The present invention relates to cork extractors and, more particularly, to cork extractors which minimize the amount of countervailing force which must be applied to a bottle during cork extraction to offset the force applied to lift a cork out of the bottle.
Many types of cork extractors have been previously proposed. Many cork extractors rely upon a lever which, after burying a corkscrew into a cork, requires upward force applied to a lever in order to extract the cork from a bottle. The position of the upwardly directed force relative to the bottle generally requires that an equal and opposite force be applied to the bottle in order to prevent the bottle from moving. Such designs result in wasted effort as countervailing forces must be applied by the user.
While some previous designs of corkscrews have used handles to apply the force necessary to extract a cork from a bottle, to the knowledge of the present inventor, such handles have been in the form of cranks wherein the portion gripped by the person using the device is offset in a single direction from the rotational axis of the crank. Additionally, some such devices utilize a driving mechanism which is at an angle to the vertical axis upon which the cork travels during extraction, thus, also requiring that countervailing forces being applied to the bottle during cork extraction.
Another aspect of some cork extractors is that a corkscrew is driven down through a block containing a helical passageway in order to impart a spiraling movement to the corkscrew. This facilitates insertion of the corkscrew into the cork. Such devices typically comprise a screw carrier. Typically, after insertion of the corkscrew into the cork, such screw carriers are attached to the block containing the helical passageway in order to prevent the corkscrew from simply spiraling back out of the cork during extraction of the cork from the bottle. Such devices which connect a screw carrier to the block containing the helical passageway, for example with releasable latches or friction, are unduly complicated structures and can be unreliable during operation. It would therefore be desirable to provide a cork extractor wherein the tendency of the corkscrew to rotate out of the cork is impeded by structure, which is independent of the screw carrier.
It would also be desirable to provide a cork extractor which minimizes or eliminates the need for forces which countervail the forces being applied to remove the cork from a bottle.
The various embodiments of the present invention significantly reduce the countervailing forces that must be applied to a bottle during extraction of a cork by providing a handle having a rotational axis substantially perpendicular to the vertical, longitudinal axis of a cork as it is removed from a bottle. The preferred, illustrated handle of the present invention comprises gripping portions on opposite sides of the rotational axis of the handle. This design is designed to receive a couple, i.e. a pair of equal, parallel forces acting in opposite directions and tending to produce rotation. Thus, this design maximizes the use of the forces applied to the handle for cork extraction and reduces the countervailing forces which need to be applied to a bottle or other container during extraction of a cork.
Another aspect of the present invention is the control of the corkscrew to prevent the corkscrew from reverse spiraling out of the cork during the application of upwardly directed forces, and independently of the screw carrier.
One embodiment of the present invention comprises a cork extractor for extracting a cork from a container comprising a support, a screw carrier movably connected to said support for vertical movement relative to said support, means for vertically moving said screw carrier relative to said support; a screw head rotatably connected to said screw carrier; a corkscrew connected to said screw head; a nut block, a spring and a rotation control, wherein said nut block, spring and rotation control are vertically movable relative to said support; said nut block comprising a helical passage adapted to receive said cork screw whereby vertical movement of said cork screw through said passage imparts spiral motion to said cork screw; said spring disposed between said nut block and said rotation control for biasing said rotation control vertically away from said nut block; said rotation control and said screw head comprising engageable structures to prevent rotation of the corkscrew relative to a cork while a cork is being extracted from a container.
Another embodiment of the present invention comprises a cork extractor comprising a support, a corkscrew movable relative to said support along a first axis; a drive mechanism for moving said corkscrew; and a handle for imparting force to said drive mechanism, said handle rotatable about a second axis which is generally perpendicular to said first axis, said handle comprising gripping portions on generally opposite sides of said second axis.
Another embodiment of the present invention comprises a cork extractor comprising a support, a plurality of racks movably connected to said support, said racks comprising gears and selectively movable in two directions, at least one movable drive gear which engages said racks such that movement of said at least one drive gear causes synchronous movement of said racks; and a screw carrier, connected to said racks, a corkscrew connected to said screw carrier and disposed generally between at least two of said racks.
As used herein the term “cork” is used to refer to corks comprising either natural cork or synthetic materials.
The Figures illustrate two embodiments of the present invention.
In order to facilitate personalization, such as when the cork extractor is provided as a gift or when given away as a premium promotional product, a nameplate 24 is also advantageously provided on the assembled left cover 12 and right cover 13.
As best shown in
Additionally, with reference to
Corkscrew 36 is secured within screw head 37, e.g. with an adhesive, such as via epoxy bonding. The lower portion of screw head 37 comprises a sawtooth edge 37A designed for engagement with a complementary sawtooth edge on an upwardly facing surface 33A of the spring-biased, rotation control 33 on nut block 31. Nut block 31 comprises a helical passage 51 which will impart a spiral motion to corkscrew 36 when corkscrew 36 is driven downwardly (or upwardly) through nut block 31. The sawtooth edges 37A on screw head 37 and the sawtooth edges 33A on rotation control 33 are angled to permit clockwise rotation of screw head 37 (as viewed from above) relative to rotation control 33 when screw head 37 first contacts rotation control 33 during the downward movement of the corkscrew 36. It will be appreciated that rotation control 33 has some limited downward resiliency due to the resiliency of control spring 32. Since nut block 31 is also secured to support 16 through rack 29 and rack 30, neither nut block 31 nor rotation control 33 are free to rotate. This arrangement permits screw head 27 and corkscrew 36 to rotate in a clockwise direction during the initial downward movement until screw head 37 is firmly seated on rotation control 33. At this point, the substantially vertical edges of the sawtooth structures 37A and 33A impede relative rotation of screw head 37 and rotation control 33. This prevents corkscrew 36 from rotating (counterclockwise) out of a cork when an upwardly force is applied to screw carrier 34. While the surfaces of each tooth of the illustrated sawtooth structures meet at well defined edges, e.g. the top portions of sawtooth structures 33A, these portions can also be formed with flat tops or rounded tops.
As explained in greater detail below, during operation nut block 31 is movable vertically with respect to both mounting support 16 and screw carrier 34. With reference to
The driving vertical motion imparted to screw carrier 34 is achieved by translating the rotational force applied to handle mount 15 from handle 14 through a right pinion 25 and left pinion 26 which are connected via a connection pin 28 and pinion pins 27. Right pinion 25 drives a right rack 30 while left pinion 26 drives a left rack 29 vertically relative to mounting support 16. Rotation of handle mount 15 relative to right cover 13 is advantageously facilitated with a pinion bearing 43. The vertical movement of left rack 29 and right rack 30 are guided by linear guideways 16A in mounting block 16.
As shown in
The operation and positions of the various components during various stages of cork removal operation are illustrated in
From the present description, it will be appreciated that the present invention advantageously provides a cork extractor comprising a screw carrier, a screw head rotatably connected to the screw carrier, and a nut block comprising a helical passage adapted to receive the corkscrew and to impart a spiral motion to the corkscrew. The present invention prevents the corkscrew from spiraling back out of the cork during cork removal independently of the screw carrier.
The present invention also provides a cork extractor comprising a support, a rotatable screw head and corkscrew movable along a generally vertical axis, and a handle for imparting driving force to the screw head/corkscrew having an axis of rotation generally perpendicular to the vertical axis of the corkscrew.
The various embodiments of the present invention provide several advantages compared to previously known cork extractors. Compared to cork extractors with lever actions, some embodiments of the present invention utilize couples which are easier to generate by hand and easier to balance due to their inherent directional consistency. The present design offers smooth operation requiring significantly less effort than previous designs and is therefore ideally suited for people not having strong hands. The use of couples provides a high degree of design freedom with respect to the mechanical parts so that applied stresses are more evenly distributed. This allows most of the parts of the cork extractor to be formed of injected plastic improving quality, consistency and cost competitiveness. The elimination of a lever allows the present design to be compact and easy to store without a special stand or box. The elimination of a lever also makes the overall operation simpler by reducing the number of steps required for a typical cork removal. With a lever type unit, since the movement of the corkscrew is synchronized with that of the lever, the lever usually has to be lifted up from its storage position before the unit is positioned over an unopened bottle. When a cork is expelled from a lever type unit (after the cork has been extracted from a bottle), the lever is usually in an extended position and must be lowered prior to storage. These two extra steps of raising the lever prior to commencing operation and folding the lever down following the step of expelling the cork are not required with the present invention. Storability and portability are further enhanced with the foldable handle.
Additionally, one embodiment of the present invention described herein comprises a plurality of racks which are driven by gears connected to the handle. The screw carrier is connected to the racks with the corkscrew generally disposed between at least two parallel racks. This aspect of the present invention provides an even distribution of the forces applied to the screw carrier, and hence to the corkscrew, during the various phases of the cork extraction process, i.e. during movement in different directions.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
106036 | Dickson | Aug 1870 | A |
344566 | Cluever | Jun 1886 | A |
515411 | Walker | Feb 1894 | A |
814641 | Coomber | Mar 1906 | A |
876049 | Fialcofsky | Jan 1908 | A |
884873 | Stanton | Apr 1908 | A |
4703673 | Allen | Nov 1987 | A |
5079975 | Spencer, Jr. | Jan 1992 | A |
5257565 | Hung | Nov 1993 | A |
5361652 | Andina | Nov 1994 | A |
5924338 | Peck | Jul 1999 | A |
5934160 | Gibson | Aug 1999 | A |
6073519 | Presa Eguren | Jun 2000 | A |
6257092 | Gort-Barten | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6357322 | Dolan et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6622330 | Puig | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6739215 | Lozeau et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6978696 | Yu | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7069813 | Cheung | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7069825 | Cheung | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7398709 | Vitrac et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
20030126953 | Kushner | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20050199097 | Soen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050217434 | Opolka | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060185477 | Sun | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070089570 | Vitrac et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107554 | Yeager | May 2007 | A1 |
20070107555 | Zhou | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202 19 538 | Mar 2003 | DE |
1 215 165 | Jun 2002 | EP |
2 318 103 | Mar 1997 | FR |
2 053 867 | Feb 1981 | GB |
2 304 703 | Mar 1997 | GB |
2 399 566 | Sep 2004 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090241737 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |