This invention relates to cooling of turbine component walls using a cooling fluid, such as on a gas turbine duct.
Components such as combustor-to-turbine transition ducts that are in combustion gas flow areas of gas turbines require cooling to maintain design temperatures. Cooling efficiency is important in order to minimize the usage of air diverted from the compressor for cooling. Impingement cooling is a technique in which a perforated wall is spaced from a hot wall to be cooled. Cooling air flows through the perforations and forms jets that impinge on the hot wall. However, the impinged air then flows across the wall surface, interfering with other impingement jets. This is called “cross-flow interference” herein. Other cooling techniques use elements such as cooling channels, fins, and pins to provide increased surface area for convective/conductive heat transfer. However, the coolant becomes warmer with distance, reducing uniformity of cooling. Film cooling provides an insulating film of cooling air on a hot gas flow surface via holes through the wall from a coolant supply. This can be effective, but uses a high amount of coolant.
Combinations of cooling techniques have been used, as exemplified by US Patent Application Publication No. US 2008/0276619 A1, which teaches a cooling channel having a plurality of impingement jet inlets and a plurality of outlets. However, as the combustion temperatures in advanced turbine designs continue to increase, there is an ongoing need for improved cooling arrangements.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
In one embodiment, the present invention combines an impingement cooling zone chamber, a convective heat transfer zone with multiple channels, and a film cooling zone chamber leading to plurality of metering film cooling outlets, in a way that provides more flexible independent optimization of each zone and a higher degree of synergy and complementation among the zones that maximizes cooling efficiency and uniformity.
The cooling zones 62, 64, 66 may be independent of each other, as shown, in which case the impingement holes 70 and film cooling holes 78 are not within the channels 76, or within or beside the heat transfer elements 76, 77. A benefit of this independence is that each zone can be independently optimized. This allows each zone to be designed for efficiency within itself in addition to complementation in the sequence of zones to achieve a desired cooling rate profile along the length of the chamber, as later described in more detail.
The counts of impingement holes 70, channels 76, and film cooling holes 78 may be different from each other. They may be selected in combination with sizes of the heat transfer elements 76, 78 for optimum cooling of each zone, for example to provide optimum flow speeds in the holes and convection cooling elements.
The channels 76 may be narrow enough to meter the coolant flow 84 and cause a pressure drop across the convection zone 64. This provides four different pressure zones—A first pressure P1 of the cooling air 48 outside the component wall 52, a second pressure P2 in the impingement plenum 74, a third pressure P3 in the film cooling plenum 80, and a fourth pressure P4 of the hot gas flow 36 inside the wall 52. Some prior art designs have only three pressure zones as follows: 1) the coolant air outside the component, 2) in the space between dual walls of the component, and 3) the pressure of the hot gas flow. Providing four pressure zones P1, P2, P3, P4 in the present invention reduces the pressure differential between the cooling air 48 outside the component and within the impingement plenum, and between the film cooling plenum and the hot gas flow 36, thus reducing the coolant mass flow to use coolant more efficiency. For example, the convection and film metering may be designed such that the pressure difference P2-P1 is equal or substantially equal to the pressure difference P4-P3, thus reducing both pressure differences as much as possible.
Coolant metering by the channels 76 increases cooling efficiency in the convection zone, and controls the flow speed through the convection zone. It causes the pressure in the impingement plenum 74 to equalize across the width of the plenum by pausing the flow therein. This equalizes flow among all channels 76 across the width of the convection zone 64. This results in equal coolant temperature across the width of the film cooling plenum, because it has flowed equally through all the channels 76 of the convection zone. Further metering by the film cooling holes 78 causes pressure to equalize in the film cooling plenum, which equalizes flow among the film holes 78 across the width of the film cooling plenum 80. These factors provide widthwise uniformity of cooling across a chamber 60.
The impingement plenum 74 is enclosed by the chamber walls 60 to define a single outflow direction 84 into the convection zone, and thence to the film cooling plenum 80. This directed flow provides uniformity and control of the cooling rate profile because the flow is not subject to random variability. Each chamber C1, C2, C3 can be customized in the above respects to provide a desired cooling level for a given location on the turbine component, depending on conditions of gas pressures P1, P4 and heat at that location.
The number, length, and thickness of the fins 77 and the size of the channels 76 controls the cooling rate profile of the convection zone and the temperature rise of the coolant. The coolant temperature in the film cooling zone 80, and metering by the film cooling holes, controls the film cooling profile. Using these design variables, the cooling rate profiles 84, 79 of
Efficiencies of different cooling techniques and devices may be compared based on the percentage of compressor air 48 required to meet a given cooling specification. The higher this percentage, the less air is available for the useful work of combustion, and the lower is the engine efficiency. Various cooling techniques and combinations were evaluated by the inventors, and they found that the present combination provides the highest efficiency of those tested. It reduced cooling air use by over 50% compared to film cooling alone. This was an unexpectedly high improvement.
The present invention advantageously provides the component designer with previously unavailable options for designing an optimal cooling scheme because the functionality of the various cooling zones can be configured independently of each other. For example, the use of an impingement cooling plenum 74 for receiving and collecting the combined impingement jet flows 72 allows the number, location, size and arrangement of the impingement holes 70 to be selected independently of other downstream features. The impingement cooling plenum 74 then feeds coolant to multiple channels 76, the number, size and features of which can be configured independent of each other and independent of the upstream and downstream structures. The convection cooling zone 64 channels then feed the film cooling plenum 80, which allows the number, size and arrangement of the film cooling holes 78 to be configured independently of all other upstream structures. In combination, the present invention makes use of three independently configurable cooling mechanisms to provide an integrated cooling arrangement that exceeds the cooling efficiency of known cooling arrangements.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3652181 | Wilhelm, Jr. | Mar 1972 | A |
4446693 | Pidcock et al. | May 1984 | A |
4695247 | Enzaki et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4719748 | Davis, Jr. et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5528904 | Jones et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5605046 | Liang | Feb 1997 | A |
6018950 | Moeller | Feb 2000 | A |
6602053 | Subramanian et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6837050 | Mandai et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6964170 | Alkabie | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6981358 | Belluchi et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7195458 | Liang | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7219498 | Hadder | May 2007 | B2 |
7310938 | Marcum et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7488156 | Liang | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7694522 | Nakae et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8147205 | Digard Brou De Cuissart et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20010004835 | Alkabie et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020152740 | Suenaga et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20060130484 | Marcum et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140762 | Pietraszkiewicz et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060210399 | Kitamura et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080276619 | Chopra et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090252593 | Chila et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100071382 | Liang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100223931 | Chila et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100242485 | Davis et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251722 | Woolford et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110185739 | Bronson et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110247341 | McMahan et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120034075 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |