This description relates to operation of sensor networks such as those used for security, intrusion and alarm systems installed on commercial or residential premises.
It is common for businesses and homeowners to have a security system for detecting alarm conditions at their premises and signaling the conditions to a monitoring station or to authorized users of the security system. Security systems often include an intrusion detection panel that is electrically or wirelessly connected to a variety of sensors. Those sensors types typically include motion detectors, cameras, and proximity sensors (used to determine whether a door or window has been opened). Typically, such systems receive a very simple signal (electrically open or closed) from one or more of these sensors to indicate that a particular condition being monitored has changed or become unsecure.
Typical intrusion systems can be set up to monitor entry doors in a building. When the door is secured, the proximity sensor senses a magnetic contact and produces an electrically closed circuit. When the door is opened, the proximity sensor opens the circuit, and sends a signal to the panel indicating that an alarm condition has occurred (e.g., an opened entry door). Government entities, companies, academic institutions, etc. issue credentials to employees, contractors, students, etc. to control access to buildings and facilities, indoors and outdoors. Individuals who bypass security systems to gain access, either intentionally or unintentionally, are difficult to identify and locate.
Prior solutions regarding credentials have focused on technologies such as video surveillance to address access problems. Once a person has gained access, however, it is difficult to impossible to distinguish between those with valid credentials and those without valid credentials.
According to an aspect of a system for physical intrusion detection/alarm monitoring includes one or more computing devices, including processor devices and memory in communication with the processor devices, configured to correlate sensory input from credentials or badges with video, receive sensory inputs from credentials or badges within a monitored premises, receive video information from cameras and other image capture devices disposed throughout the premises, and continually correlate the received sensory inputs from these credentials or badges with the received video.
One or more of the following are some of the embodiments within the scope of this aspect. system is further configured to apply one or more algorithms to detect the presence of a possible non-credentialed individual and track at least the non-credentialed individual and produce an alert to send to a control center to alert authorities to the location of the non-credentialed individual. The system is further configured to apply video recognition to identify the number of people in a certain area and correlate that data with data from one or more remote badge readers to identify the appropriately number of badged individuals in a group of individuals within a monitored area. The system is further configured to determine a mismatch between the number of individuals in the area and a number of read badges or credentials. The system is further configured to continually track all individuals and their movements throughout the premises, correlate those movements with different readings of valid credentials or badges to isolate one or more non-credentialed individuals. The one or more computing devices include an application layer that executes routines to provide node functions that can be dynamically changed. At least some of the nodes are cameras and others are credential readers. Certain of the nodes are configured to apply video recognition to frames of captured video to recognize features that correspond to individuals appearing in the captured frames and determine a number of people within the image. In one or more of the certain nodes, the one or more of the certain nodes are configured to change the video recognition algorithm that is applied to find features that correspond to a number of individuals. The system is further configured to correlate paths taken by different individuals with different readings of valid credentials or badges from the same or different sets of cameras/readers.
One or more aspects may provide one or more of the following advantages.
By correlating sensory input from credentials or badges that use technologies such as RFID, Bluetooth low energy (BLE), MAC addresses from cell phones, NFC, etc. with video; individuals without valid credentials can be identified and tracked. Video recognition is used to identify the number of people in a certain area. A remote reading badge is used to identify the appropriately badged employees by tracking the personnel movement and correlating that with the movement of the valid ID. Once the non-badged individual is segregated from the valid personnel, biometrics such as face, iris or just video recognition are used to track the individual(s) and allow authorities to intervene.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention is apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Described herein are examples of network features that may be used in various contexts including, but not limited to, security/intrusion and alarm systems. Example security systems may include an intrusion detection panel that is electrically or wirelessly connected to a variety of sensors. Those sensors types may include motion detectors, cameras, and proximity sensors (used, e.g., to determine whether a door or window has been opened). Typically, such systems receive a relatively simple signal (electrically open or closed) from one or more of these sensors to indicate that a particular condition being monitored has changed or become unsecure.
For example, typical intrusion systems can be set-up to monitor entry doors in a building. When a door is secured, a proximity sensor senses a magnetic contact and produces an electrically closed circuit. When the door is opened, the proximity sensor opens the circuit, and sends a signal to the panel indicating that an alarm condition has occurred (e.g., an opened entry door).
Data collection systems are becoming more common in some applications, such as home safety monitoring. Data collection systems employ wireless sensor networks and wireless devices, and may include remote server-based monitoring and report generation. As described in more detail below, wireless sensor networks generally use a combination of wired and wireless links between computing devices, with wireless links usually used for the lowest level connections (e.g., end-node device to hub/gateway). In an example network, the edge (wirelessly-connected) tier of the network is comprised of resource-constrained devices with specific functions. These devices may have a small-to-moderate amount of processing power and memory, and may be battery powered, thus requiring that they conserve energy by spending much of their time in sleep mode. A typical model is one where the edge devices generally form a single wireless network in which each end-node communicates directly with its parent node in a hub-and-spoke-style architecture. The parent node may be, e.g., an access point on a gateway or a sub-coordinator which is, in turn, connected to the access point or another sub-coordinator.
Referring now to
In an upper tier or hierarchical level 12a of the network are disposed servers and/or virtual servers 14 running a “cloud computing” paradigm that are networked together using well-established networking technology such as Internet protocols or which can be private networks that use none or part of the Internet. Applications that run on those servers 14 communicate using various protocols such as for Web Internet networks XML/SOAP, RESTful web service, and other application layer technologies such as HTTP and ATOM. The distributed network 10 has direct links between devices (nodes) as shown and discussed below.
