The Internet provides access to a wide variety of resources, such as image files, audio files, video files, and web pages. A search system can identify resources in response to queries submitted by users and provide information about the resources in a manner that is useful to the users. The users can navigate through, e.g., click on, search results to acquire information of interest.
This specification relates to speech recognition, e.g., voice-to-text, in search systems.
Implementations of the present disclosure are generally directed to correcting speech recognition using selective re-speak. More particularly, implementations of the present disclosure are directed to correcting a portion of a textual search query based on re-speaking (by a user) the portion of the textual search query. In some examples, the portion of the textual search query is corrected to provide a corrected textual search query.
In general, innovative aspects of the subject matter described in this specification can be embodied in methods that include actions of providing first text for display on a computing device of a user, the first text being provided from a first speech recognition engine based on first speech received from the computing device, and being displayed as a search query, receiving a speech correction indication from the computing device, the speech correction indication indicating a portion of the first text that is to be corrected, receiving second speech from the computing device, receiving second text from a second speech recognition engine based on the second speech, the second speech recognition engine being different from the first speech recognition engine, replacing the portion of the first text with the second text to provide a combined text, and providing the combined text for display on the computing device as a revised search query. Other implementations of this aspect include corresponding systems, apparatus, and computer programs, configured to perform the actions of the methods, encoded on computer storage devices.
These and other implementations can each optionally include one or more of the following features: the portion includes an entirety of the first text; the portion comprises less than an entirety of the first text; the second speech recognition engine includes the first speech recognition engine and at least one additional function; the at least one additional function includes selecting a potential text as the second text based on one or more entities associated with the first text; actions further include: receiving first search results based on the first text, and providing the first search results for display on the computing device; actions further include: receiving second search results based on the second text, and providing the second search results for display on the computing device in place of the first search results; and the speech correction indication includes user selection of at least one word of a plurality of words of the first text.
Particular implementations of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented so as to realize one or more of the following advantages. In some examples, correction of a portion of the initial query is faster and more resource efficient. For example, from the user perspective, it is faster/easier to re-speak the portion instead of the entirety of the initial query. From a resource perspective, less bandwidth is required and less computer processing power and/or memory are required to perform speech recognition on the portion, as opposed to the entirety of the initial query. In some examples, user interaction with the computing device is simplified, e.g., the user spelling out a single word instead of an entire query. In some examples, a more complex speech recognition can be used to more accurately convert the second speech to text without consuming increased resources, e.g., because the second speech is shorter than the entirety of the initial query.
The details of one or more implementations of the subject matter described in this specification are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Implementations of the present disclosure are generally directed to correcting speech recognition using selective re-speak. More particularly, implementations of the present disclosure are directed to correcting a portion of a search query based on a user re-speaking the portion. In some implementations, first text is provided for display to a user, the first text being provided from a first speech recognition engine based on first speech of the user received from the computing device. In some examples, the first text is a search query that is submitted to a search system. In some implementations, the user can indicate a portion of the first text that is to be corrected, and can provide second speech, which is processed using a second speech recognition engine to provide second text. In some implementations, the portion of the first text is replaced with the second text to provide a combined text. In some examples, the combined text is a revised search query that is submitted to the search system.
With continued reference to
In some examples, a web site 104 is provided as one or more resources 105 associated with a domain name and hosted by one or more servers. An example web site is a collection of web pages formatted in an appropriate machine-readable language, e.g., hypertext markup language (HTML), that can contain text, images, multimedia content, and programming elements, e.g., scripts. Each web site 104 is maintained by a publisher, e.g., an entity that manages and/or owns the web site.
In some examples, a resource 105 is data provided over the network 102 and that is associated with a resource address, e.g., a uniform resource locator (URL). In some examples, resources 105 that can be provided by a web site 104 include web pages, word processing documents, and portable document format (PDF) documents, images, video, and feed sources, among other appropriate digital content. The resources 105 can include content, e.g., words, phrases, images and sounds and may include embedded information, e.g., meta information and hyperlinks, and/or embedded instructions, e.g., scripts.
In some examples, a user device 106 is an electronic device that is capable of requesting and receiving resources 105 over the network 102. Example user devices 106 include personal computers, laptop computers, and mobile computing devices, e.g., smartphones and/or tablet computing devices, that can send and receive data over the network 102. As used throughout this document, the term mobile computing device (“mobile device”) refers to a user device that is configured to communicate over a mobile communications network. A smartphone, e.g., a phone that is enabled to communicate over the Internet, is an example of a mobile device. A user device 106 can execute a user application, e.g., a web browser, to facilitate the sending and receiving of data over the network 102.
In some examples, to facilitate searching of resources 105, the search system 120 identifies the resources 105 by crawling and indexing the resources 105 provided on web sites 104. Data about the resources 105 can be indexed based on the resource to which the data corresponds. The indexed and, optionally, cached copies of the resources 105 are stored in a search index 122.
The user devices 106 submit search queries 109 to the search system 120. In some examples, a user device 106 can include one or more input modalities. Example modalities can include a keyboard, a touchscreen and/or a microphone. For example, a user can use a keyboard and/or touchscreen to type in a search query. As another example, a user can speak a search query, the user speech being captured through a microphone, and being processed through speech recognition to provide the search query.
In response to receiving a search query 109, the search system 120 accesses the search index 122 to identify resources 105 that are relevant to, e.g., have at least a minimum specified relevance score for, the search query 109. The search system 120 identifies the resources 105, generates a search results display 111 that includes search results 112 identifying resources 105, and returns the search results display 111 to the user devices 106. In an example context, a search results display can include one or more web pages, e.g., one or more search results pages. In some examples, a web page can be provided based on a web document that can be written in any appropriate machine-readable language. It is contemplated, however, that implementations of the present disclosure can include other appropriate display types. For example, the search results can be provided in a display generated by an application that is executed on a computing device, and/or a display generated by an operating system, e.g., mobile operating system. In some examples, search results can be provided based on any appropriate form, e.g., Javascript-html, plaintext.
A search result 112 is data generated by the search system 120 that identifies a resource 105 that is responsive to a particular search query, and includes a link to the resource 105. An example search result 112 can include a web page title, a snippet of text or a portion of an image extracted from the web page, and the URL of the web page. In some examples, data provided in the search results 112 can be retrieved from a resource data store. For example, the search system 120 can provide the search results display 111, which displays the search results 112. In some examples, the search results display 111 can be populated with information, e.g., a web page title, a snippet of text or a portion of an image extracted from the web page, that is provided from the resource data store.
In some examples, data for the search queries 109 submitted during user sessions are stored in a data store, such as the historical data store 124. For example, the search system 120 can store received search queries in the historical data store 124.
In some examples, selection data specifying actions taken in response to search results 112 provided in response to each search query 109 are also stored in the historical data store 124, for example, by the search system 120. These actions can include whether a search result 112 was selected, e.g., clicked or hovered over with a pointer. The selection data can also include, for each selection of a search result 112, data identifying the search query 109 for which the search result 112 was provided.
In some implementations, a user can submit a search query 109 based on speech. For example, the user can speak into a microphone of a user device 106, and the user's speech can be captured as speech data (also referred to as first speech) in a data file. In some examples, the speech data is provided as a search query 109 submitted to the search system 120 through the network 102. In some implementations, the search system 120 can provide the speech data to a speech recognition system 130. In some examples, the speech recognition system 130 can process the speech data to provide text. For example, the speech recognition system 130 can process the speech data using a voice-to-text engine (also referred to as the first speech recognition engine) to provide the text. In some examples, the speech recognition system 130 provides the text to the search system 120, which processes the text as a search query to provide search results 112. In some examples, the search query can be provided for display to the user, e.g., with the search results. In this manner, the user can see how the speech was recognized, and the search query that the search results are based on.
Although the search system 120 and the speech recognition system 130 are depicted as separate systems in the example of
In accordance with implementations of the present disclosure, the user can correct a portion, e.g., one or more words, of the search query. In some examples, the user can determine that a portion of the search query is incorrect, e.g., the speech recognition for the portion did not accurately recognize the user's speech, and can indicate that the portion is to be corrected. For example, the user can select the portion of the search query displayed to the user using the user device 106. In some implementations, the user again speaks into the microphone of the user device 106, and the user's speech can be captured as portion speech data (also referred to as second speech) in a data file. In some examples, the portion speech data is provided as a re-speak of the portion of the search query and is submitted to the search system 120 through the network 102. In some implementations, the search system 120 can provide the portion speech data to the speech recognition system 130, and can include an indication that the portion speech data corresponds to a re-speak of speech input. In some examples, the speech recognition system 130 can process the portion speech data to provide revised text. For example, the speech recognition system 130 can process the portion speech data using a voice-to-text engine (also referred to as a second speech recognition engine).
In some implementations, the first speech recognition engine used to process the speech data is different from the second speech recognition engine used to process the portion speech data. In some examples, the first speech recognition engine can be used for providing relatively quick processing of the speech data with a less stringent threshold for accuracy, relative to the second speech recognition engine. For example, the first speech recognition engine can use less resources, e.g., processors, memory, and can provide results more quickly than the second speech recognition engine. In some examples, the second speech recognition engine can be used for providing more accurate processing of the portion speech data, e.g., a more stringent threshold for accuracy, relative to the first speech recognition engine. For example, the second speech recognition engine can use more resources, e.g., processors, memory, and can provide results that are more accurate than the first speech recognition engine. In some examples, although the second speech recognition engine is more complex than the first speech recognition engine, and might consume more resources, the speed, at which results are provided can be similar. For example, and as described in further detail herein, the first speech recognition engine can be processing more speech than the second speech recognition engine, e.g., the second speech recognition engine is only processing a portion of the originally submitted speech.
In some implementations, the speech recognition system 130 provides the revised text to the search system 120, which provides a revised search query based on the search query and the revised text. For example, the search system 120 replaces the portion of the search query with the revised text to provide a revised search query. The search system 120 processes the revised search query to provide revised search results 112. In some examples, the revised search query can be provided for display to the user, e.g., with the search results. In this manner, the user can see how the speech was revised, and the search query that the search results are based on.
In the depicted example, the computing device 202 displays a search interface 204 that the user 200 can use to submit search queries and receive search results. The example search interface 204 includes a search box 206, a search button 208, a search results area 210, and a microphone button 212. In some examples, search queries submitted to the search system are displayed in the search box 206, and the resulting search results a displayed in the search results area 210. In some examples, the user 200 can select the search button 208 to initiate submission of the search query to the search system. In some examples, the search query is automatically submitted to the search system without requiring the user to select the search button 208.
In accordance with implementations of the present disclosure, the user 200 provides first speech 220 as input to the search interface 204. In the depicted example, the first speech 220 includes the query [show me pictures of Maradona]. In some examples, the computing device 202 records the first speech 220 using a microphone, and generates one or more data files, e.g., .wav files, .mp3 files, that store the first speech 220 as audio data. In some implementations, the computing device 202 provides the first speech 220 to the search system. In some examples, the first speech 220 is automatically provided to the search system, e.g., the user is not required to select the search button 208. In some examples, the first speech 220 is transmitted to the search system, after the user has spoken the entirety of the first speech 220. For example, the search system 120 receives the entirety of the first speech 220 in one request. In some examples, portions of the first speech 220 are transmitted to the search system as they are spoken. For example, the search systems receives portions, e.g., words, of the first speech 220 as each portion is spoken.
In some implementations, and as described in further detail herein, the first speech 220 is processed by a speech recognition system, e.g., the speech recognition system 130 of
In some implementations, the first text is provided for display on the computing device 202. In some examples, the search system receives the first text from the speech recognition system and transmits the first text to the computing device 202. In some examples, the first text is displayed in the search box 206 as a search query 222. In some examples, the search system processes the first text as a search query to provide search results, at least some of which are sent to the computing device 202 and are displayed as search results 224 in the search results area 210. In some examples, the search query 222 is displayed to the user before the search results 224 are received and displayed by the computing device 202. For example, the first text can be received and displayed as the search query 222 in the search box 206, and the search results 224 can be subsequently received and displayed, e.g., there can be a time lag between display of the search query 222, and display of the search results 224.
In the depicted example, the search query 222 is provided as [show me pictures of Madonna]. Accordingly, the word [Maradona] was incorrectly recognized as [Madonna] by the speech recognition system. Consequently, the search results 224 include images of Madonna, the singer-songwriter, actress, and producer. That is, the search query 222, which the search results 224 are based on, is incorrect, as it should be provided as [show me pictures of Maradona].
In accordance with implementations of the present disclosure, the user 200 can correct a portion of the search query 222 to provide a revised search query, which can be submitted to the search system. In some implementations, the user 200 can provide a speech correction indication, which indicates the portion of the search query 222, e.g., the first text, that is to be corrected. For example, the user can select one or more words of the search query 222, which are to be corrected. In some examples, the user 200 can tap on the portion, e.g., the computing device 202 including a touchscreen device.
In some implementations, and as described in further detail herein, the second speech 232 and an indication that the second speech 232 corresponds to a portion that is to be corrected (also referred to as a correction indication) are provided to the speech recognition system. In some examples, the second speech 232 is processed by the speech recognition system to provide second text. In some examples, and in response to also receiving the correction indication, the speech recognition system processes the second speech 232 using a second speech recognition engine to provide the second text. In some examples, and as described in further detail herein, the second speech recognition engine is different from the first speech recognition engine.
In accordance with implementations of the present disclosure, a combined text is provided based on the first text and the second text. In some implementations, the portion of the first text, e.g., [Madonna] in the depicted example, is deleted from the first text and is replaced by the second text, e.g., [Maradona], to provide the combined text. In some implementations, the search system receives the second text from the speech recognition system and provides the combined text based on the first text and the second text.
Referring now to
In some implementations, and as depicted in the example of
In some implementations, the instead of re-speaking the portion that is to be corrected, the user speaks a phrase that provides context to the portion that is to be corrected. For example, and continuing with the example of
In some implementations, a portion that is to be corrected is not explicitly selected by the user. In the example of
In some implementations, the microphone is automatically activated in the event that a portion is to be corrected. For example, and as discussed above, the microphone can be automatically activated in response to user selection of a portion that is to be corrected. In some examples, the microphone can be automatically activated after the search query is displayed to the user. In this manner, the user can provide second speech without requiring the user to first activate the microphone.
In some implementations, the input data 306 includes audio data of first speech (speech data) provided by a user to the search system. With reference to the example of
In some examples, the first text can be selected by the first speech recognition engine based on a set of potential texts. In some examples, the first text is selected from the set of potential texts based on respective confidence scores associated with the potential texts. For example, and using the example of
In some implementations, the input data 306 includes audio data of second speech (portion speech data) provided by the user to the search system, and a correction indication. With reference to the example of
For example, in response to the input data 306 including the correction indication, the second speech recognition engine 304 is used to process the audio data. In some implementations, the output data 308 is second text based on the audio data. With reference to the example of
In some implementations, the first speech recognition engine 302 is different from the second speech recognition engine 304. In some examples, the first speech recognition engine 302 can be used for providing relatively quick processing of the speech data with a less stringent threshold for accuracy, relative to the second speech recognition engine 304. For example, the first speech recognition engine 302 can implement a less complex, less accurate speech recognition algorithm relative to the second speech recognition engine 304. In this manner, the first speech recognition engine 302 can provide relatively quick results and can use less resources, e.g., processors, memory, than the second speech recognition engine 304. In some examples, the second speech recognition engine 304 can be used for providing more accurate processing of the portion speech data, e.g., a more stringent threshold for accuracy, relative to the first speech recognition engine 302. For example, the second speech recognition engine 304 can implement a more complex, more accurate speech recognition algorithm relative to the first speech recognition engine 302. In this manner, the second speech recognition engine 304 would provide relatively slower results and can use more resources, e.g., processors, memory, than the first speech recognition engine 304, if processing the same audio data.
In some implementations, although the second speech recognition engine 302 is more complex than the first speech recognition engine 304, the speed at which results are provided and the amount of resources used to provide the results can be similar. For example, and as described in further detail herein, the first speech recognition engine 302 can be processing more audio data than the second speech recognition engine 304, e.g., the second speech recognition engine 304 is only processing a portion of the originally submitted speech. With reference to the example of
As described above, the first speech recognition engine is different from the second speech recognition engine. In some examples, the second speech recognition is different from in that the second speech recognition includes the first speech recognition engine, as well as additional functionality and/or different parameters for processing the second speech. That is, and in some examples, the second speech recognition engine is the first speech recognition with additional functionality and/or different parameters for processing the second speech.
In some implementations, the second speech is processed to provide a set of potential texts, from which the second text can be determined. In some examples, a text that is included in the first text is excluded from selection from the set of potential texts that is provided based on the second speech. For example, the portion of text that is to be corrected can be excluded from selection from the set of potential texts. Continuing with the example of
In some implementations, and in response to the second speech, the potential texts used to determine the first text can be processed to have respective entities associated with each. In some examples, the second speech can be processed and one or more entities can be associated therewith. In some implementations, entities associated with the second speech can be compared to entities associated with each of the potential texts in the set of potential texts. In some examples, the potential text having at least one entity that matches an entity associated with the second speech is selected.
By way example, and using the example of
In some implementations, a plurality of entities and information associated therewith can be stored as structured data in a knowledge graph. In some examples, a knowledge graph includes a plurality of nodes and edges between nodes. In some examples, a node represents an entity and an edge represents a relationship between entities. In some examples, the knowledge graph can be provided based on an example schema that structures data based on domains, types and properties. In some examples, a domain includes one or more types that share a namespace. In some examples, a namespace is provided as a directory of uniquely named objects, where each object in the namespace has a unique name, e.g., identifier. In some examples, a type denotes an “is a” relationship about a topic, and is used to hold a collection of properties. In some examples, a topic represents an entity, such as a person, place or thing. In some examples, each topic can have one or more types associated therewith. In some examples, a property is associated with a topic and defines a “has a” relationship between the topic and a value of the property. In some examples, the value of the property can include another topic.
First speech data is received (402). For example, a search system, e.g., the search system 120 of
The first text is provided for display (406). For example, the search system transmits the first text for display to the user device, e.g., displaying the first text as a search query in a search box of a search interface. It is determined whether a correction to the first text has been indicated (408). For example, the search system can receive a correction indication from the user device. In some examples, the correction indication can be provided in response to a user of the user device selecting a portion of the first text. In some examples, the correction indication can be provided in response to the user providing subsequent speech input. If a correction indication is not received, search results are provided for display (410). For example, the search system can determine search results that are responsive to the first text, as a search query, and can provide the search results for display.
If a correction indication is received, second speech data is received (412). For example, the search system receives second speech data from the user device. Second text based on the second speech data is received (414). For example, the search system receives the second text from a speech recognition system. In some examples, the search system provides the second speech data to the speech recognition system. Combined text is provided for display (416). For example, the search system transmits the combined text for display to the user device, e.g., displaying the combined text as a revised search query in the search box of the search interface. In some examples, the search system provides the combined text based on the first text and the second text. For example, the portion of the first text that is to be corrected can be replaced by the second text. In some examples, the portion of the first text is the entirety of the first text. In some examples, the portion of the first text is less than the entirety of the first text. Search results are provided for display (410). For example, the search system can determine search results that are responsive to the combined text, as a revised search query, and can provide the search results for display.
The example process 400 of
Implementations of the subject matter and the operations described in this specification can be realized in digital electronic circuitry, or in computer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structures disclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or in combinations of one or more of them. Implementations of the subject matter described in this specification can be realized using one or more computer programs, i.e., one or more modules of computer program instructions, encoded on computer storage medium for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus. Alternatively or in addition, the program instructions can be encoded on an artificially-generated propagated signal, e.g., a machine-generated electrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal that is generated to encode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus for execution by a data processing apparatus. A computer storage medium can be, or be included in, a computer-readable storage device, a computer-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memory array or device, or a combination of one or more of them. Moreover, while a computer storage medium is not a propagated signal, a computer storage medium can be a source or destination of computer program instructions encoded in an artificially-generated propagated signal. The computer storage medium can also be, or be included in, one or more separate physical components or media (e.g., multiple CDs, disks, or other storage devices).
The operations described in this specification can be implemented as operations performed by a data processing apparatus on data stored on one or more computer-readable storage devices or received from other sources.
The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all kinds of apparatus, devices, and machines for processing data, including by way of example a programmable processor, a computer, a system on a chip, or multiple ones, or combinations, of the foregoing The apparatus can include special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit). The apparatus can also include, in addition to hardware, code that creates an execution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., code that constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a database management system, an operating system, a cross-platform runtime environment, a virtual machine, or a combination of one or more of them. The apparatus and execution environment can realize various different computing model infrastructures, such as web services, distributed computing and grid computing infrastructures.
A computer program (also known as a program, software, software application, script, or code) can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, declarative or procedural languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, object, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program may, but need not, correspond to a file in a file system. A program can be stored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g., one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a single file dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinated files (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub-programs, or portions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communication network.
The processes and logic flows described in this specification can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform actions by operating on input data and generating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performed by, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory or a random access memory or both. Elements of a computer can include a processor for performing actions in accordance with instructions and one or more memory devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer data to, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computer need not have such devices. Moreover, a computer can be embedded in another device, e.g., a mobile telephone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile audio or video player, a game console, a Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver, or a portable storage device (e.g., a universal serial bus (USB) flash drive), to name just a few. Devices suitable for storing computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile memory, media and memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and the memory can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.
To provide for interaction with a user, implementations of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented on a computer having a display device, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquid crystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and a keyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by which the user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices can be used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example, feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g., visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input from the user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, or tactile input. In addition, a computer can interact with a user by sending documents to and receiving documents from a device that is used by the user; for example, by sending web pages to a web browser on a user's client device in response to requests received from the web browser.
Implementations of the subject matter described in this specification can be implemented in a computing system that includes a back-end component, e.g., as a data server, or that includes a middleware component, e.g., an application server, or that includes a front-end component, e.g., a client computer having a graphical user interface or a Web browser through which a user can interact with an implementation of the subject matter described in this specification, or any combination of one or more such back-end, middleware, or front-end components. The components of the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digital data communication, e.g., a communication network.
Examples of communication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and a wide area network (“WAN”), an inter-network (e.g., the Internet), and peer-to-peer networks (e.g., ad hoc peer-to-peer networks).
The computing system can include clients and servers. A client and server are generally remote from each other and typically interact through a communication network. The relationship of client and server arises by virtue of computer programs running on the respective computers and having a client-server relationship to each other. In some implementations, a server transmits data (e.g., an HTML page) to a client device (e.g., for purposes of displaying data to and receiving user input from a user interacting with the client device). Data generated at the client device (e.g., a result of the user interaction) can be received from the client device at the server.
While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of any implementation of the present disclosure or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to example implementations. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.
Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the implementations described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single software product or packaged into multiple software products.
Thus, particular implementations of the subject matter have been described. Other implementations are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In certain implementations, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 62/153,839, filed Apr. 28, 2015, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4328562 | Hashimoto | May 1982 | A |
4866778 | Baker | Sep 1989 | A |
5027406 | Roberts | Jun 1991 | A |
5500920 | Kupiec | Mar 1996 | A |
5510981 | Berger | Apr 1996 | A |
5712957 | Waibel | Jan 1998 | A |
5737724 | Atal | Apr 1998 | A |
5794189 | Gould | Aug 1998 | A |
5799273 | Mitchell | Aug 1998 | A |
5799279 | Gould | Aug 1998 | A |
5829000 | Huang | Oct 1998 | A |
5855000 | Waibel | Dec 1998 | A |
5857099 | Mitchell | Jan 1999 | A |
5864805 | Chen | Jan 1999 | A |
5909667 | Leontiades | Jun 1999 | A |
5960394 | Gould | Sep 1999 | A |
5970451 | Lewis | Oct 1999 | A |
6064959 | Young | May 2000 | A |
6067521 | Ishii | May 2000 | A |
6070140 | Tran | May 2000 | A |
6088671 | Gould | Jul 2000 | A |
6138099 | Lewis | Oct 2000 | A |
6182028 | Karaali | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192343 | Morgan | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195635 | Wright | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195637 | Ballard | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6219640 | Basu | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6286064 | King | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314397 | Lewis | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327566 | Vanbuskirk | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338035 | Mori | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6374214 | Friedland | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374220 | Kao | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374221 | Haimi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6397180 | Jaramillo | May 2002 | B1 |
6405170 | Phillips | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6490561 | Wilson | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513005 | Qin | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6581033 | Reynar | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587824 | Everhart | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606598 | Holthouse | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6735565 | Gschwendtner | May 2004 | B2 |
6912498 | Stevens | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922669 | Schalk | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7085716 | Even | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7149970 | Pratley | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7200555 | Ballard | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7216077 | Padmanabhan | May 2007 | B1 |
7310600 | Garner | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7366668 | Franz | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7383185 | Mohri | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7440895 | Miller | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7444286 | Roth | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7542902 | Scahill | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565282 | Carus | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7634408 | Mohri | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7689420 | Paek | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7756710 | Franco | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7809574 | Roth | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7840407 | Strope | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7890326 | Strope | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7930168 | Weng | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7949524 | Saitoh | May 2011 | B2 |
7949533 | Braho | May 2011 | B2 |
7974844 | Sumita | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7983912 | Hirakawa | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8036464 | Sridhar | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8155959 | Weng | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8209175 | Mukerjee | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8355914 | Joh | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8438142 | Wu | May 2013 | B2 |
8478590 | LeBeau | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8494852 | LeBeau | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8504372 | Carraux | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8620659 | Di Cristo | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8775175 | Nagel | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8831946 | Mamou | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8972240 | Brockett | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9087517 | LeBeau | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9123339 | Shaw | Sep 2015 | B1 |
9190055 | Kiss | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9263048 | LeBeau | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9418152 | Nissan | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9466287 | LeBeau et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9542932 | LeBeau et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9711145 | LeBeau et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9875738 | Skobeltsyn | Jan 2018 | B2 |
20010041978 | Crespo | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020052740 | Charlesworth | May 2002 | A1 |
20020052742 | Thrasher | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091520 | Endo | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111990 | Wood | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020138265 | Stevens | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030104839 | Kraft | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030182113 | Huang | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187642 | Ponceleon | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200093 | Lewis | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216912 | Chino | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229497 | Wilson | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006481 | Kiecza | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030556 | Bennett | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040153321 | Chung | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040249637 | Baker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005240 | Reynar | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033574 | Kim et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050043949 | Roth | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050055209 | Epstein | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086059 | Bennett | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091054 | Thrasher | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050102140 | Davne | May 2005 | A1 |
20050203751 | Stevens | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256710 | Pankert | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060036438 | Chang | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041427 | Yegnanarayanan | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060085186 | Ma | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095268 | Yano | May 2006 | A1 |
20060149551 | Ganong | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060215821 | Rokusek | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060287868 | Ikeda | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293889 | Kiss | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293890 | Blair | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001012 | Kim | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070005372 | Huning | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033037 | Mowatt | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070073540 | Hirakawa | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070094022 | Koo | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070100635 | Mahajan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070106492 | Kim | May 2007 | A1 |
20070136060 | Hennecke | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070150275 | Garner | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070233482 | Lee | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080052073 | Goto | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059167 | Poultney | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059186 | Mowatt | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077859 | Schabes | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080126091 | Clark | May 2008 | A1 |
20080162137 | Saitoh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080235017 | Satomura | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243507 | Gopinath | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080300874 | Gavalda | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319744 | Goldberg | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090012792 | Low | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090067719 | Sridhar | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090271189 | Agapi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090306980 | Shin | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090306995 | Weng | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090313016 | Cevik | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326938 | Marila | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090327279 | Adachi | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004930 | Strope | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100076765 | Zweig | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100179801 | Huynh | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179812 | Jang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100287486 | Coddington | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110054900 | Phillips | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066970 | Burrier | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110112837 | Kurki-Suonio | May 2011 | A1 |
20110112921 | Kennewick | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125499 | Griggs | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137653 | Ljolje | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145224 | Bangalore | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161079 | Gruhn | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110161347 | Johnston | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110166851 | LeBeau | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110202386 | Hamlisch | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120016671 | Jaggi | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022868 | LeBeau | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120059652 | Adams | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120059653 | Adams | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120203776 | Nissan | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120215539 | Juneja | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120232904 | Zhu | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130030805 | Suzuki | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130262117 | Heckmann | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130304467 | LeBeau | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140058732 | Labsky et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140108453 | Venkataraman | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150058018 | Georges | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150294668 | LeBeau | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160063994 | Skobeltsyn | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160063998 | Krishnamoorthy | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092447 | Venkataraman | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170270926 | LeBeau et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1538383 | Oct 2004 | CN |
1555553 | Dec 2004 | CN |
1758211 | Apr 2006 | CN |
101042867 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101238508 | Aug 2008 | CN |
1094445 | Apr 2001 | EP |
2009-086063 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2008090625 | May 2010 | JP |
2009097292 | Sep 2009 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Frey, B., et al., “Algonquin: Iterating Laplace's Method to Remove Multiple Types of Acoustic Distortion for Robust Speech Recognition”, EUROSPEECH 2001 Scandinavia, 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, Aalborg, Denmark, Sep. 3-7, 2001, [online]. research.microsoft.com [retrieved on Nov. 23, 2010]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/76516/2001-frey-eurospeech.pdf>, 4 pages. |
Kristjansson, T., et al., “Super-Human Multi-Talker Speech Recognition: The IBM 2006 Speech Separation Challenge System”, INTERSPEECH 2006: ICSLP; Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Process, Sep. 17-21, 2006, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, Bonn, ISCA, 2006, 4 pages. |
Zweig, G., “New Methods for the Analysis of Repeated Utterances”, INTERSPEECH 2009, 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Brighton, United Kingdom, Sep. 6-10, 2009, 4 pages. |
Zweig, G., et al., “Structured Models for Joint Decoding of Repeated Utterances”, INTERSPEECH 2008, 9th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Brisbane, Australia, Sep. 22-26, 2008, 4 pages. |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 201180008973.4 dated Sep. 5, 2014, 21 pages (with English translation). |
European Search Report for Application No. EP 12186886.3 dated Feb. 25, 2013; 6 pages. |
G-mail Screenshot representing spell-check functionality available at least as of Oct. 10, 2010, 1 page. |
International Search Report & Written Opinion, Patent Cooperation Treaty, PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/057313, dated Mar. 29, 2013. 7 pages. |
Quillsoft “What Can I Do With WordQ?” [online] [retrieved from the internet] http://web.archive.org/web/20080623083540/www.wordq.com/wordq2english.html (2008) 3 pages. |
Quillsoft “What Can I Do With SpeakQ?” [online] [retrieved from the internet] http://web.archive.org/web/20080611104620/www.wordq.com/speakqenglish.html (2008) 4 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2011/020218, dated May 14, 2015, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US2011/020218, dated Apr. 24, 2015, 11 pages. |
Extended European Search Report issued in European Application No. 11732082.0 dated May 19, 2016, 9 pages. |
European Search Report in European Application No. EP16165438, dated Sep. 23, 2016, 8 pages. |
Notice of Office Action issued in Korean Application No. 10-2012-7020493, dated Feb. 27, 2017, 17 pages (with English translation). |
Office Action issued in Chinese Application No. 20150420200.7, dated Jul. 3, 2017, 11 pages (English translation). |
Arisoy et al. “Lattice Extension and Vocabulary Adaptation for Turkish LVCSR,” in IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech, and Language Processing, vol. 17(1) Jan. 2009, pp. 163-173. |
Jennequin et al. “Modeling Duration via Lattice Rescoring,” 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing—Apr. 2007, pp. IV-641-IV-644. |
Office Action issued in Korean Application No. 10-2017-7017613, dated Sep. 26, 2017, 7 pages (English translation). |
Office Action issued in European Application No. 16165438.9, dated Dec. 15, 2017, 5 pages. |
Office Action issued in European Application No. 16165438.9, dated Oct. 16, 2018, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160322049 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62153839 | Apr 2015 | US |