The present disclosure pertains to systems and methods for producing corrosive resistant surfaces, and the like. More particularly, the present disclosure pertains to systems with corrosive resistant surfaces at high temperatures and/or pressures and methods of forming corrosive resistant surfaces at high temperatures and/or pressures.
The presently claimed invention was made by or on behalf of the below listed parties to a joint research agreement. The joint research agreement was in effect on or before the date the claimed invention was made, and the claimed invention was part of the joint research agreement and made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of the joint research agreement. The parties to the joint research agreement are Purdue University; University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Georgia Tech Research Corporation.
The disclosure of the subject matter on which the 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(2) rejection in the Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 16, 2020, is based and the claimed invention were made by or on behalf of parties to a joint research agreement under 35 U.S.C. § 102(c). The joint research agreement as in effect on or before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. The claimed invention was made as a result of activities undertaken within the scope of the joint research agreement.
A variety of approaches and systems have been developed for producing materials that are resistant to corrosion. Such approaches may include utilizing materials having surfaces exposed to corrosive materials in a system that are naturally resistant to corrosion under operating conditions of the system. Of the known approaches for producing systems with materials that are resistant to corrosion, each has certain advantages and disadvantages.
This disclosure is directed to several alternative designs for, devices for, and methods of creating thermodynamically noble materials at high temperatures. Although it is noted that noble materials are known, there exists a need for improvement on those noble materials.
Accordingly, one illustrative instance of the disclosure may include a method of rendering a material thermodynamically noble. The method may include heating a mixture of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide and applying the heated mixture of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide to a material to render the material thermodynamically noble. In some cases, the mixture of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide may be heated to a temperature at or above three hundred (300) degrees Celsius.
Another illustrative instance of the disclosure may include a heat exchanger having a passageway defined at least in part by a plate formed from a first material. The first material may be coated with a copper coating such that the passageway is at least partially coated with the copper coating. The heat exchanger may be configured to receive fluid in the passageway, where the fluid is at or above a temperature of about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius.
Another illustrative instance of the disclosure may include a method of operating a power system. The method may include heating a working fluid of the power system and imparting nobility to a copper material of a passageway of the power system by passing the heated working fluid through the passageway. The working fluid may be a mixture of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. The mixture may have a carbon monoxide content of at least ten (10) parts per million of carbon dioxide.
The above summary of some example embodiments is not intended to describe each disclosed embodiment or every implementation of the disclosure.
The disclosure may be more completely understood in consideration of the following detailed description of various embodiments in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
While the disclosure is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit aspects of the claimed disclosure to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the claimed disclosure.
For the following defined terms, these definitions shall be applied, unless a different definition is given in the claims or elsewhere in this specification.
All numeric values are herein assumed to be modified by the term “about”, whether or not explicitly indicated. The term “about” generally refers to a range of numbers that one of skill in the art would consider equivalent to the recited value (i.e., having the same function or result). In many instances, the term “about” may be indicative as including numbers that are rounded to the nearest significant figure.
The recitation of numerical ranges by endpoints includes all numbers within that range (e.g., 1 to 5 includes 1, 1.5, 2, 2.75, 3, 3.80, 4, and 5).
Although some suitable dimensions, ranges and/or values pertaining to various components, features and/or specifications are disclosed, one of skill in the art, incited by the present disclosure, would understand desired dimensions, ranges and/or values may deviate from those expressly disclosed.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. As used in this specification and the appended claims, the term “or” is generally employed in its sense including “and/or” unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
As used in this specification and the appended claims, terms such as first, second, third, and so on, along with top, bottom, side, left, right, above, below, and/or other similar relative terms and are used herein for descriptive purposes unless the content clearly dictates otherwise.
The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings in which similar elements in different drawings are numbered the same. The detailed description and the drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict illustrative embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed disclosure. The illustrative embodiments depicted are intended only as exemplary. Selected features of any illustrative embodiment may be incorporated into an additional embodiment unless clearly stated to the contrary.
Various devices and systems have materials that come into contact with corrosive materials and under certain operating conditions these materials may deteriorate after exposure to the corrosive materials, particularly at high temperatures and/or high pressures. In one example, a heat exchanger or other component in a power system (e.g., pipes, coils, tubes, valves, pumps, turbines, compressors, and/or one or more other components of a power generation system or other power system) may have one or more passageways that interact with a working fluid (e.g., a gas, liquid, or other material without a fixed shape) at high temperatures (e.g., temperatures above about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius) and/or high pressures (e.g., pressures between about 7.5 Megapascal (MPa) and 20 MPa and above) during operation of the power system, where the working fluid may be considered corrosive at operating conditions of the power system and may cause the material forming a surface of the passageway to corrode (e.g., due to oxidation) and/or carburize over time. Additionally or alternatively, other systems and/or components of other systems including, but not limited to, sequestration of CO2 systems, CO2 piping systems, CO2 pumping systems, CO2 storage systems, etc. may interact with corrosive fluids at high or low temperatures and/or at high or low pressures and the corrosive fluids may cause material forming a surface of the system or component of the system to corrode and/or carburize over time.
Power systems may have operating conditions with temperatures between three hundred (300) degrees Celsius and nine hundred (900) degrees Celsius or higher. Illustrative next generation power systems may include nuclear reactors power systems, coal power systems (e.g., third generation coal power systems and/or other coal power systems), concentrated solar power (CSP) systems, and/or other suitable types of power systems. The Brayton cycle, which may utilize supercritical CO2 (sCO2) (e.g., CO2 at temperatures above the critical point of CO2 (e.g., three hundred (300) degrees Celsius)) as a heat transfer fluid, has been identified as a thermodynamic cycle that may be utilized with next generation power systems due to its structural stability at high temperatures (e.g., temperatures above about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius) and high pressures (e.g., pressures between about 7.5 MPa and 20 MPa and above); example pressures of systems utilizing sCO2 are discussed in Ahn, Yoonhan, et al. “Review of Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Technology and Current Status of Research and Development.” Nucl Eng Technol 47 (2015): 647-661, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety). Other thermodynamic cycles in addition to or as an alternative to the Brayton cycle may be utilized with next generation power systems. As the Brayton cycle and/or other thermodynamic cycles may utilize high temperatures and/or high pressures, one or more heat exchangers and/or other power system components that can withstand high temperatures and high pressures facilitate operation of power systems utilizing the Brayton cycle and/or other thermodynamic cycle.
Further, devices and systems having components with surfaces that contact corrosive materials at high temperatures and/or high pressures other than devices and components of power systems are contemplated. For example, devices and systems related to aircraft, space structures, and/or other devices, systems, or industries incorporating energy conversion systems may have components with surfaces that contact corrosive materials at high temperatures and/or high pressures.
A technique for protecting against corrosion and/or carburization of structural material (e.g., material maintaining a general form of a structure) in a system having operating conditions with high temperatures and/or high pressures may include providing a layer of non-corrosive material over the structural material and/or otherwise treating the structural material contacting the corrosive fluid such that the material (e.g., the structural material and/or the layer of non-corrosive material) is resistant to corrosion and/or carburization resulting from contact with the corrosive fluid and/or is resistant to degradation from high temperatures and/or high pressures resulting from the operating conditions of the system. In some cases, a layer of non-corrosive material may be a layer of non-structural material that receives its shape from an underlying structural material (e.g., a substrate), but it is contemplated that the layer of non-corrosive material may be a layer of structural material.
Although the disclosed concepts may be primarily described herein with respect to heat exchangers for power systems that operate at high temperatures and/or high pressures, the devices and techniques discussed herein may be used for and/or with other devices and/or components of devices. For example, the disclosed concepts may be applied to any passageway of a power system or other system that contacts corrosive fluid or other corrosive material including, but not limited to, passageways of valves, pumps, turbines, compressors, piping, coils, or tubing in a power system and/or other system.
Turning to the Figures,
The fluid entering the heat exchanger 10 may be configured to perform a heat transfer as the fluid flows from the inflow pipes 14, 16 to the outflow pipes 18, 20 via channels in plates of the heat exchanger 10. In some cases, the fluid flowing into the heat exchanger 10 through one of the inflow pipes 14, 16 may be cooler than the fluid flowing into the heat exchanger 10 through the other of the inflow pipes 14, 16 to facilitate transferring heat between the respective fluids.
The fluid may be any type of fluid configured to transfer heat with another fluid through walls of a channel. In some cases, the fluid may be a supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2), steam (e.g., ultra-supercritical (USC) steam or other steam), a liquid (e.g., water, etc.), and/or one or more other suitable materials.
The plates 22, when included, may be connected to each other in one or more manners to form the heat exchanger 10. In some cases, the plates 22 may be bonded together. In one example, adjacent plates 22 may be brazed or diffusion bonded together to form passageways with the channels 24. Other connection techniques are contemplated.
The channels 24 of each plate 22 may take on a suitable configuration to form passageways that facilitate heat transfer between fluid in adjacent passageways. In some cases, the channels 24 may be curved, may be straight, may be angled, may zigzag, may take on one or more other shapes, and/or may be formed by bumps or formations in each plate 22. Curves and/or changes in direction of the channels 24 may result in increased heat transfer surface areas of the channels 24 and more efficient heat transfer when compared to straight channels 24 or channels 24 having fewer curves and/or turns.
As discussed above, the heat exchanger 10 may be utilized in power systems. For example, power systems utilizing the Rankine cycle, Brayton cycle, and/or other thermodynamic cycle may utilize heat exchangers. Additionally, heat exchangers may be utilized in other types of power systems, along with or as other types of types of devices and systems.
Heat exchangers and/or other components of systems may be formed from a structural material such as a stainless steel (e.g., ferritic stainless steel, 316 stainless steel, etc.) and/or other suitable material. However, stainless steel and/or other materials may oxidize and/or carburize when exposed to sCO2, particularly at high temperatures (e.g., temperatures above about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius) and/or high pressures (e.g., pressures between about 7.5 MPa and 20 MPa and above). As such, a material that may be or may be made to be thermodynamically noble may be utilized for heat exchangers and/or other devices or components of systems in addition to or as an alternative to a stainless steel or other suitable structural material that may be reactive (e.g., may corrode and/or carburize) when in contact with sCO2 or other fluid at high temperatures and/or high pressures. Example materials that may be or may be made to be thermodynamically noble at high temperatures and/or high pressures may include gold, silver, platinum, palladium, copper, nickel, molybdenum, chromium, titanium, zirconium, yttrium, and/or other noble materials. In some cases, alloys including the above thermodynamically noble materials may retain their thermodynamically noble properties.
In one example, copper may be utilized as a material of the heat exchanger 10 of a power system utilizing sCO2 at high temperatures (e.g., temperatures above about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius). To maintain the structural integrity of the heat exchanger 10 and/or for other purposes, the heat exchanger 10 or other component may be formed from a first material (e.g., a structural material of stainless steel or other structural material (e.g., structural metals)) and may have passageways coated with a second material (e.g., a structural or non-structural layer of copper, copper alloys, silver, silver alloys, nickel, nickel alloys, and/or other material that has thermodynamically noble properties when interacting with sCO2 at high temperatures) applied thereto. In such cases, the first material may be considered a substrate to which the second material is applied. When copper is utilized as the second material 28, the heat exchanger 10 may maintain its thermal property performance due, at least in part, to the copper having a higher thermal conductive than the first material of the substrate.
In addition to or as an alternative to applying the second material to the first material of the heat exchanger 10, the second material may be applied to a first material of one or more other components of power system utilizing sCO2 or other working fluid at high temperatures (e.g., temperatures above about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius). In some cases, the second material may be applied to surfaces of piping, tubing, valves, and/or other components of the power system that may be in contact with sCO2 during operation of the power system.
Although the passageways 26 are depicted as having a rounded cross-section, the passageways 26 may take on a cross-section that has one or more other full or partial shapes including, but not limited to, a full or partial square, a full or partial rectangle, a full or partial star, and/or one or more other suitable shapes. Additionally or alternatively, the shape and/or sizes of a cross-section of a passageway 26 may be the same or different than the shape and/or size of cross-sections of one or more adjacent passageways 26. Further, the shape and/or size of a cross-section of a passageway 26 may be consistent along a length of the passageway 26 or the shape and/or size of a cross-section of a passageway 26 may vary along the length of the passageway 26.
As shown in
The second material may have a thickness T when applied to the first material. The thickness T of the second material may be selected based, at least in part on, a thickness needed to prevent carburization and/or oxidation of the first material when in an environment in which first material coated with the second material is expected to be used and/or the thickness T may be selected based, at least in part, on one or more other suitable factors. In some cases, the second material 28 as applied to the surface of the first material may have a thickness T of less than about ten (10) microns, between about 0.5 microns and about one thousand (1000) microns, and/or one or more other suitable thicknesses. In one example, the thickness T of the second material 28 applied to the surface of the first material may be at least fifty (fifty) microns. In further examples, the thickness T of the second material 28 applied to the surface of the first material may be between about thirty (30) microns and about one hundred fifty (150) microns and/or between about one hundred (100) microns and about three hundred (300) microns. Other ranges for thicknesses T of the second material 28 applied to the surface of the first material are contemplated.
Various methods for applying the second material 28 to the surface of the first material forming the passageway 26 may be utilized. In some cases, the second material 28 may be electroplated to the surface of the first material with electrodeposition techniques (e.g., using a sulfate-acid bath, a cyanide bath, and/or other bath). For example, when the second material 28 may be a copper material, a copper sulfate solution may be provided through the passageways 26 and a voltage applied to the heat exchanger 10 may be adjusted as the copper sulfate solution flows through the passageways 26 to achieve a uniform coating (e.g., thickness T) of the second material 28 or other thickness T of the second material 28 on the first material defining the passageways 26. Alternatively or in addition to applying the second material 28 to the surface of the first material with electrodeposition techniques, the second material 28 may be applied to the surface of the first material with a thermal spray technique, a diffusion bond technique, and/or other suitable techniques.
Once the second material 28 has been applied to the first material defining the passageways 26, the second material 28 may be rendered noble (e.g., thermodynamically noble at expected operating conditions of the heat exchanger) through one or more techniques. It may be necessary to impart thermodynamic nobility to render the second material 28 thermodynamically noble at high temperatures (e.g., temperatures above about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius) even when the second material 28 may exhibit noble properties at room temperature. For example, copper, which exhibits noble properties at room temperature, has low strength and poor steam-corrosion performance at high temperatures, and thus, imparting thermodynamic nobility to copper at high temperatures (e.g., when copper is used as the second material 28) allows the copper to perform unexpectedly well at high temperatures and/or high pressures (e.g., copper may be configured to stay structurally intact at high temperatures and/or high pressures).
The mixture of CO and CO2 may be heated to a suitable temperature. For example, the mixture of CO and CO2 may be heated to a temperature at or above about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius, between about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius and about nine hundred (900) degrees Celsius, between about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius and about seven hundred fifty (750) degrees Celsius, between about five hundred (500) degrees Celsius and about nine hundred (900) degrees Celsius, and/or one or more other suitable temperatures. In some cases, a mixture of CO and CO2 may occur or may be created during operation of a power system and the temperatures to which a mixture of CO and CO2 may be heated in a power system are discussed in Ahn, Yoonhan et al. cited above and incorporated by reference.
In the method of
As can be seen when comparing the oxide height H (e.g., oxidation 38) in the copper coating 36 in
In addition to protecting the 316 stainless steel sample 34 from oxidation, the copper coating 36 appears to result in a reduction and/or prevention of carburization of the stainless steel sample 34. Carburization may be a concern in CO2 environments because carbon ingress at high temperatures (e.g., temperatures above about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius) may be deeper than oxidation, and unlike oxidation, carburization may have the tendency to embrittle 316 stainless steel sample 34 or other structural material. The embrittling of the 316 stainless steel sample 34 or other structural material may be due to the formation of metal carbides at grain boundaries which then lock the boundaries and prevent ductal slipping. In environments such as those to which heat exchangers may be exposed (e.g., environments with cyclic loading and/or other environments), a fatigue susceptibility imparted by carburization is a known problem within the industry and potential limiting factor for the use of numerous materials (e.g., including, but not limited to, stainless steels) with otherwise promising mechanical properties at high temperatures.
The protection from carburization by the copper coating 36 may occur, at least in part, due to the copper acting as an inhibitor of carbon transport. While oxygen transport through copper may be relatively fast (e.g., when compared to other metals), it forms no stable carbides and copper has no or almost no solubility for carbon. As such, it may be difficult for carbon to pass through the copper coating 36 and degrade the 316 stainless steel sample 34 or other structural material. This distinction can be seen by comparing the 316 stainless steel samples 34 in
Column 56 depicts results of an ultimate tensile strength (UTS) test on the samples, column 58 depicts results of a yield strength (YS) test on the samples, and column 60 depicts the results of an elongation test on the samples. Row 62 depicts results for a 316 stainless steel sample without a copper coating that is not exposed to the operating conditions, row 64 depicts results for a 316 stainless steel sample without a copper coating that is exposed to CO2 at 20 MPa and 750 degrees Celsius, row 66 depicts results for a 316 stainless steel sample without a copper coating that is exposed to a mixture of CO/CO2 having fifty (50) ppm CO at 20 MPa and 750 degrees Celsius, row 68 depicts results for a 316 stainless steel sample with a copper coating that is exposed to CO2 at 20 MPa and 750 degrees Celsius, and row 70 depicts results for a 316 stainless steel sample with a copper coating that is exposed to a mixture of CO/CO2 having fifty (50) ppm CO at 20 MPa and 750 degrees Celsius. Row 72 depicts results for welded 316 stainless steel samples without a copper coating that is not exposed to the operating conditions, row 74 depicts results for welded 316 stainless steel samples without a copper coating that is exposed to CO2 at 20 MPa and 750 degrees Celsius, row 76 depicts results for welded 316 stainless steel samples without a copper coating that is exposed to a mixture of CO/CO2 having fifty (50) ppm CO at 20 MPa and 750 degrees Celsius, row 78 depicts results for welded 316 stainless steel samples with a copper coating that is exposed to CO2 at 20 MPa and 750 degrees Celsius, and row 80 depicts results for welded 316 stainless steel samples with a copper coating that is exposed to a mixture of CO/CO2 having fifty (50) ppm CO at 20 MPa and 750 degrees Celsius.
The results depicted in the chart 50 were obtained by applying tensile tests to the samples at room temperature and tend to indicate a large effect of a CO2 environment on mechanical properties of 316 stainless steel. As can be seen in
Similar to the results depicted in the graph 91 of
As discussed, copper may be applied to passageways of power systems and/or other systems that are configured to contact potentially corrosive materials at high temperatures (e.g., temperatures above about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius) to facilitate preventing corrosion and carburization of an underlying material. However, as copper is not naturally noble (e.g., non-reactive) at high temperatures, copper may be imparted with nobility through one or more processes, which may occur during or as part of operation of a power system or other system.
In the method 200, an amount of carbon monoxide may be added 210 into a working fluid of a power systems to create a mixture. Although not required, the working fluid may be a carbon dioxide (e.g., a supercritical carbon dioxide) and the mixture may have a carbon monoxide content of at least ten (10) ppm. The mixture of the working fluid and the carbon monoxide may be heated 212. In some cases, the working fluid may already be heated when the carbon monoxide is added and may accordingly heat the mixture of the working fluid and the carbon monoxide. Alternatively, the carbon monoxide may be injected 210 into the working fluid and the mixture may then be heated. Further, the mixture of carbon monoxide and the working fluid may be heated to a suitable temperature. For example, the mixture of carbon monoxide and the working fluid may be heated to a temperature at or above about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius, between about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius and about nine hundred (900) degrees Celsius, between about three hundred (300) degrees Celsius and about seven hundred fifty (750) degrees Celsius, and/or one or more other suitable temperatures. The heated working fluid mixture with carbon monoxide may then be passed 314 through passageways of the power system or other system coated with copper or other materials to be made noble at high temperatures. Once the mixture of carbon monoxide and the working fluid has been applied to the copper or other material of the passageways, the copper or other material may be thermodynamically noble and protect an underlying structural material from corrosion.
