The present invention relates to particle accelerator target arrangements and more particularly to a method and apparatus for cooling these and similar such targets, e.g. laser targets, that obviates the need for rastering of the incoming beam to obtain adequate target cooling.
The need to generate uniform or homogeneous patterns of electron beams directed at suitable targets in order to minimize localized heating and concomitant target damage is well known to those skilled in the art of particle accelerator, laser processing and the like operations. Such requirements also exist in such industrial applications as ion implantation and in medical therapy using charged particle beams. Commonly, sinusoidal or rotating beam raster systems are used to produce beam patterns that constantly vary the area of the target that is impacted by the beam with the objective of avoiding localized heating of the target material.
Beam rastering in a common practice for dealing with high local power deposition in accelerator and the like apparatus that involve beam interaction with a target. However, the rastering technique is limited because it is not always possible to increase the area covered by the rastered beam at the target face fast enough to be able to dissipate all of the generated heat. Also, large beam rastering can be a source of systematic errors in many experiments and cause elevated experimental and environmental radiation background, especially in experiments involving electron beams.
Another common practice in such circumstances is making the target moveable, and designed large enough to be able to dissipate all of the power deposited thereon. The position of the impact area in the target changes in time in essentially the same way as occurs in the rastering method. The advantages of such a method include a much larger capability to dissipate locally deposited heat, and the option to keep the position of the beam interaction region fixed in the laboratory frame. While such target movements sometimes are adequate to solve the target overheating problem they often do not provide adequate cooling of the target between beam impacts to adequately avoid target overheating. For example, target rotation with a constant beam direction, i.e. without rastering of the particle beam, can provide adequate cooling in some circumstances where target speed can be slowed adequately. This, however, is not an ideal solution nor is it appropriate for many of the situations in which particle, laser or the like beams are applied. This is especially true in those case where beam impact is necessary for a prolonged period of time to obtain a desired experimental result.
Target cooling in such applications is further complicated by the general location of particle beam, laser or the like targets in, for example, vacuum environments that do not permit the easy use of convection or conductive cooling techniques. Such is particularly true in those cases where localized target overheating is sought to be avoided by target rotation.
Thus, there exists a need for an apparatus and method that permits adequate target movement and/or cooling during particle or the like beam impact to provide the level of target cooling necessary to obtain satisfactory target/beam interaction without overheating.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a particle or the like beam target apparatus that is capable of achieving target cooling during beam impact, especially during target irradiation for extended periods of time.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for cooling particle or other beam targets that operate in a vacuum or the like and are rotated either to reduce target heating or to insure exposure of new target areas to the particle beam during operation.
According to the present invention, there is provided a novel beam target apparatus comprising: a rotating target disc thermally coupled to a first array of spaced-apart parallel plate fins that mesh without physical contact with a second array of spaced-apart fins that are thermally coupled to a conductor capable of removing heat from said second array of spaced-apart parallel plate fins. Thermal exchange occurs between the two arrays of meshing, spaced-apart parallel plate fins through radiation. There is also provided a method of cooling a rotating beam target through the use of the previously described apparatus.
The apparatus described herein is proposed for use in beam impingement applications where large power deposition in the target area is anticipated and where beam rastering is either undesirable or impossible or does not solve the overheating problem. According the apparatus described herein, the target takes the shape of a flat ring or disc of constant thickness installed around the perimeter of a suitable cylinder playing the role of a heat sink. The cylinder is mounted on two bearings and can be rotated by a drive motor around a cylindrical heat sink. Two arrays of parallel plate fins are attached to the inner diameter of the target cylinder and to the outer diameter of the heat sink cylinder and inserted between each other in non-contacting relationship. When a beam, electron, laser or the like strikes the rotating target, heat is evenly distributed around the entire target ring and heat is transferred by conduction and radiation to the heat sink.
Referring now to
As will be known to the skilled artisan, radiational heat exchange from hot parallel plate fins 18 to cold parallel plate fins 30 is defined as a heat flux H=FradS c (T4hot−T4cold) where Frad is a coefficient dependent upon the parallel plate surface properties, S is radiating area; c=5.7 10−12 W cm−2 K−4, the Stefan-Boltzman constant and T is temperature in degrees Kelvin. If Tcold is neglected and assume for a simple exercise the equilibrium temperature of the heat sink to be 1000° K, outer radius of a coolant pipe 2 cm, the inner radius of the heat sink 10 cm and Frad conservatively as 0.3 the heat flux exiting one single hot fin equals approximately 0.3×600×5.7×10004 which is about 1 kW, if one assumes that the heat flux at this rate can be absorbed by the coolant. More detailed calculations are needed for a specific optimized design, but this simple example shows that the heat exchange capability of such a device is not at all trivial. Depending upon the target and beam required for a specific application, or class of applications, the parameters of the device such as dimensions, specific choice of materials, number and thickness of the radiating fins, etc. can be readily defined. Thus, the appropriate area and surface characteristics of any particular cooling apparatus as described herein can be readily determined and the appropriate apparatus designed for any particular application by a competent engineer given the description of the apparatus contained herein.
Operationally, heat generated by the impact of beam 14 on target 12 is transmitted by conduction through retainer 20 to first radial array of parallel plate fins 18. This heat is then transmitted by radiation to second radial array of parallel plate fins 30 and then by conduction through wall 32 to the coolant inside of coolant conduit 28 to the contained coolant where it is extracted from the system.
It is further envisioned that in the proper circumstance, an apparatus wherein target disc 12 and associated retainer member 20 and first array of parallel plate spaced-apart fins 18 rotate inside of second array of parallel plate spaced-apart fins 30 and coolant conduit 28 encompasses the entire assembly 10 is contained within the envelope defined by a circumferential coolant conduit 28. Such an arrangement is depicted in
As the invention has been described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the same may be varied in many ways without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Any and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
The United States of America may have certain rights to this invention under Management and Operating contract No. DE-AC05-84ER 40150 from the Department of Energy.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4309637 | Fetter | Jan 1982 | A |
4916015 | Schaffner et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4943989 | Lounsberry et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
6115454 | Andrews et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6519317 | Richardson et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |