Patent Grant
8519030
This application is a national stage application of International Application No. PCT/EP2009/050261, filed 12 Jan. 2009, which claims priority from European Patent Application Serial No. 08 101 595.0, filed 13 Feb. 2008, from which applications priority is claimed, and which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to a copolymer, the preparation of the copolymer and a building material mixture.
It is known that admixtures in the form of dispersants are often added to aqueous slurries of pulverulent inorganic or organic substances, such as clays, silicate powder, chalk, carbon black, crushed rock and hydraulic binders, for improving their processability, i.e. kneadability, spreadability, sprayability, pumpability or flowability. Such admixtures are capable of preventing the formation of solid agglomerates, dispersing already present particles and particles newly formed by hydration and in this way improving the processability. This effect is also utilized in a targeted manner in particular in the production of building material mixtures which contain hydraulic binders, such as cement, lime, gypsum, hemihydrate or anhydrite.
In order to convert these building material mixtures based on said binders into a ready-to-use, processable form, as a rule substantially more mixing water is required than would be necessary for the subsequent hydration or hardening process. The proportion of cavities which are formed by the excess, subsequently evaporating water in the concrete body leads to significantly poorer mechanical strengths and stabilities.
In order to reduce this excess proportion of water at a specified processing consistency and/or to improve the processability at a specified water/binder ratio, admixtures that are generally referred to as water-reducing agents or superplasticizers are used. Agents of this type which are used in practice are in particular copolymers which are prepared by free radical copolymerization of acid monomers and/or acid derivative monomers with polyether macromonomers.
WO 20051075529 describes copolymers which, in addition to acid monomer structural units, have vinyloxybutylenepoly(ethylene glycol) structural units as polyether macromonomer structural units. Such copolymer types are widely used as high-performance superplasticizers since they have excellent performance characteristics. In this context, the robustness or universality with regard to the use of different cements, different mixing procedures and different temperatures of use should be particularly singled out. The concrete containing these high-performance superplasticizers is usually distinguished by particularly good processability.
The vinyloxybutylenepoly(ethylene glycol) used as a monomeric precursor of these copolymers is obtained by ethoxylation of 4-hydroxybutyl vinyl ether. 4-Hydroxybutyl vinyl ether is an industrial secondary product of acetylene. Owing to the fact that the chemistry based on acetylene (Reppe chemistry) has been very substantially replaced by the chemistry based on ethylene, the industrial production of 4-hydroxybutyl vinyl ether is associated with the few industrial locations still operating Reppe chemistry. It can also usually be assumed that 4-hydroxybutyl vinyl ether cannot or will not be able to be particularly economically prepared as a product of the Reppe chemistry, which is complicated particularly in point of view of safety. The abovementioned accordingly also affects the availability and the costs of vinyloxybutylenepoly(ethylene glycol) and the corresponding copolymers.
The object of the present invention is therefore to provide an economical dispersant for hydraulic binders which is particularly suitable as a superplasticizer/water-reducing agent for concrete.
This object is achieved by a copolymer comprising
The determination of a (number of alkoxy groups) in the isoprenol polyether derivative structural unit α according to the general formula (Ia) is effected on the basis of so-called MALDI-TOF-MS measurements (MALDI-TOF-MS is an abbreviation for Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time Of Flight Mass Spectroscopy). The MALDI-TOF-MS measurements carried out in this context were carried out on a “Bruker Reflex III”, equipped with a 337 nm nitrogen laser. The acceleration voltage was 20 kV and the detection of the cation spectra was effected in the reflector mode.
Dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) was used as a matrix and potassium chloride from Merck KGaA as the salt. The sample was prepared as a solid. For this purpose, in each case a pinch of the corresponding sample was dissolved in THF. A small part of the dissolved sample was then triturated with a pinch of DHB and a pinch of potassium chloride in a mortar. A part of this mixture was applied to a sample target by means of a spatula. The calibration was effected with an external standard which was composed of the following peptides (Pepmix): 10 pm/μl of Bradikinin, 10 pm/μl of Angiotensin I, 10 pm/μl of Angiotensin II, 10 pm/μl of Neurotensin and 10 pm/μl of ACTH. The peptides were dissolved in a mixture of 20% by weight of acetonitrile, 79.9% by weight of H2O and 0.1% by weight of formic acid. The Pepmix is additionally diluted with H2O. For the calibration, 1 μl of Pepmix was mixed with 1 μl of DHB solution on a spot of the target. A methanol-water mixture in the ratio 1:1 was used as the solvent for the DHB solution. The concentration was 10 mg/ml.
The isoprenol polyether derivative structural unit α is decisively involved in the dispersing effect of the copolymer. The precursor of the corresponding monomeric starting compound is isoprenol (3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol). Isoprenol is a product of olefinic chemistry, which is obtained, for example, in large amounts as an intermediate in the citral synthesis. In general, it may be said that isoprenol may be regarded as an economical intermediate of the chemical industry which is available in large amounts. This means that the copolymers according to the invention which are based on alkoxylated isoprenol are correspondingly highly attractive economically. Also important is that the copolymers according to the invention have the excellent performance characteristics of the high-performance superplasticizers which are described above.
Finally, regarding the preparation of the copolymer (polymerization process), it should be mentioned that alkoxylated isoprenol is easier to handle in terms of process engineering, owing to the particularly high resistance to acidic hydrolysis compared with vinyloxybutylenepoly(ethylene glycol).
In the general formula (Ia) representing the isoprenol polyether derivative structural unit α, x is generally represented by 2 and/or 3, preferably 2. Ethoxy groups or mixtures of ethoxy and propoxy groups are therefore typical.
In the general formula (Ia) representing the isoprenol polyether derivative structural unit α, a=6 to 15 preferably for at least 20 mol %, particularly preferably for at least 35 mol %, of all (AO)a side chain segments and a=19 to 35 preferably for a further at least 20 mol %, particularly preferably for a further at least 35 mol %, of all (AO)a side chain segments. This can be achieved by using two different types of isoprenol polyether derivative monomers in the copolymerization. One type then has, for example, a frequency-average value with regard to a of 11 and the other type accordingly of about 24. This mixture of longer and shorter polyether side chains in the copolymer increases the performance thereof.
The isoprenol polyether derivative structural unit α is preferably present in a relative proportion of 25 to 50 mol %, particularly preferably 30 to 45 mol %. As a rule, the acrylic acid derivative structural unit β is present in a relative proportion of 35 to 60 mol %, particularly preferably 40 to 55 mol %. The hydroxyalkyl acrylate structural unit γ is preferably present in a relative proportion of 2 to 30 mol %, particularly preferably 6 to 23 mol %.
In general, the acrylic acid derivative structural unit β is represented by the general formula (IIb). R2 is then usually represented by OH. Acrylic acid is therefore preferably used as the monomer producing the acrylic acid derivative structural unit β.
In a preferred embodiment, in the hydroxyalkyl acrylate structural unit γ which is represented by the general formula (III), R3 is represented by —CH2—CHOH—CH3, —CHCH3—CH2—OH and/or —CH2—CH2—OH.
Frequently, the copolymer according to the invention has a weight average molecular weight of 10 000 to 100 000.
As a rule, the copolymer according to the invention is present in aqueous solution which contains 30 to 95% by weight of water and 5 to 70% by weight of dissolved dry matter. The dry matter then usually substantially comprises the anhydrous copolymer.
In addition to the isoprenol polyether derivative structural unit α, the acrylic acid derivative structural unit β and the hydroxyalkyl acrylate structural unit γ, the copolymer according to the invention may also have at least one further structural unit. In such a case, the copolymer may have at least 1 mol % of an isoprenol structural unit α′, which is represented by the general formula (IVa)
By incorporating the isoprenol structural unit α′ in the form of polymerized units, the side chain density and hence the performance characteristics of the copolymer can be modified.
The invention also relates to the preparation of the copolymer according to the invention by free radical solution polymerization at 0 to 40° C. in the presence of a redox initiator, water being used as a solvent. However, the copolymer according to the invention can also be prepared by any other process.
The present invention also relates to a building material mixture containing copolymer according to the invention and a hydraulic binder and/or a latently hydraulic binder. Typically, the hydraulic binder is present as cement, lime, gypsum, hemihydrate or anhydrite or as mixtures of these components, but preferably as cement. The latently hydraulic binder is usually present as fly ash, trass or a blast furnace slag.
The present invention is to be described in more detail below with reference to working examples.
Copolymers according to the invention (according to Preparation Examples 1 and 2) are to be compared with copolymers which are already successfully used in practice (according to Comparative Examples 1 and 2) with regard to the performance thereof.
A glass reactor equipped with a plurality of feed possibilities, stirrer and dropping funnel was loaded with 87 ml of water, 37.5 g of macromonomer 1 (prepared by ethoxylation of 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol with 11 mol of EO) and 82.5 g of macromonomer 2 (prepared by ethoxylation of 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol with 22 mol of EO) (solution A) and thermostatted at 16° C. A portion of a second prepared, partly neutralized solution (solution B), consisting of 54.11 g of water, 19.34 g of acrylic acid (90%) and 7.02 g of hydroxypropyl acrylate (96%), was added to solution A over a period of 15 min in the glass reactor. Furthermore, 1.74 g of 3-mercaplopropionic acid were added to the reactor. A 3rd solution (solution C), consisting of 3 g of sodium hydroxymethanesulphinate dihydrate and 47 g of water, was prepared. Thereafter, 46.5 mg of iron(II) sulphate heptahydrate, dissolved in a few drops of water, and 2.87 g of 30% strength hydrogen peroxide solution were added to solution A at a temperature of 16° C. Furthermore, the still remaining solution B was metered into solution A over 45 minutes and solution C was metered into solution A over 60 minutes. Finally˜21 ml of 20% strength sodium hydroxide solution were added and a pH of 6.5 was established.
The aqueous solution of a copolymer having an average molecular weight of Mw=24 500 g/mol, a polydispersity of 1.66 and a solids content of 44.3% was obtained. The yield of polymer in comparison with unsaturated alcohol ethoxylate not incorporated in the following polymerized units was 95% (determined by gel permeation chromatography, referred to below as GPC).
A glass reactor equipped with a plurality of feed possibilities, stirrer and dropping funnel was loaded with 87 ml of water, 37.5 g of macromonomer 1 (prepared by ethoxylation of 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol with 11 mol of EO) and 82.5 g of macromonomer 2 (prepared by ethoxylation of 3-methyl-3-buten-1-ol with 22 mol of EO) (solution A) and thermostatted at 14° C. A portion of a second prepared, partly neutralized solution (solution B), consisting of 58.9 g of water, 16.6 g of acrylic acid (90%) and 11.7 g of hydroxypropyl acrylate (96%), was added to solution A over a period of 15 min in the glass reactor. The remaining residue was supplemented with 0.96 g of 3-mercaptopropionic acid. Furthermore, 1.92 g of 3-mercaptopropionic acid were added to the reactor. A 3rd solution (solution C), consisting of 3 g of sodium hydroxymethanesulphinate dihydrate and 47 g of water, was prepared. Thereafter, 46.5 mg of iron(II) sulphate heptahydrate, dissolved in a few drops of water, and 2.87 g of 30% strength hydrogen peroxide solution were added to solution A at a temperature of 14° C. Furthermore, the still remaining solution 8 was metered into solution A over 45 minutes and solution C was metered into solution A over 60 minutes. Finally 16.5 g of 20% strength sodium hydroxide solution were added and a pH of 6.5 was established. An aqueous solution of a copolymer having an average molecular weight of Mw=23 000 g/mol, a polydispersity of 1.86 and a solids content of 43.6% was obtained. The yield of polymer in comparison with unsaturated alcohol ethoxylate not incorporated in the following polymerized units was 97.7% (determined by GPC).
Commercial concrete superplasticizer Glenium® Sky 593 (from BASF Construction Polymers GmbH) based on a copolymer of vinyloxybutylenepoly(ethylene glycol), an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid and an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid derivative—the polymer according to Comparative Example 1 has a closely related polymer architecture in comparison with copolymer type 1.
Commercial concrete superplasticizer Glenium® Sky 594 (from BASF Construction Polymers GmbH) based on a copolymer of vinyloxybutylenepoly(ethylene glycol), an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid and an ethylenically unsaturated carboxylic acid derivative—the polymer according to Comparative Example 2 has a closely related polymer architecture in comparison with copolymer type 2.
First the polymerization behaviour in relation to the achieved molecular weight distribution and conversion is to be considered. Table 1 shows that the preparation of the polymers according to the invention takes place with in each case somewhat higher conversions than those of the comparative polymers. A further important criterion for good performance in the concrete is the average molar mass of the polymers.
Table 1 shows in each case the values for Mw and for the polydispersity (Pd). Both products according to the invention have an average molar mass in the range of the comparative polymers. The polydispersities are likewise in a comparative range.
For further evaluation of the copolymers, concrete tests were carried out. The experimental procedures are described in Use Examples 1 and 2. In the tests, it was intended to check whether the copolymers according to the invention showed a good performance, i.e. the same plasticization and the same slump over time, under the same test conditions (w/c value, temperature, aggregates, etc.) and in the same dose.
Carrying Out the Concrete Tests:
280 kg of Portland cement (CEM I 42.5 R, Mergelstetten) were stirred with round aggregates having a composition, according to the Fuller screening curve, at a maximum particle size of 16 mm, 80 kg of limestone powder filler Calcit MS 12 and 156.8 kg of water, which contained the products according to the invention or the comparative products in dissolved form. Immediately after the preparation of the concrete mix, the determination of the slump and the change thereof as a function of time over a period of 60 minutes was effected.
The results of the test are shown in the tables below.
280 kg of Portland cement (CEM I 42.5 R, Karlstadt) were stirred with round aggregates having a composition, according to the Fuller screening curve, at a maximum particle size of 16 mm, 80 kg of limestone powder filler Calcit MS 12 and 162.4 kg of water, which contained the products according to the invention or the comparative products in dissolved form. Immediately after the preparation of the concrete mix, the determination of the slump and the change thereof as a function of time over a period of 60 minutes was effected.
The results are shown in the tables below.
Table 2 shows the results of the concrete tests using Mergelstetten cement. For both example polymers, virtually identical plasticization can be observed at the same dose. In addition, like the comparative polymers, they can keep the slump virtually constant over 60 minutes. The test using Karlstadt cement also shows virtually identical behaviour of the example polymers with their references (Table 3).
The results show that the copolymers according to the invention have properties comparable to the known high-performance superplasticizers with regard to their behaviour in concrete. In addition, the robustness/universality of the copolymers according to the invention is also confirmed by the use of different cements.
Table 4 shows the results for the slump-flow on the basis of Example 1 and the corresponding comparative polymer. With use of the same dose, comparable behaviour is observable here, too. This is further confirmation that the addition of the copolymers according to the invention results in a concrete which has a comparable consistency and just as good processability as is the case with the use of the high-performance superplasticizers successfully employed as a reference.
Overall conclusion from the results of the comparative experiments:
The above experiments show that the quality of the superplasticizers based on the copolymers according to the invention is outstanding. The performance is comparable with the vinyloxybutylenepoly(ethylene glycol)-based high-performance polymers which have already proved their worth in practice.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08101595 | Feb 2008 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2009/050261 | 1/12/2009 | WO | 00 | 10/22/2010 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2009/100957 | 8/20/2009 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2164871 | Eichenlaub | Jul 1939 | A |
| 4888059 | Yamaguchi et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4968734 | Gaidis et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5081111 | Akimoto et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5162402 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5320837 | Akimoto et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5350450 | Hamabe et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5358566 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5362323 | Koyata et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5362324 | Cerulli et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5369198 | Albrecht et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5432212 | Honda et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5634966 | Berke et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5661206 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5665158 | Darwin et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5703174 | Arfaei et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5725657 | Darwin et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5798425 | Albrecht et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5834576 | Nagano et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840114 | Jeknavorian et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5911820 | Satoh et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5912284 | Hirata et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5925184 | Hirata et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 6077910 | Ikuta et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6165262 | Kono et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166112 | Hirata et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6187841 | Tanaka et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6211317 | Albrecht et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6214958 | Le-Khac et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6294015 | Yamashita et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6376581 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6384111 | Kistenmacher et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6387173 | Greenwood et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6387176 | Widmer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6391923 | Pöllmann et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6437027 | Isomura et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6486260 | Yuasa et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6653441 | Harre et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6680348 | Amaya et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6712900 | Wombacher et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6727315 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6762220 | Yaguchi et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6777517 | Albrecht et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6815513 | Le-Khac et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6855752 | Velten et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6864337 | Yuasa et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6911494 | Yamashita et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 7026402 | Schober et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7125944 | Yamashita et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7375163 | Schober et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7405264 | Yuasa et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7425596 | Kraus et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7482405 | Matsumoto et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 20020103290 | Pollmann et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020193547 | Yuasa et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030125492 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030209695 | Tsuzuki et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040204517 | Yamashita et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050171325 | Matsui et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004148 | Sulser et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100355 | Waser et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060111478 | Hommer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060183820 | Asano et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060247402 | Matsumoto et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281885 | Bichler et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281886 | Bichler et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070039515 | Bandoh et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070043190 | Kraus et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070073022 | Yuasa et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070161724 | Moraru et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070181039 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070255032 | Bichler et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080017078 | Bichler et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080295741 | Jeknavorian et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080300343 | Becker et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090163622 | Albrecht et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090234046 | Izumi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090312460 | Lorenz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090312504 | Lorenz et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 103 37 975 | Apr 2005 | DE |
| 0537870 | Apr 1993 | EP |
| 1016638 | Jul 2000 | EP |
| 1061089 | Mar 2004 | EP |
| 1218427 | Oct 2005 | EP |
| 1655272 | May 2006 | EP |
| 2090553 | Aug 2009 | EP |
| 2090596 | Aug 2009 | EP |
| 2090597 | Aug 2009 | EP |
| 2090599 | Aug 2009 | EP |
| 2113519 | Nov 2009 | EP |
| 59-162160 | Sep 1984 | JP |
| 2002179449 | Jun 2002 | JP |
| 2005330129 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| WO 2005075529 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006133933 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| STN Structure Search (Jun. 25, 2012). |
| Abstract of KR 2004100817 A; B. M. Kim, Dec. 2004. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110054083 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |
