The disclosure relates to a cooling apparatus for cooling a metallic material, in particular after rolling of the metallic material and to a method for cooling a metallic material.
A use of cooling apparatuses along with methods for the production and operation of cooling beams are generally known.
For example, WO 2016/189903 A1 discloses a binary solution, with which overcooling of the metallic material in the edge area is compensated for by providing width masking at the edges of the metallic material in conjunction with coolant collecting tanks.
European patent EP 2 155 411 B1 also discloses a solution for reducing uneven temperature distribution, in particular at the edges of a metallic material. Here as well, masks are provided for covering the edges, wherein, however, such masks can be moved or adjusted, as the case may be, in the width direction and also allow a certain amount of coolant to pass through to the edges of the material to be cooled.
European patent specification EP 2 986 400 B1 discloses a cooling beam with several chambers that can be individually applied with the coolant. Thus, different pressures or volume flows for the coolant can be adjusted across the width of the nozzle beam. In particular, the pressure or volume flow distribution of the coolant across the width of the cooling beam can be adapted to the actual temperature curve across the width of the metal material in the inlet of a cooling apparatus. With a constant density distribution of the spray nozzles on the cooling beam in the width direction, linear coolant volume flows in particular can be adjusted across the width of the cooling beam. This may be good for linear temperature distributions across the width.
However, the actual curves of temperature distribution across the width of the metallic material to be cooled or of the cooling beam, as the case may be, do not usually run purely linearly; rather, they often are degressive or progressive. In such cases, the linear distribution of the coolant in individual width sections of the cooling beam as disclosed in EP' 400 B1 is not expedient with regard to the desired greater accuracy in compensating for given temperature profiles. In particular, this can sometimes lead to undesired overcooling of the edges of the metallic material.
WO 2015/113832 A1 discloses a cooling device for cooling a metallic item, comprising: at least one cooling beam with a plurality of coolant application elements for applying a coolant to the metallic material, each coolant application element having an outlet opening with a cross-sectional area for the coolant to exit; the thickness of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings of the coolant application elements in the width direction of the cooling bar is distributed and dimensioned in accordance with the amount of the gradient of the distribution of the temperature of the metallic material over its width before it enters the cooling bar. The density of the cross-sectional areas is constant according to the distribution of the temperature of the metallic good over its width.
The disclosure is based on the object of further developing a known use of a cooling apparatus and a known method for its production in such a manner that the cooling effect produced by the cooling apparatus on the metallic material can be better adapted to a real inlet temperature distribution.
This object with respect to the use is achieved by the subject matter as claimed.
In the context of this description, the term “density of cross-sectional areas” means the sum of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings of the coolant application elements per unit area of the cooling beam. In simple terms, such density designates the ratio of the outlet area for the coolant to the unit area of the cooling beam. As an alternative to the cross-sectional area of the outlet opening on the coolant application element, the term “cross-sectional area” can also mean the cross-sectional area of a spray spot on the material to be cooled.
Through the claimed distribution of the density of the cross-sectional areas according to or corresponding to, as the case may be, the amount of the slope of the distribution of the temperature of the metallic material across its width, it is possible to adapt the cooling capacity—even when the metallic material is applied with a constant coolant volume flow or coolant pressure—much more precisely to the actual temperature conditions in the metallic material. In particular, progressive or degressive temperature curves can also be compensated for or cooled, as the case may be, in a highly precise manner. If, for example, the temperature decreases towards the edges of the metallic material, the slope towards the edges becomes increasingly steeper and the density of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings of the coolant application elements is to be reduced accordingly. Conversely, the following applies: If, for example, the temperature rises towards the edges, more cooling is then required, which cooling is achieved by increasing the coolant outlet area of the application elements in the corresponding width ranges.
In accordance with a first exemplary embodiment, it is determined that the density of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings of the coolant application elements is represented or can be represented, as the case may be, by the gap between two adjacent coolant application elements projected onto the width direction of the cooling beam. Specifically, it is proposed that such projected gap in the width direction of the cooling beam is increased towards an edge of the cooling beam if the temperature of the metallic material decreases towards such edge of the cooling beam. Due to the decrease in temperature, less cooling power is then required in such width ranges, which is achieved by increasing the projected gap between individual, in particular adjacent, nozzles. This is equivalent to a reduction in the density of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings of the coolant application elements.
Despite the dependence between the density of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings and the magnitude of the slope, the density of the cross-sectional areas does not by any means need to become zero if the magnitude of the slope is zero, that is, if the temperature distribution in the width direction is constant. Typically, the density of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings in the width direction is then also constant across the corresponding width section, but typically not equal to zero, more precisely greater than zero.
