The present invention is directed to systems, components, and methods for forming an epithelial pocket in a cornea of an eye of an individual.
Photo-refractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusius (LASIK), and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusius (LASEK) are procedures performed on patients to improve a patient's vision by ablating intrastromal corneal tissue. PRK and LASIK procedures involve forming a flap of corneal tissue to expose the corneal stroma of an eye undergoing a surgical procedure. Typically, a corneal flap formed during a PRK or LASIK procedure has a thickness greater than 100 micrometers, for example, from about 130 micrometers to about 180 micrometers. Thus, a cut is made into the corneal stroma at a depth greater than 100 micrometers from the anterior or exterior surface of the eye. In comparison, the LASEK procedure involves forming a flap of corneal epithelium or a corneal epithelial flap. The LASEK procedure involves making a cut about 55 micrometers deep (e.g., a depth equal to or slightly greater than the thickness of a healthy adult corneal epithelium), and applying ethanol to loosen the corneal epithelial tissue and facilitate separation of the corneal epithelial flap from the underlying Bowman's membrane.
Examples of microkeratomes and related components useful for cutting corneal tissue in ablative procedures include those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,496,339; 5,690,657; 6,071,293; and U.S. Patent Publication No. 20050251185.
Corneal onlays have been proposed as an alternative to these ablative procedures. A corneal onlay may be understood to be a corneal implant, and more specifically, an implantable ocular device or lens, that is placed on or anterior to Bowman's membrane, for example, between Bowman's membrane of the cornea of an eye and the corneal epithelium of the eye. Since corneal onlays are devices implanted into the eye of a patient, corneal onlays provide the opportunity to improve a patient's vision for long periods of time, but also provide a reversible procedure to correct refractive error. These procedures may result in improvements in a patient's vision without the need for spectacles or contact lenses.
Previously described approaches of using corneal onlays required complete removal or abrasion of the corneal epithelium to expose the underlying Bowman's membrane. It was postulated that placement of a corneal onlay on a deepithelialized Bowman's membrane would be helpful in improving a patient's vision. However, such procedures required corneal epithelial cells to grow and migrate over the corneal onlay, and the procedures presented significant issues of corneal epithelial undergrowth beneath the implanted corneal onlay. More recently, procedures for implanting corneal onlays have been proposed which include implanting a corneal onlay under a corneal epithelial flap or in a corneal epithelial pocket. For example, see U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 20030220653; 20050070942; 20050080484; 20050124982; and 20060052796; and International Patent Publication Nos. WO 2005/030102; WO 2005/049071; and WO 2006/007408.
While covering corneal onlays with corneal epithelial flaps provides some advantages, the corneal onlays may be prone to becoming decentered after the surgical procedure. Corneal epithelial pockets, that is pockets formed between the corneal epithelium and the corneal Bowman's membrane, can be effective in reducing decentration of the implanted corneal onlay after the surgical procedure, among other things.
A need remains for new systems and system components that are effective in forming a pocket between a corneal epithelium of an eye of a patient and the underlying Bowman's membrane. In other words, an existing problem relates to forming a corneal onlay implantation site which is associated with reduced decentration of an implanted corneal onlay compared to an implanted corneal onlay located beneath a corneal epithelial flap. In addition, a need remains for systems and system components which can separate substantially all of the corneal epithelium from the underlying Bowman's membrane to provide an implantation site that is free of epithelial cells. It can be understood that another existing problem relates to forming a corneal epithelial pocket to provide a Bowman's membrane without corneal epithelial cells that can negatively affect a corneal onlay placed in the pocket.
The present corneal epithelial pocket formation systems, components, and methods are relatively easy to use and enable a user, such as a physician, to reliably create a corneal epithelial pocket, that is a pocket between the corneal epithelium and the underlying Bowman's membrane, in an eye of a human patient with little difficulty and little discomfort to the patient. Corneal epithelial pockets formed using the present systems, components, and methods can be formed by or be understood to include a viable corneal epithelium and a Bowman's membrane that is separate from the separated corneal epithelium, and that is substantially free of corneal epithelial cells, for example, that is free of corneal epithelial cells that can negatively impact a corneal onlay or other vision enhancing device placed in the corneal epithelial pocket.
A corneal epithelial pocket formed with the present systems, components, and methods is dimensioned to accommodate a corneal onlay that provides a desired vision improvement or vision correction to the patient, or other suitable ophthalmic device. The present systems and components are configured to form a corneal epithelial pocket, which receives a corneal onlay and is associated with little, if any, movement of the onlay relative to the optic axis or pupil of the eye. For example, a corneal onlay will remain substantially centered relative to the optical axis of the eye when placed in a corneal epithelial pocket produced with the present systems and methods. The incision and pocket formed with the present systems and methods can heal quickly and are not typically associated with significant discomfort to the patient. After placement of a corneal onlay in a corneal epithelial pocket formed with the present systems, components, and methods, a patient's vision can be enhanced or improved for prolonged periods of time, such as months or years, without requiring the use of additional spectacles or contact lenses. The present systems, components, and methods separate a portion of the corneal epithelium from Bowman's membrane, which remains viable during the surgical procedure, during recovery from the surgical procedure, and after the healing period from the surgical procedure. The present systems, components, and methods can separate a portion of the corneal epithelium from Bowman's membrane substantially without leaving residual corneal epithelial cells in contact with Bowman's membrane. With the present systems and methods, the corneal epithelium is separated from Bowman's membrane so that no detectable epithelial cell undergrowth occurs when the corneal onlay is placed in the eye.
Unlike microkeratomes that cut lamellar flaps into the stroma of an eye, the present systems can separate a thinner layer of corneal tissue (i.e., the corneal epithelium) from the underlying Bowman's membrane. In addition, compared to microkeratomes that cut the corneal epithelium to form corneal epithelial flaps, the present systems can separate the corneal epithelium from the underlying Bowman's membrane without forming a corneal epithelial flap and without lifting the corneal epithelium to a degree that negatively affects the viability of the separated corneal epithelium. For example, unlike existing corneal epithelial flap forming systems, the present corneal epithelial pocket formation systems are structured or configured to separate the corneal epithelium from the underlying Bowman's membrane without stretching or otherwise damaging the corneal epithelium during formation of a corneal epithelial pocket. Thus, the separated layer of corneal epithelium that defines a portion of the corneal epithelial pocket is viable, and healing of the eye after a surgery can be facilitated.
Compared to other previously proposed corneal epithelial pocket formation systems, the present systems cleanly separate the corneal epithelium from the underlying Bowman's membrane to reduce the possibility that corneal epithelial cells will remain on Bowman's membrane and may lead to undesirable epithelial cell growth under a corneal onlay or other vision enhancing ophthalmic device placed in the pocket. The present systems, components, and methods are able to provide corneal epithelial pockets suitable for long term accommodation of corneal onlays or other vision enhancing ophthalmic devices due to unique blade configurations and interactions with a blade drive assembly that are not present in existing or previously described corneal epithelial flap or pocket formation systems.
The present systems and components can be structured or configured to form a separated portion of the corneal epithelium that remains attached to non-separated corneal epithelium along a major portion, such as at least about 50% or more than about 50%, of the perimeter of the separated portion of corneal epithelium. The epithelial pocket created with the present systems may be understood to be a cavity or receptacle located between a separated portion of corneal epithelium and the underlying Bowman's membrane. Unlike corneal epithelial flaps which can be folded over a hinge region of corneal epithelium to expose Bowman's membrane, corneal epithelial pockets formed with the present systems, components, and methods can be defined, at least in part, by a separated portion of corneal epithelium that cannot be substantially folded over to expose the underlying Bowman's membrane, for example, without damaging or destroying the separated portion of corneal epithelium.
The present systems comprise a corneal epithelium separator and a drive assembly. The drive assembly causes the corneal epithelium separator to separate a portion of the corneal epithelium from the underlying Bowman's membrane to form a corneal epithelial pocket, as described herein. As used herein, the corneal epithelium separator may also be referred to as a blade.
It has been discovered that in order to obtain a clean separation of the corneal epithelium and the Bowman's membrane and to form a pocket that comprises a viable corneal epithelium, a variety of factors are important in configuring corneal epithelial pocket formation systems. For example, blade orientation can be important. As discussed herein, the blade is oriented, relative to a head of the system or relative to a surface of the eye to be cut, to separate or cut the corneal epithelium from Bowman's membrane without stretching the corneal epithelium to a degree that would adversely affect the viability of the separated corneal epithelium. In addition, blade shape can be important. The present blades are shaped to separate the corneal epithelium from Bowman's membrane without damaging the sides of the pocket formed by the blade. The cutting edge of the blade can be important. For example, it has been found that a tip radius in a range of about 300 nm to about 800 nm is important for obtaining a clean separation of the corneal epithelium from Bowman's membrane. Compared to existing corneal flap formation systems, the blades of the present corneal epithelial pocket formation systems have maximum widths that are less than the maximum widths of the flap forming blades, and the blades of the present systems have lengths that are greater than flap forming blades. The relationship between an applanated area of the eye and the length of the blade cutting edge can also be important. Compared to corneal flap forming systems, the present systems provide an applanation area that has a transverse dimension that is greater than the distance in which the cutting edge of the blade moves. In addition, compared to other systems, controlling the vertical movement of the blade can be important to prevent undesired injury to the Bowman's membrane and reduce friction between the moving blade and other components of the system.
Embodiments of the present systems, components, and methods will be apparent from the following description and claims.
For example, a corneal epithelial pocket formation system comprises a corneal epithelial separator and a drive assembly. The system may comprise a cutting head and the separator or blade is a component of the cutting head. The cutting head can be attached to, coupled to, or otherwise extend from a housing which includes the drive assembly. It can be understood that the cutting head comprises or includes the blade or separator. The cutting head may also comprise an applanator that is structured to act on a portion of a patient's eye to facilitate separation of the corneal epithelium from Bowman's membrane with the blade. The cutting head can include or can be engaged with a suction ring to fix the system and the eye to be cut.
In certain embodiments, the blade or separator is oriented at an angle of about 0° or a 0° angle from a horizontal line relative to the applanated surface of an eye being cut. In certain embodiments, the blade has a distal cutting end that has a maximum width that is greater than a more proximal non-cutting end of the blade. In certain embodiments, the blade has a cutting edge at its distal end that has a tip radius in a range of about 300 nm to about 800 nm. In certain embodiments, the present blades have a maximum width that is less than the maximum width of the corneal epithelial pocket created with the blade. For example, a blade that creates an 8 mm wide pocket can have a maximum width in a range of about 6.5 mm to about 7.5 mm. The present blades can also have a blade length or maximum length that is greater than blade lengths for corneal epithelial flap blades. For example, the present blades may have a maximum length greater than 8 mm. Embodiments of the present blades may have a maximum length of about 14-15 mm. Embodiments of the present systems that include an applanator can also include a blade that has a cutting edge positioned at a distance from the applanator to control the presentation of the corneal epithelium relative to the blade and to control the separation force required to separate the corneal epithelium as a portion of an epithelial pocket without stretching or negatively affecting the viability of the separated corneal epithelium. For example, the distance between the blade cutting edge and the applanator can be greater than 160 micrometers, and in certain embodiments, the distance between the blade cutting edge and the applanator is at least 190 micrometers. Certain embodiments of the present systems comprise a cutting head, which comprises a blade, and a suction ring structured for placement on an eye to be cut. The cutting head can move relative to the suction ring along one or more guidance mechanisms. The guidance mechanisms can be located above the cutting edge of the blade in certain embodiments. Embodiments of systems that include an applanator provide an applanation area on the eye to be cut. The applanation area has a minimum transverse dimension, such as a width, that is greater than the maximum dimension of transversely moving or oscillating blade. As used herein, transverse movement of the blade refers to lateral or crosswise movement of the blade relative to the longitudinal movement of the blade or to the length of the blade. Thus, the cutting edge of the blade does not cut all the way to the edge of the applanated area. This configuration prevents the formation of a corneal epithelial flap and facilitates formation of a corneal epithelial pocket. In certain embodiments, the distance between the suction ring and the applanator is controlled to prevent or reduce damage to or cutting of the distal end of the epithelial pocket by the blade cutting edge. In certain embodiments, the systems comprise a blade holder that is removable from the cutting head. The blade holder is attached to the blade and facilitates guidance of the blade relative to the cutting head. The blade holder can include one or more springs or other biasing members, which may be additional physical components or functional properties of the blade holder, as discussed herein.