The adding 210 of carbon monoxide to the working fluid may include initially injecting carbon monoxide into the working fluid at startup of the power system and/or utilizing carbon monoxide that may result as a byproduct of utilizing supercritical carbon dioxide as the working fluid in the power systems. As such, it may be possible to facilitate maintaining a carbon monoxide content in the mixture of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide (e.g., the working fluid) at or above 10 ppm without injecting carbon monoxide into the working fluid after the initial injection of carbon monoxide.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present disclosure may be manifested in a variety of forms other than the specific embodiments described and contemplated herein. Accordingly, departure in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present disclosure as described in the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/551,124, filed on Aug. 28, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with government support under DE-EE0007117 awarded by the US Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
9638065 | Vermeersch | May 2017 | B2 |
20090294113 | Cha et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20120128463 | Held | May 2012 | A1 |
20120159922 | Gurin | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20190256979 | Sandhage | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Dyreby et al. (“Design considerations for supercritical carbon dioxide Brayton cycles with recompression.” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 136.10 (2014).) (Year: 2014). |
“Recommended Guidelines for the care of Power Boilers”, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2010. |
Y. Wan, X. Wang, H. Sun, Y. Li, K. Zhang & Y. Wu. “Corrosion Behavior of Copper at Elevated Temperature.” Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 7 (2012) 7902-7914. |
Rouillard, F., and T. Furukawa. “Corrosion of 9-12Cr Ferritic-martensitic Steels in High-temperature CO2.” Corrosion Science 105 (2016): 120-32. |
H. Magnusson and K. Frisk, “Self-diffusion and impurity diffusion of hydrogen, oxygen, sulphur and phosphorus in copper,” Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB, Stockholm, 2013. |
G. Musgrove, R. Pierres and J. Nash. “Heat Exchangers for Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Applications.” The 4th International Symposium for Supercritcal CO2 Power Cycles. Sep. 9 & 10, 2014. |
V. Dostal, “A Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycle for Next Generation Nuclear Reactors,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2004. |
Y. Kato, T. Nitawaki, and Y. Muto, “Medium Temperature Carbon Dioxide Gas Turbine Reactor,” Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 230, No. 1-3, pp. 195-207, 2004. |
B. D. Iverson, T. M. Conboy, J. J. Pasch, and A. M. Kruizenga, “Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycles for Solar-Thermal Energy,” Appl. Energy, vol. 111, pp. 957-970, 2013. |
B. A. Pint and J. R. Keiser, “The Effect of Temperature on the sCO2 Compatibility of Conventional Structural Alloys,” in the 4th Supercritical CO2 Power Cycle Symposium, 2014. |
I. G. Wright, B. A. Pint, J. P. Shingledecker, and D. Thimsen, “Materials Considerations for Supercritical CO2 Turbine Cycles,” in ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, 2013. |
J. T. Mahaffey, “Effect of Partial Pressure of Oxygen and Activity of Carbon on the Corrosion of High Temperature Alloys in s-CO2 Environments,” University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2017. |
M. N. Arik, “Corrosion of Ferritic Steels in Supercritical CO2 at 450C,” University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2017. |
G. Cao, V. Firouzdor, K. Sridharan, M. Anderson, and T. R. Allen, “Corrosion of austenitic alloys in high temperature supercritical carbon dioxide,” Corros. Sci., vol. 60, pp. 246-255, 2012. |
V. Firouzdor, K. Sridharan, G. Cao, M. H. Anderson, and T. R. Allen, “Corrosion of a stainless steel and nickel-based alloys in high temperature supercritical carbon dioxide environment,” Corros. Sci., vol. 69, pp. 281-291, 2013. |
J. Mahaffey, D. Adam, A. Brittan, M. Anderson, and K. Sridharan, “Corrosion of Alloy Haynes 230 in High Temperature Supercritical Carbon Dioxide with Oxygen Impurity Additions,” Oxid. Met., vol. 86, No. 5-6, pp. 567-580, 2016. |
J. Mahaffey, D. Adam, M. Anderson, K. Sridharan, A. Brittan, M. N. Arik, and A. Schroeder, “Effect of Oxygen Impurity on Corrosion in Supercritical CO2 Environments,” in the 5th International Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles Symposium, 2016. |
A. Brittan, J. Mahaffey, M. Anderson, and K. Sridharan, “Mechanical and Corrosion Performance of the Weld of 740H and 282,” in the 6th International Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles Symposium, 2018. |
J. T. Mahaffey, A. Schroeder, D. Adam, A. Brittan, M. H. Anderson, A. Couet, and K. Sridharan, “Effects of CO and O2 Impurities on Supercritical CO2 Corrosion of Alloy 625,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, pp. 1-12, 2018. |
L. Tan, M. H. Anderson, D. Taylor, and T. R. Allen, “Corrosion of austenitic and ferritic-martensitic steels exposed to supercritical carbon dioxide,” Corros. Sci., vol. 53, No. 10, pp. 3273-3280, 2011. |
Y. Gong, D. J. Young, P. Kontis, Y. L. Chiu, H. Larsson, A. Shin, J. M. Pearson, M. P. Moody, and R. C. Reed, “Acta Materialia on the breakaway oxidation of Fe9Cr1Mo steel in high pressure CO2,” Acta Mater., vol. 130, pp. 361-374, 2017. |
B. A. Pint, “The Effect of Impurities on Oxidation in CO2 at 750° C.,” in Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles Symposium, 2018, No. March. |
J. R. Davis, Ed., ASM Specialty Handbook: Heat-Resistant Materials. ASM International, 1997. |
R. D. Holmes, H. S. C. O'Neill, and R. J. Arculus, “Standard Gibbs free energy of formation for Cu2O, NiO, CoO, and FexO: High resolution electrochemical measurements using zirconia solid electrolytes from 900-1400 K,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, vol. 50, No. 11, pp. 2439-2452, 1986. |
D. J. Young, High Temperature Oxidation and Corrosion of Metals, 1st ed. Elsevier, 2008. |
A. Cohen, “Corrosion of Copper and Copper Alloys,” in Corrosion: Materials, vol. 13B, ASM Handbook, 13B ed., ASM International, 2005, pp. 125-163. |
J. Mahaffey, A. Kalra, M. Anderson, and K. Sridharan, “Materials corrosion in high temperature supercritical carbon dioxide,” in 4th International Symposium-Supercritical CO2 Power Cycles, 2014. |
“Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials E8/E8M,” vol. a. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2013. |
L. M. Weisenberger and B. J. Durkin, “Copper Plating,” in Surface Engineering, vol. 5, ASM Handbook, ASM International, 1994, pp. 167-176. |
V. Magula, J. Liao, K. Ikeuchi, T. Kuroda, Y. Kikuchi, and F. Matsuda, “New Aspects of Sensitization Behavior in Recent 316 Type Austenitic Stainless Steels,” Trans. JWRI, vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 49-58, 1996. |
D. M. E. Villanueva, F. C. P. Junior, R. L. Plaut, and A. F. Padilha, “Comparative study on sigma phase precipitation of three types of stainless steels□: austenitic , superferritic and duplex,” Mater. Sci. Technol., vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 1098-1104, 2006. |
C. Hsieh and W. Wu, “Overview of Intermetallic Sigma (σ) Phase Precipitation in Stainless Steels,” ISRN Metall., vol. 2012, No. 4, pp. 1-16, 2012. |
B. Weiss and R. Stickler, “Phase Instabilities During High Temperature Exposure of 316 Austenitic Stainless Steel,” Metall. Trans., vol. 3, No. April, pp. 851-866, 1972. |
Code Cases: Boilers and Pressure Vessels: Supplement 1. New York: ASME International, 2017. |
Code Cases: Boilers and Pressure Vessels. New York: ASME International, 2007. |
J. J. Jelinek, K. Sridharan, M. Anderson, T. R. Allen, G. Cao, and V. Firouzdor, “Corrosion Behavior of Alloys in High Temperature Supercritical Carbon Dioxide,” in Corrosion 2012, 2012. |
Code Cases: Boilers and Pressure Vessels: Supplement 1. New York: ASME International, 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190062892 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62551124 | Aug 2017 | US |