Corn protein retention during extraction

Abstract

Described herein is a method of maintaining corn protein yield during extraction, comprising obtaining a corn gluten material, washing the corn gluten material to remove non-protein components with an ethanol-water solvent comprising at least 85 wt % ethanol to obtain a corn protein concentrate product, wherein the loss of corn protein content during extraction is less than 25% of total corn protein.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to concentrated corn protein and methods of making concentrated corn protein.

BACKGROUND

For over 100 years, corn wet milling has been used to separate corn kernels into products such as starch, protein, fiber and oil. Corn wet milling is a two-stage process that includes a steeping process to soften the corn kernel to facilitate the next wet milling process step that result in purified starch and different co-products such as oil, fiber, and protein. Further corn processing methods are now being investigated to further purify the protein co-product for incorporation into food-grade products, specifically. A combination of increasing interest on the part of consumers for protein in their diet and increasing concerns about the cost and availability of animal derived proteins is causing food companies to look increasingly for new sources of protein.

SUMMARY

Described herein is a method of maintaining corn protein yield during extraction, comprising obtaining a corn gluten material, washing the corn gluten material to remove non-protein components with an ethanol-water solvent comprising at least 85 wt % ethanol to obtain a corn protein concentrate product, wherein the loss of corn protein content during extraction is less than 25% of total corn protein.

FIGURES

FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C, and 1D show protein solubilization is promoted by lower ethanol concentrations and higher temperatures (25° C. left panel (1A, 1C); 42.5° C. right panel (1B, 1D)) during extraction.

FIGS. 2A and 2B show the effects of ethanol concentration, solvent-feed ratio and temperature (25° C. left panel (2A); 42.5° C. right panel (2B)) during extraction on the yield of the final corn protein concentrate product.

FIGS. 3A and 3B show ethanol concentration, solvent-feed ratio and temperature (25° C. left panel (3A); 42.5° C. right panel (3B)) during extraction impacts the composition of the final corn protein concentration product.

FIGS. 4A and 4B show ethanol concentration, solvent-feed ratio and temperature (25° C. left panel (4A); 42.5° C. right panel (4B)) during extraction impacts overall corn protein yield index.

FIGS. 5-7 show holding the slurry at elevated temperatures or treating the slurry with H2O2 prior to extraction reduced protein loss. H2O2 treatment had an additional benefit of reducing protein loss particularly at higher extraction temperatures.

FIGS. 8-10 show the effects of holding the slurry at elevated temperatures or treating the slurry with H2O2 prior to extraction and the effects of ethanol concentration, solvent-feed ratio and temperature during extraction on the yield of the final corn protein concentrate product.

FIGS. 11-13 show the effects of holding the slurry at elevated temperatures or treating the slurry with H2O2 prior to extraction and the effects of ethanol concentration, solvent-feed ratio and temperature during extraction on protein concentration in the final corn protein concentrate product.

FIGS. 14-16 show the effects of holding the slurry at elevated temperatures or treating the slurry with H2O2 prior to extraction and the effects of ethanol concentration, solvent-feed ratio and temperature during extraction on corn protein yield index.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Protein ingredients are among the more expensive to prepare in high concentration. Often starting from a low-concentration natural product, many food proteins are prepared from by-products of processes intended to recover other components. For example, soy protein isolate is prepared from soy solids remaining after extraction of the oil fraction. Whey protein is prepared from soluble protein remaining after formation and pressing of cheese.

The corn protein described herein is prepared from a corn material, preferably a corn gluten material, which is a by-product of starch production in a wet milling process. The corn gluten material described herein is not destarched, hence contains a significant amount of starch granules (approximately 20% dry weight basis). Furthermore, the corn gluten material described herein comprises between 50 wt % to 70 wt % corn protein on a dry weight basis, and in preferred aspects comprises 60 wt % to 70 wt % corn protein on a dry weight basis. The corn gluten material described herein can be in a wet-cake form typically comprising 50-70 wt % moisture, or alternatively in a dried form comprising 3-6 wt % moisture.

The corn gluten material described herein optionally can be heat treated and/or treated with sulfite-neutralizing agents such as hydrogen peroxide, which not only can have a positive impact on corn protein yield but can also reduce sulfite levels commonly found in corn gluten materials. Such heat treatment can occur at temperatures ranging from 55° C. to about 85° C., preferably 60-80° C., and most preferably 65-75° C. Various sulfite-neutralizing agents such as oxidizing agents can be used to improve corn protein yield and to reduce free sulfite in the final corn protein products. Among sulfite-neutralizing agents, oxidizing agents specifically hydrogen peroxide is preferred. Hydrogen peroxide can be added to the corn gluten material in amounts that sufficiently neutralize free sulfite contained in the corn gluten material. Hydrogen peroxide is added at molar ratios of up to 5.0, preferably at molar ratio of up to 2.0 and more preferably at molar ratio of 1.0-1.5 to that of free sulfite contained in the corn gluten material. It is preferred that hydrogen peroxide is added to the corn gluten material with at least 15 min thorough mixing prior to washing. Heating treatment can be applied after the addition of hydrogen peroxide to optimize their effects on protein yield and sulfite reduction.

Normally, corn gluten material contains lipids (free fatty acids, phospholipids, sterols, tri-, di- and monoglycerides, etc.), pigments (lutein, beta-carotene, zeaxanthin, etc.), soluble carbohydrates (glucose, maltose, maltotriose and higher oligomers of glucose), organic acids (acetic, propionic, succinic, etc.) and in some circumstances mycotoxins (aflatoxin, zearalenone, etc.). Thus the corn protein material is at risk of generating soapy or rancid flavors from the lipids, astringent or sour flavors from the organic acids, undesirable colors in foods that contain the corn gluten material or health risks from the mycotoxins. Converting the corn gluten material from a form suitable for feed to a form desirable for food requires maximum removal of the lipid, pigment, mycotoxin and organic acids and a maximum retention of corn protein.

Because protein ingredients can be expensive, it is beneficial to prepare these corn protein ingredients at as low a cost as possible. Developing a process to achieve a desired final corn protein product composition with the highest protein yield and lowest cost is critical. In this context, the protein must be useful in foods for human and animal consumption, so the optimization is not simply a function of achieving an acceptable chemical composition; the resulting ingredient must have a suitable functional behavior suitable for the food process and product it is used in. It is recognized that some foods intended for animals, like pet foods, have functionality requirements similar to those required for human foods.

Aspects herein describe the production of a corn protein product, specifically corn protein concentrate, comprising 55-85 wt % or 55-80 wt % corn protein on a dry weight basis.

The desired corn protein product comprises less than 2 wt % oil, preferably less than 1.5 wt % oil, and even more preferably less than 1.0 wt % oil, all on a dry basis.

The desired corn protein product is light in color with an “a*” color value ranging from 0 to 4, and more preferably 0 to 2, a “b*” color value ranging from 15 to 35, and more preferably 15 to 30, and an “L*” color value ranging from 70 to 90, and more preferably 80 to 90.

A general process for the production of such corn protein product has been described in pending patent applications PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US17/23999 (filed on Mar. 24, 2017), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Described therein is a process by which corn gluten material undergoes a series of solvent washing steps to produce a corn protein product.

In the course of developing the process to prepare a corn protein product that meets expectations, it has been discovered that the water present in the process had a number of effects on the process and that good control of the water concentration at various stages of the process is desirable. For example, excess water in the extracting solvent, especially at elevated temperatures, dissolves a portion of the protein and removes it from the final corn protein product. This did not tend to diminish the purity of the final corn protein product, but it substantially decreased the protein yield. Under some conditions, greater than 35% of the protein is lost. While this protein could be recovered from the extract and returned to the main ingredient pool, this recovery requires additional equipment investment and expense in operations. It is more economical to prevent the dissolution of the protein in the initial extraction phase.

Another undesirable phenomena associated with protein processing is fouling of surfaces, especially heat-contact surfaces. It was discovered that the water concentration in the extraction process could have a significant effect on the tendency of the protein to stick to surfaces. Equipment could be modified, particularly designed to be oversized to manage this stickiness, but that increases both the capital and operating expenses of the operation. It is more economical to manage the water concentration to mitigate this effect.

A final undesirable outcome is obtained when the water concentration present in the extraction process creates a physical behavior of the finished ingredient that is undesirable. Too much or too little water during extraction can modify the susceptibility of the corn protein product to physical or chemical reaction during extraction or subsequent processing. Identifying and applying specific water concentrations can be used to create specific functionalities. Because foods and food processes have differing functional requirements, water management may also have the potential to impact certain functionalities.

Accordingly, the invention disclosed herein provides a method of maintaining corn protein yield during an extraction process to obtain a desirable corn protein concentrate product.

The extraction process includes the steps of obtaining a corn gluten material and washing the corn material with an ethanol-water solvent comprising at least 85 wt % ethanol to obtain a corn protein product. As previously described, it was found surprising that reducing water content during the extraction process provides enhanced corn protein yield. Accordingly, in more preferable aspects, the ethanol-water solvent comprises at least 90 wt % ethanol, and even more preferably at least 93 wt % ethanol, and most preferably at least about 97 wt % or 98 wt % ethanol. It is recognized that in a counter-current extraction system, the corn protein material will be exposed to a range of water concentrations. In such a case, the higher the concentration of ethanol making initial contact with the corn material, the more desirable an outcome.

The ethanol solvent to corn protein product ratio also impacts corn protein yield. Accordingly, the extraction process described herein preferably has a solvent to corn protein ratio ranging from 5:1 to 25:1 (kg/kg).

Temperature also surprisingly affects the corn protein yield, and it was found that lower extraction temperatures are more desirable. More specifically, the extraction method described herein occurs at temperatures ranging from about 5-50° C., even more preferably range from about 20-30° C., and yet more preferably 25-30° C.

As demonstrated in the examples below, heat and hydrogen peroxide treatments prior to washing step in combination with reducing water content and operating at lower temperatures during subsequent extraction step improves the corn protein yield such that the loss of protein during extraction is less than 25%, more preferably less than 15%, and even more preferably less than 5%, 4%, 3%, 2% or 1% of total corn protein. In other aspects, the loss of ranges between 10% and 25% of total corn protein, even more preferably between 10% and 20% of total corn protein, and even more preferably between 5% and 15% of total corn protein.

Total corn protein is determined as the total nitrogen analyzed by combustion multiplied by 6.25; the nitrogen is primarily in the form of amino acids. Corn protein yield is expressed as percent of the final corn protein product weight divided by the weight of the raw corn gluten material on a moisture-free basis (or dry weight basis, dwb). Corn protein yield index is calculated by multiplying percent final product yield with percent protein content in the final product on a dry weight basis. The corn protein yield index herein ranges from about 0.55 to about 0.75.

EXAMPLES

Example 1: Effect of Temperature and Ethanol Concentration on Protein Solubilization and Yield

Corn gluten slurry was obtained from the Cargill corn milling plant in Dayton, Ohio. The corn gluten slurry was dewatered by filtering through Whatman #3 filter paper. The resulting wet cake, at about 60% moisture, was freeze-dried to a final moisture concentration of 4.97% determined by Mettler-Toledo moisture analyzer at 110° C. The freeze-dried material contained 64.0% protein (N×6.25) on an as-is basis. The freeze-dried material was ground in a Waring blender at low speed until ˜3+ mm large pieces disappeared. The ground material (1.4000-6.0000 g) was weighed into 50-ml polypropylene test tubes with screw caps. Then aqueous ethanol solvent containing 2-25% deionized water (98-75% ethanol, weight-by-weight) was added to each test tube at solvent/solid (9% moisture) ratios of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 to create treatments with varying water concentrations in the extraction system and varying solvent/solid, water/solid, EtOH/solid, water/EtOH ratios as shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1
The solvent
	% (wt/wt)	Ratios, g/g
% (wt/wt)	g solvent/	EtOH in	solvent/	water/	EtOH/
EtOH	g feed (as-	final	100%	100%	100%	EtOH/
used	is % DS)	solvent	DS	DS	DS	water
98	25	97.8	26.5	0.58	26.82	44.6
	20	97.8	21.2	0.48	21.56	43.6
	15	97.7	16.1	0.37	16.19	42.1
	10	97.5	10.7	0.27	10.78	39.3
	5	97.0	5.3	0.16	5.40	32.7
93	25	92.8	26.4	1.90	25.45	12.9
	20	92.8	20.7	1.49	20.41	12.8
	15	92.7	16.2	1.18	15.32	12.7
	10	92.5	10.8	0.80	10.25	12.4
	5	92.1	5.4	0.42	5.13	11.6
87	25	86.8	26.7	3.51	23.89	6.6
	20	86.8	20.8	2.75	19.12	6.6
	15	86.7	16.1	2.14	14.36	6.5
	10	86.6	10.5	1.41	9.58	6.4
	5	86.1	5.3	0.74	4.79	6.2
82	25	81.8	26.1	4.74	22.50	4.5
	20	81.8	21.3	3.87	18.05	4.5
	15	81.7	16.3	2.97	13.50	4.5
	10	81.6	10.3	1.91	9.01	4.4
	5	81.2	5.3	1.00	4.51	4.3
75	25	74.9	25.9	6.52	20.50	3.0
	20	74.8	21.0	5.29	16.51	3.0
	15	74.8	16.0	4.05	12.38	3.0
	10	74.6	10.6	2.69	8.26	2.9
	5	74.3	5.3	1.37	4.14	2.9

The screw-capped test tubes containing both testing material and solvent were horizontally placed in a shaker that was set at 100 rpm orbital motion and maintained at either 25° C. (ambient) or 42.5° C. for 60 min During the 60 min extraction, the solid was gently moving in the solvent inside the test tubes to allow thorough contacting of the solid particles with the solvent without excessive force to minimize physical break down of solid particles.

After 60 min extraction, the test tubes were centrifuged at 4,000 rpm for 5 min at ambient temperature. The liquid from each test tube was carefully transferred to pre-weighed test tubes to record its net weight. The liquid was analyzed for protein and other dry solids. For the analysis, about 2.00 ml of liquid was pipetted into pre-weighed ceramic Leco cells with tin inserts. The Leco cells were placed in a fume hood for about 4 hours to allow ethanol evaporation then placed into a vacuum oven set at 50° C. and 25-inches vacuum to dry. After weighing again for the calculation of dry solids, the Leco cells were analyzed for protein concentration (using nitrogen factor of 6.25) in a Leco nitrogen analyzer. Calculations of protein in the cake fraction obtained from initial centrifugation were made by subtracting those determined in the liquid fraction from those contained in the starting material. It was assumed that equilibriums were achieved after 60 min extraction treatment at both temperatures.

The results show protein solubilization (the desire is to avoid protein solubilization) is promoted by lower ethanol concentrations and higher temperatures (see FIGS. 1A and 1B). Protein extraction increases almost linearly as the feed-solvent ratio increases when viewed as solvent-feed there is a sharp decline in extraction as the ratio increases towards 10, with less sensitivity at higher ratios. Protein accounted for the majority of solubilized solids, particularly at higher temperatures with low ethanol concentrations.

Results show extraction conditions, namely ethanol concentration, extraction temperature, and solvent-feed ratio all impact the yield and composition of final corn protein products with most significant effect found for temperature and ethanol concentration. Generally, higher ethanol (lower water), higher solvent-feed ratio and lower temperature resulted in higher yield and higher protein purity, leading to higher overall corn protein yield indices (FIGS. 2-4).

Example 2: Effect of Heat and H2O2 Treatment on Protein Solubilization by Ethanol Solvents at Different Temperatures

Corn gluten slurry containing 800 ppm SO2 was obtained from the Cargill corn milling plant in Dayton, Ohio. The corn gluten slurry was either directly used (no heat treatment, control) or divided into 1-L polypropylene bottles. For control, 2 samples were prepared. The non-H202 control was obtained by immediate centrifugation. The H202-control sample was obtained by adding H202 solution (30% active H202, wt/wt) to the slurry (final active H202 was 600 ppm) followed by mixing at ambient temperature for 15 min then centrifugation. For heat treatments, the bottles contain the slurry with or without H202 addition (final active H202 was 600 ppm) were horizontally placed in a shaker set at 100 rpm and either 65° C. or 75° C. for 30 min or 1 hour. For 85° C. treatment, the bottles were placed in a water bath maintained at 85° C. with overhead mixing for 30 min or 1 hour. After treatment, the slurry was centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 5 min and liquid decanted. The wet cake was placed in a fume hood to further dry down to about 60% moisture levels measured by Mettler-Toledo moisture analyzer at 110° C. The wet caked was transferred to sealed plastic bags and stored in a refrigerator for subsequent solubility tests.

For solubility tests, 3 g, or 4.5 g or 8 g samples were weighted into 50-ml test tubes then 32 g or 36 g solvent of 98% (wt/wt) aqueous ethanol was added to the test tubes thus creating 3 solvent-cake ratios of 12 to 1, 8 to 1, and 4 to 1 with final solvent EtOH concentration in the system being 85.6-93.5% (wt/wt) respectively. Table 2 summarizes various aspects of the matrix compositions. The test tubes were tightly capped then horizontally placed in a shaker set at ambient temperature (˜25° C.), or 42.5° C. or 60° C. and gently (60 rpm) shaken in orbital motion for 30 min followed by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 5 min. The liquid was carefully collected and about 2 ml was analyzed for dry solid and protein.

TABLE 2
Solubility test matrix compositions.
The solvent	Ratios (wt/wt)
g solvent/	% (wt/wt)	EtOH/	g	g EtOH/	g
g feed	EtOH in	water	solvent/	g	Water/g
(58% DS)	final solvent	(wt/wt)	g DS	DS	DS
4	85.6	9.2	10.8	9.2	1.5
8	91.4	18.4	20.3	18.4	1.7
12	93.5	27.7	29.8	27.7	1.9

Again, protein loss due to solubilization was promoted by higher water concentration and higher extraction temperatures. Furthermore, data shows higher holding temperatures and longer holding time at a given temperature prior to de-watering results in lower protein loss when extraction was done at 25° C. A similar trend was found for 42.5° C. but to a lesser extent. When extraction was carried out at 60° C., holding at 85° C. had lower protein loss than the control but higher protein loss than those held at 65° C. or 75° C., and little difference was found between those holding at 65° C. and 75° C. Results also show that neutralization of SO2 by H202 treatment reduced protein loss across all three ethanol concentrations and extraction temperatures. Data also suggests holding the H202-treated slurry at elevated temperature for prolonged periods of time has additional benefits of reducing protein loss, increasing yield and protein purity in the final product, resulting in increased overall corn protein yield indices (FIGS. 5-16).

Claims

1. A method of maintaining corn protein yield during extraction, comprising: obtaining a corn gluten material;heat treating the corn gluten material;treating the corn gluten material with hydrogen peroxide; andwashing the corn gluten material to remove non-protein components with an ethanol-water solvent comprising at least 85 wt % ethanol to obtain a corn protein concentrate product;wherein the loss of corn protein content during extraction is less than 25% of total corn protein, andwherein the heat treating step is carried out before the washing step, the temperature of the heat treating step ranges from 55° C. to 85° C., the hydrogen peroxide treating step is carried out before the washing step, and the hydrogen peroxide is added to the corn gluten material at a molar ratio of 0.5-5.0.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the ratio of solvent to corn gluten material ranges from 5:1 to 25:1.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the heat treating step is applied after the hydrogen peroxide treating step.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the ethanol-water solvent comprises at least 90 wt % ethanol.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the ethanol-water solvent comprises at least 93 wt % ethanol.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the ethanol-water solvent comprises at least 97 wt % ethanol.

7. The method of claim 1 where the corn protein yield index is from about 0.55-0.75.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the corn gluten material comprises 50-70 wt % protein on a dry weight basis.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the corn protein concentrate product comprises 55-85 wt % protein on a dry weight basis.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the corn protein concentrate product is for human and animal consumption.