Patent Application
20050209675
The present invention relates generally to medical device and methods. More particularly, it relates to delivery systems for implanting prostheses within hollow body organs and vessels or other luminal anatomy.
Implants such as stents and occlusive coils have been used in patients for a wide variety of reasons. One of the most common “stenting” procedures is carried out in connection with the treatment of atherosclerosis, a disease which results in a narrowing and stenosis of body lumens, such as the coronary arteries. At the site of the narrowing (i.e., the site of a lesion) a balloon is typically dilatated in an angioplasty procedure to open the vessel. A stent is set in apposition to the interior surface of the lumen in order to help maintain an open passageway. This result may be effected by means of scaffolding support alone or by virtue of the presence of one or more drugs carried by the stent aiding in the prevention of restenosis.
Various stent designs have been developed and used clinically, but self-expandable and balloon-expandable stent systems and their related deployment techniques are now predominant. Examples of self-expandable stents currently in use are the Magic WALLSTENT® stents and Radius stents (Boston Scientific). A commonly used balloon-expandable stent is the Cypher® stent (Cordis Corporation). Additional self-expanding stent background is presented in: “An Overview of Superelastic Stent Design,” Min. Invas Ther & Allied Technol 2002: 9 (3/4) 235-246, “A Survey of Stent Designs,” Min. Invas Ther & Allied Technol 2002: 11 (4) 137-147, and “Coronary Artery Stents: Design and Biologic Considerations,” Cardiology Special Edition, 2003: 9 (2) 9-14, “Clinical and Angiographic Efficacy of a Self-Expanding Stent” Am Heart J 2003: 145 (5) 868-874.
Because self-expanding prosthetic devices need not be set over a balloon (as with balloon-expandable designs), self-expanding stent delivery systems can be designed to a relatively smaller outer diameter than their balloon-expandable counterparts. As such, self-expanding stents may be better suited to reach the smallest vasculature or achieve access in more difficult cases.
To realize such benefits, however, there continues to be a need in developing improved delivery systems. Problems encountered with known systems include drawbacks ranging from failure to provide means to enable precise placement of the subject prosthetic, to a lack of space efficiency in delivery system design. Poor placement hampers stent efficacy. Space inefficiency in system design prohibits scaling the systems to sizes as small as necessary to enable difficult access or small-vessel procedures (i.e., in tortuous vasculature or vessels having a diameter less than 3 mm, even less than 2 mm).
One known stent delivery system comprises a simple sheath set over a pusher in abutment with a stent. An example of such a system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,580,568. Though elegant in design, the system fails to offer desired functional characteristics. Particularly, such a system is prone to misuse when a physician who in not intimately familiar with the hardware retracts or pushes the wrong one of the stent-abutting member or the sheath in an effort to free the stent. Dedicated handle systems have been developed to address this problem. Examples are provide in WO 99/04728, WO 00/18330, WO 98/23241, EP-A-747021, DE-A-44 20142 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,433,723.
Even when not misused, simple sheath system present issues with precise stent placement stemming from the fact that the sheath cannot be locked-down at the proximal end of an access catheter (e.g., at a hemostatic valve) while deploying the stent. As a result, it is difficult to prevent inadvertent axial movement of the stent. Because the sheath cannot be held onto, stent deployment requires that a user hold the pusher member (or handle attached thereto) steady while withdrawing the sheath in order to avoid pushing the stent forward within the vessel thereby complicating stent placement or producing “skid-marks” and even vessel perforation.
The system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,534,007 assigned to SciMed Life Systems, Inc. offers an alternative to a simple-sheath type system for deploying self-expandable stents. The proximal end of the noted system can be locked-down to possibly aid in reducing stent movement during restraint withdrawal. Yet, the system requires a collapsible, bellows-type sheath portioned between the stationary proximal sleeve and the moveable distal restraint. Furthermore, the system is deployed over a guidewire. Because of the large “over-the-guidewire size” and increasing size of the device resulting by compression of the bellows, the device is not believed capable of being able to access or be withdrawn from the smallest and/or most tortuous anatomy.
Accordingly, there exists a need for a system to better enable precise stent placement than a simple sheath system, but offering improved space efficiency over other know self-expanding stent delivery systems such as that in the '007 patent. Those with skill in the art may also appreciate further advantages or benefits of the invention.
The present invention offers a highly-advantageous system for precise stent placement, allowing a user to conveniently lock-down the system if desired and deliver a stent thus set in place. The system includes a stent and a delivery guide for carrying the stent to a treatment site and releasing the stent at that point. To facilitate the lock-down function, the delivery guide is configured such that it is actuated by a member interior to an outer sleeve onto which the hemostatic valve of a catheter (e.g., a microcatheter or balloon catheter) can be collapsed. The inner member may be a core member (i.e., filling the center of or being coaxial with the sleeve) or one of a number of inner members.
By actuating the interior member (e.g., by withdrawing the same or by a physical shortening, such as by a heat-activated shape memory plastic or alloy wire), a restraint holding a stent over a separate, distal extension wire is moved off of the stent it holds in a collapsed configuration. Accordingly, simple withdrawal of the inner member will deploy the stent. Yet, a more user-friendly handle could be provided. In any case, the inventive system preferably offers a simple and space efficient proximal shaft that consists of an outer tubular sleeve member and a corewire therein. Such a system is easily fit to a manipulator and/or directly manipulated by a surgeon.
In the present invention, an implant delivery system is provided in which a stent or other radially expandable implant is held in a collapsed position over a wire extending from a sleeve receiving the core member, where the extension wire preferably includes an atraumatic tip. As opposed to a system in which a simple full-length sheath is employed, the restraint only covers the implant or the implant and some distal portion of the delivery device proximal to the stent. The length of the restraint may be selected according to the teachings of U.S. Patent Application Attorney Docket No. CRMD-007, entitled “Sliding Restraint Stent Delivery Systems” filed on even date herewith and incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The stent or other such implant as may be employed is preferably self-expanding upon release of the restraint. Thus, full or complete placement of the stent can be achieved upon its release from the delivery device.
Minimization of delivery device crossing profile and providing internal actuation of a device with a fixed distal tip is accomplished by a cooperative relationship between the inner and outer members of the device in which one or more bridge segments associated with the restraint provides a “cross-over” from a system outer diameter (that of the restraint located exterior of the stent) to a diameter within the sleeve (with attachment to the inner/core member).
The bridge section or segment is sized to allow retracting the restraint fully off of the stent without the sleeve interfering with simple axial movement of the restraint. The bridge may be sized so that a distal end of the sleeve stops restraint withdrawal upon release of the stent. Alternatively, the system may be configured to allow further withdrawal of the restraint.
The bridge segment may be provided in any of a number of manners. It may be a separate element attached to both the restraint and the inner/core member. Alternatively it may be an integral extension of the restraint, extending distally for connection to the inner member of the delivery system. Still further, the bridging element may be an extension from or an extension of the inner member of the device. Where the inner member is a “corewire”, the extension will likely neck-down or be offset to accomplish the bridge's cross-over or pass-through function.
One-sided, two-sided or three-sided bridge and sleeve/extension member connection approaches are contemplated as well. A one-sided approach may provided for the smallest possible overall delivery guide dimensions. Yet, multiple bridge member (even exceeding three) approaches may offer advantages in terms of balancing actuation loads and providing consistent flexibility performance. Another approach to achieve such balancing uses a single member, where that member is a tube or other hollow structure surrounding a structurally significant portion of the extension member.
As for the connection between the stent-carrying extension and proximal sleeve, a non-exhaustive set of options are detailed in the figures below. Alternative approaches may be employed in producing systems according to the present invention. In the broadest sense of the invention, the “connection” between the stent-carrying extension portion of the device and the proximal sleeve is intended to be generic. For instance, it may be in the form of a transition between differently shaped portions of a unitary piece of material. That is to say, the extension member/wire and sleeve members may be integral. Still, they will have a “connection” as intended herein between them.
The connection between the extension member carrying the stent and the sleeve may be made at the distal end of the sleeve. Alternatively, the connection may be set at a distal portion of the sleeve that is proximal to its end. In which case, the bridge sections and restraint length are set so as to cover, conceal or overlay the bridge sections within the sleeve.
Of course, the sleeve portion distal of the connection may be in the form of another tubular member attached at a proximal sleeve section. This approach may be desired for reason of using a thinner walled polymer distal sleeve section overlaying the bridge section(s) and even part of the restraint, while employing a metal hypotube for the proximal sleeve section where torquability and pushability requirements predominate.
A sleeve covering the bridge portion(s) can be used to help maintain alignment of components during navigation of anatomy. Indeed, if sufficiently robust, a distal sleeve section covering or a protective coil surrounding or overriding at least a portion of the extension member and bridge segment(s) can avoid a “cord effect” of the bridge(s) separating from alignment with the extension member upon system actuation to release a stent.
Other means of maintaining alignment of features are provided in other variations of the invention. In the variation of the invention noted above, the bridge segment is provided by a tubular member. By virtue of its geometry alone, it remains centered about the extension wire upon which it rides.
In another variation of the invention especially adapted to maintain element alignment, the bridge segment is optionally an extension of the core wire crossing from the inside of the sleeve to outside of it to the restraint. The bridge member may be tapered, smaller in diameter than the core wire or substantially the same in diameter. As in the variation of the invention above, in this variation, the hollow geometry of one of the system components ensures the members stay together during navigation and actuation irrespective of conditions.
Where the extension from the sleeve includes a tubular member, it also includes a wire extending from the distal end of the tubular extension member. The stent is then carried upon the reduced diameter wire extension. With the stent carried upon such a relatively small diameter body, the maximum system diameter can be minimized.
The present invention also includes a variation in which the bridge segment is nothing more than a direct connection (such as at least one pin, bent-over section of the core wire, a glue or solder joint, etc.) between the core member and the restraint. In this variation of the invention, for example, it may the case that no tubular extension member is provided, but that instead the distal end of the sleeve is slotted. The extension member will then simply take the form of a wire connected distal to the slotted region through which the bride section slides to withdraw the restraint. Other variations are possible combining various aspects of the structures described above.
In any case, a stent stop or blocker surface is generally provided to abut the stent to hold it stationary within or relative to the delivery device upon withdrawal of the restraint. This surface may be provided in connection with the sleeve and/or the extension section. The stent stop or blocker may simply be provided by a distal portion of the proximal outer member/sleeve. Alternatively, the blocker may be in the form of a ground-in shoulder section or a ring or band, etc. connected to the extension member. Again, other possibilities exist as well, including forming the member of a radiopaque material or providing multiple interface or blocker surface features formed in the extension member under the stent. Such approaches in providing stent stop or blocker surface(s) are known in the art as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,768,507; 5,484,444 and 6,302,893 as are releasable stent-holding adhesive surfaces as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,026,377, and polymers in which to embed or grip a stent as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,042,589 and 6,607,551—each patent incorporated by reference herein for its disclosure of such stent-stabilizing features.
The form of the restraint is also highly variable. In a most basic variation, it is a simple tubular member. When this form of restraint is slid axially off of the stent, the device will experience no change in its distal diameter. However, in another variation of the invention, the restraint may be adapted to collapse radially. A full discussion of such diameter adaptive restraint technology (DART™) systems is provided in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/792,657, entitled “Stent Delivery System with Diameter Adaptive Restraint,” filed on Mar. 2, 2004 and incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Still further, the restraint may comprise one or more members wrapped or otherwise disposed about the stent. In such a multi-member restraint approach, the portions may be interconnected, interwoven or separate from one another.
Delivery systems and guides according to the present invention are amenable to scaling to sizes not previously achieved. Consequently, the systems may be used in lieu of a guidewire, such as in a “guidewireless” delivery approach. Still further, rather than providing an “over-the-wire” delivery system as referenced above, the present systems may be regarded as “on-the-wire” delivery systems, since—in effect—delivery is accomplished by a system in which the stent is carried by a delivery guide occupying a catheter lumen that would commonly otherwise be used to accommodate a guidewire.
Whether used in such a manner or otherwise (such as by configuring the subject systems for treating larger peripheral vessels), the present invention includes systems comprising any combination of the features described herein. Methodology described in association with the devices disclosed also forms part of the invention. Such methodology may include that associated with completing an angioplasty, bridging an aneurysm, deploying radially-expandable anchors for pacing leads or an embolic filter, or placement of a prosthesis within neurovasculature, an organ selected from the kidney and liver, within reproductive anatomy such as selected vasdeferens and fallopian tubes or other applications.
The term “stent” as used herein refers to any coronary artery stent, other vascular prosthesis, or other radially expanding or expandable prosthesis or scaffold-type implant suitable for the noted treatments or otherwise. Exemplary structures include wire mesh or lattice patterns and coils, though others may be employed in the present invention.
A “self expanding” stent is a scaffold-type structure (serving any of a number of purposes) that expands by its own action from a reduced-diameter configuration to an increased-diameter configuration. The “diameter” need not be circular—it may be of any open configuration. Self-expanding materials may be so by virtue of simple elastic behavior, superelastic behavior, a shape memory effect (i.e., heat-activated transformation from martinsite to austenite) or some other manner. Since the stents will remain in the subject's body, the material should be biocompatible or at least be amenable to biocompatible coating. As such, suitable self expanding stent materials for use in the subject invention include Nickel-Titanium (i.e., NiTi) alloy (e.g., NITINOL) and various other alloys or polymers.
A “wire” as used herein generally comprises a common metallic member. However, the wire may be coated or covered by a polymeric material (e.g., with a lubricious material such as TEFLON®, i.e. PolyTetraFlouroEthelyne—PTFE) or otherwise. Still further, the “wire” may be a hybrid structure with metal and a polymeric material (e.g. Vectran™, Spectra™, Nylon, etc.) or composite material (e.g., carbon fiber in a polymer matrix). The wire may be a filament, bundle of filaments, cable, ribbon or in some other form. It is generally not hollow.
A “core” wire as referred to herein is a member internal to an outer member, such as a tubular member. As a core wire, the member, fills or at least substantially fills all of the interior space of the tubular member.
A “hypotube” or “hypotubing” as referred to herein means small diameter tubing in the size range discussed below, generally with a thin wall. The hypotube may specifically be hypodermic needle tubing. Alternatively, it may be wound or braided cable tubing, such as provided by Asahi Intec Co., Ltd or otherwise. As with the “wire” discussed above, the material defining the hypotube may be metallic, polymeric or a hybrid of metallic and polymeric or composite material.
A “sleeve” as referred to herein may be made of such hypotubing or otherwise. The sleeve may be a tubular member, or it may have longitudinal opening(s). It is an outer member, able to slidingly receive and hold at least a portion of an inner member.
An “atraumatic tip” may comprise a plurality of spring coils attached to a tapered wire section. At a distal end the coils typically terminate with a bulb or ball that is often made of solder. In such a construction, the coils and/or solder are often platinum alloy or another radiopaque material. The coils may also be platinum, or be of another material. In the present invention, the wire section to which the coils are attached may be tapered, but need not be tapered. In addition, alternate structures are possible. For instance, molding or dip-coating with a polymer may be employed. In one example, the atraumatic tip may comprise a molded tantalum-loaded 35 durometer Pebax™ tip. However constructed, the atraumatic tip may be straight or curved, the latter configuration possibly assisting in directing or steering the delivery guide to a desired intravascular location.
To “connect” or to have or make a “connection” between parts refers to fusing, bonding, welding (by resistance, laser, chemically, ultrasonically, etc), gluing, pinning, crimping, clamping or otherwise mechanically or physically joining, attaching or holding components together (permanently or temporarily).
Each of the figures diagrammatically illustrates aspects of the invention. Of these:
Variation of the invention from the embodiments pictured is, of course, contemplated.
Before the present invention is described in detail, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particular variations set forth and may, of course, vary. Various changes may be made to the invention described and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, material, composition of matter, process, process act(s) or step(s), to the objective(s), spirit or scope of the present invention. All such modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims made herein.
Methods recited herein may be carried out in any order of the recited events which is logically possible, as well as the recited order of events. Furthermore, where a range of values is provided, it is understood that every intervening value, between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the invention. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein.
All existing subject matter mentioned herein (e.g., publications, patents, patent applications and hardware) is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety except insofar as the subject matter may conflict with that of the present invention (in which case what is present herein shall prevail). The referenced items are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such material by virtue of prior invention.
Reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are plural of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
Turning now to
Features of the present invention are uniquely suited for a system able to reach small vessels (though use of the subject systems s not limited to such a setting.) By “small” coronary vessels, it is meant vessels having a inside diameter between about 1.5 or 2 and about 3 mm in diameter. These vessels include, but are not limited to, the Posterior Descending Artery (PDA), Obtuse Marginal (OM) and small diagonals. Conditions such as diffuse stenosis and diabetes produce conditions that represent other access and delivery challenges which can be addressed with a delivery system according to the present invention. Other extended treatment areas addressable with the subject systems include vessel bifurcations, chronic total occlusions (CTOs), and prevention procedures (such as in stenting vulnerable plaque).
Assuming a means of delivering one or more appropriately-sized stents, it may be preferred to use a drug eluting stent in such an application to aid in preventing restenosis. However, bare-metal stents may be employed in the present invention. The present invention is advantageously employed with self-expanding stents. However, the teachings herein may be adapted for application in the context of balloon-expandable stents.
In any case, features of the present invention are provided in order to hold an implant (e.g., a stent) to be delivered in an access or deployment configuration, after which, the implant assumes its deployed or expanded configuration. Hold-down features may restrain a stent under compressive forces, whereupon release, the stent “springs” open. Alternatively, the stent (or other implant) may simply be secured to the delivery member, where some other mechanism is used to open the stent (e.g., ceasing a flow of chilled saline, thereby allowing a shape memory devices (e.g., NiTi) to warm in order that a material phase change from martinsite to austenite will cause the stent to open).
While some might argue that the particular role and optimal usage of self expanding stents has yet to be defined, they offer an inherent advantage over balloon expandable stents. The latter type of devices produce “skid mark” trauma (at least when delivered uncovered upon a balloon) and are associated with a higher risk of end dissection or barotraumas caused at least in part by high balloon pressures and related forces when deforming a balloon-expandable stent for deployment.
Yet, with an appropriate deployment system, self-expanding stents may offer one or more of the following advantages over balloon-expandable models: 1) greater accessibility to distal, tortuous and small vessel anatomy—by virtue of decreasing crossing diameter and increasing compliance relative to a system requiring a deployment balloon, 2) sequentially controlled or “gentle” device deployment, 3) use with low balloon pre-dilatation (if desirable) to reduce barotraumas, 4) strut thickness reduction in some cases reducing the amount of “foreign body” material in a vessel or other body conduit, 5) opportunity to treat neurovasculature—due to smaller crossing diameters and/or gentle delivery options, 6) the ability to easily scale-up a successful treatment system to treat larger vessels or vice versa, 7) a decrease in system complexity, offering potential advantages both in terms of reliability and system cost, 8) reducing the effects of intimal hyperplasia, and 9) conforming to tapering anatomy—without imparting complimentary geometry to the stent (though this option exists as well).
At least some of these noted advantages may be realized using a stent 10 as shown in
In use, the stent will be sized so that it is not fully expanded when fully deployed against the wall of a vessel in order that it will provide a measure of radial force thereto. The force will secure the stent and offer potential benefits in reducing intimal hyperplasia and vessel collapse or even pinning dissected tissue in apposition.
The stent employed in connection with the subject delivery system preferably comprises NiTi that is superelastic at room temperature and above. Also, it is preferably electropolished. The stent may be a drug eluting stent (DES). Such drug can be directly applied to the stent surface(s), or introduced into an appropriate matrix.
In a 0.014 inch delivery system (one in which the maximum nominal outer diameter of the stent/coating and guide member/restraint have a diameter that does not exceed 0.014 inch), the thickness of the NiTi is about 0.0025 inch (0.64 mm) for a stent adapted to expand to 3.5 mm. Such a stent is designed for use in a roughly 3 mm vessel or other body conduit, thereby providing the desired radial force in the manner noted above. Further information regarding radial force parameters in coronary stents may be noted in the article, “Radial Force of Coronary Stents: A Comparative Analysis,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 46: 380-391 (1999), incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
As for the stent that may be employed, an optional expanded stent cut pattern 10 is shown in
Regarding the finer details of the subject stent, necked down bridge or junction sections 12 are provided between adjacent struts 14, wherein the struts define a lattice of closed cells 16. The ends 18 of the cells are preferably rounded-off so as to be atraumatic. To increase stent conformability to tortuous anatomy, the bridge sections can be strategically separated or opened as indicated by broken line. To facilitate such tuning of the stent, the bridge sections are sufficiently long so that fully rounded ends 18 may be formed internally to the lattice just as shown on the outside of the stent if the connection(s) is/are severed to separate adjacent cells 16.
The advantage of the double-concave profile of each strut bridge or junction section 12 is that it reduces material width (relative to what would otherwise be presented by a parallel side profile) to improve trackability and conformability of the stent within the subject anatomy while still maintaining the option for separating/breaking the cells apart.
Further optional features of stent 10 are employed in the cell end regions 18 of the design. Specifically, strut ends 20 increase in width relative to medial strut portions 22. Such a configuration results in a majority of bending (during collapse of the stent) occurring along the length of the struts rather than at the corners of the cells. Longer struts to allow for lower stresses within the stent (and, hence, possibility for higher compression ratios). Shorter struts allow for greater radial force (and concomitant resistance to a radially applied load) upon deployment.
In order to provide a stent that collapses as much as possible (to solid or near-solid structure, such as shown in the fully-loaded systems of the figures) accommodation is made for the stiffer strut ends 20 provided in the design shown in
In addition, it is noted that gap 24 and angle β may actually be configured to completely close prior to fully collapsing angle α. The stent shown is not so-configured. Still, the value of doing so would be to limit the strains (and hence, stresses) at the strut ends 22 and cell end regions 18 by providing a physical stop to prevent further strain. Alternative, advantageous stent designs that may be used in connection with the present invention are presented in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/619,437, entitled, “Small Vessel Stent Designs”, filed Oct. 14, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
By utilizing any of these designs, very high compression ratios of the stent may be achieved. Compression ratios (from a fully expanded outside diameter to compressed outside diameter—expressed in those terms used by physicians) of as much as 3.5 mm: 0.014 inch (about 10×) are possible—with or without a drug coating and/or restraint used. Compression ratios of 3.0 mm:0.014 inch (about 8.5×), 3.5 mm:0.018 inch (about 7.5×), 3.0 mm:0.018 inch (about 6.5×), 2.5 mm:0.014 inch (about 7×), 2.5 mm:0.018 inch (about 5.5×), 2.0 mm:0.014 inch (about 5.5×), 2.0 mm:0.018 inch (about 4.5×) offer utility not heretofore possible with existing systems as well.
These selected sizings (and expansion ratios) correspond to treating 1.5 to 3.0 mm vessels by way of delivery systems adapted to pass through existing balloon catheter and microcatheter guidewire lumen. In other words, the 0.014 inch and 0.018 inch systems are designed to corresponding common guidewire sizes. The system may also be scaled to other common guidewire sizes (e.g., 0.22 inch/0.56 mm or 0.025 inch/0.64 mm) while offering advantages over known systems.
While designing the delivery systems to have a crossing profile corresponding to common guidewire sizes, especially for full-custom systems, intermediate sizes may be employed. Still further, it is contemplated that the system sizing may be set to correspond to French (FR) sizing. In that case, system sizes contemplated range at least from 1 to 1.5 FR, whereas the smallest know balloon-expandable stent delivery systems are in the size range of about 3 to about 4 FR.
At least when produced at the smallest sizes (whether in a even/standard guidewire or FR size, or otherwise), the system enables a substantially new mode of stent deployment in which delivery is achieved through an angioplasty balloon catheter or small microcatheter lumen. Further discussion and details of “through the lumen” delivery is presented in the above-referenced “Balloon Catheter Lumen Based Stent Delivery Systems” patent application.
In “small vessel” cases or applications (where the vessel to be treated has a diameter up to about 3.0 mm), it may also be advantageous to employ a stent delivery system sized at between about 0.022 to about 0.025 inch in diameter. Such a system can be used with catheters compatible with 0.022 inch diameter guidewires.
While such a system may not be suitable for reaching the very smallest vessels, in reaching the larger of the small vessels (i.e., those having a diameter of about 2.5 mm or larger), even this variation of the invention is quite advantageous in comparison to known systems. By way of comparison, the smallest known over-the-guidewire delivery systems are the Micro-Driver™ and Pixel™ systems by Guidant. These are adapted to treat vessels between 2 and 2.75 mm, the latter system having a crossing profile of 0.036 inches (0.91 mm). A system described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/0147491 for treating small vessels is purported to be capable of being made as small as 0.026 inch (0.66 mm) in diameter.
With respect to such systems, however, it must be appreciated that a further decrease in stent size may be practically impossible in view of materials limitations and functional parameters of the stent. Instead, the present invention offers a different paradigm for delivery devices and stents that are scalable to the sizes noted herein.
By virtue of the approaches taught herein, it is feasible to design system diameters to match (or at least nearly match) common guidewire size diameters (i.e., 0.014, 0.018 and 0.022 inch) for small vessel delivery applications. As noted above, doing so facilitates use with compatible catheters and opens the possibility for methodology employing the same as elaborated upon below and in the above-referenced “Balloon Catheter Lumen Based Stent Delivery Systems” patent application.
Of further note, it may be desired to design a variation of the subject system for use in deploying stents in larger, peripheral vessels, biliary ducts or other hollow body organs. Such applications involve a stent being emplaced in a region having a diameter from about 3.5 to about 13 mm (0.5 inch). In this regard, the scalability of the present system, again, allows for creating a system adapted for such use that is designed around a common wire size. Namely, a 0.035 to 0.039 inch (3 FR) diameter crossing profile system is advantageously provided in which the stent expands (unconstrained) to a size between about roughly 0.5 mm and about 1.0 mm greater than the vessel or hollow body organ to be treated. Sufficient stent expansion is easily achieved with the exemplary stent pattern shown in
Again, as a matter of comparison, the smallest delivery systems known to applicants for stent delivery in treating such larger-diameter vessels or biliary ducts is a 6 FR system (nominal 0.084 inch outer diameter), which is suited for use in an 8 FR guiding catheter. Thus, even in the larger sizes, the present invention affords opportunities not heretofore possible in achieving delivery systems in the size range of a commonly used guidewire, with the concomitant advantages discussed herein.
Several known stent delivery systems are compatible with (i.e., may be delivered over) common-sized guides wires ranging from 0.014 inch to 0.035 inch (0.89 mm). Yet, none of the delivery systems are themselves known to be so-sized.
As for the manner of using the inventive system as optionally configured,
Turning to
As illustrated in
Next, the balloon is at least partially deflated and passed forward, beyond the dilate segment 32′ as shown in
However, it should be appreciated that such an exchange need not occur. Rather, the original guidewire device inside the balloon catheter (or any other catheter used) may be that of item 50, instead of the standard guidewire 40 shown in
Once placement of the stent across from dilated segment 32′ is accomplished, stent deployment commences. The manner of deployment is elaborated upon below. Upon deployment, stent 52 assumes an at least partially expanded shape in apposition to the compressed plaque as shown in
Naturally, the balloon need not be reintroduced for postdilatation, but it may be preferred. Regardless, once the delivery device 50 and balloon catheter 42 are withdrawn as in
In the above description, a 300 cm extendable delivery system is envisioned. Alternatively, the system can be 190 cm to accommodate a rapid exchange of monorail type of balloon catheter as is commonly known in the art. Of course, other approaches may be employed as well.
Furthermore, other endpoints may be desired such as implanting an anchoring stent in a hollow tubular body organ, closing off an aneurysm, delivering a plurality of stents, etc. In performing any of a variety of these or other procedures, suitable modification will be made in the subject methodology. The procedure shown is depicted merely because it illustrates a preferred mode of practicing the subject invention, despite its potential for broader applicability.
A more detailed overview of the subject delivery systems is provided in
Regarding the overall delivery guide, however, it preferably comprises an atraumatic distal tip 206 of one variety or another. On the other end of the delivery device, a custom handle 208 is preferably provided.
The handle shown is adapted for rotable actuation by holding body 210, and turning wheel 212. It may include a lock 214. Furthermore, a removable interface member 216 facilitates taking the handle off of the delivery system proximal end 218. The interface will be lockable with respect to the body and preferably includes internal features for disengaging the handle from the delivery guide. Once accomplished, it will be possible to attach or “Doc” a secondary length of wire 220 on the delivery system proximal end, allowing the combination to serve as an “exchange length” guidewire, thereby facilitating changing-out the balloon catheter or performing another procedure. Alternatively, the wire may be an exchange-length wire.
Either way, packaging may include one or more of an outer box 252 and one or more inner trays 254, 256 with peel-away coverings as is customary in packaging of disposable products provided for operating room use. Naturally, instructions for use can be provided therein. Such instructions may be printed product or be provided in connection with another readable (including computer-readable) medium. The instructions may include provision for basic operation of the subject devices and/or the selection methodology.
Regarding the specifics of the restraint employed in the delivery device, it preferably is one that does not have a section that increases in size during, or after, deployment of the stent. They are such that restraint diameter remains constant or actually decreases in diameter upon withdrawal from the stent and release of the same.
Regarding the first variation shown in
Distal of the connection “C” between members 302 and 304, a shoulder section may be ground into the wire or a separate ring 306 may be attached thereto to provide a stop surface 308 for abutting the stent to be delivered. Moving toward the distal tip 310, the system may be tapered as shown. The length of the extension over which the restraint rides is variable as is the restraint. The taper may be desired for increased distal flexibility.
The overall length of the system from a distal tip (possibly incorporating an atraumatic tip, to the base of any actuation device provided may be around 135 cm (53 inch) to 200 cm (79 inch) or more preferably between 180 cm (71 inch) and 190 cm (75 inch). Overall longer or shorter system lengths are also contemplated. The length of the extension 302 and stent-overlying restraint/connector is variable. The length of the extension section may be between about 10 cm to 15 cm, about 15 cm to about 25 cm or up to 30 cm or longer as possibly influenced or dictated by system flexibility requirements.
Returning, however, to the specific device configuration shown in
Of course, the restraint and bridge section may be provided integrally (in which case the bridge may be connected directly to the inner member—or by differently configured connector piece). Otherwise, they may be made of different materials. For example, the connector may comprise stainless steel or Nitinol (just as other members of the delivery guide) and the restraint a polymeric material. A polymeric restraint (such as polyimide or PET may be desired since it is readily obtained in very thin-wall tubing—down to 0.00025 inch).
In
Overall, the system has a diameter (“D”) dictating its crossing profile. To actuate the device, inner/core member 320 is withdrawn causing the restraint to slide off of the stent without the diameter D to increase as the clearance gap (“G”) between the restraint and sleeve is closed.
Note, however, that it may be the case that no open gap G is provided. This may be accomplished by extending the sleeve over the connector as indicated by dashed lines in
As noted above, the sleeve may be extended by another piece of material connected thereto. Advantageously, it could be a thin-walled polymeric tube. Alternatively, the “extension” may be provided in a relative sense by moving the connection point between the sleeve and the extension wire proximally within the sleeve. In either case, the additional sleeve length and relative positioning of elements is indicated by the addition of the phantom line structure in
Another variation of the invention is shown in
Yet, except for the symmetry that such an approach provides over that of the one-sided approach (and concomitant advantages in terms of consistency in flexibility and distribution of loads, for example), the system is much like that shown in
In any case, the side sectional view in
Connection options between the extension member and the sleeve are shown in sections D-D. The sections show the connection sections “C” as well as the manner in which bridge sections 416 pass by the same.
Note, further that the restraint in this variation of the delivery device may change diameter from a diameter external to the stent to a diameter internal to the delivery device. Yet, this need not be the case. However, it provides a highly space-efficient system, in which the length of the restraint and any bridge sections can be minimized.
Furthermore, it should be noted that the device may be configured such that bridge sections are progressively formed by cutting the restraint apart as it is drawn into the sleeve. Blade or wedge portion 418 can assist in such action. Alternatively, the restraint may be scored, perforated or otherwise made splittable so that simply being pulled into openings across the connection C separates the restraint into bridge sections.
Still further, it is contemplated that the restraint may be pre-split. An example of such a case is shown in
An important aspect of the invention that is well illustrated in
The coil may be secured at a proximal point or location “PC” to the extension member or sleeve. Then, by preloading the structure and securing it at a distal location “DC” to the restraint (optionally, by way of an intermediate band 328 shown in
The sleeve optionally extends beyond this connection point “C” as shown. Such an approach offers a system less prone to contamination and potentially more stable in actuation. However, it may require a weld-type joint or an interlocking interface with a hole (not show) in sleeve. As above, cross-sectional views taken along various lines—in this case
In the variation of the invention in
Extension member 302′ is shown as a tube with a slot 364 formed therein. The slot is shown covered by restraint 322, though this need not be the case. Indeed, this “tube” 302′ and tube 326″ may be configured otherwise. Either entity may be any sort of body including various oval, hex, square, etc. sections—either with a closed periphery at some location or slotted aling the entire length so as to define one-half, two-thirds of a tube or any of a C, U, V section. etc.
Regardless of all such optional constructions or alternative variations, in a generic sense, the delivery guide member body comprises or consists substantially of an inner member (possibly a core member in order to minimize size and maximize strength) set within a proximal tubular member or sleeve, with an extension member secured to or within the tubular member. The extension section carries the stent and preferably terminates in an atraumatic tip. A restraint is provided external to a collapsed stent, the restraint being actuated by the core member in an inside-out fashion, particularly by way of a bridging connection between the inner member and the restraint.
In regard to any such system, it is to be understood that conventional materials and techniques may be employed in the system construction. In this regard, it will often be desired to provide a lubricious coating or cover between moving components to reduce internal system friction.
In addition, it is to be understood that various radiopaque markers or features may be employed in the system to 1) locate stent position and length, 2) indicate device actuation and stent delivery and/or 3) locate the distal end of the delivery guide. As such, various platinum (or other radiopaque material) bands or other markers (such as tantalum plugs) may be variously incorporated into the system. Alternatively, or additionally, the stent stop or blocker member may be made of radiopaque material. Especially where the stent employed may shorten somewhat upon deployment, it may also be desired to align radiopaque features with the expected location (relative to the body of the guide member) of the stent upon deployment. For example, it may be desired to incorporate radiopaque features into the restraint and/or bridge or connector sections so that the deployment motion of the device is visible under fluoroscopy. Exemplary markers that may be of use are shown at a proximal end of the stent in
Though the invention has been described in reference to several examples, optionally incorporating various features, the invention is not to be limited to that which is described or indicated as contemplated with respect to each embodiment or variation of the invention. The breadth of the present invention is to be limited only by the literal or equitable scope of the following claims. That being said,
This is a Continuation-In-Part of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/792,679 filed Mar. 2, 2004, which application is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10792679 | Mar 2004 | US |
| Child | 10991721 | Nov 2004 | US |
