Patent Grant
8083085
The present invention relates to an improved method and produce packaging configuration enabling the improved packing, cooling, storage, and shipping of produce. More particularly, the present invention improves a flow of cooling air through a container system (comprising vented produce containers aligned in vented holding trays) to substantially improve the rate of cooling in produce contained therein.
Many produce products are harvested and packed in the field into containers which are ultimately purchased by the end consumer. Examples of such produce items include, but are not limited to, tomatoes, berries, grapes, mushrooms, radishes and broccoli florets. Many of these produce items require substantial post-harvest cooling in order to enable shipping over long distances and to prolong shelf life.
In use, a grower's harvesting crew harvests produce items of the type previously discussed directly from the plant in the field into the container. The containers are then loaded into trays, which contain a specific number of individual containers and the trays, when filled, are loaded onto pallets. The most common pallet used in the produce industry in the United States is the forty by forty-eight inch (40″×48″) wooden pallet, and the vast majority of produce handling, storage and shipping equipment is designed around pallets of this size.
After the pallets have been filled and loaded in the field, they are transported to shippers who perform a variety of post-harvest processes to enhance the marketability of the produce itself. For many types of produce, including berries, a significant packing evolution is the post-harvest cooling of the packed fruit. Indeed, berry shippers are often referred to as “coolers”. The process of cooling berries typically includes injecting a stream of cooling air into one side of a tray and thence through the individual baskets and around the berries stored therein. As the air cools the berries, it picks up heat therefrom which is exhausted from apertures on the opposite side of the tray.
One commonly used packaging configuration is referred to in the industry as the so-called “five-down” packaging configuration. It is referred to a five down package because at each layer of a pallet five “trays” are stacked. Each of the “trays” is loaded with produce containers filled with produce. In some approaches each of the trays has many vents all over each side of the tray or no vents at all. In such cases the prior art has not paid much attention to vent placement. The point of this prior philosophy being that more vents is better. Alternatively, in many systems no tray vents at all are used.
Importantly, none of the prior art technologies paid any attention to the cooling efficiencies of the various configurations. In particular, no attention was paid to integrating the tray vents with vents in the produce containers (in those cases where the produce containers actually had vents). No attention was given to the idea of specifically sized and shaped containers or to placed in the containers and trays in a specific alignment to maximize produce cooling or to maximize pallet content.
In another prior art example, a “six-down” pallet loading configuration is used. Specifically, using current basket technology, a pallet loading configuration under the six-down system comprises six (6) trays per layer on the pallet. In one implementation eight (8) one pound baskets are loaded per tray, this means that forty eight pounds of fruit can be packed per layer on a standard 40 inch by 48 inch pallet. As currently employed, the current six down configuration suffers from sub-optimal tray and container packing. Neither the trays nor the containers shipped therein are fitted together properly. Thus, the package does not fully utilize the surface area of a forty by forty eight inch pallet. Therefore, current use packages and trays under-utilize the pallet. This of course forms a further inefficiency of shipping. This leads to higher costs. This same problem is found to exist across all size ranges for produces shipping trays and containers.
What is needed is a packaging method and cooling configuration that can fully take advantage of the packing space available on a standard 40″×48″ pallet and provide improved cooling performance over the prior art. Moreover, there is a need for an improved berry packing system which will significantly reduce the cooling time and cooling expense for the fruit contained in the baskets. To make such an improved system feasible, it must interface with commonly used and preferred facilities and apparatus (e.g., the previously discussed forty by forty eight inch pallets in current use in the grocery industry).
Accordingly, what is needed is a packaging configuration and approach that provides maximum cooling performance and packing density.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, an improved system and method for packaging, transporting, storing, and cooling produce are disclosed.
In general, the present invention is directed toward methods and produce packaging configurations that increase cooling rates for harvested produce and increase per pallet produce volume.
One embodiment of the invention comprises a method for produce cooling involving arranging a plurality of produce packaging containers in cooling trays so that ventilation slots of the packaging containers are in alignment with ventilation openings of the cooling trays. The containers are further arranged so that ventilation slots of the packaging containers are also in alignment with ventilation slots of other packaging containers. This arrangement enables airflow to pass into the tray and through each of the containers and back out through a ventilation opening at an opposite end of the tray. The trays are further arranged on a pallet in a three by three layer of trays placed so that ventilation openings of the cooling trays are directly adjacent to and in alignment with ventilation openings of at least one other cooling tray. Air flow is passed into the ventilation openings of the trays on a first side of the pallet and through each of the containers and trays and out of the ventilation openings of the trays on a second side of the pallet opposite the first side.
In another system embodiment the invention a plurality of produce packaging containers is arranged in a plurality of cooling trays so that ventilation slots of the packaging containers are in alignment with ventilation openings of the cooling trays. The ventilation slots of the packaging containers are further in alignment with ventilation slots of other packaging containers. Said arrangement enabling airflow to pass through the ventilation openings and through each of the containers and out of the cooling tray through a ventilation opening at an opposite end of the tray. The trays arranged on a pallet in a three by three layer of trays placed so that ventilation openings of the cooling trays are directly adjacent to and in alignment with ventilation openings of other cooling trays.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description and accompanying drawings which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
The following detailed description will be more readily understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
It is to be understood that in the drawings like reference numerals designate like structural elements. Also, it is understood that the depictions in the Figures are not necessarily to scale.
The present invention has been particularly shown and described with respect to certain embodiments and specific features thereof. The embodiments set forth hereinbelow are to be taken as illustrative rather than limiting. It should be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes and modifications in form and detail may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Generally, the principles of the invention encompass packaging and cooling methods and systems designed to improve cooling efficiencies, reduce damage to the contents of containers, and increase product packing density. A system of the present invention incorporates baskets loaded into trays and trays loaded in preferred configurations on a pallet. The trays are loaded with baskets arranged in the tray so that ventilation slots and/or channels of the baskets are aligned with tray ventilation openings. Nine (9) trays are loaded onto a standard pallet in a 3 by 3 configuration. Additionally, the trays are arranged so that the tray ventilation openings are in alignment with ventilation openings of other trays of the same layer. This 3 by 3 layer of trays comprises a so-called “nine-down” configuration. As will be discussed below, his configuration has some surprising cooling advantageous standard packaging configurations.
Importantly, the closed lid 12 now defines a ventilation slot 15 between the lid 12 and basket body 11 enabling a cooling airflow to enter the container 20. The airflow exits through a matching ventilation slot (no shown in this view) at the opposite of the container 20. These features are well described in previously issued U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,738,890; 6,007,854; 6,074,676; and 6,962,263 which are hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes. The point being that variously shaped and sized ventilation slots are positioned at either end of the container to enhance cooling flow. The applicants believe that elongate horizontal slots 15 provide the best cooling results. In order to further enhance cooling the depicted embodiment includes an arched bottom 16 that defines a ventilation channel 16a under the container 20. Additionally, more than one channel can be formed under a side of the container. Moreover, arched bottoms can be formed in an adjacent wall 17 of the container to facilitate ventilating cross flow. Such issues are addressed in greater detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,962,263 which was previously incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Also, the depicted embodiment is shown with a ventilation slot 14 that passes through the hinge 13. This vent slot 14 enables directional ventilation flow through the top portion of the container. In some embodiments, the hinge vent slot 14 is positioned across from another ventilation slot on the opposite side of the container (not shown). This flow is transverse to the flow enabled by slot 15. In a related embodiment, vent slot 14 can comprise several vents through the hinge which still accomplishing the purposes of the invention. Alternatively, the slot ventilation need not be used at all.
When these containers are used with a typical non-inventive tray certain shortcomings become readily apparent. Cooling efficiencies are low and packing densities are lower.
The inventors have conceived of a system and packaging method that enables high packing density and superior cooling performance. Such a system incorporates a specially designed family of produce containers (“clamshells”) having particularly positioned and shaped ventilation slots optionally coupled with particularly positioned and shaped ventilation channels. The system further includes packaging trays for holding the containers. The trays being arranged of a particular size and having advantageously shaped and positioned ventilation openings. The one of the features of the system is that the containers and trays are configured so that when the containers are loaded into a tray, the tray vents and container vents (and channels) are in substantial alignment with each other. In some embodiments the vents and openings can be of about the same size as each other. This maximizes cooling effect on the contents of the containers by insuring that the majority of the cooling flow passing into tray openings passes into the containers through the container ventilation slots or through the ventilation channels created.
The depicted baskets 42 can be formed of a number of different materials, however, clear plastic container is preferred. The depicted embodiment is a vacuum formed one piece plastic structure with hinged lid. The inventors point out that the principles of the present invention are equally applicable to alternative materials and manufacturing technologies. In one embodiment of the present invention, the basket is formed of Kodapak® PET Copolyester 9921, available from Eastman Kodak. Alternative materials include, but are not limited to various polymeric and monomeric plastics including but not limited to styrenes, polyethylenes including HDPE and LPDE, polyesters and polyurethanes; metals and foils thereof; paper products including chipboard, pressboard, and flakeboard; wood and combinations of the foregoing. Alternative manufacturing technologies include, but are again not limited to thermocasting; casting, including die-casting; thermosetting; extrusion; sintering; lamination; the use of built-up structures and other processes well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Commonly, the lid is secured to the basket body using a latch mechanism. Numerous latching mechanisms can be employed to include, but are specifically not limited to, edge catches, button catches, snaps, hook-and-loop closures, and other closure methodologies well-known to those having ordinary skill in the art. Moreover, the term “latch” as used herein may further comprise alternative lid closure methodologies known to those having ordinary skill in the art including shrinkwrap banding the lid to the body, and the use of elastic bands or adhesive tapes to perform this latching function.
With continued reference to
The inventors point out that while some embodiments make use of lower ventilation openings 43 that are in alignment with the ventilation channels 44 and upper ventilation openings 45 are provided to enable air to flow into and through the containers 42, other embodiments can be employed using trays having only upper ventilation openings or only lower ventilation openings 43 depending on the need, requirements, and desires of the end user.
While the preceding discussion regarding a first preferred embodiment has centered on a one piece basket incorporating the basket body and lid joined by a hinge, it will be immediately apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that the principles of the present invention may with equal facility be embodied in a two piece implementation utilizing a separate body and lid. This embodiment is specifically contemplated by the teachings of the present invention.
Continued research into produce cooling has shown that some produce type/quantity combinations require different velocities of cooling air to achieve optimal cooling. This can be attained by altering the size of slots 42v. For example, in some implementations, the vertical extent of slot 42v can be substantially increased upwardly or downwardly from the embodiment shown in
The inventors point out that the embodiments can be formed of cut and folded corrugated cardboard formed in a manner well known to those of skill in the art. One such corrugated cardboard is Georgia-Pacific USP120-USP 85-USP 120, although any number of packaging materials well known to those of ordinary skill in the art could, with equal facility, be used. Such alternative materials include, but are not limited to various cardboards, pressboards, flakeboards, fiberboards, plastics, metals and metal foils. Alternatively or additionally, tray embodiments using additives, coatings, and/or liners are contemplated by the inventors. For example, wax treated papers, or plastic coated trays can be used and are well within the contemplated inventive aspects of the invention. In some embodiments of a tray, it may further be advantageous to incorporate a gluing, adhesive or fastening step in fabrication of the tray, again in accordance with generally accepted practices in container design and fabrication.
When smaller sized trays are employed with the present invention, a lighter grade of corrugated board can be used for their manufacture than are trays required to support the greater weight and greater area of larger baskets. This lighter weight not only minimizes shipping costs, but can significantly reduce packaging costs for the shipper, again lowering consumer costs. The principles of the present invention may be implemented using alternative tray materials including, but are not limited to various polymeric and monomeric plastics again including but not limited to styrenes, polyethylenes including HDPE and LPDE, polyesters and polyurethanes; metals and foils thereof; paper products including chipboard, pressboard, and flakeboard; wood; wire; and combinations of the foregoing.
Additionally, basket embodiments have been previously discussed that enable bidirectional cooling. Example embodiments are depicted in
Having reference now to
In contrast, in one embodiment of the present invention the baskets are configured to receive one pound of strawberries and are sized at approximately 6⅜″×5″×¾ high, when closed. The associated tray of the present invention is sized at approximately 16″×13¼″. This size enhances the volume of fruit containable for the footprint of a standard pallet. Moreover, this means that nine such trays can be loaded as a layer on the previously described pallet, for a total of 54 pounds of fruit per layer. This translates into 972 lbs per pallet versus 864 lbs per pallet for the prior art packing methods. This translates into a 12.5 percent increase in fruit volume per pallet. Since fees are charged on a per pallet basis, the merchant is not paying for wasted shipping volume and his shipping costs are thereby reduced, which can result in further savings to the consumer.
In another embodiment, the one pound of strawberries are arranged in an associated tray of the present invention that is sized and configured to accommodate two layers of baskets for each tray. Thus, each tray contains twelve (12) baskets. This size maximizes the footprint on a standard pallet. Again, nine such trays can be loaded as a layer on the previously described pallet. This can facilitate a loading of 1080 baskets per pallet and still maintain a 75″ height limit. This translates into a 25 percent increase in fruit volume per pallet. Since fees are charged on a per pallet basis, the merchant is not paying for wasted shipping volume and his shipping costs are thereby reduced, which can result in further savings to the consumer. In one representative example, the freight saved for California strawberry production alone (about 135 million trays of strawberries) could be as high as $65 million, including gas consumption.
With continuing reference to
The inventors point out that good temperature management involves rapid cooling and maintenance of low fruit temperature. In fact, this has been shown to be the single most important factor in fruit deterioration. This is especially the case for delicate fruit like strawberries, etc. Quick cooling and keeping the pulp temperature low maximize the postharvest life of the fruit.
It is important to cool the fruit as soon as possible after harvesting in order to maintain a maximum post harvest life. Removing the post harvest “field heat” as quickly as possible has proven to be a difficult yet critically important factor in fruit longevity. Additionally, quick cooling reduces produce moisture loss, inhibits the growth and spread of microorganisms, and increases the fruits robustness when subject to bruising and other injuries.
As is known to those having ordinary skill in the art many factors impact berry cooling rate. And it has been determined that keeping berry temperatures near 34° F. (1° C.) is an important factor in berry longevity. An increase of temperature of 10° C. (i.e., from 34° F. to 50° F.) results in a rate of deterioration that is 2-4 times greater than that of berries kept at 34° F. For every hour that a berry is exposed to room temperature, the shelf life is reduced by one day. Accordingly, berries maintained at the higher temperature (10° C.) have a life expectancy of one quarter of cooler berries. However, by quickly cooling the berries using pre-cooling and proper storage the shelf life of strawberries can be extended beyond one week.
Extensive testing of the inventive “nine-down” system as compared to competitive five-down and six down systems has revealed some surprising cooling advantages.
The aforementioned advantages are further magnified by the increased packaging densities possible with the inventive “nine-down” system. As described above, the standard pallet is confined to 864 pounds of fruit per pallet versus 1080 pounds (or 972 lbs. depending on configuration) per pallet for the inventive system. This of can add a further 25% to the value of each pallet, which can result in a further $216.00 in increased economic value per pallet. Moreover, when coupled with the advantages of the smooth wall baskets (which lead to less bruising and loss of fruit) a further 7% reduction in fruit damage losses is enjoyed. Thus, the system and its unique packing arrangement enables a substantial and unexpected increase in the amount of salable fruit provided to the end user. This results in a substantial savings to the merchant and end user.
Once the trays are loaded onto a pallet in a “nine-down” layer. Several identically orient 3 by 3 layers of trays are stacked on top to fill out each pallet. These pallets are then loaded into a cooler and refrigerated to the desired temperature (usually near 32° F.) where they remain till shipped.
The preceding discussion of an embodiment of the present invention has focused on one specific berry package design. It will be immediately obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art that the principles set forth herein are also applicable to a wide range of produce package sizes and utilizations. By way of illustration but not limitation, the present invention specifically contemplates the forming of 1 pint (also sometimes referred to as 8.8 oz., 8 oz., or 250 g.) and ½ pint (also sometimes referred to as 6 oz. or 125 g.) berry baskets, as well as a vast array of different sized baskets configured to receive therein specific produce shapes, types and counts. An example of the latter is the “long stem pack” used in the berry industry for shipping specific package counts of large, premium berries. Furthermore, while the discussion of the principles set forth herein has centered on packages for the berry industry, it is recognized that these principles may be applied with equal facility to the packaging of a broad range of materials including other foodstuffs or any item which would benefit from the advantages set forth herein. Such applications are specifically contemplated. These principles include the use of a family of trays, having fixed “footprints” or lengths and widths, but with whose heights are varied to accommodate baskets having different heights and/or counts per tray. By maintaining the footprint at a constant value, the advantages of minimizing lateral movement between individual trays and between layers of trays are attained because the trays of one layer interlock with the layer of trays above or below it. This is true even where adjacent tray layers contain significantly differing sizes of baskets, holding the same or different produce items.
Where the tray is designed to receive one pound strawberry baskets as previously discussed, the height of the tray is approximately 3¾ inches. Where other berries, or indeed other produce products are shipped, the length and width of the tray do not change, but remain at the previously defined optimal size. Changes in tray volume necessary to accommodate differing numbers and volumes of baskets are accommodated by altering the height of the tray. In similar fashion, baskets designed for use in the present system are sized to fit within the previously discussed tray. In this manner, baskets suitable for substantially any size basket designed for consumer use, as well as many baskets sized for the food service industry, may be accommodated by the present invention. This presents the previously described advantage of enabling the shipment of a mixed pallet of differing produce by loading trays optimized for each type of produce onto separate, compatible layers.
The present invention has been particularly shown and described with respect to certain preferred embodiments and features thereof. However, it should be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes and modifications in form and detail may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the inventions as set forth in the appended claims. In particular, the use of alternative basket forming technologies, tray forming technologies, basket and tray materials and specifications, basket shapes and sizes to conform to differing produce requirements, and vent configurations are all contemplated by the principles of the present invention.
The present invention has been particularly shown and described with respect to certain preferred embodiments and specific features thereof. However, it should be noted that the above-described embodiments are intended to describe the principles of the invention, not limit its scope. Therefore, as is readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, various changes and modifications in form and detail may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims. Other embodiments and variations to the depicted embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art and may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims. Although only a few specific configurations are expressly disclosed herein, it should be appreciated by anyone having ordinary skill in the art that, using the teachings disclosed herein, many different packaging configurations can be implemented and still fall within the scope of the claims. Further, reference in the claims to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly stated, but rather, “one or more”. Furthermore, the embodiments illustratively disclosed herein can be practiced without any element which is not specifically disclosed herein.
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/017,893, filed Dec. 12, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,100,788 entitled: “Method And Apparatus For Packing And Bi-Directional Cooling Of Produce” which is in turn a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/590,631, filed Jun. 8, 2000, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/060,453 filed Apr. 14, 1998 and allowed as U.S. Pat. No. 6,074,676, issued on Jun. 13, 2000, and which is a continuation-in-part applications from Ser. No. 08/591,000, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,738,890 issued on Apr. 14, 1998 (and filed on Jan. 24, 1996). This application hereby claims priority from all of the foregoing issued patents and patent applications. Priority of U.S. provisional application No. 60/791,678 filed on Apr. 12, 2006 is claimed under 35 U.S.C. §119(e).
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1800346 | Slagel | Apr 1931 | A |
| 1953765 | McCluney | Apr 1934 | A |
| 2652335 | Conti | Sep 1953 | A |
| 2660529 | Bloom | Nov 1953 | A |
| 2684907 | Brunsing | Jul 1954 | A |
| 2739734 | Pugh | Mar 1956 | A |
| 2801742 | Farrell | Aug 1957 | A |
| 2936094 | Smith | May 1960 | A |
| 2936239 | Rendall | May 1960 | A |
| 3037658 | Schray et al. | Jun 1962 | A |
| 3042247 | Bonnet | Jul 1962 | A |
| 3253762 | Gaunt | May 1966 | A |
| 3613938 | Westcott | Oct 1971 | A |
| 3651977 | Morgan | Mar 1972 | A |
| 3741815 | Peterson | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3794090 | Commisso | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3912118 | Bird | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3937389 | Wind | Feb 1976 | A |
| 4206845 | Christian | Jun 1980 | A |
| D256097 | Amberg | Jul 1980 | S |
| 4390113 | Bird | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4478344 | Rehrig | Oct 1984 | A |
| D276216 | Michaud | Nov 1984 | S |
| 4529088 | Quong | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4570818 | Borst et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4597503 | Lates | Jul 1986 | A |
| 4618069 | Quong | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4664281 | Falk et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4704510 | Matsui | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4741452 | Holzkopf | May 1988 | A |
| 4767008 | Warnecke et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4771934 | Kalmanides | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4819822 | Box | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4844263 | Hadtke | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4859822 | Ragusa et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4883195 | Ott et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4974738 | Kidd et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| D315100 | Sheehan | Mar 1991 | S |
| 5069344 | Dehart | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5076459 | DeHart | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5191994 | Stauble | Mar 1993 | A |
| D339744 | Seppala | Sep 1993 | S |
| 5265749 | Zutler | Nov 1993 | A |
| D343576 | Krupa | Jan 1994 | S |
| D345894 | Krupa | Apr 1994 | S |
| 5312034 | Nakagawa et al. | May 1994 | A |
| D348608 | Wyslotsky | Jul 1994 | S |
| 5339973 | Edwards et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| D354436 | Krupa | Jan 1995 | S |
| 5423453 | Fritz | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429296 | Southwell et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| D361035 | Krupa | Aug 1995 | S |
| D361036 | Krupa | Aug 1995 | S |
| D363022 | Krupa et al. | Oct 1995 | S |
| 5456379 | Krupa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| D363879 | Krupa et al. | Nov 1995 | S |
| 5465901 | Paine, Jr. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5515993 | McManus | May 1996 | A |
| 5516034 | Jensen et al. | May 1996 | A |
| D376314 | Krupa | Dec 1996 | S |
| D378192 | Krupa et al. | Feb 1997 | S |
| D379300 | Krupa et al. | May 1997 | S |
| D380381 | Krupa et al. | Jul 1997 | S |
| D382795 | Abayhan et al. | Aug 1997 | S |
| D385784 | Krupa et al. | Nov 1997 | S |
| 5686127 | Stockley, III et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| D393204 | Goins et al. | Apr 1998 | S |
| 5738890 | Cadiente et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5803303 | Timm et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5833116 | Guillin | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5855277 | Apps et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| D409485 | Christy, Jr. | May 1999 | S |
| 5947321 | Vadney | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6007854 | Cadiente et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6074676 | Cadiente et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6257401 | Mangla et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| D448288 | Zettle et al. | Sep 2001 | S |
| 6644494 | Hayes et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6962263 | Cadiente et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7007802 | Moorman et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
| 7703628 | Cadiente et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7832585 | Sambrailo | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 20030077363 | Cadiente | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030198714 | Cadiente et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20070056980 | Sambrailo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2340852 | Sep 2001 | CA |
| 1452-98 | Jun 1998 | CL |
| 2205-03 | Oct 2003 | CL |
| 1745-06 | Jul 2006 | CL |
| 857860 | Dec 1952 | DE |
| 0765819 | Apr 1997 | EP |
| 1074164 | Jun 1967 | GB |
| 2160510 | Dec 1985 | GB |
| 2200340 | Aug 1988 | GB |
| PA04002335 | Sep 2005 | MX |
| WO 0020286 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070007293 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60791678 | Apr 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09060453 | Apr 1998 | US |
| Child | 09590631 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10017893 | Dec 2001 | US |
| Child | 11474096 | US | |
| Parent | 09590631 | Jun 2000 | US |
| Child | 10017893 | US | |
| Parent | 08591000 | Jan 1996 | US |
| Child | 09060453 | US |
