The disclosure relates generally to investment casting, and more particularly, to a mold system for forming a casting article for investment casting in which the mechanical integrity of a core (e.g., a ceramic core) can be tested by viscosity manipulation.
Investment casting is used to manufacture a large variety of industrial parts such as turbomachine blades. Investment casting uses a casting article having a sacrificial material pattern to form a ceramic mold for the investment casting. Certain types of casting articles may include a core or insert within the sacrificial material pattern. The core defines an interior structure of the component and becomes a part of the ceramic mold used during the investment casting. The core can include a large variety of intricate features that define an interior structure of the component. Cores can be additively manufactured to allow for rapid prototyping and manufacturing of the cores. The casting article is made by molding a sacrificial material fluid, such as hot wax or a polymer, about the core in a mold that defines the shape of the component surrounding the core. The hardened sacrificial material formed about the core defines the shape of the component for the investment casting.
Each casting article, either individually or in a collection thereof, can be dipped in a slurry and coated with a ceramic to form a ceramic mold for the investment casting. Once the sacrificial material is removed from the ceramic mold, the mold can be used to investment cast the component using a molten metal, e.g., after pre-heating the ceramic mold. Once the molten metal has hardened, the ceramic mold can be removed, and the core can be removed using a leachant. The component can then be finished in a conventional fashion, e.g., heat treating and conventional finishing.
Investment casting is a time consuming and expensive process, especially where the component must be manufactured to precise dimensions. In particular, where precise dimensions are required, formation of the casting article must be very precise. Each mold used to form the casting article can be very costly, and can take an extensive amount of time to manufacture. Consequently, any changes in the core or the component can be very expensive and very time consuming to address. Other challenges that can be costly and time consuming to address are unforeseen weaknesses in the core that cause it to crack or break either during formation of the casting article (e.g., during casting of the sacrificial material about the core), or during the actual investment casting. For example, high pressure sacrificial fluid injected into a mold about the core during casting article formation can crack or break the core, or molten metal injected during the investment casting can crack or break the core. In the former case, the core must be adjusted, and in the latter case, the core and/or the casting article mold may need adjusting. In any event, the changes are costly and time consuming. Currently, there is no mechanism to proactively address the core cracking/breaking challenges.
One approach to reduce time and costs employs additive manufacture of the cores and molds for making the casting article. In particular, additive manufacture allows for more rapid turnaround for design changes in cores and/or the component leading up to the component manufacturing steps. Additive manufacturing (AM) includes a wide variety of processes of producing an object through the successive layering of material rather than the removal of material. Additive manufacturing can create complex geometries without the use of any sort of tools, molds or fixtures, and with little or no waste material. Instead of machining objects from solid billets of material, much of which is cut away and discarded, the only material used in additive manufacturing is what is required to shape the object. Current categories of additive manufacturing may include: binder jetting, material extrusion, powder bed infusion, directed energy deposition, sheet lamination and vat photopolymerization.
Additive manufacturing techniques typically include taking a three-dimensional (3D) computer aided design (CAD) file of the object (e.g., core and/or casting article mold) to be formed, electronically slicing the object into layers (e.g., 18-102 micrometers thick) to create a file with a two-dimensional image of each layer (including vectors, images or coordinates) that can be used to manufacture the object. The 3D CAD file can be created in any known fashion, e.g., computer aided design (CAD) system, a 3D scanner, or digital photography and photogrammetry software. The 3D CAD file may undergo any necessary repair to address errors (e.g., holes, etc.) therein, and may have any CAD format such as a Standard Tessellation Language (STL) file. The 3D CAD file may then be processed by a preparation software system (sometimes referred to as a “slicer”) that interprets the 3D CAD file and electronically slices it such that the object can be built by different types of additive manufacturing systems. The object code file can be any format capable of being used by the desired AM system. For example, the object code file may be an STL file or an additive manufacturing file (AMF), the latter of which is an international standard that is an extensible markup-language (XML) based format designed to allow any CAD software to describe the shape and composition of any three-dimensional object to be fabricated on any AM printer. Depending on the type of additive manufacturing used, material layers are selectively dispensed, sintered, formed, deposited, etc., to create the object per the object code file.