The distributed network 10 includes a second logically divided tier or hierarchical level 12b, referred to here as a middle tier that involves gateways 16 located at central, convenient places inside individual buildings and structures. These gateways 16 communicate with servers 14 in the upper tier whether the servers are stand-alone dedicated servers and/or cloud based servers running cloud applications using web programming techniques. The middle tier gateways 16 are also shown with both local area network 17a (e.g., Ethernet or 802.11) and cellular network interfaces 17b.
The distributed network topology also includes a lower tier (edge layer) 12c set of devices that involve fully-functional sensor nodes 18 (e.g., sensor nodes that include wireless devices, e.g., transceivers or at least transmitters, which in
Constrained computing devices 20 as used herein are devices with substantially less persistent and volatile memory other computing devices, sensors in a detection system. Currently examples of constrained devices would be those with less than about a megabyte of flash/persistent memory, and less than 10-20 kbytes of RAM/volatile memory). These constrained devices 20 are configured in this manner; generally due to cost/physical configuration considerations.
In a typical network, the edge (wirelessly-connected) tier of the network is comprised of highly resource-constrained devices with specific functions. These devices have a small-to-moderate amount of processing power and memory, and often are battery powered, thus requiring that they conserve energy by spending much of their time in sleep mode. A typical model is one where the edge devices generally form a single wireless network in which each end-node communicates directly with its parent node in a hub-and-spoke-style architecture. The parent node may be, e.g., an access point on a gateway or a sub-coordinator which is, in turn, connected to the access point or another sub-coordinator.
Each gateway is equipped with an access point (fully functional node or “F” node) that is physically attached to that access point and that provides a wireless connection point to other nodes in the wireless network. The links (illustrated by lines not numbered) shown in
The WSN 10 implements a state machine approach to an application layer that runs on the lower tier devices 18 and 20. Discussed below is an example of a particular implementation of such an approach. States in the state machine are comprised of sets of functions that execute in coordination, and these functions can be individually deleted or substituted or added to in order to alter the states in the state machine of a particular lower tier device.
The WSN state function based application layer uses an edge device operating system (not shown, but such as disclosed in the above mentioned provisional application) that allows for loading and execution of individual functions (after the booting of the device) without rebooting the device (so-called “dynamic programming”). In other implementations, edge devices could use other operating systems provided such systems allow for loading and execution of individual functions (after the booting of the device) preferable without rebooting of the edge devices.
Referring now to
The process 30 executes on the one or more computers, and receives 32 sensory inputs from credentials or badges within a monitored premises. Sensors such as some of the nodes in
The process 30 seeks to track individuals, especially individuals without valid credentials or badges for a particular monitored area. The process 30 applies one or more algorithms that detect the presence of a possible non-credentialed individual, tracks 38 at least the non-credentialed individual, alerts 40 authorities of the presence of a non-credentialed individual within the premises, and continually processing of inputs to isolate tracking of the non-credentialed individual to a particular, e.g., pinpoint location and alert 42 authorities to the isolated location of the non-credentialed individual.
During processing in
Referring now to
A remote badge reader that can be one of the nodes in the network 10 has a range that coincides, or overlaps or otherwise can be correlated to the area that was captured in the video frames. This remote badge reader and camera can be considered as a current set.
The computer(s) receives 64 badge/tag data from those individuals that are within the range of operation of the badge reader. The remote badge reader and/or computer(s) determines 66 the number of badged individuals that pass through the region within the range of operation of the remote badge reader. If the area captured by the remote badge reader coincides with the area captured by the camera, this data can be processed, otherwise they may be some correlation (not shown) need to correlate the area captured in the video frames with the area within the range of the card reader.
The computer compares the number of recognized individuals in frames to the number of received badges from the reader. If the process 60 determines that there is a mismatch between the number of individuals in the area and a number of badges (or credentials), the process 60 continues (generally, the processing 38 of
The process 60 correlates the paths taken by different individuals with different readings of valid credentials or badges from the same or different sets of cameras/readers.
For example, at this junction more sophisticated recognition algorithms, e.g., facial recognition, etc. can be used. In addition, processing algorithms can be sent to other nodes in the network to train process on the tracked individuals where the nodes that are send these algorithms are selected based on an estimation or prediction of direction/paths of travel through the premises.
At some point as individuals come and go, a non-badged/credentialed individual can be isolated individually or to a small group, and then the process will focus tracking on that individual. At any point in processing where there is a discrepancy an alarm can be raised. As the process detects the presence of new individuals and detects the departure of previously tracked individuals from the group of individuals, the process is still continually tracking the one or more individuals without valid credentials. Newly added individuals can be recognized in the video captured, especially if more intensive algorithms are used, and departing individuals can be noted by a valid reading of their tags/credentials. If an individual departs without a valid tag read, when is should have been read, that person is most likely the non-credentialed individual.
As previously mentioned, using the network 10 of
Examples of updated processing include sending more sophisticated recognition algorithms to video cameras or nodes that process the video information. Other examples are that certain ones of the nodes in
Thus, the servers of
The nodes may be implemented using any appropriate type of computing device, such as a mainframe work station, a personal computer, a server, a portable computing device, or any other type of intelligent device capable of executing instructions, connecting to a network, and forwarding data packets through the network. The nodes can execute any appropriate computer programs to generate, receive, and transmit data packets for use on the network.
The sensors provide in addition to an indication that something is detected in an area within the range of the sensors, detailed additional information that can be used to evaluate what that indication may be without the intrusion detection panel being required to perform extensive analysis of inputs to the particular sensor.
For example, a motion detector could be configured to analyze the heat signature of a warm body moving in a room to determine if the body is that of a human or a pet. Results of that analysis would be a message or data that conveys information about the body detected. Various sensors thus are used to sense sound, motion, vibration, pressure, heat, images, and so forth, in an appropriate combination to detect a true or verified alarm condition at the intrusion detection panel.
Recognition software can be used to discriminate between objects that are a human and objects that are an animal; further facial recognition software can be built into video cameras and used to verify that the perimeter intrusion was the result of a recognized, authorized individual. Such video cameras would comprise a processor and memory and the recognition software to process inputs (captured images) by the camera and produce the metadata to convey information regarding recognition or lack of recognition of an individual captured by the video camera. The processing could also alternatively or in addition include information regarding characteristic of the individual in the area captured/monitored by the video camera. Thus, depending on the circumstances, the information would be either metadata received from enhanced motion detectors and video cameras that performed enhanced analysis on inputs to the sensor that gives characteristics of the perimeter intrusion or a metadata resulting from very complex processing that seeks to establish recognition of the object.
Sensor devices can integrate multiple sensors to generate more complex outputs so that the intrusion detection panel can utilize its processing capabilities to execute algorithms that analyze the environment by building virtual images or signatures of the environment to make an intelligent decision about the validity of a breach.
Memory stores program instructions and data used by the processor of the intrusion detection panel. The memory may be a suitable combination of random access memory and read-only memory, and may host suitable program instructions (e.g. firmware or operating software), and configuration and operating data and may be organized as a file system or otherwise. The stored program instruction may include one or more authentication processes for authenticating one or more users. The program instructions stored in the memory of the panel may further store software components allowing network communications and establishment of connections to the data network. The software components may, for example, include an internet protocol (IP) stack, as well as driver components for the various interfaces, including the interfaces and the keypad. Other software components suitable for establishing a connection and communicating across network will be apparent to those of ordinary skill.
Program instructions stored in the memory, along with configuration data may control overall operation of the panel.
The monitoring server includes one or more processing devices (e.g., microprocessors), a network interface and a memory (all not illustrated). The monitoring server may physically take the form of a rack mounted card and may be in communication with one or more operator terminals (not shown). An example monitoring server is a SURGARD™ SG-System III Virtual, or similar system.
The processor of each monitoring server acts as a controller for each monitoring server, and is in communication with, and controls overall operation, of each server. The processor may include, or be in communication with, the memory that stores processor executable instructions controlling the overall operation of the monitoring server. Suitable software enable each monitoring server to receive alarms and cause appropriate actions to occur. Software may include a suitable Internet protocol (IP) stack and applications/clients.
Each monitoring server of the central monitoring station may be associated with an IP address and port(s) by which it communicates with the control panels and/or the user devices to handle alarm events, etc. The monitoring server address may be static, and thus always identify a particular one of monitoring server to the intrusion detection panels. Alternatively, dynamic addresses could be used, and associated with static domain names, resolved through a domain name service.
The network interface card interfaces with the network to receive incoming signals, and may for example take the form of an Ethernet network interface card (NIC). The servers may be computers, thin-clients, or the like, to which received data representative of an alarm event is passed for handling by human operators. The monitoring station may further include, or have access to, a subscriber database that includes a database under control of a database engine. The database may contain entries corresponding to the various subscriber devices/processes to panels like the panel that are serviced by the monitoring station.
All or part of the processes described herein and their various modifications (hereinafter referred to as “the processes”) can be implemented, at least in part, via a computer program product, i.e., a computer program tangibly embodied in one or more tangible, physical hardware storage devices that are computer and/or machine-readable storage devices for execution by, or to control the operation of, data processing apparatus, e.g., a programmable processor, a computer, or multiple computers. A computer program can be written in any form of programming language, including compiled or interpreted languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as a stand-alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unit suitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program can be deployed to be executed on one computer or on multiple computers at one site or distributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a network.
Actions associated with implementing the processes can be performed by one or more programmable processors executing one or more computer programs to perform the functions of the calibration process. All or part of the processes can be implemented as, special purpose logic circuitry, e.g., an FPGA (field programmable gate array) and/or an ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit).
Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, and any one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only storage area or a random access storage area or both. Elements of a computer (including a server) include one or more processors for executing instructions and one or more storage area devices for storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will also include, or be operatively coupled to receive data from, or transfer data to, or both, one or more machine-readable storage media, such as mass storage devices for storing data, e.g., magnetic, magneto-optical disks, or optical disks.
Tangible, physical hardware storage devices that are suitable for embodying computer program instructions and data include all forms of non-volatile storage, including by way of example, semiconductor storage area devices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash storage area devices; magnetic disks, e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM and DVD-ROM disks and volatile computer memory, e.g., RAM such as static and dynamic RAM, as well as erasable memory, e.g., flash memory.
In addition, the logic flows depicted in the figures do not require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In addition, other actions may be provided, or actions may be eliminated, from the described flows, and other components may be added to, or removed from, the described systems. Likewise, actions depicted in the figures may be performed by different entities or consolidated.
Elements of different embodiments described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Elements may be left out of the processes, computer programs, Web pages, etc. described herein without adversely affecting their operation. Furthermore, various separate elements may be combined into one or more individual elements to perform the functions described herein.
Other implementations not specifically described herein are also within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to provisional U.S. Patent Application 61/973,962, filed on Apr. 2, 2014, entitled: “Wireless Sensor Network”, and provisional U.S. Patent Application 61/946,054, filed on Feb. 28, 2014, entitled: “Wireless Sensor Network”, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4581634 | Williams | Apr 1986 | A |
5406327 | Guarnotta | Apr 1995 | A |
5414812 | Filip et al. | May 1995 | A |
5727055 | Ivie et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5977913 | Christ | Nov 1999 | A |
6012150 | Bartfai et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6032239 | Beelitz | Feb 2000 | A |
6112237 | Donaldson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6208247 | Agre et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6272621 | Key et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6313549 | Moisan et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335688 | Sweatte | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6513108 | Kerr et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6531963 | Nyfelt | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6636900 | Abdelnur | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6658234 | Dogan et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6741165 | Langfahl et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6757008 | Smith | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6771385 | Iizuka et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6804790 | Rhee et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812970 | McBride | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6836843 | Seroussi et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6838992 | Tenarvitz | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6867683 | Calvesio et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6873260 | Lancos et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888459 | Stilp | May 2005 | B2 |
6924732 | Yokoo | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6933849 | Sawyer | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6952574 | Tealdi et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6970183 | Monroe | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6972683 | Lestienne et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6976032 | Hull et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7003291 | Zhnag | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7005971 | Stewart et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7017171 | Horlander et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7028018 | Kocher | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7176808 | Broad et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7212563 | Boyd et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222239 | Smith | May 2007 | B2 |
7286158 | Griebenow | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7295106 | Jackson | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7313399 | Rhee et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7327251 | Corbett, Jr. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7365645 | Heinze et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7382895 | Bramblet | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7441043 | Henry et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7474330 | Wren et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7477154 | Braunstein | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7512406 | Dorfman | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7525594 | Tatamiya et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7535687 | Costa | May 2009 | B2 |
7545326 | Caliri et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7564357 | Baranowski et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7636046 | Caliri et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7664481 | Braunstein | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7688808 | Ren et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689221 | Gazzard | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7705736 | Kedziora | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7756828 | Baron et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7804849 | Mahany et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7834766 | Sawyer | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7855635 | Cohn et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7884712 | Nierenberg et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7899006 | Boyd | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907053 | Wildman et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7907753 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908020 | Pieronek | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7916026 | Johnson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7920843 | Martin et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7956746 | Truscott et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966660 | Yermal et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7978082 | Braunstein | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8009034 | Dobson et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8073964 | Dunk | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8089910 | Doh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8107397 | Bagchi et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
8115622 | Stolarczyk et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8115862 | Umeyama et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8310364 | Harry et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8149849 | Osborn et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8164443 | Alston et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8171524 | Micali et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8207814 | Biles et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8260893 | Bandhole et al. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8305196 | Kennedy et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8305842 | Holdsworth | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8311558 | Davidson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8319635 | Perkins et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331544 | Kraus et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8335164 | Liu | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8350700 | Fast et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8380558 | Sharma et al. | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8390442 | Burns et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8395494 | Trundle et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8400268 | Malik et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8406480 | Grigsby et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8428550 | Larsen | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8457656 | Perkins et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8463619 | Scarola | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8467763 | Martin et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8477687 | Iwasa | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8487762 | McMullen et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8488589 | Rudnick et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499164 | Ortiz et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8502644 | Newman et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8502670 | Cha et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8525665 | Trundle et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8527640 | Reisman | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8537714 | Liu | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8559344 | Abusch-Magder et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8566413 | Horvitz | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572290 | Mukhopadhyay et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8572600 | Chung et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8572677 | Bartholomay et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8578153 | Johansson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8582431 | Johansen | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8587670 | Wood et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8599011 | Schantz et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611323 | Berger et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8618916 | Gravelle et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8624733 | Cusack, Jr. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8629755 | Hashim-Waris | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8630820 | Amis | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8633803 | Mo et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8633829 | Cavanaugh | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8634788 | Wright et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8635126 | Risnoveanu et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8643719 | Vian et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8644165 | Saarimaki et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8659417 | Trundle et al. | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8659420 | Salvat, Jr. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8667571 | Raleigh | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8670873 | Shloush et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8675920 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8676930 | Foisy | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8682541 | Best et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8686851 | Davis | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8689290 | Buer | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8694275 | Wang et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8696430 | Wells | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8699377 | Veillette | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700747 | Spitaels et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8700749 | Elliott et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8707397 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
8707431 | Stephens et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8711197 | Dickerson et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8711704 | Werb et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8715178 | Price et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8723972 | Hinkel et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8725175 | Altman et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8727225 | Zumsteg et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8730838 | Liang et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8731689 | Platner et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732255 | Odio et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8732292 | Tokunaga et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8737957 | Raleigh | May 2014 | B2 |
8739176 | Darling | May 2014 | B1 |
8742908 | Boudy | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8742929 | Sawyer | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8750513 | Renkis | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8752106 | Renkis | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8848721 | Turunen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8989053 | Skaaksrud et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9037152 | Herrera et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9277352 | Ward | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9384607 | Copeland | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9892574 | Schlechter | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9905101 | Billau | Feb 2018 | B1 |
9996997 | Lambert | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10282852 | Buibas | May 2019 | B1 |
10692364 | Rao | Jun 2020 | B1 |
11024105 | Brand | Jun 2021 | B1 |
20020057204 | Bligh | May 2002 | A1 |
20020067259 | Fufidio | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020113879 | Battle et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020121979 | Smith | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030023874 | Prokupets | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030043763 | Grayson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030075287 | Weik, III | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086591 | Simon | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097464 | Martinez et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097586 | Mok | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099221 | Rhee | May 2003 | A1 |
20030169337 | Wilson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187612 | Miyake | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216144 | Roese et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040017929 | Bramblet | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040027242 | Venetianer | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040027243 | Carrender | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040090329 | Hitt | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103164 | Tabuchi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103165 | Nixon et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040105006 | Lazo | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109059 | Kawakita | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040135694 | Nyfelt | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040153671 | Schuyler | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169587 | Washington | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199785 | Pederson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050018049 | Falk | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050052281 | Bann | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050104727 | Han | May 2005 | A1 |
20050143133 | Bridgelall | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162515 | Venetianer | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050179553 | Fujie | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060022816 | Yukawa | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031838 | Chrabieh | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060035205 | Dobson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039356 | Rao | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047666 | Bedi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060059557 | Markham et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064477 | Renkis | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060143439 | Arumugam et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060171570 | Brendley et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060240818 | McCoy et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258427 | Rowe et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060268901 | Choyi et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282886 | Gaug | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060285579 | Rhee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011683 | Helander | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013776 | Venetianer | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070018826 | Nowak et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070028119 | Mirho | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040672 | Chinigo | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058634 | Gupta et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073861 | Amanuddin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070086626 | Mariani | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093975 | Hoogenboom | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070094716 | Farino et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106775 | Wong | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112574 | Greene | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112943 | Fisher et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130589 | Davis et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136102 | Rodgers | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147425 | Lamoureux et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070176779 | Braunstein | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070182818 | Buehler | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185788 | Dillon | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186106 | Ting et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198997 | Jacops et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070223451 | Ren et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226314 | Eick et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070239350 | Zumsteg et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070248065 | Banerjea et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070252001 | Kail | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070260470 | Bornhoevd et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080002599 | Yau et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080010631 | Harvey et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080056261 | Osborn et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068150 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080068267 | Huseth | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080083018 | Prokupets | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080100704 | Venetianer | May 2008 | A1 |
20080130949 | Ivanov | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080136620 | Lee et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080137624 | Silverstrim et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144587 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080186180 | Butler et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204267 | Luterotti et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080246613 | Linstrom | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080259919 | Monga | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080291017 | Yermal et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080291855 | Bata et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080297346 | Brackmann et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002155 | Ma | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090021634 | Chang | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027225 | Farley | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090115570 | Cusack, Jr. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135007 | Donovan et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090135762 | Veillette | May 2009 | A1 |
20090146833 | Lee et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153333 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090153660 | Liu | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090174547 | Greene et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090179742 | Takeshima | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090222921 | Mukhopadhyay et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090243844 | Ishidera | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090285213 | Chen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319267 | Kurki-Suonio | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090322510 | Berger et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100013711 | Bartlett | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100019901 | Tsai | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100026802 | Titus | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052867 | Kwok et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061272 | Veillette | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100087188 | Griff | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100090829 | Pujol | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124209 | In et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100157062 | Baba | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185773 | Dunk | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194545 | Wong | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100194566 | Monden | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214058 | Walker | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217651 | Crabtree et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226342 | Colling et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238286 | Boghossian | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100295943 | Cha et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100298010 | Roth | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100324958 | Stiles et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328443 | Lynam | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110001606 | Charych | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110001812 | Kang | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110035491 | Gelvin et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110051656 | Hethuin et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110069687 | Rezvani et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110102171 | Raji et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109434 | Hadsall, Sr. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110137614 | Wheeler et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110298619 | O'Hare et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110304437 | Beeler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310779 | De Poorter et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310791 | Prakash et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120008836 | Bobbitt | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120014567 | Allegra | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120038456 | Pikkarainen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039235 | Chen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120082062 | McCormack | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092183 | Corbett et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120092502 | Knasel | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120124367 | Ota et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120127314 | Clements | May 2012 | A1 |
20120130632 | Bandyopadhyay et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120131115 | Levell et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120148102 | Moriguchi | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120158161 | Cohn et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120159579 | Pineau et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120160613 | Friedli | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120182123 | Butler et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120197986 | Chen et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201472 | Blanchflower et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120266168 | Spivak et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120286929 | Kline | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297049 | Alexander | Nov 2012 | A9 |
20120307051 | Welter | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120310423 | Taft | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120311614 | Deanna et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324245 | Sinha et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130003645 | Shapira et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130035090 | Moshfeghi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130041646 | Farley et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130042314 | Kelley | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130055282 | Yi | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130064233 | Hethuin et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130070745 | Nixon et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079028 | Klein | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086195 | Hiniker | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130099919 | Cai et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130117078 | Weik, III | May 2013 | A1 |
20130163466 | Hughes et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130219050 | Park et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130239192 | Linga et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241744 | Erdos et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130277430 | Zumsteg et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130279409 | Dublin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130317659 | Thomas et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130318529 | Bishop et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130336230 | Zou et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346229 | Martin et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140006165 | Grigg et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140006586 | Hong et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140015978 | Smith | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140035726 | Schoner | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052463 | Cashman | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052832 | Dina et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140063256 | Mongeon | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071837 | Werb et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140112126 | Claessens et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129135 | Holden et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139678 | Moriarty | May 2014 | A1 |
20140159910 | Lee et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140173583 | Follis | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140203071 | Eggert | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140222892 | Lee et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231502 | Marsico et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253706 | Noone et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267598 | Drouin | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140285315 | Wiewiora | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140324224 | Dolinshek | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150074178 | Hong et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150248299 | Rasband et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150249588 | Leon et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150257301 | Morgan et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150287301 | Locke | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150356848 | Hatch | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160057048 | Boudreaux | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160132653 | Baralay | May 2016 | A1 |
20160241815 | Baxter | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160277261 | Ansari et al. | Sep 2016 | A9 |
20160293218 | Hanis | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160344841 | Wang et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170193772 | Kusens | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170225321 | Deyle | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170270722 | Tse | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180107880 | Danielsson | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180130556 | Dobai | May 2018 | A1 |
20180181794 | Benini | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190043281 | Aman | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190141294 | Thorn | May 2019 | A1 |
20200019921 | Buibas | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200066129 | Galvez | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200394568 | Chuaypradit | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210110666 | Thomas | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210174952 | Leong | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20230009081 | Paripally | Jan 2023 | A1 |
20230206711 | Pinheiro | Jun 2023 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1217078 | May 1999 | CN |
1353849 | Jun 2002 | CN |
1672060 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1871782 | Nov 2006 | CN |
1922576 | Feb 2007 | CN |
1981313 | Jun 2007 | CN |
101067843 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101199187 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101364734 | Feb 2009 | CN |
101764759 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101951341 | Jan 2011 | CN |
101976377 | Feb 2011 | CN |
101977124 | Feb 2011 | CN |
102035738 | Apr 2011 | CN |
102170360 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102316053 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102325075 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102438333 | May 2012 | CN |
102665196 | Sep 2012 | CN |
202475489 | Oct 2012 | CN |
103139019 | Jun 2013 | CN |
103170071 | Jun 2013 | CN |
203057531 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103282886 | Sep 2013 | CN |
203368600 | Dec 2013 | CN |
103813408 | May 2014 | CN |
104168648 | Nov 2014 | CN |
724235 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0 814 393 | Dec 1997 | EP |
1 718 095 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1 885 039 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1 885 039 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2 037 426 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2005-292942 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2007193558 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2008-090861 | Apr 2008 | JP |
10-2005-0054914 | Apr 2007 | KR |
10-2007-0105430 | Oct 2007 | KR |
10-2013-0143262 | Dec 2013 | KR |
WO-0106401 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0126329 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-2004068855 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO-2007002763 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO-2007018523 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2008139203 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO-2009017687 | Feb 2009 | WO |
WO-2009079036 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO-2012138133 | Oct 2012 | WO |
WO-2013091678 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO-201 3159217 | Oct 2013 | WO |
WO-2015130654 | Sep 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Report, PCT/US/15/17450. |
Chinese Office Action dated May 30, 2018 in corresponding application No. 201580016948.9. |
Cheng, Research on AODV Routing Protocol of Wireless Network, Chinese Master's Theses Full-Text Database, Information Technology Division, Jul. 15, 2007, 79 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201580015282.5, dated Sep. 4, 2018, 18 pages. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/402,423, dated Jul. 26, 2018, 10 pages. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201580013946.4, dated Jul. 31, 2018, 15 pages. |
Office Action on U.S. Appl. No. 15/366,036 dated May 31, 2018. 5 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/946,054. |
U.S. Appl. No. 61/973,962. |
Asada et al, Wireless Integrated Network Sensors (WINS) Proceedings of the Spie, Spie, Bellingham, VA, vol. 3673, dated Mar. 1, 1999, pp. 11-18. |
Atchley, Scott, Routing Heterogeneous CCI Subnets, 2013 8 pages. |
Bhatti et al., MANTIS OS: An Embedded Multithreaded Operating System for Wireless Micro Sensor Platforms, Aug. 1, 2005, 14 pages. |
C. Perkins et al: Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, RFC3561, Jul. 2007(Jul. 1, 2007), pp. 1-37. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, 15754691.2, Tyco Fire & Security GmbH, Dec. 9, 2018. |
Depoorter, Eli, et al., Enabling Direct Connectivity Between Heterogeneous Objections in the Internet of Things Through a Network Service Oriented Architecture, http://jwcn.eurasigjournals.com/content/pdf/1687-1499-2011-61.pdf, dated Aug. 31, 2011, 14 pages. |
Dong et al., “SenSpire OS: A Predictable, Flexible, and Efficient Operating System for Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Computers, IEEE, USA, vol. 60, No. 12, Dec. 1, 2011, pp. 1788-1801. |
Dunkels et al., “Contiki—a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors”, Computational Systems Bioinformatics Conference, 2004. CSB 2004. Proceedings. 2004 IEEE Tampa, FL, USA, Nov. 16-18, 2004, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, IEEE (Comput. Soc, US), Nov. 16, 2004, pp. 455-462. |
Eugster et al., “The many faces of publish/subscribe,” ACM computing surveys (CSUR) 35.2, 2003, pp. 114-131. |
Examination Report for European Application No. 15754691.2, dated Sep. 12, 2018, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report on EP 15755330.6, dated Oct. 25, 2017, 11 pages. |
FIREWALL.CX Subnet Routing & Communications, http://www.firewall.cx/networkinq-topics/protocols/ip-subnettinq/170-subnetting-routing.html, 2000-2014, 9 pages. |
Galos et al., “Dynamic reconfiguration inwireless Sensor Networks,” Electronics, Circuits, and Systems (ICECS), 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, Dec. 12, 2010, pp. 918-921. |
Gopinath et al, A Gateway Solution for IPV6 Wireless Sensor Networks, International Conference on Ultra Modern Communications (ICUMT), Oct. 12-14, 2009, IEEE, pp. 1-6. |
Hill et al, The Platforms Enabling Wireless Sensor Networks, Communications of the ACM, dated Jun. 2004, vol. 47, No. 6, 6 pages. |
Hunkeler et al., “MQTT-S—A publish/subscribe protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” 2008 3rd International Conference on Communication Systems Software and Middleware and Workshops (COMSWARE'08), IEEE, 8 pages. |
IEI International Electronics, Tech Note 4.1, dated Nov. 28, 2005, 2 pages. |
International Extended Search Report on PCT/US00/27515, dated Oct. 18, 2001, 14 pages. |
International Search Report and Writt4en Opinion on PCT/US2015/017470, dated Jun. 9, 2015 13 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/017251, dated May 29, 2015, 21 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/17470, dated Jun. 9, 2016, 39 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/17477, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/17481, Jun. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Screen Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/17491, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/17680, dated Jun. 24, 2015, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/17688, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/17696 dated Jun. 8, 2015, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/17702 dated Jun. 17, 2015, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/17924, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/17931 dated Jun. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017212, dated Jun. 2, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017212, dated Jun. 2, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017251, dated May 29, 2015, 19 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017251, dated May 29, 2015, 35 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017477, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017481, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017491, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017688, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017696, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017702, dated Jun. 17, 2015, 16 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017924, dated Jun. 5, 2015, 12 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/0I7221, dated May 26, 2015, 11 pages. |
Koshy et al. “Remote incremental linking for energy-efficient reprogramming of sensor networks,” Wireless Sensor Networks, 2005, Proceeedings of the Second European Workshop on Istanbul, Turkey, Jan. 31-Feb. 2, 2005, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, US, Jan. 31, 2005, pp. 354-365. |
Marron et al., “FlexCup: A Flexible and Efficient Code Update Mechanism for Sensor Networks,” Jan. 1, 2006, Wireless Sensor Networks Lecture Notes in Computer Science; LNCS, Springer, Berlin, DE, pp. 212-227. |
McIntire et al, “The low power energy aware processing (LEAP) embedded networked sensor system,” Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2006. IPSN 2006. The Fifth International Conference, Nashville, TN, USA, Apr. 19-21, 2006, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701 New York, NY, 10121-0701, USA, Apr. 19, 2006, pp. 449-457. |
Microsoft, IPv6 Traffic Between Nodes on Different Subnets of an IPv4 Internetwork, Microsoft Windows XP, http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/sag_ip_v6_imp_conf6.mspx?mfr=true, dated Jun. 15, 2014, 5 pages. |
Office Action on Chinese Patent Application No. 201580019697, dated May 17, 2018. 1 page. |
Office Action on CN 201580013943.0, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 20 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580013946.4, dated May 8, 2019, 9 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580015274.0, dated Feb. 3, 2019, 13 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580015274.0, dated Jul. 3, 2019, 11 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580016167.X, dated May 2, 2018, 20 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580016167.X, dated Sep. 3, 2019, 18 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580016167.X, dated Mar. 18, 2019, 26 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580019382.5, dated Jul. 31, 2019, 17 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580019386.3, dated Jun. 4, 2019, 34 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580019691.2, dated Apr. 29, 2019, 15 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580019691.2, dated Oct. 29, 2019, 10 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580019697.X, dated Feb. 26, 2019, 20 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580020164.3 dated Mar. 27, 2019, 24 pages with translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580021841.3, dated Jun. 26, 2019, 16 pages with translation. |
Office Action on EP 15754691.2, dated May 10, 2019, 5 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15754909.8, dated May 20, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15754909.8, dated Sep. 11, 2018, 5 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755018.7, dated Jul. 9, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755018.7, dated Sep. 11, 2018, 5 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755117.7, dated Aug. 9, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755117.7, dated Oct. 4, 2018, 6 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755330.6, dated Jun. 19, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755330.6, dated Oct. 1, 2018, 5 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755456.9, dated Mar. 7, 2019, 5 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755880.0, dated Jan. 30, 2019, 5 pages. |
Shah Bhatti et al., “MANTIS OS: An Embedded Multithreaded Operating System for Wireless Micro Sensor Platforms,” Mobile Networks and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, BO, vol. 10, No. 4, Aug. 1, 2005, pp. 563-579. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15754419.8, dated Nov. 14, 2017, 6 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15754691.2, dated Nov. 3, 2017, 26 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15754818.1, dated Dec. 14, 2017, 8 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15754909.8, dated Nov. 7, 2017, 10 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15755117.7, dated Nov. 7, 2017, 10 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15755215.9, dated Nov. 20, 2017, 6 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15755293.6, dated Sep. 5, 2017, 15 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15755456.9, dated Nov. 22, 2017, 5 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15755714.1, dated Oct. 25, 2017, 11 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15755714.1, dated Oct. 25, 2017, 8 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15755880.0, dated Nov. 24, 2017, 7 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report on EP 15756099.6, dated Oct. 26, 2017, 18 pages. |
The Internet Society, Transmission of IP over InfiniBand (IPoIB), http://www.networksorcery.com/enp/rfc/rfc439l.txt, dated Apr. 2006, 15 pages. |
Zhou, Ying et al., “Mobile Agent-based Policy Management for Wireless Sensor Networks,”, Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2005, Proceedings 2005 Int'l Conference on Wuhan, China, vol. 2, Sep. 23, 2005, pp. 1207-1210. |
Zoumboulakis et al., “Active rules for sensor databases,” Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Data management for sensor networks, in conjunction with VLDB 2004, ACM, 2004, 6 pages. |
Chen et al., Enix: a lightweight dynamic operating system for tightly constrained wireless sensor platforms, Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, dated Nov. 3, 2010, 14 pages. http://sensys.acm.org/2010/Papers/p183-Chen.pdf. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/017450, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/017477, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 7 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/017481, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/017491, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/017931, dated Jul. 10, 2015, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US15/024050, dated Jul. 20, 2015, 8 pieces. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017221, dated May 26, 2015, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/017450, dated Jun. 10, 2015, 11 pages. |
Office Action on CN 201580019691.2, dated May 4, 2018, 14 pages including translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580026024.7, dated Jun. 4, 2019, 12 pages with translation. |
Office Action on JP 2016-560736, dated Aug. 27, 2019, 5 pages with translation. |
Office Action on JP 2016-560736, dated Feb. 5, 2019, 5 pages with translation. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion on PCT/US2015/024050, dated Jul. 20, 2015, 12 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Reporton EP 15755018.7, dated Oct. 26, 2017, 9 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Reporton EP 15755417.1, dated Oct. 23, 2017, 14 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Reporton EP 15774423, dated Nov. 17, 2017, 1 page. |
Supplementary European Search Reporton EP 15774423.6, dated Nov. 28, 2017, 10 pages. |
Office Action on CN 201580013946.4, dated Jan. 19, 2020, 18 pages with English language translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580015274.0, dated Feb. 7, 2020, 6 pages with English language translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580016167.X, dated Mar. 2, 2020, 13 pages with English language translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580019382.5, dated Apr. 24, 2020, 12 pages with English language translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580019386.3, dated May 7, 2020, 10 pages with English language translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580021841.3, dated Mar. 16, 2020, 10 pages with English language translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580022068.2, dated Jan. 22, 2020, 15 pages with English language translation. |
Office Action on EP 15754818.1, dated Dec. 19, 2019, 6 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755714.1, dated Jan. 17, 2020, 5 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15774423.6, dated Jan. 7, 2020, 6 pages. |
Office Action on JP 2016-560736, dated Jan. 15, 2020, 4 pages with English language translation. |
Pu, Performance Analysis and Application Research on Wireless Network Coding System based on broadcast advantage, Chinese Doctoral Theses Full-text Database, Information Technology Division, Mar. 2010, pp. 25-79. |
Qiang, Research on Wireless Sensor Network Routing Algorithm based on Dense Deployment. Chinese Master's Theses Full-text Database, Information Technology Division, May 2011, pp. 6-33. |
Extended European Search Report on EP 20168200.2, dated Jul. 13, 2020, 11 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755018.7, dated Jun. 23, 2020, 5 pages. |
Office Action on JP 2016-560736, dated Aug. 25, 2020, 6 pages with translation. |
Bhatti et al., “MANTIS OS: An Embedded Multithreaded Operating System for Wireless Micro Sensor Platforms,” Mobile Networks and Applications (MONET) Journal, Special Issue on Wireless Sensor Networks, Aug. 2005, 14 pages. |
Office Action on CN 201580019386.3, dated Jan. 6, 2021, 18 pages, with English language translation. |
Office Action on KR 10-2016-7026932, dated Dec. 21, 2020, 5 pages. |
Office Action on KR 10-2016-7026940, dated Dec. 18, 2020, 8 pages. |
Office Action on KR 10-2016-7026962, dated Dec. 18, 2020, 3 pages. |
Zhou Ying et al., “Mobile Agent-based Policy Management for Wireless Sensor Networks,” 2005 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, Sep. 26, 2005, 4 pages. |
Office Action on CN 201580013946.4, dated Sep. 25, 2020, 13 pages with English translation. |
Office Action on KR 10-2016-7026933 dated Oct. 13, 2020, 12 pages with English translation. |
Liang, “Social Network Service,” Mar. 31, 2013, pp. 137-138. English language translation unavailable. |
Office Action on CN 201580022068.2, dated Aug. 26, 2020, 13 pages with English translation. |
Office Action on EP 15774423.6, dated Oct. 6, 2020, 5 pages. |
Office Action on KR 10-2016-7030734, dated Mar. 25, 2021, 16 pages with English language translation. |
Office Action on EP 15755293.6, dated Feb. 3, 2021, 10 pages. |
Office Action on CN 201580021841.3, dated Mar. 8, 2021, 15 pages with English language translation. |
Office Action on CN 201580022068.2, dated Mar. 2, 2021, 7 pages, with English translation. |
Office action on KR 10-2016-7026929, dated Mar. 16, 2021, 34 pages with English translation. |
Yu, Zhaochun, “Development of Study on Data Storage and Access in Wireless Sensor Network,” Chinese Journal of Electronics, vol. 36, No. 10, 10 pages. |
Zhang, Huixiang, “Network Control and Application,” Press of Northwest Polytechnical University, p. 41, Aug. 2013, 4 pages. |
Office Action on EP 15755117.7, dated Jan. 13, 2021, 4 pages. |
Dunkels et al., “Conticki—a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors,” 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks, Nov. 16-18, 2004, pp. 455-462. |
Office Action on KR 10-2016-7026981, dated May 30, 2021, 11 pages with English language translation. |
Office Action on KR 10-2016-7026998, dated Jun. 30, 2021, 18 pages with English language translation. |
European Office Action on EP Appl. No. 15755714.1 dated Mar. 9, 2023 (3 pages). |
European Office Action on EP Appl. No. 20168200.2 dated Feb. 28, 2022 (5 pages). |
European Office Action on EP Appl. No. 15755714.1 dated Jan. 25, 2022 (5 pages). |
Korean Office Action on KR Appl. No. 10-2016-7026934 dated Jan. 10, 2022 (12 pages with English language translation). |
Korean Office Action on KR Appl. No. 10-2016-7026946 dated Jan. 17, 2022 (10 pages with English language translation). |
Korean Office Action on KR Appl. No. 10-2016-7026964 dated Jan. 12, 2022 (12 pages with English language translation). |
European Office Action on EP Appl. No. 20168200.2 dated Jun. 5, 2023 (5 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150287301 A1 | Oct 2015 | US | |
20170323546 A9 | Nov 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61973962 | Apr 2014 | US | |
61946054 | Feb 2014 | US |