The invention relates to acoustical panels particularly suited for use in suspended ceilings.
Acoustical panels typically used as ceiling tiles or on walls, serve to absorb unwanted noise as well as to enclose a space and/or serve an architectural function.
Most conventional ceiling panels are made from a water-felting process or a water-based cast process. Usually a panel has a homogeneous porous core capable of absorbing sound. Lower cost products of these types are susceptible to sagging over time as a result of moisture absorption and have limited noise absorption capabilities measured as noise reduction coefficient (NRC). Higher grade products are typically more expensive to produce and can be relatively heavy. For the most part, water felted and water cast products exhibit relatively low sound absorption efficiency below 800 Hz. and are especially ineffective below 400 Hz.
The invention provides an acoustical panel formed of an apertured corrugated layer or layers with highly desirable sound absorbing properties. The panel is arranged to absorb those sound frequencies audible to the human ear and can be readily tuned to absorb sound in the lower frequencies of normal human hearing range. The invention is applicable to corrugated panels made of, for example, cardboard or plastic, either of which can be of a high recycled content.
The invention is based on the realization that corrugated panels perforated in a particular manner behave as pseudo Helmholtz resonating cavities able to produce relatively high NRC values and capable of being tuned to absorb a maximum of sound energy at a relatively low targeted frequency or frequencies.
More specifically, the invention relies on the discovery that the individual flutes of a corrugated panel can be treated like Helmholtz resonating cavities. By adjusting the relative size of the flutes, apertures, and aperture spacings, the frequency of maximum absorption can be determined. This frequency can be selected to target a specific noise or frequency band. Studies have shown corrugated panels can achieve ENRC (estimated noise reduction coefficient) as high as 0.8 with an absorption coefficient of 0.98 at a maximum absorption frequency below 600 Hz., for example. Moreover, these studies have shown a high correlation between classic Helmholtz cavity parameters and the analogous parameters discovered in the apertured corrugated acoustical panels of the invention.
In the various embodiments disclosed below, the invention is applied to ceiling panels for use, ordinarily, with suspended ceiling grid. In the industry, such panels have nominal face dimension of 2′×2′ or 2′×4′ or metric equivalents.
It has been discovered that an apertured or perforated corrugated panel such as shown in
where:
fH is the resonance frequency;
ν is the speed of sound;
A is the cross-sectional area of the neck;
Vo is the volume of the cavity; and
L is the length of the neck.
For the embodiment of
area of aperture Ao correlates to A, the neck area;
internal volume Vf of a flute between adjacent apertures or holes (essentially a measure of two half flute volumes on each side of an aperture) correlates to Vo;
the distance T from the apertured face to the opposed blind wall, taken as the thickness of the panel, correlates to L.
A maximum absorption frequency of a panel can be determined in accordance with the invention using these correlated parameters in the classic Helmholtz equation.
Sound frequency audible to the human ear and that is of concern, for example, in the NRC rating ranges between 200 Hz and 2,000 Hz. While traditional water-felted or cast ceiling tiles absorb sound at the higher ranges of these frequencies, they are of very limited effectiveness at or below 400 or 500 Hz. Moreover, it is difficult to economically produce a traditional tile with an NRC value greater than 0.7. It has been found that apertured corrugated panels such as disclosed in
3-Layer Data—10 mm Coroplast™
The foregoing table shows the effect of aperture size on the maximum absorption frequency. The smaller the aperture or perforation, the lower the absorption frequency.
Maximum absorption frequency is affected by the spacing between apertures measured in the lengthwise direction of the flutes. The greater the spacing the greater the resonant cavity volume, and consistent with the analogy to Helmholtz's equation, the lower the frequency.
It can be demonstrated that as the panel is made thicker and therefore the effective parameter T analogous to the Helmholtz neck opening length L is increased, the maximum absorption frequency will decrease.
The analogous parameters of the panel corresponding to the Helmholtz cavity resonant frequency equation are essentially the same as those given above in connection with the Coroplast™ 10. These analogous parameters are:
Ao=the area of an aperture;
Vf=the volume of a flute taken as the cross-sectional area of a flute times the distance between apertures;
T=taken as the total thickness of the panel.
It is possible to form apertures through the various layers 21, except for the last sheet, centered between the flutes 26 so as to utilize the spaces between the flutes as additional resonant cavities.
A third embodiment of an acoustic panel 30, represented in
Ao=Aperture area is the slot width times the flute width, i.e. the distance between adjacent flutes;
Vf=the volume of a flute between slots 36; or half the flute volume on each side of a slot;
T=the thickness of the panel 30.
Note that the flute volume relationship holds true for each of the disclosed embodiments. It is contemplated that the flutes could be blocked midway between the apertures extending along a flute such as by crushing or collapsing the walls locally and the same acoustic results would be obtained.
The analogous parameters of the panel 40 are as follows:
Ao=the width of the slot 46 times the distance between flutes;
Vf=the volume of a flute 42 between adjacent slots 46;
T=the thickness of a panel 40.
Spaces 48 intervening the flutes 42, being of substantially the same volume as the flutes, will absorb sound at substantially the same maximum absorption frequency as that of the flutes.
The panels illustrated in
As indicated, the flute cavities can be treated as pseudo Helmholtz resonating cavities that produce maximum sound absorption at the resonant frequency. Extensive studies have shown a high linear correlation between a calculated resonant frequency of maximum absorption using the analogous parameters discussed above. Examples of the correlation between calculated and observed frequency are shown in
If certain parameters are initially determined such as panel thickness, flute cross-sectional area, and distance along the flutes between apertures, two or more samples can be made with a different aperture size. A resonant or maximum absorption frequency can be calculated and be determined by empirical results for the samples. If an ideal actual resonance frequency is not obtained, with these samples, simple extrapolation of these data points can be used to modify the values of the analogous parameters to quickly reach a proper value of a selected variable or variables to obtain a desired maximum absorption frequency. By selecting the proper values of the analogous parameters, essentially any sound frequency between, say 200 and 2,000 Hz. can be established as a maximum absorption frequency. The invention, when practiced as described, is especially useful to produce a panel with a maximum absorption frequency at a value between 200 and 800 Hz. Sound absorption in this audible range is not readily obtained by traditional wet felted or cast ceiling tile.
It should be evident that this disclosure is by way of example and that various changes may be made by adding, modifying or eliminating details without departing from the fair scope of the teaching contained in this disclosure. The invention is therefore not limited to particular details of this disclosure except to the extent that the following claims are necessarily so limited.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1925453 | Mazer | Sep 1933 | A |
1953410 | Jacobson | Apr 1934 | A |
2043988 | Brown | Jun 1936 | A |
2123761 | Morton | Jul 1938 | A |
2308869 | Eckardt | Jan 1943 | A |
2434466 | Marc | Jan 1948 | A |
2705523 | Hasselquist | Apr 1955 | A |
2985553 | Anderson | May 1961 | A |
3293107 | Wells | Dec 1966 | A |
3507355 | Lawson | Apr 1970 | A |
3616119 | Wukowitz | Oct 1971 | A |
3616135 | Tesainer | Oct 1971 | A |
3684051 | Hopkins | Aug 1972 | A |
3749198 | Everitt et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3757889 | Everitt | Sep 1973 | A |
3789953 | Everitt | Feb 1974 | A |
3804195 | Everitt et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3811532 | Everitt | May 1974 | A |
3845593 | Zen | Nov 1974 | A |
3848696 | Everitt | Nov 1974 | A |
3848697 | Jannot et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3941207 | Croup | Mar 1976 | A |
3963094 | Nowikas | Jun 1976 | A |
4076100 | Davis | Feb 1978 | A |
4077821 | Doerfling | Mar 1978 | A |
4093482 | Ogata et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4114725 | Croasdale | Sep 1978 | A |
4119451 | Fujii | Oct 1978 | A |
4119749 | Roth et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4122911 | Croup | Oct 1978 | A |
4131702 | Alfter et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4150186 | Kazama | Apr 1979 | A |
4170674 | Matsuki | Oct 1979 | A |
4226299 | Hansen | Oct 1980 | A |
4227356 | Stern et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4228624 | Reneault | Oct 1980 | A |
4242172 | Fujii | Dec 1980 | A |
4256797 | Stamper et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4309853 | Lowe | Jan 1982 | A |
4416716 | Ichikawa et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4479992 | Haeseker et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4624083 | Diffrient | Nov 1986 | A |
4865201 | Liebel | Sep 1989 | A |
4886696 | Bainbridge | Dec 1989 | A |
4933225 | Abe | Jun 1990 | A |
4942085 | Guerro | Jul 1990 | A |
4987022 | Ueno | Jan 1991 | A |
5022963 | Porter et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5026586 | Tabor | Jun 1991 | A |
5057176 | Bainbridge | Oct 1991 | A |
5134014 | Zaima | Jul 1992 | A |
5149572 | Gaggero | Sep 1992 | A |
5206067 | Bonzo | Apr 1993 | A |
5245141 | Fortez et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5290622 | Tanabe | Mar 1994 | A |
5308678 | Tsujimura et al. | May 1994 | A |
5309690 | Symons | May 1994 | A |
5356695 | Mori et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
D357108 | Hutchison | Apr 1995 | S |
5416285 | Niehaus | May 1995 | A |
5433156 | Hutchison | Jul 1995 | A |
5456513 | Schmidt | Oct 1995 | A |
5487344 | Hutchison | Jan 1996 | A |
5491309 | Kotter | Feb 1996 | A |
5503903 | Bainbridge et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5509247 | Fortez | Apr 1996 | A |
5568774 | Hutchison | Oct 1996 | A |
5641950 | Kotter | Jun 1997 | A |
5656357 | Ogata et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5677032 | Anwyll | Oct 1997 | A |
5766395 | Bainbridge et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5879802 | Beard | Mar 1999 | A |
5884962 | Mattingly et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892187 | Patrick | Apr 1999 | A |
6089650 | Edgeller et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6264238 | MacDonald et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6393129 | Conrad et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6575527 | Bishop, Jr. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578895 | Tom | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6609591 | Wisniewski | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6644727 | Audibert et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6708626 | Ueda et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6789645 | Deblander | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6868940 | Mekwinski | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6951264 | Byma et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6966402 | Matias et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7128365 | Kiesewetter | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7128366 | Russell | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7194846 | Swiszcz et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
20010005964 | Colson et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010029718 | Snyder et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20030019179 | Colson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030192278 | Snyder et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040123555 | Cole | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20100175335 | Fuller et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3117137 | Nov 1982 | DE |
58-177742 | Oct 1983 | JP |