One form of powder bed infusion (referred to herein as metal powder additive manufacturing) may include direct metal laser melting (DMLM) (also referred to as selective laser melting (SLM)). This process is advantageous for forming metal molds for forming casting articles. In metal powder additive manufacturing, metal powder layers are sequentially melted together to form the object. More specifically, fine metal powder layers are sequentially melted after being uniformly distributed using an applicator on a metal powder bed. Each applicator includes an applicator element in the form of a lip, brush, blade or roller made of metal, plastic, ceramic, carbon fibers or rubber that spreads the metal powder evenly over the build platform. The metal powder bed can be moved in a vertical axis. The process takes place in a processing chamber having a precisely controlled atmosphere. Once each layer is created, each two dimensional slice of the object geometry can be fused by selectively melting the metal powder. The melting may be performed by a high powered irradiation beam, such as a 100 Watt ytterbium laser, to fully weld (melt) the metal powder to form a solid metal. The irradiation beam moves or is deflected in the X-Y direction, and has an intensity sufficient to fully weld (melt) the metal powder to form a solid metal. The metal powder bed may be lowered for each subsequent two dimensional layer, and the process repeats until the object is completely formed. In order to create certain larger objects faster, some metal additive manufacturing systems employ a pair of high powered lasers that work together to form an object, like a mold. Other additive manufacturing processes, such as 3D printing, may form layers by dispensing material in layers.
Although additive manufacturing of cores and/or molds for casting article formation has reduced time and cost for adjusting cores and/or molds, challenges remain. Most notably, current mold systems and practices for forming a casting article form one mold regardless of variations in cores. When variations in cores are subtle or when the core has fine or intricate features, it can result in cracked or broken cores and/or imprecise casting articles. Where variations in cores are more profound, e.g., where they share a common structure but also have other structure that varies widely to build different components, each variation of core must have its own mold. Current mold systems used for forming the casting articles are also not sufficiently thermally adjustable to accommodate sacrificial material fluid flow across different cores.
Another challenge with current investment casting is ensuring cores within a casting article can withstand the actual investment casting, i.e., the casting of a molten metal about the core. The current practice includes a trial and error approach in which a casting article is used to perform an investment casting to determine its efficacy. During investment casting, the core may, for example, break, crack or prevent adequate molten metal flow to form the component. In the absence of any mechanism to predict core efficacy, when a problem is identified during investment casting, changes to the core, the metal casting article mold, and/or the casting article formation process must be made, all of which are time consuming and expensive.
A first aspect of the disclosure provides a method for testing a ceramic core used for an investment casting. The method includes: positioning the ceramic core within a mold for receiving a sacrificial material fluid to form a sacrificial material on at least a portion of the ceramic core, the ceramic core having a predefined layout; during casting of the sacrificial material fluid about the ceramic core using the mold, controlling a viscosity of the sacrificial material fluid to simulate an expected viscosity of a molten metal used during a subsequent investment casting using the ceramic core; and evaluating mechanical damage to at least one region of the ceramic core caused by the casting of the sacrificial material fluid.
A second aspect of the disclosure provides a system for system for testing a ceramic core used for an investment casting, including: a mold containing the ceramic core for receiving a sacrificial material fluid to form a sacrificial material on at least a portion of the ceramic core, the ceramic core having a predefined layout; a viscosity control system for controlling a viscosity of the sacrificial material fluid during casting of the sacrificial material fluid about the ceramic core to simulate an expected viscosity of a molten metal used during a subsequent investment casting using the ceramic core; and an evaluation system for evaluating the ceramic core to identify mechanical damage caused by the casting of the sacrificial material fluid on at least one region of the ceramic core.
A third aspect of the disclosure includes a method for testing a ceramic core used for an investment casting, the method including: positioning the ceramic core within a mold for receiving a sacrificial material fluid to form a sacrificial material on at least a portion of the ceramic core, the ceramic core having a predefined layout; and controlling the sacrificial material fluid to simulate an expected viscosity of a molten metal used during a subsequent investment casting using the ceramic core.
The illustrative aspects of the present disclosure are designed to solve the problems herein described and/or other problems not discussed.
These and other features of this disclosure will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the various aspects of the disclosure taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings that depict various embodiments of the disclosure.
