Formation coring is well known in the oil and gas industry. In brief, a coring bit at the end of a drill string cuts a columnar core from the bottom of the borehole. The core passes into an inner barrel as it is cut. The inner barrel can then be lifted to transport the core to the surface for laboratory analysis. Characteristics such as formation permeability, porosity, fluid saturations, etc., can usually be determined accurately in this way. Such information is considered to be essential for many companies involved in the search for petroleum, gas, and mineral reserves. Such data may also he useful for construction site evaluation and in quarrying operations.
Inasmuch as possible, cores are preferably obtained in a continuous fashion to preserve the core samples in as pristine a state as possible. Standard lengths for the inner barrel (and hence the core sample) are 30 feet (9 meters), 60 feet (18 meters), and 90 feet (27 meters). If anything goes awry with the coring process, it could be many hours before the problem is discovered. Moreover, the failure to detect and correct such problems in a timely fashion can necessitate days of additional effort to replace the lost core sample material.
Another issue of concern is that many formations are poorly consolidated or are subject to degradation as the core samples are retrieved to the surface. Sandy soils and gas hydrates are just two examples of such formations. As a core sample is retrieved through a borehole, the sample experiences changes in pressure and temperature which can cause hydrates to sublimate and gases to expand. Such phenomena can destroy the fabric of the core sample before the core sample reaches the surface, making porosity, permeability, and saturation measurements infeasible.
The following detailed description should be considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
It is noted that the drawings and detailed description are directed to specific illustrative embodiments of the invention. It should be understood, however, that the illustrated and described embodiments are not intended to limit the disclosure, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the scope of the appended claims.
Accordingly, disclosed herein are core bits and drill bits having integrated optical analyzers. At least some disclosed drill bit embodiments include fixed cutting teeth that form a borehole through a formation as the bit rotates, and at least one impact arrestor that rides in grooves formed by the cutting teeth. An integrated optical analyzer illuminates the formation through a window in the impact arrestor and analyzes light reflected from the formation. Light travels between the window and the optical analyzer via a transmission system that may employ one or more optical fibers. The optical analyzer may employ multiple filters including one or more multivariate optical elements designed to measure spectral characteristics of selected fluids and/or rock types. Position and orientation sensors can be included to enable the optical measurements to be presented as an image log. At least some coring bit embodiments cut a core sample from the formation and perform optical analysis and imaging of the core sample's surface as it is acquired. Axially-spaced windows enable the coring rate to be accurately measured and compared to the bit's rate of motion to verify that the coring process is proceeding satisfactorily.
These and other aspects of the disclosed tools and methods are best understood in terms of a suitable usage context. Accordingly, an illustrative drilling system 100 is shown
The drill bit 114 is just one piece of a bottom-hole assembly that includes one or more drill collars (thick-wailed steel pipe) to provide weight and rigidity to aid the drilling process. Some of these drill collars include logging instruments to gather measurements of various drilling parameters such as position, orientation, weight-on-bit, borehole diameter, etc. The tool orientation may be specified in terms of a tool face angle (a.k.a. rotational or azimuthal orientation), an inclination angle (the slope), and a compass direction, each of which can be derived from measurements by magnetometers, inclinometers, and/or accelerometers, though other sensor types such as inertial sensors and gyroscopes may additionally or alternatively be used to determine position as well as orientation. In one specific embodiment, the tool includes a 3-axis fluxgate magnetometer and a 3-axis accelerometer. As is known in the art, the combination of those two sensor systems enables the measurement of the tool face angle, inclination angle, and compass direction. In some embodiments, the tool face and hole inclination angles are calculated from the accelerometer sensor output. The magnetometer sensor outputs are used to calculate the compass direction.
The drill bit 114 may be a “coring bit” designed to obtain a core sample. (In some alternative embodiments discussed herein, the drill bit 114 may be a fixed cutter bit such as a polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) bit.)
The drill bit 114 of
In the embodiment of
Light from light source 400 is directed into the optical fiber 302A as a light beam 304. The optical fiber 302A conveys the light beam 304 from the analyzer 216 to the window 212. As described above, the window 212 is located on an inner surface of the core bit 202 (see
Some or all of the light beam 304 exiting the optical fiber 302A passes through the window 212 and strikes the core sample 300. A portion of the light 304 striking the core sample 300 reflects from the core sample 300, passes through the window 212, and enters the optical fiber 302B as the light 306. The optical fiber 302B conveys the light 306 reflected from the core sample 300 to the analyzer 216.
As indicated in
The processor 404 also receives the output signal produced by the detector system 402, digitizes it, associates it with a tool face angle and/or a bit depth, and combines it with other measurements for that position to improve measurement quality. For additional measurement accuracy, the processor 404 also controls the light source 400 to regulate its temperature and/or intensity. The processor may further use the measurements to determine the core's characteristics in situ, including for example, rock type, hydrocarbon type, water concentration, porosity, and/or permeability. The processor can further use the measurements to construct an image of the core sample's surface. As the drill bit 114 cuts the core sample 300, the window 212 follows a helical path around the core sample, forming a two dimensional area over which the processor can acquire measurements to image the core.
At least some detector system embodiments employ one or more MOEs to determine whether the spectrum of the reflected light matches the spectral signature of one or more known materials. For example, one MOE may be designed to detect the spectral signature of methane, while another MOE detects the spectral signature of a light hydrocarbon. Yet other MOEs can be used to detect, e.g., long-chain hydrocarbons, water, CO2, sulfur compounds, shale, silicates, or carbonates. The detector can determine intensities of light, passing through an MOE and reflected from an MOE to obtain a measure of how much of the given material is illuminated by the light beam 304. Additional details regarding MOE detectors and their usage can be found in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,911,605 to Myrick et al. entitled “Multivariate Optical Elements for Optical Analysis System,” and in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0265509 by Jones et al entitled “In Situ Optical Computation Fluid Analysis System and Method,” incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In addition to MOEs, the detector can employ filters, dispersion gratings, and/or prisms to measure the spectrum of the reflected light. Such spectral measurements can be used for calibration and performing analysis of those materials for which no MOE has been specifically included.
As previously mentioned, core samples are often obtained to measure formation porosity, permeability, and saturation. Porosity is a measure of how much fluid- or gas-filled volume there is per unit volume of rock. For example, 20% porosity means that 20% of the volume is filled with fluid or gas. Permeability is a measure of resistance to fluid flow, i.e., how easily fluids or gases can propagate through the formation. As a general rule (though not an inviolate one), the more porous the formation, the higher its permeability. Saturation is a measure of what percentage of the formation fluids is water as opposed to hydrocarbon liquids or gases. To measure these values, the MOEs can be designed to detect water and hydrocarbon signatures, but also to detect the spectral signatures of certain types of rock which are known to be more porous or permeable than other types. Accordingly, the processor analyzes the detector output signals to detect concentrations of the various fluid types as well as signs of a spectral match to one of the known rock types. A neural network or other processing technique can then be used to arrive at a quantitative estimate of porosity, permeability, and/or saturation. Even where quantitative estimates are somewhat ambiguous, it should be possible to correlate the optical analyzer measurements with laboratory analysis of the retrieved core. Such a correlation can then be employed as a basis for estimating porosity, permeability, and saturation measurements for those portions of the core sample which have degraded during the retrieval process.
As previously mentioned, the processor 404 may also or alternatively use the output signal produced by the detector system 402 to form a surface image of the core sample 300. Again, as the drill bit 114 is acquiring the core sample 300, the window 212 is turning in a helical path about an outer surface of the core sample 300. The intensity of the light 306 reflected from the core sample 300 and other spectral measurements obtained by the detector system 402 expectedly varies with the texture of the surface of the core sample 300. The processor 404 is configured to track the movement of the drill bit 114 (both the rotational motion about the axis 204 and the linear motion parallel to the axis 204), enabling the processor 404 to associate the intensity measurements produced by the detector system 402 with corresponding positions on the outer surface of the core sample 300. Displaying the intensity measurements as pixels having different levels of gray, or different colors, at positions on a screen corresponding to their positions on the outer surface of the core sample 300 will expectedly create an image of the outer surface of the core sample 300 on the screen.
