Aluminum alloys that contain high levels of magnesium are known to have high strength. However, aluminum alloys having high levels of magnesium are also known to be susceptible to intergranular corrosion (IGC) and stress corrosion cracking (SCC).
Broadly, the instant disclosure relates to corrosion resistant high-magnesium aluminum alloys, and methods of making the same. In one aspect, a continuously cast Al—Mg alloy sheet or plate product is provided, which includes 4 or 6-9 or 10 wt. % Mg and is resistant to both (i) stress corrosion cracking and (ii) intergranular corrosion. In one embodiment, the Al—Mg alloy comprises a plurality of grains, which have grain boundaries, and the Al—Mg alloy is substantially free of a continuous film of β-phase at the grain boundaries after the Al—Mg alloy has been age sensitized. In one embodiment, the grains of the Al—Mg alloy comprise Mg2Si precipitates.
In another aspect, methods of producing corrosion resistant high-magnesium aluminum alloys are provided. In one approach, a method includes (a) continuously casting an Al—Mg alloy comprising from about 6 wt. % to about 10 wt. % Mg, (b) hot rolling the Al—Mg alloy to a thickness of less than 6.35 mm, and (c) annealing the Al—Mg alloy via a furnace. In this approach, the annealing step comprises (i) heating the Al—Mg alloy at elevated temperature and for a time sufficient to achieve an O temper; and (ii) cooling the Al—Mg alloy. In this approach, after the cooling step, the Al—Mg alloy comprises a plurality of grains, and the Al—Mg alloy is substantially free of a continuous film of β-phase at the grain boundaries after the Al—Mg alloy has been age sensitized. In one embodiment, after the cooling step (c)(ii), the Al—Mg alloy is free of a continuous film of β-phase. In one embodiment, the heating step (c)(i) comprises heating the Al—Mg alloy to a temperature T1, wherein T1 is from about 365° C. to about 500° C., for a period of at least about 2 hours. In one embodiment, the cooling step (c)(ii) comprises first cooling the Al—Mg alloy from the temperature T1 to a temperature T2, wherein the temperature T2 is at least about 25° C. less than the temperature T1, and wherein the rate of cooling from temperature T1 to temperature T2 is not greater than about 100° C. per hour, and second cooling the Al—Mg alloy from the temperature T2 to a temperature T3, wherein T3 is at least about 100° C. less than temperature T2. In some versions of this embodiment, the cooling rate of the first cooling step is in the range of from about 30° C./hour to about 60° C./hour. In one embodiment, the cooling rate of the second cooling step is at least about 100° C./hour. In one embodiment, the continuously casting step comprises strip casting.
Various ones of the novel and inventive aspects noted hereinabove may be combined to yield various corrosion resistant high-magnesium aluminum alloy. These and other aspects, advantages, and novel features of the disclosure are set forth in part in the description that follows and will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following description and figures, or may be learned by practicing the disclosure.
a is a flow chart illustrating one embodiment of a method for producing aluminum alloy products.
b is the flow chart of
c is the flow chart of
a-7d are micrographs of an age sensitized, high-Mg alloy annealed according to a prior art flash anneal process and tested for intergranular corrosion.
a-8b are micrographs of an age sensitized high-Mg alloy produced according to one embodiment of an anneal process of the instant disclosure and tested for intergranular corrosion.
The instant disclosure relates to rolled aluminum alloy products having a high amount of magnesium and produced by a continuous casting process. The aluminum alloy products generally include at least about 4.5 wt. % magnesium, or at least about 6 wt. % magnesium, are produced via a continuous casting process, such as strip casting or slab casting, and are resistant to stress corrosion cracking and intergranular corrosion. Aluminum alloy products produced via a continuous casting process, having high amounts of magnesium, and being resistant to stress corrosion cracking and intergranular corrosion have heretofore been unknown due to, for example, magnesium bleed out and slab cracking.
The aluminum alloy products may be any rolled aluminum alloy product having a high amount of magnesium, such as those falling into the class of alloys generally categorized as 5XXX series aluminum alloys. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy products include at least about 4.5 wt. % Mg. In other embodiments, the aluminum alloy products include higher amounts of magnesium, such as at least about 6.0 wt. % Mg, or even at least about 6.1 wt. % Mg, or at least about 6.3 wt. % Mg, or even at least about 6.5 wt. % Mg. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy products include not greater than about 10 wt % Mg, such as not greater than 9.5 wt. % Mg, or not greater than about 9.0 wt % Mg, or not greater than about 8.5 wt. % Mg.
Other elements may be included in the aluminum alloy in non-incidental amounts. For example, the aluminum alloy may include up to 0.8 wt. % copper, up to 1.2 wt. % manganese, up to 0.5 wt. % chrome, up to 1.0 wt. % zinc, and up to 0.3 wt. % Zr, to name a few. When the aluminum alloy products are produced via slab casting, the aluminum alloy generally includes non-incidental amounts of beryllium, such as at least about 0.0003 wt. % beryllium. The aluminum alloy may include small amounts of incidental elements and impurities. For example, trace amounts of iron and silicon may be included in the aluminum alloy. Iron may be included in the aluminum alloy in an amount of up to 0.15 wt. %. Silicon may be included in the aluminum alloy in an amount that will allow for the precipitation of Mg2Si phase during solidification. The actual amount of Si required for this purpose will depend on the Fe content of the metal and cooling rate applied in solidification. In other embodiments, silicon may be included in the aluminum alloy as an alloying ingredient.
The rolled aluminum alloy products are resistant to stress corrosion cracking. “Resistant to stress corrosion cracking” means that, both before and after the aluminum alloy product has been age sensitized, the aluminum alloy product passes ASTM Standard G44-88, entitled “Standard Practice for Evaluating Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance of Metals and Alloys by Alternate Immersion in 3.5% Sodium Chloride” with the aluminum alloy being stressed to at least 75% of its tensile yield strength in the L-T direction. “Age sensitized” means that the aluminum alloy product has been artificially aged to a condition representative of at least 20 years of service life. For example, the aluminum alloy product may be continuously exposed to elevated temperature for several days (e.g., a temperature in the range of about 100° C.-120° C. for a period of about 7 days).
The rolled aluminum alloy products are also resistant to intergranular corrosion. “Resistant to intergranular corrosion” means that, both before and after the Al—Mg alloy has been age sensitized, the aluminum alloy product passes ASTM Standard G67-86, entitled “Standard Test Method for Determining the Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of 5XXX Series Aluminum Alloys by Mass Loss After Exposure to Nitric Acid (NAMLT Test). If the measured mass loss per ASTM G67-86 is not greater than 15 mg/cm2, then the sample is considered not susceptible to intergranular corrosion. If the mass loss is at least about than 25 mg/cm2, then the sample is considered susceptible to intergranular corrosion. If the measured mass loss is between 15 mg/cm2 and 25 mg/cm2, then further checks are conducted by microscopy to determine the type and depth of attack, whereupon one skilled in the art may determine whether there is intergranular corrosion via the microscopy results.
The rolled aluminum alloy products are produced via a continuous casting process. A continuous casting process is one in which a slab or strip is made continuously from molten metal without interruption, as described in further detail below. Continuous casting does not include ingot casting processes, such as direct chill casting, or electromagnetic casting processes, which are considered semi-continuous casting processes.
The aluminum alloy products are rolled aluminum alloy products, and may be in the form of sheet or plate. A sheet product is a rolled aluminum alloy product having a thickness greater than that of aluminum foil (e.g., at least 0.008 inch or 0.2 mm), but less than the thickness of aluminum plate (e.g., not greater than 0.249 inch). A plate product is a rolled aluminum alloy product having a thickness of at least about 0.250 inch. The rolled aluminum products are produced from a continuous casting process.
As noted, the aluminum alloy products are produced via either strip casting or slab casting. One embodiment of a strip cast aluminum alloy product 100 is illustrated in
Referring now to
The aluminum alloy products may realize resistance to stress corrosion cracking and intergranular corrosion as a result of, at least in part, due to the absence of a continuous film of β-phase at the grain boundaries and/or via the Mg2Si precipitates of the aluminum. Aluminum alloy products are polycrystalline. A “grain” is a crystal of the polycrystalline structure of the aluminum alloy, and “grain boundaries” are the boundaries that connect the grains of the of the polycrystalline structure of the aluminum alloy. “β-phase” is Al3Mg2 or Al8Mg5, and “a continuous film of β-phase” means that a continuous volume of β-phase is present at the majority of the grain boundaries. The continuity of the β-phase may be determined, for example, via microscopy at a suitable resolution (e.g., a magnification of at least 200×). “Mg2Si precipitates” means the Mg2Si constituents that form within the aluminum alloy as a result of an anneal process, aging process or an age sensitizing process. The Mg2Si precipitates are located within or at the grain boundaries of at least some of the grains of the aluminum alloy. In one embodiment, at least 0.05 volume percent of the aluminum alloy comprises Mg2Si precipitates as determined via a micrograph at a suitable resolution.
One embodiment of an aluminum alloy product having high Mg and that is substantially free of a continuous volume of β-phase at the majority of the grain boundaries is illustrated in
Some mechanical properties of the high-Mg alloys are provided in the below table.
Alloys A and H were processed in accordance with the teachings herein. Testing was completed in the L (longitudinal) direction on samples of 1 mm thickness after age sensitizing.
The aluminum alloy products of the instant disclosure may be utilized in a variety of applications, such as those requiring high strength. In one embodiment, the aluminum alloy products are utilized in a vehicle part. An “vehicle” is any motorized or non-motorized land-based vehicle, such as, for example, passenger vehicles (e.g., cars and trucks), warfare vehicles (e.g., tanks), railroad cars, bicycles, and industrial vehicles (e.g., forklifts, backhoe), to name a few. A “vehicle part” is any part suited to be produced from an aluminum alloy having the claimed amount of magnesium and that is useful in an vehicle, such as for example, body panels and stiffeners. In other embodiments, the aluminum alloy products may be utilized in a marine applications (e.g., any apparatus having an intended use in water), such as any water-based vehicle (e.g. boats, submarines), lighthouses, buoys and the like.
One embodiment of a method for producing rolled aluminum alloys products having a high amount of magnesium and that are resistant to stress corrosion cracking and intergranular corrosion is illustrated in
The continuous casting process is one of a strip casting or a slab casting process. One embodiment of a method for strip casting is illustrated in
The molten metal M directly contacts the cooled rolls R1 and R2 at regions 2 and 4, respectively. Upon contact with the rolls R1 and R2, the metal M begins to cool and solidify. The cooling metal produces an upper shell 6 of solidified metal adjacent the roll R1 and a lower shell 8 of solidified metal adjacent to the roll R2. The thickness of the shells 6 and 8 increases as the metal M advances towards the nip N. Large dendrites 10 of solidified metal (not shown to scale) are produced at the interfaces between each of the upper and lower shells 6 and 8 and the molten metal M. The large dendrites 10 are broken and dragged into a center portion 12 of the slower moving flow of the molten metal M and are carried in the direction of arrows C1 and C2. The dragging action of the flow can cause the large dendrites 10 to be broken further into smaller dendrites 14 (not shown to scale). In the central portion 12 upstream of the nip N referred to as a region 16, the metal M is semi-solid and includes a solid component (the solidified small dendrites 14) and a molten metal component. The metal M in the region 16 has a mushy consistency due in part to the dispersion of the small dendrites 14 therein. At the location of the nip N, the metal becomes substantially solid. Downstream of the nip N, the central portion 12 is a solid central layer 18 containing the small dendrites 14 sandwiched between the upper shell 6 and the lower shell 8. In the central layer 18, the small dendrites 14 may be about 20 to about 50 microns in size and have a generally globular shape.
The three layers of the upper and lower shells 6 and 8 and the solidified central layer 18 constitute a solid cast strip 20. The solid central layer 18 constitutes about 20 to about 30 percent of the total thickness of the strip 20. The molten aluminum alloy has an initial concentration of alloying elements including peritectic forming alloying elements and eutectic forming alloying elements. Alloying elements which are peritectic formers with aluminum are Ti, V, Zr and Cr. All other alloying elements are eutectic formers with aluminum, such as Si, Fe, Ni, Zn, Mg, Cu and Mn. During solidification of an aluminum alloy melt, dendrites typically have a lower concentration of eutectic formers than the surrounding mother melt and higher concentration of peritectic formers. In the region 16, in the center region upstream of the nip, the small dendrites 14 are thus partially depleted of eutectic formers while the molten metal surrounding the small dendrites is somewhat enriched in eutectic formers. Consequently, the solid central layer 18 of the strip 20, which contains a large population of dendrites, is depleted of eutectic formers (typically by up to about 20 weight percent, such as about 5 to about 20 wt. %) and is enriched in peritectic formers (typically by up to about 45 percent such, as about 5 to about 45 wt. %) in comparison to the concentration of the eutectic formers and the peritectic formers in each of the metal M, the upper shell 6 and the lower shell 8.
