The invention relates to a high-strength copper-zinc-nickel-manganese alloy.
Copper-zinc alloys which contain from 8 to 20% by weight of nickel are known under the name “nickel silver”. Owing to the high proportion of nickel, they are very corrosion-resistant and have a high strength. Most nickel silver alloys contain small amounts of manganese. Particularly high-strength nickel silver alloys are CuNi18Zn20 and CuNi18Zn19Pb1. They have tensile strengths of up to 1000 MPa. Both alloys contain less than 1% by weight of manganese. A significantly larger proportion of manganese of about 5% by weight is present in the alloy CuNi12Zn38Mn5Pb2. Materials composed of this alloy can have a tensile strength of 650 MPa.
It is known from the document FR 897484 that nickel in nickel silver alloys can be replaced by manganese. The manganese-containing nickel silver alloys proposed there contain at least as much manganese as nickel. Tensile strengths of up to 630 MPa, on addition of 1.5% by weight of iron up to 710 MPa, can be achieved in the case of these alloys.
It is an object of the invention to provide a copper alloy having a high strength, hardness, ductility, wear resistance, corrosion resistance and good antimicrobial and also antifouling properties. It should be possible to produce semifinished parts from the alloy on an industrial scale by means of conventional process steps. In particular, it should be possible to achieve high degrees of cold deformation without intermediate annealing in order to keep the manufacturing costs low.
The invention is defined by the features of claim 1. The further dependent claims relate to advantageous embodiments and further developments of the invention.
The invention encompasses a copper alloy having the following composition (in % by weight):
The invention proceeds from the thought that an alloy having an extraordinary property profile is formed by alloying of particular amounts of zinc, nickel and manganese into copper.
The proportion of zinc in the alloy is at least 17% by weight and not more than 20.5% by weight. As inexpensive element, zinc should be present in as large as possible a proportion in the alloy. However, a proportion of zinc of more than 20.5% by weight leads to a significant reduction in the ductility and also to a decrease in the corrosion resistance.
The proportion of nickel in the alloy is at least 17% by weight and not more than 23% by weight. Nickel provides the alloy with a high strength and good corrosion resistance. For this reason, the alloy has to contain at least 17% by weight, preferably at least 18% by weight, of nickel. For cost reasons, the alloy should contain not more than 23% by weight, preferably not more than 21% by weight of nickel.
The proportion of manganese in the alloy is at least 8% by weight and not more than 11.5% by weight. In the presence of nickel, manganese can form manganese- and nickel-containing precipitates of the type MnNi2 and MnNi. This effect becomes significant only above a proportion of manganese of about 8% by weight. Above a proportion of 8% by weight of manganese, the concentration of the precipitates in the alloy is so high that a heat treatment in the temperature range from 310 to 450° C. carried out after cold forming leads to a significant increase in the strength of the alloy. At proportions of manganese above 11.5% by weight, an increase in crack formation during hot forming is observed. For this reason, the proportion of manganese should not exceed 11.5% by weight. The proportion of manganese is preferably at least 9% by weight. The proportion of manganese is preferably not more than 11% by weight.
The ratio of the proportion of nickel to the proportion of manganese is at least 1.7 so that precipitates of the type MnNi2 and MnNi can be formed. These precipitates are embedded in the microstructure of the alloy.
The proportion of copper in the alloy should be at least 45% by weight. The proportion of copper is critical in determining the antimicrobial properties of the alloy. For this reason, the proportion of copper should be at least 45% by weight, preferably at least 48% by weight.
Up to 2% by weight of chromium can optionally be added to the alloy. Chromium forms an additional species of precipitates in addition to the MnNi and MnNi2 precipitates. Chromium thus contributes to a further increase in the strength. At least 0.2% by weight of chromium should preferably be added to the alloy in order to achieve a significant effect.
Up to 5.5% by weight of iron can optionally be added to the alloy. Iron forms an additional type of precipitates in addition to the MnNi and MnNi2 precipitates. Iron thus contributes to a further increase in the strength. At least 0.2% by weight of iron should preferably be added to the alloy in order to achieve a significant effect.
The optional elements Ti, B and Ca bring about grain refinement of the microstructure. The optional element Pb improves the cutting machinability of the material. It needs to be taken into account that Pb impairs the hot formability, so that hot forming is avoided if significant amounts of Pb have been alloyed in.
The alloy is free of beryllium and elements of the group of the rare earths.
The particular advantage of the invention is that an alloy which has a particular property profile as wrought material is formed by the specific selection of the proportions of the elements zinc, nickel and manganese. It is characterized by an excellent combination of strength, ductility, deep drawability, corrosion resistance and spring properties. It has excellent microbial and antifouling properties. Materials having a tensile strength of at least 1100 MPa and/or a yield point of at least 1000 MPa can be produced by precipitation hardening.
After casting of a casting format, the alloy can, without solution heat treatment, either be hot formed or the casting format can be cold formed directly without hot forming. In the first process variant, hot forming at temperatures in the range from 650° C. to 850° C. is carried out after casting and cooling of the alloy. The alloy is then cold formed, with a degree of deformation of up to 99% being able to be achieved. A degree of deformation of at least 90% is preferred. Here, the degree of deformation is the relative decrease in the cross section of the workpiece. After cold forming, the alloy is heat treated at a temperature in the range from 310° C. to 500° C. for a time in the range from 10 minutes to 30 hours. Precipitates of the type MnNi2 and MnNi are formed in the microstructure of the material as a result. The precipitates considerably increase the strength of the material. The greater the degree of deformation in the preceding cold forming has been, the higher the strength of the material after the heat treatment. If the alloy is cold formed with a degree of deformation of at least 95%, then the material after the heat treatment has a tensile strength Rm of up to 1350 MPa and a yield point Rp0.2 of up to 1300 MPa. The hardness of such a material is up to 460 HV10. At a degree of deformation of 90%, the material after the heat treatment has a tensile strength Rm of up to 1260 MPa and a yield point Rp0.2 of up to 1200 MPa at an elongation at break of 2.1%. To produce such high-strength materials, the temperature for the heat treatment is preferably in the range from 330 to 370° C. The duration of the heat treatment is in the range from 2 to 30 hours.
Softer states having a tensile strength of about 700 MPa at an elongation at break of 30% can also be set by selecting the heat treatment temperature above 450° C. and the duration of the heat treatment below one hour.
Studies have shown that cracks occur during hot forming when the alloy contains more than 12% by weight of manganese. During hot rolling, the cracks form from the lateral edges of the rolled strip. The utilizable width of the strip is thus significantly reduced. It can also be assumed that microcracks are also formed in the regions of the strip in which no cracks are discernible with the naked eye. In order to avoid the formation of such cracks, the proportion of manganese in the alloy must not exceed 11.5% by weight.
The proportion of manganese thus has to be set within a narrowly delimited range for the advantages of precipitate formation to be able to be utilized but crack formation during hot forming to be avoided. The alloy of the invention thus represents a particularly advantageous selection. In particular, the proportions of zinc and manganese in the alloy are set so that the alloy can firstly be hot formed without problems but secondly permits a high degree of cold forming.
In the second, alternative process variant, the alloy is processed without hot forming. For this purpose, the cast state of the alloy is cold formed. A total degree of deformation of up to 90% can be achieved. After cold forming with a total degree of deformation of at least 80%, the material has a tensile strength Rm of 850 MPa and a yield point Rp0.2 of 835 MPa. The elongation at break is 3% and the hardness is 276 HV10. A tensile strength above 900 MPa can be achieved by cold forming with a degree of deformation of 90%.
Materials composed of the alloy of the invention are very fatigue resistant, oil corrosion resistant and low-wear. They are therefore suitable for use in sliding bearings, tools, relays and clock and watch components. Furthermore, such materials have good spring properties. Owing to their high resilience, they can elastically store a large amount of energy. For this reason, the alloy of the invention is very suitable for springs and spring elements. The combination of cold formability, corrosion resistance and spring properties makes the alloy of the invention a preferred material for frames and hinges of spectacles.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the ratio of the proportion of Ni to the proportion of Mn can be not more than 2.3. When the ratio of Ni/Mn is selected in this way, particularly favorable conditions for the formation of precipitates of the stoichiometry MnNi prevail. When the ratio of Ni/Mn is above 2.3, precipitates of the stoichiometry MnNi2 are formed to an increasing extent since the excess of Ni is greater. Precipitates of the type MnNi bring about a greater increase in the strength than precipitates of the type MnNi2. For this reason, it is advantageous for the ratio of Ni/Mn to be not more than 2.3.
The ratio of the proportion of Ni to the proportion of Mn can advantageously be at least 1.8, particularly preferably at least 1.9. The proportion of manganese influences the elongation at break of the alloy and crack formation during hot forming. The more manganese is bound by nickel in precipitates, the greater the elongation at break and the lower the risk of crack formation during hot forming. It is therefore advantageous for at least 1.8 times, preferably at least 1.9 times, as much nickel as manganese to be present in the alloy.
Furthermore, the resistance to surface corrosion decreases with an increasing proportion of manganese. For this reason, it is advantageous for highly corrosion-relevant applications if the Mn content does not exceed 10% by weight.
In an advantageous embodiment of the invention, the proportion of Zn can be not more than 19.5%. The limiting of the proportion of Zn further decreases the risk of embrittlement of the alloy. When the proportion of Zn is not more than 19.5%, the alloy is very ductile and can very readily be both cold formed and hot formed.
The alloy of the invention advantageously has a microstructure comprising an α-phase matrix. Up to 2% by volume of β-phase can be incorporated into this α-phase matrix. Furthermore, the precipitates of the type MnNi and MnNi2 are embedded in the α-phase matrix. The virtually pure α-phase matrix of the alloy makes a high degree of cold formability possible. The proportion of the β-phase is so low that it barely impairs the cold formability. In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the α-phase matrix of the microstructure is free of β-phase. The microstructure thus consists only of α-phase with precipitates of the type MnNi and MnNi2 embedded therein. This can be achieved by a specific selection of the alloying elements, in particular of the proportion of zinc.
The invention will be illustrated with the aid of working examples. The figures show:
Samples having the composition shown in Table 1 were produced.
20%
20%
In the samples, the proportions of zinc and nickel were kept constant at 20% by weight each. The proportion of manganese was varied from 5% by weight to 15% by weight. Correspondingly, the proportion of copper decreased from 55% by weight to 45% by weight. The unavoidable impurities were less than 0.1% by weight.
The samples were melted and cast. After solidification, the cast blocks were hot rolled at 775° C. In the last row of the table, crack formation during hot rolling is documented. After hot rolling, the samples were cold rolled with a degree of deformation of 90%. In this state, hardness, tensile strength, yield point and elongation at break were measured on the samples.
After cold rolling, the samples were heat treated at 320° C. for 12 hours. After the heat treatment, hardness, tensile strength, yield point and elongation at break were likewise measured.
A comparison of the values in
The results of the studies show that very favorable conditions in the alloy are present at a proportion of manganese of about 10% by weight. Firstly, tensile strength and yield point display a maximum, and secondly the alloy does not have a tendency to form cracks in this region.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102018003216.8 | Apr 2018 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/000074 | 3/12/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/201469 | 10/24/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3627593 | Ansuini et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
4147568 | Marechal | Apr 1979 | A |
6984454 | Majagi | Jan 2006 | B2 |
10808303 | Huttner et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
11123825 | Steigerwald et al. | Sep 2021 | B2 |
20040234821 | Majagi | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20140294665 | Torre et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20160235073 | Murray et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170349975 | Laws et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180056452 | Steigerwald et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1052904 | Jul 1991 | CN |
1805845 | Jul 2006 | CN |
103502488 | Jan 2014 | CN |
105793450 | Jul 2016 | CN |
106337142 | Jan 2017 | CN |
107208188 | Sep 2017 | CN |
107790916 | Mar 2018 | CN |
1092218 | Nov 1960 | DE |
2051566 | Apr 1972 | DE |
102012014851 | Mar 2013 | DE |
897484 | Mar 1945 | FR |
2005325413 | Nov 2005 | JP |
20010011676 | Feb 2001 | KR |
704254 | Dec 1983 | SU |
201732047 | Sep 2017 | TW |
Entry |
---|
English language machine translation of CN1052904A to Ding et al. Generated Sep. 30, 2021. (Year: 2021). |
English language machine translation of CN106337142A to Cheng et al. Generated Sep. 30, 2021. (Year: 2021). |
Office Action of German Patent Office issued in corresponding German Application No. 10 2018 003 216.8 dated Jan. 14, 2019 (4 pages). |
International Search Report with English Translation issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2019/000074 dated Aug. 21, 2019 (5 pages). |
Written Opinion of International Searching Authority issued in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2019/000074 dated Aug. 21, 2019 (5 pages). |
Chinese Office Action with partial English translation issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 201980021519.9 dated Aug. 25, 2021 (9 pages). |
D.M. Ward et al., Research and development of a new Cu—Ni—Zn—Mn elastic alloy—IN629, dated May 1, 1974, pp. 84-91 (8 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210032726 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |