Coordinated recalibration of high bandwidth memories in a multiprocessor computer

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6874102
  • Patent Number
    6,874,102
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 5, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 29, 2005
    19 years ago
Abstract
Methods and apparatus for implementing high-bandwidth memory subsystems in a multiprocessor computing environment. Each component in the memory subsystem has a recalibration procedure. The computer provides a low-frequency clock signal with a period substantially equal to the duration between recalibration cycles of the components of the memory subsystem. Transitions in the low-frequency clock signal initiate a deterministically-determined delay. Lapse of the delay in turn triggers the recalibration of the components of the memory subsystem, ensuring synchronous recalibration. Synchronizing the recalibration procedures minimizes the unavailability of the memory subsystems, consequently reducing voting errors between CPUs.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to implementing support for high-bandwidth random-access memory in a fault-tolerant computer. In particular, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for supporting high-bandwidth memory in a synchronized multiprocessor computing environment.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a typical prior art computer includes a central processing unit (CPU) 12, a random-access memory (RAM) 20, and a mass storage device 32 connected by a system bus 18 that passes data and messages between components connected to the system bus 18. Computer performance can be increased, for example, by increasing the clock speed at which the CPU 12 operates. However, the increase in performance from an increase in clock speed is limited by the rate at which the system bus 18 conveys data between the components of computer 10.


Typically, system bus 18 has a lower clock rate than CPU 12. Thus, computer performance may also be increased by increasing the clock speed of the bus 18, thereby increasing the throughput of communications carried by the bus 18. One implementation of a high-bandwidth integrated memory subsystem using a bus with a fast clock is the RAMBUS specification from RAMBUS, Inc. of Los Altos, Calif. The RAMBUS system uses a 400 MHz clock with triggered on the rising and falling edges of the clock signal. Therefore, one line in a RAMBUS channel has a bandwidth of 800 Mb/s.



FIG. 2 depicts one embodiment of the RAMBUS integrated memory subsystem. The memory system typically includes a direct RAMBUS controller 50 and at least one RAMBUS Integrated Memory Module (RDRAM) 52 connected by direct RAMBUS channels 54 ending in a channel terminator 56. The controller 50 operates as a bus master for the memory subsystem: it generates requests, controls the flow of data, and keeps track of RDRAM refresh and states. The channel 54 is composed of thirty individual lines triggered on both edges of a 400 MHz clock signal, resulting in a 2.4 Gb/s throughput. The terminator 56 is a matched impedance absorbing any signals reaching the end of the channel 54 without any reflections.


In order to operate at this level of throughput, the operation of components in the RAMBUS subsystem is tightly monitored and periodically adjusted to maintain performance within predetermined tolerances. During these periodic recalibration events, the memory subsystem is not available for memory read or write transactions. In a single processor or asynchronous multiprocessor computer, this recalibration results in a short delay when the memory subsystem is unavailable. However, unsynchronized recalibration events can cause errors in a synchronized multiprocessor computing environment.


Certain prior art computer systems achieve fault tolerance through multiply-redundant system components. Each computer has multiple CPUs, each CPU having its own memory subsystem and other support electronics. The CPUs are cycle-synchronized to run identical copies of the same program simultaneously. Additional logic monitors the output of each CPU at a given point in time and, if the outputs disagree, restarts or initiates a diagnostic sequence to correct or identify the problem. If each CPU is equipped with a high-bandwidth memory subsystem that requires periodic recalibration, then the output of each individual CPU will appear to stall during a recalibration period. If recalibration among multiple memory subsystems is uncoordinated, then during recalibration events the outputs of the CPUs may vary, inducing monitor logic to halt or restart the system. Therefore, it is desirable to implement high-bandwidth memory in a lockstepped multiprocessor computing environment while avoiding delay-induced voter miscompares and other problems.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the problem of implementing high-bandwidth memory in a multiprocessor computing environment. One object of the invention is to provide methods for synchronized recalibration among multiple hardware devices connected to a memory bus in a fault-tolerant computer. Yet another object of the invention is to provide a fault-tolerant computer with multiple integrated memory subsystems with synchronized memory recalibration.


In one aspect, the present invention is a method for providing synchronized recalibration of hardware devices on a memory bus in a fault-tolerant computing environment. A computer is provided with at least two central processing units (CPUs) and at least two hardware devices, each hardware device associated with one CPU and having a recalibration procedure with a non-zero duration. A deterministically-computed delay is used to simultaneously initiate recalibration among the hardware devices. In one embodiment, a maintenance clock signal is generated with a period substantially equal to the duration between recalibration cycles of the components of the memory subsystem and is used to trigger the deterministically-computed delay. In another embodiment, the initiation of the recalibration procedure occurs when a change in the maintenance clock signal changes the state of a reset signal, in turn initiating a deterministically-computed delay whose lapse initiates the recalibration procedure. In one embodiment, the change in the maintenance clock signal is an edge transition. In another embodiment, the change in the reset signal is a deassertion of the reset signal. In still another embodiment, the change in the reset signal is an assertion of the reset signal. In yet another embodiment, the deterministically-computed delay is an integer multiple of a system clock signal with a system clock period. In another embodiment, the hardware devices are RAMBUS memory controller hubs (MCH). In yet another embodiment, the hardware devices are RAMBUS memory repeater hubs (MRH).


In another aspect, the present invention is a fault tolerant computer with synchronized memory recalibration. The computer includes at least two CPUs in synchronized operation and at least two hardware devices having recalibration procedures, each hardware device connected to a CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure. The computer also includes a synchronizer connected to the hardware devices and operating to synchronize the execution of the recalibration procedures among hardware devices. In one embodiment, the hardware devices are MCHs. In another embodiment, the hardware devices are MRHs. In yet another embodiment, the computer includes a clock generator connected to the synchronizer, receiving a system clock signal and generating a maintenance clock signal to initiate the recalibration procedure in the hardware devices. In still another embodiment, the computer includes a temperature sensor connected to the synchronizer and thermally connected to the hardware devices, measuring their temperature. In yet another embodiment, the computer includes a current sensor connected to the synchronizer and electrically connected to the hardware devices, measuring the output current from the hardware devices.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other advantages of the invention may be more clearly understood with reference to the specification and the drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a prior art computer;



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a prior art RAMBUS integrated memory subsystem;



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a multiprocessor computer in accord with the present invention;



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the synchronizer 76 of FIG. 3; and



FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a method for synchronized recalibration in accord with the present invention.





In the drawings, like reference characters generally refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In brief overview, Applicants' invention provides methods and apparatus for implementing high-bandwidth memory subsystems in a multiprocessor computing environment. Each component in the memory subsystem has a recalibration procedure. The computer provides a low-frequency clock signal with a period approximately equal to the duration between recalibration cycles of the components of the memory subsystem. Transitions in the low-frequency clock signal initiate a deterministically-determined delay. Lapse of the delay in turn triggers the recalibration of the components of the memory subsystem, ensuring synchronous recalibration. Synchronizing the recalibration events minimizes the unavailability of the memory subsystems, consequently reducing voting errors between synchronized CPUs.


Although the present invention is discussed in terms of RAMBUS technologies, it is to be understood that the present invention encompasses embodiments using other high-bandwidth memory subsystems whose components require recalibration, including but not limited to double data rate synchronous dynamic RAM (DDRSDRAM).


Referring to FIG. 3, a computer in accord with the present invention includes multiple CPUs 12. In a preferred embodiment, the computer uses four CPUs 12 based on the IA-64 CPU architecture from INTEL CORPORATION of Santa Clara, Calif. The CPUs 12 operate in synchronous lockstep. That is, at a given point in time every CPU 12 executes the same instruction as every other CPU 12. Each CPU 12 is associated with its own integrated memory subsystem. For ease of illustration, FIG. 3 depicts two CPUs 12, each associated with its own high-bandwidth memory subsystem requiring periodic recalibration. It is to be understood that the preferred embodiment of the invention is directed to four CPUs, although in principle the present invention extends to any multiprocessor computing environment.


The CPUs 12 are each connected to their own memory controller hub (MCH) 50 via a system bus 18. The MCH 50 operates as a bus master for the memory subsystem, generating requests, controlling the flow of data, and keeping track of RDRAM refresh and states. In a preferred embodiment, the MCH 50 is an 82840 Memory Controller Hub from INTEL CORPORATION of Santa Clara, Calif. The 82840 MCH directly supports dual channels of Direct RAMBUS memory using RAMBUS signaling level technologies. In this configuration, the MCH 50 does not require a memory repeater hub (MRH) 70. In another embodiment, the computer in accord with the present invention uses DDR-SDRAM. In this case, the MCH 50 requires a MRH 70 to implement high-bandwidth memory.


The 82840 MCH provides a memory bandwidth of 3.2 Gb/sec. To achieve this data rate, it is necessary to maintain RAMBUS channel parameters, such as device output current and temperature, within certain predetermined ranges. For example, in embodiments using the MRH 70, the MRH 70 requires periodic recalibration to maintain its temperature within a predetermined operating range. Periodically the temperature of the MRH 70 is measured and the slew rate of the output drivers of the MRH 70 are adjusted to correct any temperature drift. In one embodiment using the Intel 840 chipset, this recalibration procedure takes 350 nanoseconds, making the memory subsystem unavailable for read and write transactions during this period.


Since each recalibration period renders a memory subsystem unavailable for use, a CPU 12 can appear to halt operation while it waits for its memory subsystem to finish recalibration. If the CPUs of the computer are designed to operate in lockstep, then unsynchronized recalibrations among memory subsystems will cause individual processors to periodically stall, resulting in different output streams among the CPUs. If additional logic is present to compare the CPU outputs to facilitate error detection, then unsynchronized recalibrations will incorrectly appear as errors, although in principle the system may be operating correctly.


This problem is addressed by the addition of a synchronizer 76 to generate signals to initiate the recalibration of the memory subsystem components in a controlled fashion. The synchronizer 76 receives a low-frequency maintenance clock signal. The period of the maintenance clock signal is substantially equal to the duration between recalibration cycles of the components of the integrated memory subsystem. In some embodiments, the maintenance clock signal has a period that is an integer multiple of a higher-frequency system clock signal.


Transitions in the maintenance clock signal initiate a predetermined deterministically-computed delay. Lapse of that delay in turn initiates the assertion of a reset signal routed to the MCH 50 and in turn to the CPUs 12, initiating a coordinated recalibration among the components of the integrated memory subsystems. Coordinated memory recalibration ensures that the integrated memory subsystems are simultaneously unavailable for the same amount of time, minimizing the disruption in a synchronous multiprocessor computing environment.



FIG. 4 depicts one embodiment of the synchronizer 76 of FIG. 3. The RESET signal initiates the recalibration process in the components of the integrated memory subsystems. By driving flip flops 82 and 84 with the low-frequency maintenance clock signal, the changes in state in the RESET signal are synchronized to changes in state in the maintenance clock signal. Similarly, driving flip flop 86 with the system clock ensures that changes in state in the RESET signal are synchronized to changes in state in the system clock signal. Together, these multiple flip flop stages ensure that changes in state in the RESET signal are synchronized with changes in state in both the system clock and maintenance clock signals.


The RESET signal is asserted under two conditions. First, the RESET signal is asserted in the event of power-on or a system restart after the passage of a predetermined delay determined by timer 90. Second, the RESET signal is asserted upon the application of an asserted signal to the line to the control interface 80. The control interface line may be asserted by hardware or software to initiate a synchronized recalibration of the components of the integrated memory subsystems. In one embodiment, an individual hardware device initiates a recalibration event in all of the integrated memory subsystems by placing a signal on this line.



FIG. 5 depicts a flowchart describing the method used to align the memory maintenance cycles between memory subsystems at system start-up. At power up, the first CPU is brought on line (Step 10). The RESET signal is asserted (Step 12), and after the passage of a deterministic delay, the first memory maintenance cycle in the first integrated memory subsystem occurs (Step 14). The next CPU is brought online (Step 16), but the RESET signal for the next CPU is asserted (Step 22) only if the RESET signals between the CPUs are synchronized. In a preferred embodiment, the RESET signals are synchronized by delaying assertion until the passage of an integer multiple of system clock cycles since the assertion of the previous RESET signal. In another embodiment, the same result is achieved by delaying assertion until the lapse of an integer multiple of lower frequency maintenance clock cycles.


After the next RESET signal is asserted (Step 22), a deterministic delay passes before the recalibration cycle in the next memory subsystem is initiated (Step 24). At this point, the recalibration cycles between the memory subsystems have been synchronized. The process repeats itself for the remaining CPUs (Step 26) before normal system operation ensues (Step 28). In normal operation, recalibration among memory subsystems continues to operate synchronously.


Many alterations and modifications may be made by those having ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, it must be expressly understood that the illustrated embodiment has been shown only for the purposes of example and should not be taken as limiting the invention, which is defined by the following claims. The following claims are thus to be read as not only literally including what is set forth by the claims but also to include all equivalent elements for performing substantially the same function in substantially the same way to obtain substantially the same result, even though not identical in other respects to what is shown and described in the above illustrations.

