All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
Corneal implants can correct vision impairment by positioning them on corneal tissue by creating a change in curvature of the anterior surface of a cornea and/or creating multifocalities within the cornea due to intrinsic properties of the implant. Corneal implants include onlays and inlays, but as used herein can also refer to contact lenses, or even to corneal replacement devices. An onlay is an implant that is placed over the stromal part of the cornea such that the outer layer of the cornea, i.e., the epithelium, can grow over and encompass the implant. An inlay is an implant that is implanted within corneal tissue beneath a portion of the corneal tissue by, for example, cutting a flap in the cornea and inserting the inlay beneath the flap. Both inlays and onlays can alter the refractive power of the cornea by changing the shape of the anterior cornea, by having a different index of refraction than the cornea, or both.
There is a need for improved apparatuses, systems and methods for inserting a corneal implant onto corneal tissue, including inserting it within a pocket created in the corneal tissue.
One aspect of the disclosure is a corneal implant inserter apparatus, comprising: a holding space at a distal end of an elongate body, wherein the holding space is adapted to house a corneal implant therein in a substantially unstressed configuration; a fluid disposed in the holding space such that the corneal implant is retained within the holding space due to the surface tension of the fluid; and a channel extending within the elongate body such that the channel is in fluid communication with the holding space.
In some embodiments the channel has a maximum width that is less than a maximum width of the holding space. The channel maximum width can be less than half of the maximum width of the holding space.
In some embodiments the holding space has a generally flat top and a generally flat bottom. The corneal implant can be a corneal inlay with an anterior surface that is substantially parallel to the generally flat top and a posterior surface that is substantially parallel to the generally flat bottom.
In some embodiments the channel extends from the holding space to a proximal end of the elongate body.
In some embodiments the holding space and the channel are together adapted to hold between about 0.5 and about 4.0 microliters therein.
One aspect of the disclosure is a corneal implant inserter apparatus, comprising: a holding space at a distal end of an elongate body, wherein the holding space is adapted to house a corneal implant therein; a channel with a maximum width less than a maximum width of the holding space, wherein the channel is in fluid communication with the holding space and extends from the holding space within the elongate body.
In some embodiments the channel maximum width is less than half of the holding space maximum width.
In some embodiments the channel extends from the holding space to a proximal end of the elongate body.
In some embodiments the corneal implant is retained within the holding space in a substantially unstressed configuration. The holding space can have a generally flat top and a generally flat bottom, and wherein the corneal implant can be a corneal inlay with an anterior surface that is substantially parallel to the generally flat top and a posterior surface that is substantially parallel to the generally flat bottom.
In some embodiment the apparatus further comprises a fluid disposed in the holding space such that the corneal implant is retained within the holding space due to the surface tension of the fluid.
In some embodiment the holding space has a generally flat top and a generally flat bottom.
In some embodiments the holding space and the channel are together adapted to hold between about 0.5 and about 4.0 microliters therein.
One aspect of the disclosure is a corneal implant inserter apparatus, comprising: an elongate body comprising a distal holding space in fluid communication with a channel extending through the elongate body, wherein the holding space has a generally flat top and a generally flat bottom; and a corneal implant retained in the holding space between the generally flat top and the generally flat bottom.
In some embodiments the apparatus further comprises a fluid disposed in the holding space such that the corneal implant is retained within the holding space due to the surface tension of the fluid. The corneal implant can be retained in the holding space in a substantially unstressed configuration. The corneal implant can have an anterior surface that is substantially parallel to the generally flat top and a posterior surface that is substantially parallel to the generally flat bottom.
In some embodiments the channel has a maximum width that is less than a maximum width of the holding space.
In some embodiments the channel extends from the holding space to a proximal end of the elongate body.
In some embodiments the holding space and the channel are together adapted to hold between about 0.5 and about 4.0 microliters therein.
One aspect of the disclosure is a corneal implant inserter system, comprising: a corneal implant inserter comprising a channel fluidly connecting a holding space in a distal portion of the inserter and a proximal end of the corneal implant inserter; a fluid disposed in the holding space such that a corneal implant is retained in the holding space due to the surface tension of the fluid; and a fluid delivery device adapted to be positioned relative to the corneal implant inserter such that it is in fluid communication with the corneal implant inserter channel such that fluid can be delivered from the fluid delivery device into the channel to deploy the corneal implant from the holding space.
In some embodiments the system further comprises a hub that is adapted to receive a proximal end of the corneal implant inserter therein, and wherein the hub is adapted to engage the fluid delivery device such that the fluid delivery device, the hub, the channel, and the holding space are in fluid communication.
One aspect of the disclosure a method of deploying a corneal implant onto corneal tissue, comprising: providing a corneal implant inserter with a corneal implant retained in a holding space in a substantially unstressed configuration in a distal region of the inserter; and delivering fluid from a delivery device into a channel extending through the corneal implant inserter, wherein the channel is in fluid communication with the holding space, and wherein delivering the fluid deploys the corneal implant from the holding space and onto corneal tissue.
In some embodiments the method further comprises creating a corneal flap and lifting the flap to expose the corneal tissue prior to the delivering step.
In some embodiments the method further comprises applying a force on the corneal implant with a tool to assist in deploying the corneal implant from the holding space.
In some embodiments applying a force on the implant with a second tool comprises positioning the tool in a slot formed in a top portion of the holding space.
In some embodiments the method further comprises, prior to the delivering step: creating a corneal pocket within the cornea; creating an access channel to the pocket; and advancing the holding space into the access channel and towards the pocket.
In some embodiments the method further comprises: creating a second access channel to the pocket; positioning a tool in the second access channel; and applying a force on the corneal implant with the tool to assist in deploying the corneal implant from the holding space.
The disclosure herein generally describes devices that are adapted to insert corneal implants onto corneal tissue, and their methods of use. The methods of use include inserting the corneal implants into a pocket created in the cornea. The methods of use also include inserting the corneal implants onto corneal tissue after a flap has been created in the cornea. Some devices are adapted to deliver fluid to an implant holding space to at least assist in the deployment of the implant from the holding space and onto corneal tissue.
The distal portion of inserter 100 further includes holding space 101 that is adapted to receive corneal implant 200 therein. Saline, BSS, or any other suitable solution (not shown in
As can be seen in
Exemplary corneal inlays that can be positioned onto corneal tissue using the inserter devices and methods of use herein can be found described in U.S. Pat. No. 8,057,541, filed Oct. 30, 2006; U.S. Pub. No. 2008/0262610, filed Apr. 20, 2007; U.S. Pub. No. 2009/0198325, filed Apr. 3, 2009; U.S. Pub. No. 2011/0218623, filed Sep. 8, 2010, all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
In some embodiments inserter 100 is manufactured from a rod that is cut and bent to form the configuration of inserter 100 shown in
The exemplary inserter system in
In an exemplary method of use, the implant is preloaded into the holding space of the inserter and packaged for later use by the physician or other user during an implantation procedure. In this embodiment, the implant is preloaded into the holding space of the inserter with the top, or anterior, surface of the implant orientated to face the top surface of the inserter. The implant may be preloaded by submerging both the implant and the holding space of the inserter in a solution (e.g., saline) and inserting the implant into the holding space while they are both submerged. After the implant is preloaded in the inserter, the inserter cap is positioned on the distal end of the inserter. The cap may be placed on the inserter while the holding space is still submerged in the solution. The preloaded inserter assembled with the inserter cap is placed into vial 400 or other storage container filled with saline 410 or other suitable solution as shown in
An exemplary implantation procedure using the exemplary insertion system shown in
To enable a user to better hold inserter 100, handle 500 may be attached to the proximal end of inserter 100 as shown in
Additionally, the user may determine the proper orientation of the implant based on features of inserter 100. For example, when the top of inserter 100, and hence implant 200, are facing upward, the concave bottom surface of curved portion 103 is facing downward.
In embodiments in which an inlay is being implanted, after the cap has been removed, the user may then implant the corneal implant in or on the patient's cornea. In some embodiments the corneal implant is positioned under a flap created in the cornea. Techniques to create corneal flaps are known, such as by mechanical methods or using a laser. Once created, the flap is then lifted to expose the cornea's interior, e.g., stroma bed of the cornea. An example of this is shown in
Implant 200 may be implanted concurrent with a LASIK procedure or post-LASIK. Since a flap is cut into the cornea during a LASIK procedure, the same flap may be used to implant the corneal implant. If the implant is implanted post-LASIK, then the LASIK flap may be re-opened or the inserter may be advanced between the flap and the underlying corneal tissue to the desired position. In this example, the LASIK procedure may be used to correct distance vision while the implant is used to provide near vision. Additional details can be found, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/554,544, entitled “Small Diameter Inlays,” filed on Oct. 30, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,057,541, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The implants can be positioned under a newly created and opened flap, a previously created and re-opened flap, a newly created but unopened flap (e.g., a femtosecond laser makes a flap but it is not lifted and perhaps all of the corneal tags are not broken), a previously created and unopened flap, or an actual purpose-made pocket/channel.
In embodiments in which the implant is positioned under a flap that is not opened (whether newly created or previously created) the distal portion of the inserter may be inserted between the flap and the underlying corneal tissue and advanced between the flap and underlying corneal tissue to the desired position in the cornea. The distal portion of the inserter preferably has a thin cross-section so that the inserter does not induce corneal stretching. The curved portion of the inserter follows the curvature of the cornea allowing the inserter to more easily move between the flap and underlying corneal tissue while minimizing stress on the cornea. Further, the top surface of the inserter preferably has a downward sloping portion 115 that slopes downward to the leading edge of the inserter as shown in
The devices and systems described herein can also be used in the delivery of corneal implants using different methods to access the interior of the cornea. For example, the interior of the cornea may be accessed through a lamellar pocket, channel, or pathway cut into the cornea. A “pocket” is generally referred to as a recess formed within the corneal tissue for receiving the corneal implant, and which may be accessed via a channel formed in the cornea. Methods of creating pockets are known, such as may be found described in United States Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0014042, published Jan. 16, 2003, entitled “Method of Creating Stromal Pockets for Corneal Implants,” which is also fully incorporated by reference herein. Additional exemplary methods and devices for creating corneal pockets, or corneal channels, can be found in U.S. Pub. No. 2012/0046680, filed Aug. 23, 2010, the disclosure of which is fully incorporated by reference herein.
In an exemplary method of use, the inserter may be inserted into a channel or pocket cut into the cornea and advanced through the channel to position the implant at the desired location in the corneal pocket. A second channel may also be cut into the cornea to provide access for a surgical cannula or other tool used to hold down the implant at the desired location.
Distal portion 226 has a generally flat configuration. Upper surface 238 is substantially flat, with surface 244 tapering slightly downward towards the distal end of distal portion 226. Bottom surface 240 is substantially flat and extends from the bend in intermediate region 224 to the distal end of distal portion 226.
In this embodiment holding area 246 and implant 236 are sized and shaped such that implant 236 is disposed within holding area 246 in a substantially non-deformed, or non-stressed, configuration. The substantially non-deformed configuration is substantially the same configuration that the implant is in after it is positioned in or on the subject's cornea. This can be beneficial since the implant might be retained in the holding space for an extended period of time, such as during shipping and storage prior to use. Keeping the implant in a substantially non-stressed, or non-deformed configuration, can reduce the likelihood of damage and increase the shelf-life of the implant. In some embodiments the implant is a corneal inlay that is adapted to be implanted within the cornea to treat presbyopia. The inlay has a diameter between about 1 mm about 3.5 mm. The relatively small diameter size allows for the width of the holding space to be relatively small and still be adapted to house the inlay therein in a non-deformed and substantially non-stressed configuration. The relatively small width of the inserter also reduces the likelihood of damage to corneal tissue when the inlay is positioned into a pocket via an access channel.
The dimensions and tolerances provided in
Distal portion 226 also includes removal slot 228 that extends through the top and bottom surfaces of the distal portion. A removal tool can be positioned within the slot as described above to apply a gentle force to the implant while the inserter 220 is retracted, thereby removing the implant from the inserter and onto the corneal bed, as is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 8,162,953, filed Mar. 28, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Device 220 shown in
The inserter in
Due to the indentations, device 250 has less material in the distal section 256 that the device in
While device 250 has a tear-drop configuration, any distal portion configuration that does not have completely flat sides in a top view of the device can be used to help provide better visualization of the eye. Additionally, the device in
The inserter 280 also includes a top inserter slot 286 through which a surgical cannula, Sinskey Hook, or other tool can be used to hold down implant 282 at the desired location in the cornea as described above. Cannula 280 also includes a bottom opening 288 shown in
Implant 282 can be implanted in the cornea using any of the procedures described above. In one embodiment a flap is cut into the cornea and lifted to expose a stroma bed of the cornea. The user then positions implant 282 at the desired location using the inserter. When implant 282 is at the desired position, the user can use a surgical cannula or other tool to hold implant 282 through the top inserter slot 286. The user can hold down implant 282 such that the bottom surface of implant 282 contacts the cornea through bottom opening 288. While implant 282 is held down at the desired location, the user retracts the inserter to deposit implant 282 on the cornea. The surgeon can alternatively, or in addition to, deliver fluid to implant 282 through the channel in the inserter to release implant 282 from the holding space. After implant 282 is correctly positioned, the user places the flap back down over implant 282.
In some embodiments implant 282 is implanted into a corneal pocket. Cannula 280 is moved to the desired position through the channel that leads to the pocket. The thin cross section of cannula 280 minimizes stress on the cornea as cannula 280 is advanced through the channel to the pocket. When the implant is in position, fluid is delivered from the fluid delivery device, through the cannula, and into the holding space to thereby deploy the inlay out of the holding space and onto the corneal tissue. In alternative embodiments a second channel can also be cut into the cornea to provide access for a surgical tool that can be used to hold down implant 282 to further assist removing the implant from the holding space, as is described in more detail above.
