The present invention relates generally to stoves and cooking apparatus for use in confined areas.
In many parts of the world, heating and cooking are performed using combustible biomaterial as a fuel source. Combustion with this type of fuel often is incomplete leading to production of poisonous gases, especially carbon monoxide. Within a living or enclosed space, use of biomaterials carbon monoxide may build-up causing sickness or death.
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless, tasteless toxic gas produced by incomplete combustion in fuel-burning. CO poisoning may result in headaches, nausea, dizziness, or confusion. Left undetected, CO exposure can be fatal, and in the United States alone, accidental CO poisoning results in about 15,000 ER visits a year.
Because carbon monoxide is a byproduct of incomplete combustion, procedures that enhance combustion will reduce the production of carbon monoxide. Those of skill in the art will understand that enhancing combustion may generally be accomplished in three ways—by increasing the duration of combustion, raising the temperature at which combustion takes place, or optimizing the mixing of oxygen and fuel. Another contributor to incomplete combustion may be the presence of a heat sink that may quench combustion. In general, it is easier to control these factors when a gaseous fuel is burned as opposed to a solid fuel. Thus, in developed countries, solid fuel has been largely replaced by gaseous fuels for household use. But, as is evident from the carbon monoxide poisoning statistics presented above, even in the United States, improperly maintained natural gas or propane burners may produce significant amounts of carbon monoxide.
Carbon monoxide may be produced by combustion even under controlled conditions using modern appliances. For this reason, modern must be carefully engineered to properly mix air with gas and modern appliances are generally vented to allow exhaust to be directed out of the house. In contrast, in other countries, it is not uncommon for households to employ unvented, solid fuel biomass stoves for heating and cooking. Use of biomass creates a significant risk if the stove is used within the living quarters or an enclosed space.
Outside the United States, the predominant combustible material for household energy production come from solid fuels such as biomaterial (for example, without wishing to be limited, pelletized or compressed waste or wood, wood chips, coal, dung or other organic materials such as twigs, grasses, or rice husks). For example, it is estimated that over 70% of African households and 80% of Chinese households burn solid fuels for domestic energy needs. As described above, when solid fuel, especially wood, is burned in confined or poorly ventilated spaces, carbon monoxide levels may build to dangerous levels. It has been estimated that between 1.5 and 2 million people die each year as a result of exposure to indoor air pollution resulting from the use of solid fuels.
Poverty is one of the largest contributing factors to the use of solid biomaterial as a fuel source. For example, studies have shown that per capita gross national product (GNP) is closely correlated with dependence on biomass: countries with lower per capita GNP tend to rely on traditional fuel sources far more than countries with higher GNP. Thus, any solution to the problem of indoor air pollution from the combustion of solid fuels must be both cost effective and must not dramatically impact traditional behavior.
Various stove designs are available that may lessen the risk of using biomass for heating or cooking indoors. These stoves attempt to increase stove efficiency, and thus decrease pollution. Some stoves may be constructed of traditional materials such as brick, stone, or ceramics. Other stoves may be constructed of metal. Some stoves are designed to be constructed with either traditional or modern materials, such as, for example without limitation, “rocket” stoves. Rocket stoves employ an “L” design to control the combustion of fuel and mixing of air. In many rocket stoves, fuel, for example twigs, is slowly introduced to the combustion chamber at the bottom of the L. This slow addition of fuel helps to limit the rate of combustion by confining burning to the tips of the sticks. Rocket stove design may include insulation of the chimney to decrease quenching of combustion by cooler surfaces. Some stoves may be designed with a constant radius for both the upper and lower combustion chamber. While rocket stoves may be designed to control air flow passively, other stove designs use electric fans to force air through.
Gasification stove design may rely on passive air flow but more often employs forced air from electric fans to increase stove efficiency. Gasification stoves, (variously known as fan-stoves, semi-gasification stoves, etc.) offer an alternative to traditional stove designs. Gasification stoves replace direct combustion of biomass fuel with techniques that release volatile gases, which are then ignited separately. Gasification is a process that converts carbon containing materials, such as, for example without limitation, coal, petroleum, biomaterial, or biomass, into carbon monoxide and hydrogen by reacting the raw material at high temperatures with a controlled amount of oxygen and/or steam. The resulting gas mixture is itself a fuel and can be combusted. This process may reduce pollution by reducing incomplete combustion and the amount of material needed to fuel the stove.
Gasification techniques are potentially more efficient than direct combustion of the original fuel because it can be combusted at higher temperatures. In addition, the high-temperature combustion may refine out more corrosive elements such as chloride and potassium, allowing relatively cleaner combustion in some cases as well as higher efficiency. However, gasification stoves may be more difficult to construct than some other types of stoves, and therefore more expensive to produce.
To reduce costs of a solid fuel stove for household use and make it accessible to low income persons, requires that the materials used in its construction be inexpensive and that the manufacturing process be efficient and low cost. This is difficult because the combustion environment associated with the use of solid fuels is extreme, both in temperature and corrosiveness. Among other compounds, combustion of biomass produces highly corrosive nitrogen and sulfur compounds.
The combustion environment found in biomass stoves is unsuitable for most low-cost metals, therefore many stoves are constructed of ceramics, brick, or rock. The use of ceramic, brick, and rock, while reducing the cost of manufacture, may dramatically increase the cost of producing and distributing these stoves, decrease their durability, portability, limit combustion chamber geometry and may otherwise be undesirable.
Thus what is needed is a stove that is acceptable and accessible to persons with limited income, such as a stove that lessens the amount of toxic emissions, and may be produced from lightweight, inexpensive, corrosion-resistant materials, and that may be inexpensively and efficiently manufactured.
Many manufactured stoves, designed for use with solid fuels, are not specifically designed to lessen production of dangerous combustion products. Those manufactured stoves that do address indoor pollution are generally not ideal, either because they rely on drastic changes in traditional behavior (such as limiting use of solid fuels, moving the stoves out of doors, or depending on expensive or impractical venting), or they are financially out of reach for those with modest incomes. A cooking/heating alternative that is compatible with traditional behavior, inexpensive, and capable of lessening production of dangerous gases, may help prevent death and disease especially among persons of limited income.
A stove design is provided that reduces the amount of, at least, carbon monoxide gas emitted from burning a solid fuel energy source, especially biomass. The stove design may be used in either heating or cooking stoves. The inventive design comprises a combustion chamber with two parts, a first, lower combustion chamber and a second, upper combustion chamber. The lower combustion chamber may be configured to receive a solid biomass fuel. The upper combustion chamber may contain an annular constriction positioned within the second, generally cylindrical, upper combustion chamber. The constriction is designed to aid in completely combusting combustion gases as they travel through the upper combustion chamber by slowing the exit of incompletely combusted gases, re-directing uncombusted gases toward the center of the upper combustion chamber and into a flame, and by creating a hot surface that promotes combustion. In various embodiments, the constriction may comprise an orifice ring.
In many embodiments, the inventive design of the lower combustion chamber is a variety of shapes such as cylindrical, or pie shaped depending on the type of fuel used and the stove's intended purpose. A fuel grate or grill may be positioned within the lower combustion chamber to receive solid fuel. Solid fuel may be positioned, ignited, and partially or fully consumed within the lower combustion chamber. Flames and gases may be further consumed within the upper part and the resulting heat and exhaust gases directed out of the upper combustion chamber and toward a cooking vessel.
In various embodiments, constricting the flow of flames and gasses in the upper combustion chamber with an orifice ring, redirects partially combusted or uncombusted gases, such as for example, carbon monoxide, away from the wall of the upper part of the combustion chamber, back toward the center and into the flame where it may be consumed. The orifice ring may also create turbulence above the ring, so that gases near the wall of the upper combustion chamber remain in the upper combustion chamber longer, increasing the likelihood that they may be consumed before exiting the combustion chamber. The orifice ring may be positioned throughout the upper combustion chamber and more than one orifice ring may be positioned within the upper combustion chamber. In constricting the exhaust flow, redirecting it into the flame, and delaying its exit from the upper part of the combustion chamber, the orifice helps to reduce the amount of incompletely combusted gases produced. Thus, the inventive structure may help reduce the amount of at least carbon monoxide produced during heating or cooking by enhancing combustion of uncombusted, partially combusted, and dangerous gases within the upper part of the combustion chamber, reducing fuel use, and increasing energy efficiency
As described here, placement of the constriction or orifice ring within the upper combustion chamber helps to redirect and retard incompletely combusted gases, so that they might complete combustion before exiting the upper part of the combustion chamber. Solid fuel, especially biomaterial, is placed in the lower part combustion chamber and ignited. As the fuel burns, exhaust (comprising combustion gases, entrained air, particulate matter, as well as incompletely combusted gases) is formed and enters the upper part of the combustion chamber. The exhaust at the center of the second part continues to undergo combustion as it traverses the upper part of the combustion chamber, but combustion may be quenched near the walls of the upper combustion chamber leading to buildup of incompletely and uncombusted gases. However, these gases may be redirected into the hotter center of the upper part of the combustion chamber, or the flame, by the orifice ring and therefore may complete combustion.
Incompletely combusted gases that get by the orifice plate without being consumed have another chance to undergo combustion as their progress through the upper combustion chamber is retarded by the turbulence and/or recirculation produced above the constriction or orifice ring. To further reduce quenching by the upper part of the combustion chamber, the presently disclosed combustion chamber may be insulated by addition of various materials. For example without limitation, in some embodiments the insulating material may be stone, dirt, sand, clay, quarried materials, or a mixture thereof. In some embodiments, the quarried material may be, for example without limitation, perlite or vermiculite.
As the exhaust exits the upper combustion chamber it may be used to heat a cooking vessel placed atop a stove cooktop which may be in communication with the combustion chamber outlet. Because many households throughout the world use solid fuel in cooking and heating, even in confined spaces, the inventive device will help to lower, at least, levels of carbon monoxide and thus lessen the chances of death and disease resulting from carbon monoxide poisoning.
One of the many applications of the inventive structure is as part of an inexpensive, portable stove. When used in such a stove application the inventive structure may help reduce carbon monoxide production by as much as 60%.
In accordance with another embodiment a multi-burner cooktop is provided. The inventive stove may include a cooktop that sits atop the stove and directs exhaust from the combustion chamber to more than one opening such that multiple cooking vessels may be warmed at once. This inventive cooktop is designed to partially fit into the combustion chamber outlet and redirect heated exhaust through an exhaust chamber in communication with the two openings at the cooktop. The inventive cooktop may also have a third opening designed to allow exhaust gases to exit the exhaust chamber. In some embodiments, the third opening may be designed with a collar to receive an exhaust stovepipe or vent.
In accordance with another embodiment, a metal alloy for use in the manufacture of a corrosion resistant combustion chamber for a stove is provided. The inventive combustion chamber lessens the cost of producing the stove and increases its durability in the extreme conditions found in biomass fuel consumption. The corrosion-resistant alloy is low cost compared to other corrosion resistant metals. Further, unlike corrosion resistant ceramic materials, the alloy reduces the weight of a stove manufactured with the alloy and therefore the cost of producing and shipping the stove. The alloy can be used in a wide range of heating and cooking stoves. For example, without limitation, the alloy may be used to produce rocket stoves, fan stoves, gasification stoves, coal stoves, and charcoal stoves.
in various embodiments, the metal alloy, includes iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), aluminum (Al). The alloy may be referred to as FeCrAl, and may also include other elements such as carbon and titanium. While FeCrAl is well known in the art as a metal alloy for use generally in non-structural applications such as wires or heating elements. FeCrAl has not been used in the construction of stoves, because it dramatically loses tensile strength at elevated temperatures. Rather, FeCrAl is often chosen for applications based on its superior electrical resistivity. Other characteristics of FeCrAl, such as for example, weldability, may be similar to other iron containing metals.
In the presently disclosed stove, FeCrAl is used to clad, line, or form the combustion chamber. However, FeCrAl may be used to clad, line, or form the combustion chamber of other types of stoves including, without limitation, rocket stoves, fan stoves, gasification stoves, semi-gasification stoves, coal stoves, and charcoal stoves.
The internal liner 400 may further define a combustion chamber 500, with openings at the mouth 220 and the surface 320 of the cooktop 300. Positioned within the combustion chamber 500, and visible through the mouth 220, may be a grate 570. The grate 570 may sit atop a slab 540, which is positioned within the combustion chamber 500 and also visible through the mouth 220.
The combustion chamber 500 may further define a lower combustion chamber 550 and an upper combustion chamber 560. The lower combustion chamber 550 may include a floor 535, a ceiling 525, and a sidewall 530. The sidewall 530, floor 535 and ceiling 525 may define the mouth 220 opening in the shell 210. The sidewall 530 may be comprised of a single piece and have a generally pie-shape. In the embodiment shown in
The grate 570 may be placed within the lower combustion chamber 550 and be supported by the slab 540. The grate 570 may be used to support solid fuel and may be constructed of, for example without limitation, mild steel. Solid fuel may include for example without limitation, coal, wood, charcoal, dung, leaves, grasses, pellets, wood chips, compressed or uncompressed biowaste, or other biomass material. A second, exterior grate 575, shown in
The second, upper combustion chamber 560 may be positioned generally above the lower combustion chamber 550. The lower combustion chamber 550 and the upper combustion chamber 560 are in communication at a boundary 555. The upper combustion chamber 560 may be generally cylindrical. The upper combustion chamber 560 may be in communication with the cooktop 300 at the combustion chamber outlet 520. In some embodiments, both the upper and lower combustion chamber may be generally cylindrical. In other embodiments as depicted in
As described in more detail below, alternative embodiments of the stove may lack a mouth, and the upper and lower combustion chambers may both be generally cylindrical. In these alternative embodiments, the boundary between the upper and lower combustion chambers may lack obvious delineation.
The presently disclosed combustion chamber 500 may be constructed of several sections, parts, or pieces. As depicted in
Also depicted in
In the present embodiment, as shown in
Various embodiments may include multiple constrictions 600, orifice rings 650, or combinations thereof positioned within the upper combustion chamber 560. In some embodiments the multiple constrictions 600 and/or orifice rings 650 may define the same do, in other embodiments the dos may be different. In still further embodiments the orifice rings may be arranged to define converging or diverging nozzles. In still further embodiments it may be possible to alter the do or the size of constrictions 600 or orifice rings 650 to affect damping or control vortex formation.
In various embodiments with multiple constrictions 600, the multiple constrictions 600 may define multiple constriction diameters, dc. In further embodiments with multiple constrictions 600, constrictions 600 and orifice rings 650 maybe combined. In some embodiments the upper combustion chamber may be other than cylindrical, for example, without limitation, the upper combustion chamber may be square.
In various embodiments of the orifice ring 650, the ring or plate may be removable or replaceable within the upper combustion chamber 560. Replacement of orifice rings 650 may be aided by use of, for example without limitation, snap-fittings, press-fittings, and friction fittings.
Experiments have shown that an orifice ring positioned within the upper combustion chamber will reduce CO by a significant amount, such as by 25% in some instances, and by 70% in other instances. Depending on the design of the combustion chamber and the fuel used, the results may vary.
The orifice ring 650 may be designed to slow heat transfer from the inner edge of the orifice ring 650 to the outer edge 670 of the orifice ring 650. In various embodiments of the orifice ring 650, as shown in
In some applications, as explained above, the upper combustion chamber 560 may act as a heat sink and act to at least partially quench combustion of gases near the interior wall of the combustion chamber 500. The orifice plate 650 may aid in helping redirect these gases back into the flame (arrows marked “C”), increasing the chance that they will undergo combustion. The inner edge 660 of the orifice ring 650 may be designed to become very hot to aid in promoting combustion of uncombusted gases flowing thereby. In addition, the orifice ring 650 creates a disruption in the flow of gases above the ring, such as by creating a turbulence zone (see arrows marked “D” in
As depicted in
The cooktop surface 750 may define three openings, which may be in communication with an exhaust chamber 760 defined by the underside of the cooktop surface 750 and the liner 765. A first opening 770 may be positioned near the rounded end 710. A second opening 780 may be positioned near the middle of the dual burner cooktop 700, and a third opening 790 may be positioned near to the elongated end 720. The first 770 and second 780 openings may be surrounded by annular ridges 775 designed to support a cooking vessel. The third opening 790 may define a collar 795. The third opening 790 is smaller than the first 770 and second opening 780, and acts as an exhaust outlet. The collar 795 of third opening 790 radiates upward from the cooktop surface 750 and may be designed to receive a stovepipe or vent (not shown). The annular ridges 775 of the first 770 and second opening 790 extend upward from the cooktop surface 750 and are generally concentric to the openings.
Arrows in
FECRAL
In various embodiments of the stove, the combustion chamber may be clad in FeCrAl. FeCrAl is a metal alloy containing iron, chromium, aluminum, and other elements in varying ratios depending on the intended purpose. FeCrAl is known in the art to be resistant to corrosion in both reductive and oxidative environments. FeCrAl may form two oxide layers, one iron and another of aluminum that help guard against corrosion. Normally used for its electrical resistivity characteristics, FeCrAl is typically not used for applications with high temperatures where structural load is applied because of its poor structural performance at high temperatures. For example, FeCrAl alloys may have a very high melting point (>1000° C.) and easily forms stable aluminum oxides which resist corrosion. When used as part of the combustion chamber of the present invention, FeCrAl performs well.
The present embodiment uses FeCrAl to form, line, or clad the combustion chamber as well as to form the orifice ring (if present). In at least one embodiment, the wall thickness of the combustion chamber may be 0.7 mm. Further embodiments may possess combustion chamber wall thicknesses greater than 0.7 mm or less than 0.7 mm, such as without limitation, 0.5 mm. In some embodiments the wall thickness of the upper portion of combustion chamber may be from 0.5 to 0.3 mm. In further embodiments the wall thickness of the upper combustion chamber may be less than 0.3 mm. In various embodiments the thickness of walls in the upper chamber may differ from the wall thickness in the lower chamber. In some embodiments, the thickness of the combustion chamber walls may vary. Use of this inexpensive, corrosion-resistant metal alloy allows production of an inexpensive, long-lasting, corrosion-resistant alternative to ceramics or specialized metals. Use of FeCrAl alloy may allow the construction of an inexpensive metal combustion chamber for biomass stoves as opposed to a combustion chamber of other metals or ceramics which are heavier and more problematic when manufacturing and shipping stoves. The reduced mass may also allow for faster heating of the chamber, reducing emissions and improving efficiency.
The ratio of compounds within the alloy may be changed depending on the desired application. For example, one FeCrAl alloy embodiment may contain a mixture of Al (˜5-15%), Cr (˜3-8%), and Fe (balance). Another embodiment may have a weight percent ratio of 13% Chromium:4% Aluminum, with the balance being mostly Iron. Other ranges include Al (2%-8%): Cr (10%-20%): Other (<1%): and Fe (Balance). In other embodiments the ratios of chromium, aluminum, iron, and other elements may vary.
In various embodiments, the FeCrAl may contain carbon, titanium, or zinc. In some embodiments, the FeCrAl may contain less than 0.1% carbon. In embodiments where FeCrAl contains less than 0.1% carbon, the FeCrAl may further comprise titanium. In embodiments with FeCrAl containing carbon and titanium, the titanium may be less than 1%. In some embodiments, the FeCrAl may contain about 0.08% or less of carbon and about 0.5% titanium. In various embodiments, titanium may help increase the oxidation resistance of FeCrAl containing carbon. FeCrAl may have the trade name FECRALLOY, OHMALOY (manufactured by Allegheny Ludlum), or KANTHAL. In the present embodiment, the orifice ring may also be constructed of FeCrAl. In other embodiments, the orifice ring may be constructed of other suitable materials.
Positioned at the base 1120 of the stove 1000 may be a plurality of apertures 1140 in the shell 1100. The apertures 1140 may open into an intake chamber 1410 defined by the bottom of the shell 1100 and a divider 1420, which divides the cavity 1400. The divider 1420 may define an opening 1430 into which may be placed a fan 1440. The fan 1440 may be connected to a wire(s) 1445, which are in turn connected to a battery 1450 or other device to provide electricity to the fan 1440. The fan 1440 may aid in drawing air through the apertures 1140 into the intake chamber 1410. The fan 1440 may further force air from the intake chamber 1410 into the cavity 1400 above the divider 1420. The battery 1450 may also be connected by wire(s) 1445 to a heating element 1330. The heating element 1330 may aid in heating solid biomass fuel 1001. The heated solid biomass fuel 1001 may give off volatile gases that mix with air that may be forced or drawn in from the cavity 1400 that may enter the combustion chamber 1320 through a plurality of inlets 1340 positioned near the floor 1335 of the lower combustion chamber 1350. Air from the cavity 1400 may also enter the combustion chamber 1320 through a second plurality of inlets 1345 positioned near the top of the upper combustion chamber 1360. In some embodiments a plurality of doors (not shown) may be movably and selectively positioned over the apertures and/or inlets to reduce the area of these openings and aid in regulation of the amount of air entering the combustion chamber.
When the stove in
In the embodiment shown in
Thermal efficiency and particulate matter production was analyzed in cookstoves with and without an orifice ring. In this experiment the amount of time needed to boil water was measured along with the amount of wood used and particulate matter produced for each stove. Results from the tests were used to calculate thermal efficiency for biomass stoves with and without an orifice ring.
Table 1 shows experimental results of stove performance with and without an orifice during a three phase modified water boil test. Wood was used as a bio-mass source. Carbon monoxide (CO) emissions are measured in grams, particulate matter (PM) is measured in milligrams, wood use in grams. The results presented in Table 1 show that the presence of an orifice ring led to decreased CO and PM production from the stove while increasing thermal efficiency.
The effect on carbon monoxide (CO) production of stoves with and without an orifice ring was tested using the Testo system. This experiment used a FeCrAl 100 mm standard rocket stove having an elbow. From a cold start, the tests showed that the orifice plate resulted in a 2.51 g of CO produced while the rocket elbow without the orifice plate resulted in production of 8.5 g of CO. CO production was measured by Fourier transform infrared (FITR) spectroscopy.
All directional references (e.g., upper, lower, upward, downward, left, right, leftward, rightward, top, bottom, above, below, inner, outer, vertical, horizontal, clockwise, and counterclockwise) are only used for identification purposes to aid the reader's understanding of the example of the invention, and do not create limitations, particularly as to the position, orientation, or use of the invention unless specifically set forth in the claims. Joinder references (e.g., attached, coupled, connected, joined, and the like) are to be construed broadly and may include intermediate members between a connection of elements and relative movement between elements. As such, joinder references do not necessarily infer that two elements are directly connected and in fixed relation to each other.
In some instances, components are described with reference to “ends” having a particular characteristic and/or being connected with another part. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is not limited to components which terminate immediately beyond their points of connection with other parts. Thus, the term “end” should be interpreted broadly, in a manner that includes areas adjacent, rearward, forward of, or otherwise near the terminus of a particular element, link, component, part, member or the like. In methodologies directly or indirectly set forth herein, various steps and operations are described in one possible order of operation, but those skilled in the art will recognize that steps and operations may be rearranged, replaced, or eliminated without necessarily departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. It is intended that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative only and not limiting. Changes in detail or structure may be made without departing from the spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that variations and alternative embodiments may be made given the foregoing description. Such variations and alternative embodiments are accordingly considered within the scope of the present invention.
The present application claims benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/168,538, filed Apr. 10, 2009. The present application is related to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/261,694, filed Nov. 16, 2009.
The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to contract number DE-AC05-00OR22725 between the United States Department of Energy and UT-Battelle, LLC.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
X26 | Williamson | Sep 1840 | |
1103736 | Gregory | May 1870 | A |
1419600 | Anderson | Jun 1922 | A |
1512482 | Patterson | Oct 1924 | A |
1725974 | Brautigam et al. | Aug 1929 | A |
1968088 | Mekler | Jul 1934 | A |
2383188 | Griswold | Aug 1945 | A |
2565677 | Campbell | Aug 1951 | A |
2786463 | Clarence | Mar 1957 | A |
3126881 | Matsky | Mar 1964 | A |
D214297 | Ihde | May 1969 | S |
3765397 | Henderson | Oct 1973 | A |
D229277 | Chang | Nov 1973 | S |
3851639 | Beddoe | Dec 1974 | A |
4034142 | Hecht | Jul 1977 | A |
4037580 | Angelo | Jul 1977 | A |
4167207 | Rao et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4206598 | Rao et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4257391 | Carin | Mar 1981 | A |
4291669 | Herne, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
4351316 | Kroll | Sep 1982 | A |
4471751 | Hottenroth et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4471985 | Mahoney | Sep 1984 | A |
4473059 | Nason | Sep 1984 | A |
4480436 | Maclin | Nov 1984 | A |
4502464 | Figueroa | Mar 1985 | A |
4512249 | Mentzel | Apr 1985 | A |
4587947 | Tomita | May 1986 | A |
4714659 | Lindgren et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4732138 | Vos | Mar 1988 | A |
4875462 | Armstrong | Oct 1989 | A |
4924845 | Johnson et al. | May 1990 | A |
4962696 | Gillis | Oct 1990 | A |
5002037 | Armstrong et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5024208 | Hottenroth et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5144939 | Christopherson | Sep 1992 | A |
5236787 | Grassi | Aug 1993 | A |
5267609 | Olsson | Dec 1993 | A |
5480608 | Tsuda et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5881709 | Daoust | Mar 1999 | A |
5909729 | Nowicke, Jr. | Jun 1999 | A |
5958603 | Ragland et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6012493 | Remke et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016797 | Nowicke, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6231807 | Berglund | May 2001 | B1 |
6314955 | Boetcker | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6470875 | Liu | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6615821 | Fisenko | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6651645 | Nunez Suarez | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6799632 | Hall et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
D512264 | May et al. | Dec 2005 | S |
7167642 | Wagner | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7469489 | Lewin | Dec 2008 | B2 |
D640497 | Lorenz et al. | Jun 2011 | S |
8025984 | Stamm | Sep 2011 | B2 |
20030234014 | Fitzgerald | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040020659 | Hall et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050229916 | Fitzgerald | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070042304 | Lewin | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20090025703 | Van Der Sluis et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090165769 | Van Der Sluis | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100083946 | Cedar et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100258104 | Defoort et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2371473 | Jul 2002 | GB |
2002115848 | Apr 2002 | JP |
WO 2006132556 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2009070952 | Jun 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 15, 2010, PCT/US2010/030514, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 2, 2011, Application No. PCT/US20108056790, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100258104 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61168538 | Apr 2009 | US |