Coaxial cables commonly used today for transmission of RF signals, such as television signals, are typically constructed of a metallic inner conductor and a metallic sheath “coaxially” surrounding the core and serving as an outer conductor. A dielectric material surrounds the inner conductor and electrically insulates it from the surrounding metallic sheath. In many of the commercially available coaxial cable constructions, the dielectric material is an expanded foamed plastic, which surrounds the inner conductor and fills the spaces between the inner conductor and the surrounding metallic sheath.
Precoat layers are an integral part of most of these coaxial cable designs. The precoat is a thin, solid or foamed polymer layer that is extruded or applied in liquid emulsions over the surface of the inner conductor of the coaxial cable prior to the application of subsequent expanded foam or solid dielectric insulation layers. Precoats are usually made up of one or more of the following materials: a polyolefin, a polyolefin copolymer adhesive, an anti-corrosion additive and fillers. The precoat layer serves one or more of the following purposes: (1) It allows for a more controlled surface to be prepared on which to deposit subsequent extruded dielectric insulation layers. (2) It is used with or without added adhesive components to promote adhesion of the dielectric material to the center conductor in order to reduce movement of the center conductor in relation to the surrounding insulation. Significant movement of this type can cause the center conductor to pull back out of the grip of a field connector creating an open electrical circuit. This phenomenon creates a field failure commonly known as a center conductor “suck out”. (3) It is used with or without added adhesive components to promote adhesion of the precoat layer and subsequent dielectric insulation layers to prevent dielectric shrink back. (4) It is used to reduce or eliminate water migration paths at the dielectric/center conductor interface. Water migration into the dielectric of the coaxial cable has obvious detrimental impacts such as increases in RF attenuation.
Unfortunately, a consequence of the design of currently available precoats meeting the above criteria is that the precoat layer requires extra steps to remove it from the center conductor prior to installation of the connector. During field installation of the coaxial cable, the ends of the cable must be prepared for receiving a connector that joins the cable to another cable or to a piece of network electrical equipment, such as an amplifier. The preparation of the cable end is typically performed using a commercially available coring tool sized to the diameter of the cable. For coaxial cables having a foam dielectric, the coring tool has an auger-like bit that drills out a portion of the foam dielectric to leave the inner conductor and outer conductor exposed. Examples of coring tools of this type are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,345,375, 4,459,881, 4,729,268, and 5,749,270.
The coring tools that are commercially available greatly facilitate preparing the cable end for receiving a connector, unfortunately, however, they do not consistently and reliably remove all of the precoat from the center conductor. Therefore, after this “coring” step and just prior to the installation of the connector, it has been necessary for the installer to physically remove any of the precoat layer that remains adhered to the inner conductor. The prescribed method employs a tool with a nonmetallic “blade” or scraper that the technician uses to scrape or peel back the precoat layer, removing it from the conductive metal surface of the inner conductor.
According to the procedures prescribed in the field installation manual “Broadband Applications and Construction Manual”, sections 9.1 and 9.2 published by coaxial cable manufacturer CommScope, Inc., the field technician is instructed to use a non-metallic tool to clean the center (inner) conductor by scoring the coating on the center conductor at the shield and scraping it toward the end of the conductor. The conductor is clean if the copper is bright and shiny. If this step is not properly performed or if this step is completed with incorrect tools, such as knives or torches, the inner conductor or other components can be damaged, reducing the electrical and/or mechanical performance of the cable and reliability of the network.
From the foregoing, it should be evident that the need exists for improvements in a coaxial cable coring tool so that during the coring operation, the precoat layer will be reliably and consistently removed from the center conductor.
The present invention provides improvements in a coaxial cable coring tool which provides for reliable and consistent removal of the precoat during the coring operation. The coring tool is designed to reliably and completely remove all of the precoat layer from the center conductor of the cable during the operation of the tool. In preferred embodiments, the dimensional tolerances of the tool are controlled so that the precoat layer and the dielectric material are removed by, at least in part, a tearing, torsional force, rather than a slicing action, to thereby completely remove the precoat layer from the inner conductor by the operation of the coring tool.