In the embodiment of
Various forms of light sensors are contemplated including quantum-effect photodetectors (such as photodiodes, photoresistors, phototransistors, photovoltaic cells, and photomuitiplier tubes) and thermal-effect photodectors (such as pyroelectric detectors, Golay cells, thermocouples, thermopiles, and thermistors). Most quantum-effect photodetectors are semiconductor based, e.g., silicon, InGaAs, PbS, and PbSe. One contemplated tool embodiment employs a combined detector made up of a silicon photodiode stacked above an InGaAs photodiode. In tools operating in only the visible and/or near infrared, both quantum-effect photodetectors and thermal-effect photodetectors are suitable. In tools operating across wider spectral ranges, thermal-effect photodetectors are preferred.
The detector system 402 may also include a second light detector (not shown) responsive to light reflected from each of the MOEs 502 when the MOEs 502 pass through the path of the light 306 (422). The second light detector may be coupled to an analog-to-digital converter that produces a value included in the output signal.
A portion of the light produced by the light source 400 enters the optical fiber 302A as the light 304, and another portion of the light produced by the light source 400 enters the optical fiber 302C as light 600. The optical fiber 302A conveys the light 304 to the window 212A, and the optical fiber 302C conveys the light 600 to the window 212B. A portion of the light 304 striking the core sample 300, reflecting from the core sample 300, and passing through the window 212A enters the optical fiber 302B as the light 306. The optical fiber 302B conveys the light 306 reflected from the core sample 300 to the detector system 402A. Similarly, a portion of the light 600 striking the core sample 300, reflecting from the core sample 300, and passing through the window 212B enters the optical fiber 302D as the light 602. The optical fiber 302D conveys the light 306 reflected from the core sample 300 to the detector 402B.
The processor 404 receives the output signals produced by the detector systems 402A and 402B and determines from each an image of the core sample. For example, the intensity of the light 306 and the light 602 reflected from the core sample 300 and reaching the respective detector systems 402A and 402B expectedly varies with the texture of the surface of the core sample 300. In the embodiment of
This “coring rate” can be compared to the bit's rate of motion as measured by inertial sensors or other means. A rate mismatch can be readily detected and used to quickly alert the operators of a potential issue with the coring process. The operators can then act to address the issue and correct any problems before any substantial core losses occur. For example, the operators can vary the rotation rate and the weight-on-bit to restore smooth core cutting, or possibly retrieve the coring assembly to correct any mechanical issues.
The focus of the foregoing discussion has been on coring bits with integrated spectral analyzers. However, the spectral analyzers need not be focused on the core sample, but could alternatively be focused on the floor of the borehole to characterize the formation as soon after it has been exposed as possible. Such a configuration would also be applicable to non-coring, fixed cutter bits.
Accordingly,
Advantageously, the average distance between the impact arrestors and information can be less than 1/32 inch (0.8 millimeter). In the illustrative bit 700, one of these impact arrestors 708 is equipped with a diamond or sapphire window 212. In some embodiments, the window is slightly inset and positioned slightly towards the trailing edge of the impact arrestor to provide some protection against wear. An optical transmission system 214 communicates light through the blade between the window 212 and an optical analyzer. The optical analysis system 210 operates as described above to determine at least one characteristic of the formation at the bottom of the wellbore and/or to form an image of a cylindrical portion of the formation.
Some bit embodiments may locate the window in a junk slot and/or in a flow nozzle to measure the characteristics of the drilling fluid before or after it interacts with the formation. As existing fixed cutter bit may be retrofitted with an optical analysis system 210 by positioning the system in the space formerly reserved for a flow nozzle.
The illustrated impact arrestor 708 includes a conduit 810 extending rough the impact arrestor 708 from the threaded end 800 to the rounded end 802. The window 212 of the optical analysis system 210 is positioned at an end of the conduit 810 in the rounded end 802. The drill bit 700 of
During operation of the drill bit 700 of
Numerous variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art once the above disclosure is fully appreciated. For example, the optical transmission system is described as having one or more optical fibers which could be replaced with waveguides or open channels and an arrangement of mirrors and/or lenses to define the optical path. As another example, the optical analysis system can be adapted to other types of drill bits, such as roller cone drill bits. (To examine the formation, the window can be located in a gauge surface of one of the legs for the roller cones. Drilling fluids can be examined by locating the window in a flow nozzle and/or a junk slot. A comparison of uncontaminated and contaminated fluids may be performed.) It is intended that the claims be interpreted to embrace all such variations and modifications.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
61262895 | Nov 2009 | US | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/038839 | 6/2/2011 | WO | 00 | 11/26/2013 |