Wells are generally drilled into the ground to recover natural deposits of hydrocarbons and other desirable materials trapped in geological formations in the Earth's crust. A slender well is drilled into the ground and directed to the targeted geological location from a drilling rig at the Earth's surface.
Once a formation of interest is reached in a drilled well, drillers often investigate the formations and their contents by taking samples of the formation rock at multiple locations in the well and analyzing the samples. Typically, each sample is cored from the formation using a hollow coring bit, and the sample obtained using this method is generally referred to as a core sample. Once the core sample has been transported to the surface, it may be analyzed to assess the reservoir storage capacity (porosity) and the flow potential (permeability) of the material that makes up the formation; the chemical and mineral composition of the fluids and mineral deposits contained in the pores of the formation; and the irreducible water content of the formation material. The information obtained from analysis of a sample is used to design and implement well completion and production.
Several coring tools and methods of coring have been used. Typically, “conventional coring” is done after the drillstring has been removed from the wellbore, and a rotary coring bit with a hollow interior for receiving the core sample is lowered into the well on the end of a drillstring. A core sample obtained in conventional coring is taken along the path of the wellbore; that is, the conventional coring bit is substituted in the place of the drill bit, and a portion of the formation in the path of the well is taken as a core sample.
By contrast, in “sidewall coring” a core sample is taken from the side wall of the drilled borehole. Side wall coring is also performed after the drillstring has been removed from the borehole. A wireline coring tool that includes a coring bit is lowered into the borehole, and a small core sample is taken from the sidewall of the borehole. Multiple core samples may be taken at different depths in the borehole.
Sidewall coring is beneficial in wells where the exact depth of the target zone is not well known. Well logging tools, including coring tools, can be lowered into the borehole to evaluate the formations through which the borehole passes.
There are two common types of sidewall coring tools, rotary coring tools and percussion coring tools. Rotary coring tools use an open, exposed end of a hollow cylindrical coring bit that is forced against the wall of the bore hole. The coring bit is rotated so that it drills into the formation, and the hollow interior of the bit receives the core sample. The rotary coring tool is generally secured against the wall of the bore hole by a support arm, and the rotary coring bit is oriented towards the opposing wall of the borehole adjacent to the formation of interest. The rotary coring bit typically is deployed from the coring tool by an extendable shaft or other mechanical linkage that is also used to actuate the coring bit against the formation. A rotary coring bit typically has a cutting edge at one end, and the rotary coring tool imparts rotational and axial force to the rotary coring bit through the shaft, other mechanical linkage, or hydraulic motor to cut the core sample. Depending on the hardness and degree of consolidation of the target formation, the core sample may also be obtained by vibrating or oscillating the open and exposed end of a hollow bit against the wall of the bore hole or even by application of axial force alone. The cutting edge of the rotary coring bit is usually embedded with carbide, diamonds or other hard materials for cutting into the rock portion of the target formation.
After the desired length of the core sample or the maximum extension of the coring bit is achieved, the core sample typically is broken from the formation by displacing and tilting the coring tool.
After the core sample is broken free from the formation, the hollow coring bit and the core sample within the coring bit are retrieved into the coring tool through retraction of the coring shaft or mechanical linkage that is used to deploy the coring bit and to rotate the coring bit against the formation. Once the coring bit and the core sample have been retracted to within the coring tool, the retrieved core sample is generally ejected from the coring bit to allow use of the coring bit for obtaining subsequent samples in the same or in other formations of interest. When the coring tool is retrieved to the surface, the recovered core sample is transported within the coring tool for analysis and tests.
The second common type of coring is percussion coring. Percussion coring uses cup-shaped percussion coring bits that are propelled against the wall of the bore hole with sufficient force to cause the bit to forcefully enter the rock wall such that a core sample is obtained within the open end of the percussion coring bit. These bits are generally pulled from the bore wall using flexible connections between the bit and the coring tool such as cables, wires or cords. The coring tool and the attached bits are returned to the surface, and the core samples are recovered from the percussion coring bits for analysis.
In one or more embodiments, the invention is related to a coring bit comprising an outer hollow coring shaft and a rotationally uncoupled internal sleeve disposed inside the outer hollow coring shaft. In some embodiments, the uncoupled internal sleeve is non-rotating. In other embodiments, the uncoupled internal sleeve is free-floating.
In one or more embodiments, the invention is related to a downhole coring tool for taking a core sample from a formation comprising a tool body, an outer hollow coring shaft extendable from the tool body, an internal sleeve disposed inside the outer hollow coring shaft, and a tilting structure disposed inside the outer hollow coring shaft. The tilting structure may be operatively coupled to the internal sleeve to that the internal sleeve will tilt when fully extended from the tool body. In some embodiments, the tilting structure is a ramp block.
In one or more embodiments, the invention relates to a downhole coring tool for taking a core sample from a formation comprising a tool body, an outer hollow coring shaft extendable from the tool body, and a rotationally uncoupled internal sleeve disposed in the outer hollow coring shaft. In some embodiments, the uncoupled internal sleeve is non-rotating. In other embodiments, the uncoupled internal sleeve is free-floating.
In one or more embodiments, the invention relates to a method for taking a core sample comprising extending a coring bit into a formation, receiving the core sample in a rotationally uncoupled internal sleeve disposed inside the coring bit, and retrieving the core sample from the formation. In some embodiments, the method also includes tilting the coring bit and retracting the coring bit back into a tool body.
In one or more embodiments, the invention relates to a percussion coring bit comprising an outer hollow coring shaft, and an internal sleeve disposed inside the outer hollow coring shaft. The internal sleeve may be adapted to be removed from the outer hollow coring shaft with a core sample retained in the internal sleeve.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description and the appended claims.
The present invention, in one or more embodiments, relates to an uncoupled internal sleeve that receives and protects a sample core. An uncoupled internal sleeve may be non-rotating, and it may be free-floating. Optionally, in some embodiments, the sleeve may be permitted to rotate continuously, or at desired intervals.
The coring bit 501 may also include an uncoupled internal sleeve 507. The uncoupled internal sleeve 507 is disposed inside the outer hollow coring shaft 503. In some embodiments, the uncoupled internal sleeve 507 has an internal diameter that is substantially the same as the internal diameter of the formation cutting element 505. In some embodiments, the uncoupled internal sleeve 507 has an internal diameter that is larger than the internal diameter of the formation cutting element 505. In the embodiment shown in
An “uncoupled” internal sleeve, as used herein, is a sleeve that is not rotationally coupled to the rotating parts of the coring tool, i.e., the outer shaft and the formation cutting element. In some embodiments, the internal sleeve is a “non-rotating” internal sleeve that does not rotate with respect to the coring tool. A non-rotating internal sleeve may be coupled to the coring tool in a manner so that it will not rotate. In some embodiments, the uncoupled internal sleeve is a “free-floating” internal sleeve. A free-floating internal sleeve is not rotationally coupled to the rotating parts of the coring tool, but it is free to rotate independently.
It will also be understood that the advantages of a tilting device 515 may be present even in embodiments of the invention where the internal sleeve is rotationally coupled to the rotating parts of the coring bit The advantages of a tilting device 515 may be realized without an uncoupled internal sleeve 507. Further, a ramp block is just one embodiment of a structure that causes an internal sleeve to tilt. For example, a cam may cause an internal sleeve to tilt. Also, a spring mechanism may be used to cause an internal sleeve to tilt when it clears the stationary support shaft.
Those having ordinary skill in the art will be able to devise other tilting structures that do not depart from the scope of the invention. While the tilting device 515 of
In some embodiments, the sample core may be severed by other devices. For example, a clam type cutter included in a coring bit is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/832,606, which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention. This application is hereby incorporated by reference. Other severing devices, including a clam cutter, may be used without departing from the scope of the invention.
Alternately, it is noted that the core sample 633 and the uncoupled internal sleeve 607 need not be retrieved while the outer hollow coring shaft 603 remains extended into the formation 633. For example, a tool may include a plurality of bits and each bit may store the sample that it receives during the sampling process. Also, the entire bit 601 may be retrieved into the tool body 625, and the bit 601 may be pivoted to a vertical position, similar to the position shown in prior art
In some embodiments, an uncoupled internal sleeve may be marked so that it can be identified from other sleeves. For example, a particular coring tool may be adapted to take ten core samples on a run into a wellbore. The ten uncoupled internal sleeves in the coring tool that will be used to collect core samples may be marked sequentially with the numbers one through ten. When the coring tool is retrieved, a number five, for example, will positively identify the location from which the sample in the sleeve was taken as the fifth location in the run of the coring tool. A marking may include a bar code or a transceiver identifier. Those having ordinary skill in the art will be able to devise other numbering or marking schemes without departing from the scope of the invention.
Some embodiments of the invention may include a percussion coring bit. In these embodiments, the outer hollow coring shaft does not rotate. An internal sleeve may be able to be removed from the outer hollow coring shaft for core sample transportation. Many advantages of the present invention may be realized in such embodiments.
Another aspect of the invention relates to gripping a core sample once the core sample is received in the internal sleeve. Gripping prevents the core sample from rotating within the sleeve or falling out of the sleeve. FIGS. 7A7F show embodiments of coring bits that include gripping devices.
In some embodiments, the protrusions 705 are located near the distal end 707, or the open end that received a core sample, of the internal sleeve 701. In this configuration, the protrusions 705 grip the core sample as it enters the internal sleeve 701. Those having ordinary skill in the art will realize that the protrusions 705 may be located at any radial or axial location on the hollow cylinder 703 of the internal sleeve 701. For example, the protrusions 705 may be located near the proximal end 709 of the internal sleeve 701. In that position, the protrusions would grip a core sample only near the end of the sample taking process, when the sample core reaches the protrusions 705 near the proximal end of the internal sleeve 701.
Those having ordinary skill in the art will also realize that protrusions are not limited to the shape shown in
Further, an internal sleeve may contain more than one type of protrusion.
The protrusions 805, 808 may be moved by any means known in the art. For example, a rigid part or parts (not shown) of a coring bit or coring tool (not shown) may be positioned so as to contact the protrusions 805, 808 or their support members 806, 809 as the internal sleeve 801 is extended into a formation to collect a sample. Those having ordinary skill in the art will be able to devise other methods of moving external protrusions without departing from the scope of the invention.
While
In one embodiment, such as the one shown in
The slot 902 shown in
A hollow cylinder need not include a slot, as shown in
Embodiments of an uncoupled internal sleeve may be used in different types of coring tools. For example, there are several common configurations for sidewall coring tools.
One or more embodiments of the present invention may provide certain advantages. These advantages may include maintaining core integrity while drilling, retrieving, storing, and transporting a core sample. Some embodiments may include a non-rotating sleeve so that a core sample is not subjected to the rotation of the coring bit throughout the entire drilling process. Once a sample is drilled by a rotating formation cutting element, the sample will pass into the coring bit and into the non-rotating sleeve. The non-rotating sleeve will protect the sample from damage that may be caused by the rotation of other parts of the coring bit. This is especially advantageous in unconsolidated formations, where a rotating coring bit may cause the core sample to fall apart or erode. A rotating coring bit may contact the core sample as the sample is being taken, and the friction applied to the core sample may erode part of the sample. Further, even if a rotating coring bit does not directly contact a core sample, the rotation of the bit may cause a fluid, for example drilling mud, present in the borehole or formation to flow around the core sample in the gap between the core sample and the coring bit. Such fluid flow may erode the core sample. A protective internal sleeve may prevent erosion damage to the core sample.
Embodiments of the invention that include a free-floating internal sleeve may protect a core sample from the rotation of other parts of the bit. Advantageously, a free-floating internal sleeve may rotate with a sample if a core sample were to be severed from a formation before the completion of the sample taking process. When premature severing occurs, the core sample may rotate in the coring bit due to the rotation of the formation cutting element. A free-floating internal sleeve may rotate along with the sample, thereby protecting it from damage caused by friction and fluid erosion.
Advantageously, an uncoupled internal sleeve enables the safe removal of samples from the coring tool. The coring tool itself does not need to be transported to the analysis site to protect the samples in the coring tool. Instead, an uncoupled internal sleeve may be removed from the tool with a core sample stored inside the uncoupled internal sleeve. An uncoupled internal sleeve enables a core sample to be removed from a coring tool and transported to an analysis site without any direct contact with the core sample. Only the uncoupled internal sleeve is handled in the removal and transporting of samples. The uncoupled internal sleeve may protect the sample from damage caused by a core pusher during ejection, a sample container or marker during storage, or the weight of other samples above the core sample in a sample container.
Advantageously, a ramp block, if included, enables the uncoupled internal sleeve to be tilted without tilting the remainder of the coring bit. The coring tool does not require a mechanism to tilt the coring bit. Instead, a ramp block may cause the uncoupled internal sleeve to independently tilt.
Further, in a coring tool where the samples are removed from the coring bit and stored within the tool, an internal sleeve in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention enables a positive identification of the depth at which each sample was taken. Even if an unconsolidated sample is stored, or if a stored sample is otherwise destroyed, an internal sleeve would occupy space in the sample container so that an accurate depth of other samples may be determined. Embodiments where the internal sleeve is individually marked enable a positive identification of the location from which the core sample in the internal sleeve was taken by looking only at the marking on the internal sleeve.
Advantageously, embodiments of the invention that include a core sample gripping device enable an internal sleeve to retain a core sample in the internal sleeve while minimizing the damage to the core sample. The sample may be retrieved from the formation, transferred into a sample container within a coring tool, and removed from the tool at the surface for transportation to an analysis site while being retained in the internal sleeve. Thus, an internal sleeve enables protection of a core sample at all phases of the drilling, severing, retrieving, storing, removing, and transporting processes.
While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
366913 | Ball | Jul 1887 | A |
1830681 | Floyd | Nov 1931 | A |
1932612 | Williston | Oct 1933 | A |
2044057 | Burt | Jun 1936 | A |
2181980 | Seale | Dec 1939 | A |
2230568 | Howard et al. | Feb 1941 | A |
2252620 | De Long | Aug 1941 | A |
2306369 | Anderson | Dec 1942 | A |
2343793 | Paget | Mar 1944 | A |
2490512 | Deely | Dec 1949 | A |
2558227 | Yancey et al. | Jun 1951 | A |
2738167 | Williams, Jr. | Mar 1956 | A |
2852230 | Garrison | Sep 1958 | A |
3092192 | Deely | Jun 1963 | A |
3428138 | Casper et al. | Feb 1969 | A |
3537743 | Martinsen | Nov 1970 | A |
3598191 | Bullard | Aug 1971 | A |
3964555 | Franklin | Jun 1976 | A |
4002213 | Sweeney | Jan 1977 | A |
4258803 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4354558 | Jageler et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4424183 | Nelson | Jan 1984 | A |
4518051 | Sollie et al. | May 1985 | A |
4607710 | Radford | Aug 1986 | A |
4609056 | Colle, Jr. et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4629011 | Reinhardt | Dec 1986 | A |
4667753 | Jageler | May 1987 | A |
4669082 | Tilghman et al. | May 1987 | A |
4702168 | Colle, Jr. et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4714119 | Herbert et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4790396 | Fuller | Dec 1988 | A |
4818050 | Duthie | Apr 1989 | A |
4839516 | Freeman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4864846 | Jones | Sep 1989 | A |
4911002 | Enderlin et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4950844 | Hallmark et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4969528 | Jurgens | Nov 1990 | A |
4979576 | Barker et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4981183 | Tibbitts | Jan 1991 | A |
4996489 | Sinclair | Feb 1991 | A |
4996872 | Mueller et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5025872 | Behre et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5029653 | Jurgens et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5031536 | Barker et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5052502 | Jurgens et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5105894 | Enderlin | Apr 1992 | A |
5146999 | Wiser et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5163522 | Eaton et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5230390 | Zastresek et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5253719 | Blauch et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5277062 | Blauch et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5310013 | Kishino et al. | May 1994 | A |
5325723 | Meadows et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5360074 | Collee et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5411106 | Maissa et al. | May 1995 | A |
5439065 | Georgi | Aug 1995 | A |
5482123 | Collee | Jan 1996 | A |
5487433 | Mackay et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5546798 | Collee et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5554302 | Carabine | Sep 1996 | A |
5560438 | Collee et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568838 | Struthers et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5617927 | Maissa | Apr 1997 | A |
5667025 | Haessly et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5741707 | Herron et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5868030 | Brumley et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5881825 | Collee et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5957221 | Hay et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6006844 | Van Puymbroeck et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6047239 | Berger et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6283228 | Collee et al. | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6341656 | Fanuel et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6371221 | Harrigan et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394196 | Fanuel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401840 | Hay et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6412575 | Harrigan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
20020148643 | Contreras et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030173116 | Wells et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2236780 | Sep 1989 | GB |
2417045 | Feb 2006 | GB |
1161129 | Jun 1989 | JP |
11236709 | Aug 1999 | JP |
1157220 | May 1985 | SU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040140126 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |