The present disclosure relates to cables, and more particularly to cables for use in window regulator systems.
Metal cables used in automotive window regulator systems typically have high requirements for tensile strength, tight bend fatigue resistance, and corrosion resistance. In addition, these cables must be relatively thin (e.g., less than two millimeters in diameter or a maximum cross-sectional dimension) and flexible due to the limited space available inside a typical vehicle door panel.
Corrosion resistance is commonly measured in hours pursuant to American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) test B117. Under ASTM B117, test samples are placed in an enclosed chamber and exposed to a continuous spray of heavy salt water fog or mist. The test sample's measured corrosion resistance is the amount of time that elapses before the test sample begins to visibly corrode. Typical window regulator cables have a corrosion resistance under ASTM B117 between about 144 hours and about 312 hours. These cables are typically made of a bundle of galvanized carbon steel wires with a galvanized zinc coating and a lubricant that is applied between the wires as the cable is stranded. However, the zinc coating is relatively soft and can be easily damaged during assembly, shipping, and use, resulting in reduced performance.
It is desirable to provide a cable that is more resistant to corrosion than typical window regulator cables, but greater corrosion resistance generally competes with other requirements, such as thickness, tensile strength, and fatigue resistance. For example, cables made entirely of stainless steel have high corrosion resistance but lack sufficient tensile strength and fatigue resistance to be suitable for use as window regulator cables. In addition, the thickness of the zinc coating on galvanized carbon steel cables cannot be practically increased to provide corrosion resistance above 312 hours while staying within the cable's overall thickness, strength, and flexibility requirements.
Thus, a need exists for a cable with improved corrosion resistance that maintains sufficient strength, fatigue resistance and flexibility in a thickness suitable for use in automotive window regulator systems.
In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a cable including a core with a plurality of first wires made of carbon steel and a plurality of strands surrounding the core. Each strand includes a plurality of second wires made of stainless steel. The cable has a maximum cross-sectional dimension less than 2 millimeters.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a cable including a core with a plurality of first wires, and a plurality of strands surrounding the core. Each strand includes a plurality of second wires. The cable defines a maximum cross-sectional dimension less than 2 millimeters and has a breaking strength of at least 2000 Newtons. In addition, the cable elastically elongates less than 1% of its total length and plastically elongates less than 0.05% of its total length under a tensile load of about 60% of the breaking strength. The cable has a corrosion resistance under ASTM B117 greater than 312 hours.
In another aspect, a window regulator system includes a track, a carriage coupled to the track for movement along the track, a window coupled to the carriage for movement with the carriage along the track, and a cable coupled to the carriage. The cable includes a core having a plurality of first wires made of carbon steel and a plurality of strands surrounding the core, each strand having a plurality of second wires made of stainless steel. The window regulator system also includes a motor coupled to the cable and operable to move the carriage along the track via the cable. The cable maximum cross-sectional dimension less than 2 millimeters, and the cable has a breaking strength of at least 2000 Newtons.
Other aspects of the disclosure will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the disclosure are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The disclosure is capable of supporting other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
In use, the motor is driven in a first direction to draw the first section 34 of the cable 26 toward the motor 22 while the second section 38 moves away from the motor 22. This moves the carriage 18 up along the track 14, thereby raising the window 30. The motor 22 is reversed to draw the second section 38 of the cable 26 toward the motor 22 while the first section 34 moves away from the motor 22. This moves the carriage 18 down along the track 14 and thereby lowers the window 30.
The illustrated cable 126 includes a core 128 and a plurality of strands 132 surrounding and wrapped around the core 128. The core 128 includes a plurality of first wires 136, and each of the strands 132 includes a plurality of second wires 140. In the illustrated embodiment, the core includes nineteen first wires 136, and the cable 126 includes eight strands 132, each with seven second wires 140. In other embodiments, the number of first wires 136, strands 132, and/or second wires 140 may vary. The cable 126 has a maximum cross-sectional dimension D that is less than two millimeters, such that the cable 126 is thin enough to be suitable for use in a window regulator system. In the illustrated embodiment, the dimension D of the cable 126 is about 1.5 millimeters. As used in the context of the dimension D, the word “about” means within a tolerance of +0.05 millimeters.
With continued reference to
The stainless steel strands 132 have higher corrosion resistance than the core 128 and therefore protect the core 128 from corrosion. The plastic coating forms a vapor barrier between the core 128 and the strands 132 to inhibit infiltration of moisture into the core 128, which further improves the corrosion resistance of the cable 126. The carbon steel material of the core 128 is stronger (i.e. has a higher tensile strength) and more fatigue resistant than the stainless steel material of the strands 132.
The illustrated cable 226 includes a core 228 and a plurality of strands 232 surrounding and wrapped around the core 228. The core 228 includes a plurality of first wires 236, and each of the strands 232 includes a plurality of second wires 240. In the illustrated embodiment, the core includes nineteen first wires 236, and the cable 226 includes eight strands 232, each with seven second wires 240. In other embodiments, the number of first wires 236, strands 232, and/or second wires 240 may vary. The first wires 236 are made of carbon steel. For example, the first wires 236 may be made of Type 60B carbon steel having a carbon content between 0.4% and 0.9% by weight. In some embodiments, the first wires 236 may be galvanized with a zinc and aluminum coating surrounding each individual wire 236 at a coating weight of at least 15 grams per square meter. Alternatively, the first wires 236 may include a zinc and nickel coating surrounding each individual wire 236. The second wires 240 are made of uncoated stainless steel. For example, the second wires 240 may be made of SAE 304 series stainless steel. Alternatively, other types of austenitic stainless steel may be used. The core 228 does not include a plastic coating like the core 128 of the cable 126. The cable 226 has a maximum cross-sectional dimension D that is less than two millimeters, such that the cable 226 is thin enough to be suitable for use in a window regulator system. In the illustrated embodiment, the dimension D of the cable 226 is about 1.5 millimeters.
The stainless steel strands 232 have higher corrosion resistance than the core 228 and therefore protect the core 228 from corrosion. The zinc and nickel coating on each of the first wires 236 protects the core 228 from any moisture that may infiltrate between the strands 232. The carbon steel material of the core 228 is stronger (i.e. has a higher tensile strength) and more fatigue resistant than the stainless steel material of the strands 232.
Experimental testing was performed on the cables 126, 226, which confirmed that the cables 126, 226 have corrosion resistance superior to that of typical window regulator cables. The cables 126, 226 were tested for durability (i.e. fatigue resistance), breaking strength, corrosion resistance, elastic elongation, and plastic elongation. To test durability, the cables 126, 226 were subjected to a tensile load of 160 Newtons (N) and moved back and forth a travel distance of 200 mm, six times (or cycles) per minute. The number of cycles before failure was recorded. To test breaking strength, the cables 126, 226 were subjected to a tensile load that gradually increased until failure. Corrosion resistance was tested according to the procedures set forth in ASTM B117. Elastic elongation (or elasticity) was tested by applying a tensile load of 1560 N to the cables 126, 226 and measuring an elastic elongation of the cable 126, 226 as a percentage of the starting length (i.e. before loading) of each cable 126, 226. Plastic elongation (or plasticity) was tested by removing the tensile load of 1560 N from the cables 126, 226 and measuring the difference between the starting length of each cable 126, 226 and ending length (i.e. after unloading) of each cable 126, 226, as a percentage of the starting length of each cable 126, 226. These test results are summarized in Table 1 below:
As evident from the data in Table 1, both the cables 126 and 226 have a minimum breaking strength greater than 2,000 N, and in some embodiments greater than 2,500 N. The data in Table 1 also demonstrates that both the cables 126 and 226 have a fatigue resistance greater than 13,000 durability cycles. In addition, each of the cables 126, 226 elastically elongates less than 1% of its total length under a tensile load of about 60% of the breaking strength of the respective cable 126, 226, and each of the cables 126, 226 plastically elongates less than 0.05% of its total length under a tensile load of about 60% of the breaking strength of the respective cable 126, 226. Finally, the cable 126 demonstrated a corrosion resistance of 1,000 hours under ASTM B117, and the cable 226 demonstrated a corrosion resistance of 600 hours under ASTM B117.
Various features of the disclosure are set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3778994 | Humphries | Dec 1973 | A |
5199310 | Yoshimura | Apr 1993 | A |
5475973 | Furukawa et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
20050034375 | Vanderbeken et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20080244981 | Arimoto | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100031575 | Kinoshita | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100223852 | Arimoto | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20130283697 | Galliot | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140102007 | Pavlovic | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20170145729 | Hernandez-Urbina | May 2017 | A1 |
20180334843 | Fortin | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200181481 | May 2000 | KR |
2007071340 | Jun 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/IB2019/000957 dated Jan. 16, 2020 (9 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200087855 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |