1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to a conveyor having an endless thermoplastic belt wrapped around a drive pulley and an idler.
2. Description of the Related Art
Endless thermoplastic conveyor belts are typically used in situations where hygiene and cleanliness are critically important. For example, in food processing plants such as those that process meat products for human consumption, endless thermoplastic belt conveyors are used to transport items. Sanitation is critically important and, therefore, the endless belts used in such conveyors are conventionally made of materials that can be hygienically cleaned.
Two types of endless thermoplastic belt conveyors are (1) conveyors with friction driven belts and (2) conveyors with low tension, direct drive belts. The former comprises an endless thermoplastic belt having smooth continuous surfaces on both sides of the belt and wrapped around at least a pair of smooth pulleys, such as a drive pulley and an idler. The belt is tensioned such that friction between the belt and the drive pulley induces movement of the belt. Thus, torque is transmitted to the belt through friction between the drive pulley surface and the adjacent surface of the belt. The effectiveness of this type of drive is a function of belt tension (both initial pretension and the tension generated due to the product load) and the coefficient of friction of the material of the belt surface and the material of the pulley surface. However, a friction driven flat belt is subject to contaminants that can affect the coefficient of friction. Moreover, elongated belts typically stretch over time and under load; such stretching can affect its tension, which affects the operation of the conveyor. When the belt stretches, the increased length of the belt tends to accumulate on the return side of the belt, thereby reducing the tension on the return side and affecting the friction between the belt and the drive pulley as well as between the belt and the idler. Prior art solutions to solving this problem are to pretension the belt before each use, which shortens the life of the belt, and to continually adjust the belt tension for varying loads, which is complex and can create tracking problems.
The second type of conveyor with the low tension, direct drive belt comprises an endless thermoplastic belt with a smooth continuous surface on one side and teeth on the other side adapted to engage grooves or sheaves in a drive sprocket. In an ideal toothed belt, torque is transmitted to the belt through the contact of a face of a groove or sheave on the drive sprocket to a face of a tooth on the belt. But the use of a thermoplastic toothed belt as a direct drive belt with a sprocket introduces problems, primarily because of the elasticity of the belt.
Because a thermoplastic belt stretches under load, the belt teeth may not always mate with the sprocket sheaves as the belt wraps around the sprocket. Prior solutions have determined that the tooth pitch of the belt must be less than the pitch of the drive sprocket at less than maximum elongation of the belt. Also, the sprocket pitch must equal the pitch of the belt at maximum elongation, give or take a fraction of a percent. Moreover, to ensure that the belt teeth are positioned to enter the sprocket sheaves, the width of each sheave in the sprocket must exceed the belt tooth width at least by the amount of distance generated by elongating the belt the maximum allowable amount over the span of the belt wrap.
Yet problems remain in ensuring that the belt teeth stay engaged with the sprocket sheaves over the full range of belt elongation and load in the field. Due to the necessary pitch difference between the belt and the sprocket, only one belt tooth will be driven by a sprocket sheave at any given moment. It has been found that this engaged tooth is always the tooth that is about to exit the sprocket. For all subsequent belt teeth that engage the sprocket sheaves at any given moment, there is a gap between the face of the belt tooth and the face of the sprocket sheave, and that gap progressively increases in size for each successive tooth. The size of these gaps are a function of belt tension, in that each respective gap is largest when the belt has minimum tension and smallest when the belt is at maximum tension. If the belt tension exceeds a predetermined maximum, the entry tooth will no longer sit properly in the sprocket sheave and effective drive characteristics will be lost. In other words, the sprocket may rotate while the belt slips until a tooth engages again.
It can be seen that as the exiting tooth disengages from the drive sprocket there remains some amount of gap between the following belt tooth and the face of its respective sprocket sheave. Therefore, discounting any momentum of the belt and any friction between the belt and the sprocket, the belt will effectively stop for a brief moment until the following sheave re-engages the new “exit tooth.” For this brief moment, no torque is transmitted from the sprocket to the belt, and, thus, the belt speed is temporally retarded.
This motion causes a slight amount of vibration and noise in the system. Vibration increases in frequency as sprocket tooth pitch is reduced and/or sprocket rotation speed is increased. It may be nearly undetectable in belt applications with a small tooth pitch and a large amount of mass for damping, such as when large product loads approach a predetermined maximum for belt elongation. But for many applications, particularly where loads are light and/or belt speed is slower, the resultant vibration and noise may be unacceptable.
Nevertheless, some slip between the belt and the sprocket is what enables a direct drive application to work. This temporary disengagement of belt teeth from sprocket sheaves causes the average belt speed to be less than the average sprocket speed. In fact, the average belt speed is less than the sprocket speed by the percentage of elongation that is still available in the belt (max elongation−current elongation). Because of this necessary slip, any characteristics of a flat belt drive will compromise the benefits of direct drive, e.g. friction. Friction between the belt and the sprocket will retard slippage and may cause the trailing tooth to miss the sprocket sheave altogether.
Another problem occurs when the belt is under virtually no tension. In some applications, such as a horizontally positioned conveyor, the weight of the lower span of the belt tends to pull the teeth at the exit point out of the respective sprocket sheave. The critical area of belt wrap around the sprocket is the short distance between the exit point and one sprocket sheave pitch back. If the belt tooth remains engaged through this arc then proper drive will be achieved, but if not, belt teeth will “pop” and the driving dynamics will become uncontrolled. Additionally, when the belt is under virtually no tension, keeping the belt teeth engaged with the sheaves of the idler pulley can become problematic.
Thus, both types of the endless thermoplastic belt conveyors—those with friction driven belts and low tension, direct drive belts—can suffer from problems related to keeping the belt engaged on the idler due to excess length on the return side of the belt. If the belt is long enough and heavy enough to form a catenary curve on the return side, the weight of the belt may be sufficient to provide the requisite tension. However, the belt is not always sufficiently heavy, and the conditions of the conveyor, including the varying sizes of loads, are not always suitable for relying on formation of a natural catenary curve.
The invention solves the aforementioned problems by providing a conveyor comprising a drive pulley; an idler spaced from the drive pulley; an endless thermoplastic belt wrapped around the drive pulley and the idler and driven by the drive pulley for movement about the drive pulley and the idler, the endless thermoplastic belt having a load-carrying span adapted to move from the idler to the drive pulley and a return span adapted to move from the drive pulley to the idler; and a roller on the return span near the idler whereby the weight of the roller acting on the return span tends to keep the endless thermoplastic belt engaged with the idler.
The endless thermoplastic belt has a width, and the roller can have a weight corresponding to less than one pound per inch of the width of the endless thermoplastic belt.
The endless thermoplastic belt can comprise a plurality of teeth, and the drive pulley can comprise a plurality of sheaves configured to engage the teeth for moving the endless thermoplastic belt. The idler can comprise a pulley having a plurality of sheaves. The roller and the teeth of the endless thermoplastic belt can have complementary shapes. For example, each of the teeth can comprise multiple spaced teeth portions, and the roller can comprise projections sized for receipt in the spaces between the teeth portions to form the complementary shapes.
The endless thermoplastic belt can have a smooth inner surface, and the roller can be smooth to complement the smooth inner surface of the endless thermoplastic belt. The endless thermoplastic belt can comprise a plurality of holes that at least partially extend through the endless thermoplastic belt, and the drive pulley can have a plurality of teeth configured to engage the holes for moving the endless thermoplastic belt. The idler can comprise a pulley having a plurality of teeth.
The endless thermoplastic belt can extend between a pair of side edges, and the roller can extend from one of the side edges of the endless thermoplastic belt to the other side edge of the endless thermoplastic belt.
The conveyor can further comprise a slide that supports the roller on the return span and can be configured to allow movement of the roller toward and away from the return span. The slide can be further configured to prevent movement of the roller in the direction of movement of the return span. In one embodiment, the slide can be configured to allow vertical movement of the roller and prevent horizontal movement of the roller.
The return span can have a center located about midway between the drive pulley and the idler, and the roller can be positioned closer to the idler than to the center of the return span.
In the drawings:
Some problems with known thermoplastic direct drive belts are shown in
The belt 100 has a pitch 112 defined as the distance between the centerlines of adjacent teeth 106. The belt pitch 112 is measured along a belt pitch line 114, which corresponds to the neutral bending axis of the belt. As the belt 100 bends around the sprocket 102, the neutral bending axis is that imaginary plane on one side of which the belt material is under compression and on the other side of which the belt material is under tension.
Similarly, the sprocket pitch 116 is the arc length between the centerlines of adjacent sheaves 104, measured along the sprocket's pitch circle 118. The sprocket pitch circle 118 in this case corresponds to the belt pitch line 114 as the belt 100 wraps around the sprocket 102. In other words, the sprocket pitch circle 118 will have the same radius as the belt pitch line 114 as the belt wraps around the sprocket.
As noted above, the exit tooth 120 will be the drive tooth as its driving surface 109 contacts the driving surface 105 of the sheave 104 that has received the exit tooth. The trailing tooth 122 nests in its corresponding sheave 104, but there is a gap 124 between the tooth driving surface 109 and the sheave driving surface 105.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the sprocket and belt are designed to permit minimal friction between them. The toothed surface of the belt can be coated with a friction reducing material, e.g. PTFE. The sprocket will preferably have minimal surfaces contacting the belt anywhere but on the belt tooth surfaces. For example, the supporting structure between adjacent sheaves can be recessed from the perimeter of the sprocket. It can also have a narrower neck to reduce surface contact with the belt (See
In another aspect of the invention, a position limiter 200 is disposed near where the exit tooth 120 of the belt leaves the corresponding sheave of the sprocket, as shown in
The position limiter 200 can be a belt-width roller, as shown, or it can be multiple rollers, such as a pair with one on each edge of the belt. Alternatively the position limiter can be one or more arms or points bearing against the belt, preferably with friction reducing wear pads. Further, the position limiter can be a scraper bar bearing against the belt that will serve two functions, to wit: maintaining the exit tooth within the sheave of the sprocket and cleaning the belt as it exits the sprocket. The position limiter 200 need not extend across the belt. It need only be positioned to maintain the belt against the sprocket or sprockets until the driven tooth is timely released from the respective sheave.
An alternative embodiment of a direct drive thermoplastic belt system, according to one embodiment of the invention, is shown in
A center drive such as this solves the problems associated with any “flat belt drive” component of the system, such as might be caused by friction between the belt an the sprocket for example. As explained above, friction can cause the belt entry tooth to advance relative to the pulley tooth and thus “skip”. This might occur, for example, when the friction force between the belt and the sprocket generates a higher speed component than the driving force of the tooth drive surface against the sprocket drive surface. Minimizing the amount of wrap also tends to reduce the opportunity for friction between the belt and the sprocket.
It has been found that if any of the sprockets are not drive sprockets, the speed of the idler sprocket can cause problems. The drive sprocket is generally traveling at a greater speed than the belt speed. If the same geometry was used for the idler sprocket as the drive sprocket then, for proper tooth engagement, the idler sprocket would have to travel at the same speed as the drive sprocket. But the idler sprocket cannot travel any faster than the belt, inasmuch as the belt drives the idler sprocket. Therefore the idler sprocket must have a different pitch than the drive sprocket (different geometry). Preferably, the idler sprocket pitch will be less than or equal to the pitch of an un-tensioned belt. Consequently, as the belt pitch changes with elongation, the idler sprocket will be compelled to go slower than the belt. Just as in the drive sprocket, the width of the sheaves must exceed the belt tooth width such that there is enough gap to allow for the added length of belt that will occur at the maximum belt tension over the span of belt wrap.
The idler sprocket will primarily be driven as by a flat belt because of its low drag characteristics. This will cause the entry tooth on an elongated belt to not ideally engage a sheave on the idler sprocket. To overcome this problem, the coefficient of friction must be minimized as explained earlier. In addition, the angle of the tooth contact face can be designed such that at maximum elongation of the belt, the tip of the belt tooth will contact the sprocket sheave driving surface at some point. This will allow the belt tooth to slowly engage the sprocket sheave while slowing the idler sprocket down until the proper engagement is made. An example is shown in
Another option for an idler sprocket is to use a stationary disk that the belt simply slides against. While this increases friction between the belt and the idler, it is of no consequence since there is no toothed drive between the belt and the idler. To accommodate these disks longitudinal grooves are provided through the teeth on the bottom of the belt at set increments to enable the belt to move smoothly over the stationary drive sprockets. Using these disks eliminates the complications of idler sprocket geometry as well as functioning as effective tracking devices. Further, by being stationary the belt will not have a tendency to “climb up” these disks as it would if the smooth sprockets were rotating.
Another alternative embodiment of a direct drive endless thermoplastic belt conveyor 400, according to one embodiment of the invention, is shown in
In this configuration, the belt 402 travels in the direction of arrow 420 as the drive pulley 404 rotates in the direction of the arrow 420. A portion of the belt 402 that moves from the idler pulley 406 to the drive pulley 404 is an upper or load-carrying span 422, and a portion of the belt 402 that moves from the drive pulley 404 to the idler pulley 406 is a lower or return span 424. In the configuration illustrated in
According to one embodiment of the invention, the conveyor 400 further comprises a roller 430, which can be freely rotatable, located on the return span 424. The roller 430 can be located near the idler pulley 406, which corresponds to a position closer to the idler pulley 406 than the drive pulley 404. In other words, the return span 424 has a center 426 located about midway between the drive pulley 404 and the idler pulley 406, and the roller 430 is located between the center 426 and the idler pulley 406. According to one embodiment, the roller 430 can be positioned closer to the idler pulley 406 than the center 426.
The conveyor 400 comprises a slide 432 that supports the roller 430 on the return span 424. An exemplary slide can be viewed in
The roller 430 can have any suitable form, including a cylindrical roller as shown in
The roller 430 has a weight suitable to act on the return span 424 to add enough tension to the return span 424 to keep the belt 402 engaged with the idler pulley 406. At the same time, the weight of the roller 430 does not add significant amounts of tension to the overall belt 402 that would have adverse effects on the drive characteristics of the belt 402. According to one embodiment, the roller 430 is lightweight. For example, the roller 430 can have a weight less than about one pound per inch of the width of the belt 402. By adjusting the weight of the roller 430, the amount of tension on the return span 424 can be controlled to keep the belt 402 engaged with the idler pulley 406. Alternatively, the roller 430 can be biased to exert a force on the return span 424 comparable to a weighted roller. In such case, the bias can be controlled in order to adjust the force applied to the return span. Biasing can be accomplished by a fixed spring, or by an adjustable spring such as a gas spring.
In addition to the weight of the roller 430, the position of the roller 430 relative to the drive pulley 404 and the idler pulley 406 also affects the behavior of the return span 424. As the position of the roller 430 moves farther from the idler pulley 406 and closer to the center 426, the amount of wrap around the drive pulley 404 decreases (i.e., the belt 402 leaves the drive pulley 404 earlier). By placing the roller 430 near the idler pulley 406, the roller 430 adds sufficient tension to the return span 424 to keep the belt 402 engaged with the idler pulley 406, yet the added tension does not pull the belt 402 away from the drive pulley 404 enough to contribute to significant premature exit of the belt 402 from the drive pulley 404.
The use of a roller to keep the belt engaged with the idler pulley is also applicable to a low tension, direct drive conveyor having pins on the pulleys and complementary holes in the belt, wherein the holes extend at least partially through the belt, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application No. 60/743,190, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In this case, the roller can have a smooth surface because the belt inside surface is smooth, i.e., it lacks any teeth or other projections that would abut the roller as the belt moves relative to the roller.
While the invention has been specifically described in connection with certain specific embodiments thereof, it is to be understood that this is by way of illustration and not of limitation, and the scope of the appended claims should be construed as broadly as the prior art will permit.
This application claims the benefit of the International Application filed Jan. 19, 2006, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/593,493, filed Jan. 19, 2005.