As already mentioned above, the disclosure offers the advantage that, even if the material to be cooled is applied with a constant volume flow or a constant pressure, as the case may be, of the coolant across the width of the cooling beam, the aforementioned precise adaptation of the cooling capacity to the actual temperature profile can be achieved solely by means of the corresponding disclosed density distribution of the coolant application elements with their respective cross-sectional areas. This is not contradicted by the fact that, in addition to the disclosed distribution of the density of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings, the volume flow or the pressure of the coolant can also be adjusted differently in individual width ranges, in order to adapt the distribution of the coolant and the cooling capacity in the width direction to the real temperature distribution.
For this purpose, the cooling beam can preferably be designed with several individual cooling chambers, which are applied with coolant in different ways. This typically takes place via valves assigned to the individual chambers, which are individually controlled by a control unit.
The aforementioned object is further solved by a method for producing or selecting a cooling beam for a cooling apparatus. The disclosed selection of a cooling beam concerns the case where the user has a plurality of different cooling beams in stock and he has to select a suitable cooling beam for a certain application.
The invention is described in detail below on the basis of the specified figures in the form of exemplary embodiments. In all figures, the same technical elements are designated with the same reference signs.
The coolant application elements 112 are arranged in
In the first exemplary embodiment shown in
In general, the cross-sectional areas 112′ of the outlet openings of the coolant application elements 112 on the cooling beam 110 can all be the same size, but do not have to be. For example, spray nozzles, each with a cylindrical coolant jet, can be provided as coolant application elements 112, wherein the cross-sectional areas 112 of the outlet openings of the coolant application elements 112 touch each other, as shown in
The cooling beam is produced or selected individually with regard to a given temperature distribution of the metallic material prior to entering the cooling apparatus. Different temperature distributions require different density distributions of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings of the coolant application elements. The following steps are to be carried out for the production:
Initially, the temperature distribution of the metallic material to be cooled must be determined across its width prior to entering under the cooling beam. Such determined temperature distribution is then to be evaluated with regard to width sections Δy, in which the temperature rises, remains constant or falls. This evaluation takes place by evaluating or determining, as the case may be, the slope of the temperature distribution. Temperature distribution is understood as a functional relationship between the temperature and the width direction of the metallic material or the cooling beam, wherein such functional relationship can be determined by interpolation of individual temperature measured values in the width direction.
The sign of the slope is of no importance; therefore, the amounts of the slopes at individual places or points, as the case may be, in the width direction must be determined. The cooling beam is then to be equipped with coolant application elements in the width direction in such a manner that the density of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings, that is, the density of the coolant outlet areas of the coolant application elements in the width direction of the cooling beam, is distributed and dimensioned according to the amount of the slope of the distribution of the temperature of the metallic material across its width before the inlet under the cooling beam. If the temperature rises towards the edges of the metallic material, the density of the cross-sectional areas of the outlet openings is also to be increased, because more cooling capacity is then required in the edge areas. Conversely, if the temperature decreases towards the edges of the metallic material, less cooling power is required; as such, it is sufficient to dimension the density of the cross-sectional areas there less than in the central area of the metallic material or the cooling beam, as the case may be.
In the second exemplary embodiment, the reduced density of the cross-sectional areas in the edge areas of the cooling beam is realized by increasing the gaps between the coolant traces 114 on the metallic material to be cooled towards the edges. In particular, such gaps a, a1, a2, a3 can be greater than zero; that is, the coolant tracks do not have to be directly adjacent and close to each other, but spaced apart.
Due to the increasing drop in temperature towards the edges of the metal strip 200, the gaps a, a1, a2, a3 towards the edges also become increasingly larger.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2018 205 619.6 | Apr 2018 | DE | national |
10 2018 211 177.4 | Jul 2018 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/058124 | 4/1/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/197182 | 10/17/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5909764 | Sartschev | Jun 1999 | A |
6062056 | Groch | May 2000 | A |
7328598 | Cramer | Feb 2008 | B2 |
20100132426 | Baumgärtel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20160052033 | Chen et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20210154713 | Grosse Lordemann | May 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
S63149954 | Oct 1988 | JP |
2016515474 | May 2016 | JP |
2008145222 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2014170139 | Oct 2014 | WO |
2015113832 | Aug 2015 | WO |
2016189903 | Dec 2016 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210154713 A1 | May 2021 | US |