The present invention relates to cordless window and architectural passage coverings. In one aspect, the invention relates to an enclosed drive system for use in conjunction with a pull cord extending from a headrail of an architectural cover. In another aspect, the invention relates to a method for retro-fitting an architectural cover pull cord assembly including a pull cord associated with a cord lock and extending from a headrail of the architectural cover. More generally, the invention provides solutions for blinds, shades and other architectural coverings that would otherwise have an exposed hazardous loop.
In the provision of window and architectural passage coverings, the art has long relied on cords, string or the like to extend and retract the coverings. Such coverings take many forms, including shades such as curtains, roll-up shades, Venetian blinds, vertical blinds, cellular shades, and the like. A primary problem with such coverings that rely on cords is that small children can become entangled in the cords and experience serious harm, including strangulation and death. On Aug. 26, 2009, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission announced a voluntary recall of all ¼ inch Oval Roll-up Blinds and Woolrich Roman Shades, including some 4.2 million roll-up blinds and 600,000 Roman shades, (http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml09/09324.html). The Commission referenced the hazard that “[s]trangulations can occur if the lifting loops slide off the side of the blind and a child's neck becomes entangled on the free-standing loop or if a child places his/her neck between the lifting loop and the roll-up blind material.” Recent cited injuries include a report that “[i]n November 2007, a 1-year-old boy from Norridgewock, Me. became entangled and strangled in the lift cord loop of a roll-up blind that had fallen into his portable crib. In October 2008, a 13-month-old boy from Conway, AR was found with his head between the exposed inner cord and the cloth on the backside of a Roman shade. The cord was not looped around the boy's neck but rather ran from ear to ear and strangled the child.” Numerous manufacturers and retailers have followed the recall. Additional information may be found at: (http://www.windowcoverings.org).
In addition to the internal cords attached to the shade or blinds that can be pulled out and pose a problem, the pull cords, string and beaded cords in mechanical-based blinds and shades that are pulled on to draw up the blinds or shades also pose a risk since they also create a hazardous loop of sufficient diameter (12 inches according to the Consumer Product Safety Commission) for a small child to get their head tangled inside. The retrofit devices currently available (http://www.windowcoverings.org/how_to_retrofit.html) do not eliminate the hazardous loops created by the beaded cords even if they are tied to the wall with a tie-down device such as a Rollease™ product or with separated draw strings and/or cord stops that could still become tangled together to create a hazardous loop.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,472,035 discloses a window blind lift cord operating mechanism incorporated into the twist wand that rotates to control tilting of blind slats, wherein the operating mechanism for raising and lowering the blind and locking the blind in adjusted positions includes a lift member mounted for movement along an outer side of the wand that drives an engaging member inside the wand that engages the lift cords that also extend into a lengthwise cord passage inside the wand. The disclosed operating means also includes a lock means for locking the lift cord engaging member at selected positions along the wand. One problem with this configuration is the obvious entanglement issues that would result with the lift cords internal to a wand that is rotated to control tilting of the blind slats, wherein securing the cord within the rotating wand almost guarantees entanglement. In addition, the weight and force required to lift the bottom rail along with the blind slats would create a significant burden on the rotating gears that open and close the blind slats including the entire attachment of the wand to the headrail.
In consequence, the art is in need of improvement in coverings for architectural openings that maintains the functionality and aesthetics of previously developed coverings, but avoids their deficiencies, particularly their hazardous character regarding the risk of injury or death associated with the use of cord arrangements. The art also is in need of a new structural “fix” for the lifting mechanism of shades and blinds that avoids creating a hazardous loop.
The present invention relates to cordless architectural coverings, and assemblies and subassemblies thereof, as well as to retrofit apparatus, components and methods in which a cord loop enclosure for shades and blinds is employed to replace looped beaded cords, pull cords, and strings that drive rolling mechanisms to draw up the blinds or shades.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a mechanism for disabling the cord lock found in many blinds and shades that allows a user to draw up and “lock” the blind or shade in an open, closed or in-between position.
In another aspect, the invention relates to an enclosure or sheathed apparatus coupled with a drive mechanism to encase a pull cord on a blind or shade system, for the purpose of avoiding exposed cords capable of creating a hazardous loop.
In a further aspect, the invention relates to an enclosed pulley system and method of retro-fitting an existing blind or shade with such enclosed pulley system.
In another aspect, a loop cord control enclosure is disclosed to encase a looped cord attached to the shade or blind system at a top part thereof to drive the rolling mechanism that raises and lowers the shade or blinds. The cord is encased to protect any hazardous loops from being exposed, and the cord is engaged internally with one or more drive mechanisms, with at least one attached to a handle to allow an operator to draw the cord and shade/blind up and down. The mechanism is adapted to be retrofitted on an existing shade/blind or originally fit on any of the systems described above. In one embodiment, the loop cord enclosure is attached at the headrail, includes a cord lock disablement mechanism to disable the cord lock to allow the cord and shade/blind to freely open and close without locking, and wherein the cord is encased in the enclosure with at least one drive mechanism coupled to a handle to drive the system.
A further aspect of the invention relates to a drive system for use in conjunction with a lift or pull cord extending from a headrail of an architectural cover, such drive system including: an enclosure adapted to conceal at least a portion of the pull cord; a first drive mechanism in the enclosure, adapted to engage the pull cord, and coupled to a handle mechanism for manual operation; a bracket adapted to connect the enclosure to the headrail of the architectural cover; and a cord lock disablement mechanism for disabling a cord lock of the architectural cover.
In various further implementations, the invention relates to a drive system wherein the first drive mechanism yields a handle to pull cord power ratio of 2:1 by use of at least one pulley or pulley-like apparatus. In an alternative implementation, the cord could instead be attached directly to a handle mechanism directly to effectuate a pull cord power of 1:1. In other implementations, the invention relates to a second drive mechanism adapted to engage the pull cord, wherein the second drive mechanism yields a handle to pull cord power ratio of 4:1. In other implementations, the invention relates to a handle mechanism that further includes a drive mechanism that is either a sleeve adapted to slide along the outside of the enclosure or a slider devise adapted to traverse the interior of the enclosure. In yet other implementations, the invention relates to a handle that further comprises a tension or stop mechanism adapted to secure the handle in position at one or more points along the enclosure.
In the 1:1 pull cord power system, the handle may include a cord lock to secure the cord and a cam lock slider or tension mechanism to secure the handle at any one position along the shaft to raise and lower the blind or shade and keep it at a desired position anywhere in between. In other implementations, the invention relates to a tension or stop mechanism that further comprises at least one release button to allow the handle to be moved along the enclosure, wherein the release button must be pressed to effectuate movement of the handle and corresponding drive mechanism. In still other implementations, the invention relates to a locking mechanism adapted to lock the handle in position at one or more points along the enclosure. In other implementations, the invention relates to a handle that further comprises a counter-weight mechanism adapted to lessen the force required to move the handle. In other implementations, the invention relates to a handle coupled to a spring and adapted to lessen the force required to move the handle. In other implementations, the invention relates to a cord lock disablement mechanism comprising a clamp adapted to fit within an opening in the headrail proximate to where the pull cord extends from the headrail.
A further aspect of the invention relates to a method for retro-fitting an architectural cover pull cord assembly including a pull cord associated with a cord lock and extending from a headrail of the architectural cover, such method comprising: disabling the cord lock; engaging the pull cord extending from the headrail with a drive mechanism coupled to a handle for manual operation; and enclosing the drive mechanism in an enclosure that also conceals at least a portion of the pull cord.