In some embodiments system 310 is used to deliver the implant after a flap has been created. In some embodiments system 310 is used to deliver the implant into a pocket formed within the cornea. In some methods of use the implant is deployed from the holding space and onto corneal tissue solely by advancing fluid through channel 320 from the syringe. In some embodiments a separate stripping tool can also be used to assist in the removal of the implant from the holding space, as is described above.
The distal end of device 312 could have a different configuration than shown, such as a tear-drop configuration shown above. Proximal region 368 of inserter 312 has a slightly smaller width than the region distal to it, as shown in
As can be seen, the channel has a width that is less than the maximum width of the holding area. In the distal region of the inserter the side walls that form the channel taper outward and form the larger width holding space. The width of the holding space is such that the implant can be housed therein in a substantially non-stressed configuration, while the smaller width of the channel requires less fluid to be advanced through the inserter to deploy the implant.
In some embodiments herein (such as
In some embodiments the width of the implant can be between about 1 mm and about 3 mm. By way of additional example, in some embodiments the implant diameter is about 1 mm and the holding space maximum width is about 1.2 mm. In alternative exemplary embodiments the implant diameter is about 3.0 mm and the holding space width is about 3.2 mm.
In some embodiments the height of the implant, which can also be considered the “thickness” of the implant is between about 10 microns and about 50 microns. The height of the holding space is just slightly larger than the height of the implant. For example, in some embodiments the implant height, or thickness, is between about 20 microns and about 40 microns, and the respective holding space height is between about 22 microns and about 50 microns. In some embodiments the implant height is about 30 microns and the holding space height is about 35 microns. Again, in these embodiments the relatively small height of the holding space (and the overall height of the distal portion of the inserter) reduces the delivery profile and minimizes damage to the cornea.
As shown in
In the embodiment shown in
When delivering a corneal inlay onto corneal tissue using fluid (whether or not a separate tool is also used to assist in the delivery), the amount of fluid delivered onto the cornea can influence the procedure. For example, it is generally not beneficial to deliver a relatively large volume of fluid onto the cornea because it will take a longer period of time for a larger volume of fluid to evaporate (or dissipate if within the cornea), which increases the time it takes for the implant to adhere to the corneal bed. A relatively large volume of fluid can also make visualizing the implant more difficult and makes it difficult to control the position of the implant relative to the pupil. Conversely, providing too little fluid can cause the implant to stick to the stroma and surgical instruments and can therefore be difficult to move and reposition.
Additionally, it is generally desirable to minimize the pressure on the corneal tissue bed to prevent damage to the eye. It is therefore generally important to carefully control the amount of fluid that is pushed out of the inserter system to deliver the corneal implant. In some embodiments between about 0.5 to about 2.0 microliters of saline are advanced into the fluid channel within the delivery device. This range is not, however, intended to be strictly limiting. For example, about 5 microliters could be used as well. In some embodiments between about 0.5 and about 1.0 microliters of fluid are advanced. In some embodiments between about 1.0 and about 2.0 microliters are used. In some embodiments, however, more fluid can be delivered, and the excess fluid could simply be aspirated or removed. The inserter bodies described herein can hold approximately between about 0.5 and about 4.0 microliters, but in other embodiments the inserters can be modified to hold more or less fluid.
Pocket 426 can be created by known methods, such as by focusing a laser beam at corneal tissue, and moving the laser beam throughout the region of corneal tissue that is to be removed or separated to form the pocket. The laser beam disrupts the corneal tissue, forming a pocket with the desired shape and dimensions. As shown in
As shown in
In alternative embodiments, a secondary channel, in addition to channel 428, can also be created that creates a secondary access location to the pocket. The secondary channel accesses the pocket from a direction other than channel 428. The secondary channel can be created in the same way as channel 428. The secondary channel can be substantially on the opposite side of the cornea (i.e., substantially 180 degrees away from) relative to channel 428. The secondary channel allows a path for a tool to be advanced into the pocket and assist in the removal of the implant from the holding space. Using a tool in this manner is described in more detail above.
This application is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/411,425, filed Mar. 2, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,540,727, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/692,835, filed Mar. 28, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,162,953. This application also claims priority to U.S. Prov. App. No. 61/535,744, filed Sep. 16, 2011. This application incorporates by reference herein all of the aforementioned applications. This application is related to and incorporates by reference herein the disclosure of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/549,007, filed Jul. 13, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2714721 | Stone, Jr. | Aug 1955 | A |
3091328 | Leonardos | May 1963 | A |
3168100 | Rich | Feb 1965 | A |
3343657 | Speshyock | Sep 1967 | A |
3379200 | Pennell | Apr 1968 | A |
3482906 | Volk | Dec 1969 | A |
3743337 | Crary | Jul 1973 | A |
3770113 | Thomas | Nov 1973 | A |
3879076 | Barnett | Apr 1975 | A |
3950315 | Cleaver | Apr 1976 | A |
3996627 | Deeg et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4030480 | Meyer | Jun 1977 | A |
4037604 | Newkirk | Jul 1977 | A |
4039827 | Zdrok et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4065816 | Sawyer | Jan 1978 | A |
4071272 | Drdlik | Jan 1978 | A |
4093291 | Schurgin | Jun 1978 | A |
4136406 | Norris | Jan 1979 | A |
4157718 | Baehr | Jun 1979 | A |
4184491 | McGannon | Jan 1980 | A |
4194814 | Fischer et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4238524 | LaLiberte et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4257521 | Poler | Mar 1981 | A |
4268133 | Fischer et al. | May 1981 | A |
4326306 | Poler | Apr 1982 | A |
4357940 | Muller | Nov 1982 | A |
4392569 | Shoup | Jul 1983 | A |
4418991 | Breger | Dec 1983 | A |
4423809 | Mazzocco | Jan 1984 | A |
4428746 | Mendez | Jan 1984 | A |
4452235 | Reynolds | Jun 1984 | A |
4466705 | Michelson | Aug 1984 | A |
4490860 | Rainin | Jan 1985 | A |
4504982 | Burk | Mar 1985 | A |
4521210 | Wong | Jun 1985 | A |
4525044 | Bauman | Jun 1985 | A |
4545478 | Waldman | Oct 1985 | A |
4554115 | Neefe | Nov 1985 | A |
4554918 | White | Nov 1985 | A |
4565198 | Koeniger | Jan 1986 | A |
4573998 | Mazzocco | Mar 1986 | A |
4580882 | Nuchman et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4586929 | Binder | May 1986 | A |
4604087 | Joseph | Aug 1986 | A |
4607617 | Choyce | Aug 1986 | A |
4616910 | Klein | Oct 1986 | A |
4618227 | Bayshore | Oct 1986 | A |
4619256 | Horn | Oct 1986 | A |
4624664 | Peluso et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4624669 | Grendahl | Nov 1986 | A |
4640595 | Volk | Feb 1987 | A |
4646720 | Peyman et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655774 | Choyce | Apr 1987 | A |
4662370 | Hoffmann et al. | May 1987 | A |
4663358 | Hyon et al. | May 1987 | A |
4671276 | Reynolds | Jun 1987 | A |
4676792 | Praeger | Jun 1987 | A |
4697697 | Graham et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702244 | Mazzocco | Oct 1987 | A |
4709697 | Muller | Dec 1987 | A |
4721124 | Tuerkheimer et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4726367 | Shoemaker | Feb 1988 | A |
4750901 | Molteno | Jun 1988 | A |
4762496 | Maloney et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4766895 | Reynolds | Aug 1988 | A |
4769033 | Nordan | Sep 1988 | A |
4772283 | White | Sep 1988 | A |
4778462 | Grendahl | Oct 1988 | A |
4798609 | Grendahl | Jan 1989 | A |
4806382 | Goldberg et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4836201 | Patton et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4840175 | Peyman | Jun 1989 | A |
4842599 | Bronstein | Jun 1989 | A |
4844242 | Chen et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4851003 | Lindstrom | Jul 1989 | A |
4860885 | Kaufman et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4865552 | Maloney et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4886488 | White | Dec 1989 | A |
4888016 | Langerman | Dec 1989 | A |
4897981 | Beck | Feb 1990 | A |
4911715 | Kelman | Mar 1990 | A |
4919130 | Stoy et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4923467 | Thompson | May 1990 | A |
4934363 | Smith et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4936825 | Ungerleider | Jun 1990 | A |
4946436 | Smith | Aug 1990 | A |
4955903 | Sulc et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4968296 | Ritch et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4971732 | Wichterle | Nov 1990 | A |
4976719 | Siepser | Dec 1990 | A |
5019084 | Aysta et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019098 | Mercier | May 1991 | A |
5022414 | Muller | Jun 1991 | A |
5030230 | White | Jul 1991 | A |
5041081 | Odrich | Aug 1991 | A |
5063942 | Kilmer et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5071276 | Nielsen et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5073163 | Lippman | Dec 1991 | A |
5092837 | Ritch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5098444 | Feaster | Mar 1992 | A |
5108428 | Capecchi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5112350 | Civerchia et al. | May 1992 | A |
5123905 | Kelman | Jun 1992 | A |
5123912 | Kaplan et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123921 | Werblin et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5139518 | White | Aug 1992 | A |
5163934 | Munnerlyn | Nov 1992 | A |
5171213 | Price, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5173723 | Volk | Dec 1992 | A |
5178604 | Baerveldt et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5180362 | Worst et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5181053 | Brown | Jan 1993 | A |
5188125 | Kilmer et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5190552 | Kelman | Mar 1993 | A |
5192317 | Kalb | Mar 1993 | A |
5196026 | Barrett et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5211660 | Grasso | May 1993 | A |
5225858 | Portney | Jul 1993 | A |
5229797 | Futhey et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5244799 | Anderson | Sep 1993 | A |
5258042 | Mehta | Nov 1993 | A |
5270744 | Portney | Dec 1993 | A |
5273750 | Homiger et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282851 | Jacob-LaBarre | Feb 1994 | A |
5300020 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5300116 | Chirila et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5312413 | Eaton et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318044 | Kilmer et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5318046 | Rozakis | Jun 1994 | A |
5318047 | Davenport et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5336261 | Barrett et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5338291 | Speckman et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344448 | Schneider et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5346464 | Camras | Sep 1994 | A |
5370607 | Memmen | Dec 1994 | A |
5372577 | Ungerleider | Dec 1994 | A |
5385582 | Ommaya | Jan 1995 | A |
5391201 | Barrett et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5397300 | Baerveldt et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5405384 | Silvestrini | Apr 1995 | A |
5428412 | Stoyan | Jun 1995 | A |
5433701 | Rubinstein | Jul 1995 | A |
5454796 | Krupin | Oct 1995 | A |
5458819 | Chirila et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467149 | Morrison et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5474562 | Orchowski et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5476445 | Baerveldt et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5487377 | Smith et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489301 | Barber | Feb 1996 | A |
5493350 | Seidner | Feb 1996 | A |
5502518 | Lieberman | Mar 1996 | A |
5512220 | Roffman et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5520631 | Nordquist et al. | May 1996 | A |
5521656 | Portney | May 1996 | A |
5530491 | Baude et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533997 | Ruiz | Jul 1996 | A |
5570142 | Lieberman | Oct 1996 | A |
5591185 | Kilmer et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598234 | Blum et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5616148 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620450 | Eagles et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628794 | Lindstrom | May 1997 | A |
5630810 | Machat | May 1997 | A |
5634943 | Villain et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643276 | Zaleski | Jul 1997 | A |
5657108 | Portney | Aug 1997 | A |
5682223 | Menezes et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684560 | Roffman et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5715031 | Roffman et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716633 | Civerchia | Feb 1998 | A |
5722948 | Gross | Mar 1998 | A |
5722971 | Peyman | Mar 1998 | A |
5728155 | Anello et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732990 | Yavitz et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5752928 | de Roulhac et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755785 | Rowsey et al. | May 1998 | A |
5766181 | Chambers et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772667 | Blake | Jun 1998 | A |
5779711 | Kritzinger et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785674 | Mateen | Jul 1998 | A |
5800442 | Wolf et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800529 | Brauker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805260 | Roffman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810833 | Brady et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817115 | Nigam | Oct 1998 | A |
5824086 | Silvestrini | Oct 1998 | A |
5847802 | Menezes et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855604 | Lee | Jan 1999 | A |
5860984 | Chambers et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5872613 | Blum et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873889 | Chin | Feb 1999 | A |
5876439 | Lee | Mar 1999 | A |
5888243 | Silverstrini | Mar 1999 | A |
5893719 | Radow | Apr 1999 | A |
5913898 | Feingold | Jun 1999 | A |
5919185 | Peyman | Jul 1999 | A |
5928245 | Wolf et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929968 | Cotie et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929969 | Roffman | Jul 1999 | A |
5935140 | Buratto | Aug 1999 | A |
5941583 | Raimondi | Aug 1999 | A |
5944752 | Silvestrini | Aug 1999 | A |
5945498 | Hopken et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964748 | Peyman | Oct 1999 | A |
5964776 | Peyman | Oct 1999 | A |
5968065 | Chin | Oct 1999 | A |
5976150 | Copeland | Nov 1999 | A |
5976168 | Chin | Nov 1999 | A |
5980549 | Chin | Nov 1999 | A |
6007510 | Nigam | Dec 1999 | A |
6010510 | Brown et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6024448 | Wu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033395 | Peyman | Mar 2000 | A |
6036714 | Chin | Mar 2000 | A |
6050999 | Paraschac et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055990 | Thompson | May 2000 | A |
6066170 | Lee | May 2000 | A |
6068642 | Johnson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079826 | Appleton et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083231 | Van Noy et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6086202 | Chateau et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090141 | Lindstrom | Jul 2000 | A |
6102946 | Nigam | Aug 2000 | A |
6110166 | Juhasz et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6120148 | Fiala et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125294 | Scholl et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129733 | Brady et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139560 | Kremer | Oct 2000 | A |
6142969 | Nigam | Nov 2000 | A |
6143001 | Brown et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159241 | Lee et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171324 | Cote et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175754 | Scholl et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
RE37071 | Gabrielian et al. | Feb 2001 | E |
6183513 | Guenthner et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197019 | Peyman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197057 | Peyman et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6197058 | Portney | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203538 | Peyman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203549 | Waldock | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6203557 | Chin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206919 | Lee | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210005 | Portney | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214015 | Reich et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214044 | Silverstrini | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217571 | Peyman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221067 | Peyman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228113 | Kaufman | May 2001 | B1 |
6228114 | Lee | May 2001 | B1 |
6248111 | Glick et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250757 | Roffman et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251114 | Farmer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264648 | Peyman | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264670 | Chin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264692 | Woffinden et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267768 | Deacon et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271281 | Liao et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6277137 | Chin | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280449 | Blake | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280470 | Peyman | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283595 | Breger | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302877 | Ruiz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6325509 | Hodur et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6325792 | Swinger et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350272 | Kawesch | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361560 | Nigam | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364483 | Grossinger et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371960 | Heyman et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6391230 | Sarbadhikari | May 2002 | B1 |
6398277 | McDonald | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6398789 | Capetan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6428572 | Nagai | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6435681 | Portney | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6436092 | Peyman | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6447519 | Brady et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6447520 | Ott et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458141 | Peyman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6461384 | Hoffmann et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471708 | Green | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6474814 | Griffin | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6506200 | Chin | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6511178 | Roffman et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527389 | Portney | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537283 | Van Noy | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6543610 | Nigam | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544286 | Perez | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6551307 | Peyman | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554424 | Miller et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6554425 | Roffman et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6557998 | Portney | May 2003 | B2 |
