described in the drawing figure of
Finally, other changes are possible within the scope of the invention. Other than as described above, any other logical blocks, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiment can be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or combinations thereof. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that theses and other changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention.
The present application for patent claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/073,902, entitled “Conveying Session Continuity Information in a Multi-Component Communication Session,” filed on Jun. 19, 2008, and assigned to the assignee hereof and expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6011909 | Newlin et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
7178047 | Chandley | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7228415 | Eschbach et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7574202 | Tsao et al. | Aug 2009 | B1 |
20030088676 | Smith et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040002330 | Chitrapu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030750 | Moore et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050185773 | Burger et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060026288 | Acharya et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060212511 | Garcia-Martin | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218399 | FitzGerald et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070058637 | Lo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070060123 | Maes | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070147244 | Rasanen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070192410 | Liversidge et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080064394 | Maes | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080080510 | Zancan | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080102832 | Sengupta et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080123560 | Nassor et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080126549 | Khanchandani et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080160991 | Constantinof et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080281971 | Leppanen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090017856 | Albertsson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090111471 | Li et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090116628 | Ropolyi | May 2009 | A1 |
20090254666 | Agulnik et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090257433 | Mutikainen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090323636 | Dillon et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100080133 | Oron | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100121961 | Elleuch et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20110113479 | Ganem | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1486062 | Mar 2004 | CN |
1832414 | Sep 2006 | CN |
2005099980 | Apr 2005 | JP |
WO2008048753 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO2009124943 | Oct 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
3GPP: “3rd Generation Partnership Project;Technical Specification Group Services and Architecture;Feasibility Study on Multimedia Session Continuity; Stage 2(Release 8)” 3GPP Draft; 23893-200, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre ; 650, Route Des Lucioles ; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, vol. TSG SA, no. Prague, Czech Republic; 20080602, Jun. 2, 2008, XP050211170 [retrieved on Jun. 2, 2008] Chapter 6.4.1, 6.5.1.3, 6.5.2.4a,b. |
Garcia-Martin Nokia M: “Input 3rd-Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Release 5 Requirements on the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP); rfc4083.txt” IETF Standard, Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF, CH, May 1, 2005, XP015041916 ISSN: 0000-0003 paragraph [4.18.2]. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion PCT/US2009/048036, International Search Authority—European Patent Office—Dec. 10, 2009. |
3GPP: “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and Architecture;IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) Sevice Continuity; Stage 2(Release 8)” 3GPP Draft; 23237-100, SRD Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre ; 650, Route Des Lucioles ; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, vol. TSG SA, no. Prague, Czech Republic; 20080602, Jun. 2, 2008, XP050211037 [retrieved on Jun. 2, 2008] Chapters 4.3.3, 6.3.1.1-4, 6.3.2.2.2, 6.3.2.3.1. |
3GPP: “3rd Generation Partnership Project;Technical Specification Group Services and Architecture;Feasibility Study on Multimedia Session Continuity; Stage 2(Release 8)” 3GPP Draft; 23893-200, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre ; 650, Route Des Lucioles ; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex ; France, vol. TSG SA, no. Prague, Czech Republic; 20080602, Jun. 2, 2008, XP05021170 [retrieved on Jun. 2, 2008] Chapter 6.4.1, 6.5.1.3, 6.5.2.4a,b. |
Handley UCL V Jacobs0n Packet Design C Perkins University of Glasgow M: “SDP: Session Description Protocol; draft-ietf-mmusic-r^seebis-OI.txt” SDP: Session Description Protocol; DRAFT-IETF-MMUSIC-RFC4566BIS-01.TXT, Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF. |
Handley UCL V Jacobs0n Packet Design C Perkins University of Glasgow M: “SDP: Session Description Protocol; draft-ietf-mmusic-r^seebis-OI.txt” SDP: Session Descripton Protocol; DRAFT-IETF-MMUSIC-RFC4566BIS-01.TXT, Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF; Standardworkingdraft, Internet Society (ISOC) 4, Rue Des Falaises CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland, vol. mmusic, No. 1, Jun. 8, 2008, XP015058552 paragraphs [04.1], [5.14]. |
Taiwan Search Report—TW098120668—TIPO—Aug. 29, 2012. |
Taiwan Search Report—TW098120668—TIPO—Jun. 24, 2013. |
Chen, M-X., et al., “Session mobility of SIP over multiple devices,” Tridentcom 2008, Innsbruck, Austria, Mar. 18-20, 2008, 9 pp. |
Oh Y. J. et al., “VoIP Service Technology Trends”, Journal of the Korean Society of Broadcasting Engineers, Sep. 2005, vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 84-93. |
3GPP “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and Architecture; IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) Service Continuity; Stage 2(Release 8)” 3GPP Draft; 23237-100, SRD Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France, vol. TSG SA, No. Prague, Czech Republic; Jun. 2, 2008, XP050211037 [retrieved on Jun. 2, 2008] Chapters 4.3.3, 6.3.1.1, 6.3.2.2.2, 6.3.2.3.1,. |
3GPP “3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Services and Architecture; Feasibility Study on Multimedia Session Continuity; Stage 2(Release 8)” 3GPP Draft; 23893-200, 3RD Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre; 650, Route des Lucioles; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex; France vol. TSG SA, No. Prague, Czech Republic; Jun. 2, 2008, XP050211170 [retrieved on Jun. 2, 2008] Chapter 6.4.1, 6.5.1.3, 6.5.2.4a, b. |
Handley UCL V Jacobson Packet Design C Perkins University of Glasgow M; “SDP: Session Description Protocol; draft-ietf-mmusic-r^seebis-Ol.txt” SDP: Session Description Protocol; Draft-IETF-Mmusic-RFC4566BIS-01, Txt, Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF:. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090319676 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61073902 | Jun 2008 | US |