The rolls R1 and R2 serve as heat sinks for the heat of the molten metal M. Heat is transferred from the molten metal M to the rolls R1 and R2 in a uniform manner to ensure uniformity in the surface of the cast strip 20. Surfaces D1 and D2 of the respective rolls R1 and R2 may be made from steel or copper and are textured and include surface irregularities (not shown) which contact the molten metal M. The surface irregularities may serve to increase the heat transfer from the surfaces D1 and D2 and, by imposing a controlled degree of nonuniformity in the surfaces D1 and D2, result in uniform heat transfer across the surfaces D1 and D2. The surface irregularities may be in the form of grooves, dimples, knurls or other structures and may be spaced apart in a regular pattern of about 20 to about 120 surface irregularities per inch or about 60 irregularities per inch. The surface irregularities may have a height of about 5 to about 200 microns or about 100 microns. The rolls R1 and R2 may be coated with a material to enhance separation of the cast strip from the rolls R1 and R2 such as chromium or nickel.
The control, maintenance and selection of the appropriate speed of the rolls R1 and R2 may impact the operability. The roll speed determines the speed that the molten metal M advances towards the nip N. If the speed is too slow, the large dendrites 10 will not experience sufficient forces to become entrained in the central portion 12 and break into the small dendrites 14. Accordingly, the disclosed strip casting methodology is suited for operation at high speeds such as about 25 to about 400 feet per minute or about 100 to about 400 feet per minute or about 150 to about 300 feet per minute. The linear speed at which molten aluminum is delivered to the rolls R1 and R2 may be less than the speed of the rolls R1 and R2 or about one quarter of the roll speed. High-speed continuous casting may be achievable in part because the textured surfaces D1 and D2 ensure uniform heat transfer from the molten metal M.
The roll separating force may be a parameter in practicing the strip casting. The casting speed may be adjusted to ensure that roll force is within a predetermined range, which may ensure that solidification is completed just at the nip. Excessive molten metal passing through the nip N may cause the layers of the upper and lower shells 6 and 8 and the solid central portion 18 to fall away from each other and become misaligned. Insufficient molten metal reaching the nip N causes the strip to form prematurely as occurs in conventional roll casting processes. A prematurely formed strip 20 may be deformed by the rolls R1 and R2 and experience centerline segregation. Suitable roll separating forces are about 25 to about 300 pounds per inch of width cast or about 100 pounds per inch of width cast. In general, slower casting speeds may be needed when casting thicker gauge aluminum alloy in order to remove the heat from the thick alloy. Unlike conventional roll casting, such slower casting speeds do not result in excessive roll separating forces in the strip casting apparatus because fully solid aluminum strip is not produced upstream of the nip.
Thin gauge aluminum strip product may be cast via conventional roll casting methods. Roll separating force has been a limiting factor in producing low gauge aluminum alloy strip product by that method, but the disclosed strip casting methodology is not so limited because the roll separating forces are orders of magnitude less than some other strip casting processes. Aluminum alloy strip may be produced at thicknesses of about 0.1 inch or less at casting speeds of 25 to about 400 feet per minute. Thicker gauge aluminum alloy strip may also be produced via strip casting, for example at a thickness of about ¼ inch.
The roll surfaces D1 and D2 heat up during casting and are prone to oxidation at elevated temperatures. Nonuniform oxidation of the roll surfaces during casting can change the heat transfer properties of the rolls R1 and R2. Hence, the roll surfaces D1 and D2 may be oxidized prior to use to minimize changes thereof during casting. It may be beneficial to brush the roll surfaces D1 and D2 from time to time or continuously to remove debris which builds up during casting of aluminum and aluminum alloys. Small pieces of the cast strip may break free from the strip S and adhere to the roll surfaces D1 and D2. These small pieces of aluminum alloy strip are prone to oxidation, which may result in nonuniformity in the heat transfer properties of the roll surfaces D1 and D2. Brushing of the roll surfaces D1 and D2 avoids the nonuniformity problems from debris which may collect on the roll surfaces D1 and D2.
Aluminum alloy strip may be continuously cast via strip casting. The aluminum alloy strip 20 includes a first layer of an aluminum alloy and a second layer of the aluminum alloy (corresponding to the shells 6 and 8) with an intermediate layer (the solidified central layer 18) therebetween. The concentration of eutectic forming alloying elements in the intermediate layer is less than in the first and second layers, typically by up to about 20 wt. % such as by about 5 to about 20%. The concentration of peritectic forming alloying elements in the intermediate layer is greater than in the first and second layers, typically by up to about 45 wt. % such as by about 5 to about 45%. The grains in the aluminum alloy strip produced via strip casting may be substantially undeformed because the force applied by the rolls is low (300 pounds per inch of width or less). The strip 20 is not solid until it reaches the nip N; hence it is not hot rolled in the manner of conventional twin roll casting and does not receive typical thermo-mechanical treatment. In the absence of conventional hot rolling in the caster, the grains in the strip 20 are substantially undeformed and retain their initial structure achieved upon solidification, i.e. an equiaxial structure, such as globular.
Continuous strip casting of aluminum alloys may be facilitated by initially selecting the desired dimension of the nip N corresponding to the desired gauge of the strip S. The speed of the rolls R1 and R2 is increased to a desired speed which is less than the speed which causes the roll separating force increases to a level which indicates that rolling is occurring between the rolls R1 and R2. Casting at the rates via the disclosed strip casting process (i.e. about 25 to about 400 feet per minute) solidifies the aluminum alloy strip about 1000 times faster than aluminum alloy cast as an ingot and improves the properties of the strip over aluminum alloys cast as an ingot.
It may be beneficial to support the hot strip S exiting the rolls R1 and R2 until the strip S cools sufficiently to be self-supporting. In one embodiment, a continuous conveyor belt (not illustrated) is positioned beneath the strip S exiting the rolls R1 and R2. The belt may travel around pulleys and supports the strip S for a distance that may be about 10 feet. The length of the belt between the pulleys may be determined by the casting process, the exit temperature of the strip S and the alloy of the strip S. Suitable materials for the belt B include fiberglass and metal (e.g. steel) in solid form or as a mesh. Alternatively, the support mechanism may include a stationary support surface (not illustrated) such as a metal shoe over which the strip S travels while it cools. The shoe may be made of a material to which the hot strip S does not readily adhere. In certain instances where the strip S is subject to breakage upon exiting the rolls R1 and R2, the strip S may be cooled downstream of the rolls with a fluid such as air or water. Typically, the strip S exits the rolls R1 and R2 at about 1100° F. It may be desirable to lower the strip temperature to about 1000° F. within about 8 to 10 inches of the nip N. One suitable mechanism for cooling the strip to achieve that amount of cooling is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,823,860, incorporated herein by reference.
The strip casting method disclosed herein is especially suitable for aluminum alloy with high level of Mg. During casting, the molten metal goes through a converging channel therefore ensuring good contact with the rolls, and thus good heat transfer, at all times. This action eliminates the bleeding out of Mg from molten metal in the inner layers to the strip surface that would occur if heat transfer was lost. Another benefit is in-line hot rolling. The very high strip speeds of the caster allows for the rolling to be done with a minimum exposure of the cast strip to high temperatures. For a strip speed of 150 ft/min and a distance of 10 ft between the caster and the rolling mill, for example, the exposure time would be about 4 seconds, which is an insufficient period for any significant Mg bleed out from the solid strip by diffusion of Mg to the surface.
It is anticipated that other strip casting processes, such as twin belting casting (e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,515,908, entitled “Method and apparatus for twin belt casting of strip” to Harrington, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) could also be utilized to produce aluminum alloys having high amounts of magnesium, as described herein.
As noted above, the aluminum alloy products having a high amount of magnesium may also be produced via slab casting methods. Some methods of slab casting are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,167,830, entitled “Continuous Metal casting Apparatus” to Hazelett, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,979,538, entitled “Continuous Chain Caster and Method” to Braun et al, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The methods of these documents may require modification to account for the high amount of magnesium in the alloy, such as selection of high conductivity belts, cleaning of block surfaces and use of beryllium. Even with these modifications, Mg bleed out may still occur, and thus the strip casting processes described above are preferred.
Referring back now to
Referring now to
With respect to the heating step (422), the aluminum alloy may be heated at any suitable temperature for any suitable period of time so long as the aluminum alloy achieves an O temper. “O temper” means an annealed temper as defined by The Aluminum Association. For example, and with respect to a strip cast or slab cast sheet product, the aluminum alloy may be heated to a temperature (T1), where T1 is in the range of 365° C. to about 500° C. When the temperature is in the range of T1, the heating period may be for a period of at least about 2 hours.
Referring now to
With respect to the second faster cooling step (428), the aluminum alloy is cooled from the first cooler temperature (e.g., T2) to a second cooler temperature (e.g., T3). The second cooler temperature (T3) is generally at least about 100° C. less than the first cooler temperature (T2). The cooling rate of the second cooling step is generally at least about 100° C./hour.
An advantage of the instantly disclosed process is that the alloys do not require a separate, post-processing heat treatment, but are still resistant to stress corrosion cracking and intergranular corrosion. Thus, in one embodiment, a process for producing an aluminum alloy product is free of a heat treatment step.
The alloy may be further prepared according to conventional methodologies prior to use. For example, the alloy may be cleaned, stretched, leveled, slit, coated (e.g., by a lubricant or paint), as appropriate, and finally coiled.
An aluminum alloy consisting essentially of 6.4 wt. % Mg and 0.5 wt. % Zn, the balance being aluminum, incidental elements and impurities is strip cast. The strip cast alloys has a thickness of 3.4 mm and a width of 0.41 m. Coupons (0.75 m) are removed from the alloy and are allowed to cool to room temperature.
A first set of coupons (“Alloy 1”) are subsequently reheated to 850° F. and are hot rolled until a nominal thickness of about 1 mm is reached. Alloy 1 is then subjected to flash anneal conditions. Specifically Alloy 1 is heated in a salt bath to 950° F. for 60 seconds, and then quenched by air jets at a rate of about 90° F./second.
A first sample of Alloy 1 (Alloy 1-a) is then age sensitized and then subjected to intergranular corrosion testing per ASTM G67-86. Another sample of Alloy 1 (Alloy 1-b) is age sensitized and then subjected to a forming and paint bake cycle, which involved a transverse stretch of about 5% followed by baking at 375° F. for 30 minutes, followed by intergranular corrosion testing per ASTM G67-86. Both the Alloys 1-a and 1-b fail the intergranular corrosion tests realizing a mass loss above 25 mg/cm2. Specifically, Alloy 1-a realizes a mass loss of 30 mg/cm2, and Alloy 1-b realizes a 61-70 mg/cm2 mass loss.
Selected samples of the age sensitized, stretched and painted alloy (Alloy 1-b) are examined prior to and after corrosion tests via SEM examination of the samples, internal examination by optical microscopy and SEM and phase identification of samples after mounting and metallographic preparation. This analysis reveals that the corrosive attack was primarily at the grain boundaries and at the constituent particles within grains (
This analysis reveals that the corrosive is the attack is primarily at the grain boundaries and at the constituent particles within grains. The latter form of attack caused dimples to form at those locations. These were several μm in size and in some cases aligned. The dimples covered only a small fraction of the grains. In cross sections, penetration was found to be 2-5 grains deep. It is noted that several layers of grains would have been lost during the test and the depth observed does not reflect the full depth of attack. This was apparent also from the thinner section, “sandy” feel of the surfaces, and the visual appearance of the corroded specimen. When grain boundaries were revealed by Graff-Sargent etching, they were found to contain a continuous film of uniform width in the submicron range (˜0.1 μm). That film is likely to be the Al3Mg2 phase. The average grain size of the specimen was about 50 μm and it was fully recrystallized.
Another set of coupons (0.75 m) are removed from the alloy of Example 1 (i.e., the aluminum alloy consisting essentially of 6.4 wt. % Mg and 0.5 wt. % Zn, the balance being aluminum, incidental elements and impurities) and are allowed to cool to room temperature. This second set of coupons (“Alloy 2”) are subsequently reheated to 850° F. and are hot rolled until a nominal thickness of about 1 mm is reached. Alloy 2 is then heated in a furnace to 850° F. and held for 4 hours. Next, Alloy 2 is allowed to cool in the furnace until the temperature fell to 400° F. over a period of 5.5 hours (an average cooling rate of 82° F. per hour). Next, the furnace was opened and further cooling to 200° F. occurred over an 1.5 hour period. This method represents a typical batch anneal in a furnace.
A first sample of Alloy 2 (Alloy 2-a) is then age sensitized and then subjected to intergranular corrosion testing per ASTM G67-86. Another sample of Alloy 2 (Alloy 2-b) is age sensitized and then subjected to a forming and paint bake cycle, which involved a transverse stretch of about 5% followed by baking at 375° F. for 30 minutes, followed by intergranular corrosion testing per ASTM G67-86. Both the Alloys 2-a and 2-b pass the intergranular corrosion tests realizing a mass loss of only 3 mg/cm2 and 6 mg/cm2, respectively.
Both Alloys 2-a and 2b also subjected to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) tests according to ASTM G44-88 after age sensitization. A stress level of 75% of yield strength in the L direction is selected for this test. Each test is done in triplicate, and for a total of 40 days. No SCC failures occurred of either Alloys 2-a or 2-b within the 40 day period. This high-Mg alloy is therefore resistant to both intergranular corrosion and stress corrosion cracking.
Selected samples of the age sensitized, stretched and painted alloy (Alloy 2-b) are examined prior to and after corrosion tests via SEM examination of the samples, internal examination by optical microscopy and SEM and phase identification of samples after mounting and metallographic preparation. This analysis reveals that the material showed a dimpled appearance in the grains and substantial opening of the grain boundaries (
An aluminum alloy consisting essentially of 7.96 wt. % Mg and 0.032 wt. % Zn, the balance being aluminum, incidental elements and impurities is strip cast. The strip cast alloys has a thickness of 3.4 mm and a width of 0.41 m. Coupons (0.75 m) are removed from the alloy and are allowed to cool to room temperature. The coupons (“Alloy 3”) are subsequently reheated to 750° F. and are hot rolled until a nominal thickness of about 1 mm is reached. Alloy 3 is then processed according to the processing steps of Example 2.
Alloy 3 is then age sensitized and then subjected to intergranular corrosion testing per ASTM G67-86. Alloy 3 passes the intergranular corrosion tests realizing a mass loss of only 9.2 mg/cm2. Alloy 3 is subjected to stress corrosion cracking (SCC) tests according to ASTM G44-88 after age sensitization. A stress level of 75% of yield strength in the L direction is selected for this test. Each test is done in triplicate, and for a total of 40 days. No SCC failures occur for Alloy 3 within the 40 day period. This high-Mg alloy is therefore resistant to both intergranular corrosion and stress corrosion cracking.
While various embodiments of the present disclosure have been described in detail, it is apparent that modifications and adaptations of those embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be expressly understood that such modifications and adaptations are within the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Furthermore, the use of reference numerals in the claims and/or description are not intended to limit the claims and/or disclosure to any particular order or manner of operation, unless stated otherwise.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2693012 | Harris et al. | Nov 1954 | A |
3078563 | Gould et al. | Feb 1963 | A |
3167830 | Hazelett et al. | Feb 1965 | A |
3232796 | Anderson | Feb 1966 | A |
3346370 | Jagaciak | Oct 1967 | A |
3346371 | Jagaciak | Oct 1967 | A |
3346372 | Jagaciak | Oct 1967 | A |
3346373 | Jagaciak | Oct 1967 | A |
3346374 | Jagaciak | Oct 1967 | A |
3346375 | Jagaciak | Oct 1967 | A |
3346376 | Jagaciak | Oct 1967 | A |
3346377 | Jagaciak | Oct 1967 | A |
3366476 | Jagaciak | Jan 1968 | A |
3490955 | Winter et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3556872 | Jagaciak | Jan 1971 | A |
3582406 | Ford | Jun 1971 | A |
3617395 | Ford | Nov 1971 | A |
3708352 | Brown et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3761322 | Winter et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3831323 | Widner et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
4002197 | Hazelett et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4098957 | Vernam et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4146163 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4146164 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4151013 | Thompson et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4161553 | Vernam et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4235646 | Neufeld et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4238248 | Gyongyos et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4260419 | Robertson | Apr 1981 | A |
4282044 | Robertson et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4341261 | Thomson et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4356618 | Jordan | Nov 1982 | A |
4484614 | Maringer | Nov 1984 | A |
4626294 | Sanders, Jr. | Dec 1986 | A |
4751958 | Flowers et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4782994 | Raybould et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4823860 | Lauener | Apr 1989 | A |
4828008 | White et al. | May 1989 | A |
4828012 | Honeycutt, III et al. | May 1989 | A |
4915158 | Allyn et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4996025 | Pratt et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5015766 | Kambara et al. | May 1991 | A |
5047369 | Fleming et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053286 | Pratt et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5106429 | McAuliffe et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5125452 | Yamauchi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5181969 | Komatsubara et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5333672 | Gelfgat et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5356495 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5362523 | Gorynin et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365664 | Whitney, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
5370171 | Fields et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5400851 | Prinz et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5423925 | Shoji et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5470405 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5482107 | Judd | Jan 1996 | A |
5496423 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5514228 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515908 | Harrington | May 1996 | A |
5518064 | Romanowski et al. | May 1996 | A |
5536587 | Whitney, Jr. | Jul 1996 | A |
5564491 | Harrington | Oct 1996 | A |
5585067 | Leroy | Dec 1996 | A |
5588478 | Jin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5655593 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5728241 | Gupta et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742993 | Sun | Apr 1998 | A |
5769972 | Sun et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772799 | Sun et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5772802 | Sun et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785777 | Cantrell et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5833775 | Newton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5862582 | Sun | Jan 1999 | A |
5894879 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5934359 | Strezov | Aug 1999 | A |
5942057 | Hanamura et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5979538 | Braun et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983980 | Freeman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6044896 | Harrington | Apr 2000 | A |
RE36692 | Gupta et al. | May 2000 | E |
6056835 | Miyake et al. | May 2000 | A |
6063215 | Harrington | May 2000 | A |
6082659 | Sankaran et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102102 | Harrington | Aug 2000 | A |
6110604 | Rickerby | Aug 2000 | A |
6120621 | Jin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6135199 | Wyatt-Mair | Oct 2000 | A |
6146477 | Clark et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6193818 | Legresy et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221515 | Ramos Junior et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248193 | Zhao et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264765 | Bryant et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264769 | Benedetti | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273970 | Kopeliovich et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280543 | Zonker et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6316061 | Andler et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328823 | Deicke et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336980 | Benedetti | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6344096 | Baumann et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6391127 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6423164 | Bryant et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6537392 | Magnusen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6543122 | Perkins et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6581675 | Harrington | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6596671 | Whitney, Jr. et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6602363 | Ren | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6623797 | Avalos | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6672368 | Unal | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6681838 | Cui et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6833339 | Whitney, Jr. et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6880617 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6959476 | Li et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7089993 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7125612 | Unal | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7182825 | Unal et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7211161 | Pillet et | May 2007 | B2 |
7503378 | Unal | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7846554 | Tomes, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20020031658 | Chow et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020153123 | Unal | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167005 | Yu et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030015309 | Bouchard et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030205357 | Unal | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040007295 | Lorentzen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040035505 | Unal et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040079455 | Dif et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050183801 | Unal et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050211350 | Unal et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060213590 | Danielou et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070000637 | Wyatt-Mair et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070095499 | Tomes et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070137830 | Unal | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080254309 | Tomes et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20110036464 | Tomes et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110042032 | Tomes et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005214348 | Sep 2011 | AU |
2557417 | Mar 2010 | CA |
1942595 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101039802 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101678440 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101678444 | Mar 2010 | CN |
0321152 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0440275 | Aug 1991 | EP |
0291505 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0576170 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0576171 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0605947 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0610006 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0576170 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0851943 | May 2003 | EP |
1842935 | Oct 2007 | EP |
2142324 | Jan 2010 | EP |
1733064 | Jul 2010 | EP |
2264198 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2347023 | Jul 2011 | EP |
50117663 | Sep 1975 | JP |
51089827 | Aug 1976 | JP |
6027450 | Feb 1985 | JP |
61276751 | Dec 1986 | JP |
626742 | Jan 1987 | JP |
644458 | Jan 1989 | JP |
1202344 | Aug 1989 | JP |
01242762 | Sep 1989 | JP |
05277656 | Oct 1993 | JP |
06071303 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06145927 | May 1994 | JP |
7148557 | Jun 1995 | JP |
2000501995 | Feb 2000 | JP |
11511389 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2005504635 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2006206932 | Aug 2006 | JP |
4355342 | Aug 2009 | JP |
100861563 | Sep 2008 | KR |
1453932 | Mar 1996 | RU |
2139953 | Oct 1999 | RU |
2356998 | Feb 2005 | RU |
2284364 | Feb 2006 | RU |
2008121915 | Dec 2009 | RU |
WO 9100933 | Jan 1991 | WO |
WO 9322086 | Nov 1993 | WO |
WO 9410351 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9413472 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO 9711205 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9714520 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 02066181 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO 2004018124 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO-2005080619 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2006124045 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO 2008128055 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008128061 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2010042604 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010053675 | May 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alibaba.com; Oct. 20, 2009; “Metals Knowledge: Problems and Prospect of Al—Mg Alloys Application in Marine Constructions”; http://news.alibaba.com/article/detail/metalworking/100187103-1-metals-knowledge%253A-problems-prospect-al-mg.html; pp. 105; website print date Feb. 9, 2010. |
Cheng et al., Texture, Microstructure and Formability of SC and DC cast Al—Mg Alloys, Materials Science and Engineering: A, vol. 323, Issues 1-2, p. 32-41 (Jan. 2002). |
Dahl et al., Uber Die Aushartung von Aluminium—Magnesium-Legierungen, Z. Metallke., p. 94-99 (1955). |
Inagaki, H., Precipitation of the β-phase in Al—Mg Alloys, Z. Metallkd., p. 45-53 (2005). |
Nakai et al., Influence of Additional Elements on the Resistance to Stress Corrosion Cracking of Al—Mg Alloys, Science and Engineering of Light Metals, Japan Inst. Light Metals, p. 419-424 (1991). |
Nakayam et al., Precipitation Behaviors of β-phase and Changes in Mechanical Properties of Al—Mg System Alloys, Materials Science Forum, p. 1269-1274 (1996). |
Nozato et al., Calorimetric Study of Precipitation Process in Al—Mg Alloys, Trans. Japan Inst. Metal, p. 580-588 (1980). |
Sheppard, T., Extrusion of Aluminium Alloys, Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 186-191 (1999). |
Speidel et al., Advances in Corrosion Science and Technology, Corrosion Center, Department of Metallurgical Engineering The Ohio State University, vol. 2, p. 210-223 (1972). |
Standard Practice for Evaluating Stress Corrosion Cracking Resistance of Metals and Alloys by Alternate Immersion in 3.5% Sodium Chloride Solution, ASTM G44-88, p. 162-165 (1988). |
Standard Test Method for Determining the Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of 5XXX Series Aluminum Alloys by Mass Loss After Exposure to Nitric Acid (NAMLT Test), ASTM G67-86, p. 247-248 (Jan. 1987). |
Svenningsen et al., Effect of Artificial Aging on Intergranular Corrosion of Extruded AlMgSi Alloy with Small Cu Content, Corrosion Science, p. 1528-1543 (2006). |
Thomas, Philip, Continuous Casting of Aluminium Alloys, Solidification and Casting, Chapter 2, p. 26-47 (2003). |
Vargel, C., Corrosion of Aluminium, Dissolution Potentials of Intermetallic Phases (Solution: NaCl, H2O2, ASTM G69), Elsevier, p. 62-64, 221, 284 (2004). |
Yamaguchi et al., Effect of Zn Addition on Intergranular Corrosion Resistance of Al—Mg—Si Alloys, Proc. ICAA 6, vol. 3, p. 1657-1662 (1998). |
Aluminum Properties and Physical Metallurgy, Edited by John H. Hatch, pp. 260-273 (published 1984). |
Ernest S. Hedges et al.; Tin and Its Alloys; 1960; pp. 282-295; Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd,; Great Britain. |
Taylor Lyman et al.; Heat Treating, Cleaning and Finishing; Metals Handbook; 1964; pp. 277-278; vol. 2, 8th Edition; American Society for Metals; USA. |
I.Jin et al., Centre Line Segragation in Twin Roll Cast Aluminum Alloy Slab; Light Metals 1982; Feb. 14, 1982; pp. 873-888; The Metallurgical Society of AIME; USA. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for Japanese Publication 60-027450; http://www19.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/PA1/result/detail/main/wAAAWpaqE2DA360027450 . . . ; Feb. 12, 1985, 1 page. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for Japanese Publication 61-276751; http://www19.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/PA1/result/detail/main/wAAWpaqE2DA361276751 . . . ; Dec. 6, 1986; 1 page. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for Japanese Publication 62-006742; http://www19.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/PA1/result/main/wAAAWpaqE2DA3620067422 . . . ; Jan. 13, 1987; 1 page. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for Japanese Publication 64-004458; http://www19.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/PA1/result/detail/main/wAAAWpaqE2DA364004458 . . . ; Jan. 9, 1989; 1 page. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for Japanese Publication 01-202344; http://www19.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/PA1/result/detail/main/wAAACGaqhoDA401202344P1.htm; Aug. 15, 1989; 6 pages. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for Japanese Publication 01-242762; http://www19.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/PA1/result/detail/main/wAAAo—aq3fDA401242762P1.htm; Sep. 27, 1989; 1 page. |
J. Masounave et al.; The Design and Implementation of the IMRI Strip Caster; 1988; pp. 473-492; The Metallurgial Society. |
Wojtek Szczypiorski et al.; The Mechanical and Metallurgical Characteristics of Twin-Belt Cast Aluminum Strip Using Current Hazelett Technology; The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society; 1991; pp. 805-814. |
Joseph R. Davis et al.; vol. 4 Heat Treating; ASM Handbook; Aug. 1991; pp. 851-857 and 878-879; ASM International; USA. |
L. Amberg et al.; Aluminum Alloys-Their Physical and Mechanical Properties; Jun. 1992; pp. 20-27; vol. 1; The Norwegian Institute of Technology; Norway. |
Aluminum Standards and Data 1993; Table 3.5—Typical Annealing Treatments for Aluminum Alloy Mill Products; 1993; 2 pages; The Aluminum Association Incorportated. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for Japanese Publication 05-277656; http://www19.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/PA1/result/detail/main/wAAAWpaqE2DA405277656 . . . ; Oct. 26, 1993; 1 page. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for Japanese Publication 06-071303; http://www19.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/PA1/result/detail/main/wAAAySa4DBDA406071303P1 . . . ; Mar. 15, 1994; 1 page. |
Pan Fusheng et al.; The SIC Distribution in the As-Cast Strips of SICP/A356 Aluminum Matrix Composites by the Twin Roll Casting; Acta Materials Composite Sinica; Feb. 1995; 9 pages; vol. 12, No. 1; Chongqing University; China. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for Japanese Publication 07-148557; http://www19.ipdl.inpit.go.jp/PA1/result/detail/main/wAAAWpaqE2DA407148557 . . . ; Jun. 13, 1995; 1 page. |
P.A. Karnezis et al.; Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Twin Roll Cast Al—7Si/SiCp MMCs; Materials Science and Technology; Aug. 1995; pp. 741-751; vol. 11; University of Pittsburgh, PA. |
P.A. Karnezis et al.; Effect of Processing on the Microstructure and Tensile Properties of A356/SiCp MMCs; Materials Science Form vols. 217-222; 1996; pp. 341-346 Transtec Publications; Switzerland. |
SU 1453932 A1, Abstract of Invention for Application No. 4193818/02; Mar. 27, 1996; 1 page. |
P.A. Karnezis et al.; Characterization of Reinforcement Distribution in Cast Al-Alloy/SiCp Composites; Materials Characterizations; Apr. 1997; pp. 97-109; Elsevier Science Inc.; USA. |
J.Z. Zhao; XP-002482794: Strip Casting of Al—Pb Alloys—A Numerical Analysis; Materials Science & Engineering A282; Sep. 20, 1999; pp. 262-269; Elsevier Science S.A.; Germany. |
Toshio Haga et al.; High-Speed Roll Caster for Strip Casting of Aluminm Alloy; Meterials Science Forum; vols. 331-337; 2000; pp. 185-190; Trans Tech Publications; Switzerland. |
E.S. Puchi-Cabrera; Modeling Cold-Rolling Process of Commercial Twin Roll Cast Aluminum Alloys; Sep. 14, 2000; 1 page; Universidad Central de Venezuela; Venzuela. |
D. Tomes et al.; Properties of O, T4 adn T6 Temper Products Manufactured In-Line at Alcoa Micromill; Dec. 12, 2002; 11 pages; Alcoa Inc. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 10/078,638; Mar. 18, 2003; 4 pages; USA. |
D. Tomes et al.; Properties of 6061 Sheet, Heat Treatable In-Line at Alcoa Micromill; Jun. 2, 2003; 8 pages; Alcoa Inc. |
D.A. Tomes et al.; Properties of Alloy Ax-07 in O-Temper Annealed in Line at Alcoa Micromill; Jul. 15, 2003; 23 pages; Alcoa Inc. |
D.A. Tomes et al.; Properties of Heat Treatable 6022 Sheet Made In-Line at Alcoa Micromill; Sep. 18, 2003; 26 pages; Alcoa Inc. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT International Search Report Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US03/18764; Sep. 29, 2003; Europe. |
Ali Unal et al.; Properties of Al—10%Mg Alloy Sheet Made from Alcoa Micromill Strip; Jan. 22, 2004; 45 pages; Alcoa Inc. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 10/461,704; Jun. 18, 2004; 4 pages; USA. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT Written Opinion Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US03/18764; Jul. 1, 2004; 4 pages; Europe. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 10/782,027; Sep. 17, 2004; 11 pages; USA. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT International Preliminary Examinatinon Report Issued in Connection with PCT/US03/18764; Oct. 5, 2004; 3 pages; Europe. |
U.S. Patent Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Againt U.S. Appl. No. 10/461,704; Oct. 28, 2004; 7 pages; USA. |
Ali Unal; Declaration Under 37 C.F.R. 1.132, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/461,704; Jan. 20, 2005; 12 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment Issued in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 10/782,027; Feb. 4, 2005; 2 pages; USA. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Advisory Action Before the Filing of an Appeal Brief, Issued Agaisnt U.S. Appl. No. 10/782,027; Sep. 29, 2005; 8 pages; USA. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US05/04558; Jan. 18, 2006; 6 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; Supplementary European Search Report Issued in Connection with EP 03737080; Feb. 3, 2006; 2 pages; Europe. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 10/782,027; Feb. 21, 2006, 12 pages; USA. |
RU 2284364 C2; Abstract of Invention for Russian Application No. 2004116858/02; Feb. 27, 2006; 1 page. |
European Patent Office; European Office Action Issued Against European Patent Application No. 02706344.5; Sep. 19, 2006; 4 pages; Europe. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan for Japanese Patent Applicaiton No. 63-023717; http://www19.ipdl.ncipi.go.jp/PA1/result/detail/main/wAAACGaqhoDA401202344P1.htm; 2 pages; website printed Oct. 3, 2006. |
Ali Unal et al.; Alcoa Micromill Caster (AMC): Structure and properties of AA5052 Strip Cast at 63 mm tip setback; Nov. 2006, 51 pages; Alcoa Inc. |
European Patent Office; European Office Action Issued Against European Application No. 02706344.5; May 3, 2007; 3 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; European Office Action Issued Against European Application No. 03737080.6; Jun. 26, 2007; 3 pages; Europe. |
Patent Abstracts for Japanese Application No. 63-023717; http://www19.ipdl.ncipi.go.jp/PA1/result/detail/main/wAAACGaqhoDA401202344P1.htm; 2 pages; Website Printed Oct. 3, 2006. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT International Search Report Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US05/28353; Aug. 27, 2007; 2 pages; Europe. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US05/28353; Aug. 27, 2007; 6 pages; Europe. |
Japan Patent Office; Notification of Reason for Refusal Issued Against Japanese Application No. 2002-565730; Nov. 20, 2007; 4 pages; Japan. |
European Patent Office; European Office Action Issued Against European Application No. 02706344.5; Dec. 14, 2007; 2 pages; Europe. |
The Patent Office of the People's Repulic of China; Notification of First Office Action Issued Against Chinese Application No. 2005800109516; Jan. 4, 2008; 5 pages; China. |
XP-002486412; C:/EPOPROGS\SEA\.\.\. \epodata\sea\eplogf\sa799343.log; Jan. 7, 2008; 1 page. |
XP-002486413; C:/EPOPROGS\SEA\.\.\. \epodata\sea\eplogf\sa799343.log; Jan. 7, 2008; 1 page. |
XP-002486414; C:/EPOPROGS\SEA\.\.\. \epodata\sea\eplogf\sa799343.log; Jan. 7, 2008; 1 page. |
XP-002486415; C:/EPOPROGS\SEA\.\.\. \epodata\sea\eplogf\sa799343.log; Jan. 7, 2008; 1 page. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Office Action Issued Against Korean Application No. 2003-7010929; Jan. 14, 2008; 6 pages; Korea (South). |
European Patent Office; Supplementary European Search Report Issued in Connection with European Application No. 05713469; Jan. 17, 2008; 2 pages; Europe. |
Russian Federation Patent Office; Office Action Issued Against Russian Application No. 2006133381/02; Apr. 1, 2008; 5 pages; Russia. |
European Patent Office; European Office Action Issued Against European Application No. 02706344.5; Apr. 2, 2008; 4 pages; Europe. |
The Patent Office of the People's Republic of China; Notification of Second Office Action Issued Against Chinese Application No. 2005800109516; Jun. 20, 2008; 4 pages; China. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT International Search Report Issued in Connection with International Applicaiton No. PCT/US2008/060050; Jul. 4, 2008; 4 pages; Europe. |
Patent Coopertaion Treaty; PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US2008/060050; Jul. 4, 2008; 5 pages; Europe. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT International Search Report Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US2008/060060; Jul. 18, 2008; 5 pages; Europe. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US2008/060060; Jul. 18, 2008; 9 pages; Europe. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 11/549,408; Jul. 24, 2008; 7 pages; USA. |
Canadian Intellectual Property Office; Office Action Issued Against Canadian Application No. 2,557,417; Aug. 14, 2008; 4 pages; Canada. |
Japan Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Refusal Issued Against Japanese Application No. 2006-554150; Oct. 28, 2008; 8 pages; Japan. |
Japan Patent Office; Notice of Reasons for Refusal Issued Against Japanese Application No. 2004-530797; Dec. 2, 2008; 4 pages; Japan. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notice of Grounds for Refusal Issued Against Korean Application No. 10-2006-7017913; Dec. 13, 2008; 4 pages; Korea (South). |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,113; Jan. 13, 2009; 7 pages; USA. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notice of Final Rejection Issued Against Korean Application No. 10-2006-7017913; Jan. 29, 2009; 3 pages; Korea (South). |
Australian Government, IP Australia; Examiner's First Report Issued Against Australian Application No. 2005214348; Apr. 1, 2009; 2 pages; Australia. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,121; Apr. 28, 2009; 7 pages; USA. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notice of Result of Reexamination Issued in Connection with Korean Application No. 10-2006-7017913; Jun. 24, 2009; 4 pages; Korea (South). |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,121; Jul. 9, 2009; 8 pages; USA. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,113; Sep. 21, 2009; 8 pages; USA. |
European Patent Office; European Office Action Issued in Connection with European Application No. 03737080.6; Sep. 25, 2009; 3 pages; Europe. |
Intellectual Property Tribunal of Korea; Transmittal Certified Copy of Decision on Trial Issued in Connection with Korean Application No. 2006-7017913; Nov. 4, 2009; 10 pages; Korea (South). |
Ali Unal; Declaration Uner 37 C.F.R. § 1.132 of Ali Unal, Field in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,113; Dec. 21, 2009; 3 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,121; Dec. 23, 2009; 10 pages; USA. |
U.S. Patent and Tradmark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,113; Feb. 18, 2010; 11 pages; USA. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT International Search Report Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US2009/060887; Feb. 26, 2010; 4 pages; Europe. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority Issued in Connection with International Application No. PCT/US2009/060887; Feb. 26, 2010; 7 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; European Office Action Issued in Connection with European Application No. 03737080.6; Mar. 9, 2010; 2 pages; Europe. |
European Patent Office; European Office Action Issued in Connection with European Application No. 03737080.6; Mar. 22, 2010; 2 pages; Europe. |
Russian Federation; Russian Office Action Issued in Connection with Russian Application No. 2009141598/02; Mar. 28, 2010; 10 pages; Russia. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notice of Grounds for Refusal Issued Against Korean Application No. 10-2005-7002906; Apr. 23, 2010; 6 pages; Korea (South). |
State Intellectual Property of the People's Republic of China; Notification of the Third Office Action Issued Against Chinese Application No. 200580010951.6; May 19, 2010; 4 pages; China. |
Australian Government, IP Australia; Australian Office Action Issued Against Australian Application No. 2008240265; Jun. 17, 2010; 3 pages; Australia. |
Ali Unal, Declaration Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.132 of Ali Unal, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,113; Jun. 28, 2010; 7 pages. |
European Patent Office; European Office Action Issued Against European Application No. 08799790.4; Jun. 29, 2010; 5 pages; Europe. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,113; Aug. 5, 2010; 15 pages; USA. |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; Office Action Issued Against Chinese Application for Utility Model No. 200920291302.3; Sep. 29, 2010; 3 pages; China. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Korean Notification of Final Rejection Issued Against Korean Application No. 10-205-7002906; Oct. 27, 2010; 3 pages; Korea (South). |
Russian Federation; Russian Office Action Issued in Connection with Russian Application No. 2009141589/02; Jan. 12, 2011; 6 page; Russia. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notification of Grounds for Refusal Issued Against Korean Application No. 10-2009-7011352; Jan. 16, 2011; 8 pages; Korea (South). |
European Patent Office; European Office Action Issued in Connection with European Application No. 08799790.4; Feb. 4, 2011; 5 pages; Europe. |
Ali Unal; Declarations Under 37 C.F.R. § 1.132 of Ali Unal, Filed in Connection with U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,113; Feb. 4, 2011; 3 pages. |
Ali Unal; Declaration of Ali Unal Filed in Connection with Korean Application No. 10-2005-7002906; Feb. 21, 2011; 6 pages. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,113; Mar. 28, 2011; 12 pages; USA. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty; PCT International Perliminary Report on Patentability Issued in Connection with International Applicaiton No. PCT/US2009/059820; Apr. 12, 2011; 9 pages; Europe. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Agsint U.S. Appl. No. 12/246,937; Apr. 29, 2011; 7 pages; USA. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notification of Grounds for Refusal Issued Against Korean Applicaiton No. 10-2011-7004617; May 11, 2011; 3 pages; Korea (South). |
State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China; Notification of the First Office Action Issued Against Chinese Application No. 200880018281.6; May 25, 2011; 4 pages; China. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,999; Jul. 29, 2011; 11 pages; USA. |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 12/913,972; Aug. 10, 2011; 10 pages; USA. |
Russian Federation Patent Office; Formal Official Action Issued Against Russian Application No. 2011122789/20; Aug. 30, 2011; 4 pages; Russia. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office; Notification of Grounds for Refusal Issued Against Korean Application No. 10-2005-7002906; Oct. 18, 2011; 5 pages; Korea (South). |
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; Office Action Issued Against U.S. Appl. No. 11/734,113; Nov. 2, 2011; 12 pages; USA. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100119407 A1 | May 2010 | US |