A still further aspect of the invention relates to a drive system for use in conjunction with one or more lift cords extending from a headrail of an architectural cover, said drive system comprising: an enclosure adapted to conceal at least a portion of at least one lift cord; a first drive mechanism in the enclosure, adapted to engage the at least one lift cord, and coupled to a handle mechanism for manual operation; and a bracket adapted to connect the enclosure to the headrail of an architectural cover, wherein the bracket includes a locking mechanism adapted to secure the at least one lift cord in place.
A still further aspect of the invention relates to a drive system for use in conjunction with one or more lift cords extending from a headrail of an architectural cover, said drive system comprising: an enclosure adapted to conceal at least a portion of at least one lift cord and arranged to be secured to a headrail of an architectural opening; a first drive mechanism in the enclosure, adapted to engage the at least one lift cord, and coupled to a handle mechanism for manual operation; a handle coupled to the first drive system; and a counterweight mechanism coupled to the first drive mechanism and adapted to secure the handle in position at one or more locations along the enclosure.
A still further aspect of the invention relates to a drive system for use in conjunction with one or more lift cords extending from a headrail of an architectural cover, said drive system comprising: an enclosure adapted to conceal at least a portion of at least one lift cord and arranged to be secured by a hinge to a headrail of an architectural opening; a first drive mechanism in the enclosure, adapted to engage the at least one lift cord, and coupled to a handle mechanism for manual operation; and wherein the hinge activates a locking mechanism adapted to secure the at least one lift cord in place.
In various further implementations, the invention relates to a method for retro fitting an architectural cover pull cord assembly, comprising securing the pull cord to a fixed position during the engagement with the drive mechanism. In other implementations, the invention relates to a method further comprising connecting a clamp to the headrail, wherein the clamp is adapted to attach the enclosure to the headrail. In other implementations, the invention relates to the method further comprising fastening a cap to the top of the enclosure. In yet other implementations, the invention relates to the method wherein the fastening of the cap secures the pull cord to the enclosure. In other implementations, the invention relates to the method wherein the cap is adapted to connect with the clamp. In still other implementations, the invention relates to the method wherein the cap is adapted to fit within an opening in the headrail proximate to where the pull cord extends from the headrail. In other implementations, the invention relates to the method wherein the cap further includes a cord lock disablement mechanism for disabling the cord lock.
In still further implementations, the invention may include a pull strip for pulling a loose lift or draw cord from an existing assembly into the enclosure for coupling to or engaging with a drive system, particularly in a retro-fit system. Another implementation of the invention relates to a cam apparatus coupled to the handle, wherein rotating the handle also rotates the cam to expand calipers to lock the handle and corresponding shade/blind in place at any desired point. Another aspect includes the cord lock that has an extension to keep the top cap and/or bracket from sliding along the shade/blind headrail, particularly by including a matching gap, hole or space to accommodate the extension of the cord lock.
In still yet a further implementation, the invention has a cord lock mechanism that pinches the cord, a handle that actuates the cord lock mechanism, and a driving mechanism having a cord guide that engages the cord and a slider that slides along the handle to actuate the cord while the cord is enclosed within an enclosure defined by the handle.
Other aspects, features and embodiments of the invention will be more fully apparent from the ensuing disclosure and appended claims.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.
The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the embodiments and illustrate the best mode of practicing the embodiments. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawing figures, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.
The present invention relates to cordless or encased corded drive systems for architectural covers for architectural openings, such as windows, doors or the like.
The term “enclosure” or “housing” as used herein refers to any elongated encasement (wand) of one or more lift cords that may be coupled with one or more drive mechanisms to deter or preclude access to the cords by a human, particularly a child. The enclosure or enclosed drive system may include one or more openings to allow for a handle exterior to the encasement to be coupled to or engaged with the drive mechanism internal to the encasement for driving the pull cords along the encasement.
The term “drive mechanism” as used herein refers to any apparatus capable of engaging one or more lift cords, and optimally adapted to fit within an enclosure or enclosed drive system. In one embodiment, the drive mechanism may allow direct secured attachment of the cord thereto in a 1:1 ratio of drive mechanism to bottom rail of the window covering with which the other end of the pull cords are attached. In a separate embodiment, the drive mechanism may act as a pulley or group of pulleys, wherein the pull cord is secured in the enclosure or enclosed drive system, or within the headrail, to allow a 2:1 or greater ratio of drive mechanism to bottom rail of the window covering. The dive mechanism in various embodiments may be secured to a handle that is exposed exterior to the enclosure or enclosed drive system to allow a user to operate the drive mechanism to raise and lower the window covering.
The term “cord lock disablement mechanism” as used herein refers to any device capable of keeping the cord lock mechanism from raising upon a retraction of the pull cord back into the headrail once the weight of the blinds pulls upon the cords, or may simply include a removal of the cord lock.
The term “drive system” as used herein refers to one or more embodiments of the present invention
The term “architectural cover” includes any cover known to one of skill in the art for an architectural opening, including but not limited to Venetian blinds, roman shades and the like.
The advantages and features of the invention are further illustrated with reference to the following disclosure, which is not to be construed as in any way limiting the scope of the invention, but rather as being illustrative of embodiments of the invention in specific implementations thereof. Reference may be made herein to shades, blinds, and other types of architectural opening covers, but such references are not intended to be limitingly construed as regards the scope of the invention.
Window blinds all generally work in a same or similar fashion. The blind is manipulated by pulling a lift cord or by pulling the covering itself. In the case of a lift cord, strings that connect to the bottom of the window covering are pulled by the cord. The bottom of the window covering moves higher as the cord is pulled and moves lower as the cord is released. The window covering often either folds, rolls or collapses. In applications such as Venetian blinds, the blinds must first be aligned so that they can be lifted and nested in a compacted form.
Venetian blinds contain many individual blinds, called slats, which are generally maintained in an orientation parallel to each other. When the blind is fully lowered, the slats are generally the same distance apart and can all be turned at the same time in the same direction. When the slats are turned so that they are parallel to the window and all touching, most of the light from outside a window is blocked. Turning the slats perpendicular to the window allows light to pass through the open area between adjacent slats.
Turning the slats is accomplished by turning a rod that rotates the slats up or down. Typically three sets of three strings run through each slat; and each set of strings operates in the same way. The middle string raises and lowers the blinds, while the outer two strings form a ladder with a slat on each rung. Turning the rod tilts the slats. Lifting the blinds lets the most amount of light through the window, since all the slats are moved out of the way. The slats generally must first be turned perpendicular to the window, which allows them to collapse against each other when the bottom of the blinds is lifted. When the lift cord is pulled, the blinds rise.
To keep the blinds lifted at any given level, a cog often with teeth (cord lock) sits inside the rail into which the lift cord runs. When the lift cord is pulled towards the cog, usually towards the right when facing the blinds, the cog's teeth catch on the cord. When the lift cord is released, gravity causes the blinds to fall and the lift cord to retract. When the cog is caught on the lift cord, which then gets caught between the rail as well, the cog keeps the lift cord from retracting further and holds the blinds in place. Additionally, there must be some method for the lift cord to remain stationary once the window covering has been raised or lowered to the desired position. In some applications, the cord is wrapped around a hook fastened into the wall.
Traditional blinds have 1-inch slats formed of aluminum, plastic or wood. Shade and blind systems are often supported by a headrail that may include rolled edges at the top, light blocking lip at the lower back side and a curved headrail face similar to the crown of a 1″ slat. Headrails are often open at the top similar to the conformation of a storm gutter. Headrails are often phosphate-treated steel and finished with a polyester primer and topcoat of polyester-baked enamel and measures 0.025″ in thickness. The bottom rail that lifts the blinds from the bottom is generally tubular-shaped and is often phosphate-treated steel with polyester primer and a top coat of polyester-baked enamel and measures 0.025″ in thickness. The slats that form the shaded portion of the blinds are frequently made of cold rolled aluminum alloy. The slats are nominally 1″ wide and available in standard 0.006″ or optional 0.008″ thickness and nominally ½″ wide by 0.006″ thick.
A bracket 18 may be secured to the headrail 1 to support the enclosure 20 and drive system. The bracket may be attached via a top cap 16, coupler 29, or similar means for securing the enclosure 20 to the headrail. The bracket 18 can either be slid on from one end 19 of the headrail 1 adjacent the cord lock mechanism 5 or alternatively clipped on with the use of a bracket 18 that either has one or more hinges 24 (
The handle 14 is attached to the drive mechanism 15 to allow a user to manually operate the opening and closing of the blinds/shades. The handle 14 may include an assembly or mechanism for locking it in place, e.g., locking bars, cams, pegs, etc., together with tension mechanisms for tightening the handle 14 around the enclosure 20 at any specific location along its length. There may be more than one pulley to allow for greater force and less distance being required in the handle 14 to draw up the shades/blinds, where a single pulley allows for a 2:1 ratio of handle to blind distance and force; a two pulley system allows for a 4:1 ratio of handle to blind distance and force; and so on. The drive mechanism 15 may optionally run on inner rails 21 of the enclosure 20.
The pull strip 30 includes some means for engaging the cord 10, whether it is an adhesive, separate cord, or similar apparatus so that it can be pulled into the enclosure 20, around the drive mechanism 27 and out the other side and then detached once the cord 10 is secured to the enclosure. In the 1:1 drive system, the lift or pull cord 10 attached to the pull strip 30 is pulled out at a point adjacent or through the handle 14 and secured therein, either with a cap, clamp, or similar device such as a cord lock mechanism 26 that locks into a top cap 16 after the cord is pulled through. The top cap 16 is attached to the bracket 18 by any one of a number of means or coupler 29, including via a D-ring as shown 29 in
Additionally disclosed is a close pin shaped drive mechanism 27 that has a channel for the lift cord 10 to be pulled through by the pull strip 30, and two semi-flexible extended caliper members 31 that partially encircle an oblong shaped cam type shaft 28 that is attached to the handle 14 so that when the handle 14 is rotated, the cam shaft 28 expands the caliper members 31 lock the drive mechanism 27 in place within the enclosure 20. Such an enclosure 20 could additionally include the inner rails 21 as in the other enclosed embodiments, but are not necessary so long as interior of the enclosure can sufficiently permit the drive mechanism 27 to traverse the length of the enclosure and yet accommodate the pressure of the caliper members 31 as a result of the cam shaft 28 when in a locked position.
A further example of the embodiment in
In
Next, a hinge 168 may couple the handle 148 to the housing 154 which allows the handle 148 to be moved about the hinge 168. Moving the handle 148 about the hinge 168 causes the cord locking member 166 to move within the bottom channel 160 or rotate outside of the bottom channel 160 into a cord release position that allows the cord to be moved. In this embodiment, the cord locking member 166 is moved to a cord release position when the handle 148 is moved about the handle 148 to an angle of approximately 15° or greater. This angle however may vary in other embodiments depending on factors such as the particular dimensions of the cord locking mechanism 146 or regulatory and standardization requirements. As in previous embodiments, the cord is guided within an enclosure 170 defined within the handle 148.
Finally,
The invention has been has been described herein in reference to specific aspects, features and illustrative embodiments of the invention, some of which are numerically disclosed below:
While the invention has been has been described herein in reference to specific aspects, features and illustrative embodiments of the invention, it will be appreciated that the utility of the invention is not thus limited, but rather extends to and encompasses numerous other variations, modifications and alternative embodiments, as will suggest themselves to those of ordinary skill in the field of the present invention, based on the disclosure herein. Any of various elements or features recited herein is contemplated for use with other features or elements disclosed herein, unless specified to the contrary. Correspondingly, the invention as hereinafter claimed is intended to be broadly construed and interpreted, as including all such variations, modifications and alternative embodiments, within its spirit and scope.
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
This application claims the benefit of provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/309,426, entitled “Cordless Blind System and Retro-Fit Method”, filed Mar. 2, 2010, and provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/325,807, entitled “Cordless Blind System and Retro-Fit Method”, filed Apr. 19, 2010, provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/353,653, entitled “Cordless Blind System and Retro-Fit Method”, filed Jun. 10, 2010, and provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/411,336, entitled “Cordless Blind System and Retro-Fit Method”, filed Nov. 8, 2010 the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1962964 | Morrison | Jun 1934 | A |
2226393 | Seeger et al. | Dec 1940 | A |
2410549 | Olson | Nov 1946 | A |
2557877 | Kluson | Jun 1951 | A |
2577046 | Svirsky | Dec 1951 | A |
3022819 | Lampret | Feb 1962 | A |
3633646 | Zilver | Jan 1972 | A |
3795267 | Debs | Mar 1974 | A |
4352386 | Butler et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4685502 | Spangenberg | Aug 1987 | A |
4807683 | Hennequin et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817698 | Rossini et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4865108 | Hennequin et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4865109 | Sherman | Sep 1989 | A |
5070805 | Plante | Dec 1991 | A |
5273096 | Thomsen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5315741 | Dubberke | May 1994 | A |
5365641 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5463797 | Laug et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5465775 | Biba et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5465779 | Rozon | Nov 1995 | A |
5472035 | Biba et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5501262 | Inaba et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5513687 | Tuzmen et al. | May 1996 | A |
5553649 | Chisaka et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5553653 | Rozon | Sep 1996 | A |
5595232 | Benthin | Jan 1997 | A |
5645685 | Furhman | Jul 1997 | A |
5657513 | Takahashi | Aug 1997 | A |
5657807 | Hsu | Aug 1997 | A |
5666699 | Takahashi | Sep 1997 | A |
5671793 | Lee | Sep 1997 | A |
5706876 | Lysyj | Jan 1998 | A |
5709258 | Coccoluto | Jan 1998 | A |
5722478 | Claypool et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5749405 | Huang | May 1998 | A |
5752558 | Lin | May 1998 | A |
5797441 | Benthin | Aug 1998 | A |
5819832 | Huang | Oct 1998 | A |
5850863 | Huang | Dec 1998 | A |
5862850 | Yang | Jan 1999 | A |
5904198 | Huang | May 1999 | A |
6062292 | Bryant | May 2000 | A |
6164291 | Filippone | Dec 2000 | A |
6189595 | Lee | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196293 | Lee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6463987 | Nevins | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477748 | Steiner | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6516860 | Weaver et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6591461 | Salentine et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601633 | Sun et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6644374 | Nien | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6680594 | Collett et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6685592 | Fraczek et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6752194 | Huang | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6792995 | Judkins | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6817399 | Berman et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6948216 | Gaudyn et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7036547 | Cheng et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7117920 | Dekker et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7124801 | Ng et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7204292 | Nien | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7261138 | Judkins et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7337503 | Ashbrook | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7464742 | Oskam et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7597131 | Nien et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7624784 | Anthony et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7669633 | Berger | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7770625 | Lukos | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775254 | Judkins et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7832450 | Brace et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7938161 | Lin | May 2011 | B2 |
8091606 | Nien et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8113261 | Lin | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8205316 | Chu | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8220517 | Kollman et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8225463 | Bourke et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8245360 | Stafford et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8256489 | Berger | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8267144 | Hsu et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8281842 | Lin | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8286686 | Cannaverde | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291959 | Cheng | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8316911 | Cleaver | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8356653 | Fu-Lai et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8365362 | Chou | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8381792 | Perkowitz | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8474509 | Koop | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499815 | Zhang | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8511363 | Lin | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8544525 | Zhu | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8550141 | Ding | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8763675 | Zhu | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20030192654 | Nien | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030192655 | Nien | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030201076 | Nien | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040003900 | Nien | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040108080 | Nien | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040200583 | Nien | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050109468 | Hsu | May 2005 | A1 |
20060157204 | Lin | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060243402 | Chang | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070023149 | Lamars et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070235147 | Zakowski et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080083511 | Hung | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090064473 | Chan | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090071610 | Bossler | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100101741 | Koop | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100126673 | Lin | May 2010 | A1 |
20100126674 | Lin | May 2010 | A1 |
20100126679 | Lin | May 2010 | A1 |
20100193141 | Liang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100212120 | LeBlanc | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100257701 | Gammell et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269984 | Hanley et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100269985 | Hanley et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100294438 | Kirby et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100326608 | Wen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110036512 | Su | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110048652 | Chen | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110056633 | Lin | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110067820 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073260 | Kollman et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110083816 | Chen | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110107557 | Bourke et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110108206 | Hsu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110132554 | Lin | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168339 | Bowen et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110192549 | Wen et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110192550 | Williams | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110192557 | Ling | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110247761 | Lin | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110247762 | Lin | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110247763 | Hu et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110247765 | Lin | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110297336 | Chen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110297337 | Chen | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120067527 | Cheng | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120097342 | Tu | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120097343 | O'Hair | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120267056 | Ko | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120285634 | Zhu | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130068405 | Lava et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2201209 | Sep 1998 | CA |
2785639 | May 2000 | FR |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/034990 mailed Jul. 20, 2012, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,727 mailed Aug. 29, 2012, 19 pages. |
International Search Report for International patent application PCl/US2010/062057 mailed Oct. 27, 2011, 20 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2011/026410 mailed May 3, 2012, 13 pages. |
International Search Report for PCT/US2012/034984 mailed Jul. 13, 2012, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/738,387 mailed May 13, 2013, 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,727, mailed Apr. 10, 2013, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,732, mailed Jun. 25, 2013, 16 pages. |
Partial European Search Report for European patent application 13166761.0 mailed Nov. 20, 2013, 8 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,732 mailed Dec. 18, 2013, 12 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European patent application 13166761.0 mailed Apr. 1, 2014, 11 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,705, mailed May 29, 2014, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,732, mailed May 1, 2014, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,677 mailed Dec. 29, 2014, 10 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,705 mailed Oct. 28, 2014, 9 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/021,181 mailed Oct. 30, 2014, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance and Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,727 mailed Oct. 31, 2014, 9 pages. |
Author Unknown, “On,” Dictionary.com, accessed Jun. 29, 2014, http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/on, Random House, Inc., 1 page. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,677, mailed Jul. 9, 2014, 16 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,727 mailed Jul. 17, 2014, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,705, mailed Aug. 4, 2015, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/021,181, mailed Jun. 24, 2015, 8 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,705, mailed Apr. 7, 2015, 3 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,732 mailed Nov. 19, 2012, 14 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,705 mailed Jan. 14, 2013, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/034984 mailed Nov. 7, 2013, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2012/034990 mailed Nov. 7, 2013, 7 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,705 mailed Jul. 18, 2013, 6 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/738,387 mailed Jul. 10, 2013, 9 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/976,677 mailed Nov. 19, 2013, 10 pages. |
Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,727 mailed Nov. 25, 2013, 10 pages. |
First Examination Report for New Zealand patent application 610332 mailed May 10, 2013, 2 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International patent application PCT/US2010/062057 mailed Jul. 4, 2013, 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110259534 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61309426 | Mar 2010 | US | |
61325807 | Apr 2010 | US | |
61353653 | Jun 2010 | US | |
61411336 | Nov 2010 | US |