This invention relates to a conveyor condition monitor, in particular, for a conveyor comprising a plurality of trollies, a monitor adapted to detect the presence of deformed trollies.
Conveyors are used widely in both industrial and commercial settings for the transport of various articles from one place to another. In essence a conveyor is a looped system with a surface or retaining means on or in which articles are positioned and transported. The surface or retaining means run continuously around a track, and may transport articles along all or only part of the length of the track. One example is the so-called monorail conveyor or I-beam conveyor system, which typically comprise a number of trollies joined together by a number of chain links. The trollies are mounted on a beam having an “I”-shaped cross-section by means of wheels that run along the central part of the beam and are retained by one of the perpendicular cross portions of the “I”. This forms the conveyor track, and may be in standard 3, 4, or 6 inch or corresponding metric track heights. Either the trollies form pendants hanging down from the conveyor track, and articles are transported along the conveyor by suspension from the trollies, or the chain engages with a carrier system mounted beneath the conveyor. The configuration is chosen based upon the weight of the articles being transported. For example, heavy objects will require their weight to be evenly distributed across a number of trollies, whereas lighter objects can be mounted on a single trolley.
In order for the conveyor system to work reliably and efficiently it is important that the trollies and chains are in good condition. Any form of deformation in a trolley, such as bent, stationary or missing wheels, bent arms, trollies that are loose and starting to come away from the chain, or trollies with any damaged, deformed or defective areas or components can potentially cause catastrophic damage to a conveyor and to articles being transported. In addition this can pose a health and safety risk to any personnel working in the vicinity of the conveyor, or for bystanders. Consequently, maintenance, additional inspection and repair can lead to unscheduled or increased downtime of the conveyor.
It has been appreciated that real time inspection of a conveyor can help prevent unscheduled or increased downtime by highlighting the presence of deformed trollies. One aspect of the invention provides a conveyor condition monitor, the conveyor comprising a plurality of trollies running along a conveyor rail and linked to one another by a chain link system, comprising: a conveyor monitoring station; and a first deformation sensor; wherein the deformation sensor is in communication with the conveyor monitor, and wherein the deformation sensor is adapted to notify the conveyor monitor of the presence of a deformed trolley in the conveyor.
As mentioned above, it has been appreciated that real-time monitoring of a conveyor system to highlight and identify deformed trollies can be used to reduce the duration and frequency of conveyor downtime associated with the presence of deformed trollies.
Deformed trollies include those that have bent, stationary or missing wheels, bent arms, trollies that are loose and starting to come away from the chain, or trollies with any damaged, deformed or defective areas or components. Such a conveyor system will typically comprise a plurality of trollies running along a conveyor rail and linked to one another by a chain link system. A conveyor condition monitor can comprise a conveyor monitoring station and a first deformation sensor. This deformation sensor is in communication with the conveyor monitor, is adapted to notify the conveyor monitor of the presence of a deformed trolley in the conveyor. This ensures that any deformed trollies are highlighted and, as in the example below, may be identified to enable a rapid repair of the conveyor system to take place, thus minimising downtime.
In order to indicate that a trolley is deformed the first 5a and second 5b deformation sensors are adapted to have a first state and a second state, the first state indicating that a trolley is not deformed and a second state indicating that a trolley is deformed. The first and second states must be clearly different and easily discernible to make the indication of the deformation as accurate as possible. The first 5a and the second 5b deformation sensors are arranged so as to be positionable symmetrically about the conveyor rail, such that the actual position of the deformation on the trolley is easily identifiable. The conveyor condition monitor 1 is positioned in the plane of the conveyor rail, and may be used regardless of the orientation of the conveyor rail to the ground—in other words the housing 3 may be any orientation with respect to the ground as long as the conveyor trollies pass through the gap 4.
The first 5a and second 5b deformation sensors may be chosen from optical sensors, mechanical sensors, magnetic sensors, harmonic sensors and ultrasonic sensors. Each type of sensor offers different advantages, and may be particularly useful in different environments.
As discussed above, deformed trollies include those that have bent, stationary or missing wheels, bent arms, trollies that are loose and starting to come away from the chain, or trollies with any damaged, deformed or defective areas or components. Only one arm 13a, 13b may be deformed, or both arms 13a. 13b may be deformed.
The amount by which a light beam 17a, 17b is interrupted can be used to estimate the amount of deformation of a trolley 12. If a light beam 17a, 17b is completely interrupted, this can indicate catastrophic deformation that requires the entire conveyor to be shut down immediately. Variations in the intensity of the reflected light detected by the optical detectors 7a, 7b may indicate levels of damage and/or action points in terms of inspection. A minimum acceptable reflectance may be chosen, below which the conveyor is stopped immediately, and above which the period before the next inspection is reduced. Other levels of reflectance may be used to determine maintenance schedules. A rapid change in reflectance may indicate a particular problem at some point on the conveyor, for example, a problem with the I-beam or surrounding infrastructure, and indicate that an inspection is necessary.
In the above example, an optical sensor arrangement with two light sources 6a, 6b, two/four optical detectors 7a, 7a′, 7b, 7b′ and two reflectors 8a, 8b are utilised. However, it may be desirable to use only a single light source and/or a single reflector and/or a single optical detector, depending on the type of conveyor or trolley being monitored. For example, a single light source may be used, along with a single optical detector, by employing either an arrangement of additional reflectors, lenses or beam splitters in the optical path of the light beam. Similarly, an arrangement of optical components may be used in conjunction with a single reflector or optical detector. Some types of optical sensor do not need to employ a reflector, for example, where the optical detector is arranged to detect the light beam directly. In the above arrangement this would lead to the optical detector being positioned on the housing 3 near the gap 4, and may be adjustable toward or away from the edges 4a, 4b of the gap 4. Any suitable light source, such as a laser, monochromatic or polychromatic (white) light bulb, may be used in place of the light emitting diodes illustrated above.
Regardless of the type of deformation sensor used, the conveyor monitoring station 2 is adapted to sound an alarm if the deformation sensor is in the second state. This may be an audio and/or visual alarm. The conveyor condition monitor 1 may further an identification device adapted to identify an individual trolley in the conveyor. This may be by way of recognising a visual identification, such as a number or other visual marker provided on each trolley, or recognising a non-visual identification, such as a passive RFID tag. The conveyor condition monitor 1 ideally also includes a marking device adapted to mark an individual trolley in the conveyor. Marking may consist of providing a physical marker, such as a blob of paint or ink, a label or other self-adhesive sticker, with a printing device being particularly suitable.
In one example, the conveyor condition monitor 1 also comprises a notification device adapted to send a notification indicating the presence of a deformed trolley in the conveyer. Such notification includes a unique identifier for the trolley; and the position of the trolley in the conveyor. The notification itself may be an email, an SMS message, an MMS message, a text message, an automated voice message or a system notification.
In the above examples, the conveyor on which the conveyor condition monitor 1 is adapted for use on a monorail conveyor. However, suitable modifications to the housing 3 would enable the conveyor condition monitor 1 to be used on other types of conveyor. Other adaptions, such as changes to individual sensor constructions (reflectors, detector and sources) fall within the five groups of sensors described above. In addition, the conveyor condition monitor 1 may be combined with other monitoring systems, either as a standalone system or a system connectable to a network for communication with a remote client, server, or cloud server. These and other features of the invention will be apparent from the appended claims.
This application is a National Phase application of, and claims the benefit of, International (PCT) Application No. PCT/IB2017/000917, filed Jun. 26, 2017, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/354,911, filed Jun. 27, 2016, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2017/000917 | 6/26/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/002708 | 1/4/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5490590 | Courtney | Feb 1996 | A |
5563392 | Brown et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5994712 | Mack | Nov 1999 | A |
6851546 | Lodge | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862939 | Frost | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6993978 | Frost | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7540374 | Rathbun et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
8127918 | Warner | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8285494 | Vozner | Oct 2012 | B2 |
10486910 | Kahrger | Nov 2019 | B2 |
20120186613 | Siegmund | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20200277143 | Bottini | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200346874 | Onishi | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 511 062 | Dec 2006 | CA |
2511062 | Dec 2006 | CA |
H10 300426 | Nov 1998 | JP |
2008 039708 | Feb 2008 | JP |
2008039708 | Feb 2008 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Anonymous: “Keeping watch Overhead for Conveyor Performance”, Oct. 8, 2012, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.forgingmagazine.com/handling/stopping-disruptions-overhead [retrieved on Nov. 27, 2017]. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190322462 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62354911 | Jun 2016 | US |