6581993 | Nigam | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6582076 | Roffman et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589057 | Keenan et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589203 | Mitrev | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6589280 | Koziol | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592591 | Polla et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6596000 | Chan et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6605093 | Blake | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607537 | Binder | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6607556 | Nigam | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623522 | Nigam | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626941 | Nigam | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629979 | Feingold et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6632244 | Nigam | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641577 | Bille | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645246 | Weinschenk, III et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648877 | Juhasz et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657029 | Vanderbilt | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6666887 | Callahan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673112 | Nigam | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6702807 | Peyman | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6709103 | Roffman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6712848 | Wolf et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6723104 | Ott | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6733507 | McNicholas et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6733526 | Paul et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6808262 | Chapoy et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6824178 | Nigam | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6849090 | Nigam | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6855163 | Peyman | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6875232 | Nigam | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879402 | Küchel | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6881197 | Nigam | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6893461 | Nigam | May 2005 | B2 |
6949093 | Peyman | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6955432 | Graham | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7128351 | Nigam | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7585075 | Marmo | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7699837 | Cox et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7776086 | Miller | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7976577 | Silvestrini | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7992906 | Nigam | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8057541 | Dishler et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8162953 | Dishler et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8685292 | Mandler et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20010027314 | Peyman | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010051826 | Bogaert et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020010510 | Silvestrini | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020055753 | Silvestrini | May 2002 | A1 |
20020101563 | Miyamura et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020103538 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138069 | Peyman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030014042 | Juhasz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033010 | Hicks et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030069637 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078487 | Jeffries et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030176855 | Gross et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208190 | Roberts et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030220653 | Perez | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229303 | Haffner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040019379 | Glick et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034413 | Christensen | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054408 | Glick et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073303 | Schanzlin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050080484 | Marmo et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050080485 | Nigam | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050113844 | Nigam | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119738 | Nigam | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050143717 | Peyman | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050178394 | Slade | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182350 | Nigam | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050182488 | Peyman | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203494 | Holliday | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222679 | Peyman | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246016 | Miller et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060004381 | Feingold et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060020267 | Marmo | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060105309 | Stoll et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060116762 | Hong et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060134170 | Griffith et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142780 | Pynson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142781 | Pynson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173539 | Shiuey | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060235430 | Le et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070027538 | Aharoni et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070106318 | McDonald | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106376 | Roberts et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129797 | Lang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070182920 | Back et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070244559 | Shiuey | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070255401 | Lang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070280994 | Cunanan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080243138 | Dishler | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080262610 | Lang et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269771 | Fulcher | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275433 | Russmann et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281304 | Campbell | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090079940 | Dai et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090198325 | Holliday et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090216217 | Odrich et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090326650 | Zickler et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100210996 | Peyman | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241060 | Roizman et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100331831 | Bischoff et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029073 | Liang | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110149241 | Dai | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110208300 | de Juan et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110218623 | Dishler et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110256806 | Monnoyeur | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110290681 | Nigam | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319876 | Feingold | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120046680 | Dishler et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120165823 | Dishler et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120203238 | Nigam | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120231416 | Drapeau et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238806 | Mangiardi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245592 | Berner et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130060255 | Feingold et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130123916 | Nigam et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130211523 | Southard et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130253529 | Walter et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130281993 | Dishler et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130317605 | Ide et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130324983 | Liang | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130331935 | Krause et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140257477 | Plambeck et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140288540 | Bischoff et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150080865 | Holliday et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150297340 | Esguerra et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160184085 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2011069907 | Jun 2011 | CH |
3208729 | Sep 1983 | DE |
0308077 | Mar 1989 | EP |
0420549 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0729323 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0668061 | Sep 2000 | EP |
S5973622 | Apr 1984 | JP |
01-195853 | Aug 1989 | JP |
02-211119 | Aug 1990 | JP |
5502811 | May 1993 | JP |
H06510687 | Dec 1994 | JP |
08-501009 | Feb 1996 | JP |
9-504706 | May 1997 | JP |
2000506056 | May 2000 | JP |
2002537895 | Nov 2002 | JP |
03-508135 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2007500070 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2001-0013218 | Feb 2001 | KR |
WO9208423 | May 1992 | WO |
WO9305731 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9626690 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9808549 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO 9848715 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9917691 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9921513 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 9930645 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 0038594 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 03041616 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 03061518 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03101341 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2005020792 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005107648 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006029316 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006060363 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007101016 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO 2007132332 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2010084595 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Dishler et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/854,588 entitled “Small Diameter Corneal Inlays,” filed Apr. 1, 2013. |
Nigam et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/160,438 entitled “Coreal Implant Applicators,” filed Jan. 21, 2014. |
Sharma et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/211,714 entitled “Pre-treatment haze reduction for corneal inlays,”, filed Mar. 14, 2014. |
Long et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/217,056 entitled “Anterior corneal shapes and methods of providing the shapes,”, filed Mar. 17, 2014. |
Patel et al.; Refractive index of human corneal epithelium and stroma; J. Refract. Surg.; 11(2); Abstract; Mar. 1995 (pubmed Abstract only). |
Esguerra et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/463,355 entitled “Corneal implant storage, packaging, and delivery devices,”, filed Aug. 19, 2014. |
Alio, J. J., et al., “Intracorneal Inlay Complicated by Intrastomal Epithelial Opacification,” Arch Ophthalmol, Oct. 2004; vol. 122; 6 pages. |
Cheng, et al.; “Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics”; Journal of Vision; Apr. 23, 2004; vol. 4(4); pp. 310-321. |
Churms, P.W., “The Theory and Computation of Optical Modifications to the Cornea in Refractive Keratoplasty,” American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 56:2, pp. 67-74, Feb. 1979. |
Huang et al.; Mathematical Model of Corneal Surface Smoothing After Laser Refractive Surgery; American Journal of Ophthalmology; Mar. 2003; pp. 267-278. |
Lang, A.J. et al., “First order design of intracorneal inlays: dependence on keratometric flap and corneal properties,” ARVO Abstracts 2006, poster No. 3591, May 3, 2006. |
Liou, H. L. et al., “Anatomically accurate, finite model eye for optical modeling”, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 14, No. 8, Aug. 1997. |
Marsack,et al.; “Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance”; Journal of Vision; Apr. 23, 2004; vol. 4(4); pp. 322-328. |
Navarro et al.; Accommodation-dependent model of the human eye with aspherics; J. Opt. Soc Am. A; vol. 2; No. 8; Aug. 1985; pp. 1273-1281. |
Watsky, M.A. et al., “Predicting Refractive Alterations with Hydrogel Keratophakia,” Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 26, pp. 240-243, Feb. 1985. |
Schneider et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/549,007 entitled “Corneal Implant Retaining Devices and Methods of Use,”, filed Jul. 13, 2012. |
Schneider et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 13/619,955 entitled “Corneal Implant Inserters and Methods of Use,”, filed Sep. 14, 2012. |
Collins et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/575,833 entitled “Integrated part fixturing for lathing processes,”, filed Dec. 18, 2014. |
Sharma; U.S. Appl. No. 14/427,510 entitled “Corneal implant edges and methods of use,”, filed Mar. 11, 2015. |
Holliday et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 14/656,621 entitled “Methods of correcting vision,”, filed Mar. 12, 2015. |
Dymax; UV curable optical assembly; 2 pages; retrieved Mar. 4, 2015 from the internet (http:www.dymax.com/index.php/adhesives/optical). |
Jankov et al.; Laser intrastromal keratoplasty—case report; J. Refract.Surg.; 20(1); pp. 79-84; Jan.-Feb. 2004. |
Winn et al.; Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects; Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science; 35(3); pp. 1132-1137; Mar. 1994. |
Plambeck et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/163,610 entitled “Corneal implant storage and delivery devices,”, filed May 24, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130253527 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61535744 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11692835 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 13411425 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13411425 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 13619955 | US |