The invention generally relates to bimetallic tubular components and, more particularly, the invention relates to producing corrosion resistant bimetallic tubular components using a two-step metal forming process.
Considerable cost savings can be attained by the use of clad and lined materials compared to solid Corrosion Resistant Alloy (CRA) materials. This is particularly evident with larger outside diameters CRA tubulars which are necessary to satisfy flow rate requirements and evident with heavier wall thicknesses which are required for strength and pressure requirements for specific downhole applications. CRA tubulars provide the corrosion resistance needed when gas drilling and completion operations involve severe downhole conditions where CO2 and H2S are present. These alloys are utilized when the traditional stainless steels do not provide adequate corrosion resistance. Over the last ten years, CRA tubulars, made out of nickel-based alloys like 825, G3, G50, C276 and 625 have met the material requirements for these wells, but the cost of these tubulars is exorbitant. Recent advances in technology have facilitated the development of a clad tubulars for downhole use composed of an API C90 and T95 outer tube and a CRA corrosion resistant liner. The carbon alloy, C90 or T95 outer tube, provides the structural integrity of the tubular while the CRA liner provides the necessary corrosion resistance. C90 and T95 are AISI 4130 type steel that is quenched (water) and tempered and is suitable for sour service environments per the guidelines in NACE MR0175-2000. CRA's are defined as those alloys whose mass-loss corrosion rate in produced fluids is at least an order of magnitude less than carbon steel, thus providing an alternative method to using inhibition for corrosion control. Table 1 shows the composition of various nickel-based CRA grades that are utilized for maximum corrosion resistance in aqueous H2S and CO2 environments. The mode of cracking in nickel-based alloys is occasionally intergranular.
When CO2 is present in the flow stream, additional corrosion considerations are necessary. The presence of CO2 can considerably increase the weight loss corrosion of carbon and alloy steel tubing. The corrosion rate is a function of the temperature, CO2 concentration and the partial pressure. Since regulatory and environmental guidelines usually prohibit the allowance for predictable weight loss corrosion (e.g., increasing the wall thickness to compensate for corrosion through the wall of the pipe), the selection of alternate stainless steel and CRA materials are made. When H2S is present, the corrosion problem switches from a weight loss issue (e.g., pitting and crevice corrosion) to a sulfide stress cracking (SSC) phenomena. Hydrogen sulfide stress cracking (SSC) is defined as the spontaneous fracturing of steel that is simultaneously subjected to an aqueous corrosive hydrogen sulfide medium and a static stress less than the tensile strength of the material. It usually occurs in a brittle manner, resulting in catastrophic failures at stresses less than the yield strength of the material. Hydrogen SSC is basically a hydrogen embrittlement mechanism resulting from the formation of hydrogen ions (H+) in the presence of aqueous hydrogen sulfide (H2S). Over the last five years, there has been an increasing need for downhole tubing suitable for severe CO2 and H2S environments. Numerous nickel-based alloys have well established corrosion resistant attributes for these production applications but are extremely costly when utilized as a solid wall tubular. The exorbitant cost of solid wall CRA tubulars has resulted in many projects being deemed too costly or postponed and therefore have not been pursued.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a method of producing a bimetallic tubular component includes providing a first tubular workpiece having an inner diameter and a second tubular workpiece having an outer diameter. The first and second tubular workpieces have dissimilar cold-working processing parameters. The method further includes diffusion bonding the inner diameter of the first tubular workpiece to the outer diameter of the second tubular workpiece, and flowforming the diffusion bonded tubular workpieces to form the bimetallic tubular component. Alternatively, hot extruding, explosive cladding, laser deposition cladding, rolling and/or fuse welding may be used instead of, or in addition to, diffusion bonding.
In some embodiments, the cold-working processing parameters include feed rates, speed rates, and/or wall reduction percentages. The diffusion bonding may be a hot isostatic pressing process. The hot isostatic pressing process may be performed in an inert atmosphere. Each tubular workpiece may have an end and a gap may be formed between the inner diameter and the other diameter. The method may further include providing a port that goes through the first tubular workpiece to the gap between the two workpieces, sealing the end of the first tubular workpiece to the end of the second tubular workpiece in order to form a sealed area between the two workpieces, and forming a vacuum between the two workpieces in the gap before the diffusion bonding process. The second tubular workpiece may have a hardness value greater than about two times the hardness value of the first tubular workpiece before the flowforming process.
The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Various embodiments of the present invention provide a two-step process, diffusion bonding (DB) and cold flowforming, that has been developed for manufacturing bimetallic pipes and tubes. With this new process, dissimilar metals having a large difference in their cold deformation resistances can be metallurgically bonded into one preform hollow and flowformed into long lengths, creating a clad or bimetallic long tube/pipe. It is important to join the two metals metallurgically in the preform state by DB which can be done during a hot isostatic pressing (HIP) process. DB is a solid-state joining process wherein joining is accomplished without the need for a liquid interface (brazing) or the creation of a cast product via melting and resolidification (welding). After the preform DB process has been done, step two is to flowform the clad preform into a clad flowformed tube/pipe. The two-step process may be used for the manufacture of corrosion resistant pipes for oil country tubular goods (OCTG) for sour service. In one embodiment, the inner and outer materials of the pipe may be a nickel-based superalloy (alloy 625) and sulfide stress cracking (SSC) resistant low alloy steel (1018 steel), respectively, although other dissimilar metals may also be used. A bimetallic pipe with uniform thickness of both outer and inner metals may be obtained by the new process. The corrosion resistance of the two layers of metals as well as the strength of the outer material exhibits satisfactory performance to comply with the requirements for OCTG use. Embodiments of the two-step process, DB and cold flowform process, are promising for producing bimetallic tubes/pipes from two materials that have much different cold strain rates (cold workability). Therefore, a CRA clad lined tubular may be produced according to embodiments of the present invention that provides the necessary corrosion protection, structural integrity and also offers considerable cost savings over solid wall CRA tubulars. With the increasing need worldwide for more gas to satisfy world demand, embodiments of the present invention will provide the economic incentive to explore and produce oil and gas in regions that were previously uneconomical. Details of illustrative embodiments are discussed below.
Clad Lined Pipe Product Development:
Over the last twenty years, there have been several manufacturing methods developed for producing CRA clad/lined tubulars. The American Petroleum Institute (API) has also developed a specification for the CRA clad and lined line pipe (API 5LD, 3rd edition 2009). Clad and lined tubulars have gained relatively wide acceptance for use in transporting petroleum products, for refinery applications and for downhole oil and gas operations. Clad or lined CRA tubulars are classified in two basic categories: mechanically lined and metallurgically bonded.
Mechanically lined tubulars are the simplest and most economic method of producing clad pipe. This method of manufacture does not create a metallurgical bond between the outer pipe used for structural integrity, and the inner liner pipe that is selected for the appropriate corrosion resistance properties. Mechanically lined CRA pipe has gained wide market acceptance. This method of manufacture provides better quality control features compared to metallurgically bonded pipe because each of the pipe components (outer pipe and liner) can be independently inspected utilizing traditional inspection techniques. The lack of a metallurgical bond at the interface of the outer pipe and inner liner eliminates the difficulties associated with ultrasonic flaw inspection of the piping components. For applications where bending is critical for the serviceability, this method of manufacture is unsuitable due to buckling of the liner. Gas migration between the material layers is a concern for corrosion.
Metallurgically bonded tubulars are those in which there is a metallurgical bond between the structural outer pipe and the corrosion resistant inner pipe. There are several manufacturing techniques currently employed to produce these products and are described below. The metallurgically bonded tubular tends to be more costly than those that are mechanically lined. Longitudinally welded pipe is produced today from clad plate produced by hot roll formed or explosively bonded plate. Although length restrictions exist with these two methods of manufacture, it is common to girth weld two lengths together to fabricate a longer length tube, despite girth welds being costly and unpopular.
Clad Plate Forming: Clad plates can be produced by three common methods; hot roll bonding, explosive bonding and weld overlay. Clad plates have been used extensively for many processing vessels, separators, heat exchangers and plates. Hot, roll bonding accounts for more than 90% of the clad plate production, worldwide (˜55,000 tons/year). Once the clad plate is produced, it is formed into a tubular shell and longitudinally welded full length. There is always a concern for a failure at the weld.
Extrusion Method: This production method involves taking a combination billet of carbon steel and CRA material and hot extruding the hollow to longer lengths. A thick-walled carbon steel tubular is machined to very tight tolerances and then a CRA tubular is inserted into the bore. Often the two materials are heat shrunk together to achieve a tight mechanical fit. The ends of the combination billet are commonly seal welded prior to extruding to prevent the intrusion of air, oxygen and other contaminants into the interface. This heavy wall tubular billet is then extruded at temperatures in excess of 1260° C. (2300° F.) which results in a metallurgical bond between the carbon steel outer pipe and the CRA material on the inner diameter surface. The final length of the clad extrusion is limited by the capacity (capable forces to hot work the tubular) of the extrusion press. Metallurgically bonded extruded pipe has had some limited use for the bends of transmission, gathering and flow lines as this method of manufacture is more costly than the mechanically lined CRA tubulars which have found significant application for the straight portions of these oil/gas transportation systems. Extruding mild steel at 2300° F. can cause deleterious grain growth.
Traditionally, there exists restriction on the combination of two materials that can be extruded together. The difference between the hot deformation resistances of two materials should not be very large or the two materials will deform separately (shear apart during extruding) because of the large delta in strain rates at a given temperature. Alloy C-276 (UNS NI0276) and alloy 625 (UNS N06625) are the most common CRAs for sour service. Because of their high contents of molybdenum, these alloys exhibit much larger high temperature deformation resistances than carbon and low alloy steels.
Cold Forming: Often cold working tubes are preferred to hot extruding tubes because of the better control in dimensional accuracies, superior surface finishes achieved, and the ability to increase the materials' strength thru varying the amounts of wall reduction (cold work). In the case of 1018 or 1020 steel, the annealed hardness is ˜100 Vickers and the hardness increases to ˜160 Vickers after about 75% wall reduction with cold working. See, e.g.,
CRA Pipe Manufactured by a Two-Step Process; Diffusion Bonding a Preform Hollow and Cold Flowforming:
Embodiments of the present invention discovered that two metals having very different hardness levels, which have very different cold deformation rates and/or which cold work at very different strength levels, may be simultaneously cold worked via flowforming if both metals are metallurgically joined before the cold working process. Among the various technologies for joining two metals include diffusion bonding thru the Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) technology. For example, an inner and outer tube can loosely be assembled together (e.g., about 0.020″ gap or less between the two tubes) and subsequently DB or HIP into a bimetallic, metallurgically bonded hollow preform. In lieu of two solid tubes being DB together, powder metal may also be DB or HIPed to the other tube to form the bimetallic hollow preform. For example, the interface between a low alloy steel substrate and an alloy 625 liner, joined by HIP, exhibits a high joint strength up to about 930 MPa. Accordingly to ASTM 264 for Stainless Chromium-Nickel Steel-Clad Plate, section 7.2.1 Shear Strength, the minimum shear strength of the alloy cladding and base metal shall be 20,000 psi (˜140 MPa).
Step 1, Diffusion Bonding the Preform:
In one embodiment, the bimetallic hollow preform (e.g., steel on the OD and CRA on the ID) is created by joining the two dissimilar metals metallurgically by diffusion bonding (DB). As mentioned above, DB is a solid-state joining processes wherein joining is accomplished without the need for a liquid interface (brazing) or the creation of a cast product via melting and resolidification (welding). DB is a process that produces solid-state coalescence between two materials under conditions where the joining occurs at a temperature below the melting point, Tm, of the materials to be joined (usually >1/2 Tm). Coalescence of contacting surfaces is produced with loads below those that would cause macroscopic deformation to the part. In some embodiments, a bonding aid may be used, such as an interface foil or coating, to either facilitate bonding or prevent the creation of brittle phases between the dissimilar materials. Preferably, the material should not produce a low-temperature liquid eutectic upon reaction with the material(s) to be joined. Thus, diffusion bonding facilitates the joining of materials to produce components with no abrupt discontinuity in the microstructure and with a minimum of deformation. Usually, the DB process is limited to either press or gas pressure or bonding approaches.
Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) is a common method of achieving DB. Special techniques are employed to eliminate detrimental hardening and the formation of oxides at the bonding interface due to the precipitation of intermetallic phases or carbides. HlPing in a vacuum can help prevent the formation of these oxides and intermetallic phases. When HIP is performed in an inert atmosphere, a vacuum can be created in the annulus between both materials by evacuating the air before (or during) the DB process. Welding close the gaps on both ends of the inner and outer layers creates a sealed pressure vessel.
Step 2, Flowforming:
Flowforming is a chipless, metal forming technology used to fabricate cylindrical tubular components and pipes though controlled wall reduction by cold working. Often flowform products are seamless and very precise. Flowforming offers a net-shape manufacturing approach, requiring less material to make components and often substantially reducing the costs associated with secondary manufacturing operations such as machining, straightening, honing and grinding. Seamless components with high length to diameter ratios, e.g., up to about 50 to 1, realize the greatest cost savings through the flowforming manufacturing process. Wall thicknesses as thin as about 0.010″ can be flowformed irrespective of the diameter of the tube. The flowforming process may be used to produce monolithic pipes and tubulars made out of various metals and metal alloys, such as stainless steel, zirconium, titanium, cobalt and nickel alloys (e.g., CRAs).
The flowforming process uses hydraulic forces to drive three CNC-controlled rollers to the outside diameter of a cylindrical preform which is fitted over a rotating, inner mandrel. The rollers compress against the preform wall thickness and plastically deform the preform wall. The desired geometry is achieved when the preform is compressed above its yield strength and plastically deformed or “made to flow”. As the preform's wall thickness is reduced by the process, the length of the preform is increased as it is formed over the inner, rotating mandrel. This wall reduction with a cold work process causes the material's mechanical properties to increase, while refining the microstructure and orienting the crystallographic texture. Dimensional accuracies, specifically roundness, wall concentricity and straightness are normally achieved well beyond what can be realized through hot forming processes such as extruding or roll and welding of tubes and pipes. During flowforming, it is typical to reduce the preform wall thickness at least by about 20%, and in many instances the preform wall thickness is reduced by as much as 75%, in one or more (e.g., two or three) consecutive flowform passes. For example,
Forming High Strength Clad Pipe with an Outer Jacket Alloy without Heat Treatment
In many situations, high strength clad pipe may be necessary or desirable. For example, where the clad pipe is to be used in pipeline transportation systems or used for drilling applications in the petroleum and natural gas industries, the clad pipe typically needs to meet certain strength standards, e.g., such as those set out in the American Petroleum Institute's API Specification 5LD “Specifications For CRA Clad Or Lined Steel Pipe”.
However, where the clad pipe is formed by overlaying an inner CRA with an outer jacket formed from low alloy steel, heat treatment is typically needed in order to give the low alloy steel its desired strength. Therefore, a heat treatment operation is performed on the clad pipe after flowforming when the clad pipe is formed by flowforming. Unfortunately, this heat treatment operation, which typically includes a quench and temper operation, may have significant negative effects on the flowformed pipe, e.g.,
(i) the heat treatment can distort the pipe dimensionally;
(ii) the heat treatment can soften or anneal the CRA which forms the inner core of the clad pipe; and
(iii) the heat treatment can add significantly to the cost of the clad pipe.
According to embodiments of the present invention, the clad pipe may be formed by overlaying the inner core CRA with an outer jacket alloy which does not require heat treatment after flowforming. Thus, the clad pipe may be formed from two cold workable alloys (e.g., the inner core CRA and the outer jacket alloy) which do not require heat treatment after flowforming. The clad pipe is used in its cold worked condition.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the outer jacket alloy includes inexpensive stainless steel, duplex stainless steel, and/or an aluminum alloy, etc. The outer jacket alloy may be selected so that the cold working associated with flowforming acts to increase the strength of the material. For example, the outer jacket alloy may include a material shown in Table 2 below.
(A)Cr + 3.3 (Mo = 0.5 W) = 16N (wt %).
(B)Cast product with 25% to 40% ferrite.
The inner CRA may be selected so that the cold working associated with flowforming acts to increase the strength of the material. For example, the inner core CRA may include a material shown in Table 3 below.
Therefore, the negative effects associated with a post-flowforming heat treatment may be eliminated by replacing the low alloy steel jacket with an alloy jacket which does not require heat treatment to provide the desired strength where a high strength clad pipe formed by flowforming is necessary or desirable. Preferably, this may be done by forming the outer jacket out of inexpensive stainless steel, duplex stainless steel, and/or an aluminum alloy. In this case, the clad pipe is flowformed and there is no subsequent heat treatment. The clad pipe is used in the cold worked condition. Preferably, the outer jacket is formed out of an alloy which has its strength increased by the cold working associated with flowforming, e.g., such as one of the materials shown in Table 2 above. Preferably, the inner CRA is also selected from a material which has its strength increased by the cold working associated with flowforming, e.g., such as one of the materials shown in Table 3 above.
Bonding the Clad Preform
As noted above, the clad pipe may be formed by generating a clad preform having an inner core (e.g., CRA) covered by an outer jacket (e.g., an alloy) and then metallurgically joining the two metals before the cold working process of flowforming. In one embodiment, this metallurgical joining of the two metals is achieved by diffusion bonding. The metallurgical joining of the two metals may also be achieved by:
(i) bonding bimetallic sheet through explosive bonding, then rolling and welding so as to form the hollow preform, then flowforming; or
(ii) hot extruding the bimetallic hollow preform so as to create a metallurgical bond in the hollow preform, then flowforming.
It is generally not practical to use explosive bonding or extrusion bonding over the large lengths commonly associated with pipeline sections (e.g., 40 feet). However, it is practical to use explosive bonding or extrusion bonding over the shorter lengths commonly associated with the hollow preforms used for flowforming (e.g., 8 feet), so these other methods for metallurgical joining the two metals become practical when used in conjunction with flowforming.
Embodiments of the present invention include a new, two-step manufacturing process, diffusion bonding and flowforming, for producing bimetallic pipes and tubes made of two dissimilar metals or alloys. For example, a CRA liner material may be used on the bore with the OD material made of steel. The two materials may have dissimilar hardness and/or strain hardening levels that typically require two different processing parameters to cold work the materials. It was surprisingly found that the two materials, once diffusion bonded together, were able to be flowformed with one set of processing parameters. The two materials did not shear or rip apart from one another during the flowforming process. It is believed that one material provides support for the softer, more ductile material, allowing both materials to be flowformed together to produce a clad, cold-worked tube. For example, a liner material made of alloy 625 and a substrate OD material made of sour gas resistant low alloy steel (e.g., 1018 steel) may be diffusion bonded and flowformed into longer pipe using embodiments of the present invention. The preform material is metallurgically bonded together thru the diffusion bonding process which removes or reduces oxides from the bonding surface. Uniform or varying wall thicknesses can be flowformed for both layers. The flowformed, bimetallic pipe, formed according to embodiments of the present invention, provides excellent corrosion resistance. For example, the alloy 625 layer exhibited corrosion resistance which was almost identical with that of commercial solid alloy 625 pipe. The SSC resistance of a low alloy steel substrate satisfies the requirements of OCTG steel for sour service.
Although the above description describes flowforming for step two, other cold working, metal forming processes may be used instead of flowforming. For example, “drawing over a mandrel” and/or pilgering may also be used. Additionally, the bimetallic pipe can be made up of a myriad of combinations of materials, e.g., aluminum, titanium, zirconium, various nickel alloys, 300 series stainless, Nitronic, duplex stainless, non-magnetic stainless on the ID liners with clad low carbon steel, high carbon steel, or stainless ODs, or any combination thereof.
In addition, although the above description describes diffusion bonding for step one, other metal forming processes that adhere two materials together may be used instead of, or in addition to, the diffusion bonding. For example, hot extruding, cladding, rolling and fuse welding (without a weld filler) may be used to metallurgically combine the two materials together before the flowforming step. For instance, two plates may be rolled together and welded to form a tubular component and then cladded together to metallurgically bond the two materials together before the flowforming step. For the cladding process, the materials may be explosively cladded, laser deposition cladded, or diffusion bonding cladded. In this way, vastly different materials that typically have vastly different processing parameters may be formed into one, monolithic, clad workpiece with one set of processing parameters using embodiments of the present invention.
Although the above discussion discloses various exemplary embodiments of the invention, it should be apparent that those skilled in the art can make various modifications that will achieve some of the advantages of the invention without departing from the true scope of the invention.
The present application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/735,987 filed Dec. 11, 2012 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/819,952 filed May 6, 2013, the disclosures of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
627289 | Bennett | Jun 1899 | A |
1346188 | Fahrenwald | Jul 1920 | A |
1365987 | Hadfield et al. | Jan 1921 | A |
1384718 | Guy | Jul 1921 | A |
1553825 | Lansenberg | Sep 1925 | A |
1602282 | Methlin | Oct 1926 | A |
2104319 | Dicke | Jan 1938 | A |
2222579 | Wolcott | Nov 1940 | A |
2392797 | Hackett | Jan 1946 | A |
2541114 | Somes | Feb 1951 | A |
2541116 | Somes | Feb 1951 | A |
2876095 | Dickerson | Mar 1959 | A |
2990342 | Sullivan | Jun 1961 | A |
3017793 | Appel | Jan 1962 | A |
3091022 | Faulkner | May 1963 | A |
3516326 | Donner | Jul 1970 | A |
3568723 | Sowards | Mar 1971 | A |
3571962 | Eig | Mar 1971 | A |
3604102 | Boccalari et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3626570 | Kushnir et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3660177 | Brown et al. | May 1972 | A |
3753286 | Lilly et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
3780555 | Balthazar et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3798011 | Sharp, Jr. | Mar 1974 | A |
3962767 | Byerley et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3969155 | McKeighen | Jul 1976 | A |
4028785 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4161112 | Stump | Jul 1979 | A |
4200492 | Armijo et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4210600 | Zardi | Jul 1980 | A |
4317271 | Chakravarti | Mar 1982 | A |
4319121 | Yoshida | Mar 1982 | A |
4359352 | Ray et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4409881 | van der Wielen | Oct 1983 | A |
4411569 | Pizzola | Oct 1983 | A |
4417459 | Tomita | Nov 1983 | A |
4465524 | Dearnaley et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4478787 | Nadkami et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4482398 | Eylon et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4518111 | Hardwick | May 1985 | A |
4571969 | Tomita | Feb 1986 | A |
4573629 | Imahashi et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4609524 | Ferrari | Sep 1986 | A |
4622080 | Wegwerth | Nov 1986 | A |
4638712 | Chawla et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4669212 | Jackson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4690716 | Sabol et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4747225 | Gstettner et al. | May 1988 | A |
4751044 | Hwang et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4756677 | Hribernik et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4761346 | Naik | Aug 1988 | A |