It is noted that the drawings of the disclosure are not necessarily to scale. The drawings are intended to depict only typical aspects of the disclosure, and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope of the disclosure. In the drawings, like numbering represents like elements between the drawings.
As indicated above, the disclosure provides a mold system including a mold for receiving therein a selected core chosen from a plurality of varied cores. The mold is configured to form a sacrificial material from a sacrificial material fluid, e.g., wax or a polymer, about a selected core to create a casting article. The casting article including the core and hardened sacrificial fluid material thereabout are used in a conventional manner to form a ceramic mold used for subsequent investment casting of a component. The varied cores may differ in any number of ways such as shape, dimensions, contours, material properties, etc. In one example, each varied core can be close in shape, but have some dimensional variance. In another example, part of a casting article mold may be employed to form a number of components that share a common, first internal structure formed by a common core, but include a number of different, second internal structures formed by a second, different core. That is, the common, first internal structure may be formed by a first, common core, while the different, second internal structures may be made by various second cores. The cores may be made from ceramic or other refractory material (e.g., niobium, molybdenum, tantalum, tungsten or rhenium), metal, metal alloy or combinations thereof.
In order to address the challenge of varied cores, a mold according to embodiments of the disclosure includes a plurality of separable mold portions that are coupleable together to create the mold. In contrast to conventional mold systems, at least one selected separable mold portion of the plurality of separable mold portions includes a set of varied interchangeable versions of the at least one selected separable mold portion. Each varied interchangeable version of the selected separable mold portion is configured to accommodate a different core of the plurality of varied cores. In this fashion, variations in cores, whether simple dimensional differences or widely different internal structures to create different components, can be readily accommodated without forming a complete, expensive metal mold for each core variation. Embodiments of the disclosure also leverage the separable mold portions to provide precise temperature control across the mold to address a number of issues such as certain core areas being prone to cracking or breaking.
Referring to
Mold system 100 includes a mold 110 for receiving therein a selected core chosen from a plurality of varied cores. The variation in cores can take any of a large number of forms. In the example shown in
Mold 110 includes a plurality of separable mold portions 120A-D (collectively “separable mold portions 120”) that are coupleable together to create the mold. As shown in
As shown in
Each separable mold portion 120 may include a metal alloy, an acrylic based material such as but not limited to poly-methyl methylacrylate (PMMA), or a material having glass transition temperature above 70° C. (approximately 160° F.). Where a metal alloy is employed, separable mold portions 120 can be readily manufactured with the afore-mentioned customized structure using, for example, additive manufacturing. More particularly, a metal powder additive manufacturing process may be used to form metal separable mold portions 120. Metal powder additive manufacturing may include, for example, direct metal laser melting (DMLM). It is understood that the general teachings of the disclosure are equally applicable to other forms of metal powder additive manufacturing such as but not limited to direct metal laser sintering (DMLS), selective laser sintering (SLS), electron beam melting (EBM), and perhaps other forms of additive manufacturing. Where separable mold portions 120 include an acrylic-based material or material with glass transition temperature above 70° C., mold portions 120 can be manufactured by, for example, stereolithography or 3D printing (e.g., using stereolithography resins). Other processes may also be employed to manufacture separable mold portions 120, e.g., casting and machining.
Certain mold portion(s) 120A-D may also include a core positioner receiver 144 therein. Each core positioner receiver 144 is configured to receive a core positioner 146 (
Returning to
Referring to
Mold system 100 also provides mechanisms for controlling a temperature of mold 110. In particular, separable mold portions 120 provide for more precise thermal control than conventional systems. Temperature control of mold 110, and in particular each separable mold portion 120 or a zone including a certain separable mold portion 120 may be desired for a number of reasons. For example, temperature control allows one to: maintain a desired viscosity and/or temperature of sacrificial material fluid, maintain a desired temperature of a core 112, protect mold 110 from overheating damage, and preheat mold 110 to ensure proper casting. Further, certain sacrificial material fluids, e.g., wax or certain polymers, may require a certain temperature to create a fluid form and/or maintain an appropriate temperature for creating casting article 102. As will be described, the temperature control can be customized and controlled in a number of ways according to embodiments of the disclosure.
In one embodiment, as shown for example in
Each varied interchangeable version of the at least one selected separable mold portion 120A-D may include a mold thermal conducting conduit 164 different than the mold thermal conducting conduit in the other separable mold portions of the set. In this manner, each version of a selected separable mold portion 120A-D can have its respective thermal conducting path customized for the situation for which the mold portion is built. For example, as shown in
Mold thermal fluid controller 180 can include any now known or later developed temperature controlled thermal fluid temperature control system for creating any number of temperature controlled thermal fluid 176 flows, each at a specific temperature, e.g., a multi-tiered heat exchanger such as Thermolater TW Series water temperature control unit. Any necessary pumps to move temperature controlled temperature controlled thermal fluid 176 may also be provided. Mold thermal conducting conduits 164 can be arranged to control the temperature of a particular separable mold portion 120 and/or a sacrificial material fluid input zone 190. With regard to the zones, one or more mold thermal conducting conduit(s) 164 may act to control a temperature of a defined sacrificial material fluid input zone 190A-C (3 shown). Each zone 190A-C is configured to receive a sacrificial material fluid to form a sacrificial material about the core at a particular temperature. Each zone 190A-C can be defined by, for example, any desired area and/or volume of mold 110, any area and/or volume of the void to be filled by sacrificial material 130 fluid, and/or any area and/or volume of core 112. Each separable mold portion 120A-C may include at least one sacrificial material fluid input zone 190A-C, i.e., zones do not necessarily match mold portions.
At least one separable mold portion 120 can have temperature controlled thermal fluid 176 passing therethrough having a temperature different than another separable mold portion 120. Similarly, each zone 190A-C can have temperature controlled thermal fluid 176 passing through or near in such a way as to have a temperature different than another zone. In any event, a mold thermal conducting conduit 164 may control a temperature of at least the sacrificial material 130 fluid within at least one respective separable mold portion 120, and perhaps other areas such as those downstream of the mold portion in which the conduit exists. Each zone 190A-C, for example, can have a temperature controlled therein to control, for example, the viscosity and other flow characteristics of sacrificial material 130 fluid in the respective zone to accommodate any casting/injection issues specific to that zone including but not limited to: difficult wetting/flow conditions, and/or core 112 issues. For example, the temperature of a zone 190A-C can be controlled based on a characteristic of core 112, e.g., fragility, difficult wetting, etc., in the respective zone. In this manner, core 112 damage and sacrificial material fluid flow can be readily controlled, and quality casting article 102 formation can be attained. Further, certain mold 110 materials may require using sacrificial material fluid having a certain maximum temperature that does not damage the mold, e.g., a PMMA mold. Each zone 190A-C temperature can also be controlled to prevent mold damage by sacrificial material fluid overheating. The temperature of each mold portion 120 can be similarly controlled.
Turning to
In addition, mold system 200 may also include a sacrificial material fluid heating system 202 to control the temperature and viscosity of sacrificial material 130 fluid, and indirectly control the temperature of mold portions 120. Sacrificial material heating system 20 can operate alone or in addition to mold thermal fluid controller 180 (latter shown in simpler fashion in
Sacrificial material fluid heating system 202 may include any now known or later developed sacrificial material heating unit(s) for creating a sacrificial material fluid flows 286A-C at a specific temperature, e.g., a multi-tiered heat exchanger, or a series of heating units. In the latter example, for use with wax, heating system 202 may include a series of Dura-Bull air pressure wax injectors, each creating fluid wax at a different temperature. In any event, sacrificial material fluid heating system 202 may be configured to heat a plurality of flows 286A-C of the sacrificial material fluid to different temperatures. That is, each sacrificial material fluid flow 286A-C may have a different temperature as controlled by sacrificial material fluid heating system 202. In this manner, one sacrificial material fluid input zone 290A may receive one of the plurality of flows of the sacrificial material fluid flows 286A at a first temperature, and another sacrificial material fluid input zone 290B receives another sacrificial material fluid flow 286B at a second, different temperature. Alternatively, one separable mold portion 120C may receive one of sacrificial material fluid flow 286A at a first temperature, and another separable mold portion 120B may receive another sacrificial material fluid flow 286C at a second, different temperature. The temperatures can be selected to address any of the afore-mentioned reasons for having temperature control.
In operation, as shown in the flow diagram of
As described, as shown in process P2, mold 110 may be formed about a selected core 112 of the plurality of varied cores 112 by coupling two or more mold-selected separable mold portions 120 together. The mold-selected separable mold portions, i.e., those from the set(s) selected to be used in mold 110, are selected to accommodate the selected core of the plurality of varied cores. Each separable mold portion 120 may include a mold thermal conducting conduit 164 therein configured to conduct temperature controlled thermal fluid 176 (
Once mold 110 is formed, in process P3, casting article 102 can be casted by introducing a sacrificial material 130 fluid into the mold and about the selected core. Process P3 may further include controlling a temperature of a plurality of sacrificial material fluid input zones 190A-C (
Once casting article 102 is formed, mold 110 may be removed in any now known or later developed fashion, e.g., by unfastening mold portions 120. As described, casting article 102 can be used in any now known or later developed investment casting process.
Mold systems 100, 200 as described herein provide a number of advantages compared to conventional systems. Mold systems 100, 200 allow for lower pressure sacrificial material fluid injection, e.g., 34.5 kiloPascals (kPa) to 344.5kPa (5-50 psi), compared to conventional systems, e.g., at or above 13.8 megaPascals (MPa). Mold systems 100, 200 also allow for injection at optimized sacrificial material fluid temperatures and viscosities since the molds have their own respective temperature control. The optimized sacrificial fluid temperatures and viscosities and injection pressures prevent mold 110, 210 and core 112 damage due to thermal and pressure stresses. Mold systems 100, 200 also provides modular and customizable molds to handle a variety of cores. Separable mold portions 120 can be reused, as necessary. Mold thermal fluid controller 180 can be used to pre-heat molds 110, 210 directly and cores 112 indirectly, which aids in improving the quality of casting article 102. Mold thermal fluid controller 180 also allows for precise temperature control of defined zones and/or separable mold portions to address injection issues specific to that zone, mold portion and/or the core portion located therein. Similarly, sacrificial material fluid heating system 202 allows for precise temperature control of sacrificial material fluid uses for a defined zones and/or separable mold portions to address injection issues specific to that zone, mold portion and/or the core portion located therein. The teachings of the disclosure can be used across wide variety of mold materials, and mold manufacturing processes. Fleets of molds can be created to handle wide variations in cores and/or different components to be built. The ability to use additive manufacturing for both mold 110, 210 and cores 112 provides significant time-savings and cost savings compared to conventional casting processes. Further, additive manufacturing allows for issues discovered during formation of the casting article, e.g., core cracking, to be more quickly remedied, and also allows for the issues to be addressed earlier in the overall process, i.e., during the casting article formation rather than during the investment casting process.
Embodiments of the disclosure further include mechanical integrity premature ceramic core assessment of ceramic cores used during the injection process and casting applications. Potential mechanical damage (e.g., cracking, breaking, or failing) of ceramic cores during a pour of molten metal and single crystal furnace solidification process can be predicted. This allows, for example, adjustment of the configuration (e.g., shape, size, etc.) of ceramic cores very early in the investment casting process to mitigate failure of ceramic cores during later stage molten metal pouring.
A process is disclosed in which ceramic cores are tested at a very early stage of an investment casting process. Instead of performing all of the design steps up to molten metal pouring before determining the robustness of ceramic cores, the testing process disclosed herein uses a sacrificial fluid material to simulate molten metal stresses on ceramic cores. The viscosity of the sacrificial fluid material is controlled using temperature and/or pressure to match the viscosity of the molten metal. This saves a tremendous amount of time and money because faulty ceramic cores are identified early in the casting process instead of after the pouring of molten metal.
As depicted in
In some cases, during the pouring of the molten alloy into a ceramic mold (e.g., process A7), the ceramic core may break, crack, or be damaged in some other way. This damage (YES, A10) may be discovered, for example, during the inspection of the cast part at process A9. When a problem with the ceramic core is identified, changes (process A11) to the ceramic core may be required, which is time consuming and expensive. Flow then passes back to A2, where another wax pattern is created using the redesigned ceramic core, and the investment casting process is again carried out using the redesigned ceramic core. Further trial and error redesign may be required if the new ceramic core is found to be defective (YES, A10). Damage to the ceramic core may require a redesign of the mold 110.
According to embodiments of the disclosure, as depicted in
According to embodiments, the ability to manipulate the viscosity and flow characteristics of the sacrificial material 130 fluid in one or more separable mold portions 120 of the mold 110 may be exploited to simulate molten metal stresses on one or more portions of the ceramic core 112. This allows the ceramic core 112 to be tested very early in the investment casting process, without actually requiring a molten metal pour.
As previously described, the mold 110 includes a plurality of separable mold portions 120 (e.g., mold portions 120A-D,
The viscosity of the sacrificial material 130 fluid can be controlled to mimic the expected viscosity of the molten metal used in the investment casting process. For example, the sacrificial material heating system 202 (
The process B1 for testing the ceramic core 112 according to embodiments is depicted in greater detail in
At B1-2, the sacrificial material 130 fluid is heated (e.g., by the sacrificial material heating system 202) to a predetermined temperature (T) at which the sacrificial material 130 fluid has a viscosity (VISC) corresponding to the viscosity of a given molten metal alloy. At B1-3, the core 110 is filled with the sacrificial material 130 fluid at the viscosity (VISC) to create a wax pattern about the ceramic core 112. At B1-4, the wax pattern is de-waxed to reveal the underlying ceramic core 112. At B1-5, the ceramic core 112 is examined to determine if the flow of the sacrificial material 130 fluid at the viscosity (VISC) into the mold 110 caused any mechanical damage to the ceramic core 112. If there is damage to the ceramic core (YES, B2), the ceramic core may be redesigned at B3 and subsequently retested at B1. Feedback regarding any ceramic core damage discovered during the examination process (B1-5) may be provided to the ceramic core design team, which can use the feedback to redesign the ceramic core to prevent such damage.
If it is determined that the ceramic core is not defective (NO, B2), flow passes to A2 and a wax pattern is created. The ceramic core testing process (B1) may be repeated using sacrificial material 130 fluid at one or more additional viscosities to determine the effect such viscosities may have on a ceramic core 112. The same ceramic core 112, if found non defective (NO, B2), may be retested using a sacrificial material 130 fluid at one or more additional viscosities to determine the effect such viscosities may have on that ceramic core 112.
In the above description of process B1 for testing the ceramic core 112, the sacrificial material 130 fluid may have the same viscosity throughout the mold 110. However, according to embodiments, the viscosity of the sacrificial material 130 fluid in one or more of the separable mold portions 120 may be adjusted under control of the mold thermal fluid controller 180 (
Referring again to
Different viscosities of sacrificial material 130 fluid may also be provided to one or more of the separable mold portions 120 of the mold 110, as described in greater detail with regard to
The foregoing drawings show some of the processing associated according to several embodiments of this disclosure. In this regard, each block within a flow diagram of the drawings represents a process associated with embodiments of the method described. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the acts noted in the drawings or blocks may occur out of the order noted in the figure or, for example, may in fact be executed substantially concurrently or in the reverse order, depending upon the act involved. Also, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that additional blocks that describe the processing may be added.
The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the disclosure. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. “Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur, and that the description includes instances where the event occurs and instances where it does not.
Approximating language, as used herein throughout the specification and claims, may be applied to modify any quantitative representation that could permissibly vary without resulting in a change in the basic function to which it is related. Accordingly, a value modified by a term or terms, such as “about,” “approximately” and “substantially,” are not to be limited to the precise value specified. In at least some instances, the approximating language may correspond to the precision of an instrument for measuring the value. Here and throughout the specification and claims, range limitations may be combined and/or interchanged, such ranges are identified and include all the sub-ranges contained therein unless context or language indicates otherwise. “Approximately” as applied to a particular value of a range applies to both values, and unless otherwise dependent on the precision of the instrument measuring the value, may indicate +/−10% of the stated value(s).
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present disclosure has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the disclosure in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the disclosure. The embodiment was chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the disclosure and the practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the disclosure for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
The application is related to U.S. application Ser. No. ______, GE docket number 320860-1, GE docket number 321119-1, and GE docket number 321121-1.