The invention generally relates to waveguide structures and, in particular, to on-chip high performance slow-wave coplanar waveguide structures, method of manufacture and design structures for integrated circuits.
In circuit design, passive components refer to components that are not capable of power gain such as, for example, capacitors, inductors, resistors, diodes, transmission lines and transformers. In circuit design for communications systems, for example, a large area of the board is taken up by on-chip passive devices. For example, 90-95% of components in a cellular telephone are passive components, taking up approximately 80% of the total transceiver board, which accounts for about 70% of the cost. To reduce the space taken up by the passive devices, very small discrete passive components and the integration of the passive components are under development.
Multi-chip module, system on chip (SOC)/system on package (SOP) in which the passives and interconnects are incorporated into the carrier substrate offer an attractive solution to further increase the integration. For example, SOC is a fully integrated design with RF passive devices and digital and analog circuits on the same chip. Their operation on CMOS grade silicon, however, is degraded by the high loss of transmissions lines and antennas. On the other hand, BiCMOS technologies present a cost effective option to realize highly integrated systems combining analog, microwave design techniques, transmission lines and other passive components.
In any event, many efforts have been made to reduce the size of the passive devices. For example, to reduce the space taken up by the passive components, discrete passive components have been replaced with on-chip passive components. However, size reduction of passive components may depend at least in part on the further development of on-chip interconnects, such as slow-wave coplanar waveguide (CPW) structures, for microwave and millimeter microwave integrated circuits (MICs), microwave and millimeter monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs), and radiofrequency integrated circuits (RFICs) used in communications systems. In particular, interconnects that promote slow-wave propagation can be employed to reduce the sizes and cost of distributed elements to implement delay lines, variable phase shifters, voltage-tunable filters, etc. However, advanced coplanar waveguide structures are needed for radiofrequency and microwave integrated circuits to serve as interconnects that promote slow-wave propagation, as well as related design structures for radio frequency and microwave integrated circuits.
Accordingly, there exists a need in the art to overcome the deficiencies and limitations described hereinabove.
In a first aspect of the invention, a structure comprises at least one ground and a signal layer provided in a same plane as the at least one ground. The signal layer has at least one alternating wide portion and narrow portion. The wide portion extends toward the at least one ground.
In a second aspect of the invention, a method of tuning a coplanar waveguide structure, comprises tuning at least one of a capacitance and inductance of the coplanar waveguide structure by adjusting a spacing between at least one of a wide portion and a narrow portion of a signal line and a ground, which is in a same plane as the signal line.
In another aspect of the invention, a design structure tangibly embodied in a machine readable storage medium for designing, manufacturing, or testing an integrated circuit is provided. The design structure comprises the structures of the present invention. In further embodiments, a hardware description language (HDL) design structure encoded on a machine-readable data storage medium comprises elements that when processed in a computer-aided design system generates a machine-executable representation of the coplanar waveguide structure (CPW), which comprises the structures of the present invention. In still further embodiments, a method in a computer-aided design system is provided for generating a functional design model of the CPW. The method comprises generating a functional representation of the structural elements of the CPW.
The present invention is described in the detailed description which follows, in reference to the noted plurality of drawings by way of non-limiting examples of exemplary embodiments of the present invention.
The invention generally relates to waveguide structures and, in particular, to on-chip high performance slow-wave coplanar waveguide structures, method of manufacture and design structures for integrated circuits. In embodiments, the present invention provides a compact on-chip slow-wave coplanar waveguide (CPW) structure which has more design flexibility to achieve improved slow-wave effects, compared to conventional structures. For example, the present invention provides ideal on-chip slow-wave structures with low losses and improved characteristic impedance, while utilizing considerably less board area than conventional systems. Advantageously, the on-chip slow-wave coplanar waveguide (CPW) structure can be fabricated using conventional CMOS fabrication technology using multi-layer structures in current standard semiconductor processes.
In embodiments, the CPW structure of the present invention includes a signal layer comprising a plurality of cells, where each cell has a narrow (W1) portion and a wide (W2) portion, in an alternating arrangement. In embodiments, the CPW structure can also include a cross-under and/or cross-over layer which connects with ground through the use of vias, the crossing layers are under and/or above the wide portion of the signal cell. The ground can also include short and long portions, coinciding respectively with the narrow and wide portions of the signal layer.
In embodiments, the CPW structures can be adjusted by using different W1, W2 values and W1/W2 ratios, different separations, pitch, and adding floating strips above and below the CPW structures. That is, the slow-wave effect of the CPW structures can be tuned by, for example,
From experimental data, it has also been found that the CPW structures have improved slow-wave effect, with about 96% of capacitance per unit length increasing and more than 77% of inductance per unit length increasing, compared with non-slow-wave CPW structures.
By way of background, from the transmission line theory, the wavelength λ, phase velocity v and characteristics impedance Zo are given respectively as:
where f is the operating frequency, L and C are the inductance and capacitance per unit length, respectively, v is phase velocity and λ is the wavelength.
From the above equations, the wavelength can be made smaller while the characteristic impendence is kept unchanged by increasing L and C with the same ratio. Also, increasing either or both the inductance L and/or capacitance C will decrease the velocity v and hence the wavelength λ. And, decreasing the wavelength λ will physically reduce the dimension of passive components such as branchline coupler which includes four quarter wavelength arms, thereby reducing the chip space needed for the CPW structure and components built with them.
The signal layer 12 and grounds 14 can be formed using conventional lithographic, etching and deposition processes, commonly employed in CMOS fabrication. For example, a resist can be placed over an insulating layer and exposed to light to form patterns, corresponding with the shapes of the signal layer 12 and the grounds 14. The exposed regions of the insulating layer are then etched to form trenches using conventional processes such as, for example, reactive ion etching. A metal or metal alloy layer is then deposited in the trenches to form the signal layer 12 and grounds 14.
Inductance and capacitance of the CPW structure 10 can be tuned by varying the widths W1, W2 and, hence, the spacing S1, S2 between the signal layer 12 and the grounds 14. For example, inductance L of the CPW structure will be mainly decided by the narrower signal line (W1) and the larger spacing (S1); whereas, capacitance C of the CPW structure will be mainly decided by the wider signal line (W2) and the smaller spacing (S2). More specifically, a larger inductance L can be achieved as width W1 becomes smaller and spacing S1 becomes larger. Likewise, a larger capacitance C can be achieved as width W1 becomes larger and S1 becomes smaller. Thus, by changing the values of W1, W2, S1 and S2, different L and C values can be achieved, resulting in different characteristic impedance and changing or tuning the slow-wave effect. Cross-over and/or cross-under strips can also be used to improve the slow-wave effect.
As thus should be understood by those of skill in the art, the capacitance and inductance of the coplanar waveguide structure can be tune by adjusting a space between the wide portion and the narrow portion of the signal line and the ground. It is also contemplated to tune the structure by adjusting a width of the ground and/or providing a conductive wiring underneath and/or over the signal line.
(i) line “A” represents a signal layer having a width W2 of 10 microns and corresponding spacing S2 of 2.8 micron and a width W1 of 2 microns and corresponding spacing S1 of 6.8 microns;
(ii) line “B” represents a signal layer having a width W2 of 8 microns and corresponding spacing S2 of 1 micron and a width W1 of 1 micron and corresponding spacing S1 of 11.5 microns; and
(iii) line “C” has a uniform width of 8 microns and a uniform spacing of 4 microns.
Graphs 8 and 9 show three lines “A”, “A′” and “C”. Line “A′” represents a CPW structure with a signal layer having the same dimensions as the CPW structure represented by line “A” of
Design flow 900 may vary depending on the type of representation being designed. For example, a design flow 900 for building an application specific IC (ASIC) may differ from a design flow 900 for designing a standard component or from a design flow 900 for instantiating the design into a programmable array, for example a programmable gate array (PGA) or a field programmable gate array (FPGA) offered by manufacturers such as ALTERA® Inc. or XILINX® Inc.
Design process 910 preferably employs and incorporates hardware and/or software modules for synthesizing, translating, or otherwise processing a design/simulation functional equivalent of the components, circuits, devices, or logic structures shown in
Design process 910 may include hardware and software modules for processing a variety of input data structure types including netlist 980. Such data structure types may reside, for example, within library elements 930 and include a set of commonly used elements, circuits, and devices, including models, layouts, and symbolic representations, for a given manufacturing technology (e.g., different technology nodes, 32 nm, 45 nm, 90 nm, etc.). The data structure types may further include design specifications 940, characterization data 950, verification data 960, design rules 970, and test data files 985 which may include input test patterns, output test results, and other testing information. Design process 910 may further include, for example, standard mechanical design processes such as stress analysis, thermal analysis, mechanical event simulation, process simulation for operations such as casting, molding, and die press forming, etc. One of ordinary skill in the art of mechanical design can appreciate the extent of possible mechanical design tools and applications used in design process 910 without deviating from the scope and spirit of the invention. Design process 910 may also include modules for performing standard circuit design processes such as timing analysis, verification, design rule checking, place and route operations, etc.
Design process 910 employs and incorporates logic and physical design tools such as HDL compilers and simulation model build tools to process design structure 920 together with some or all of the depicted supporting data structures along with any additional mechanical design or data (if applicable), to generate a second design structure 990.
Design structure 990 resides on a storage medium or programmable gate array in a data format used for the exchange of data of mechanical devices and structures (e.g. information stored in a initial graphics exchange specification (IGES), drawing interchange format/drawing exchange format (DXF), Parasolid XT, JT, DRG, or any other suitable format for storing or rendering such mechanical design structures). Similar to design structure 920, design structure 990 preferably comprises one or more files, data structures, or other computer-encoded data or instructions that reside on transmission or data storage media and that when processed by an ECAD system generate a logically or otherwise functionally equivalent form of one or more of the embodiments of the invention shown in
Design structure 990 may also employ a data format used for the exchange of layout data of integrated circuits and/or symbolic data format (e.g. information stored in a GDSII (GDS2), Global 1 (GL1), Open Artwork System Interchange Standard (OASIS), map files, or any other suitable format for storing such design data structures). Design structure 990 may comprise information such as, for example, symbolic data, map files, test data files, design content files, manufacturing data, layout parameters, wires, levels of metal, vias, shapes, data for routing through the manufacturing line, and any other data required by a manufacturer or other designer/developer to produce a device or structure as described above and shown in
The method as described above is used in the fabrication of integrated circuit chips. The resulting integrated circuit chips can be distributed by the fabricator in raw wafer form (that is, as a single wafer that has multiple unpackaged chips), as a bare die, or in a packaged form. In the latter case the chip is mounted in a single chip package (such as a plastic carrier, with leads that are affixed to a motherboard or other higher level carrier) or in a multichip package (such as a ceramic carrier that has either or both surface interconnections or buried interconnections). In any case the chip is then integrated with other chips, discrete circuit elements, and/or other signal processing devices as part of either (a) an intermediate product, such as a motherboard, or (b) an end product. The end product can be any product that includes integrated circuit chips, ranging from toys and other low-end applications to advanced computer products having a display, a keyboard or other input device, and a central processor.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims, if applicable, are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principals of the invention and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. Accordingly, while the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those of skill in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modifications and in the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4914407 | Itoh | Apr 1990 | A |
5150436 | Jaeger et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5291162 | Ito et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5459633 | Kosslowski et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5869429 | Das | Feb 1999 | A |
5952901 | Nakano | Sep 1999 | A |
6023209 | Faulkner et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6577211 | Tsujiguchi | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6650192 | Hayashi | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6794947 | Lin | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7005726 | Carpentier | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7245195 | Satoh et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
20050093737 | Schoebel | May 2005 | A1 |
20060044073 | Stoneham | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060158286 | Lai et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080048799 | Wang et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090195327 | Cho et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090251232 | Ding et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 8302687 | Aug 1983 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ma et al., “Experimentally Investigating . . . Periodic Cells”, IEEE, 2005, (4 pages). |
Cheung et al., “Shielded Passive Devices . . . Circuits”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41, No. 5, May 2006, pp. 1183-1200. |
Wu et al., “Hybrid-Mode Analysis of . . . Lines”, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Tech., vol. 39, No. 8, Aug. 1991, pp. 1348-1360. |
Tilmans et al., “MEMS for wireless communications . . . RF-MEMS-SiP”, J. Micromech. Microeng. 13 (2003), pp. S139-S163. |
Ponchak, “RF Transmission Lines on Silicon Substrates”, 29th European Microwave Conf. Digest, Oct. 1999, (4 pages). |
Sakagami et al., “A Reduced Branch-Line Coupler with Eight Stubs”, 1997 Asia Pacific Microwave Conf., pp. 1137-1140. |
Sor et al., “A Novel Low-Loss . . . Filter Applications”, IEEE, 2001, 4 pages. |
Sun et al., “A Compact Branch-Line Coupler Using Discontinuous Microstrip Lines”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 15, No. 8, Aug. 2005, pp. 519-520. |
Martin et al., “Dual Electromagnetic Bandgap CPW Structures for Filter Applications”, IEEE Microwave and Wireless components letters, vol. 13, No. 9, Sep. 2003, pp. 393-395. |
Seki et al., “Cross-Tie Slow-Wave Coplanar Waveguide on Semi-Insulating GaAs Substrates”, Electronic Letters, vol. 17, No. 25, Dec. 10, 1981, pp. 940-941. |
Wang et. al., “Novel Low-Cost On-Chip CPW Slow-Wave Structure for . . . Applications”, Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2008, pp. 186-190. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110241796 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |