The corn harvester header has several mechanisms which raise the fallen plants and separate the stalks from the corn, strip most of the non-kernel material and take the corn to the kernel feeder in the harvester machine. Among the component parts are the chassis, the collection unit, the conveyor belt, and the crop divisors.
As the harvester moves on the field, the crop divisors enter the corn rows and each plant is taken by the rotating snapping rolls, the surface of which has longitudinal splines resembling a pair of cogged gearwheels Therefore each stalk entering said rolls is dragged down, separating the ear (with diameter bigger than the stalks) from the rest of the plant by passing through two smooth metal plates placed with their straight edges parallel between them, called deck plates These build a channel wide enough for the stalk to go through, but too narrow for the ears to pass, and then it is stripped.
Once the ear is stripped, it is taken by two gatherer chains which lead ears, husks and some loose stalks toward the conveyor feeder. For this action to be done, a synchronicity of relative speeds between the advance and the tangential speed of rolls and chains must be achieved.
The crop dividers purpose is to guide or channel the plants toward the gatherer chains and the snapping rolls (fallen crops, unaligned crops, etc.). They must be able to “penetrate” below the fallen plants, and deliver them individually and erect to the rolls. They must have a reduced penetration angle and good height in the rear.
Meanwhile, the gathering chains transport the ears toward the conveyor, for which they have attachments that in fallen crops collaborate with the divisors to transport the plants toward the rolls. The distance between one attachment and the next must allow for an ear to pass through longitudinally to the chain so therefore it can be successfully carried toward the conveyor. The input channel must be wide between the divisors so as the chains can be uncovered and grasp the plant.
Two snapping rolls per row spin concentrically pulling the plant downwards to prevent it (or parts of it) from entering along the ear into the harvester. The snapping rolls are known for having a frontal zone in the shape of a spiral, which favors the orderly input of the plant. They are followed by a pulling zone with linear splines, fins or blades which violently lower the stalk between the deck plates (with adjustable separation), thus making it possible for the ears to become free from the stalks.
A condition of these types of row harvesting headers is that the separation between the seeded row crops and the separation between the harvesting units must coincide to be successfully harvested. However, it is very frequent to find crop rows that do not coincide with the harvesting units' slots, as it can be seen in
The problem concerns plants showing a great shift or misalignment when the header is going through the crop, these plants are generally deviated by the divisors to be forced to enter the harvesting unit, therefore causing an excessive tilt of the plant. When entering with such tilt, the plant may brake and fall to the ground, or not be taken by the harvester and, thus, a great part of the crop is not picked up by the unit, a consequence of the standard design of the divisors and the harvesting set (
The standard design of the divisors (1) from the prior art, as shown in
There are related documents which try to solve these problems, a patent document related to the divisor point published as US2015068179A1. Where what is revealed is a divisor containing cuts in its lateral sides; it is a modified standard divisor working together with a harvesting unit revealed in the patent document AR074937A1. In the latter, a pair of gathering chains are mentioned, one mounted on each arm of the unit frame (known technique) where each gathering chain opens on its frontal end to create a greater feeder to capture misaligned plants.
Document EP2862433A1 describes a crop divisor with non-vertical lateral sides tapered on their bottom part. They can be: flat, concave or convex, with the purpose of reducing bending on the plant. However, this invention only refers to improvements on the divisor, and does not improve the misaligned plants transition from the divisor to the gathering chains. On is back part, on the front of the chains, the divisor has a bulbous shape; this surface can produce impact with the plants delaying the feed and reducing its efficiency. Also, this shape gives it a higher constructional complexity.
The invention revealed in these presents establishes improvements over what is known. Placing a device with mobile and fixed elements to guide the misaligned crop on the frontal part of a harvesting unit. This has the advantage, compared to the gathering chain, of freeing the function of guiding stalks with the rest of the procedure, configuring optimal feed speeds or number of attachments necessary for each stage. Instead, using the same gathering element to the two functions (guiding the stalks and transporting the ears, as is described in document AR074937A1) may have deficiencies in the guiding stalks stage, because the distance between attachments (pass) is bound to the size or a maize ear where, over said stage it would be more advantageous to have a lesser gap between attachments. Also another advantage is to work with the guiding elements at a greater height than the gathering chains, thus generating a lesser bending on the plant.
Besides, this frontal device could be placed on a unit working without gathering chains or with only one chain, actioning the elements (chains or guiding belts) with electric, hydraulic or otherwise engines, or place them directly on the unit using another concept in plant processing.
Placing a toothed belt as guiding mobile element has the following advantages compared to the use of one chain: less weigh, less vibration, less wear and greater mechanical efficiency (less power consumption).
On the other hand, to work together with this system, it is not necessary to use a line divisor with cuts or castings, simply move the contact border upwards to place the frontal device below thus obtaining benefits regarding the bending produced on the plant. Also its geometry is easy to build, being a standard divisor known without cuts or castings on their lateral sides.
To face the problems of row harvesting, the objective of this invention is to add a frontal mobile device on a standard corn harvesting unit which contains elements designed to guide the misaligned stalks and lead them efficiently toward the center of a slot. This frontal device has two guiding elements (chain type or conveyor belt type) placed so as to when the two devices are placed adjacently, one at each side of the center of a slot, these guiding elements succeed in creating an opening bigger than the harvesting slot. Thus the deviated stalks are captured and centered by being guided toward the processing channel (
The frontal device, besides being composed by mobile chains or straps, has deflectors which guide the material toward them and deflectors which guide the plants toward the snapping rolls (
To work with this system it is not necessary to use a line divisor with modifications such as cuts on it lateral sides or concave lateral sides, etc. The crop divisor is only disengaged (displaced) from the lower line of the hood a certain distance “F” (
A top view (
The frontal deflector has also the advantage of making the transition between the divisor and the guiding elements (chains or belts); which keeps the front part of the harvesting unit always covered, regardless of the height that the divisor is regulated at. In other words, the deflector is fixed to the unit and there is relative movements between parts when a height adjustment is done between the deflector and the divisor working with interference.
The purpose of one embodiment of this invention is to provide a corn harvester header (36) comprising multiple harvesting units (37) placed adjacently at a certain distance “Dc” between each other (
The purpose of one embodiment of this invention is to provide a line divisor (10) displaced upwards from the articulation point (23) a certain distance “F” (
After the misaligned plants (17) are guided by the line divisor (10) toward the slot (11) in the unit (
According to this invention, this system has the advantage of being able to modify the tangential speed of the guiding elements (14) in relation to the speed of the gathering chain (12), consequently optimizing each function separately. According to one embodiment of this invention, the system comprises a double front wheel (16) driven by the spinning of the gathering chain (12), said double wheel (16) is linked to a gearwheel above, this wheel provides movement to the independent frontal element (14), which works on a plane higher than the gatherer (
Placing these guiding elements (14) in front of the gathering chain (12) has the advantage of being independent from said chain to optimize the guiding function of the misaligned plants (17) without modifying the gathering features of harvested material. In other words, the two mechanisms with different functions are separate, one guides the stalks (17) and the other transports the ears (18) (
According to another embodiment of this invention, it is possible to place different kinds of transport on the guiding elements (14), which may be a chain similar to the gathering chain (12), or a flexible transport element with or without attachments (20), with no detriment to the ear transport (18) function.
Another advantage of this invention is the possibility to have a greater opening of the guiding elements (14) compared to what is observed in the prior art, thus capturing plants with greater misalignment. As
In an embodiment of this invention, the guiding elements (chain or belt) (14) as well as the crop divisor (10) with higher edge (6) are placed in a higher plane than the collecting chain (12). This has the advantage that contact with the plant (9) to guide it happens at a higher height, therefore the tilt is less and, as it was previously explained, the plant is taken by the most flexible part which means less breakage or fallen plants.
Another advantage of this invention is from the constructional point of view. By the embodiment of this invention, it is possible to raise the contact edge (6) of the divisor (10) without needing complex designs with cuts or casts on the crop divider points (1). Achieving this effect without needing a divisor (10) with too much constructional sophistication, on the contrary, a divisor (1) known in the art is used where the joint point (23) is raised. This reduces production times, machining costs and materials. This elevation (23) also allows placing the frontal device (24) previously described.
In an embodiment of this invention (
In an embodiment of this invention (
Although the invention has been described in detail regarding certain preferred embodiments, there are variations and modifications within the scope and spirit of one or more independent aspects of the invention as it is described.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
P180101535 | Jun 2018 | AR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/064681 | 6/5/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/234111 | 12/12/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1063201 | Jacobs | Jun 1913 | A |
1727021 | Van Nortwick | Sep 1929 | A |
3127723 | Procter | Apr 1964 | A |
4539799 | Kalverkamp | Sep 1985 | A |
10021832 | Wenger | Jul 2018 | B2 |
20110041472 | Rottinghaus | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20150068179 | Lambertini | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150319929 | Hendrickson et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20170055447 | Missotten | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170238467 | Gessel et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170280620 | Desai | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180139902 | Walker et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
074937 | Feb 2011 | AR |
198 15 571 | Oct 1999 | DE |
2 862 433 | Apr 2015 | EP |
3143864 | Aug 2018 | EP |
Entry |
---|
English translation of document AR 074937 A1 referred to on pp. 3-4 of International PCT Publication WO 2019/234111 A1 (12 pages). |
International Search Report (PCT/ISA/210) issued in PCT Application No. PCT/EP2019/064681 dated Aug. 23, 2019 (four (4) pages). |
Written Opinion (PCT/ISA/237) issued in PCT Application No. PCT/EP2019/064681 dated Aug. 23, 2019 (five (5) pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210267123 A1 | Sep 2021 | US | |
20220174876 A9 | Jun 2022 | US |