Claims
  • 1. A method for providing synchronized recalibration of hardware devices in electrical communication with a memory bus in a fault-tolerant computing environment, said method comprising the steps: (a) providing a computer having a first and second synchronized central processing units (CPUs) and first and second hardware devices having a recalibration procedure, wherein said first hardware device is associated with said first CPU and said second hardware device is associated with said second CPU; (b) initiating said recalibration procedure in said first and second hardware devices after the passage of a deterministically-computed delay; and (c) generating a maintenance clock signal with a period substantially equal to the duration between iterations of said recalibration procedures, wherein the maintenance clock signal is used to initiate the deterministically-computed delay of step (b).
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein step (b) comprises the steps: (b-a) changing the state of a reset signal upon the occurrence of a change in said maintenance clock signal; and (b-b) initiating said recalibration procedure in said first and second hardware devices after the passage of a deterministically-computed delay triggered by the change in state of said reset signal.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein said change in said maintenance clock signal is an edge transition.
  • 4. The method of claim 2 wherein changing the state of the reset signal comprises the step of deasserting the reset signal.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein changing the state of the reset signal comprises the step of asserting the reset signal.
  • 6. A method for providing synchronized recalibration of hardware devices in electrical communication with a memory bus in a fault-tolerant computing environment, said method comprising the steps: (a) providing a computer having a first and second synchronized central processing units (CPUs) and first and second hardware devices having a recalibration procedure, wherein said first hardware device is associated with said first CPU and said second hardware device is associated with said second CPU; (b) initiating said recalibration procedure in said first and second hardware devices after the passage of a deterministically-computed delay; and (c) generating a system clock having a system clock period, wherein said deterministically-computed delay is an integer multiple of said system clock period.
  • 7. A method for providing synchronized recalibration of hardware devices in electrical communication with a memory bus in a fault-tolerant computing environment, said method comprising the steps: (a) providing a computer having a first and second synchronized central processing units (CPUs) and first and second hardware devices having a recalibration procedure, wherein said first hardware device is a first memory device connected to said first CPU through the memory bus and said second hardware device is a second memory device connected to said second CPU through the memory bust; and (b) initiating said recalibration procedure in said first and second hardware devices after the passage of a deterministically-computed delay, wherein step (a) further comprises providing hardware devices that are RAMBUS memory controller hubs (MCH).
  • 8. A method for providing synchronized recalibration of hardware devices in electrical communication with a memory bus in a fault-tolerant computing environment, said method comprising the steps: (a) providing a computer having a first and second synchronized central processing units (CPUs) and first and second hardware devices having a recalibration procedure, wherein said first hardware device is a first memory device connected to said first CPU through the memory bus and said second hardware device is a second memory device connected to said second CPU through the memory bus; and (b) initiating said recalibration procedure in said first and second hardware devices after the passage of a deterministically-computed delay, wherein step (a) further comprises providing hardware devices that are memory repeater hubs (MRH).
  • 9. A fault-tolerant computer with synchronized memory recalibration, comprising: a first central processing unit (CPU), a second CPU, in synchronized operation with said first CPU; a first hardware device, in electrical communication with said first CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure; a second hardware device, in electrical communication with said second CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure, wherein each of said first and second hardware devices is an integrated memory subsystem; and a synchronizer in electrical communication with said hardware devices, operating to synchronize the execution of the recalibration procedure in said first hardware device with the execution of the recalibration procedure in said second hardware device, wherein said hardware devices are RAMBUS memory controller hubs (MCH).
  • 10. A fault-tolerant computer with synchronized memory recalibration, comprising: a first central processing unit (CPU), a second CPU, in synchronized operation with said first CPU; a first hardware device, in electrical communication with said first CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure; a second hardware device, in electrical communication with said second CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure, wherein each of said first and second hardware devices is an integrated memory subsystem; and a synchronizer in electrical communication with said hardware devices, operating to synchronize the execution of the recalibration procedure in said first hardware device with the execution of the recalibration procedure in said second hardware device, wherein said hardware devices are memory repeater hubs (MRH).
  • 11. A fault-tolerant computer with synchronized memory recalibration, comprising: a first central processing unit (CPU), a second CPU, in synchronized operation with said first CPU; a first hardware device, in electrical communication with said first CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure; a second hardware device, in electrical communication with said second CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure; a synchronizer in electrical communication with said hardware devices, operating to synchronize the execution of the recalibration procedure in said first hardware device with the execution of the recalibration procedure in said second hardware device; and a clock generator in electrical communication with said synchronizer, receiving a system clock signal and generating a maintenance clock signal to initiate the recalibration procedure in said hardware devices.
  • 12. A fault-tolerant computer with synchronized memory recalibration, comprising: a first central processing unit (CPU), a second CPU, in synchronized operation with said first CPU; a first hardware device, in electrical communication with said first CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure; a second hardware device, in electrical communication with said second CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure; a synchronizer in electrical communication with said hardware devices, operating to synchronize the execution of the recalibration procedure in said first hardware device with the execution of the recalibration procedure in said second hardware device; and a temperature sensor in electrical communication with said synchronizer and thermally connected to first and second hardware devices, measuring the temperature of said hardware devices.
  • 13. A fault-tolerant computer with synchronized memory recalibration, comprising: a first central processing unit (CPU), a second CPU, in synchronized operation with said first CPU; a first hardware device, in electrical communication with said first CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure; a second hardware device, in electrical communication with said second CPU through a memory bus and having a recalibration procedure; a synchronizer in electrical communication with said hardware devices, operating to synchronize the execution of the recalibration procedure in said first hardware device with the execution of the recalibration procedure in said second hardware device; and a current sensor in electrical communication with said synchronizer and first and second hardware devices, measuring the output current of said hardware devices.
US Referenced Citations (156)
Number Name Date Kind
3460094 Pryor Aug 1969 A
3468241 Leslie et al. Sep 1969 A
3469239 Richmond et al. Sep 1969 A
3544973 Borck, Jr. et al. Dec 1970 A
3548382 Lichty et al. Dec 1970 A
3609704 Schurter Sep 1971 A
3641505 Artz et al. Feb 1972 A
3705388 Nishimoto Dec 1972 A
3710324 Cohen et al. Jan 1973 A
3736566 Anderson et al. May 1973 A
3795901 Boehm et al. Mar 1974 A
3805039 Stiffler Apr 1974 A
3893084 Kotok et al. Jul 1975 A
4015246 Hopkins, Jr. et al. Mar 1977 A
4040034 Belady et al. Aug 1977 A
4096572 Namimoto Jun 1978 A
4164787 Aranguren Aug 1979 A
4228496 Katzman et al. Oct 1980 A
4296463 Dalboussiere et al. Oct 1981 A
4356550 Katzman et al. Oct 1982 A
4365295 Katzman et al. Dec 1982 A
4366535 Cedolin et al. Dec 1982 A
4466098 Southard Aug 1984 A
4484273 Stiffler et al. Nov 1984 A
4493036 Boudreau et al. Jan 1985 A
4503499 Mason et al. Mar 1985 A
4574348 Scallon Mar 1986 A
4590554 Glazer et al. May 1986 A
4608631 Stiffler et al. Aug 1986 A
4608688 Hansen et al. Aug 1986 A
4637024 Dixon et al. Jan 1987 A
4672613 Foxworthy et al. Jun 1987 A
4674037 Funabashi et al. Jun 1987 A
4677546 Freeman et al. Jun 1987 A
4695975 Bedrij Sep 1987 A
4700292 Campanini Oct 1987 A
4716523 Burrus, Jr. et al. Dec 1987 A
4719568 Carrubba et al. Jan 1988 A
4774659 Smith et al. Sep 1988 A
4866604 Reid Sep 1989 A
4920540 Baty Apr 1990 A
4924427 Savage et al. May 1990 A
4942517 Cok Jul 1990 A
4942519 Nakayama Jul 1990 A
4965717 Cutts et al. Oct 1990 A
4993030 Krakauer et al. Feb 1991 A
5020024 Williams May 1991 A
5115490 Komuro et al. May 1992 A
5175855 Putnam et al. Dec 1992 A
5193162 Bordsen et al. Mar 1993 A
5193180 Hastings Mar 1993 A
5195040 Goldsmith Mar 1993 A
5231640 Hanson et al. Jul 1993 A
5276860 Fortier et al. Jan 1994 A
5280612 Lorie et al. Jan 1994 A
5280619 Wang Jan 1994 A
5283870 Joyce et al. Feb 1994 A
5295258 Jewett et al. Mar 1994 A
5317726 Horst May 1994 A
5321706 Holm et al. Jun 1994 A
5335334 Takahashi et al. Aug 1994 A
5357612 Alaiwan Oct 1994 A
5371885 Letwin Dec 1994 A
5386524 Lary et al. Jan 1995 A
5388242 Jewett Feb 1995 A
5404361 Casorso et al. Apr 1995 A
5423037 Hvasshovd Jun 1995 A
5423046 Nunnelley et al. Jun 1995 A
5426747 Weinreb et al. Jun 1995 A
5434997 Landry et al. Jul 1995 A
5440710 Richter et al. Aug 1995 A
5440727 Bhide et al. Aug 1995 A
5440732 Lomet et al. Aug 1995 A
5454091 Sites et al. Sep 1995 A
5463755 Dumarot et al. Oct 1995 A
5465328 Dievendorff et al. Nov 1995 A
5475860 Ellison et al. Dec 1995 A
5479648 Barbera et al. Dec 1995 A
5497476 Oldfield et al. Mar 1996 A
5504873 Martin et al. Apr 1996 A
5513314 Kandasamy et al. Apr 1996 A
5524212 Somani et al. Jun 1996 A
5550986 DuLac Aug 1996 A
5551020 Flax et al. Aug 1996 A
5557770 Bhide et al. Sep 1996 A
5555404 Torbjørnsen et al. Oct 1996 A
5566316 Fechner et al. Oct 1996 A
5568629 Gentry et al. Oct 1996 A
5581750 Haderle et al. Dec 1996 A
5584008 Shimada et al. Dec 1996 A
5584018 Kamiyama Dec 1996 A
5586253 Green et al. Dec 1996 A
5586310 Sharman Dec 1996 A
5606681 Smith et al. Feb 1997 A
5608901 Letwin Mar 1997 A
5619671 Bryant et al. Apr 1997 A
5627961 Sharman May 1997 A
5628023 Bryant et al. May 1997 A
5632031 Velissaropoulos et al. May 1997 A
5651139 Cripe et al. Jul 1997 A
5664172 Antoshenkov Sep 1997 A
5682513 Candelaria et al. Oct 1997 A
5687392 Radko Nov 1997 A
5721918 Nilsson et al. Feb 1998 A
5724581 Kozakura Mar 1998 A
5742792 Yanai et al. Apr 1998 A
5745913 Pattin et al. Apr 1998 A
5754821 Cripe et al. May 1998 A
5784699 McMahon et al. Jul 1998 A
5794035 Golub et al. Aug 1998 A
5815649 Utter et al. Sep 1998 A
5838894 Horst Nov 1998 A
5845060 Vrba et al. Dec 1998 A
5850632 Robertson Dec 1998 A
5860126 Mittal Jan 1999 A
5890003 Cutts et al. Mar 1999 A
5894560 Carmichael et al. Apr 1999 A
5918229 Davis et al. Jun 1999 A
5920876 Ungar et al. Jul 1999 A
5920898 Bolyn et al. Jul 1999 A
5933838 Lomet Aug 1999 A
5949972 Applegate Sep 1999 A
5953742 Williams Sep 1999 A
5956756 Khalidi Sep 1999 A
5959923 Matleson et al. Sep 1999 A
5960459 Thome et al. Sep 1999 A
5990914 Horan et al. Nov 1999 A
5996055 Woodman Nov 1999 A
6000007 Leung et al. Dec 1999 A
6012106 Schumann et al. Jan 2000 A
6012120 Duncan et al. Jan 2000 A
6016495 McKeehan et al. Jan 2000 A
6021456 Herdeg et al. Feb 2000 A
6026465 Mills et al. Feb 2000 A
6026475 Woodman Feb 2000 A
6047343 Olarig Apr 2000 A
6055617 Kingsbury Apr 2000 A
6065017 Barker May 2000 A
6067550 Lomet May 2000 A
6067608 Perry May 2000 A
6085200 Hill et al. Jul 2000 A
6085296 Karkhanis et al. Jul 2000 A
6098074 Cannon et al. Aug 2000 A
6105075 Ghaffari Aug 2000 A
6119128 Courter et al. Sep 2000 A
6119214 Dirks Sep 2000 A
6128711 Duncan et al. Oct 2000 A
6128713 Eisler. Oct 2000 A
6134638 Olarig et al. Oct 2000 A
6138198 Garnett et al. Oct 2000 A
6141722 Parsons Oct 2000 A
6141744 Wing So Oct 2000 A
6141769 Petivan et al. Oct 2000 A
6263452 Jewett et al. Jul 2001 B1
6687851 Somers et al. Feb 2004 B1
6757847 Farkash et al. Jun 2004 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
0 208 430 Jan 1987 EP
0 428 330 May 1991 EP
0 428 330 May 1991 EP
0 406 759 Sep 1991 EP
0 475 005 Nov 1995 EP
0 390 567 Sep 1999 EP
2 508 200 Dec 1982 FR
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20020124202 A1 Sep 2002 US