4765174 | Cook et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4819471 | Cook | Apr 1989 | A |
4846392 | Hinshaw | Jul 1989 | A |
4854148 | Mayer | Aug 1989 | A |
4889776 | Priceman | Dec 1989 | A |
4899813 | Menicatti et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4903887 | Thrower | Feb 1990 | A |
4911060 | Greenspan et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4995548 | Wang et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5004529 | Vishnitsky | Apr 1991 | A |
5056209 | Ohashi et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5111990 | Thrower et al. | May 1992 | A |
5154780 | Premkumar | Oct 1992 | A |
5160802 | Moscri | Nov 1992 | A |
5228427 | Gardner, Jr. | Jul 1993 | A |
5259547 | Hardwick | Nov 1993 | A |
5261591 | Hardwick | Nov 1993 | A |
5285485 | Rosenbaum | Feb 1994 | A |
5341719 | Bullis et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344508 | Gilman et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5383228 | Armijo et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5419791 | Folmer | May 1995 | A |
5434897 | Davies | Jul 1995 | A |
5469481 | Adamson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470373 | Edelstein et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5483563 | Herb | Jan 1996 | A |
5517540 | Marlowe | May 1996 | A |
5524032 | Adamson | Jun 1996 | A |
5558150 | Sponseller | Sep 1996 | A |
5579988 | Schutz | Dec 1996 | A |
5584428 | Satoh | Dec 1996 | A |
5620536 | Dahlbäck | Apr 1997 | A |
5649440 | Arnautu et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657659 | Yamada | Aug 1997 | A |
5699955 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5856631 | Julien | Jan 1999 | A |
5928799 | Sherman et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935351 | Sherman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6010669 | Miola et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6038901 | Stein et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6068814 | Kang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6129795 | Lehockey et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6167794 | Kathe | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6298764 | Sherman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318738 | Abkowitz et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324831 | Izadi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6350327 | Neill | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6363867 | Tsilevich | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386010 | Irie et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6412684 | Miola | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419768 | Tverberg | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6422010 | Julien | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6464804 | Goecmen et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6523385 | Häusler | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6564689 | Billgren | May 2003 | B1 |
6594936 | Sniezak et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615702 | Julien | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6691397 | Chakravarti | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6810615 | Hermanson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6880220 | Gandy | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6887356 | Ford et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6908516 | Hehmann et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6913791 | Burca et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6923900 | Jones et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931776 | Wagner et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7093340 | Groll | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7114358 | Lamb | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7448243 | Motsenbocker | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7482065 | Branagan | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7520947 | Kennedy et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7596848 | Urech et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7601232 | Fonte et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7721478 | Withers et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7765846 | Stueckrad et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7818986 | Parker et al. | Oct 2010 | B1 |
7921590 | Briggs et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7922065 | Sutherlin | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934332 | Briggs | May 2011 | B2 |
7963202 | Becker et al. | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8075839 | Srivastava | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8302341 | Fonte | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8388890 | Hilty et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8418392 | Carter et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8479549 | Fonte | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8618434 | Chen et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8671609 | Fonte | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8681923 | Ashida | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8869443 | Fonte | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8910409 | Fonte | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8973810 | Sutherlin et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9186726 | Keane et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9375771 | Fonte et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
20020121119 | Baensch et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030019269 | Rolf | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040105999 | Abkowitz et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050066801 | Hermanson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076975 | Lopez et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050194073 | Hamano et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050279630 | Fonte | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060027628 | Sutherlin | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060288854 | Witherell et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070059460 | Abney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080063387 | Nakamura et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080142268 | Downton et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080280691 | Stueckrad et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090217812 | Whitaker et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100236122 | Fonte | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120031516 | Yori, III | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20130206274 | Smith et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140087210 | Keane | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140353291 | Gould | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150048057 | Wada | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150083284 | Rawson et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150144681 | Sutherlin et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20160033059 | Fonte | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2224586 | Jan 1997 | CA |