In at least one embodiment, including the illustrated embodiment described herein, a corneal epithelial pocket formation system comprises a cutting head that is attached to or extending from a housing member. The cutting head comprises a blade holder and a blade attached thereto. The blade is oriented in the cutting head at a 0° angle from a horizontal line. The blade has a cutting edge at its distal end with a tip radius in a range of about 300 nm to about 800 nm. The blade cutting edge has a width of 6.5 mm to 7.5 mm to create a pocket that has a maximum width of about 8 mm. The blade length is 14.5 mm. The distal end of the blade has a width that is greater than a more proximal region of the blade. For example, a 1-2 mm long blade portion extending from the distal end has a constant width of about 7 mm and the width of the blade narrows or decreases proximally from that 1-2 mm portion. The cutting head includes an applanator and the distance between the blade cutting edge and the applanator is at least 190 micrometers. The applanator provides an applanation area when placed on an eye that has a minimum width that is greater than the maximum width of the moving blade (e.g., greater than 8 mm for this embodiment). The blade is attached to a spring loaded blade holder that is attached to the cutting head. The blade holder is actuated by a motor assembly and the blade holder provides or controls the guidance of the blade relative to the cutting head. The cutting head is attached to a suction ring that is structured for placement on an eye of a patient, and the guidance between the cutting head and the suction ring is located above the blade cutting edge.
Other embodiments of the present invention relate to system components of the systems described herein. For example, an embodiment of the present invention includes the combination of the blade holder and the corneal epithelial pocket forming blade. The combination can be understood to be a corneal epithelial pocket cutting assembly. The assembly can be separately packaged and provided in sterile conditions to be attached to a cutting head of the present systems. After use, the cutting assembly can be disposed or sterilized and reused if desired. In certain embodiments, disposable cutting assemblies are desirable to minimize potential for contamination and to reduce the additional work required to sterilize medical instruments. Further embodiments relate to the corneal epithelial pocket forming blades which can be provided separately from the blade holder or the systems in general.
Embodiments of the present invention also related to methods of using the present systems and system components. For example, embodiments include methods of enhancing vision of a patient using the systems and/or system components described herein. Embodiments also include the use of the present blades, cutting assemblies, and other components in the manufacture of a medical or surgical device for enhancing vision of a patient.
As can be appreciated from the foregoing and following description, each and every feature described herein, and each and every combination of two or more of such features, is included within the scope of the present invention provided that the features included in such a combination are not mutually inconsistent. In addition, any feature or combination of features may be specifically excluded from any embodiment of the present invention.
Additional aspects and advantages of the present invention are set forth in the following description and claims, particularly when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The present corneal epithelial pocket formation systems, components, and methods are effective in forming a corneal epithelial pocket in an eye of a patient, such as a human patient. The epithelial pockets are dimensioned to accommodate a corneal implant that is placed in the pocket to enhance, improve, or correct a patient's vision. Corneal implants which can be placed in the epithelial pockets include ophthalmic devices with or without refractive powers. Thus, corneal implants can refer to devices such as lenses, filters, blanks, and the like. In certain embodiments, the corneal implants are lenses and are referred to herein as corneal onlays. The present systems, components, and methods result in a portion of corneal epithelium that has been separated from the underlying Bowman's membrane. The separated portion of corneal epithelium remains viable during and after the surgical procedure.
The human cornea consists of five layers, namely, the corneal epithelium, the Bowman's membrane, the stroma, Descemet's membrane, and the endothelium. The corneal epithelium usually is about 5-6 cell layers thick (approximately 50-55 micrometers thick), and generally regenerates when the cornea is injured. The corneal epithelium lines the anterior or exterior surface of cornea, provides a relatively smooth refractive surface, and helps prevent infection of the eye. The corneal stroma is a laminated structure of collagen which contains cells, such as fibroblasts and keratocytes, dispersed therein. The stroma constitutes about 90% of the corneal thickness. The anterior portion of the stroma, which underlies the epithelium, is a cellular and is known as Bowman's membrane. Bowman's membrane is located between the epithelium and the stroma and is believed to protect the cornea from injury. The corneal endothelium typically is a monolayer of low cuboidal or squamous cells that dehydrates the cornea by removing water from the cornea. An adult human cornea is typically about 500 μm (0.5 mm) thick and is typically devoid of blood vessels.
The present systems, components, and methods form corneal epithelial pockets that are dimensioned to accommodate a corneal implant. As used herein, and as described above, a corneal epithelial pocket can be understood to be a cavity, void, or corneal implant receptacle defined between a separated portion of corneal epithelium and the underlying Bowman's membrane. Thus, a corneal epithelial pocket can be defined by a separated portion of corneal epithelium and the underlying Bowman's membrane. Unlike corneal epithelial flaps, the present corneal epithelial pockets include a separated portion of corneal epithelium that remains attached to the Bowman's membrane along a major portion of the perimeter of the separated portion. For example, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, or at least 90% of the perimeter of the separated portion remains attached to Bowman's membrane. Thus, a small incision can be made in the epithelium through which a corneal epithelial separator can be inserted to form a cavity that is substantially perimetrically surrounded by corneal epithelium that is attached to Bowman's membrane.
Importantly, corneal epithelial pockets can be formed without exposing the eye to ethanol and without forming an epithelial flap. The separated portion of corneal epithelium remains viable, and is cleanly separated from the underlying Bowman's membrane so that epithelial cells do not grow, migrate, or divide between the corneal implant placed in the pocket and the underlying Bowman's membrane.
Reference will now be made in detail to the present embodiments of the invention, some examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same or similar reference numbers are used in the drawings and the description to refer to the same or like parts. It should be noted that the drawings are in simplified form and are not to precise scale. In reference to the disclosure herein, for purposes of convenience and clarity only, directional terms, such as, top, bottom, left, right, up, down, over, above, below, beneath, rear, front, backward, forward, horizontal, vertical, distal, proximal, anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, temporal, and nasal are used with respect to the accompanying drawings. Such directional terms should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention in any manner.
Although the disclosure herein refers to certain embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are presented by way of example and not by way of limitation. The intent of the following detailed description, although discussing exemplary embodiments, is to be construed to cover all modifications, alternatives, and equivalents of the embodiments.
In reference to
The blade 34 is oriented when coupled to the cutting head 20 so that a viable separated portion of corneal epithelium is maintained during formation of a corneal epithelial pocket. This viable separated portion of corneal epithelium can be understood to be a pocket-defining portion of corneal epithelium. For example, the present blades 34 are oriented so that during formation of a corneal epithelial pocket, the corneal epithelium is not substantially lifted, stretched, or otherwise injured in a manner that would negatively affect the viability of the corneal epithelium. Maintaining a viable corneal epithelium is important to improve the likelihood of a successful vision correcting or vision enhancing procedure. Unlike systems that form corneal epithelial flaps, the present systems are able to separate a portion or layer of corneal epithelium that remains attached to non-separated portions of corneal epithelium without stretching the corneal epithelium. In certain embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment, the blade 34 is oriented at an angle of about 0° or at about a 0° angle relative to the longitudinal movement path of the blade during the formation of the corneal epithelial pocket. An example of the longitudinal movement path is shown by arrow A in
The system 10 illustrated in
The housing 12 and components thereof can be similar to microkeratome housings described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,071,293 or U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2005/0251185. In addition, the housing 12 may be similarly or identically structured to an epithelial flap forming microkeratome system available from Gebauer GmbH (Germany) under the tradename, EPIVISION™.
As shown in
The cutting head 20 is engageable with a suction ring 28. The suction ring 28 includes a vacuum connector 30 and one or more driving pins 32.
As shown in
While the present corneal epithelial pocket forming blades 34 may have a variety of shapes and dimensions, certain embodiments have a maximum width 57 equal to the length of the cutting edge surface 52 of the blade 34. Furthermore, embodiments of the present blades 34 can have a maximum width 57 at the distal end 51 of the blade 34, and a second width 59 at a more proximal location that is less than the maximum width 57. Still further, the blade 34 may have a distal portion 53 that has a width 57 effective in forming a corneal epithelial pocket that includes first and second lateral epithelial pocket edges attached to Bowman's membrane during transverse oscillation of the blade, and an adjacent proximal portion 55 that has a width 59 effective in preventing contact of the proximal portion 55 with the first or second lateral pocket edges during oscillation of the blade.
The blade 34 also has a proximal end 49 and includes an aperture 50 structured to contact a protrusion member 48 of the blade holder 26. The protrusion member 48 can act as a centering mechanism for the blade 34, and is represented by a portion of the blade holder 26 that extends downwardly to engage with aperture 50 of the blade 34. The blade holder 26 can also include one or more vertical securement devices, which in the illustrated embodiment are shown as a plurality of hooks 46.
As shown in
As evident from the figures, the blade holder 26 can be understood to be a removable blade holder that can be inserted into and removed from the cutting head 20. The blade holder 26 of the illustrated embodiment is a spring loaded blade holder. For example, using one or more biasing forces, the blade holder 26 can provide a desired guidance of the blade 34 during a surgical procedure. Unlike corneal epithelial flap producing systems in which the entire blade is guided by the cutting head, the present systems primarily guide the blade 34 using the spring loaded removable blade holder 26, and only guide the proximal end of the blade 34 with the cutting head. In the illustrated embodiment, the blade holder 26 is formed from a resilient material, such as plastic materials, that have an inherent resiliency incorporated into the formed blade holder. The particular configuration of the blade holder 26 and the spring forces provided by the blade holder can be empirically determined using routine methods known to persons of ordinary skill in the art. For example, the blade holder 26 is structured or configured to reduce vertical movement of the blade 34, including the cutting edge surface 52, during a cutting procedure. Vertical movement of the blade can be especially significant and cause injury to the eye due to the length of the blade, especially when compared to blade lengths of epithelial flap forming blades and related microkeratomes. In addition, the resiliency of the blade holder can be selected to minimize the friction between one or more portions of the blade holder and one or more portions of the cutting head that may result in damage to the cutting head.
An exploded view of the cutting assembly and the cutting head 20 are shown in
The applanator 58 provides an applanation area on an eye on which the surgical procedure is being performed. In the illustrated embodiment, the applanation area has a minimum width that is greater than the maximum transverse dimension of the distal end 51 of the blade 34 during oscillation of the blade. For example, the width of the applanation area is greater than the maximum width spanned by the oscillating blade. By providing a wider applanation area, it is possible to cut a portion of the corneal epithelium without contacting the sides of the applanated area and thereby reduce or prevent cutting of the sides of the cut portion. By maintaining the integrity of the sides of the separated corneal epithelium, corneal epithelial pockets can be effectively produced. In comparison, epithelial flap forming systems cut a portion of the corneal epithelium that is greater than the applanation area thereby only providing an attached region at the distal end of the cutting path.
The distance between the cutting edge surface 52 and the applanator 58 can be important for controlling the angle in which the corneal tissue is presented to the cutting edge surface 52, and determining how large the separation force required to separate the epithelium from Bowman's membrane. In certain embodiments, the distance between the applanator and the cutting edge surface is greater than 160 micrometers. In additional embodiments, the distance is at least 190 micrometers or more.
When the blade holder 26 is engaged with the cutting head 20, the blade cutting edge surface 52 is located between the cornea contacting portion 27 of the suction ring 28 and the cutting head guiding portion 44 of the suction ring during formation of the corneal epithelial pocket.
In view of the disclosure herein, it can be appreciated that the present systems and components can include one or more elements or features to provide corneal epithelial pockets in an eye of a human patient. For example, one embodiment of the present systems can include a suction ring 28, a cutting head 20, and a housing 12. The suction ring 28 includes a cornea contacting portion 27 and an opposing cutting head guidance portion 44. The cutting head 20 is in contact with the cutting head guidance portion 44 of the suction ring 28. The cutting head 20 includes an applanator 58 that is structured, such as sized and shaped, to provide an applanation area on the cornea of an eye during a corneal epithelial pocket forming procedure. The cutting head 20 also includes a spring loaded blade holder 26, and a blade 34 extending from the spring loaded blade holder 26 at about a 0° angle from a straight line extending along a longitudinal guidance path (arrow A in
The present components can be used to produce a corneal epithelial pocket formation system, as described herein. The use or method of producing a corneal epithelial pocket formation system includes providing a corneal epithelial pocket forming blade, such as the blades disclosed herein, retained by a spring loaded blade holder, and engaging the blade holder with a cutting head of a motorized device. For example, the illustrated cutting assembly can be attached to the cutting head 20 described herein. The blade of the engaged blade holder is oriented to maintain a viable separated pocket defining portion of corneal epithelium of an eye of a patient during formation of the corneal epithelial pocket of the eye.
The components of the present systems can be produced from conventional materials used in production of medical and surgical instruments. For example, materials from which the present components can be produced include plastic materials and metal materials. For example, the blade holder 26 can be formed of plastic. The blade 34 can be formed from stainless steel or other suitable materials. The blade can be coated or otherwise modified to provide a smooth surface with a small coefficient of friction to reduce damage to the corneal epithelium. The components can be machined or formed using any conventional method known to persons of ordinary skill in the art.
The present systems can be used in methods of enhancing vision of a patient by forming a corneal epithelial pocket in an eye of a patient. For example, one method may include administering an anesthetic to the patient, such as by topically administering an anesthetic composition to the eye of the patient, and placing the suction ring 28 on the eye of the patient and applying a vacuum to the suction ring. The cutting head 20 can be engaged with the suction ring 28. The blade 34 can be actuated to move forward and oscillate from left to right to cut the corneal epithelium. The separated portion of corneal epithelium passes over the top of the blade 34 without substantially stretching or damaging the epithelial cells. When an epithelial pocket of a desired length has been produced, the oscillation of the blade can be stopped and the blade can be withdrawn. Subsequently, a corneal implant can be placed in the corneal epithelial pocket. The methods may also include administering cool saline compositions to the eye, such as by applying saline eye drops which are provided at a temperature less than 20° C., for example, between about 4° C. and about 15° C., to the eye.
The present invention also relates to components of the present systems. For example, an embodiment of the present invention includes a package which includes a corneal epithelial pocket forming blade, such as the blades disclosed herein, and a spring loaded blade holder, such as the blade holders disclosed herein. The spring loaded blade holder is removably engageable with a cutting head of a motorized device, as described herein. The blade holder is structured to retain the blade at an orientation effective in maintaining a viable separated pocket defining portion of corneal epithelium of an eye of a patient during formation of the corneal epithelial pocket of the eye when the blade holder is engaged with the cutting head. In certain embodiments, the blade and blade holder of the present packages are sterilized. Thus, examples of the blade and blade holders can be ready for single use and disposed of after formation of a corneal epithelial pocket.
Another embodiment of the present invention relates to blades for corneal epithelial pocket formation systems. The present blades 34 comprise a distal end portion 53 and an adjacent proximal portion 55, as shown in
While this invention has been described with respect to various specific examples and embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto and that it can be variously practiced with the scope of the following claims.
A number of publications and patents have been cited hereinabove. Each of the cited publications and patents is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/790,874, filed Apr. 10, 2006, the contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4078564 | Spina et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4126904 | Shepard | Nov 1978 | A |
4223984 | Miyata et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4268131 | Miyata et al. | May 1981 | A |
4346482 | Tennant et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4452235 | Reynolds | Jun 1984 | A |
4452776 | Refojo | Jun 1984 | A |
4452925 | Kuzma et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4563779 | Kelman | Jan 1986 | A |
4581030 | Bruns et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4600533 | Chu | Jul 1986 | A |
4619657 | Keates et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4621912 | Meyer | Nov 1986 | A |
4624669 | Grendahl | Nov 1986 | A |
4636210 | Hoffer | Jan 1987 | A |
4655774 | Choyce | Apr 1987 | A |
4655980 | Chu | Apr 1987 | A |
4676790 | Kern | Jun 1987 | A |
4689399 | Chu | Aug 1987 | A |
4693715 | Abel, Jr. | Sep 1987 | A |
4715858 | Lindstrom | Dec 1987 | A |
4725671 | Chu et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4780409 | Monji et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4784485 | Ho | Nov 1988 | A |
4799931 | Lindstrom | Jan 1989 | A |
4810082 | Abel, Jr. | Mar 1989 | A |
4819617 | Goldberg et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4834748 | McDonald | May 1989 | A |
4851003 | Lindstrom | Jul 1989 | A |
4923467 | Thompson | May 1990 | A |
4952212 | Booth et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4959353 | Brown et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4973493 | Guire | Nov 1990 | A |
4978713 | Goldenberg | Dec 1990 | A |
4979959 | Guire | Dec 1990 | A |
4981841 | Gibson | Jan 1991 | A |
4983181 | Civerchia | Jan 1991 | A |
4994081 | Civerchia | Feb 1991 | A |
5019097 | Knight et al. | May 1991 | A |
5044743 | Ting | Sep 1991 | A |
5104408 | Thompson | Apr 1992 | A |
5108428 | Capecchi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5112350 | Civerchia | May 1992 | A |
5114627 | Civerchia | May 1992 | A |
5151310 | Yanagisawa et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5156622 | Thompson | Oct 1992 | A |
5163956 | Liu et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5171318 | Gibson et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5192316 | Ting | Mar 1993 | A |
5196026 | Barrett et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5196027 | Thompson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5201764 | Kelman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5213720 | Civerchia | May 1993 | A |
5244799 | Anderson | Sep 1993 | A |
5263992 | Guire | Nov 1993 | A |
5288436 | Liu et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5292514 | Capecchi et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5300118 | Silvestrini et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5330911 | Hubbell et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5401508 | Manesis | Mar 1995 | A |
5433745 | Graham et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443473 | Miller et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5470831 | Whitman et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475052 | Rhee et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489300 | Capecchi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5496339 | Koepnick | Mar 1996 | A |
5522888 | Civerchia | Jun 1996 | A |
5547468 | Simon et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552452 | Khadem et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5565519 | Rhee et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5587175 | Viegas et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5614587 | Rhee et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5632773 | Graham et al. | May 1997 | A |
5683592 | Bartholomew et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5690657 | Koepnick | Nov 1997 | A |
5713957 | Steele et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716633 | Civerchia | Feb 1998 | A |
5722971 | Peyman | Mar 1998 | A |
5744545 | Rhee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5800541 | Rhee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827641 | Parenteau et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832313 | Ishibashi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836313 | Perez et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5919185 | Peyman | Jul 1999 | A |
5964748 | Peyman | Oct 1999 | A |
5994133 | Meijs et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015609 | Chaouk et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6030634 | Wu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6055990 | Thompson | May 2000 | A |
6060530 | Chaouk et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063073 | Peyman | May 2000 | A |
6071293 | Krumeich | Jun 2000 | A |
6086204 | Magnante | Jul 2000 | A |
6090995 | Reich et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099541 | Klopotek | Aug 2000 | A |
6103528 | An et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6165488 | Tardy et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6186148 | Okada | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197019 | Peyman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203538 | Peyman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6217571 | Peyman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221067 | Peyman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6271278 | Park et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280470 | Peyman | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284537 | Offord et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6323278 | Rhee et al. | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6335006 | Miller et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6361560 | Nigam | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6384105 | He et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388047 | Won et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6454800 | Dalton et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6454802 | Bretton et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6511949 | Nitta et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6544286 | Perez | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547391 | Ross, III et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551307 | Peyman | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6566406 | Pathak et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579918 | Auten et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585375 | Donitzky et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596006 | Hanna | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6599305 | Feingold | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6607522 | Hamblin et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623498 | Ziemer | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6645715 | Griffith et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6689165 | Jacob et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6702807 | Peyman | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6717651 | Kato et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6855163 | Pallikaris et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6880558 | Perez | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6897064 | Yoshioka et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6918904 | Peyman | Jul 2005 | B1 |
7004953 | Pallikaris et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7053051 | Hendriks et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7077839 | Hamblin et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7156859 | Pallikaris et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7166118 | Dame et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7207998 | Feingold | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20010018612 | Carson et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027314 | Peyman | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010034516 | Peyman | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047203 | Dalton et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020007217 | Jacob et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022013 | Leukel et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020039788 | Isseroff et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020052596 | Pallikaris et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052615 | Ross et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055753 | Silvestrini | May 2002 | A1 |
20020065555 | Nigam | May 2002 | A1 |
20020071097 | Ross, III et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020138069 | Peyman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030018123 | Bagrov et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018347 | Pallikaris et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018348 | Pallikaris et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030093083 | Peyman | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105521 | Perez | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030220653 | Perez | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015234 | Peyman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040046287 | Andino et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040075807 | Ho et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040125459 | Tanitsu et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040142038 | Echols et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040170666 | Keates et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040183998 | Luce | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040243160 | Shiuey et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050070942 | Perez | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050080484 | Marmo et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050124982 | Perez | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050196427 | Tirrell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251185 | Gebauer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259221 | Marmo | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060034807 | Griffith | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060052796 | Perez et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064112 | Perez | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060071356 | Beebe | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060134050 | Griffith et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060134170 | Griffith et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060190004 | Dick et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060241751 | Marmo et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060246113 | Griffith et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247660 | Perez | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070016292 | Perez | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026046 | Fogg et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070182920 | Back et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070265649 | Perez | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080024723 | Marmo | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080269119 | Griffith | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2134744 | May 1995 | CA |
2286718 | Nov 1998 | CA |
2227827 | Jul 1999 | CA |
199 47 711 | May 2001 | DE |
0 387 975 | Sep 1990 | EP |
1 530 600 | May 2005 | EP |
1 741 457 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1 569 707 | Jun 1980 | GB |
2305608 | Apr 1997 | GB |
WO 8802622 | Apr 1988 | WO |
WO 9214420 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 9307889 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9416570 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO 9417851 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO 9513764 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9803267 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9831316 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9937752 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 0007525 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0035524 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0067694 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0206883 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02092142 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 02092142 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 2004014969 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004015090 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO 2004024035 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004028356 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004052254 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2005030102 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005042043 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005049071 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005116729 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006007408 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006015490 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006020859 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006116601 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2006116732 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2007028258 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070239184 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60790874 | Apr 2006 | US |