The coring tool of the present invention is designed for preparing the end of a coaxial cable of the type that has an inner conductor, a precoat layer adhered to the inner conductor, a dielectric material adhered to the precoat layer, and a tubular metallic outer conductor of a predetermined diameter and thickness surrounding the dielectric material. The coring tool comprises a housing having an axially extending open end adapted for receiving the coaxial cable and a cutting tool mounted to the housing and extending coaxially toward said opening. The cutting tool includes a cylindrical coring portion having an outside diameter sized to be received within the outer conductor of the coaxial cable, an axially extending bore for receiving the inner conductor of the coaxial cable, and at least one cutting edge at the end of the coring portion which is configured for creating a tearing component on the dielectric material and precoat layer, rather than substantially entirely slicing the dielectric material and precoat.
The coring portion may include a channel or flute formed in the outer cylindrical surface of the coring portion and a generally radially extending surface at the axial end of the coring portion. In this instance, said at least one cutting edge comprises a generally radially extending cutting edge formed at the junction of the radial surface and the channel or flute. This radially extending cutting edge has a thickened, blunt configuration for imparting a tearing, torsional force on the dielectric material rather than a 100% slicing of the dielectric material. This radially extending cutting edge may desirably have a thickness of 0.010 to 0.050 inch or a radius of 0.005 to 0.025 inch. The coring portion may additionally include a second cutting edge formed at the junction of the outer end of the flute or channel and the bore and extending in a direction generally parallel to the axis of the bore. This axially extending second cutting edge has a thickened, blunt configuration for creating a tearing action, rather than a slicing action, on the dielectric material and precoat layer. The axially extending second cutting edge may desirably have a thickness of from 0.005 to 0.030 inch or a radius of 0.0025 to 0.015 inch.
Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
a is a side elevation view showing one side of the cutter.
b is a side elevation view showing the opposite side of the cutter.
a is a side elevation view showing one side of another embodiment of the cutter.
b is a side elevation view showing the opposite side of the cutter of
The present invention now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, the invention may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout.
As illustrated in
A dielectric layer 14 surrounds the center conductor 12 and precoat layer 16. The dielectric layer 14 is a low loss dielectric formed of a suitable plastic such as polyethylene, polypropylene or polystyrene. Preferably, to reduce the mass of the dielectric per unit length and thus the dielectric constant, the dielectric material is an expanded cellular foam composition, and in particular, a closed cell foam composition is preferred because of its resistance to moisture transmission. The dielectric layer 14 is preferably a continuous cylindrical wall of expanded foam plastic dielectric material and is more preferably a foamed polyethylene, e.g., high-density polyethylene. Although the dielectric layer 14 of the invention generally consists of a foam material having a generally uniform density, the dielectric layer 14 may have a gradient or graduated density such that the density of the dielectric increases radially from the center conductor 12 to the outside surface of the dielectric layer, either in a continuous or a step-wise fashion. For example, a foam-solid laminate dielectric can be used wherein the dielectric 14 comprises a low-density foam dielectric layer surrounded by a solid dielectric layer. These constructions can be used to enhance the compressive strength and bending properties of the cable and permit reduced densities as low as 0.10 g/cc along the center conductor 12. The lower density of the foam dielectric 14 along the center conductor 12 enhances the velocity of RF signal propagation and reduces signal attenuation.
A thin polymeric precoat layer 16 surrounds the center conductor 12 and adheres the center conductor to the surrounding dielectric 14. The precoat layer 16 preferably has a thickness between 0.0001 to 0.020 inches, most desirably between 0.0005 and 0.010 inches.
Closely surrounding the dielectric layer 14 is an outer conductor 18. In the embodiment illustrated in
The inner surface of the outer conductor 18 is preferably continuously bonded throughout its length and throughout its circumferential extent to the outer surface of the dielectric layer 14 by a thin layer of adhesive 22
An optional protective jacket (not shown) may surround the outer conductor 18. Suitable compositions for the outer protective jacket include thermoplastic coating materials such as polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyurethane and rubbers.
The coring tool, shown in
During the coring operation, the end of a cable is placed through the open end 34 of the housing with the endmost surface of the cable dielectric contacting the axial end of cutting tool 32. As the coring tool is rotated, the cutting tool engages and cuts the dielectric material and precoat layer, separating these materials from the inner conductor and from the outer conductor. The scrap pieces of dielectric material and precoat layer cut from the dielectric travel along the helical flute 60 as the cutter advances into the cable.
a and 5b illustrates a cutter 32′ in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the invention. This cutter is similar in many respects to the embodiment shown in
Existing coaxial cable coring tools incorporate a variety of criteria into the tool design. Some design attributes directly affect the ability of the tool to remove the dielectric and the precoat layer cleanly, while other attributes have no significant effect. The design criteria that exhibit the most influence in achieving removal of the precoat layer are the following:
1. Diameter of the inner bore (33,33′) that accepts the coaxial cable center conductor. This diameter is indicated by the reference character C in
2. Angle of entry of the outward cutting edge and width of flute (for helix-type bits). See dimensions E and D respectively on
3. Thickness of the radially extending cutting edge 56 located on the outward end of the coring tool bit. This edge is perpendicular to the coaxial cable axis and functions for cutting away a portion of the dielectric material as the coring tool is axially rotated. See dimension A on
4. Thickness of the cutting edge 58 located near the outward end of the coring tool bit and forming a portion of the wall that defines the inner bore. This edge is parallel to the coaxial cable axis and functions for separating the dielectric material from the center conductor. See dimension B on
For the coring tool to be effective in consistently removing the precoat layer, the above-noted design criteria must meet certain design specifications.
The diameter C of the inner bore 33 is a dimension that has minimal effect on tool performance when used with standard products. However, this dimension is very important in achieving complete removal of the precoat layer, and is especially important with cables with a precoat designed and engineered to strip cleanly from the center conductor, as is described in U.S. provisional patent Application No. 60/503,384, filed Sep. 16, 2003, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
More specifically, the clearance between the coring tool inner bore 33 and the coaxial cable center conductor 12 should be controlled such that the ratio of outer diameter of the cable center conductor Dc to the inner diameter of the bore Db is within the range of 0.60 to 0.90. Tools with inner bore to center conductor clearances outside of this range become unable to consistently break the precoat/center conductor bond and cleanly remove the precoat layer. Measurements on commercially available coring tools reveal that this clearance percentage is not controlled, and varies over a wide range for various sizes and manufacturers of coring tools.
The entry angle of the coring bit will also influence performance. Additionally, for helix-type bit designs, the flute width will also influence performance. To successfully remove the dielectric material, the entry angle must be relatively aggressive. It is preferred that this angle (dimension E on
In addition, for cutter designs that employ a helix-type flute 60 for scrap removal, the flute width (dimension D on
The thickness A, B of the cutting edges 56 and 58 determines whether the tool preferentially cuts or tears the dielectric material. With existing coring tools, it is common practice to use a sharp cutting edge to cut or slice the dielectric material from the cable end. However, this method of removal is ineffective for complete removal of the precoat layer. To effectively remove all dielectric material and adhering precoat, it is preferred that a tearing component be employed in preference to a cutting action. This is achieved by increasing the thickness or radius of the cutting edges on the coring portion 54 to present a somewhat blunt cutting edge. This tearing action of the coring tool cutting edges produces a tortional force on the dielectric material which is significantly greater than that achieved by a sharp cutting edge. This force, in turn, helps to remove the precoat from the cable center conductor by twisting the dielectric and breaking the precoat/center conductor bond.
The thickness or radius of these cutting edges is determined by the coring tool inner bore diameter clearance, entry angle and flute width. As the inner diameter bore clearance increases, the thickness or radius of the cutting edges should also increase. As the entry angle and/or flute width increases, the thickness or radius of the cutting edges should decrease. Preferably the radially extending cutting edge 56 should have a thickness A of from 0.010 to 0.050 inch or a radius equal to one half thickness A, and the cutting edge 58 extending parallel to the tool axis should have a thickness B of from 0.005 to 0.030 inch or a radius equal to one half thickness B.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these inventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
This application is related to and claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/524,980 filed Nov. 25, 2003.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60524980 | Nov 2003 | US |