101061248 | Oct 2007 | CN |
102330850 | Jan 2012 | CN |
0057867 | Jan 1982 | EP |
0233437 | Aug 1987 | EP |
0614712 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0911106 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0965410 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1164180 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1577631 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1577632 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1431998 | Mar 1966 | FR |
974590 | Nov 1964 | GB |
1168265 | Oct 1969 | GB |
1220796 | Jan 1971 | GB |
1235182 | Jun 1971 | GB |
1478962 | Jul 1977 | GB |
2256910 | Dec 1992 | GB |
S54-46163 | Apr 1979 | JP |
S54-149012 | Nov 1979 | JP |
S55-152301 | Nov 1980 | JP |
S56-68657 | Jun 1981 | JP |
S56-148486 | Nov 1981 | JP |
S59-39414 | Mar 1984 | JP |
S59-185724 | Oct 1984 | JP |
60-030588 | Feb 1985 | JP |
60-238492 | Nov 1985 | JP |
S62-220212 | Sep 1987 | JP |
S62-224420 | Oct 1987 | JP |
S63-49082 | Apr 1988 | JP |
S63-286288 | Nov 1988 | JP |
S64-2787 | Jan 1989 | JP |
S64-71582 | Mar 1989 | JP |
1-130822 | May 1989 | JP |
H01-152400 | Jun 1989 | JP |
H2-134485 | May 1990 | JP |
H2-179314 | Jul 1990 | JP |
H2-228468 | Sep 1990 | JP |
H2-247302 | Oct 1990 | JP |
H03-36205 | Feb 1991 | JP |
H4-182023 | Jun 1992 | JP |
H5-185248 | Jul 1993 | JP |
H6-10919 | Jan 1994 | JP |
H6-27027 | Apr 1994 | JP |
H6-55076 | Jul 1994 | JP |
H7-9167 | Jan 1995 | JP |
H7-27884 | Jan 1995 | JP |
H07-32167 | Feb 1995 | JP |
H09-168878 | Jun 1997 | JP |
H10-231267 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H11-180942 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-126881 | May 2000 | JP |
2003-1427 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2004-243354 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2007-217716 | Aug 2007 | JP |
2009-30095 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2011-045923 | Mar 2011 | JP |
10-2009-0052233 | May 2009 | KR |
6412699 | Oct 1965 | NE |
WO 9401600 | Jan 1994 | WO |
WO 9701057 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 02099352 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03095060 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004061159 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2010073476 | Jul 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Evaluation of Alloy 625 Steel Bimetallic Pipe for Petroleum Service; by Dr. Wilhelm et al.; The Minderals, Metals & MAterials Society, 1991; p. 771-791. |
“Fabrication of copper/aluminum composite tubes by spin-bonding process: experiments and modeling” by Mohammad Sadegh Mohebbi & Abbas Akbarzadeh; INT J Adv Manuf Technol (2011) published online Nov. 11, 2010. |
AISI 1020 Steel, cold rolled date sheet, published by (http://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet_print.aspx?matguid=10b74ebc27344380ab16b1b69f1cffbb). |
Steels, General Properties data sheet, published by (http://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet_print.aspx?matguid=10e1c14130cd4ed6ae64b85723be53af). |
Haynes 625 alloy published by (http://www.haynesintl.com/alloys/alloy-portfolio_/High-temperature-Alloys/HAYNES625Alloy.aspx). |
Alloy 625 Data Sheet. |
Capital Steel & Wire published to (https://www.capitalsteel.net/news/blog/1018-vs-1020-steel-comparison). |
416R Gun Barrel Steel by Next Generation Metals Inc. published to (http://nextgenerationmetals.com/products-page/stainless/416r-gun-barrel-steel/). |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, Pub. No. 05-093249, related to App. No. JP 03-022791, published Apr. 16, 1993. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, Pub. No. 05-093238, related to App. No. 03-273308, published Apr. 16, 1993. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, Pub. No. 58-179592, related to App. No. 57-054316, published Oct. 20, 1983. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, Pub. No. 60-089565, related to App. No. 58-197406, published May 20, 1985. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, Pub. No. 61-291958, related to App. No. 60-131435, published Dec. 22, 1986. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, Pub. No. 07-150556, related to App. No. 05-300081, published Jun. 13, 1995. |
“Modernising Urea Plants: The Widening Appeal of Revamps”, Fertilizer International, No. 339, Nov. 1994, pp. 28-33. |
Bhowmik, “Materials of Construction in Urea Plant and the Areas where Maximum Corrosion Takes Place”, Corrosion & Maintenance, Jan.-Mar. 1985, pp. 11-22. |
McDowell, Jr., “Corrosion in Urea-Synthesis Reactors”, Chemicals and Processes Pub. May 13, 1974, pp. 54-57. |
Outlook, vol. 7, No. 1, Winter 1986, published by Teledyne Wah Chang Albany, 6 pages. |
Holmes et al., “Welding Zirconium to Titanium” in Outlook, vol. 24, No. 3, Third Quarter 2003, published ATI Wah Chang. |
Outlook, “Explosive welding: principles and potentials” and “Key Welding Processes and Parameters for Zirconium and Other Reactive Metals”, “Q&A: Working With Ti-45Nb”, vol. 15, No. 2, 2nd Quarter 1994, published by Teledyne Wah Chang. |
Condliff, “The Production of Zirconium-Lined Titanium—3%Al-2.5%V Pipe and Tube for Industrial Applications”, Proceedings of Sixth World Conference on Titanium, France, 1988, pp. 1379-1384. |
Tersmeden, “Bimetallic tubing as an answer to process tubing corrosion”, Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials (vol. 44, No. 4, 1997), pp. 269-270. |
“Experimental Investigation of the Vapour-Liquid Equilibrium of the Carbon Dioxide-Ammonia-Water System at Urea Synthesis Conditions”, Chimia, 33, No. 8, Aug. 1979, pp. 293-299. |
Yau, Te-Lin, “Performance of Zirconium and Zirconium Alloys in Organics”, J. of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 24, No. 2, Mar. 1996, pp. 110-118. |
Miola et al., “Use of Bimetallic Tubes in Urea Strippers”, Ammonia Technical Manual, 1996, vol. 36, pp. 254-258. |
Banker and Nobili, “Zirconium Explosion Clad for Cost Effective Process Equipment: Applications, Design, Fabrication”, published in Proceedings of 1997 Zirconium/Organics Conference, Wah Chang Corp., Sep. 1997, pp. 71-78. |
Outlook, Teledyne Wah Chang Albany, vol. 13, No. 2, Spring 1992, 12 pages. |
Outlook, Teledyne Wah Chang, vol. 16, No. 1, 1995, Te-Lin Yau, pp. 1-12. |
Nobili et al., “Recent Developments in Characterization of a Titanium-Steel Explosion Bond Interface”, published in Proceedings of Reactive Metals in Corrosive Applications Conference, Wah Chang, Albany, OR, Sep. 1999, 15. |
Nobili et al., “Continuing Innovation in Zirconium Explosion Clan Manufacturing”, presented at Wah Chang Reactive Metal Conference, Sep. 12, 2001, pp. 1-9. |
“Zr Outlook”, Teledyne Wah Chang Albany, vol. 4, No. 2, Spring 1983, printed from http://www.wahchang.com/WahChang/pages/outlook/html/bkissues/04_02.htm on Apr. 13, 2005, 9 pages. |
“Solid State Welding”, printed from http://key-to-metals.com/PrintArticle.asp?ID=51 on Apr. 13, 2005, 5 pages. |
Booklet No. 5 of 8: Production of Urea and Urea Ammonium Nitrate, European Fertilizer Manufacturers Association, article printed from http://www.efma.org/Publication/BAT%2095/Bat05/section04.asp on Apr. 13, 2005, 15 pages. |
“Interface Welding”, commercial website pages printed from http://www.interfacewelding.com/ on Apr. 13, 2005, 10 pages. |
Tsang S., “Friction Welding”, ASM Handbook, vol. 6, ASM International, 1993, pp. 315-317. |
Nicholas, E.D., “Radial Friction Welding”, ASM Handbook, vol. 6, ASM International, 1993, pp. 318-320. |
Elmer et al., “Fundamentals of Friction Welding”, ASM Handbook, vol. 6, ASM International, 1993, pp. 150-155. |
Satyro et al., “Modeling Urea Processes: A New Thermodynamic Model of Software Integration Paradigm”, printed from Online Chemical Engineering Information at cheresources.com, presented at The Chemical Engineers' Resource Page, Aug. 14, 2004, 20 pages. |
Lison, R., “Advanced Application, Spin Welding for Special Metals”, Industrie Anzeiger Extra, pp. 73-75 (undated). |
ASM Committee on Explosion Welding, “Explosion Welding”, pp. 705-718 (undated). |
Schwartz, M. M., “Metals Joining Manual”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979, 62 pages. |
“White Paper Autofrettage,” Maximator Test, LLC, Jul. 2, 2009, 4 pages. |
Aguayo et al., “Elastic Stability and Electronic Structure of fcc Ti, Zr, and Hf: A First-principles Study,” Physical Review B, vol. 65, 092106, 4 pages, Feb. 2002. |
Alegre et al., “Fatigue design of wire-wound pressure vessels using ASME-API 579 procedure,” Eng Fail Anal, pp. 1-12, 2009. |
Andrews et al., “Hydraulic Testing of Ordnance Components,” ASME, vol. 128, pp. 162-167, May 2006. |
Burton et al., “Army Materials Research: Transforming Land Combat Through New Technologies,” AMPTIAC Quarterly, vol. 8, No. 4, 10 pages, 2004. |
Del Corso, “Effect of Cold Drawing & Heat Treating on Powder Metallurgy Processed ASTM F 1537 Alloy 1 & Alloy 2 Barstock,” Carpenter Technology Corporation, Reading, PA, 6 pages, 2003. |
Gloaguen et al., “Measurement and Prediction of Residual Stresses and Crystallographic Texture Development in Rolled Zircaloy-4 Plates: X-ray Diffraction and the Self-Consistent Model,” Acta Materialia, vol. 55, p. 4369-4379, 2007. |
Janaki Ram et al., “Microstructure and Wear Properties of LENS@ Deposited medical Grade CoCrMo,” J. Mater Sci: Mater Med, vol. 19, pp. 2105-2111, 2008. |
Mani Krishna et al, “Microstructural and Textural Developments During Zircaloy-4 Fuel Tube Fabrication,” Journal of Nuclear Materials, vol. 383, pp. 78-85, 2008. |
Mani-Medrano et al., “Effect of Plastic Deformation on the Isothermal FCC/HCP Phase Transformation During Aging of Co—27Cr—5Mo—0.05C Alloy,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 560, pp. 23-28, 2007. |
Montero-Ocampo et al., “Effect of Fcc-Hcp Phase Transformation Produced by Isothermal Aging on the Corrosion Resistance of a Co—27CR—5Mo—0.05C Alloy,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, vol. 33A, pp. 2229-2235, Jul. 2002. |
Opris et al., “Development of Stellite Alloy Composites with Sintering/HIPing Technique for Wear-Resistant Applications,” Materials & Design, vol. 28, pp. 581-591, 2007. |
Parker et al., “Residual Stresses and Lifetimes of Tubes Subjected to Shrink Fit Prior to Autofrettage,” ASME, vol. 125, pp. 282-286, Aug. 2003. |
Paul et al., “Hot Working Characteristics of Cobalt in the Temperature Range 600-950° C.,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 60, pp. 104-107, 2009. |
Perry et al., “The Influence of the Bauschinger Effect on the Yield Stress, Young's Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio of a Gun Barrel Steel,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, vol. 128, pp. 179-184, May 2006. |
Robertson et al., “Crystallographic Texture for Tube and Plate of the Superelastic/Shape-Memory Alloy Nitinol Used for Endovascular Stents,” Wiley InterScience, pp. 190-199, 2004. |
Robertson et al., “Effect of Product Form and Heat Treatment on the Crystallographic Texture of Austenitic Nitinol,” J. Mater Sci, vol. 41, pp. 621-630, 2006. |
Theaker et al., “Development of Crystallographic Texture in CANDU Calandria Tubes,” Thirteenth International Symposium, ASTM STP, pp. 445-464, 2002. |
Yu et al., “A Comparison of the Tribo-Mechanical Properties of a Wear Resistant Cobalt-Based Alloy Produced by Different Manufacturing Processes,” Transactions of the ASME, vol. 129, pp. 586-594, Jul. 2007. |
PMF Industries, Understanding Flowforming web archived Oct. 13, 2004 (http://web.archive.org/web/20041013173007/http://www.pmfind.com/Flowforming/Flowforming/Flowforming-6-04.pdf). |
Antunes et al., “Influence of Stress State on High Temperature Fatigue Crack Growth in Inconel 718,” Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 24 (2001), pp. 127-135. |
Koch et al., “Seamless Thin-Walled TiAl6V4 Tubes Manufactured by Flow-Forming Process,” Titanium '92, Science and Technology, The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (1993), pp. 1429-1436. |
Rifling by Flow Forming: A New Developed Method for Rifling Barrels, 2007, (http://www.macdor.com/technical_documents/Rifling_by_flow_forming.pdf). |
Rifling: Facts, Discussion Forum, and Encyclopedia Article, printed Jun. 16, 2009, (http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Rifling). |
Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items, Contract No. W15QKN-04-M-0184, Award/Effective Date: Apr. 23, 2004, 2 pages. |
Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract, Amendment/Modification No. W15QKN-04-M-0184, Effective Date: Jul. 29, 2004, 3 pages. |
Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items, Contract No. W15QKN-05-P-0123, Award/Effective Date: Mar. 10, 2005, 11 pages. |
Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items, Contract No. W15QKN-05-P-0248, Award/Effective Date: Apr. 21, 2005, 10 pages. |
Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract, Amendment/Modification No. W15QKN-05-P-0248, Effective Date: Aug. 22, 2005, 2 pages. |
Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Items, Contract No. W15QKN-05-P-0312, Award/Effective Date: Jun. 8, 2005, 12 pages. |
Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract, Amendment/Modification No. W15QKN-05-P-0312, Effective Date: Aug. 23, 2005, 2 pages. |
Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract, Amendment/Modification No. W15QKN-05-P-0312, Effective Date: Oct. 25, 2005, 2 pages. |
Drawings for Contract No. W15QKN-04-M-0184, Release Date: Jul. 7, 2004, 2 pages. |
Drawings for Contract No. W15QKN-04-M-0184, Release Date: Nov. 2, 2004, 2 pages. |
DeFries, Richard S., “Hydrostatic Extrusion of 60MM Mortar Tubes,” National Technical Information Service, Oct. 1974. |
Gourley, Scott R., Mortar Technology, “Special Operations Technology, Online Edition”, retrieved from Internet Dec. 12, 2007: http://www.special-operations-technology.com/article.cfm?DocID=2051, pp. 1-6. |
Harlow et al., “Development of an Electrochemical Machining Process for Rifling Lined Gun Barrels,” Defense Technical Information Center, Dec. 1972, retrieved from Internet: http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=AS0909379, 1 page. |
Kim et al., “Effect of Thermo-Mechanical Treatment on Mechanical Properties and Shape Behavior of Ti-(26-28) at % Nb Alloys”, Materials Science and Engineering A, Feb. 6, 2006, pp. 839-843. |
Lee et al., “Structure-Property Relationship of Cast Ti-Nb Alloys”, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Blackwell Science Ltd., vol. 29, 2002, pp. 314-322. |
Powell, G. W., “Evaluation of Alloys for Use in 81-mm Mortar Tubes; Elevated-Temperature Failures,” Failure Analysis and Prevention, vol. 11, ASM Handbook, ASM International, 1986, pp. 263-297. |
Drennen et al., “Rotary Swaged Rapid-Fire Gun Barrels”, Battelle Memorial Institute, 100 pages, Aug. 1972. |
Tillack et al., “Heat Treating of Nickel Alloys”, adapted from Heat Treating, ASM Handbook, ASM International, vol. 4, pp. 907-912, 1990. |
Prevéy, “The Effect of Cold Work on the Thermal Stability of Residual Compression in Surface Enhanced IN718”, Lambda Technologies, 20th ASM Materials Solutions Conference & Exposition, 9 pages, Oct. 10-12, 2000. |
Frank, “Selection of Age-Hardenable Superalloys”, 13 pages, Jun. 2005. |
Cammett et al., “The Effect of Shot Peening Coverage on Residual Stress, Cold Work, and Fatigue in a Nickel-Base Superalloy”, Lambda Technologies, Proceedings of ICSP 9, pp. 1-6, Sep. 6-9, 2005. |
Liu et al., “Study of Residual Stresses in the Barrel Processed by the Radial Forging”, 2009 Second International Conference on Information and Computing Science, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 131-134, 2009. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,992, filed Jul. 1, 2014. |
Chang, O.W., “Zirconium and Titanium Flowformed Products Offer Myriad of Advantages,” Outlook, 1.sup.st Quarter, 1999. |
Scutti, J. J., “Flowformed Titanium Tubular Products,” Advanced Materials & Processes, Jan. 2001. |
Klocke, F., et al., “Laser-Assisted Metal Spinning of Advanced Materials,” Fraunhofer Institute of Production Technology IPT, pp. 1-5, 2003. |
Fonte, V., “Flowforming of Thin-Walled Tubes and Cylinders,” Dynamic Machine Works, Inc., 2001. |
Statement regarding prior activities of Dynamic Machine Works, Inc., Oct. 19, 2005. |
Da Silva et al., “Dynamic properties of NiTi shape memory alloy and classic structural materials: a comparative analysis”, Materials Science Forum vol. 643, 2010, pp. 37-41. |
Duerig, et al., Nitinol, Part 1, Mechanism and Behavior, Chapter 9, Alloying and Composition, SMST e-Elastic newsletter, Jan. 2011, ASM International, pp. 1-30. |
Littlefield, Andrew and Eric Kathe, “Adaptive Gun Barrel Vibration Absorber”, 2002, 12 pages. |
NACE Standard MR0175-2000, Standard Material Requirements, Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistant Metallic Materials for Oilfield Equipment, NACE International, 2000, 42 pages. |
American Petroleum Institute Specification 5LD “Specifications for CRA Clad or Lined Steel Pipe,” 3d edition, 2009, 48 pages. |
ASTM A264—12 Standard Specification for Stainless Chromium-Nickel Steel-Clad Plate, Section 7.2.1 Shear Strength, 2012, 6 pages. |
McMullen, “Application of Sub-Models to Explore Geometric Effects in Medium Caliber Gun Barrels,” Concurrent Technologies Corporation (Date Unknown), 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/747,705, filed Jun. 23, 2015. |
American National Standards Institute / American Petroleum Institute Specification 5CRA “Specifications for Corrosion Resistant Alloy Seamless Tubes for Use as Casing, Tubing and Coupling Stock,” 1st Edition, Feb. 2010, 101 pages. |
Dornfeld, W.H., “Thick-Walled Cylinders and Press Fits”, 2004 Retrieved from stressanalysis.ueuo.com/PressCylinderHam.pdf on Aug. 8, 2012, 17 pages. |
International Tube, “Tubing Terms”, Retrieved on Aug. 6, 2012 from www.internationaltube.com/files/glossary.pdf, 18 pages. |
Michel, D.J. et al., “Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Centrifugally Cast Alloy 718,” Metallurgical Transactions A, vol. 16A, pp. 1295-1306, Jul. 1985. |
Glasier et al., “Precission Seamless Cylinders by the Roll Extrusion Process”, Kaiser Rollmet, A Kaiser Aerospace & Electronics Co., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 20th Joint Propulsion Conference, Cincinnati, Ohio, Jun. 1984, 7 pages. |
Standard Specification for Seamless, Welded, and Heavily Cold Worked Austenitic Stainless Steel Pipes, Designation A 312/A 312M-06, ASTM International, May 2006, 11 pages. |
Corn, David L., “Roll Extruding Precision”, Metal Progress, Jun. 1977, pp. 78-81. |
Manning et al., “Technical Notes: The Effect of Retained Ferrite on Localized Corrosion in Duplex 304L Stainless Steel”, Welding Research Supplement, Sep. 1980, pp. 260s-262s. |
“On the Application of Flow Forming to the Fabrication of Type B Radioactive Material Package Containment Vessels”, Department of Energy Office of Packaging and Transportation (EM-45), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Rev. 1, May 25, 2010, 14 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61735987 | Dec 2012 | US | |
61819952 | May 2013 | US |