The present invention is related to a kinetic spray process and, more particularly, to a method for healing defective kinetically sprayed surfaces.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,139,913, “Kinetic Spray Coating Method and Apparatus,” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,283,386 “Kinetic Spray Coating Apparatus” are incorporated by reference herein.
A new technique for producing coatings on a wide variety of substrate surfaces by kinetic spray, or cold gas dynamic spray, was recently reported in articles by T. H. Van Steenkiste et al., entitled “Kinetic Spray Coatings,” published in Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 111, pages 62-71, Jan. 10, 1999 and “Aluminum coatings via kinetic spray with relatively large powder particles” published in Surface and Coatings Technology 154, pages 237-252, 2002. The articles discuss producing continuous layer coatings having low porosity, high adhesion, low oxide content and low thermal stress. The articles describe coatings being produced by entraining metal powders in an accelerated air stream, through a converging-diverging de Laval type nozzle and projecting them against a target substrate. The particles are accelerated in the high velocity air stream by the drag effect. The air used can be any of a variety of gases including air or helium. It was found that the particles that formed the coating did not melt or thermally soften prior to impingement onto the substrate. It is theorized that the particles adhere to the substrate when their kinetic energy is converted to a sufficient level of thermal and mechanical deformation. Thus, it is believed that the particle velocity must be high enough to exceed the yield stress of the particle to permit it to adhere when it strikes the substrate. It was found that the deposition efficiency of a given particle mixture was increased as the inlet air temperature was increased. Increasing the inlet air temperature decreases its density and increases its velocity. The velocity of the main gas varies approximately as the square root of the inlet air temperature. The actual mechanism of bonding of the particles to the substrate surface is not fully known at this time. It is believed that the particles must exceed a critical velocity prior to their being able to bond to the substrate. The critical velocity is dependent on the material of the particle and to a lesser degree on the material of the substrate. It is believed that the initial particles to adhere to a substrate have broken the oxide shell on the substrate material permitting subsequent metal to metal bond formation between plastically deformed particles and the substrate. Once an initial layer of particles has been formed on a substrate subsequent particles not only fill the voids between previous particles bound to the substrate but also engage in particle to particle bonds. The particles also break any oxide shells on previously bonded particles. The bonding process is not due to melting of the particles in the air stream because while the temperature of the air stream may be above the melting point of the particles, due to the short exposure time the particles are never heated to a temperature above their melt temperature. This feature is considered critical because the kinetic spray process allows one to deposit particles onto a surface without a phase transition.
This work improved upon earlier work by Alkimov et al. as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,414, issued Apr. 12, 1994. Alkimov et al. disclosed producing dense continuous layer coatings with powder particles having a particle size of from 1 to 50 microns using a supersonic spray.
The Van Steenkiste articles reported on work conducted by the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences (NCMS) and by the Delphi Research Labs to improve on the earlier Alkimov process and apparatus. Van Steenkiste et al. demonstrated that Alkimov's apparatus and process could be modified to produce kinetic spray coatings using particle sizes of greater than 50 microns.
The modified process and apparatus for producing such larger particle size kinetic spray continuous layer coatings are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913, and 6,283,386. The process and apparatus described provide for heating a high pressure air flow and combining this with a flow of particles. The heated air and particles are directed through a de Laval-type nozzle to produce a particle exit velocity of between about 300 m/s (meters per second) to about 1000 m/s. The thus accelerated particles are directed toward and impact upon a target substrate with sufficient kinetic energy to bond the particles to the surface of the substrate. The temperatures and pressures used are sufficiently lower than that necessary to cause particle melting or thermal softening of the selected particle. Therefore, as discussed above, no phase transition occurs in the particles prior to bonding. It has been found that each type of particle material has a threshold critical velocity that must be exceeded before the material begins to adhere to the substrate by the kinetic spray process.
The kinetic spray process has been used to create very thick layers of several centimeters in thickness or more. In addition, the process has been used to create tooling because of its versatility and ability to rapidly build thick layers. One difficulty that can occur in layers of any thickness, but that can be quite noticeable in layers that are 5 millimeters or thicker, is the formation of defects. These defects typically have the shape of right conical cones. Once they begin to develop they are stable and can not be corrected by the kinetic spray process. Continued kinetic spraying leads to an enlarging of the defect. The defects are normal to the surface being sprayed and they have a near constant slant height S described by the equation:
S=(R2+H2)0.5
Wherein R is the radius of the cone defect and H is the height of the cone. In the past, these defects required discarding of the kinetically sprayed surface because they could not be repaired. This leads to costly operations and time delays, particularly if the defect is not observed immediately. It would be advantageous to develop a method for repairing these defective surfaces that once applied would allow for continued kinetic spraying of the repaired surface.
In one embodiment, the present invention is a method for repairing a defect in a kinetically sprayed surface comprising the steps of providing a kinetically sprayed surface having a defect in the surface, applying a repair coating to the defect by thermally spraying a molten material on the defect, thereby filling the defect and repairing the defect.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention comprises a method for repairing a defective kinetically sprayed surface. The method combines the use of a thermal spray process, which is known in the art, with the relatively new technology of the kinetic spray process. The kinetic spray process used is generally described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913, 6,283,386 and the two articles by Van Steenkiste, et al. entitled “Kinetic Spray Coatings”, published in Surface and Coatings Technology, Volume III, pages 62-72, Jan. 10, 1999 and “Aluminum coatings via kinetic spray with relatively large powder particles”, published in Surface and Coatings Technology 154, pages 237-252, 2002, all of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Referring first to
The spray system 10 further includes an air compressor 24 capable of supplying air pressure up to 3.4 MPa (500 psi) to a high pressure air ballast tank 26. The air ballast tank 26 is connected through a line 28 to both a high pressure powder feeder 30 and a separate air heater 32. The air heater 32 supplies high pressure heated air, the main gas described below, to a kinetic spray nozzle 34. The temperature of the main gas varies from 100 to 3000° C., depending on the powder or powders being sprayed. The pressure of the main gas and the powder feeder varies from 200 to 500 psi. The powder feeder 30 mixes particles of a powder or a powder mixture of particles with unheated high-pressure air and supplies the mixture to a supplemental inlet line 48 of the nozzle 34. The particles are described below and may comprise a metal, an alloy, a ceramic, or mixtures thereof. As known to those of ordinary skill in the art an alloy is defined as a solid or liquid mixture of two or more metals, or of one or more metals with certain nonmetallic elements, as in carbon containing steel. A computer control 35 operates to control both the pressure of air supplied to the air heater 32 and the temperature of the heated main gas exiting the air heater 32. As would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, the system 10 can include multiple powder feeders 30, all of which are connected to supplemental feedline 48. For clarity only one powder feeder 30 is shown in
The mixture of unheated high pressure air and coating powder is fed through the supplemental inlet line 48 to a powder injector tube 50 comprising a straight pipe having a predetermined inner diameter. The predetermined diameter can range from 0.40 to 3.00 millimeters. Preferably it ranges from 0.40 to 0.90 millimeters in diameter. The tube 50 has a central axis 52 which is preferentially the same as the axis of the premix chamber 38. The tube 50 extends through the premix chamber 38 and the flow straightener 40 into the mixing chamber 42.
Mixing chamber 42 is in communication with the de Laval type nozzle 54. The nozzle 54 has an entrance cone 56 that decreases in diameter to a throat 58. Downstream of the throat is an exit end 60. The largest diameter of the entrance cone 56 may range from 10 to 6 millimeters, with 7.5 millimeters being preferred. The entrance cone 56 narrows to the throat 58. The throat 58 may have a diameter of from 3.5 to 1.5 millimeters, with from 3 to 2 millimeters being preferred. The portion of the nozzle 54 from downstream of the throat 58 to the exit end 60 may have a variety of shapes, but in a preferred embodiment it has a rectangular cross-sectional shape. At the exit end 60 the nozzle 54 preferably has a rectangular shape with a long dimension of from 8 to 14 millimeters by a short dimension of from 2 to 6 millimeters. The distance from the throat 58 to the exit end 60 may vary from 60 to 400 millimeters.
As disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913 and 6,283,386 the powder injector tube 50 supplies a particle powder mixture to the system 10 under a pressure in excess of the pressure of the heated main gas from the passage 36. The nozzle 54 produces an exit velocity of the entrained particles of from 300 meters per second to as high as 1200 meters per second. The entrained particles gain kinetic and thermal energy during their flow through this nozzle. It will be recognized by those of skill in the art that the temperature of the particles in the gas stream will vary depending on the particle size and the main gas temperature. The main gas temperature is defined as the temperature of heated high-pressure gas at the inlet to the nozzle 54. These temperatures and the exposure time of the particles are kept low enough that the particles are always at a temperature below their melting temperature so even upon impact, there is no change in the solid phase of the original particles due to transfer of kinetic and thermal energy, and therefore no change in their original physical properties. The particles exiting the nozzle 54 are directed toward a surface of a substrate to coat it.
Upon striking a substrate opposite the nozzle 54 the particles flatten into a nub-like structure with an aspect ratio of generally about 5 to 1. When the substrate is a metal and the particles include a metal, all the particles striking the substrate surface fracture the oxidized surface layer and the metal particles subsequently form a direct metal-to-metal bond between the metal particle and the metal substrate. Upon impact the kinetic sprayed particles transfer substantially all of their kinetic and thermal energy to the substrate surface and stick if their yield stress has been exceeded. As discussed above, for a given particle to adhere to a substrate it is necessary that it reach or exceed its critical velocity which is defined as the velocity where at it will adhere to a substrate when it strikes the substrate after exiting the nozzle 54. This critical velocity is dependent on the material composition of the particle. In general, harder materials must achieve a higher critical velocity before they adhere to a given substrate. It is not known at this time exactly what is the nature of the particle to substrate bond; however, it is believed that a portion of the bond is due to the particles plastically deforming upon striking the substrate.
In
In
In
In
In
The repair can be made using any thermal spray process. For example, a plasma gas thermal spray process, a High Velocity Oxy-Fuel combustion (HVOF) thermal spray process, a wire arc thermal spray, an air plasma thermal spray, a vacuum plasma, a flame spray, or radio frequency plasma thermal spray. These general processes are known in the art, but have not been utilized to repair kinetically sprayed surfaces. Any of these processes are suitable for applying a thermal sprayed layer to correct the defect.
While the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described so as to enable one skilled in the art to practice the present invention, it is to be understood that variations and modifications may be employed without departing from the concept and intent of the present invention as defined in the following claims. The preceding description is intended to be exemplary and should not be used to limit the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention should be determined only by reference to the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2861900 | Smith et al. | Nov 1958 | A |
3100724 | Rocheville | Aug 1963 | A |
3876456 | Ford et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3993411 | Babcock et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
3996398 | Manfredi | Dec 1976 | A |
4263335 | Wagner et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4416421 | Browning et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4606495 | Stewart, Jr. et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4891275 | Knoll | Jan 1990 | A |
4939022 | Palanisamy | Jul 1990 | A |
5187021 | Vydra et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5217746 | Lenling et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5271965 | Browning | Dec 1993 | A |
5302414 | Alknimor et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5308463 | Hoffmann et al. | May 1994 | A |
5328751 | Komorita et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5330798 | Browning | Jul 1994 | A |
5340015 | Hira et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5362523 | Gorynin et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5395679 | Myers et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5424101 | Atkins et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5464146 | Zalvzec et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5465627 | Garshelis | Nov 1995 | A |
5476725 | Papich et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5493921 | Alasafi | Feb 1996 | A |
5520059 | Garshelis | May 1996 | A |
5525570 | Chakraborty et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5527627 | Lautzenhiser et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5585574 | Sugihara et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593740 | Strumbon et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5648123 | Kuhn et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5683615 | Munoz | Nov 1997 | A |
5706572 | Garshelis | Jan 1998 | A |
5708216 | Garshelis | Jan 1998 | A |
5725023 | Padula | Mar 1998 | A |
5795626 | Grabel et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5854966 | Kampe et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5875830 | Singer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887335 | Garshelis | Mar 1999 | A |
5889215 | Kilmartin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5894054 | Paruchuri et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5907105 | Pinkerton | May 1999 | A |
5907761 | Tohma et al. | May 1999 | A |
5952056 | Jordan et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965193 | Ning et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5989310 | Chu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993565 | Pinkerton | Nov 1999 | A |
6033622 | Maruyama | Mar 2000 | A |
6047605 | Garshelis | Apr 2000 | A |
6051045 | Narula et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6051277 | Claussen et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6074737 | Jordan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6098741 | Gluf | Aug 2000 | A |
6119667 | Boyer et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6129948 | Plummet et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6139913 | Van Steenkiste et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145387 | Garshelis | Nov 2000 | A |
6149736 | Sugihara | Nov 2000 | A |
6159430 | Foster | Dec 2000 | A |
6189663 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6260423 | Garshelis | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261703 | Sasaki et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283386 | Van Steenkiste et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6283859 | Carlson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289748 | Lin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6338827 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344237 | Kilmer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6374664 | Bauer | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402050 | Kashirin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422360 | Oliver et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424896 | Lin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442039 | Schreiber | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446857 | Kent et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6465039 | Pinkerton et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485852 | Miller et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488115 | Ozsoylu | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6490934 | Garshelis | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6511135 | Ballinger et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6537507 | Nelson et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6551734 | Simpkins et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553847 | Garshelis | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6615488 | Anders | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6623704 | Roth | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623796 | VanSteenkiste et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6743468 | Fuller et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
20020071906 | Rusch | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020073982 | Shaikh et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020102360 | Subramanian et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020110682 | Brogan | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112549 | Cheshmehdoost et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020182311 | Leonardi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030039856 | Gillispie et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030190414 | VanSteenkiste | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030219542 | Ewasyshyn et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040065432 | Smith et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
42 36 911 | Dec 1993 | DE |
199 59 515 | Jun 2001 | DE |
100 37 212 | Jan 2002 | DE |
101 26 100 | Dec 2002 | DE |
1 160 348 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1245854 | Feb 2002 | EP |
55031161 | Mar 1980 | JP |
61249541 | Nov 1986 | JP |
04180770 | Jun 1992 | JP |
04243524 | Aug 1992 | JP |
9822639 | May 1998 | WO |
0252064 | Jan 2002 | WO |
03009934 | Feb 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050074560 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |