1. Field of the Invention
The subject invention relates to a cooling assembly for cooling an electronic device such as a microprocessor or a computer chip.
2. Description of the Prior Art
These electronic devices generate a high concentration of heat, typically a power density in the range of 5 to 35 W/cm2. Accordingly, research activities have focused on developing more efficient cooling assemblies capable of efficiently dissipating the heat generated from such electronic devices, while occupying a minimum of space.
A forced air cooling assembly typically includes a heat exchanger and a heat sink, and cools the electronic device by natural or forced convection cooling methods. The electronic device is attached to the heat sink and transfers heat thereto. The heat exchanger typically uses air to directly remove the heat from the heat sink. However, air has a relatively low heat capacity. Such forced air cooling assemblies are suitable for removing heat from relatively low power heat sources with a power density in the range of 5 to 15 W/cm2. However, the increased computing speeds have resulted in a corresponding increase in the power density of the electronic devices in the order of 20 to 35 W/cm2, thus requiring more effective cooling assemblies.
In response to the increased heat produced by the electronic devices, liquid-cooled cooling assemblies, commonly referred to as liquid cooled units (“LCUs”) were developed. The LCUs employ a heat sink in conjunction with a high heat capacity cooling fluid, like water or water-glycol solutions, to remove heat from these types of higher power density heat sources. One type of LCU circulates the cooling fluid through the heat sink to remove the heat absorbed from the heat source affixed thereto. The cooling fluid is then transferred to a remote location where the heat is easily dissipated into a flowing air stream with the use of a liquid-to-air heat exchanger and an air moving device such as a fan or a blower. These types of LCUs are characterized as indirect cooling units since they remove heat form the heat source indirectly by a secondary working fluid. Generally, a single-phase liquid first removes heat from the heat sink and then dissipates it into the air stream flowing through the remotely located liquid-to-air heat exchanger. Such LCUs are satisfactory for a moderate heat flux less than 35 to 45 W/cm2.
The amount of heat transferred between the heat sink and the cooling fluid is dependent upon a heat transfer coefficient therebetween. The heat transfer coefficient is dependent upon a temperature gradient between the heat sink and the cooing fluid, with the higher heat transfer coefficient corresponding to higher temperature gradients, i.e., the higher the temperature gradient between the heat sink and the cooling fluid, the more heat the cooling fluid will remove. The amount of heat stored in the base plate and each of the fins varies according to the distance from the heat source, with the highest concentration of heat occurring directly above the heat source in the base plate.
The U.S. Pat. No. 5,304,846 issued to Azer et. al., and the U.S. Pat. No. 6,422,307 issued to Bhatti et. al., each disclose a heat sink for a LCU. The heat sink assemblies include a base plate with a plurality of fins having smooth sidewalls extending upwardly from the base plate. In operation, the fins absorb heat through the base plate, with less heat being absorbed the farther the fin gets from the heat source. The cooling fluid is introduced into the heat sink at the outer periphery thereof, either parallel to or impinging on the fins. The flow of cooling fluid absorbs a portion of the heat from the outer periphery of the heat sink before contacting the highest heat concentration in the heat sink. The heat absorbed from the outer periphery of the heat sink increases the temperature of the cooling fluid, thereby lowering the temperature gradient between the cooling fluid and the heat sink when the cooling fluid finally arrives at the highest concentration of heat in the heat sink, thereby decreasing the efficiency of the heat sink.
The subject invention provides a cooling assembly for removing heat from an electronic device. The assembly includes a pump for circulating a flow of cooling fluid and a heat exchanger for removing the heat from the flow of cooling fluid. A heat sink transfers the heat from the electronic device to the flow of cooling fluid, and includes a base plate for engaging the electronic device. The base plate has a top surface and a plurality of fins in spaced and parallel relationship extending upwardly from the top surface of the base plate a pre-determined height to a top extremity. A nozzle defining an exit directs the flow of cooling fluid into the plurality of fins, with the exit of the nozzle being disposed below the top extremity of the plurality of fins for discharging the flow of cooling fluid adjacent the top surface of the base plate.
Accordingly, the subject invention provides an improved cooling assembly with the nozzle disposed in close proximity to the base plate of the heat sink so that the flow of cooling fluid is discharged adjacent the base plate for removing the heat from the base plate, which has the highest concentration of heat. The flow of cooling fluid then circulates upward through the plurality of fins, removing the remaining heat from the fins as the cooling fluid flows past. Therefore, the subject invention increases the temperature gradient between the highest concentration of heat in the base plate, which is over the electronic device, and the flow of cooling fluid, thereby increasing the efficiency of the heat sink.
Other advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated, as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings wherein:
Referring to the Figures, wherein like numerals indicates like or corresponding parts throughout the several views; a heat sink is generally shown at 20.
Referring to
Referring to
In the preferred embodiment, a first angled wall 40 extends upwardly from a first intersection 42 with the first vertical wall 36 to the top extremity 32, and a second angled wall 44 extends upwardly from a second intersection 46 with the second vertical wall 38 to the top extremity 32. The first angled wall 40 and the second angled wall 44 diverge from each other as they extend upwardly from the first vertical wall 36 and second vertical wall 38 respectively. The first intersection 42 and the second intersection 46 are disposed a pre-determined distance above the top surface 28 of the base plate 22. While the preferred embodiment of the heat sink 20 includes the first and second angled walls 40, 44, the first and second angled walls 40, 44 are not necessary for the heat sink 20 of the subject invention to operate. Accordingly, an alternative embodiment of the heat sink is shown generally at 120 in
The electronic device 26 generates an amount of heat to be dissipated, the heat being transferred from the electronic device 26 to the bottom surface 24 of the base plate 22 of the heat sink 20. The heat is then conducted from the base plate 22 to the fins 30. A nozzle 50 discharges an impinging flow of cooling fluid 23 for removing the heat from the heat sink 20 as it circulates therethrough.
The nozzle 50 is disposed within the notch 34 and defines an exit 54 for directing the flow of cooling fluid 23 into the fins 30. The exit 54 of the nozzle 50 is disposed below the top extremity 32 of the fins 30 for discharging the flow of cooling fluid 23 adjacent the top surface 28 of the base plate 22. This orientation of the nozzle 50, in close proximity to the base plate 22, provides for a higher temperature gradient between the flow of cooling fluid 23 and the highest concentration of heat, which occurs at the base plate 22 directly above the heat source (the electronic device 26).
Referring to
Referring to
Optionally, as shown in
Referring to
The nozzle 50 includes a rectangular cross-section and a hydraulic diameter (dh) defined by the equation:
The preferred values of the hydraulic diameter (dh) are in the range of 0.02 in≦dh≦0.08 in (0.5 mm≦dh≦2 mm).
The heat transfer rate between the heat sink 20 and the flow of cooling fluid 23 increases as the nozzle 50 encroaches the top surface 28 of the base plate 22. This is because as the nozzle 50 is brought closer to the top surface 28 of the base plate 22, the free jet region of the flow of cooling fluid 23 diminishes, and as a result, the flow velocity of the impinging jet flow of cooling fluid 23 is higher. The preferred spacing(s) of the nozzle 50 from the top surface 28 of the base plate 22 is expressible in terms of the hydraulic diameter (dh) of the nozzle 50, and is preferably in the range of 0.1≦s/dh≦1.
The side openings 64 in the nozzle 50 include a diameter (d) that is expressible in terms of the width (a) and length (b) of the nozzle 50, and are preferably in the range of 0.2√{square root over (ab)}≦d≦√{square root over (ab)}.
The fins 30, as shown in the preferred embodiment of the heat sink generally shown at 20 in
{dot over (q)}=hA(Ts−T∞) (2)
where “Ts” is the surface temperature of the fins 30, and “T∞” is the circumambient temperature of the cooling fluid 23.
As noted above, the heat transfer coefficient (h) varies linearly with respect to the distance (x) from the nozzle 50, and is defined by the equation:
h=hi+α(x−xi) (3)
where “α” is a constant.
The surface area (A) related to the distance (x) from the nozzle 50 is represented by the equation:
Introducing Equations (3) and (4) into Equation (2), the following equation is obtained.
Specializing this relation for x=xo, to cover the entire surface area of the fins 30 and solving the resulting equation for the constant “α”, the following equation is obtained.
Introducing Equation (6) into Equation (3), we obtain the following relation for the variation of the heat transfer coefficient (h) with the distance (x) from the nozzle 50, which is defined by the equation:
Noting that the surface area (A) of the fin is expressible as
Equation (7) can be manipulated to define the heat transfer coefficient (h) by the equation:
where “hi” is the heat transfer coefficient at the first or second vertical walls 36, 38; and can be determined by the equation:
where “Nui” is defined by the equation:
where “k” is the thermal conductivity of the impinging flow of cooling fluid 23. “Re” is defined by the equation:
where “{dot over (m)}” is the mass flow rate of the flow of cooling fluid 23, “μ” is the dynamic viscosity of the cooling fluid 23. “Pr” is defined by the equation:
where “μ” is the dynamic viscosity of the cooling fluid 23, “cp” is the isobaric specific heat of the cooling fluid 23, and “k” is the thermal conductivity of the cooling fluid 23.
The exponent (n) in Equation (10) is given by the equation
The range of validity of Equation (10) is as follows:
The height (c) of the fins 30 varies linearly with the distance (x) from the nozzle 50 and is defined by the equation:
c=βx (16)
where “β” is a constant.
Applying Equation (16) to the inner (xi) and outer (xo) edges of the fins 30, the following relationship is obtained:
Thus, knowing the distances (xi) and (xo) and one of the fin heights, say (ci) the other fin height (co) can be determined from Equation (17).
From heat conduction considerations, the optimal height of the first and second vertical walls 36, 38 is defined by the equation:
where “t” is the thickness of the fins 30, and “Bit” is a dimensionless quantity called the Biot number defined by the equation:
where “kf” is the thermal conductivity of the fin material. Therefore, knowing the heat transfer coefficient (hi) at the first or second vertical walls 36, 38 as described above, the optimum value of the height (ci) of the first or second vertical walls 36, 38 can be determined from Equations (18) and (19).
The foregoing invention has been described in accordance with the relevant legal standards; thus, the description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed embodiment may become apparent to those skilled in the art and do come within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of legal protection afforded this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4884630 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4940085 | Nelson et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4977444 | Nakajima et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5021924 | Kieda et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5132780 | Higgins, III | Jul 1992 | A |
5304846 | Azar | Apr 1994 | A |
5349831 | Daikoku et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5987892 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6105373 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6422307 | Bhatti | Jul 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060207746 A1 | Sep 2006 | US |