This invention relates generally to the field of gas (combustion) turbine engines, and more particularly to a transition duct connecting a combustor and a turbine in a gas turbine engine.
The transition duct (transition member) 1 of a gas turbine engine 2 (
The manufacturing process used to form the component further exacerbates the stress concentration in the corners of the transition duct 10. Prior art transition members are formed by welding together a plurality of panels that have been pre-formed to a desired curved shape.
One embodiment of a transition duct 30 built in accordance with the present invention is shown in cross-sectional view of
Several features of the duct 30 facilitate two-panel construction. First, the minimum radius of curvature of corners 34 is increased when compared to the radius of curvature of the corners 26 of prior art designs. A typical range of radius of curvature R1 for prior art designs may be 15-25 mm, whereas the radius of curvature R2 for ducts built in accordance with the present invention may be at least 35 mm or in the range of 35-50 mm. The increased corner radii result in a reduced stress concentration within the component.
Another feature of the duct 30 that facilitates two-panel construction is a reduced radius of curvature of the duct 30 in the direction of the axis of flow of the combustion gas when compared to prior art designs. This may be more clearly appreciated by comparing the transition ducts 44, 46 of
Two-panel construction is also facilitated by using panels that are thinner than those of prior art ducts. Typical prior art panels have a thickness in the range of 6-8 mm and the panels 36, 38 of the present invention may have a thickness in the range of 4.5-5 mm. Collectively, the changes in the bend radius and the thickness of the panels function to reduce forming strains to a sufficiently low level so that the integrity of the cooling channels 32 in the corners 34 is maintained.
An increase in the corner radius R2 will generally tend to increase the exit flow loss of the gas flowing through the duct 30 due to the resulting restriction of cross-sectional flow area assuming all other dimensions are maintained constant. This exit flow loss may be offset by increasing the arcuate width W of duct 30 when compared to the width of an equivalent prior art duct, thereby recovering cross-sectional flow area that may be lost as a result of an increased corner radii. The arcuate width of a transition duct is limited by the size of the gap G that must be maintained between the exit mouth ends of adjacent transition ducts 48, 50 in the cold/ambient condition in order to accommodate thermal growth of the components. This gap G in prior art designs is generally 40-50 mm. Because the entire width of transition duct 30 of the present invention is effectively cooled, the thermal growth of the duct along the arcuate width axis is reduced when compared to prior art design 10 where portions of the width proximate the corners are not cooled. Accordingly, the required gap G between adjacent ducts built in accordance with the present invention may be less than 40 mm, for example up to as much as 50% less, e.g. in the range of 20-25 mm. In certain embodiments, the increase in cross-sectional flow area that is gained by decreasing the required gap size G is greater than the decrease in cross-sectional flow area that is lost by increasing corner radius R2, thereby providing a net lower exit flow loss.
A two-panel transition duct 30 is less expensive to fabricate because it requires less welding than an equivalent four-panel design. Individual panels having integral cooling channels are fabricated using known processes, such as by forming each panel of at least two layers of material with the cooling channels being formed as grooves in a first layer prior to joining the second layer over the grooved surface. The panels are initially formed flat and are trimmed with a precision cutting process such as laser trimming. The two-panel design requires less laser cutting of panels than a four-panel design. Fit-up problems are also reduced when compared to a four-panel design. As a result of better fit-up, the spacing between adjacent cooling channels 32 may be reduced relative to previous designs, thereby further enhancing the cooling effectiveness, reducing thermal gradients and increasing the low-cycle fatigue life of the component. Prior art designs may use spacing between adjacent cooling channels of 20-25 mm, whereas the spacing for the present invention may be only 10-15 mm in some embodiments.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3750398 | Adelizzi et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
4016718 | Lauck | Apr 1977 | A |
4195474 | Bintz et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4413470 | Scheihing et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4422288 | Steber | Dec 1983 | A |
4719748 | Davis, Jr. et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4819438 | Schultz | Apr 1989 | A |
4903477 | Butt | Feb 1990 | A |
5237813 | Harris et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5761898 | Barnes et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5826430 | Little | Oct 1998 | A |
5906093 | Coslow et al. | May 1999 | A |
5960632 | Abuaf et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6085514 | Benim et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6109019 | Sugishita | Aug 2000 | A |
6116013 | Moller | Sep 2000 | A |
6116018 | Tanimura et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6298656 | Donovan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6345494 | Coslow | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6412268 | Cromer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6450762 | Munshi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463742 | Mandai et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6523352 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6546627 | Sekihara et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6568187 | Jorgensen et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6619915 | Jorgensen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6644032 | Jorgensen et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
20020112483 | Kondo et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030140633 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030167776 | Coppola | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030192320 | Farmer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 087 066 | May 1982 | GB |
62176448 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62150543 | Apr 1987 | JP |
03030540 | Aug 1991 | JP |
2001271655 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2003193866 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2004060574 | Feb 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060185345 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |